1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Law and Social Science
  4. Volume 13, 2017
  5. Article

Annual Review of Law and Social Science

Volume 13, 2017

Procedural Justice and Policing: A Rush to Judgment?

Abstract

Within policing research there is currently little research examining the role of procedural justice in shaping legitimacy and considering their joint role in shaping compliance. However, large literatures in social psychology and management make a plausible case for the value of applying this model to policing. These literatures suggest that it is likely that () the practices of the police can be crafted to raise perceptions of procedural justice, () police training can alter officer behavior, and () redesigning police organizations internally can motivate their members to treat community members more fairly. A focus on legitimacy highlights the virtues of consensual models of policing. Consensual models are found to motivate public cooperation in fighting crime and to heighten identification with and engagement in communities. Consequently, legitimacy is the most promising framework for discussing changing the goals of policing and moving from a police force model to a police service model.

Keyword(s): coercion, compliance, consensual models of authority, cooperation, engagement, identification, legitimacy, procedural justice, trust in the police
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110316-113318
2017-10-13
2025-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/lawsocsci/13/1/annurev-lawsocsci-110316-113318.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110316-113318&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abuwala R, Farole DJ. 2008. The Effects of the Harlem Housing Court on Tenant Perceptions of Justice. New York: Cent. Court Innov.
  2. Augustyn MB. 2015a. The (ir)relevance of procedural justice in the pathways to crime. Law Hum. Behav. 39:388–401 [Google Scholar]
  3. Augustyn MB. 2015b. Updating perceptions of (in)justice. J. Res. Crime Delinq. 53:2255–86 [Google Scholar]
  4. Baker T. 2016. Exploring the relationship of shared race/ethnicity with court actors, perceptions of court procedural justice, and obligation to obey among male offenders. Justice 7:87–102 [Google Scholar]
  5. Beijersbergen KA, Dirkzwager AJE, Eichelsheim VI, Van Der Laan PH, Nieuwbeerta P. 2015. Procedural justice, anger, and prisoners' misconduct: a longitudinal study. Crim. Justice Behav. 42:196–218 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bennett S, Mazerolle L. 2010. Testing Police Legitimacy…One Breath at a Time: The Queensland Community Engagement Trial: Methodology and Materials St. Lucia, Aust.: Univ. Queensland [Google Scholar]
  7. Bond CEW, Gow DJ. 1996. Policing the beat: the experience in Toowoomba, Queensland. Crime Prev. Stud. 6:153–73 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bottoms A, Tankebe J. 2012. Beyond procedural justice: a dialogic approach to legitimacy in criminal justice. J. Crim. Law Criminol. 102:119–70 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bradford B, Quinton P. 2014. Self-legitimacy, police culture and support for democratic policing in an English constabulary. Br. J. Criminol. 54:1023–46 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bradford B, Quinton P, Myhill A, Porter G. 2014. Why do ‘the law’ comply? Procedural justice, group identification and officer motivations in police organizations. Eur. J. Criminol. 11:1110–31 [Google Scholar]
  11. Canada KE, Hiday VA. 2014. Procedural justice in mental health court: an investigation of the relation of perception of procedural justice to non-adherence and termination. J. Forensic Psychiatry Psychol. 25:3321–40 [Google Scholar]
  12. Chang CS. 2015. Relationships of organizational justice and organizational constraints with performance: a meta-analysis PhD Thesis, Bowling Green State Univ., Bowling Green, OH [Google Scholar]
  13. Cohen-Charash Y, Spector PE. 2001. The role of justice in organizations: a meta-analysis. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 86:278–321 [Google Scholar]
