1932
0

Annual Review of Environment and Resources

Volume 47, 2022

Feminist Ecologies

Abstract

In times of devastating ecological crisis, where can we find a route map to collectively halt current trends of destruction? In this review, we examine feminist studies’ recent contributions to activism and theorizing regarding extraction, emerging ecologies, and multispecies justice. By bringing in salient research from the fields of feminist political ecology, ecofeminism, and decolonial/anticolonial feminisms, we point to the ways in which feminist thought and action has opened up spaces for recognizing, envisioning, and making life-affirming ecologies rather than extractive systems of destruction. We refer to the former as emergent and emancipatory ecologies, that is, ecologies always in the process of becoming and capable of defying and subverting oppression based on gender, race, ethnicity, class, sexuality, caste, ability, species and other forms of discrimination—and, thus, capable of protecting and defending life and living worlds.

Keyword(s): decolonial/anticolonial feminisms, ecofeminism, emancipatory ecologies, emergent ecologies, feminist political ecology, multispecies justice
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-112320-092246
2022-10-17
2025-06-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/energy/47/1/annurev-environ-112320-092246.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-112320-092246&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. 1.
    Rocheleau D, Ross L, Morrobel J, Malaret L, Hernandez R, Kominiak T. 2001. Complex communities and emergent ecologies in the regional agroforest of Zambrana-Chacuey, Dominican Republic. Ecumene 8:466–92
     [Google Scholar]
  2. 2.
    Escobar A. 2021.. “ Transcending modernity”: contribution to GTI Forum “Interrogating the Anthropocene: truth and fallacy. .” Great Transition Initiative https://greattransition.org/gti-forum/anthropocene-escobar
    [Google Scholar]
  3. 3.
    Nirmal P. 2017. Disembodiment and deworlding: taking decolonial feminist political ecology to ground in Attappady, Kerala PhD Thesis Clark Univ. Worcester, MA:
     [Google Scholar]
  4. 4.
    Emel J, Nirmal P 2021. A feminist research agenda for multispecies justice. A Research Agenda for Animal Geographies A Hovorka, S McCubbin, L Van Patten 23–38 Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar
     [Google Scholar]
  5. 5.
    Nirmal P, Rocheleau D. 2019. Decolonizing degrowth in the post-development convergence: questions, experiences, and proposals from two Indigenous territories. Environ. Plann. E. 2:465–92
     [Google Scholar]
  6. 6.
    Ojeda D. 2016. Los paisajes del despojo: propuestas para un análisis desde las reconfiguraciones socioespaciales. Rev. Colomb. Antropol. 52:219–43
     [Google Scholar]
  7. 7.
    Di Chiro G. 2017. Welcome to the White (M)Anthropocene? A feminist-environmentalist critique. Routledge Handbook of Gender and Environment S MacGregor 487–504 London: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  8. 8.
    Haraway D. 2015. Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Plantationocene, Chthulucene: Making kin. Environ. Human. 6:1159–65
     [Google Scholar]
  9. 9.
    Las Canta LD. 2017. El Faloceno. Redefinir el Antropoceno desde una mirada ecofeminista. Ecol. Política 53:26–33
     [Google Scholar]
  10. 10.
    Malm A, Hornborg A. 2014. The geology of mankind? A critique of the Anthropocene narrative. Anthr. Rev. 1:162–69
     [Google Scholar]
  11. 11.
    Moore J 2016. Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, History and the Crisis of Capitalism San Francisco: PM Press
     [Google Scholar]
  12. 12.
    Tsing A. 2016. Earth stalked by man. Camb. J. Anthropol. 34:112–16
     [Google Scholar]
  13. 13.
    Holt-Giménez E. 2017. A Foodie's Guide to Capitalism: Understanding the Political Economy of What We Eat New York: Mon. Rev. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  14. 14.
    McKay B, Alonso-Fradejas A, Ezquerro-Cañete A, eds. 2021. Agrarian Extractivism in Latin America London: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  15. 15.
