Mitigation of Concurrent Flood and Drought Risks Through Land Modifications: Potential and Perspectives of Land Users

Literature Cited

1. 1.

   IPCC (Intergov. Panel Clim. Change) 2022. Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability: Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change H-O Pörtner, DC Roberts, M Tignor, ES Poloczanska, K Mintenbeck et al. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
2. 2.

   Arneth A, Olsson L, Cowie A, Erb K, Hurlbert M et al. 2021. Restoring degraded lands. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 46:569–99
   [Google Scholar]
3. 3.

   Yang TH, Liu WC. 2020. A general overview of the risk-reduction strategies for floods and droughts. Sustainability 12:72687
   [Google Scholar]
4. 4.

   Wilkinson ME, Addy S, Quinn PF, Stutter M. 2019. Natural flood management: small-scale progress and larger-scale challenges. Scott. Geogr. J. 135:1–223–32
   [Google Scholar]
5. 5.

   Belle JA, Collins N, Jordaan A. 2018. Managing wetlands for disaster risk reduction: a case study of the eastern Free State, South Africa. Jamba: J. Disaster Risk Stud. 10:1A400
   [Google Scholar]
6. 6.

   Lane NS. 2017. Natural flood management. WIREs Water 4:e1211
   [Google Scholar]
7. 7.

   Kreibich H, Van Loon AF, Schröter K, Ward PJ, Mazzoleni M et al. 2022. The challenge of unprecedented floods and droughts in risk management. Nature 608:80–86
   [Google Scholar]
8. 8.

   Ward PJ, de Ruiter MC, Mård J, Schröter K, Van Loon A et al. 2020. The need to integrate flood and drought disaster risk reduction strategies. Water Secur. 11:100070
   [Google Scholar]
9. 9.

   Brunner MI, Slater L, Tallaksen LM, Clark M. 2021. Challenges in modeling and predicting floods and droughts: a review. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Water 8:3e1520
   [Google Scholar]
10. 10.

    Mazzoleni M, Odongo VO, Mondino E, Di Baldassarre G. 2021. Water management, hydrological extremes, and society: modeling interactions and phenomena. Ecol. Soc. 26:44
    [Google Scholar]
11. 11.

    Wingfield T, Macdonald N, Peters K, Spees J, Potter K. 2019. Natural Flood Management: beyond the evidence debate. Area 51:4743–51
    [Google Scholar]
12. 12.

    Hartmann T, Jílková J, Schanze J. 2018. Land for flood risk management: a catchment-wide and cross-disciplinary perspective. J. Flood Risk Manag. 11:13–5
    [Google Scholar]
13. 13.

    Kuhlicke C, Seebauer S, Hudson P, Begg C, Bubeck P et al. 2020. The behavioral turn in flood risk management, its assumptions and potential implications. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Water 7:3e1418
    [Google Scholar]
14. 14.

    Rogger M, Agnoletti M, Alaouiet A, Bathurst JC, Bodner G et al. 2017. Land use change impacts on floods at the catchment scale: challenges and opportunities for future research. Water Resour. Res. 53:5209–19
    [Google Scholar]
15. 15.

    Filatova T. 2014. Market-based instruments for flood risk management: a review of theory, practice and perspectives for climate adaptation policy. Environ. Sci. Pol. 37:227–42
    [Google Scholar]
16. 16.

    Lim CH, Wong HL, Elfithri R, Teo FY. 2022. A review of stakeholder engagement in integrated river basin management. Water 14:2973
    [Google Scholar]
17. 17.

    Mees H, Crabbé A, Driessen PPJ. 2017. Conditions for citizen co-production in a resilient, efficient and legitimate flood risk governance arrangement. A tentative framework. J. Environ. Policy Plan. 19:6827–42
    [Google Scholar]
18. 18.

    Raikes J, Smith TF, Jacobson C, Baldwin C. 2019. Pre-disaster planning and preparedness for floods and droughts: a systematic review. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 38:101207
    [Google Scholar]
19. 19.

    Potočki K, Hartmann T, Slavíková L, Collentine D, Veidemane K et al. 2022. Land policy for flood risk management—toward a new working paradigm. Earth's Future 10:4e2021EF002491
    [Google Scholar]
20. 20.

    UNEP (U. N. Environ. Prog.) 2020. Nature-based solutions for adaptation. Adaptation Gap Report 202043–76. Nairobi, Kenya: UNEP
    [Google Scholar]
21. 21.

