1932

Abstract

Transportation systems contribute significantly to air pollution and ∼15% globally and ∼25% in the United States to emissions climate-changing gases. In the United States, the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards for motor vehicles were significantly raised in 2012 for the first time in almost three decades. The standards now call for an average across manufacturers of 54.5 miles per gallon (mpg) for new passenger cars by 2025, or 163 grams per mile (g/mi) of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and of 47 mpg (196 g/mi) by 2021. The light truck standards, which include minivans and sport utility vehicles, call for fuel economy levels of 31 mpg (287 g/mi) in 2021 and of 40 mpg (222 g/mi) in 2025. Given approximately equal expected splits between car and light truck sales, these estimates imply combined car and light truck fleet averages of ∼40 to 41 mpg (217 to 222 g/mi) in 2021 and 50 mpg (178 g/mi) in 2025. However, because automakers have strategies to reduce GHGs in parallel with fuel economy, the actual in-use fuel economy of the fleet is expected to be somewhat lower. In this review, several automobile technology advances are described and assessed for providing relatively cost-effective solutions to meet CAFE standards for fuel economy and GHG reductions through 2025. The key points this review makes are that () loopholes in the current regulations will allow automakers to meet CAFE program goals with relatively minor incremental improvements to current technologies through 2025 and that () going beyond the current program, past 2025 to higher fuel economy levels and lower GHG emissions approaching 100 g/mi, is likely to involve heavier use of newer technologies especially including drivetrain electrification.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085844
2017-10-17
2024-06-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/energy/42/1/annurev-environ-110615-085844.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085844&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. 1. US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2016. Light-duty automotive technology, carbon dioxide emissions, and fuel economy trends: 1975–2016 Rep. EPA-420-R-16-010, EPA Washington, DC: [Google Scholar]
  2. 2. White House. 2012. Obama Administration finalizes historic 54.5 MPG fuel efficiency standards. White House Aug. 28. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2012/08/28/obama-administration-finalizes-historic-545-mpg-fuel-efficiency-standard [Google Scholar]
  3. 3. US Environ. Protect. Agency (EPA). 2016. Greenhouse gas emission standards for light-duty vehicles, manufacturer performance report for the 2015 model year Rep. EPA-420-R-16-014 [Google Scholar]
  4. 4. US Environ. Protect. Agency, Natl. Highw. Traffic Saf. Admin., US Dep. Transport., Calif. Air Resour. Board. 2017. Final determination on the appropriateness of the model year 2022–2025 light-duty vehicle greenhouse gas emissions standards under the midterm evaluation Rep. EPA-420-R-17-001. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2017-01/documents/420r17001.pdf [Google Scholar]
  5. 5. Eur. Comm. 2016. Reducing CO2 emissions from passenger cars. Climate Action Oct. https://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/transport/vehicles/cars_en [Google Scholar]
  6. 6. TransportPolicy.net. 2016. Japan: light-duty: fuel economy http://transportpolicy.net/index.php?title=Japan:_Light-duty:_Fuel_Economy [Google Scholar]
  7. 7. TransportPolicy.net. 2016. China: light-duty: fuel economy http://www.transportpolicy.net/index.php?title=China:_Light-duty:_Fuel_Consumption [Google Scholar]
  8. 8. Int. Counc. Clean Transp. (ICCT). 2014. Global passenger vehicle standards ICCT, Febr. http://www.theicct.org/info-tools/global-passenger-vehicle-standards [Google Scholar]
  9. 9. National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council. 2015. Cost, Effectiveness and Deployment of Fuel Economy Technologies for Light-Duty Vehicles Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press [Google Scholar]
  10. Bastani P, Heywood JB, Hope C. 10.  2012. U.S. CAFE standards: potential for meeting light-duty vehicle fuel economy targets, 2016–2025 MIT Energy Init. Rep., Mass. Inst. Technol Jan: http://web.mit.edu/sloan-auto-lab/research/beforeh2/files/CAFE_2012.pdf [Google Scholar]
  11. 11. Electr. Power Res. Inst. (EPRI), Nat. Resour. Def. Counc. 2015. Environmental assessment of a full electric transportation portfolio 1 background, methodology, and best practices Rep. 3002006875, EPRI, Sept. 17. http://www.eenews.net/assets/2015/09/18/document_cw_01.pdf [Google Scholar]
  12. Pakale PN, Patel SU. 12.  2015. Performance analysis of IC engine using supercharger and turbocharger—a review. Int. J. Res. Eng. Technol. 4:217–22 [Google Scholar]
  13. Bora MK. 13.  2014. Momentary notes on turbocharging: for better fuel economy, emission reduction and pronounced performance of an engine. Int. J. Technol. Res. Eng. 1:9897–903 [Google Scholar]
  14. Williams M. 14.  2008. HCCI: GM making advances with its “newest” fuel-economy improving engine tech. MotorTrend, June 30. http://www.motortrend.com/news/gm-hcci-fuel-efficient-system/
  15. Delorme A, Rousseau A, Wallner T, Ortiz-Soto E, Babajimopoulos A, Assanis D. 15.  2010. Evaluation of homogeneous charge compression ignition (HCCI) engine fuel savings for various electric drive powertrains Presented at World Battery, Hybrid, Fuel Cell Electr. Veh. Symp. Exhib. (EVS-25), 25th, Shenzhen, China, Nov. 5–9. http://www.autonomie.net/docs/6%20-%20Papers/HEVs%20%26%20PHEVs/Component%20Technologies/evaluation_of_hcci.pdf [Google Scholar]
  16. Kokjohn SL, Hanson RM, Splitter DA, Reitz RD. 16.  2011. Fuel reactivity controlled compression ignition (RCCI): a pathway to controlled high-efficiency clean combustion. Int. J. Engine Res. Spec. Issue Fuel Effic. 12:209–26 [Google Scholar]
  17. Hanson R, Kokjohn S, Splitter D, Reitz RD. 17.  2010. An experimental investigation of fuel reactivity controlled PCCI combustion in a heavy-duty engine. SAE Int. J. Eng. 3:1700–16 [Google Scholar]
  18. Santini D, Vyas A, Anderson J. 18.  2002. Fuel economy improvement via hybridization versus vehicle performance level SAE Tech. Pap 2002–01–1901 [Google Scholar]
  19. Roy F, Catania AM, Ossart F, Marchand C. 19.  2013. Hybrid powertrain design using optimal control strategies Presented at World Battery, Hybrid, Fuel Cell Electr. Veh. Symp. Exhib. (EVS-27), 27th, Barcelona, Spain, Nov. 17–20 [Google Scholar]
  20. Bellis M. 20.  2016. History of electric vehicles: the early years, electric cars from 1830 to 1930. ThoughtCo., Dec. 28. https://www.thoughtco.com/history-of-electric-vehicles-1991603
  21. Cobb J. 21.  2016. Americans buy their half-millionth plug-in car: top-selling light-duty plug-in electrified vehicle global markets. HybridCars.com Sept. 1. http://www.hybridcars.com/americans-buy-their-half-millionth-plug-in-car/ [Google Scholar]
  22. Farrell J, Holladay J, Pontau A, Wagner R. 22.  2016. Co-optimization of fuels and engines (co-optima) overview. US DOE Annu. Merit Rev. June 9 [Google Scholar]
  23. Kammen DM, Arons SM, Lemoine DM, Hummel H. 23.  2008. Cost-effectiveness of greenhouse gas emission reductions from plug-in hybrid electric vehicles Rep. GSPP08-014, Univ. Calif. Berkeley, Goldman Sch. Publ. Policy [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085844
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085844
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error