1932

Abstract

We call for a further appreciation of the versatility of concepts and methods that increase the breadth and diversity of work on law and social science. We make our point with a review of legal cynicism. Legal cynicism's value, like other important concepts, lies in its versatility as well as its capacity for replication. Several classic works introduced legal cynicism, but Sampson & Bartusch named it. Kirk & Papachristos used a cultural framework to broaden it and added essential measures of perceived unresponsiveness and incapacity of police to ensure neighborhood safety and security. A structural theory of legal cynicism explains minority residents’ skepticism of, and desperate reliance on, police in the absence of alternative sources of safety. Historical and ethnographic studies play especially important roles in broadening the versatility of legal cynicism for the study of crime and responses to it.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-031620-093358
2020-10-13
2024-10-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/lawsocsci/16/1/annurev-lawsocsci-031620-093358.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-031620-093358&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Adriaenssen A, Karstedt S, Paoli L, Visschers J 2019. Taking crime seriously: conservation values and legal cynicism as predictors of public perceptions of the seriousness of crime. Int. Crim. Justice Rev. 29:4317–34
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Balbus I. 1973. The Dialectics of Legal Repression New York: Russell Sage
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Beckett K, Western B. 2001. Governing social marginality welfare, incarceration, and the transformation of state policy. Punishm. Soc. 3:143–59
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bell MC. 2016. Situational trust: how disadvantaged mothers reconceive legal cynicism. Law Soc. Rev. 50:2314–47
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bell MC. 2017. Police reform and the dismantling of legal estrangement. Yale Law J 126:82054–150
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Belluck P. 1998. End of a ghetto; special report; razing the slums to rescue the residents. New York TimesSept. 6 https://www.nytimes.com/1998/09/06/us/end-of-a-ghetto-a-special-report-razing-the-slums-to-rescue-the-residents.html
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Berg MT, Stewart EA, Intravia J, Warren PY, Simons RL 2016. Cynical streets: neighborhood social processes and perceptions of criminal injustice. Criminology 54:3520–47
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Black D. 1983. Crime as social control. Am. Sociol. Rev. 48:134–45
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Block CR, Block RL. 2005. Homicides in Chicago, 1965–1995 Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-Univ. Consort. Political Soc. Res https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06399.v5
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bobo LD, Thompson V. 2006. Unfair by design: the war on drugs, race, and the legitimacy of the criminal justice system. Soc. Res. 73:2445–72
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bocian D, Li W, Ernst KS 2008. Foreclosures by race and ethnicity: the demographics of a crisis Res. Rep., Cent. Responsible Lend Durham, NC: http://www.responsiblelending.org/mortgage-lending/research-analysis/foreclosures-by-race-and-ethnicity.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Boutros M. 2018. A multidimensional view of legal cynicism: perceptions of the police among anti-harassment teams in Egypt. Law Soc. Rev. 52:2368–400
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Breen R, Karlson KB, Holm A 2018. Interpreting and understanding logits, probits, and other nonlinear probability models. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 44:39–54
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Brunson RK, Wade BA. 2019. “Oh hell no, we don't talk to police”: insights on the lack of cooperation in police investigations of urban gun violence. Criminol. Public Policy 18:3623–48
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Carr PJ, Napolitano L, Keating J 2007. We never call the cops and here is why: a qualitative examination of legal cynicism in three Philadelphia neighborhoods. Criminology 45:2445–80
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Clogg CC, Petkova E, Haritou A 1995. Statistical methods for comparing regression coefficients between models. Am. J. Sociol. 100:51261–93
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Cohen A, Taylor E. 2000. American Pharaoh: Mayor Richard J. Daley—His Battle for Chicago and the Nation New York: Little, Brown, & Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Conroy J. 2000. Unspeakable Acts, Ordinary People: The Dynamics of Torture Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Corsaro N, Frank J, Ozer M 2015. Perceptions of police practice, cynicism of police performance, and persistent neighborhood violence: an intersecting relationship. J. Crim. Justice 43:11–11
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Currie S. 1988. Rainbow's End: Irish Americans and the Dilemmas of Urban Machine Politics, 1840–1985 Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Desmond M, Valdez N. 2013. Unpolicing the urban poor: consequences of third-party policing for inner-city women. Am. Sociol. Rev. 78:1117–41
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Elder G Jr 1994. Time, human agency, and social change: perspectives on the life course. Soc. Psychol. Q. 57:14–15
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Emery CR, Jolley JM, Wu S 2011. Desistance from intimate partner violence: the role of legal cynicism, collective efficacy, and social disorganization in Chicago neighborhoods. Am. J. Community Psychol. 48:3–4373–83