    Kiparsky M, Milman A, Vicuña S. 2012. Climate and water: knowledge of impacts to action on adaptation. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 37:163–94
    [Google Scholar]
22. 22.

    Biagini B, Bierbaum R, Stults M, Dobardzic, McNeeley SM 2014. A typology of adaptation actions: a global look at climate adaptation actions financed through the Global Environment Facility. Glob. Environ. Change 25:97–108
    [Google Scholar]
23. 23.

    Milman A, Warner BP, Chapman DA, Gianotti AGS. 2018. Identifying and quantifying landowner perspectives on integrated flood risk management. J. Flood Risk Manag. 11:134–47
    [Google Scholar]
24. 24.

    Turner B, Devisscher T, Chabaneix N, Woroniecki S, Messier C, Seddon N. 2022. The role of nature-based solutions in supporting social-ecological resilience for climate change adaptation. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour 47:123–48
    [Google Scholar]
25. 25.

    Okumah M, Martin-Ortega J, Novo P, Chapman PJ. 2020. Revisiting the determinants of pro-environmental behaviour to inform land management policy: a meta-analytic structural equation model application. Land 9:135135
    [Google Scholar]
26. 26.

    Paré G, Trudel MC, Jaana M, Kitsiou S. 2015. Synthesizing information systems knowledge: a typology of literature reviews. Inf. Manag. 52:2183–99
    [Google Scholar]
27. 27.

    Allan RP, Barlow M, Byrne MP, Cherchi A, Douville H et al. 2020. Advances in understanding large-scale responses of the water cycle to climate change. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1472:49–75
    [Google Scholar]
28. 28.

    Wenguang Z, Wenjuan W, Guanglei H, Chao G, Ming J, Xianguo L. 2020. Cooling effects of different wetlands in semi-arid rural region of Northeast China. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 141:1/231–41
    [Google Scholar]
29. 29.

    Tan X, Liu S, Tian Y, Zhou Z, Wang Y et al. 2022. Impacts of climate change and land use/cover change on regional hydrological processes: case of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. Front. Environ. Sci. 9:783324
    [Google Scholar]
30. 30.

    Bell CD, Wolfand JM, Panos CL, Bhaskar AS, Gilliom RL et al. 2020. Stormwater control impacts on runoff volume and peak flow: a meta-analysis of watershed modelling studies. Hydrol. Process 34:143134–52
    [Google Scholar]
31. 31.

    Gregory JH, Dukes MD, Jones PH, Mitter GL. 2006. Effect of urban soil compaction on infiltration rate. J. Soil Water Conserv. 61:3117–24
    [Google Scholar]
32. 32.

    Basche AD, DeLonge MS. 2019. Comparing infiltration rates in soils managed with conventional and alternative farming methods: a meta-analysis. PLOS ONE 14:9e0215702
    [Google Scholar]
33. 33.

    Ghestem M, Sidle RC, Stokes A. 2011. The influence of plant root systems on subsurface flow: implications for slope stability. BioScience 61:11869–79
    [Google Scholar]
34. 34.

    Collentine D, Futter MN. 2018. Realising the potential of natural water retention measures in catchment flood management: trade-offs and matching interests. J. Flood Risk Manag. 11:176–84
    [Google Scholar]
35. 35.

    Jamil I, Jun W, Mughal B, Waheed J, Hussain H, Waseem M. 2021. Agricultural Innovation: a comparative analysis of economic benefits gained by farmers under climate resilient and conventional agricultural practices. Land Use Policy 108:105581
    [Google Scholar]
36. 36.

    Rahut DB, Aryal JP, Marenya P. 2021. Ex-ante adaptation strategies for climate challenges in sub-Saharan Africa: Macro and micro perspectives. Environ. Chall. 3:100035
    [Google Scholar]
37. 37.

    McCarthy N, Kilic T, Brubaker J, Murray S, de la Fuente A. 2021. Droughts and floods in Malawi: impacts on crop production and the performance of sustainable land management practices under weather extremes. Environ. Develop. Econ. 26:5/6432–49
    [Google Scholar]
38. 38.

    Oyekale TO, Oyekale AS. 2019. Endogenous-switching regression modeling of farmers' exposure to climate hazards and reforestation in selected villages in Africa. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1378:032018
    [Google Scholar]
39. 39.

    Akinyi DP, Ng'ang'a SK, Girvetz EH 2021. Trade-offs and synergies of climate change adaptation strategies among smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. Reg. Sustain. 2:2130–43
    [Google Scholar]
40. 40.

