1932

Abstract

Corporate environmentalism (CE) pertains to firm-level efforts to reduce pollution and resource use along with protecting natural habitats. Importantly, firms pledge to undertake these actions beyond the requirements of the law. Although historically CE efforts focused on resource conservation, their contemporary focus is on pollution reduction to reduce direct harm to humans and their communities and on the protection of environmental sinks. We review two broad categories of CE: direct CE and indirect CE. Direct CE, whether undertaken unilaterally or collectively, pertains to firms themselves adopting policies that reduce the environmental impact of their activities, or disclosing information about their environmental performance. Indirect CE refers to policies of actors (such as financial institutions) that encourage firms seeking their resources (through loans, venture capital, etc.) to commit to environmental stewardship policies. Three key lessons emerge. First, firm-level characteristics, particularly size and economic performance, encourage CE. Second, although pressure from external stakeholders, especially environmental nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), has played an important role in discouraging policies that harm the environment, its effect on encouraging proenvironmental activities remains unclear. Third, the literature is ripe with serious methodological issues. The endogeneity between firms’ economic and environmental record and their CE efforts poses difficulty in drawing causal inferences.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090105
2016-10-17
2024-06-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/energy/41/1/annurev-environ-110615-090105.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090105&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Carroll AB.1.  1999. Corporate social responsibility: evolution of a definitional construct. Bus. Soc. 38:268–95 [Google Scholar]
  2. Donaldson T, Preston LE. 2.  1995. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications. Acad. Manag. Rev. 20:65–91 [Google Scholar]
  3. Freeman RE.3.  1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach Boston: Pitman Publ. Inc [Google Scholar]
  4. Carson R.4.  1962. Silent Spring Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt [Google Scholar]
  5. Hardin G.5.  1968. The tragedy of the commons. Science 162:1243–48 [Google Scholar]
  6. Meadows D, Meadows G, Randers J, Behrens W. 6.  1972. The Limits to Growth New York: Universe Books [Google Scholar]
  7. Meadows D, Randers J, Meadows D. 7.  2004. Limits to Growth: The 30-year Update Chelsea, VT: Chelsea Green Publ [Google Scholar]
  8. Carter J.8.  1977. The President's proposed energy policy (18 April 1977). Vital Speech Day 43:418–20 http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/primary-resources/carter-energy/ [Google Scholar]
  9. Pigou A.9.  1960. The Economics of Welfare London: Macmillan [Google Scholar]
  10. Cole DH, Grossman PZ. 10.  1999. When is command-and-control efficient: institutions, technology, and the comparative efficiency of alternative regulatory regimes for environmental protection. Wis. Law Rev.887–938 [Google Scholar]
  11. Boyle AE, Anderson MR. 11.  1996. Human Rights Approaches to Environmental Protection Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  12. Duit A, Feindt PH, Meadowcroft J. 12.  2016. Greening Leviathan: The rise of the environmental state?. Environ. Polit. 25:1–23 [Google Scholar]
  13. Coase RH.13.  1960. The problem of social cost. J. Law Econ. 3:1–44 [Google Scholar]
  14. Plambeck EL.14.  2012. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions through operations and supply chain management. Energy Econ 34:S64–S74 [Google Scholar]
  15. Cao X, Prakash A. 15.  2010. Trade competition and domestic pollution: a panel study, 1980–2003. Int. Organ. 64:481–503 [Google Scholar]
  16. Jaffe A, Peterson S, Portney P, Stavins R. 16.  1995. Environmental regulation and the competitiveness of U.S. manufacturing. J. Econ. Lit. 33:132–63 [Google Scholar]