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Fagan J, Piquero AR. 2007. Rational choice and developmental influences on recidivism among adolescent felony offenders. J. Empir. Leg. Stud. 4:4715–48
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Fagan J, Tyler TR. 2005. Legal socialization of children and adolescents. Soc. Justice Res. 18:3217–42
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Fagan A, Wright EM, Pinchevsky GM 2015. A multi-level analysis of the impact of neighborhood structural and social factors on adolescent substance use. Drug Alcohol Depend 153:1180–86
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Fine A, Cauffman E. 2015. Race and justice system attitude formation during the transition to adulthood. J. Dev. Life-Course Criminol. 1:4325–49
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Geller A, Fagan J. 2019. Police contact and the legal socialization of urban teens. RSF 5:126–49
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Gifford F, Reisig MD. 2019. A multidimensional model of legal cynicism. Law Hum. Behav. 43:4386–96
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Hagan J. 2010. Who Are the Criminals? The Politics of Crime Policy in the Age of Roosevelt to the Age of Reagan Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Hagan J, Kaiser J, Hanson A 2015. Iraq and the Crimes of Aggressive War: The Legal Cynicism of Criminal Militarism New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Hagan J, Kaiser J, Hanson A 2016. The theory of legal cynicism and the Sunni insurgency in post-invasion Iraq. Am. Sociol. Rev. 81:2316–46
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Hagan J, McCarthy B, Herda D 2018a. Race, legal cynicism, and the machine politics of drug law enforcement in Chicago. Du Bois Rev 15:1129–51
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Hagan J, McCarthy B, Herda D, Chandrasekher AC 2018b. Dual process theory of racial isolation, legal cynicism, and reported crime. PNAS 115:287190–99
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Hall M, Crowder K, Spring A 2015. Neighborhood foreclosures, racial/ethnic transitions, and residential segregation. Am. Sociol. Rev. 80:3526–49
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Harding DJ, Hepburn P. 2014. Cultural mechanisms in neighborhood effects research in the United States. Sociol. Urbana Rurale 103:37–73
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Hinton E. 2016. From the War on Poverty to the War on Crime: The Making of Mass Incarceration in America Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Hinton E, Kohler-Hausmann J, Weaver VM 2016. Did blacks really endorse the 1994 crime bill. New York Times Apr. 13. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/13/opinion/did-blacks-really-endorse-the-1994-crime-bill.html?mtrref=undefined&assetType=opinion&_r=0
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Hipp JR. 2007. Block, tract, and levels of aggregation: neighborhood structure and crime and disorder as a case in point. Am. Sociol. Rev. 72:5659–80
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Hitchens BK, Carr PJ, Clampet-Lundquist S 2018. The context for legal cynicism: urban young women's experiences with policing in low-income, high-crime neighborhoods. Race Justice 8:127–50
    [Google Scholar]
  41. House JS, Kaplan GA, Morenoff J, Raudenbush SW, Williams DR, Young EA 2012. Chicago Community Adult Health Study, 2001–2003 ICPSR31142-v1 Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-Univ. Consort. Political Soc. Res http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31142.v1
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  42. Ignatiev N. 1995. How the Irish Became White New York: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Johnson D, Maguire ER, Kuhns JB 2014. Public perceptions of the legitimacy of the law and legal authorities: evidence from the Caribbean. Law Soc. Rev. 48:4947–78
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Jones N. 2018. The Chosen Ones: Black Men and the Politics of Redemption Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Kaiser J, Hagan J. 2018. Crimes of terror, counterterrorism, and the unanticipated consequences of a militarized incapacitation strategy in Iraq. Social Forces 97:1309–46
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Kaiser K, Reisig MD. 2019. Legal socialization and self-reported criminal offending: the role of procedural justice and legal orientations. J. Quant. Criminol. 35:1135–54
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Karstedt S, Farrall S. 2006. The moral economy of everyday crime: markets, consumers and citizens. Br. J. Criminol. 46:61011–36
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Kennedy R. 1997. Race, Crime, and the Law New York: Pantheon
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Kerrison EM, Cobbina J, Bender K 2018. “Your pants won't save you”: why black youth challenge race-based police surveillance and the demands of black respectability politics. Race Justice 8:17–26
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Kirk DS. 2016. Prisoner reentry and the reproduction on legal cynicism. Soc. Probl. 63:2222–43
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Kirk DS, Matsuda M. 2011. Legal cynicism, collective efficacy, and the ecology of arrest. Criminology 49:2443–72
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Kirk DS, Papachristos AV. 2011. Cultural mechanisms and the persistence of neighborhood violence. Am. J. Sociol. 116:41190–233
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Kirk DS, Papachristos AV, Fagan J, Tyler TR 2012. The paradox of law enforcement in immigrant communities: Does tough immigration enforcement undermine public safety. Ann. Am. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 641:179–98
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Koeneman K. 2013. First Son: The Biography of Richard M. Daley Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Kohler U, Karlson KB, Holm A 2011. Comparing coefficients of nested nonlinear probability models. Stata J 11:3420–38