    Soper K. 2020. Post-Growth Living: For an Alternative Hedonism London: Verso
     [Google Scholar]
  16. 16.
    Betasamosake Simpson L. 2017. As We Have Always Done: Indigenous Freedom through Radical Resistance Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  17. 17.
    Rocheleau D. 2015. Networked, rooted and territorial: green grabbing and resistance in Chiapas. J. Peasant Stud. 42:695–723
     [Google Scholar]
  18. 18.
    Harcourt W, Nelson IL, eds. 2015. Practising Feminist Political Ecologies: Moving Beyond the ‘Green Economy’. London: Zed Books
     [Google Scholar]
  19. 19.
    EZLN (Ejército Zapatista de Liberación Nacional) 1996. Cuarta declaración de la Selva Lacandona Doc. 3 EZLN Jan. 1 Mexico City: https://enlacezapatista.ezln.org.mx/1996/01/01/cuarta-declaracion-de-la-selva-lacandona/
    [Google Scholar]
  20. 20.
    Harcourt W 2016. The Palgrave Handbook of Gender and Development: Critical Engagements in Feminist Theory and Practice New York: Springer
     [Google Scholar]
  21. 21.
    Carney J. 1993. Converting the wetlands, engendering the environment: the intersection of gender with agrarian change in The Gambia. Econ. Geogr. 69:3329–48
     [Google Scholar]
  22. 22.
    Rocheleau D, Thomas-Slater B, Wangari E, eds. 1996. Feminist Political Ecology: Global Issues and Local Experiences London: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  23. 23.
    Sultana F. 2006. Gendered waters, poisoned wells: political ecology of the arsenic crisis in Bangladesh. Fluid Bonds: Views on Gender and Water K Lahiri-Dutt 362–86 Kolkata, India: Stree Publ.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. 24.
    Cruz Hernández DT. 2016. Una mirada muy otra a los territorios-cuerpos femeninos. Solar 12:146–53
     [Google Scholar]
  25. 25.
    Daigle M. 2018. Resurging through Kishiichiwan: the spatial politics of Indigenous water relations. Decolon.: Indig. Educ. Soc. 7:1159–72
     [Google Scholar]
  26. 26.
    Merchant C. 1980. The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution New York: HarperOne
     [Google Scholar]
  27. 27.
    Plumwood V. 1993. Feminism and the Mastery of Nature London: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  28. 28.
    Ruether RR. 1995. New Woman, New Earth: Sexist Ideologies and Human Liberation Boston: Beacon Press
     [Google Scholar]
  29. 29.
    Marmon Silko L. 1977. Ceremony New York City: Viking Press
     [Google Scholar]
  30. 30.
    Diamond I, Orenstein GF, eds. 1990. Reweaving the World: The Emergence of Ecofeminism San Francisco: Sierra Club
     [Google Scholar]
  31. 31.
    Adams CJ, Gruen L, eds. 2014. Ecofeminism: Feminist Intersections with Other Animals and the Earth New York: Bloomsbury
     [Google Scholar]
  32. 32.
    Merchant C. 1989. Ecological Revolutions: Nature, Gender, and Science in New England Chapel Hill: Univ. North Carolina
     [Google Scholar]
  33. 33.
    Mies M. 1986. Patriarchy and Accumulation on a World Scale: Women in the International Division of Labour London: Zed Books
     [Google Scholar]
  34. 34.
    Bennholdt-Thomsen V, Mies M. 1999. The Subsistence Perspective: Beyond the Globalised Economy London: Zed Books
     [Google Scholar]
  35. 35.
    Federici S. 2004. Caliban and the Witch: Women, the Body and Primitive Accumulation New York: Autonomedia
     [Google Scholar]
  36. 36.
    Fraser N. 2020. Teorizar el capitalismo. Los talleres ocultos del capital: Un mapa para la izquierda13–70 Madrid, Spain: Traficantes de Sueños
     [Google Scholar]
  37. 37.