    Nguyen AT, Hens L. 2021. Diversified responses to contemporary pressures on sloping agricultural land: Thai farmer's perception of mountainous landscapes in northern Vietnam. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 23:45411–29
    [Google Scholar]
41. 41.

    Kalele DN, Ogara WO, Oludhe C, Onono JO. 2021. Climate change impacts and relevance of smallholder farmers’ response in arid and semi-arid lands in Kenya. Sci. Afr. 12:e00814
    [Google Scholar]
42. 42.

    Abubakar A, Ishak MY, Makmom AA. 2021. Impacts of and adaptation to climate change on the oil palm in Malaysia: a systematic review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 28:3954339–61
    [Google Scholar]
43. 43.

    Arora A, Birwal D. 2017. Natural calamities, crop losses and coping strategies: an economic analysis from Odisha. Indian J. Agric. Econ. 72:3385–95
    [Google Scholar]
44. 44.

    Gooden J, Pritzlaff R. 2021. Dryland watershed restoration with rock detention structures: a nature-based solution to mitigate drought, erosion, flooding, and atmospheric carbon. Front. Environ. Sci. 9:679189
    [Google Scholar]
45. 45.

    Amede T, Van den Akker E, Berdel W, Keller C, Tilahun G et al. 2020. Facilitating livelihoods diversification through flood-based land restoration in pastoral systems of Afar, Ethiopia. Renew. Agric. Food Syst. 37:S1S43–54
    [Google Scholar]
46. 46.

    Castonguay AC, Urich C, Iftekhar MS, Deletic A. 2018. Modelling urban water management transitions: a case of rainwater harvesting. Environ. Model. Softw. 105:270–85
    [Google Scholar]
47. 47.

    Gawai S, Sen V 2016. Environment security and Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme. Climate Change Challenge (3C) and Social-Economic-Ecological Interface-Building. Environmental Science and Engineering S Nautiyal, R Schaldach, K Raju, H Kaechele, B Pritchard, K Rao 315–23. Cham, Switz.: Springer
    [Google Scholar]
48. 48.

    Tessema I, Simane B. 2021. Smallholder Farmers’ perception and adaptation to climate variability and change in Fincha sub-basin of the Upper Blue Nile River Basin of Ethiopia. GeoJournal 86:41767–83
    [Google Scholar]
49. 49.

    Choosuk C, Khunwishit S, Chevakidagarn P. 2021. Climate change impacts and adaptation of households in U-Tapao River Sub-Basin, Thailand. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. Plan. 16:61091–99
    [Google Scholar]
50. 50.

    Khanal U, Wilson C, Lee B, Hoang VN. 2018. Smallholder farmers’ participation in climate change adaptation programmes: understanding preferences in Nepal. Clim. Policy 18:7916–27
    [Google Scholar]
51. 51.

    Rolfe J, Perry L, Long P, Frazer C, Beutel T, Tincknell J, Phelps D. 2021. GrazingFutures: learnings from a contemporary collaborative extension program in rangeland communities of western Queensland, Australia. Rangel. J. 43:3173–83
    [Google Scholar]
52. 52.

    Rao CS, Gopinath KA, Prasad JVNS, Prasannakumar Singh AK. 2016. Chapter Four - Climate resilient villages for sustainable food security in tropical India: concept, process, technologies, institutions, and impacts. Adv. Agron. 140:101–214
    [Google Scholar]
53. 53.

    Ali SM, Khalid B, Akhter, Islam A, Adnan S 2020. Analyzing the occurrence of floods and droughts in connection with climate change in Punjab province, Pakistan. Nat. Hazards 103:32533–59
    [Google Scholar]
54. 54.

    Mahaarcha W. 2019. Factors influencing farmers' adaptation strategies to climate change in Bophloi district, Kanchanaburi province, Thailand. Humanit. Arts Soc. Sci. Stud. 19:170–86
    [Google Scholar]
55. 55.

    Ayeb-Karlsson S, van der Geest K, Ahmed I, Huq S, Warner K 2016. A people-centred perspective on climate change, environmental stress, and livelihood resilience in Bangladesh. Sustain. Sci. 11:4679–94
    [Google Scholar]
56. 56.

    Macháč J, Brabec J, Hekrle M, Vacková A 2021. What nature-based flood protection solutions are best perceived by people? Lessons from field research in Czechia. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, Vol. 107 Nature-Based Solutions for Flood Mitigation CSS Ferreira, Z Kalantari, T Hartmann, P Pereira 425–46. Cham, Switz.: Springer
    [Google Scholar]
57. 57.