  14. Cole ND, Latham GP. 1997. Effects of training in procedural justice on perceptions of disciplinary fairness by unionized employees and disciplinary subject matter experts. J. Appl. Psychol. 82:699–705 [Google Scholar]
  15. Colquitt JA, Conlon DE, Wesson MJ, Porter COLH, Ng KY. 2001. Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. J. Appl. Psychol. 86:425–45 [Google Scholar]
  16. Colquitt JA, Scott BA, Rodell JB, Long DM, Zapata CP. et al. 2013. Justice at the millennium, a decade later: a meta-analytic test of social exchange and affect-based perspectives. J. Appl. Psychol. 98:2199–236 [Google Scholar]
  17. Dai M, Frank J, Sun I. 2011. Procedural justice during police-citizen encounters. J. Crim. Justice 39:2159–68 [Google Scholar]
  18. Damaska M. 1975. Presentation of evidence and fact finding precision. Univ. Pa. Law Rev. 123:51083–106 [Google Scholar]
  19. De Angelis J, Kupchik A. 2007. Citizen oversight, procedural justice, and officer perceptions of the complaint investigation process. Policing 30:651–71 [Google Scholar]
  20. De Angelis J, Kupchik A. 2009. Ethnicity, trust, and acceptance of authority among police officers. J. Crim. Justice 37:273–79 [Google Scholar]
  21. DeCremer D, Tyler TR. 2005. Managing group behavior: the interplay between procedural justice, sense of self, and cooperation. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 37:151–218 [Google Scholar]
  22. Dillon P, Emery R. 1996. Divorce mediation and resolution of child custody disputes: long-term effects. Am. J. Orthopsychiatry 66:131–40 [Google Scholar]
  23. Donner C, Maskaly J, Fridell L, Jennings WG. 2015. Policing and procedural justice: a state-of-the-art review. Policing 38:153–72 [Google Scholar]
  24. Dunford B, Devine D. 1998. Employment at-will and employee discharge: a justice perspective on legal action following termination. Pers. Psychol. 51:4903–34 [Google Scholar]
  25. Earley PC, Lind EA. 1987. Procedural justice and participation in task selection. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 52:1148–60 [Google Scholar]
  26. Eisner MP, Nivette A. 2014. Does low legitimacy cause crime? A review of the evidence. Legitimacy and Criminal Justice J Tankebe, A Liebling 308–25 Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  27. Epp CR, Maynard-Moody S, Haider-Markel DP. 2014. Pulled Over: How Police Stops Define Race and Citizenship Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  28. Fagan J, Tyler T. 2005. Legal socialization of children and adolescents. Soc. Justice Res. 18:3217–41 [Google Scholar]
  29. Farmer SJ, Beehr TA, Love KG. 2003. Becoming an undercover police officer. J. Organ. Behav. 24:373–87 [Google Scholar]
  30. Farole DJ. 2007. Public Perceptions of New York's Courts: The New York State Residents Survey New York: Cent. Court Innov. [Google Scholar]
  31. Geller A, Fagan J, Tyler TR, Link BG. 2014. Aggressive policing and the mental health of young urban men. Am. J. Public Health 104:2321–27 [Google Scholar]
  32. Goff PA, Epstein LM, Reddy KS. 2013. Crossing the line of legitimacy: the impact of cross-deputization policy on crime reporting. Psychol. Public Policy Law 19:250–58 [Google Scholar]
  33. Gottfredson DC, Kearley BW, Najaka SS, Rocha CM. 2007. How drug treatment courts work. J. Res. Crime Delinq. 44:3–35 [Google Scholar]
  34. Gould JB, Mastrofski SD. 2004. Suspect searches: assessing police behavior under the Constitution. Criminol. Public Policy 3:316–62 [Google Scholar]
  35. Green DP, Thorley DR. 2014. Field experimentation and the study of law and policy. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 10:53–72 [Google Scholar]
  36. Greenberg J. 1990. Employee theft as a reaction to underpayment inequity: the hidden cost of pay cuts. J. Appl. Psychol. 75:5561–68 [Google Scholar]
  37. Greenberg J. 1994. Using socially fair treatment to promote acceptance of a work site smoking ban. J. Appl. Psychol. 79:2288–97 [Google Scholar]
  38. Greene C, Sprott J, Madon N, Jung M. 2010. Punishing processes in youth court: procedural justice, court atmosphere and youths' views of the legitimacy of the justice system. Can. J. Criminol. Crim. Justice 52:527–44 [Google Scholar]