  17. Knill C, Tosun J. 17.  2009. Hierarchy, networks, or markets: How does the EU shape environmental policy adoptions within and beyond its borders?. J. Eur. Publ. Policy 16:873–94 [Google Scholar]
  18. Mani M, Wheeler D. 18.  1998. In search of pollution havens? Dirty industry in the world economy, 1960 to 1995. J. Environ. Dev. 7:215–47 [Google Scholar]
  19. Eisner MA.19.  2004. Corporate environmentalism, regulatory reform, and industry self-regulation. Governance 17:145–67 [Google Scholar]
  20. Ostrom E.20.  1990. Governing the Commons New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  21. Antweiler W, Harrison K. 21.  2003. Toxic release inventories and green consumerism. Can. J. Econ. 36:495–520 [Google Scholar]
  22. Ayres I, Braithwaite J. 22.  1992. Responsive Regulation New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  23. Dolšak N, Ostrom E. 23.  2003. The Commons in the New Millennium Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  24. Gunningham N, Grabosky PN. 24.  1998. Smart Regulation Oxford, UK: Clarendon [Google Scholar]
  25. Kraft ME, Stephan M, Abel T. 25.  2011. Coming Clean Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  26. Friedman M.26.  1970. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine Sept. 13 32–33 [Google Scholar]
  27. McWilliams A, Siegel D. 27.  2001. Corporate social responsibility: a theory of the firm perspective. Acad. Manag. Rev. 26:117–27 [Google Scholar]
  28. Hemingway CA, Maclagan PW. 28.  2004. Managers’ personal values as drivers of corporate social responsibility. J. Bus. Ethics 50:33–44 [Google Scholar]
  29. Brammer S, Williams G, Zinkin J. 29.  2007. Religion and attitudes to corporate social responsibility in a large cross-country sample. J. Bus. Ethics 71:229–43 [Google Scholar]
  30. Prakash A.30.  2000. Greening the Firm Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  31. Pfeffer J, Salancik GR. 31.  1978. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  32. Gunningham N, Kagan R, Thornton D. 32.  2003. Shades of Green Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  33. Griffin JJ, Prakash A. 33.  2014. Corporate responsibility initiatives and mechanisms. Bus. Soc. 53:465–82 [Google Scholar]
  34. Russo MV, Fouts PA. 34.  1997. A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Acad. Manag. J. 40:534–59 [Google Scholar]
  35. Vogel D.35.  2005. Market for Virtue Washington, DC: Brookings Inst. Press [Google Scholar]
  36. Olson M.36.  1965. The Logic of Collective Action Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  37. King AA, Lenox M, Terlaak A. 37.  2005. The strategic use of decentralized institutions: exploring certification with the ISO 14001 management standard. Acad. Manag. J. 48:1091–106 [Google Scholar]
  38. Prakash A, Potoski M. 38.  2006. The Voluntary Environmentalists: Green Clubs, ISO 14001, and Voluntary Environmental Regulations Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  39. Van't Veld KV, Kotchen M. 39.  2011. Green clubs. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 62:309–22 [Google Scholar]
  40. DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW. 40.  1983. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am. Sociol. Rev. 48:147–60 [Google Scholar]
  41. Rees J.41.  1997. The development of communitarian regulation in the chemical industry. Law Policy 19:477–528 [Google Scholar]
  42. Granovetter M.42.  1985. Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. Am. J. Sociol. 91:481–510 [Google Scholar]
  43. Manzini P, Mariotti M. 43.  2003. A bargaining model of voluntary environmental agreements. J. Public Econ. 87:755–67 [Google Scholar]
  44. Morgenstern R, Pizer W. 44.  2007. Reality Check: The Nature and Performance of Voluntary Environmental Programs in the United States, Europe, and Japan Washington, DC: RRF Press [Google Scholar]
  45. Maxwell JW, Lyon TP, Hackett S. 45.  2000. Self-regulation and social welfare. J. Law Econ. 43:583–617 [Google Scholar]