    Thorslund J, Jarsjo J, Jaramillo F, Jawitz JW, Manzoni S et al. 2017. Wetlands as large-scale nature-based solutions: status and challenges for research, engineering and management. Ecol. Eng. 108:Part B489–97
    [Google Scholar]
58. 58.

    Tscharntke T, Clough Y, Bhagwat SA, Buchori D, Faust H et al. 2011. Multifunctional shade-tree management in tropical agroforestry landscapes—a review. J. Appl. Ecol. 48:3619–29
    [Google Scholar]
59. 59.

    Quandt A, Neufeldt H, McCabe JT. 2017. The role of agroforestry in building livelihood resilience to floods and drought in semiarid Kenya. Ecol. Soc. 22:310
    [Google Scholar]
60. 60.

    Fahad S, Chavan SB, Chichaghare AR, Uthappa AR, Kumar M et al. 2022. Agroforestry systems for soil health improvement and maintenance. Sustainability 14:2214877
    [Google Scholar]
61. 61.

    Ghale B, Mitra E, Sodhi HS, Verma AK, Kumar S 2022. Carbon sequestration potential of agroforestry systems and its potential in climate change mitigation. Water Air Soil Pollut 233:7228
    [Google Scholar]
62. 62.

    Higgins D, Balint T, Liversage H, Winters P. 2018. Investigating the impacts of increased rural land tenure security: a systematic review of the evidence. J. Rural Stud. 61:34–62
    [Google Scholar]
63. 63.

    Katusiime J, Schuett B. 2020. Linking land tenure and integrated watershed management—a review. Sustainability 12:41667
    [Google Scholar]
64. 64.

    Murken L, Gornott C. 2022. The importance of different land tenure systems for farmers’ response to climate change: a systematic review. Clim. Risk Manag. 35:100419
    [Google Scholar]
65. 65.

    Musinguzi M, Huber T, Kirumira D, Drate P. 2021. Assessment of the land inventory approach for securing tenure of lawful and bona fide occupants on private Mailo land in Uganda. Land Use Policy 110:104562
    [Google Scholar]
66. 66.

    Kenfack Essougong UP, Teguia SJM 2019. How secure are land rights in Cameroon?. A review of the evolution of land tenure system and its implications on tenure security and rural livelihoods. GeoJournal 84:1645–56
    [Google Scholar]
67. 67.

    Fanadzo M, Ncube B. 2018. Challenges and opportunities for revitalising smallholder irrigation schemes in South Africa. Water SA 44:3436–47
    [Google Scholar]
68. 68.

    Arora P, Bert F, Podesta G, Krantz DH. 2015. Ownership effect in the wild: influence of land ownership on agribusiness goals and decisions in the Argentine Pampas. J. Behav. Exp. Econ. 58:162–70
    [Google Scholar]
69. 69.

    Kumari R, Nakano Y. 2016. Does land lease tenure insecurity cause decreased productivity and investment in the sugar industry? Evidence from Fiji. Aust. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 60:3406–21
    [Google Scholar]
70. 70.

    Parker DP, Thurman NW. 2019. Private land conservation and public policy: land trusts, land owners, and conservation easements. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 11:337–54
    [Google Scholar]
71. 71.

    Notess L, Veit P, Monterroso I, Andiko, Sulle E et al. 2021. Community land formalization and company land acquisition procedures: a review of 33 procedures in 15 countries. Land Use Policy 110:104461
    [Google Scholar]
72. 72.

    Tompkins EL, Eakin H. 2012. Managing private and public adaptation to climate change. Glob. Environ. Change 22:13–11
    [Google Scholar]
73. 73.

    Gezie M. 2019. Farmer's response to climate change and variability in Ethiopia: a review. Cogent Food Agric 5:1
    [Google Scholar]
74. 74.

    Salazar-Espinoza C, Jones S, Tarp F. 2015. Weather shocks and cropland decisions in rural Mozambique. Food Policy 53:9–21
    [Google Scholar]
75. 75.

    Slavíková L, Raška P 2019. This is my land! Privately funded natural water retention measures in the Czech Republic. Nature-Based Flood Risk Management on Private Land T Hartmann, L Slavíková, S McCarthy 55–67. Cham, Switz.: Springer
    [Google Scholar]
76. 76.

