1932

Abstract

The American legal academy has witnessed intense ideological assaults in recent decades, as political conservatives have sought to recast legal education and produce a different kind of legal professional. However, the paths by which conservatives have approached the law schools differ. Some conservative campaigns to remake American legal education have highlighted their ideological agenda, whereas other campaigns have taken steps to keep their ideological goals hidden. This review illustrates both strategies but dedicates special attention to conservative forces that have pursued the latter strategy of ideological concealment.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-050520-100205
2022-10-18
2024-06-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/lawsocsci/18/1/annurev-lawsocsci-050520-100205.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-050520-100205&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Alliance for Justice 1993. Justice for Sale: Shortchanging the Public Interest for Private Gain Washington, DC: Alliance for Justice
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Am. Bar Assoc 1980. Law schools and professional education: report and recommendations of the Special Committee for a Study of Legal Education Rep., Am. Bar Assoc. Chicago:
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Assoc. Am. Law Schools 1989. The AALS Directory of Law Teachers 1989–90 St. Paul, MN/Westbury, NY: West Publ. Co./Foundation
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Assoc. Am. Law Schools 1990. The AALS Directory of Law Teachers 1990–91 St. Paul, MN/Westbury, NY: West Publ. Co./Found.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Baum L, Devins N. 2017. Federalist court: how the Federalist Society became the de facto selector of Republican Supreme Court justices. Slate Jan. 31. https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2017/01/how-the-federalist-society-became-the-de-facto-selector-of-republican-supreme-court-justices.html
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Baumgardner P. 2019a. Originalism and the academy in exile. Law Hist. Rev. 37:787–807
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Baumgardner P. 2019b.. “ Something he and his people naturally would be drawn to”: the Reagan administration and the law-and-economics movement. Pres. Stud. Q. 49:959–75
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Baumgardner P. 2021a. Immunizing the flock: how the pandemic court rewrote religious freedom. Laws 10:12
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Baumgardner P 2021b. Critical Legal Studies and the Campaign for American Law Schools: A Revolution to Break the Liberal Consensus Cham, Switz: Palgrave Macmillan
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Baumgardner P, Mehrotra AK. 2021. From the periphery to the center and back? A brief history of Midwest Legal Realism. Research Handbook on Modern Legal Realism S Talesh, E Mertz, H Klug 49–66 Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bennett D. 2017. Defending Faith: The Politics of the Christian Conservative Legal Movement Lawrence: Univ. Press Kans.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Bernstein A. 2005. Whatever happened to law and economics?. Md. Law Rev. 64:303–36
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Bernstein D. 2008. The influence of the Olin Programs in Law and Economics at Yale Law School and otherwise. The Volokh Conspiracy Feb. 26. https://volokh.com/posts/1204019661.html
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Bork RH. 1985. The role of the courts in applying economics. Antitrust Law J. 54:21–26
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Bork RH. 1990. The Tempting of America: The Political Seduction of the Law New York: Touchstone
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Buckley WF Jr. 1951. God and Man at Yale: The Superstitions of “Academic Freedom.” Chicago: Henry Regnery
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Burbank SB, Farhang S. 2017. Rights and Retrenchment: The Counterrevolution Against Federal Litigation New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Case MA. 2016. Is there a lingua franca for the American Legal Academy?. The New Legal Realism, Vol. I: Translating Law-and-Society for Today's Legal Practice E Mertz, S Macaulay, TW Mitchell 289–97 New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Cato Inst 1987. Dean Manne honored at Cato. Cato Policy Report, Vol. 9: Jan./Feb .
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Crane DA. 2019. A premature postmortem on the Chicago School of Antitrust. Bus. Hist. Rev. 93:759–76
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Crovitz LG. 1990. George Mason's entrepreneurial law dean preaches economics. Wall Street Journal April 4, p. A25
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Decker J. 2016. The Other Rights Revolution: Conservative Lawyers and the Remaking of American Government New York: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  23. DeParle J. 2005. Goals reached, donor on right closes up shop. New York Times May 29. https://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/29/politics/goals-reached-donor-on-right-closes-up-shop.html
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Devins N, Baum L. 2019. The Company They Keep: How Partisan Divisions Came to the Supreme Court New York: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Dugger CW. 1980. Paid course may pass judges’ group. Washington Post Aug. 23, p. C1
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Easterbrook FH. 1989. The inevitability of law and economics. Legal Educ. Rev. 1:3–28
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Epstein RA. 1985. Positive and normative elements in legal education. Harvard J. Law Public Policy 8:255–61
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Epstein RA. 1993. Legal education and the politics of exclusion. Stanford Law Rev. 45:1607–26
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Gann PB. 1989. From the Dean. Duke Law Magazine Summer 3–4
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Goetz CJ. 1989. The courtship of law and economics. Hamline Law Rev. 12:245–59
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Hackney JR Jr. 2007. Under Cover of Science: American Legal-Economic Theory and the Quest for Objectivity Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Hackney JR Jr. 2012. Legal Intellectuals in Conversation: Reflections on the Construction of Contemporary American Legal Theory New York/London: New York University Press
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Hedges CL 1982. Conference on Legal Education in the 1980s Chicago, New York: Am. Bar Assoc. Sect. Legal Educ. Admiss. Bar, NYU School Law