  39. Greiner DJ, Matthews A. 2016. Randomized control trials in the United States legal profession. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 12:295–312 [Google Scholar]
  40. Harris CJ, Worden RE. 2014. The effects of sanctions on police misconduct. Crime Delinq 60:1258–88 [Google Scholar]
  41. Hayden R, Anderson J. 1979. On the evaluation of procedural systems in laboratory experiments. Law Hum. Behav. 3:1/221–38 [Google Scholar]
  42. Higginson A, Mazerolle L. 2014. Legitimacy policing of places. J. Exp. Criminol. 10:429–57 [Google Scholar]
  43. Hinds L. 2007. Building police-youth relationships: the importance of procedural justice. Natl. Assoc. Youth Justice 7:195–209 [Google Scholar]
  44. Hinds L. 2009. Youth, police legitimacy and informal contact. J. Police Crim. Psychol. 24:10–21 [Google Scholar]
  45. Hipple NK, Gruenewald J, McGarrell EF. 2014. Restorativeness, procedural justice, and defiance as predictors of reoffending of participants in family group conferences. Crime Delinq 60:81131–57 [Google Scholar]
  46. Hogg MA, Abrams D. 1988. Social Identifications Abingdon-on-Thames, UK: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  47. Hollander-Blumoff R. 2016. Formation of procedural justice judgments in legal negotiations. Group Decis. Negot. 26:19–43 [Google Scholar]
  48. Houlden P, LaTour S, Walker L, Thibaut J. 1978. Preference for modes of dispute resolution as a function of process and decision control. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 14:13–30 [Google Scholar]
  49. Huq A, Tyler TR, Schulhofer SJ. 2011. Mechanisms for eliciting cooperation in counterterrorism policing: evidence from the United Kingdom. J. Empir. Legal Stud. 8:728–61 [Google Scholar]
  50. Jackson J, Bradford B, Hough M, Myhill A, Quinton P, Tyler TR. 2012. Why do people comply with the law? Legitimacy and the influence of legal institutions. Br. J. Criminol. 52:61051–71 [Google Scholar]
  51. Jonathan-Zamir T, Mastrofski SD, Moyal S. 2015. Measuring procedural justice in police-citizen encounters. Justice Q 32:5845–71 [Google Scholar]
  52. Jonathan-Zamir T, Weisburd D. 2013. The effects of security threats on antecedents of police legitimacy: findings from a quasi-experiment in Israel. J. Res. Crime Delinq. 50:3–32 [Google Scholar]
  53. Jones JM. 2014. Urban blacks in U.S. have little confidence in police. Gallup Polls Dec. 8. http://www.gallup.com/poll/179909/urban-blacks-little-confidence-police.aspx [Google Scholar]
  54. Kaiser KA, Holtfreter K. 2015. An integrated theory of specialized court programs: using procedural justice and therapeutic jurisprudence to promote offender compliance and rehabilitation. Crim. Justice Behav. 43:45–62 [Google Scholar]
  55. Kane RJ. 2005. Compromised police legitimacy as a predictor of violent crime in structurally disadvantaged communities. Criminology 43:2469–98 [Google Scholar]
  56. Kim WC, Mauborgne RA. 1993. Procedural justice, attitudes, and subsidiary top management compliance with multinationals' corporate strategic decisions. Acad. Manag. 36:3502–26 [Google Scholar]
  57. Kirk DS, Papachristos AV. 2011. Cultural mechanisms and the persistence of neighborhood violence. Am. J. Sociol. 116:41190–233 [Google Scholar]
  58. Kitzmann K, Emery R. 1993. Procedural justice and parents' satisfaction in a field study of child custody dispute resolution. Law Hum. Behav. 17:553–67 [Google Scholar]
  59. Kochel TR. 2012. Can police legitimacy promote collective efficacy. Justice Q 29:384–419 [Google Scholar]
  60. Koivisto S, Lipponen J. 2015. A leader's procedural justice, respect and extra-role behavior: the roles of leader in-group prototypicality and identification. Soc. Justice Res. 28:2187–206 [Google Scholar]
  61. LaTour S. 1978. Determinations of participant and observer satisfaction with adversary and inquisitorial modes of adjudication. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 36:121531–45 [Google Scholar]
