1932

Abstract

Since prehistory, literature and the arts have been drawn to portrayals of physical environments and human-environment interactions. The modern environmentalist movement as it emerged first in the late-nineteenth century and, in its more recent incarnation, in the 1960s, gave rise to a rich array of fictional and nonfictional writings concerned with humans' changing relationship to the natural world. Only since the early 1990s, however, has the long-standing interest of literature studies in these matters generated the initiative most commonly known as “ecocriticism,” an eclectic and loosely coordinated movement whose contributions thus far have been most visible within its home discipline of literature but whose interests and alliances extend across various art forms and media. In such areas as the study of narrative and image, ecocriticism converges with its sister disciplines in the humanities: environmental anthropology, environmental history, and environmental philosophy. In the first two sections, we begin with a brief overview of the nature, significance, and evolution of literature-environment studies. We then summarize in more detail six specific centers of interest: () the imagination of place and place-attachment, () the enlistment and critique of models of scientific inquiry in the study of literature and the arts, () the examination of the significance of gender difference and environmental representation, () the cross-pollination of ecocritical and postcolonial scholarship as ecocriticism has extended its horizons beyond its original focus on Anglo-American imagination, () ecocriticism's evolving interest in indigenous art and thought, and () ecocri-ticism's no less keen and complex attentiveness to artistic representation and the ethics of relations between humans and animals.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-111109-144855
2011-11-21
2025-02-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/energy/36/1/annurev-environ-111109-144855.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-111109-144855&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Buell L.1.  2005. The Future of Environmental Criticism Oxford: Blackwell195 [Google Scholar]
  2. Garrard G.2.  2004. Ecocriticism London: Routledge203 [Google Scholar]
  3. Meeker J.3.  1972. The Comedy of Survival: Studies in Literary Ecology New York: Scribner's133 [Google Scholar]
  4. Ruecker W.4.  1978. Literature and ecology: an experiment in ecocriticism. Iowa Rev. 9.1:71–86 [Google Scholar]
  5. Marx L.5.  1964. The Machine in the Garden. New York: Oxford Univ. Press392 [Google Scholar]
  6. Williams R.6.  1973. The Country and the City. London: Chatto & Windus335 [Google Scholar]
  7. Gifford T.7.  1999. Pastoral London: Routledge186 [Google Scholar]
  8. Buell L.8.  1995. The Environmental Imagination Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press586 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bate J.9.  1991. Romantic Ecology: Wordsworth and the Environmental Tradition London: Routledge131 [Google Scholar]
  10. Kroeber K.10.  1994. Ecological Literary Criticism: Romantic Imagining and the Biology of Mind New York: Columbia Univ. Press185 [Google Scholar]
  11. Oerlemans O.11.  2002. Romanticism and the Materiality of Nature. Toronto: Toronto: Univ. Toronto Press253 [Google Scholar]
  12. Elder J.12.  1985. Imagining the Earth: Poetry and the Vision of Nature Athens, GA: Univ. Ga. Press246, 2nd. ed. [Google Scholar]
  13. Gifford T.13.  1995. Green Voices: Understanding Contemporary Nature Poetry Manchester: Manchester Univ. Press198 [Google Scholar]
  14. McCusick J.14.  2000. Green Writing: Romanticism and Ecology. New York: St. Martin's261 [Google Scholar]
  15. Fritzell P.15.  1990. Nature Writing and America: Essays upon a Cultural Type Ames: Iowa State Univ. Press354 [Google Scholar]
  16. Slovic S.16.  1992. Seeking Awareness in American Nature Writing. Salt Lake City: Univ. Utah Press203 [Google Scholar]
  17. Glotfelty C, Fromm H. 17.  1996. The Ecocriticism Reader. Athens, GA: Univ. Ga. Press415 [Google Scholar]
  18. Coupe L. 18.  2000. The Green Studies Reader. London: Routledge315 [Google Scholar]
  19. Adamson J, Evans MM, Stein R. 19.  2002. The Environmental Justice Reader. Tucson: Univ Ariz. Press395 [Google Scholar]
  20. Naess A.20.  1973. The shallow and the deep, long-range ecology movement. Inquiry 16:95–100 [Google Scholar]