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Lee JM, Steinberg L, Piquero AR, Knight GP 2011. Identity-linked perceptions of the police among African American juvenile offenders: a developmental perspective. J. Youth Adolesc. 40:23–37
    [Google Scholar]
  57. MacCoun RJ. 2018. Enhancing research credibility when replication is not feasible. Behav. Brain Sci. 41:e142
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Massey D, Denton N. 1993. American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Matza D. 1964. Delinquency and Drift New Brunswick, NJ: Trans. Publ.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. McCarthy B, Hagan J, Herda D 2020. Neighborhood climates of legal cynicism and complaints about abuse of police power. Criminology 58:351036
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Moule RK Jr, Fox BH, Perry MM. 2019. The long shadow of Ferguson: legitimacy, legal cynicism, and public perceptions of police militarization. Crime Delinq 65:2151–82
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Muller C. 2012. Northward migration and the rise of racial disparity in American incarceration, 1880–1950. Am. J. Sociol. 118:2281–326
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Nivette AE, Eisner M, Malti T, Ribeaud D 2015. The social and developmental antecedents of legal cynicism. J. Res. Crime Delinq. 52:2270–98
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Nivette AE, Eisner M, Ribeaud D 2019. Evaluating the shared and unique predictors of legal cynicism and police legitimacy from adolescence into early adulthood. Criminology 58:70–100
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Piquero AR, Bersani BE, Loughran TA, Fagan J 2016. Longitudinal patterns of legal socialization in first-generation immigrants, second-generation immigrants, and native-born serious youthful offenders. Crime Delinq 62:111403–25
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Piquero AR, Fagan J, Mulvey EP, Steinberg L, Odgers C 2005. Developmental trajectories of legal socialization among serious adolescent offenders. J. Crim. Law Criminol. 96:1267–98
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Ralph L. 2013. The quality of pain: how police torture shapes historical consciousness. Anthropol. Theory 13:1/2104–18
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Reisig MD, Wolfe SE, Holtfreter J 2011. Legal cynicism, legitimacy, and criminal offending: the nonconfounding effect of low self-control. Crim. Justice Behav. 38:121265–79
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Rothstein R. 2017. The Color of Law: A Forgotten History of How Our Government Segregated America London: W.W. Norton
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Sampson RJ. 2008. Moving to inequality: neighborhood effects and experiments meet social structure. Am. J. Sociol. 114:1189–231
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Sampson RJ. 2012. Great American City: Chicago and the Enduring Neighborhood Effect Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Sampson RJ, Bartusch DJ. 1998. Legal cynicism and (subcultural?) tolerance of deviance: the neighborhood context of racial differences. Law Soc. Rev. 32:4777–804
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Sampson RJ, Raudenbush S, Earls F 1997. Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multi-level study of collective efficacy. Science 277:918–24
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Shaw CR, McKay HD. 1942. Juvenile Delinquency and Urban Areas: A Study of Rates of Delinquency in Relation to Differential Characteristics of Local Communities in American Cities Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Small ML. 2018. Understanding when people will report crimes to the police. PNAS 15:328057–59
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Soller B, Jackson AL, Browning CR 2014. Legal cynicism and parental appraisals of adolescent violence. Br. J. Criminol. 54:4568–91
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Srole L. 1956. Social integration and certain corollaries: an exploratory study. Am. Sociol. Rev. 21:6709–16
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Taylor GF. 2014. The Chicago police torture scandal: a legal and political history. CUNY Law Rev 17:329–81
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Taylor GF. 2019. The Torture Machine: Racism and Police Violence in Chicago New York: Haymarket Books
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Tuttle W. 1970. Race Riot: Chicago in the Red Summer of 1919 New York: Atheneum
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Vaisey S. 2009. Motivation and justification: a dual‐process model of culture in action. Am. J. Sociol. 114:61675–715
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Vaisey S. 2010. What people want: rethinking poverty, culture, and educational attainment. Ann. Am. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 629:75–101
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Van Damme A, Pauwels V 2016. Why are young adults willing to cooperate with the police and comply with traffic laws? Examining the role of attitudes toward the police and law, perceived deterrence and personal morality. Int. J. Law Crime Justice 46:103–16
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Ward G. 2016. Microclimates of racial meaning: historical racial violence and environmental impacts. Wis. Law Rev. 2016:3575–626
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Western B. 2006. Punishment and Inequality in America New York: Russell Sage Found.
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Wilson WJ. 1987. The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-031620-093358
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-031620-093358
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error