  62. Lee CG, Cheesman F, Rottman D, Swaner R, Lambson S. et al. 2014. A community court grows in Brooklyn: a comprehensive evaluation of the Red Hook Community Justice Center Final Rep., Natl. Cent. State Courts, Williamsburg, VA. http://www.courtinnovation.org/sites/default/files/documents/RH%20Evaluation%20Final%20Report.pdf [Google Scholar]
  63. Leventhal GS. 1980. What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. Social Exchange K Gergen, M Greenberg, R Willis 27–55 New York: Plenum [Google Scholar]
  64. Lind EA, Erickson BE, Friedland N, Dickenberger M. 1978. Reactions to procedural models for adjudicative conflict resolution: a cross-national study. J. Confl. Resolut. 2:318–41 [Google Scholar]
  65. Lind EA, Greenberg J, Scott K, Welchans TD. 2000. The winding road from employee to complainant: situational and psychological determinants of wrongful-termination claims. Adm. Sci. Q. 45:3557–90 [Google Scholar]
  66. Lind EA, Kulik CT, Ambrose M, de Vera Park M. 1993. Individual and corporate dispute resolution. Adm. Sci. Q. 38:224–51 [Google Scholar]
  67. Lind EA, Thibaut J, Walker L. 1973. Discovery and presentation of evidence in adversary and non-adversary proceedings. Mich. Law Rev. 71:1129–44 [Google Scholar]
  68. Lind EA, Tyler TR. 1988. The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice New York: Plenum [Google Scholar]
  69. Ma B, Liu S, Liu D. 2014. The impact of organizational identification on the relationship between procedural justice and employee work outcomes. Soc. Behav. Personal. 42:3437–44 [Google Scholar]
  70. MacCoun R. 2005. Voice, control, and belonging: the double-edged sword of procedural fairness. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 1:171–201 [Google Scholar]
  71. MacCoun RJ, Lind EA, Hensler DR, Bryant DL, Ebener PA. 1988. Alternative Adjudication. Santa Monica, CA: RAND
  72. MacQueen S, Bradford B. 2015. Enhancing public trust and police legitimacy during road traffic encounters: results from a randomised controlled trial in Scotland. J. Exp. Criminol. 11:419–43 [Google Scholar]
  73. Maguire ER, Lowrey BV, Johnson D. 2016. Evaluating the relative impact of positive and negative encounters with police: a randomized experiment. J. Exp. Criminol. In press [Google Scholar]
  74. Makkai T, Braithwaite J. 1996. Procedural justice and regulatory compliance. Law Hum. Behav. 20:183–98 [Google Scholar]
  75. Mastrofski S, Snipes B, Supina AE. 1996. Compliance on demand: the public's response to specific police requests. J. Res. Crime Delinq. 33:269–305 [Google Scholar]
  76. Mazerolle L, Antrobus E, Bennett S, Tyler TR. 2013a. Shaping citizen perceptions of police legitimacy: a randomized field trial of procedural justice. Criminology 51:33–64 [Google Scholar]
  77. Mazerolle L, Bennett S, Antrobus E, Eggins E. 2012. Procedural justice, routine encounters and citizen perceptions of police: main findings from the Queensland Community Engagement Trial (QCET). J. Exp. Criminol. 8:343–67 [Google Scholar]
  78. Mazerolle L, Bennett S, Davis J, Sargeant E, Dunning M. 2013b. Procedural justice and police legitimacy. J. Exp. Criminol. 9:245–74 [Google Scholar]
  79. Mazerolle L, Sargeant E, Cherney A, Bennett S, Murphy K. et al. 2014. Procedural Justice and Legitimacy in Policing New York: Springer [Google Scholar]
  80. McCluskey JD. 2003. Police Requests for Compliance El Paso, TX: LFB Sch. Publ. [Google Scholar]
  81. McCluskey JD, Mastrofski SD, Parks RB. 1999. To acquiesce or rebel: predicting citizen compliance with police requests. Police Q 2:389–416 [Google Scholar]
  82. McLean K, Wolfe SE. 2016. A sense of injustice loosens the moral bind of law: specifying the links between procedural justice, neutralizations, and offending. Crim. Justice Behav. 43:27–44 [Google Scholar]
  83. Meares TL, Tyler TR, Gardener J. 2016. Lawful or fair? How cops and laypeople perceive good policing. J. Criminol. Crim. Law 105:2297–344 [Google Scholar]
  84. Miller D. 2001. Disrespect and the experience of injustice. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 52:527–53 [Google Scholar]
  85. Murphy K. 2004. Procedural justice, shame and tax compliance. Work. Pap. 50, Cent. Tax Syst. Integr., Aust. Natl. Univ., Canberra, Aust.