    Shiva V. 1988. Staying Alive: Women, Ecology and Development London: Zed Books
     [Google Scholar]
  38. 38.
    Seager J. 1993. Earth Follies: Feminism, Politics, and the Environment London: Earthscan
     [Google Scholar]
  39. 39.
    Schmink M. 1999. Conceptual framework for gender and community-based conservation White Pap. Manag. Ecosyst. Resour. Gender Emphasis, Tropic. Conserv. Dev. Progr., Cent. Lat. Am. Stud., Univ. Fla. Gainesville:
     [Google Scholar]
  40. 40.
    Thomas-Slayter B, Rocheleau D 1995. Gender, Environment and Development in Kenya: Perspectives from the Grassroots Boulder, CO: Lynn Rienner
     [Google Scholar]
  41. 41.
    Rocheleau D, Ross L. 1995. Trees as tools, trees as text: struggles over resources in Zambrana-Chacuey, Dominican Republic. Antipode 27:407–28
     [Google Scholar]
  42. 42.
    Schroeder R. 1999. Shady Practices: Agroforestry and Gender Politics in The Gambia Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  43. 43.
    Wolch J, Emel J, eds. 1998. Animal Geographies: Place, Politics, and Identity in the Nature-Culture Borderlands London: Verso
     [Google Scholar]
  44. 44.
    Roth R. 2009. The challenges of mapping complex indigenous spatiality: from abstract space to dwelling space. Cult. Geogr. 16:207–27
     [Google Scholar]
  45. 45.
    Manzi M 2020. Fighting against or coexisting with drought? Conviviality, inequality, and peasant mobility in Northeast Brazil. Convivial Constellations in Latin America: From Colonial to Contemporary Times L Scarato, F Baldraia, M Manzi 143–57 London: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  46. 46.
    Hovorka AJ. 2017. Animal geographies I: Globalizing and decolonizing. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 41:382–94
     [Google Scholar]
  47. 47.
    Nightingale AJ. 2011. Bounding difference: intersectionality and the material production of gender, caste, class and environment in Nepal. Geoforum 42:153–62
     [Google Scholar]
  48. 48.
    Sultana F. 2014. Gendering climate change: geographical insights. Prof. Geogr. 66:3372–81
     [Google Scholar]
  49. 49.
    Harris L. 2015. Foreword: A quarter century of knowledge and change: pushing feminism, politics, and ecology in new directions with feminist political ecology. A Political Ecology of Women, Water and Global Environmental Change S Buechler, AM Hanson xix–xxiii London: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  50. 50.
    Hawkins R, Ojeda D. 2011. A discussion. Environ. Plann. D. 29:237–53
     [Google Scholar]
  51. 51.
    Reo NJ, Ogden LA. 2018. Anishnaabe Aki: an indigenous perspective on the global threat of invasive species. Sustain. Sci. 13:1443–52
     [Google Scholar]
  52. 52.
    Asher K. 2009. Black and Green: Afro-Colombians, Development, and Nature in the Pacific Lowlands Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  53. 53.
    Álvarez SE, Friedman EJ, Beckman E, Blackwell M, Stoltz Chinchilla N et al. 2003. Encountering Latin American and Caribbean feminisms. Signs: J. Women Culture Soc. 28:2537–79
     [Google Scholar]
  54. 54.
    Acosta A. 2015. Después del saqueo: Caminos hacia el posextractivismo. Perspect. Anál. Coment. Polít. Am. Lat. 1:12–15
     [Google Scholar]
  55. 55.
    Vélez Torres I. 2014. Dimensiones del extractivismo minero en Colombia. Análisis de las racionalidades del gobierno durante la última década. Anál. Polít. 27:8245–57
     [Google Scholar]
  56. 56.
    Veltmeyer H, Bowles P. 2014. Extractivist resistance: the case of the Enbridge oil pipeline project in Northern British Columbia. Extr. Ind. Soc. 1:159–68
     [Google Scholar]
  57. 57.