  21. Harrison R.21.  1993. Forests: The Shadow of Civilization. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press288 [Google Scholar]
  22. Westling L.22.  1999. Virginia Woolf and the flesh of the world. New Literary Hist. 30:855–76 [Google Scholar]
  23. Bate J.23.  2000. The Song of the Earth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press336 [Google Scholar]
  24. Bennett M, Teague D. 24.  1999. The Nature of Cities. Tucson: Univ. Ariz. Press311 [Google Scholar]
  25. Dixon T. 25.  2002. City Wilds. Athens, GA: Univ. Ga. Press311 [Google Scholar]
  26. Buell L.26.  2001. Writing for an Endangered World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press365 [Google Scholar]
  27. Morton T.27.  2007. Ecology without Nature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press249 [Google Scholar]
  28. Morton T.28.  2010. The Ecological Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press163 [Google Scholar]
  29. Heise U.29.  2008. Sense of Place and Sense of Planet: The Environmental Imagination of the Global. New York: Oxford Univ. Press250 [Google Scholar]
  30. Handley G.30.  2007. New World Poetics. Athens, GA: Univ. Ga. Press442 [Google Scholar]
  31. Mayer S. 31.  2003. Restoring the Connection to the Natural World: Essays on the African American Environmental Imagination Hamburg: LIT198 [Google Scholar]
  32. Outka P.32.  2008. Race and Nature from Transcendentalism to the Harlem Renaissance. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan266 [Google Scholar]
  33. Finseth I. 33.  2009. Shades of Green: Visions of Place in the Literature of American Slavery. Athens, GA: Univ. Ga. Press348 [Google Scholar]
  34. Ruffin K.34.  2010. Black on Earth: African American Ecoliterary Traditions. Athens, GA: Univ. Ga. Press212 [Google Scholar]
  35. Siewers A.35.  2009. Strange Beauty: Ecocritical Approaches to Early Medieval Landscape. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan224 [Google Scholar]
  36. Rudd G.36.  2007. Greenery: Ecocritical Readings of Late Medieval Literature. Manchester: Manchester Univ. Press221 [Google Scholar]
  37. Watson R.37.  2006. Back to Nature: The Green and the Real in the Late Renaissance. Philadelphia: Univ. Penn. Press436 [Google Scholar]
  38. McColley D.38.  2007. Poetry and Ecology in the Age of Milton and Marvell. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate252 [Google Scholar]
  39. Killingsworth MJ, Palmer J. 39.  1992. Ecospeak: Rhetoric and Environmental Politics in America. Carbondale: S. Illinois Univ. Press312 [Google Scholar]
  40. Herndl C, Brown C. 40.  1996. Green Culture: Environmental Rhetoric in Contemporary America. Madison: Univ. Wisc. Press315 [Google Scholar]
  41. DeLuca K.41.  1999. Image Politics: The New Rhetoric of Environmental Activism. New York: Guilford203 [Google Scholar]
  42. Buell F.42.  2003. From Apocalypse to Way of Life: Environmental Crisis in the American Century. London: Routledge390 [Google Scholar]
  43. Kosek J.43.  2006. Understories: The Political Life of Forests in Northern New Mexico. Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press380 [Google Scholar]
  44. Dobrin S, Kidd K. 44.  2004. Wild Things: Children's Literature and Ecocriticism. Detroit, MI: Wayne State Univ. Press308 [Google Scholar]
  45. Moore B.45.  2008. Ecology and Literature: Ecocentric Personification from Antiquity to the Twenty-First Century. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan247 [Google Scholar]
  46. Fletcher A.46.  2004. A New Theory for American Poetry. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press316 [Google Scholar]
  47. Fuchs E, Chaudhuri U. 47.  2002. Land/Scape/Theater. Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press390 [Google Scholar]
  48. Slovic S.48.  1994. Ecocriticism, storytelling, values, communication, contact http://www.asle.umn.edu/conf/other_conf/wla/1994/slovic.html [Google Scholar]
  49. Marshall I.49.  2003. Peak Experiences: Walking Meditations on Literature, Nation, and Need. Charlottesville: Univ. Press Va.267 [Google Scholar]
  50. Adamson J.50.  2001. American Indian Literature, Environmental Justice, and Ecocriticism: The Middle Place. Tucson: Univ. Ariz. Press213 [Google Scholar]
  51. Phillips D.51.  2003. The Truth of Ecology: Nature, Culture, and Literature in America. New York: Oxford Univ. Press300 [Google Scholar]
  52. Alaimo S.52.  2010. Bodily Natures: Science, Environment, and the Material Self Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press193 [Google Scholar]