    Brown PC. 2018. Property rights that ‘work’ in the face of disaster: per share joint ownership of arable in early modern and modern Japan. Glob. Environ. 11:2258–93
    [Google Scholar]
77. 77.

    Sutherland LA, Barnes A, McCrum G, Blackstock K, Toma L. 2011. Towards a cross-sectoral analysis of land use decision-making in Scotland. Landsc. Urban Plan. 100:1–21–10
    [Google Scholar]
78. 78.

    Gutman J 2019. Commentary: urban wetlands restoration as NBS for flood risk mitigation: from positive case to legitimate practice, in the view of evidence-based flood risk policy making. Nature-Based Flood Risk Management on Private Land T Hartmann, L Slavíková, S McCarthy 127–34. Cham, Switz.: Springer
    [Google Scholar]
79. 79.

    Liefferink D, Wiering M, Crabbe A, Hegger D. 2018. Explaining stability and change. Comparing flood risk governance in Belgium, France, the Netherlands, and Poland. J. Flood Risk Manag. 11:3281–90
    [Google Scholar]
80. 80.

    Bisaro A, de Bel M, Hinkel J, Kok S, Bouwer LM. 2020. Leveraging public adaptation finance through urban land reclamation: cases from Germany, the Netherlands and the Maldives. Clim. Change 160:4671–89
    [Google Scholar]
81. 81.

    Slavíková L, Raška P, Kopáček M. 2019. Mayors and “their” land: revealing approaches to flood risk management in small municipalities. J. Flood Risk Manag. 12:3e12474
    [Google Scholar]
82. 82.

    Fandohan B, Sanchez AC. 2014. Local perceptions of climate change and its impacts on indigenous fruit trees: water, adaptation and sustainability in Benin. Adaptation to Climate Change through Water Resources Management D Stucker, E Lopez-Gunn London: Routledge https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780203085875-11/local-perceptions-climate-change-impacts-indigenous-fruit-trees-belarmain-fandohan-aida-cuni-sanchez?context=ubx&refId=ea5b42d0-27b8-448e-b370-70c5f615796d
    [Google Scholar]
83. 83.

    Tsonkova P, Mirck J, Böhm C, Fütz B. 2018. Addressing farmer-perceptions and legal constraints to promote agroforestry in Germany. Agrofor. Syst. 92:41091–103
    [Google Scholar]
84. 84.

    Bark RH. 2021. Designing a flood storage option on agricultural land: What can flood risk managers learn from drought management?. Water 13:182604
    [Google Scholar]
85. 85.

    Wilkinson ME 2019. Commentary: Mr. Pitek's land from a perspective of managing hydrological extremes: challenges in upscaling and transferring knowledge. Nature-Based Flood Risk Management on Private Land T Hartmann, L Slavíková, S McCarthy 69–75. Cham, Switz.: Springer
    [Google Scholar]
86. 86.

    Bawa A, Perez-Gutierrez JD, Kumar S. 2021. Simulating hydrological responses of integrated crop-livestock systems under future climate changes in an agricultural watershed. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 57:3474–92
    [Google Scholar]
87. 87.

    Kaur G, Singh G, Motavalli PP, Nelson KA, Orlowski JM et al. 2020. Impacts and management strategies for crop production in waterlogged or flooded soils: a review. J. Agron. 112:31475–501
    [Google Scholar]
88. 88.

    Sklenicka P. 2016. Classification of farmland ownership fragmentation as a cause of land degradation: a review on typology, consequences, and remedies. Land Use Policy 57:694–701
    [Google Scholar]
89. 89.

    Ricart S, Castelletti A, Gandolfi C. 2022. On farmers’ perceptions of climate change and its nexus with climate data and adaptive capacity. A comprehensive review. Environ. Res. Lett. 17:8083002
    [Google Scholar]
90. 90.

    Williams PA, Crespo O, Abu M, Simpson NP. 2018. A systematic review of how vulnerability of smallholder agricultural systems to changing climate is assessed in Africa. Environ. Res. Lett. 13:10103004
    [Google Scholar]
91. 91.

    Adger WN. 2006. Vulnerability. Glob. Environ. Change 16:3268–81
    [Google Scholar]
92. 92.

    Williams C, Fenton A, Huq S. 2015. Knowledge and adaptive capacity. Nat. Clim. Change 5:82–83
    [Google Scholar]
93. 93.

    Mortreux C, Barnett J. 2017. Adaptive capacity: exploring the research frontier. WIREs Clim. Change 8:e467
    [Google Scholar]
94. 94.