    Gómez-Barris M. 2017. The Extractive Zone: Social Ecologies and Decolonial Perspectives Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  58. 58.
    Rivera Cusicanqui S. 2010. Violencias (re)encubiertas en Bolivia La Paz, Boliv.: Ed. Piedra Rota
     [Google Scholar]
  59. 59.
    Smith A. 2005. Conquest: Sexual Violence and American Indian Genocide Boston: South End Press
     [Google Scholar]
  60. 60.
    Richie H, Roser M, Rosada P. 2021. Energy Rep. Our World in Data https://ourworldindata.org/energy
    [Google Scholar]
  61. 61.
    Richie H, Roser M. 2021. Palm oil Rep. Our World in Data. https://ourworldindata.org/palm-oil
    [Google Scholar]
  62. 62.
    Di Chiro G. 2008. Living environmentalisms: coalition politics, social reproduction, and environmental justice. Environ. . Politics 17:2276–98
     [Google Scholar]
  63. 63.
    Ye J, van der Ploeg J, Schneider S, Shanin T. 2020. The incursions of extractivism: moving from dispersed places to global capitalism. J. Peasant Stud. 47:1155–83
     [Google Scholar]
  64. 64.
    Svampa M. 2013. Consenso de los commodities y lenguajes de valoración en América Latina. Nueva Sociedad 244:430–46
     [Google Scholar]
  65. 65.
    Ayala Carrillo MR, Zapata Martelo E, Cortés Cortés R. 2017. Extractivismo: expresión del sistema capitalista-colonial-patriarcal. Ecol. Polít. 54:62–66
     [Google Scholar]
  66. 66.
    Petras J, Veltmeyer H. 2014. The New Extractivism: A Post-Neoliberal Development Model or Imperialism of the 21st Century? London: Zed Books
     [Google Scholar]
  67. 67.
    Borras J, Franco J. 2012. Global land grabbing and trajectories of agrarian change: a preliminary analysis. J. Agrar. Change 12:134–59
     [Google Scholar]
  68. 68.
    Harcourt W. 2017. Gender and sustainable livelihoods: linking gendered experiences of environment, community and self. Agric. Hum. Values 34:1007–19
     [Google Scholar]
  69. 69.
    Rocheleau D, Nirmal P 2015. Feminist political ecologies: grounded, networked and rooted on Earth. The Oxford Handbook of Transnational Feminist Movements B Rawwida, W Harcourt 793–814 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  70. 70.
    Berman Arévalo E, Ojeda D. 2020. Ordinary geographies: care, violence and agrarian extractivism in “post-conflict” “Colombia. ”. Antipode 52:61583–1602
     [Google Scholar]
  71. 71.
    Fernandez B. 2018. Dispossession and the depletion of social reproduction. Antipode 50:1142–63
     [Google Scholar]
  72. 72.
    Ulloa A. 2016. Feminismos territoriales en América latina: defensas de la vida frente a los extractivismos. Nómadas 45:123–39
     [Google Scholar]
  73. 73.
    Pratt ML. 1992. Imperial Eyes: Travel Writing and Transculturation London: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  74. 74.
    Dunbar-Ortiz R. 2014. An Indigenous People's History of the United States Boston: Beacon Press
     [Google Scholar]
  75. 75.
    Hannah-Jones N, Elliott M, Hughes J, Silverstein J. 2019. The 1619 Project. New York Times Magazine August 18
    [Google Scholar]
  76. 76.
    Riofrancos T. 2017. Extractivismo unearthed: a genealogy of a radical discourse. Cult. Stud. 31:2–3277–306
     [Google Scholar]
  77. 77.
    Giacomini T, Turner T, Isla A, Brownhill L. 2018. Ecofeminism against capitalism and for the commons. Capital. Nat. Social. 29:11–6
     [Google Scholar]
  78. 78.