  46. Brandeis LD.46.  1913. What publicity can do?. Harper's Weekly Dec. 20 10–13 [Google Scholar]
  47. Sullivan R, Gouldson A. 47.  2012. Does voluntary carbon reporting meet investors’ needs?. J. Clean. Prod. 36:60–67 [Google Scholar]
  48. Hahn R, Reimsbach D, Schiemann F. 48.  2015. Organizations, climate change and transparency: reviewing the literature on carbon disclosure. Organ. Environ. 28:80–102 [Google Scholar]
  49. Meyer JW, Rowan B. 49.  1977. Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. Am. J. Sociol.340–63 [Google Scholar]
  50. Levine DI, Chatterji AK. 50.  2006. Breaking down the wall of codes: evaluating non-financial performance measurement. Calif. Manag. Rev. 48:29–51 [Google Scholar]
  51. O'Rourke A.51.  2003. The message and methods of ethical investment. J. Clean. Prod. 11:683–93 [Google Scholar]
  52. Cormier D, Magnan M. 52.  1999. Corporate environmental disclosure strategies: determinants, costs and benefits. J. Account. Audit. Financ. 14:429–51 [Google Scholar]
  53. Stubbs W, Higgins C, Milne M. 53.  2013. Why do companies not produce sustainability reports?. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 22:456–70 [Google Scholar]
  54. Eleftheriadis IM, Anagnostopoulos EG. 54.  2014. Relationship between corporate climate change disclosures and firm factors. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 24:780–89 [Google Scholar]
  55. Al-Tuwaijria SA, Christensen TE, Hughes KE. 55.  2004. The relations among environmental disclosure, environmental performance, and economic performance: a simultaneous equations approach. Account. Organ. Soc. 29:447–71 [Google Scholar]
  56. Alonso-Almeida M, Llach J, Marimon F. 56.  2014. A closer look at the “Global Reporting Initiative” sustainability reporting as a tool to implement environmental and social policies: a worldwide sector analysis. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 21:318–35 [Google Scholar]
  57. Clarkson PM, Li Y, Richardson GD, Vasvari FP. 57.  2008. Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: an empirical analysis. Account. Organ. Soc. 33:303–27 [Google Scholar]
  58. Lee SY, Park YS, Klassen RD. 58.  2015. Market responses to firms’ voluntary climate change information disclosure and carbon communication. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 22:1–12 [Google Scholar]
  59. Kim EH, Lyon T. 59.  2011. When does institutional investor activism increase shareholder value? The carbon disclosure project. B.E. J. Econ. Anal. Policy 11:1–29 [Google Scholar]
  60. Stanny E, Ely K. 60.  2008. Corporate environmental disclosures about the effects of climate change. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 15:338–48 [Google Scholar]
  61. Tagesson T, Blank V, Broberg P, Collin SO. 61.  2009. What explains the extent and content of social and environmental disclosures on corporate websites: a study of social and environmental reporting in Swedish listed corporations. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 16:352–64 [Google Scholar]
  62. Amran A, Periasamy V, Zulkafli AH. 62.  2014. Determinants of climate change disclosure by developed and emerging countries in Asia Pacific. Sustain. Dev. 22:188–204 [Google Scholar]
  63. Dhaliwal DS, Li OZ, Tsang A, Yang YG. 63.  2011. Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: the initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. Account. Rev. 86:59–100 [Google Scholar]
  64. Herzenstein M, Posavac SS, Brakus JJ. 64.  2007. Adoption of new and really new products: the effects of self-regulation systems and risk salience. J. Mark. Res. 44:251–60 [Google Scholar]
  65. Matsumura EM, Prakash R, Vera-Muñoz SC. 65.  2013. Firm-value effects of carbon emissions and carbon disclosures. Account. Rev. 89:695–724 [Google Scholar]
  66. Berliner D, Prakash A. 66.  2015. Bluewashing the firm? Voluntary regulations, program design and member compliance with the United Nations Global Compact. Policy Stud. J. 43:115–38 [Google Scholar]