  86. Murphy K. 2013. Does procedural justice matter to youth? Comparing adults' and youths' willingness to collaborate with police. Polic. Soc. 25:53–76 [Google Scholar]
  87. Murphy K, Bradford B, Jackson J. 2015. Motivating compliance behavior among offenders. Crim. Justice Behav. 43:102–18 [Google Scholar]
  88. Murphy K, Hinds L, Fleming J. 2008. Encouraging public cooperation and support for police. Polic. Soc. 18:136–55 [Google Scholar]
  89. Myhill A, Quinton P. 2011. It's a Fair Cop? Police Legitimacy, Public Cooperation and Crime Reduction. London: Natl. Polic. Improv. Agency
  90. Nagin DS, Telep CW. 2017. Procedural justice and legal compliance. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 13:5–28 [Google Scholar]
  91. Nakamura S, Somemura H, Sasaki N, Yamamoto M, Tanaka M, Tanaka K. 2016. Effect of management training in organizational justice: a randomized controlled trial. Ind. Health 54:3263–71 [Google Scholar]
  92. Nivette AE, Eisner M. 2013. Do legitimate polities have fewer homicides? A cross-national analysis. Homicide Stud 17:13–26 [Google Scholar]
  93. Owens E, Weisburd D, Alpert G, Amendola K. 2016. Promoting officer integrity through early engagements and procedural justice in the Seattle Police Department. Final Rep., Police Found., Washington, DC
  94. Papachristos AV, Meares TL, Fagan J. 2012. Why do criminals obey the law? The influence of legitimacy and social networks on active gun offenders. J. Crim. Law Criminol. 102:2397–440 [Google Scholar]
  95. Paternoster R, Brame R, Bachman R, Sherman LW. 1997. Do fair procedures matter. Law Soc. Rev. 31:163–204 [Google Scholar]
  96. Poythress N. 1994. Procedural preferences, perceptions of fairness, and compliance with outcomes: a study of alternatives to the standard adversary trial procedure. Law Hum. Behav. 18:4361–76 [Google Scholar]
  97. Reicher S, Stott C, Cronin P, Adang O. 2004. An integrated approach to crowd psychology and public order policing. Policing 27:4558–72 [Google Scholar]
  98. Reisig MD, Tankebe J, Meško G. 2012. Cooperation with the police among young Slovene adults. J. Crim. Justice Secur. 13:147–64 [Google Scholar]
  99. Reisig MD, Tankebe J, Meško G. 2014. Compliance with the law in Slovenia: the role of procedural justice and police legitimacy. Eur. J. Crim. Policy Res. 20:259–76 [Google Scholar]
  100. Richter M, König CJ, Koppermann C, Schilling M. 2016. Displaying fairness while delivering bad news: testing the effectiveness of organizational bad news training in the layoff context. J. Appl. Psychol. 101:6779–92 [Google Scholar]
  101. Robbins J, Ford MT, Tetrick LE. 2012. Perceived unfairness and employee health: a meta-analytic integration. J. Appl. Psychol. 97:2235–72 [Google Scholar]
  102. Sahin N, Braga A, Apel R, Brunson R. 2016. The impact of procedurally-just policing on citizen perceptions of police during traffic stops: the Adana Randomized Controlled Trial. J. Quant. Criminol. 2016:1–26 [Google Scholar]
  103. Schaefer B, Hughes T. 2016. Honing interpersonal necessary tactics (H.I.N.T.): an evaluation of procedural justice training. Rep., Louisville Metro Police Dep. Train. Div., Louisville, KY. https://louisville.edu/spi/news/LMPDHoningInterpersonalNecessaryTacticsTrainingEvaluation.pdf [Google Scholar]
  104. Schneider B. 2015. Do Americans trust their cops to be fair and just? New poll contains surprises. Reuters Jan. 15 [Google Scholar]
  105. Shute S, Hood R, Seemungal F. 2005. A fair hearing? Ethnic minorities in the criminal courts. Cullompton, UK: Willan
  106. Skarlicki D, Latham G. 1996. Increasing citizenship behavior within a labor union: a test of organizational justice theory. J. Appl. Psychol. 81:2161–69 [Google Scholar]