    FAU (Fondo de Acción Urgente) 2021. Extractivismos, pandemia y otros mundos posibles Rep. FAU Bogota, Colomb:.
     [Google Scholar]
  79. 79.
    Timm Hidalgo AK. 2018. Feminicidio extractivista. Reflexiones sobre la violencia hacia las mujeres defensoras del agua y los territorios. Mujeres en defensa de territorios. Reflexiones feministas frente al extractivismo A Erpel Jara. 91–100 Santiago, Chile: Fund. Heinrich Böll
     [Google Scholar]
  80. 80.
    Ojeda D. 2021. Social reproduction, dispossession and the gendered workings of agrarian extractivism in Colombia. Agrarian Extractivism in Latin America BM McKay, A Alonso-Fradejas, A Ezquerro-Cañete 85–98 London: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  81. 81.
    Erpel Jara A 2018. Mujeres en defensa de territorios. Reflexiones feministas frente al extractivismo Santiago, Chile: Fund. Heinrich Böll
     [Google Scholar]
  82. 82.
    Leguizamón A. 2019. The gendered dimensions of resource extractivism in Argentina's soy boom. Latin Am. Perspect. 46:2199–216
     [Google Scholar]
  83. 83.
    León Araya A. 2017. Domesticando el despojo: palma africana, acaparamiento de tierras y género en el Bajo Aguán, Honduras. Rev. Colomb. Antropol. 53:1151–85
     [Google Scholar]
  84. 84.
    Silva Santisteban R. 2017. Mujeres y conflictos ecoterritoriales: impactos, estrategias, resistencias Rep. Entrepueblos, Asoc. Investig. Espec. Temas Iberoam., Demus. Estud. Def. Derechos Mujer, CMP Flora Tristán, Coord. Nac. Derechos Hum. Lima, Peru:
     [Google Scholar]
  85. 85.
    Singh J. 2018. Unthinking Mastery: Dehumanism and Decolonial Entanglements Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  86. 86.
    Trevilla Espinal DL, Soto Pinto ML, Morales H, Estrada-Lugo EIJ 2021. Feminist agroecology: analyzing power relationships in food systems. Agroecol. Sustain. Food Syst. 45:71029–49
     [Google Scholar]
  87. 87.
    Cabnal L. 2018. Acercamiento a la construcción de la propuesta de pensamiento epistémico de las mujeres indígenas feministas comunitarias de Abya Yala. Momento de paro, tiempo de rebelión. Miradas feministas para reinterpretar la lucha11–25 Lima, Peru: Minervas Ed.
     [Google Scholar]
  88. 88.
    Cruz Hernández DT. 2019. Mujeres, cuerpo y territorios: entre la defensa y la desposesión. Cuerpos, Territorios y Feminismos DT Cruz Hernández, M Bayón Jiménez 45–62 Mexico City: Inst. Estud. Ecol. Tercer Mundo, Ed. Abya-Yala, Bajo Tierra Ed., Lib. Bajo Palabra
    [Google Scholar]
  89. 89.
    Guzmán A. 2019. Descolonizar la memoria. Descolonizar los feminismos La Paz, Bol.: Tarpuna Muya
     [Google Scholar]
  90. 90.
    Penniman L. 2018. Farming While Black: Soul Fire Farm's Practical Guide To Liberation on The Land Hartford, VT: Chelsea Green Publ.
     [Google Scholar]
  91. 91.
    Davis J, Moulton A, Van Sant L, Williams B 2019. Anthropocene, Capitalocene, … Plantationocene?: A Manifesto for Ecological Justice in an Age of Global Crises. Geography Compass 13:5e12438
     [Google Scholar]
  92. 92.
    Haraway DJ. 2008. When Species Meet Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  93. 93.
    Rose DB. 2011. Wild Dog Dreaming: Love and Extinction Charlottesville: Univ. Va. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  94. 94.