  67. Berliner D, Prakash A. 67.  2012. From norms to programs: the United Nations Global Compact and global governance. Regul. Gov. 6:149–66 [Google Scholar]
  68. Scott H.68.  2007. Sustainability 360: doing good, better, together. Wal-Mart News Feb. 1. http://www.wal-martchina.com/english/news/2007/20070202.htm [Google Scholar]
  69. Vandenbergh MP.69.  2007. The new Wal-Mart effect: the role of private contracting in global governance. UCLA Law Rev 54:913 [Google Scholar]
  70. Plambeck EL, Denend L. 70.  2008. The greening of Walmart. Stanf. Soc. Innov. Rev. 2008:53–59 [Google Scholar]
  71. Potoski M, Prakash A. 71.  2013. Green clubs: collective action and voluntary environmental programs. Annu. Rev. Poli. Sci. 16:399–419 [Google Scholar]
  72. Borck J, Coglianese C. 72.  2009. Voluntary environmental programs: assessing their effectiveness. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 34:305–24 [Google Scholar]
  73. Fransen L.73.  2012. Multi-stakeholder governance and voluntary programme interactions. Socio.-Econ. Rev. 10:163–92 [Google Scholar]
  74. Henriques I, Husted BW, Montiel I. 74.  2013. Spillover effects of voluntary environmental programs on greenhouse gas emissions: lessons from Mexico. J. Policy Anal. Manag. 32:296–322 [Google Scholar]
  75. Prakash A, Potoski M. 75.  2011. Voluntary environmental programs: a comparative perspective. J. Policy Anal. Manag. 31:123–38 [Google Scholar]
  76. Van der Heijden J. 76.  2012. Voluntary environmental governance arrangements. Environ. Polit. 21:486–509 [Google Scholar]
  77. King AA, Lenox M. 77.  2000. Industry self-regulation without sanctions: the chemical industry's Responsible Care program. Acad. Manag. J. 43:698–716 [Google Scholar]
  78. Overdevest C.78.  2010. Comparing forest certification schemes: the case of ratcheting standards in the forest sector. Soc. Econ. Rev. 8:47–76 [Google Scholar]
  79. Rivera J, De Leon P. 79.  2004. Is greener whiter? Voluntary environmental performance of western ski areas. Policy Stud. J. 32:417–37 [Google Scholar]
  80. Brouhle K, Griffiths C, Wolverton A. 80.  2009. Evaluating the role of policy levers. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 57:166–81 [Google Scholar]
  81. Barnett ML, King AA. 81.  2008. Good fences make good neighbors: a longitudinal analysis of an industry self-regulatory institution. Acad. Manag. J. 51:1150–70 [Google Scholar]
  82. Prakash A, Potoski M. 82.  2007. Collective action through voluntary environmental programs: a club theory perspective. Policy Stud. J. 35:773–92 [Google Scholar]
  83. Coglianese C, Nash J. 83.  2009. Applying club theory to government-sponsored voluntary programs. Voluntary Programs: A Club Theory Approach Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  84. Fiorino D.84.  2006. The New Environmental Regulation Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  85. Klyza C, Sousa D. 85.  2008. American Environmental Policy,. 1990–2006 .. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  86. Fransen L.86.  2012. Multi-stakeholder governance and voluntary programme interactions. Socio.-Econ. Rev. 10:163–92 [Google Scholar]
  87. Schouten G, Glasbergen P. 87.  2011. Creating legitimacy in global private governance: the case of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil. Ecol. Econ. 70:1891–99 [Google Scholar]
  88. Gulbrandsen L.88.  2009. The emergence and effectiveness of the Marine Stewardship Council. Mar. Policy 33:654–60 [Google Scholar]
  89. Khanna M, Damon LA. 89.  1999. EPA's voluntary 33/50 Program. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 37:1–25 [Google Scholar]
  90. Sasser EN, Prakash A, Cashore B, Auld G. 90.  2006. Direct targeting as NGO political strategy. Bus. Polit. 8:1–32 [Google Scholar]
  91. Kollman K, Prakash A. 91.  2001. Green by choice? Cross-national variations in firms’ responses to EMS-based environmental regimes. World Polit 53:399–430 [Google Scholar]