  107. Skarlicki D, Latham G. 1997. Leadership training in organizational justice to increase citizenship behavior within a labor union: a replication. Pers. Psychol. 50:3617–33 [Google Scholar]
  108. Stott C, Hoggett J, Pearson G. 2012. Keeping the peace: social identity, procedural justice and the policing of football crowds. Br. J. Criminol. 52:381–99 [Google Scholar]
  109. Sunshine J, Tyler TR. 2003. The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law Soc. Rev. 37:3513–48 [Google Scholar]
  110. Tankebe J, Reisig MD, Wang X. 2016. A multidimensional model of police legitimacy: a cross-cultural assessment. Law Hum. Behav. 40:11–22 [Google Scholar]
  111. Taxman FS, Gordon JA. 2009. Do fairness and equity matter? An examination of organizational justice among correctional officers in adult prisons. Crim. Justice Behav. 36:695–711 [Google Scholar]
  112. Thibaut J, Walker L. 1975. Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
  113. Thibaut J, Walker L, LaTour S, Houlden P. 1974. Procedural justice as fairness. Stanford Law Rev 26:1271–89 [Google Scholar]
  114. Thibaut J, Walker L, Lind EA. 1972. Adversary presentation and bias in legal decision making. Harvard Law Rev 86:386–401 [Google Scholar]
  115. Tremblay M, Cloutier J, Simard G, Chenevert D, Vandenberghe C. 2010. The role of HRM practices, procedural justice, organizational support and trust in organization commitment and in-role and extra-role performance. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 21:3405–33 [Google Scholar]
  116. Trinkner R, Cohn E, Rebellon C, Van Gundy K. 2012. Don't trust anyone over 30: parental legitimacy as a mediator between parenting style and changes in delinquent behavior over time. J. Adolesc. 35:119–32 [Google Scholar]
  117. Trinkner R, Tyler TR, Goff PA. 2016. Justice from within: the relations between a procedurally just organizational climate and police organizational efficiency, endorsement of democratic policing, and officer well-being. Psychol. Public Policy Law 22:158–72 [Google Scholar]
  118. Tyler TR. 1987. The psychology of dispute resolution: implications for the mediation of disputes by third parties. Negot. J. 3:367–74 [Google Scholar]
  119. Tyler TR. 1988. What is procedural justice? Criteria used by citizens to assess the fairness of legal procedures. Law Soc. Rev. 22:103–35 [Google Scholar]
  120. Tyler TR. 1989. The quality of dispute resolution processes and outcomes: measurement problems and possibilities. Denver Univ. Law Rev. 66:419–36 [Google Scholar]
  121. Tyler TR. 2001. Public trust and confidence in legal authorities: What do majority and minority group members want from the law and legal institutions?. Behav. Sci. Law 19:215–35 [Google Scholar]
  122. Tyler TR. 2006a. Why People Obey the Law Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  123. Tyler TR. 2006b. Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 57:375–400 [Google Scholar]
  124. Tyler TR. 2009. Legitimacy and criminal justice: the benefits of self-regulation. Ohio State J. Crim. Law 7:307–59 [Google Scholar]
  125. Tyler TR. 2011. Why People Cooperate: The Role of Social Motivations Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  126. Tyler TR. 2017. Can the police enhance their popular legitimacy through their conduct?. Ill. Law Rev In press [Google Scholar]
  127. Tyler TR, Blader S. 2000. Cooperation in Groups: Procedural Justice, Social Identity, and Behavioral Engagement Philadelphia: Psychology [Google Scholar]
  128. Tyler TR, Callahan PE, Frost J. 2007a. Armed, and dangerous(?): motivating rule adherence among agents of social control. Law Soc. Rev. 41:2457–92 [Google Scholar]
  129. Tyler TR, Fagan J. 2008. Legitimacy and cooperation: Why do people help the police fight crime in their communities. Ohio State J. Crim. Law 6:230–74 [Google Scholar]