    Shukla R, Agarwal A, Gornott C, Sachdeva K, Joshi PK. 2019. Farmer typology to understand differentiated climate change adaptation in Himalaya. Sci. Rep. 9:20375
    [Google Scholar]
95. 95.

    Fahad S, Wang J. 2018. Farmers’ risk perception, vulnerability, and adaptation to climate change in rural Pakistan. Land Use Policy 79:301–9
    [Google Scholar]
96. 96.

    Asibey MO, Abubakari M, Peprah C. 2019. Vulnerability and urban farming: coping with price volatility in Ejisu-Juaben municipality, Ghana. Cogent Food Agric 5:11594504
    [Google Scholar]
97. 97.

    Malatinszky Á. 2016. Stakeholder perceptions of climate extremes’ effects on management of protected grasslands in a central European area. Weather Clim. Soc. 8:3209–17
    [Google Scholar]
98. 98.

    Grothmann T, Patt A. 2005. Adaptive capacity and human cognition: the process of individual adaptation to climate change. Glob. Environ. Change A 15:3199–213
    [Google Scholar]
99. 99.

    Eyster HN, Satterfield T, Chan KMA. 2022. Why people do what they do: an interdisciplinary synthesis of human action theories. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 47:725–51
    [Google Scholar]
100. 100.

     Smith A. 2000 (1776). The Wealth of Nations. New York: Modern Library
101. 101.

     Pangapanga PI, Jumbe CB, Kanyanda S, Thangalimodzi L. 2012. Unravelling strategic choices towards droughts and floods’ adaptation in Southern Malawi. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2:57–66
     [Google Scholar]
102. 102.

     Ajzen I. 1985. From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. Action Control: From Cognition To Behavior IJ Kuhl, J Beckmann 11–39. Berlin: Springer-Verlag
     [Google Scholar]
103. 103.

     Holt JR, Butler BJ, Borsuk ME, Markowski-Lindsay M, MacLean MG et al. 2021. Using the Theory of Planned Behavior to understand family forest owners’ intended responses to invasive forest insects. Soc. Nat. Resour. 34:81001–18
     [Google Scholar]
104. 104.

     Rogers RW. 1975. A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change. J. Psychol. 91:193–114
     [Google Scholar]
105. 105.

     Cialdini R, Reno R, Kallgren C. 1990. A focus theory of normative conduct: recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 58:61015–26
     [Google Scholar]
106. 106.

     Steg L, Vlek C. 2009. Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: an integrative review and research agenda. J. Environ. Psychol. 29:3309–17
     [Google Scholar]
107. 107.

     Steward J. 1955. Theory of Culture Change Champagne, IL: Univ. Ill. Press
108. 108.

     Ali AMS. 1995. Population pressure, environmental constraints and agricultural change in Bangladesh: examples from three agroecosystems. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 55:295–109
     [Google Scholar]
109. 109.

     Stern PC. 2000. Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. J. Soc. Issues 56:3407–24
     [Google Scholar]
110. 110.

     Moore HE, Boldero J. 2017. Designing interventions that last: a classification of environmental behaviors in relation to the activities, costs, and effort involved for adoption and maintenance. Front. Psychol. 8:1874
     [Google Scholar]
111. 111.

     Stern PC, Oskamp S 1987. Managing scarce environmental resources. Handbook of Environmental Psychology D Stokols, I Altman 1044–88. New York: Wiley
     [Google Scholar]
112. 112.

     Phuong LTH, Biesbroek GR, Sen LTH, Wals AEJ. 2018. Understanding smallholder farmers’ capacity to respond to climate change in a coastal community in Central Vietnam. Clim. Dev. 10:8701–16
     [Google Scholar]
113. 113.

     van Valkengoed AM, Steg L. 2019. Meta-analyses of factors motivating climate change adaptation behaviour. Nat. Clim. Change 9:2158–63
     [Google Scholar]
114. 114.

     Diekmann A, Preisendörfer P. 2003. Green and Greenback: the behavioral effects of environmental attitudes in low-cost and high-cost situations. Ration. Soc. 15:4441–72
     [Google Scholar]
115. 115.

     Harrington J, Tabor LK, Wilson IE. 2011. Stakeholder adaptation to climatic change in Kansas: What have we learned?. Pap. Appl. Geogr. Conf. 34:1–9
     [Google Scholar]
116. 116.