  53. Berry W.53.  1977. The Unsettling of America San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club.228 [Google Scholar]
  54. Berry W.54.  1983. Standing by Words San Francisco, CA: North Point.213 [Google Scholar]
  55. Snyder G.55.  1990. The Practice of the Wild San Francisco, CA: North Point.190 [Google Scholar]
  56. Snyder G.56.  1995. A Place in Space Washington, DC: Counterpoint263 [Google Scholar]
  57. McGinnis M. 57.  1999. Bioregionalism London: Routledge231 [Google Scholar]
  58. Peck H.58.  1990. Thoreau's Morning Work New Haven: Yale Univ. Press194 [Google Scholar]
  59. Elder J.59.  1998. Reading the Mountains of Home Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press253 [Google Scholar]
  60. Holmes S.60.  1999. The Young John Muir: An Environmental Biography. Madison: Univ. Wisc. Press309 [Google Scholar]
  61. Kerridge R.61.  2001. Ecological Hardy. Beyond Nature Writing: Expanding the Boundaries of Ecocriticism K Armbruster, KR Wallace 126–42 Charlottesville: Univ. Press Va. [Google Scholar]
  62. Tallmadge J.62.  2004. The Cincinnati Arch: Learning from Nature in the City Athens, GA: Univ. Ga. Press226 [Google Scholar]
  63. Peña DG.63.  2002. Endangered landscapes and disappearing peoples? Identity, place, and community in ecological politics. See Ref. 19 58–81
  64. Comfort S.64.  2002. Struggle in Ogoniland: Ken Saro-Wiwa and the cultural politics of environmental justice. See Ref. 19 229–46
  65. Thomashow M.65.  2004. Bringing the Biosphere Home: Learning to Perceive Global Environmental Change Cambridge, MA: MIT Press244 [Google Scholar]
  66. Beck U.66.  1999. World Risk Society Cambridge, UK: Polity Press184 [Google Scholar]
  67. Nixon R.67.  2005. Environmentalism and postcolonialism. Postcolonial Studies and Beyond A Loomba, S Kaul, M Bunzl, A Burton, J Esty 233–51 Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  68. O'Brien S.68.  2001. Articulating a world of difference: ecocriticism, postcolonialism and globalization. Can. Lit. 170–71:140–58 [Google Scholar]
  69. Carroll J.69.  204. Literary Darwinism: Evolution, Human Nature, and Literature New York: Routledge276 [Google Scholar]
  70. Love G.70.  2003. Practical Ecocriticism: Literature, Biology, and the Environment. Charlottesville: Univ. Press Va.212 [Google Scholar]
  71. Boyd B.71.  2009. On the Origin of Stories: Evolution, Cognition, and Fiction Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press640 [Google Scholar]
  72. Gottschall J, Wilson D. 72.  2005. The Literary Animal: Evolution and the Nature of Narrative. Evanston, IL: Northwestern Univ. Press304 [Google Scholar]
  73. Sugiyama M.73.  2001. Narrative theory and function: why evolution matters. Philos. Lit. 25:233–50 [Google Scholar]
  74. Bryson S. 74.  2002. Ecopoetry: A Critical Introduction Salt Lake City: Univ. Utah Press272 [Google Scholar]
  75. Scigaj L.75.  1999. Sustainable Poetry: Four American Ecopoets Lexington: Univ. Press Kentucky311 [Google Scholar]
  76. Cohen M.76.  2004. Blues in the green: ecocriticism under critique. Environ. Hist. 9:9–36 [Google Scholar]
  77. Worster D.77.  1994. Nature's Economy: A History of Ecological Ideas Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press505, 2nd. ed. [Google Scholar]
  78. White R.78.  1990. Environmental history, ecology, and meaning. J. Am. Hist. 76:1111–16 [Google Scholar]
  79. Sandilands C.79.  1999. The Good-Natured Feminist: Ecofeminism and the Quest for Democracy Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press244 [Google Scholar]
  80. Mortimer-Sandilands C, Erickson B. 80.  2010. Sex, Nature, Politics, Desire Bloomington: Univ. Indiana Press410 [Google Scholar]
  81. Takacs D.81.  1996. The Idea of Biodiversity: Philosophies of Paradise Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press393 [Google Scholar]
  82. Deitering C.82.  1996. The postnatural novel: toxic consciousness in fiction of the 1980s. See Ref. 17 196–203
  83. Waddell C. 83.  2000. And No Birds Sing: Rhetorical Analyses of Rachel Carson's Silent Spring Carbondale: S. Illinois Univ. Press232 [Google Scholar]
  84. Page T.84.  2008. The problem of the land is the problem of the woman: a genealogy of ecofeminism at Grailville. PhD thesis Harvard Univ. Cambridge, MA:321 [Google Scholar]
  85. Rosser S. 85.  2008. Women, Science, and Myth: Gender Beliefs from Antiquity to the Present Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO502 [Google Scholar]