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Hertel-Fernandez A. 2019. State Capture: How Conservative Activists, Big Businesses, and Wealthy Donors Reshaped the American States—and the Nation New York: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Hollis-Brusky A. 2015. Ideas with Consequences: The Federalist Society and the Conservative Counterrevolution New York: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Hollis-Brusky A, Wilson JC. 2020. Separate but Faithful: The Christian Right's Radical Struggle to Transform Law & Legal Culture New York: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Horowitz M. 1980. The public interest law movement: an analysis with special reference to the role and practices of conservative public interest law firms Memo, Scaife Found. Pittsburgh, PA:
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Kalman L. 2021. East Coast Legal Realism and its progeny. Research Handbook on Modern Legal Realism S Talesh, E Mertz, H Klug 36–48 Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Keck TM. 2004. The Most Activist Supreme Court in History: The Road to Modern Judicial Conservatism Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Kennedy D. 1980. Toward an historical understanding of legal consciousness: the case of classical legal thought in America, 1850–1940. Res. Law Sociol. 3:3–24
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Kennedy D. 1982. Legal education and the reproduction of hierarchy. J. Legal Educ. 32:591–615
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Kersch KI. 2019. Conservatives and the Constitution: Imagining Constitutional Restoration in the Heyday of American Liberalism New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Laats A. 2018. Fundamentalist U: Keeping the Faith in American Higher Education New York: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Law Econ. Cent 1981. Law and Economics…The Promise and the Prospect at Emory University Atlanta, GA: Emory Univ.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Law Econ. Cent 1989. Untitled pamphlet Doc., George Mason Univ. School Law Fairfax, VA:
    [Google Scholar]
  46. MacLean N. 2017. Democracy in Chains: The Deep History of the Radical Right's Stealth Plan for America New York: Viking
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Manne HG. 1981. Law and economics: the story of a happy marriage. Emory Lawyer Dec., pp. 7–9
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Manne HG. 1993. An Intellectual History of the George Mason University School of Law Fairfax, VA: Law Econ. Cent. https://www.law.gmu.edu/about/history
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Manne HG. 2005. How law and economics was marketed in a hostile world: a very personal history. The Origins of Law and Economics: Essays by the Founding Fathers F Parisi, CK Rowley 309–27 Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar
    [Google Scholar]
  50. McCloskey DN. 1988. The rhetoric of law and economics. Mich. Law Rev. 86:752–67
    [Google Scholar]
  51. McCluskey MT. 2011. How money for legal scholarship disadvantages feminism. Issues Legal Scholarsh. 9:2539
    [Google Scholar]
  52. McKay RB. 1985. What law schools can and should do (and sometimes do). N.Y. Law School Law Rev. 30:491–515
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Miller JJ. 2006. A Gift of Freedom: How the John M. Olin Foundation Changed America San Francisco: Encount. Books
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Nash GH. 2006. The Conservative Intellectual Movement in America Since 1945, Thirtieth-Anniversary Edition Wilmington, DE: ISI Books
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Peretti TJ. 2020. Partisan Supremacy: How the GOP Enlisted Courts to Rig America's Election Rules Lawrence: Univ. Press Kans.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Posner RA. 1972. Volume one of the Journal of Legal Studies—an afterword. J. Legal Stud. 1:43740
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Posner RA. 1987. The decline of law as an autonomous discipline: 1962–1987. Harvard Law Rev. 100:761–80
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Posner RA. 1988. Comment on Donohue. Law Soc. Rev. 22:927–30
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Posner RA. 1989a. The future of law and economics: a comment on Ellickson. Chicago-Kent Law Rev. 65:57–62
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Posner RA 1989b. Foreword. Essays in Law and Economics: Corporations, Accident Prevention and Compensation for Losses M Faure, RA Posner, R Van Den Bergh 5–6 Antwerp, Belg: Maklu
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Powell LF Jr. 1971. Attack on American free enterprise system Confid. Memo., Aug. 23
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Priest GL. 1982. The best evidence of the effect of products liability law on the accident rate: reply. Yale Law J. 91:1386–401
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Priest GL. 2005. The rise of law and economics: a memoir of the early years. The Origins of Law and Economics: Essays by the Founding Fathers F Parisi, CK Rowley 350–82 Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Rostain T. 2000. Educating homo economicus: cautionary notes on the new behavioral law and economics movement. Law Soc. Rev. 34:973–1006
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Southworth A. 2008. Lawyers of the Right: Professionalizing the Conservative Coalition Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Staszak S. 2015. No Day in Court: Access to Justice and the Politics of Judicial Retrenchment New York: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Sunstein CR. 2001. On academic fads and fashions. Mich. Law Rev. 99:1251–64
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Teles SM. 2008. The Rise of the Conservative Legal Movement Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Teles SM. 2009. Transformative bureaucracy: Reagan's lawyers and the dynamics of political investment. Stud. Am. Political Dev. 23:61–83
    [Google Scholar]
  70. TerBeek C. 2021.. “ Clocks must always be turned back”: Brown v. Board of Education and the racial origins of constitutional originalism. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 115:821–34
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Ulen TS. 1997. Firmly grounded: economics in the future of the law. Wis. Law Rev. 1997:433–63
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Wiener J. 1990. Dollars for neocon scholars. The Nation Jan. 1 12–14
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Yale Law School 1986. Lexcetera. Yale Law Report Fall 12–14
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-050520-100205
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error