  92. Prakash A, Potoski M. 92.  2007. Investing up: FDI and the cross-national diffusion of ISO 14001. Int. Stud. Q. 51:723–44 [Google Scholar]
  93. Perez-Alerman P.93.  2012. Global standards and local knowledge building. PNAS 109:25–31 [Google Scholar]
  94. Arimura T, Hibiki A, Katayama H. 94.  2008. Is a voluntary approach an effective environmental policy instrument?. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 55:281–95 [Google Scholar]
  95. Turk AM.95.  2009. The benefits associated with ISO 14001 certification for construction firms: Turkish case. J. Clean. Prod. 17:559–69 [Google Scholar]
  96. Link S, Naveh E. 96.  2006. Standardization and discretion: Does the environmental standard ISO 14001 lead to performance benefits?. Eng. Manag. IEEE Trans. 53:508–19 [Google Scholar]
  97. Padma P, Ganesh L, Rajendran C. 97.  2008. A study on the ISO 14000 certification and organizational performance of Indian manufacturing firms. Benchmarking 15:73–100 [Google Scholar]
  98. Blackman A, Rivera JE. 98.  2010. The evidence base for environmental and socioeconomic impacts of ‘sustainable’ certification Work. Pap., Res. Future. http://www.rff.org/research/publications/evidence-base-environmental-and-socioeconomic-impacts-sustainable-0 [Google Scholar]
  99. Powers N, Blackman A, Lyon TP, Narain U. 99.  2011. Does disclosure reduce pollution? Evidence from India's green eating project. Environ. Resour. Econ. 50:131–55 [Google Scholar]
  100. Boyd B.100.  1990. Corporate linkages and organizational environment: a test of the resource dependence model. Strateg. Manag. J. 11:419–30 [Google Scholar]
  101. Statman M.101.  2006. Socially responsible indexes. J. Portf. Manag. 32:100–9 [Google Scholar]
  102. Renneboog L, Ter Horst J, Zhang C. 102.  2008. Socially responsible investments: institutional aspects, performance, and investor behavior. J. Bank. Financ. 32:1723–42 [Google Scholar]
  103. Bocken NMP.103.  2015. Sustainable venture capital—catalyst for sustainable start-up success?. J. Clean. Prod. 108:647–58 [Google Scholar]
  104. Lee MD, Lounsbury M. 104.  2011. Domesticating radical rant and rage: an exploration of the consequences of environmental shareholder resolutions on corporate environmental performance. Bus. Soc. 50:155–88 [Google Scholar]
  105. Uysal N.105.  2014. The expanded role of investor relations: socially responsible investing, shareholder activism, and organizational legitimacy. Int. J. Strateg. Commun. 8:215–30 [Google Scholar]
  106. Schueth S.106.  2003. Socially responsible investing in the United States. J. Bus. Ethics 43:189–94 [Google Scholar]
  107. Peifer J.107.  2011. Socially responsible investing: morality, religion, and the market from a sociological perspective. PhD Thesis, Cornell Univ [Google Scholar]
  108. Ritchie J, Dowlatabadi H. 108.  2015. Divest from the carbon bubble? Reviewing the implications and limitations of fossil fuel divestment for institutional investors. Rev. Econ. Financ. 5:59–80 [Google Scholar]
  109. Ansar A, Caldecott B, Tilbury J. 109.  2013. Stranded Assets and the Fossil Fuel Divestment Campaign: What Does Divestment Mean for the Valuation of Fossil Fuel Assets Oxford, UK: Smith Sch. Ent. Environ., Univ. Oxford [Google Scholar]
  110. Barnett ML, Salomon RM. 110.  2006. Beyond dichotomy: the curvilinear relationship between social responsibility and financial performance. Strateg. Manag. J. 27:1101–22 [Google Scholar]
  111. Capelle-Blanchard G, Monjon S. 111.  2014. The performance of socially responsible funds: Does the screening process matter?. Eur. Fin. Manag. 20:494–520 [Google Scholar]
  112. Humphrey JE, Lee DD, Shen Y. 112.  2012. Does it cost to be sustainable?. J. Corp. Financ. 18:626–39 [Google Scholar]
  113. Lee DD, Humphrey JE, Benson KL, Ahn JY. 113.  2010. Socially responsible investment fund performance: the impact of screening intensity. Account. Financ. 50:351–70 [Google Scholar]
  114. Geczy C, Stambaugh RF, Levin D. 114.  Oct 2005. Investing in socially responsible mutual funds Work. Pap., Financ. Dep., Univ. Pa [Google Scholar]