  86. Merchant C.86.  1995. Earthcare: Women and the Environment New York: Routledge280 [Google Scholar]
  87. Salleh A.87.  1989. Stirrings of a new renaissance. Island 38:26–31 [Google Scholar]
  88. Hay P.88.  2002. Main Currents in Western Environmental Thought Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press400 [Google Scholar]
  89. Wall D. 89.  1994. Green History: A Reader in Environmental Literature, Philosophy and Politics. London: Routledge273 [Google Scholar]
  90. Gaard G, Murphy PD. 90.  1998. Introduction. Ecofeminist Literary Criticism: Theory, Interpretation, Pedagogy G Gaard, P Murphy 1–13 Urbana: Univ. Illinois Press [Google Scholar]
  91. Ortner S.91.  1974. Is female to male as nature is to culture?. Woman, Culture, and Society M Rosaldo, L Lamphere 68–87 Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  92. Spretnak C.92.  1989. Towards an ecofeminist spirituality. Healing the Wounds: The Promise of Ecofeminism J Plant 127–52 London: Green Print [Google Scholar]
  93. Alaimo S.93.  2000. Undomesticated Ground: Recasting Nature as Feminist Space Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press225 [Google Scholar]
  94. Mellor M.94.  2009. Ecofeminist political economy and the politics of money. Eco-Sufficiency and Global Justice A Salleh 251–69 New York: Pluto [Google Scholar]
  95. Quartarone L.95.  2002. Pietas, furor, and ecofeminism in the Aeneid. Approaches to Teaching Vergil's Aeneid W Anderson, L Quartone 147–58 New York: Modern Lang. Assoc. Am. [Google Scholar]
  96. Kolodny A.96.  The Land Before Her: Fantasy and Experience of the American Frontiers, 1630 1860. Chapel Hill: Univ. N. Carolina Press293 [Google Scholar]
  97. Crosby A.97.  1986. Ecological Imperialism: Biological Expansion of Europe, 9001900 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press368 [Google Scholar]
  98. Grove R.98.  1995. Green Imperialism: Colonial Expansion, Tropical Island Edens, and the Origins of Environmentalism, 16001860 New York: Cambridge Univ. Press540 [Google Scholar]
  99. Bewell A.99.  1999. Romanticism and Colonial Disease. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press373 [Google Scholar]
  100. Morton T.100.  2000. The Poetics of Spice: Romantic Consumerism and the Exotic. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press282 [Google Scholar]
  101. Huggan G.101.  2004. “Greening” postcolonialism: ecocritical perspectives. Modern Fiction Stud. 50:701–33 [Google Scholar]
  102. Marzec RP. 102.  2007. An Ecological and Postcolonial Study of Literature: From Daniel Defoe to Salman Rushdie New York: Palgrave-Macmillan200 [Google Scholar]
  103. Huggan G, Tiffin H. 103.  2010. Postcolonial Ecocriticism: Literature, Animals, Environment London: Routledge245 [Google Scholar]
  104. Wright L.104.  2010. “Wilderness into Civilized Shapes”: Reading the Postcolonial Environment Athens: Univ. Ga. Press213 [Google Scholar]
  105. DeLoughrey E, Gosson R, Handley G. 105.  2005. Caribbean Literature and the Environment: Between Nature and Culture Charlottesville: Univ. Press Va.303 [Google Scholar]
  106. Campbell C, Somerville E. 106.  2007. “What is the Earthly Paradise?” Ecocritical Responses to the Caribbean Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Schol. Publ.173 [Google Scholar]
  107. Mukherjee U.107.  2010. Postcolonial Environments: Nature, Culture, and the Contemporary Indian Novel in English London: Palgrave-Macmillan203 [Google Scholar]
  108. Volkmann L, Grimm N, Detmers I, Thomson K. 108.  2010. Local Natures, Global Responsibilities: Ecocritical Perspectives on the New English Literatures Amsterdam: Rodopi.370 [Google Scholar]
  109. Thornber K.109.  2011. Ecoambiguity: Environmental Crises and East Asian Literatures Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press In press [Google Scholar]
  110. Gannon T.110.  2009. Skylark Meets Meadowlark. Lincoln: Univ. Nebraska Press416 [Google Scholar]
  111. Krech S III. 111.  1996. The Ecological Indian: Myth and History New York: Norton.318 [Google Scholar]
  112. Kolodny A.112.  2007. Rethinking the “ecological Indian”: a Penobscot precursor. ISLE 14:1–24 [Google Scholar]
  113. Schweninger L.113.  2008. Listening to the Land: Native American Literary Responses to the Landscape. Athens, GA: Univ. Georgia Press242 [Google Scholar]
  114. Basso K.114.  1996. Wisdom Sits in Places: Landscape and Language among the Western Apache Albuquerque: Univ. New Mexico Press171 [Google Scholar]