     Ahmad D, Afzal M, Rauf A. 2021. Flood hazards adaptation strategies: a gender-based disaggregated analysis of farm-dependent Bait community in Punjab, Pakistan. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 23:1865–86
     [Google Scholar]
117. 117.

     Teshager M, Adgo E, Tilahun T. 2014. Investigating the determinants of adaptation strategies to climate change: a case of Batti district, Amhara region, Ethiopia. Int. J. Agric. Res. 9:4169–86
     [Google Scholar]
118. 118.

     Moser SC, Ekstrom JA. 2010. A framework to diagnose barriers to climate change adaptation. PNAS 107:5122026–31
     [Google Scholar]
119. 119.

     Biesbroek GR, Klostermann JEM, Termeer CJAM, Kabat P. 2013. On the nature of barriers to climate change adaptation. Reg. Environ. Change 13:1119–29
     [Google Scholar]
120. 120.

     Eisenack K, Moser SC, Hoffmann E, Klein RJT, Oberlack C et al. 2014. Explaining and overcoming barriers to climate change adaptation. . Nat. Clim. Change 4:867–72
     [Google Scholar]
121. 121.

     Beckman M, Nguyen MVT. 2016. Upland development, climate-related risk and institutional conditions for adaptation in Vietnam. Clim. Dev. 8:5413–22
     [Google Scholar]
122. 122.

     Jacobi J, Bottazzi P, Pillco MI, Schneider M, Rist S 2017. Building farm resilience in a changing climate: challenges, potentials, and ways forward for smallholder cocoa production in Bolivia. Identifying Emerging Issues in Disaster Risk Reduction, Migration, Climate Change and Sustainable Development K Sudmeier-Rieux, M Fernández, I Penna, M Jaboyedoff, J Gaillard 231–47. Cham, Switz.: Springer
     [Google Scholar]
123. 123.

     Maharjan SK, Maharjan KL. 2020. Exploring perceptions and influences of local stakeholders on climate change adaptation in Central and Western Tarai, Nepal. Clim. Dev. 12:6575–89
     [Google Scholar]
124. 124.

     Wu W, Di S, Chen Q, Yang S, Pan X, Liu H. 2013. The compensation mechanism and water quality impacts of agriculture-urban water transfers: a case study in China's Chaobai watershed. Water Resour. Manag. 27:1187–97
     [Google Scholar]
125. 125.

     Holden ST, Fisher M, Katengeza S, Thierfelder C. 2018. Can lead farmers reveal the adoption potential of conservation agriculture? The case of Malawi 2018. Land Use Policy 76:113–23
     [Google Scholar]
126. 126.

     Ahmad D, Afzal M. 2020. Flood hazards and factors influencing household flood perception and mitigation strategies in Pakistan. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 27:1315375
     [Google Scholar]
127. 127.

     Blackburn J, Mooiweer H, Parks M, Hutson A. 2018. The Soil Value Exchange: unlocking nature's value via the market. Bull. At. Sci. 74:3162–69
     [Google Scholar]
128. 128.

     Williamson TB, Nelson HW. 2017. Barriers to enhanced and integrated climate change adaptation and mitigation in Canadian forest management. Can. J. For. Res. 47:121567–76
     [Google Scholar]
129. 129.

     Wingfield T, Macdonald N, Peters K, Spees J. 2021. Barriers to mainstream adoption of catchment-wide natural flood management: a transdisciplinary problem-framing study of delivery practice. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 25:6239–59
     [Google Scholar]
130. 130.

     Tuihedur Rahman HM, Hickey GM. 2019. What does autonomous adaptation to climate change have to teach public policy and planning about avoiding the risks of maladaptation in Bangladesh?. Front. Environ. Sci. 7:2
     [Google Scholar]
131. 131.

     Tangney P. 2017. Climate Adaptation Policy and Evidence: Understanding the Tensions between Politics and Expertise in Public Policy. London: Routledge. , 1st ed..
132. 132.

     Shi X, Du C, Guo X, Shi W. 2021. Heterogeneity of water-retention capacity of forest and its influencing factors based on meta-analysis in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. J. Geogr. Sci. 31:69–90
     [Google Scholar]
133. 133.

     Liu YF, Liu Y, Shi ZH, López-Vicente M, Wu GL. 2020. Effectiveness of re-vegetated forest and grassland on soil erosion control in the semi-arid Loess Plateau. Catena 195:104787
     [Google Scholar]
134. 134.