    Bar-On YM, Phillips R, Milo R 2018. The biomass distribution on earth. PNAS 115:256506–11
     [Google Scholar]
  95. 95.
    Worm B, Barbier EB, Beaumont N, Duffy JE, Folke C et al. 2006. Impacts of biodiversity loss on ocean ecosystem services. Science 314:5800787–90
     [Google Scholar]
  96. 96.
    Shahbanden M. 2021. Meat industry value worldwide in 2020 and forecast for 2021 and 2025 (in billion U.S. dollars). Global Meat Products Market Value 2020–2025 Statista, July 26. https://www.statista.com/statistics/502286/global-meat-and-seafood-market-value/
    [Google Scholar]
  97. 97.
    The Pew Charitable Trusts 2021. Project: International Fisheries. The Pew Charitable Trusts https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/projects/international-fisheries
    [Google Scholar]
  98. 98.
    Steinfeld H, Gerber P, Wassenaar T, Castel V, Rosales M, de Haan C. 2006. Livestock's Long Shadow: Environmental Issues and Options Rome: UN Food Agric. Organ.
     [Google Scholar]
  99. 99.
    Emel J, Neo H, eds. 2015. Political Ecologies of Meat London: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  100. 100.
    FAO (UN Food Agric. Organ.) 2019. Meat and meat products. Animal Production and Health (NSA) FAO https://www.fao.org/ag/againfo/themes/en/meat/home.html
    [Google Scholar]
  101. 101.
    Weis T. 2013. The Ecological Hoofprint: The Global Burden of Industrial Livestock London: Zed Books
     [Google Scholar]
  102. 102.
    Collard RC, Dempsey J, Holmberg M. 2020. Extirpation despite regulation? Environmental assessment and caribou. Conserv. Sci. Pract 2:4e166
     [Google Scholar]
  103. 103.
    Watts V. 2013. Indigenous place-thought & agency amongst humans and non-humans (First Woman and Sky Woman go on a European world tour!). Decolon.: Indig. Educ. Soc. 2:120–34
     [Google Scholar]
  104. 104.
    Davis H, Todd Z. 2017. On the importance of a date, or, decolonizing the Anthropocene. ACME 16:4761–80
     [Google Scholar]
  105. 105.
    Emel J. 1998. Are you man enough, big and bad enough? Wolf eradication in the US. Animal Geographies: Place, Politics, and Identity in the Nature-Culture Borderlands J Wolch, J Emel 91–118 London: Verso
     [Google Scholar]
  106. 106.
    Rosen T. 2020. The evolving war on illegal wildlife trade. Still only one Earth: lessons from 50 years of UN sustainable development policy Earth Negot. Bull. Brief 3, Int. Inst. Sustain. Dev., Oct. 6. https://www.iisd.org/system/files/2020-10/still-one-earth-wildlife-trade.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  107. 107.
    Collard RC. 2020. Animal Traffic: Lively Capital in the Global Exotic Pet Trade Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  108. 108.
    Dempsey J. 2016. Enterprising Nature: Economics, Markets and Finance in Global Biodiversity Politics Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell
     [Google Scholar]
  109. 109.
    Malm A, the Zetkin Collective. 2021. White Skin, Black Fuel: On the Danger of Fossil Fascism London: Verso
     [Google Scholar]
  110. 110.
    Deckha M. 2021. Animals as Legal Beings: Contesting Anthropocentric Legal Orders Toronto: Univ. Tor. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  111. 111.
    Haraway D. 2016. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  112. 112.
    Wadiwel D. 2018. Chicken harvesting machine: animal labor, resistance, and the time of production. S. Atl. Q. 117:3527–49
     [Google Scholar]
  113. 113.
    Gillespie K. 2018. Placing Angola: racialisation, anthropocentrism, and settler colonialism at the Louisiana State Penitentiary's Angola Rodeo. Antipode 50:31267–89
     [Google Scholar]
  114. 114.