  115. Lopez B.115.  1989. Crossing Open Ground. New York: Vintage208 [Google Scholar]
  116. Dreese D.116.  2002. Ecocriticism: Creating Self and Place in Environmental and American Indian Literatures New York: Lang.131 [Google Scholar]
  117. Abram D.117.  1996. The Spell of the Sensuous. New York: Pantheon326 [Google Scholar]
  118. Hunt A.118.  2005. In search of Anaya's carp: mapping ecological consciousness and Chicano myth. ISLE 12:179–206 [Google Scholar]
  119. Christie S.119.  2009. Plural Sovereignties and Contemporary Indigenous Literature. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan280 [Google Scholar]
  120. DeLoughrey E.120.  2007. Routes and Roots: Navigating Caribbean and Pacific Island Literatures. Honolulu: Univ. Hawai'i Press334 [Google Scholar]
  121. Adams W.121.  2004. Against Extinction: The Story of Conservation London: Earthscan311 [Google Scholar]
  122. Wilson EO.122.  1984. Biophilia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press157 [Google Scholar]
  123. Shepard P, Sanders B. 123.  1985. The Sacred Paw: The Bear in Nature, Myth, and Literature. New York: Viking243 [Google Scholar]
  124. Highfield J.124.  2006. Suckling from the crocodile's tit: wildlife and nation formation in Australian narratives. Antipodes N. Am. J. Aust. Lit. 20:127–40 [Google Scholar]
  125. Marcone J.125.  1998. De retorno a lo natural: la serpiente de oro, la “novela de la selva” y la crítica ecológica. Hispania 81:299–308 [Google Scholar]
  126. Marcone J.126.  2000. Jungle fever: Primitivism in environmentalism: Rómulo Gallegos's Canaima and the romance of the jungle. Primitivism and Identity in Latin America: Essays on Art, Literature, and Culture E Camayd-Freixas, J González 157–72 Tucson: Univ. Ariz. Press [Google Scholar]
  127. Biedler P.127.  2002. Animals and theme in Ceremony. Leslie Marmon Silko's Ceremony: A Casebook A Chavkin 17–22 Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  128. Shepard P.128.  1996. The Others: How Animals Made Us Human Washington, DC: Island374 [Google Scholar]
  129. Haraway D.129.  2003. The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness Chicago: Prickly Paradigm100 [Google Scholar]
  130. Haraway D.130.  2008. When Species Meet Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press423 [Google Scholar]
  131. Nabhan G.131.  2004. Why Some Like It Hot: Food, Genes, and Cultural Diversity Washington, DC: Island233 [Google Scholar]
  132. Wolfe C.132.  2003. Animal Rites: American Culture, the Discourse of Species, and Posthumanist Theory Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press237 [Google Scholar]
  133. Westling L.133.  1996. The Green Breast of the New World: Landscape, Gender, and American Fiction Athens: Univ. Ga. Press211 [Google Scholar]
  134. Armbruster K.134.  2004. Creating the world we must save: the paradox of television nature documentaries. Writing the Environment R Kerridge, N Sammells 218–38 London: Zed [Google Scholar]
  135. Mitman G.135.  1999. Reel Nature: America's Romance with Wildlife on Film Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press263 [Google Scholar]
  136. Whitley D.136.  2008. The Idea of Nature in Disney Animation Aldershot, UK: Ashgate154 [Google Scholar]
  137. De Waal F. 137.  1997. Are we in anthropodenial?. Discover 18:50–53 [Google Scholar]
  138. Johnson L.138.  2009. Greening the library: the fundamentals and future of ecocriticism. Choice Dec. 7–13 [Google Scholar]
  139. Hochman J.139.  1998. Green Cultural Studies: Nature in Film, Novel, and Theory. Moscow, ID Univ. Idaho Press234 [Google Scholar]
  140. Ingram D.140.  2000. Green Screen: Environmentalism and Hollywood Cinema. Exeter: Univ. Exeter Press206 [Google Scholar]
  141. Murray R, Heumann J. 141.  2009. Ecology and Popular Film. Albany: State Univ. NY Press228 [Google Scholar]
  142. Braddock A, Irmscher C. 142.  2009. A Keener Perception: Ecocritical Studies in American Art History. Tuscaloosa: Univ. Ala. Press298 [Google Scholar]
  143. Rothenberg D.143.  2002. Sudden Music: Improvisation, Sound, Nature. Atlanta: Univ. Ga. Press214 [Google Scholar]
  144. Dunaway F.144.  2003. Natural Visions: The Power of Images in American Environmental Reform. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press246 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-111109-144855
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error