     Wahren A, Schwaerzel K, Feger KH. 2012. Potentials and limitations of natural flood retention by forested land in headwater catchments: evidence from experimental and model studies. J. Flood Risk Manag. 5:4321–35
     [Google Scholar]
135. 135.

     Biber E. 2013. The challenge of collecting and using environmental monitoring data. Ecol. Soc. 18:468
     [Google Scholar]
136. 136.

     Chausson A, Turner B, Seddon D, Chabaneix N, Girardin CAJ et al. 2020. Mapping the effectiveness of nature-based solutions for climate change adaptation. Glob. Change Biol. 26:6134–55
     [Google Scholar]
137. 137.

     Norman LM, Brinkerhoff F, Gwilliam E, Guertin DP, Callegary J et al. 2016. Hydrologic response of streams restored with check dams in the Chiricahua Mountains, Arizona. River Res. Appl. 32:4519–27
     [Google Scholar]
138. 138.

     Muttaqin A, Suntoro, Komariah. 2021. Estimation of peak runoff impact from land use change using remote sensing and GIS in Keduang sub-watershed. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 824:012005
     [Google Scholar]
139. 139.

     Hu S, Fan Y, Zhang T. 2020. Assessing the effect of land use change on surface runoff in a rapidly urbanized city: a case study of the central area of Beijing. Land 9:117
     [Google Scholar]
140. 140.

     Schilling KE, Gassman PW, Kling CL, Campbell T, Jha MK et al. 2014. The potential for agricultural land use change to reduce flood risk in a large watershed. Hydrol. Process. 28:83314–25
     [Google Scholar]
141. 141.

     Salgado Terencio DP, Sanches Fernandes LF, Vitor Cortes RM, Moura JP, Leal Pacheco FA. 2019. Can land cover changes mitigate large floods? A reflection based on partial least squares-path modeling. Water 11:4684
     [Google Scholar]
142. 142.

     Gabriels K, Willems P, Van Orshoven J. 2022. An iterative runoff propagation approach to identify priority locations for land cover change minimizing downstream river flood hazard. Landsc. Urban Plan. 218:104262
     [Google Scholar]
143. 143.

     Marrin DL. 2020. Emergent properties of water resources and associated watershed systems. Proceedings 48:118
     [Google Scholar]
144. 144.

     Rickards L, Wiseman J, Edwards T, Biggs C. 2014. The problem of fit: scenario planning and climate change adaptation in the public sector. Environ. Plan. C 32:4641–62
     [Google Scholar]
145. 145.

     Ogada MJ, Radeny M, Recha J, Dawit S. 2021. Adoption of complementary climate-smart agricultural technologies: lessons from Lushoto in Tanzania. Agric. Food Secur. 10:155
     [Google Scholar]
146. 146.

     Brondizio ES, Moran EF. 2008. Human dimensions of climate change: the vulnerability of small farmers in the Amazon. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 363:14981803–9
     [Google Scholar]
147. 147.

     Jackson LE, Wheeler SM, Hollander AD, O'Geen AT, Orlove BS et al. 2011. Case study on potential agricultural responses to climate change in a California landscape. Clim. Change 109:407–27
     [Google Scholar]
148. 148.

     Olsson L, Jerneck A. 2010. Farmers fighting climate change-from victims to agents in subsistence livelihoods. WIRES Clim. Change 1:3363–73
     [Google Scholar]
149. 149.

     Fedele G, Locatelli B, Djoudi H. 2017. Mechanisms mediating the contribution of ecosystem services to human well-being and resilience. Ecosyst. Serv. 28:43–54
     [Google Scholar]
150. 150.

     Pescaroli G, Alexander D. 2018. Understanding compound, interconnected, interacting, and cascading risks: a holistic framework. Risk Anal 38:112245–57
     [Google Scholar]
151. 151.

     Debele SE, Kumar P, Sahani J, Marti-Cardona B, Mickovski SB et al. 2019. Nature-based solutions for hydro-meteorological hazards: revised concepts, classification schemes and databases. Environ. Res. 179:Part B108799
     [Google Scholar]
152. 152.

     Ritchie H, Roser M. 2019. Land use. Our World in Data Sept. https://ourworldindata.org/land-use
     [Google Scholar]
153. 153.

     Lowder S, Raney T, Skoet J. 2014. The global distribution of smallholder and family farms. CGAP Oct. 9. https://www.cgap.org/blog/global-distribution-smallholder-and-family-farms
     [Google Scholar]