    Ko A. 2019. Racism as Zoological Witchcraft: A Guide to Getting Out New York: Lantern Books
     [Google Scholar]
  115. 115.
    Pachirat T. 2011. Every Twelve Seconds: Industrialized Slaughter and the Politics of Sight New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  116. 116.
    Block K, Amundson S. 2021. USA: Infamous trophy hunt shows what happens when gray wolves are stripped of protections. World Animals Voice June 17. https://worldanimalsvoice.com/2021/06/17/usa-infamous-trophy-hunt-shows-what-happens-when-gray-wolves-are-stripped-of-protections/
    [Google Scholar]
  117. 117.
    Macktima M. 2017. Examining historical issues pertaining to San Carlos Apache tribal identities through peoplehood Master's Thesis Univ. Okla., Norman
     [Google Scholar]
  118. 118.
    Pérez Orozco A. 2011. Crisis multidimensional y sostenibilidad de la vida. Investig. Fem. 2:29–53
     [Google Scholar]
  119. 119.
    Cabnal L. 2015. Sin ser consultadas: La mercantilización de nuestro territorio cuerpo-tierra. Mujeres defendiendo el territorio. Experiencias de participación en América Latina41–55 Bogota, Colomb.: Fondo Acción Urgent.
     [Google Scholar]
  120. 120.
    Aguilar RG, Linsalata L, Trujillo MLN. 2017. Producing the common and reproducing life: Keys towards rethinking the political. Social Sciences for an Other Politics: Women Theorizing Without Parachutes AC Dinerstein 79–92 Cham, Switz.: Springer
     [Google Scholar]
  121. 121.
    León Araya A. 2022. The fruits of labor or the fruits of nature? Towards a political ecology of labor in Central America. Routledge Handbook of Latin America and the Environment B Bustos, S Engel di Mauro, G García, F Milanez D Ojeda. London: Routledge. In press
     [Google Scholar]
  122. 122.
    Collard RC, Dempsey J. 2017. Capitalist natures in five orientations. Capital. Nat. Social. 28:178–97
     [Google Scholar]
  123. 123.
    Bell SE. 2016. Fighting King Coal: The Challenges to Micromobilization in Central Appalachia Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
     [Google Scholar]
  124. 124.
    Belcourt B-R. 2015. Animal bodies, colonial subjects: (re)locating animality in decolonial thought. Societies 5:1–11
     [Google Scholar]
  125. 125.
    Rocheleau D, Roth R. 2007. Rooted networks, relational webs and powers of connection: rethinking human and political ecologies. Geoforum 38:3433–37
     [Google Scholar]
  126. 126.
    Escobar A. 2008. Territories of Difference: Place, Movements, Life, Redes Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  127. 127.
    Picq M. 2014. Self-determination as anti-extractivism: how indigenous resistance challenges world politics. Restoring Indigenous Self-Determination: Theoretical and Practical Approaches M Woons 26–33 Bristol, UK: E-Int. Relat.
     [Google Scholar]
  128. 128.
    Sack R. 1983. Human Territoriality: A Theory Hoboken, NJ: Wiley
     [Google Scholar]
  129. 129.
    Harding S. 1986. The Science Question in Feminism Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  130. 130.
    Lorde A. 1982. Learning from the 60s Paper presented at Malcolm X Weekend at Harvard University Cambridge, MA, Febr: https://www.blackpast.org/african-american-history/1982-audre-lorde-learning-60s/
    [Google Scholar]
  131. 131.
    Grossman Z. 2017. Unlikely Alliances: Native Nations And White Communities Join To Defend Rural Lands Seattle: Univ. Wash. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  132. 132.
    Tsing A. 2015. The Mushroom at the End of the World Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  133. 133.
    LaDuke W. 1999. All Our Relations: Native Struggles for Land and Life Boston: South End Press
     [Google Scholar]
  134. 134.
    Alfred T. 2005. Wasáse: Indigenous Pathways of Action and Freedom Toronto: Univ. Tor. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  135. 135.