  115. Chan PT, Walter T. 115.  2014. Investment performance of “environment-friendly” firms and their initial public offers and seasoned equity offers. J. Bank. Financ. 44:177–88 [Google Scholar]
  116. Ghosh S, Nanda R. 116.  2010. Venture capital investment in the clean energy sector Tech. Note 814-052, Harv. Bus. Sch., Cambridge, MA [Google Scholar]
  117. Marcus A, Malen J, Ellis S. 117.  2013. The promise and pitfalls of venture capital as an asset class for clean energy investment research questions for organization and natural environment scholars. Organ. Environ. 26:31–60 [Google Scholar]
  118. Rai V, Funkhouser E, Udwin T, Livingston D. 118.  2015. Venture capital in clean energy innovation finance: insights from the US market during 2005–2014 SSRN Work. Pap. 2676216. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2676216 [Google Scholar]
  119. Cumming DJ, Henriques I, Sadorsky P. 119.  2013. “Cleantech” venture capital around the world. Work. Pap., Schulich Sch. Bus., York Univ
  120. Pernick R, Wilder C. 120.  2007. The Clean Tech Revolution: The Next Big Growth and Investment Opportunity New York: Harper Collins [Google Scholar]
  121. Basse-Mama H, Koch N, Bassen A, Bank T. 121.  2013. Valuation effects of corporate strategic transactions in the cleantech industry. J. Bus. Econ. 83:605–30 [Google Scholar]
  122. Herzberg F.122.  1966. Work and the Nature of Man Cleveland, OH: World Publ. Co [Google Scholar]
  123. Nielson DL, Tierney MJ. 123.  2003. Delegation to international organizations: agency theory and World Bank environmental reform. Int. Organ. 57:241–76 [Google Scholar]
  124. 124. United Nations Environ. Progr. (UNEP) 1992. Statement of Commitment by Financial Institutions on Sustainable Development Rio de Janeiro, Braz: UNEP [Google Scholar]
  125. Schmidheiny S, Zorraquin F. 125.  1996. Financing Change: The Financial Community, Eco-efficiency, and Sustainable Development Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  126. Jeucken M.126.  2001. Sustainable Finance and Banking: The Financial Sector and the Future of the Planet Sterling, VA: Earthscan [Google Scholar]
  127. Toulme NV, Cloud DE. 127.  1991. Fleet Factors case: a wrong turn for lender liability under superfund. Wake Forest Law Rev 26:17–21 [Google Scholar]
  128. Weber O, Fenchel M, Scholz RW. 128.  2008. Empirical analysis of the integration of environmental risks into the credit risk management process of European banks. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 17:149–59 [Google Scholar]
  129. Thompson P.129.  1998. Bank lending and the environment: policies and opportunities. Int. J. Bank Mark. 16:243–52 [Google Scholar]
  130. Orsato RJ, de Campos JG, Barakat SR, Nicolletti M, Monzoni M. 130.  2015. Why join a carbon club? A study of the banks participating in the Brazilian “Business for Climate Platform. ”. J. Clean. Prod. 96:387–96 [Google Scholar]
  131. Artiach T, Lee D, Nelson D, Walker J. 131.  2010. The determinants of corporate sustainability performance. Account. Financ. 50:31–51 [Google Scholar]
  132. Searcy C, Elkhawas D. 132.  2012. Corporate sustainability ratings: an investigation into how corporations use the Dow Jones Sustainability Index. J. Clean. Prod. 35:79–92 [Google Scholar]
  133. López MV, Garcia A, Rodriguez L. 133.  2007. Sustainable development and corporate performance: a study based on the Dow Jones Sustainability Index. J. Bus. Ethics 75:285–300 [Google Scholar]
  134. Robinson M, Kleffner A, Bertels S. 134.  2011. Signaling sustainability leadership: empirical evidence of the value of DJSI membership. J. Bus. Ethics 101:493–505 [Google Scholar]
  135. Hall PA, Soskice D. 135.  2001. Varieties of Capitalism. The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  136. Bartlett CA, Ghoshal S. 136.  1989. Managing Across Borders Boston, MA: Harvard Bus. Sch. Press [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090105
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090105
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error