  130. Tyler TR, Fagan J, Geller A. 2014. Street stops and police legitimacy. J. Empir. Legal Stud. 11:4751–85 [Google Scholar]
  131. Tyler TR, Huo YJ. 2002. Trust in the Law: Encouraging Public Cooperation with the Police and Courts New York: Russell Sage Found. [Google Scholar]
  132. Tyler TR, Jackson J. 2014. Popular legitimacy and the exercise of legal authority: motivating compliance, cooperation and engagement. Psychol. Public Policy Law 20:78–95 [Google Scholar]
  133. Tyler TR, Lind EA. 1992. A relational model of authority in groups. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology M Zanna 25115–91 London: Academic [Google Scholar]
  134. Tyler TR, Sherman L, Strang H, Barnes GC, Woods D. 2007b. Reintegrative shaming, procedural justice, and recidivism: the engagement of offenders' psychological mechanisms in the Canberra RISE drinking-and-driving experiment. Law Soc. Rev. 41:553–86 [Google Scholar]
  135. Urban Inst. 2016. Evaluation of the National Initiative Procedural Justice Training Program Washington, DC: Urban Inst. [Google Scholar]
  136. Vainio A. 2011. Why are forest owners satisfied with forest police decisions? Legitimacy, procedural justice, and perceived uncertainty. Soc. Justice Res. 24:239 [Google Scholar]
  137. Van Craen M, Skogan WG. 2016. Achieving fairness in policing: the link between internal and external procedural justice. Police Q 20:3–23 [Google Scholar]
  138. Van Damme A, Pauwels L, Svensson R. 2015. Why do Swedes cooperate with the police? A SEM analysis of Tyler's procedural justice model. Eur. J. Crim. Policy Res. 21:15–33 [Google Scholar]
  139. Wales HW, Virginia A, Bradley R. 2010. Procedural justice and the mental health court judge's role in reducing recidivism. Int. J. Law Psychiatry 33:265–71 [Google Scholar]
  140. Walker L, LaTour S, Lind A, Thibaut J. 1974. Reactions of participants and observers to modes of adjudication. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 4:295–310 [Google Scholar]
  141. Wallace D, Papachristos AV, Meares T, Fagan J. 2016. Desistance and legitimacy: the impact of offender notification meetings on recidivism among high risk offenders. Justice Q 33:1237–64 [Google Scholar]
  142. Ward JT. 2011. Caught in their own speed trap: the intersection of speed enforcement policy, police legitimacy, and decision acceptance. Police Q 14:251–76 [Google Scholar]
  143. Watson AC, Angell B. 2013. The role of stigma and uncertainty in moderating the effect of procedural justice on cooperation and resistance in police encounters with persons with mental illnesses. Psychol. Public Policy Law 19:30–39 [Google Scholar]
  144. Wemmers JM. 1996. Victims in the Criminal Justice System Amsterdam: Kugler [Google Scholar]
  145. Wemmers JM. 2013. Victims' experiences in the criminal justice system and their recovery from crime. Int. Rev. Vict. 19:221–33 [Google Scholar]
  146. Wenzel M. 2002. The impact of outcome orientation and justice concerns on tax compliance: the role of taxpayers' identity. J. Appl. Psychol. 87:4629–45 [Google Scholar]
  147. White MD, Mulvey P, Dario LM. 2016. Arrestees' perceptions of the police: exploring procedural justice, legitimacy, and willingness to cooperate with police across offender types. Crim. Justice Behav. 43:343–64 [Google Scholar]
  148. Wolfe SE, Piquero AR. 2011. Organizational justice and police misconduct. Crim. Justice Behav. 38:332–53 [Google Scholar]
  149. Worden RE, McLean SJ. 2014. Assessing Police Performance in Citizen Encounters: Police Legitimacy and Management Accountability Albany: John Finn Inst. Public Saf. [Google Scholar]
  150. Worden RE, McLean SJ. 2016. Measuring, managing, and enhancing procedural justice in policing. Crim. Justice Policy Rev. In press [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110316-113318
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error