    Haraway DJ. 1989. Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science London: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  136. 136.
    Celemajer D, Scholsberg D, Rickards L, Stewart-Harawara M, Thaler M et al. 2021. Multispecies justice: theories, challenges, and a research agenda for environmental politics. Environ. . Politics 30:1–2119–40
     [Google Scholar]
  137. 137.
    Fernando JL. 2020. From the Virocene to the Lovecene epoch: multispecies justice as critical praxis for Virocene disruptions and vulnerabilities. J. Pol. Ecol. 27:1685–90
     [Google Scholar]
  138. 138.
    Tschakert P, Schlosberg D, Celemajer D, Rickards L, Winter C et al. 2020. Multispecies justice: climate-just futures with, for and beyond humans. WIREs Clim Change 12:2e699
     [Google Scholar]
  139. 139.
    Arcari P, Robyn-Rapsey F, Singer H 2021. Where species don't meet: invisibilized animals, urban nature and city limits. Environ. Plann. E. 4:3940–65
     [Google Scholar]
  140. 140.
    Srinivasan K. 2017. Conservation biopolitics and the sustainability episteme. Environ. Plan. A. 49:71458–76
     [Google Scholar]
  141. 141.
    Srinivasan K. 2013. The biopolitics of animal being and welfare: dog control and care in the UK and India. Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr. 38:1106–19
     [Google Scholar]
  142. 142.
    Jackson ZI. 2020. Becoming Human: Matter and Meaning in an Antiblack World New York: New York Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  143. 143.
    Wynter S. 1997.. ‘ Genital mutilation’ or ‘symbolic birth?’ Female circumcision, lost origins, and the aculturalism of feminist/Western thought. Case West. . Reserve Law Rev 47:2501–52
     [Google Scholar]
  144. 144.
    Schiebinger L. 1993. Nature's Body: Gender in the Making of Modern Science Boston: Beacon Press
     [Google Scholar]
  145. 145.
    Hovorka A. 2015. Feminism and animals: exploring interspecies relations through intersectionality, performativity and standpoint. Gender, Place Cult 22:11–19
     [Google Scholar]
  146. 146.
    Kim CJ. 2015. Dangerous Crossings: Race, Species, and Nature in a Multicultural Age New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  147. 147.
    Potter E, Miller F, Lovbrand E, Houston D, McLean J et al. 2020. A manifesto for shadow places: re-imagining and co-producing connections for justice in an era of climate change. Environ. Plann. E. 5:1272–92
     [Google Scholar]
  148. 148.
    Gillespie K, Narayanan Y. 2020. Animal nationalisms: multispecies cultural politics, race, and the (un)making of the settler nation-state. J. Intercult. Stud. 41:11–7
     [Google Scholar]
  149. 149.
    Gumbs AP. 2020. Undrowned: Black Feminist Lessons from Marine Mammals Oakland, CA: AK Press
     [Google Scholar]
  150. 150.
    Tran D. 2021. A comparative study of women environmental defenders’ antiviolent success strategies.. Geoforum 126:126–38
     [Google Scholar]
  151. 151.
    Johnson AE, Wilkinson KK, eds. 2021. All We Can Save: Truth, Courage, and Solutions for the Climate Crisis New York: One World
     [Google Scholar]
  152. 152.
    Hernández KJ, Rubis JM, Theriault N, Todd Z, Mitchell A et al. 2021. The Creatures Collective: manifestings. Environ. Plann. E. 4:3838–63
     [Google Scholar]
  153. 153.
    The Red Nation 2021. The Red Deal: Indigenous Action to Save Our Earth New York: Commons Notions
     [Google Scholar]
  154. 154.
    Wadiwel D. 2020. Foreword: Thinking “critically” about animals after colonialism. Colonialism and Animality: Anti-Colonial Perspectives in Critical Animal Studies K Struthers Montford, C Taylor, xvii–xxiv London: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-112320-092246
Loading

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error