1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Law and Social Science
  4. Volume 15, 2019
  5. Article

Annual Review of Law and Social Science

Volume 15, 2019

Populism and Democratic Theory

Abstract

Commentators routinely describe “populism” as vague. Some argue that the early US populists, who coined the modern usage, were not populists. We disagree and identify this common conceptual core: the “people” in a moral battle against “elites.” The core definition fits all cases of populism: those on the left and right, those in the United States, Europe, and elsewhere. In addition to this minimal common core, we identify strongly suggested and frequently correlated non-core characteristics. These include the people's homogeneity and exclusivity, direct rule, and nationalism, as well as a single leader, vilification of vulnerable out-groups, and impatience with deliberation. The US Populist Party and Spain's Podemos Party fit the core definition but have few of the other characteristics. The core can be good for democracy, we argue, while the associated characteristics are often dangerous. Populism in opposition can be good for democracy, while populism in power carries great risks.

Keyword(s): antipluralism, core-plus, democratic theory, leader, liberal democracy, populism
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042843
2019-10-13
2024-12-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/lawsocsci/15/1/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042843.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042843&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abts K, Rummens S. 2007. Populism versus democracy. Political Stud 55:2405–24
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Achen CH, Bartels L. 2016. Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Albertazzi D, McDonnell D 2008. Twenty-First Century Populism: The Spectre of Western European Democracy Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Albright M. 2018. Fascism: A Warning New York: Harper Collins
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Am. Natl. Elect. Stud. (ANES) 2012. American National Election Study Ann Arbor, MI: Am. Natl. Elect. Stud. accessed June 18, 2019. http://isr-anesweb.isr.umich.edu/ANES_Data_Tools/variable_v2.html?year=2012&variable=electintpo_richbuy
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Arato A. 2015. Political theology and populism. The Promise and Perils of Populism: Global Perspectives ed. C de la Torre 31–58 Lexington: Univ. Press Ky.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Arato A, Cohen JL. 2017. Civil society, populism and religion. Constellations 24:3283–95
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Autor D, Dorn D, Hanson G, Majlesi K 2016. Importing political polarization? The electoral consequences of rising trade exposure Work. Pap. 22637, NBER. http://www.nber.org/papers/w22637
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bartlett KT. 1990. Feminist legal methods. Harvard Law Rev 103:829–88
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Bennhold K. 2018. A new coalition with Merkel? Not so fast. New York Times Jan. 19. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/19/world/europe/angela-merkel-germany-spd.html
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bohman J. 2005. From Demos to Demoi: democracy across borders. Ratio Juris 18:3293–314
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Bonikowski B, Gidron N. 2016a. Multiple traditions in populism research: toward a theoretical synthesis. APSA Comp. Politics Newsl. 26:27–14
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Bonikowski B, Gidron N 2016b. The populist style in American politics: presidential campaign discourse, 1952–1996. Soc. Forces 94:41593–621
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Brown S. 2017. Sen. Sherrod Brown: Donald Trump and Marine Le Pen are fake populists. Cincinnati.com May 10. https://www.cincinnati.com/story/opinion/contributors/2017/05/10/sen-sherrod-brown-donald-trump-and-marine-le-pen-fake-populists/101509228/
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Canovan M. 1981. Populism London: Junction Books
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Canovan M. 2002. Taking politics to the people: populism as the ideology of democracy. Democracies and the Populist Challenge ed. Y Mény, Y Surel 25–44 London: Palgrave Macmillan
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Converse PE. 1964. The nature of belief systems in mass publics. Ideology and Discontent ed. DE Apter 206–61 New York: Free Press Glencoe
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Cramer K. 2016. The Politics of Resentment: Rural Consciousness in Wisconsin and the Rise of Scott Walker Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  19. De Nadal LA. 2018. From “horizontal” to “vertical”: the institutionalization of the Indignados Movement Paper delivered at the International Communications Association Annual Conference, Prague, May
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Errejón I (with G Boutin, A Devecchio) 2018. La plus grande reforme qui soit est celle de l'ordre. La Figaro, March 30. http://www.lefigaro.fr/vox/politique/2018/03/30/31001-20180330ARTFIG00244-iigo-errejn-la-plus-grande-reforme-qui-soit-est-celle-de-l-ordre.php
  21. Í and C. | 2016
    Errejón Í, Mouffe C. 2016. Podemos: In the Name of the People London: Lawrence & Wishart
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Fisher R, Ury W, Patton B 1991. Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In New York: Penguin Books. , 2nd ed..
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Frank J. 2017. Populism and praxis. See Kaltwasser et al. 2017 629–43
  24. Frankfurt HG. 2005. On Bullshit Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Fraser N. 1995. From redistribution to recognition? Dilemmas of justice in a “post-socialist” age. New Left Rev 1:21268–93
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Freeden M. 1996. Ideologies and Political Theory: A Conceptual Approach Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Gallie WB 1955–1956. Essentially contested concepts. Proc. Aristot. Soc. 56:167–98
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Galston WA. 2018. Anti-Pluralism: The Populist Threat to Liberal Democracy New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Garvin WL, Daws SO. 1887. History of the National Farmers’ Alliance and Cooperative Union of America Jacksboro, TX: J. N. Rogers & Co.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Gidron N, Hall PA. 2018. Populism as a problem of social integration Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, Aug. 31
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Gilens M, Page BI. 2014. Testing theories of American politics: elites, interest groups, and average citizens. Perspect. Politics 12:3564–81
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Goodin RW. 2007. Enfranchising all affected interests, and its alternatives. Philos. Public Aff. 35:140–68
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Goodwyn L. 1976. The Populist Moment: A Short History of the Agrarian Revolt in America Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Grofman B, Feld SL. 1988. Rousseau's general will: a Condorcetian perspective. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 82:2567–76
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Hall PA. 2019. The electoral politics of growth regimes. Perspect. Politics. In press
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Hawkins KA. 2010. Venezuela's Chavismo and Populism in Comparative Perspective Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Hetherington M, Weiler JD. 2009. Authoritarianism and Polarization in American Politics Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Honneth A. 1995 (1992). The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts transl. J Anderson Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Iglesias P. 2015. Discurso íntegro de Pablo Iglesias en la Puerta del Sol. Lamarea Feb 4. http://www.lamarea.com/2015/02/04/discurso-integro-de-pablo-iglesias-en-la-puerta-del-sol/
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Inglehart RF, Norris P. 2016. Trump, Brexit, and the rise of populism: economic have-nots and cultural backlash Work. Pap. RWP16–026, Fac. Res. Ser., Harvard Kennedy School Cambridge, MA:
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Ionescue G, Gellner E. 1969. Populism: Its Meaning and National Characteristics London: Macmillan
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Ivaldi G, Lanzone ME, Woods D 2017. Varieties of populism across a left-right spectrum: the case of the Front National, the Northern League, Podemos and Five Star Movement. Swiss Political Sci. Rev. 23:4354–76
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Ivarsflaten E. 2008. What unites right-wing populists in Western Europe? Re-examining grievance mobilization models in seven successful cases. Comp. Political Stud. 41:13–23
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Judis JB. 2016. The Populist Explosion: How the Great Recession Transformed American and European Politics New York: Columbia Glob. Rep.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Kaltwasser CR, Taggart P, Ochoa Espejo P, Ostiguy P 2017. The Oxford Handbook of Populism Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Kazin M. 2017a. Working too hard for too little: an interview with Senator Sherrod Brown. Dissent 64:325–31
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Kazin M. 2017b. The Populist Persuasion: An American History Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press. , 2nd ed..
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Kriesi H. 2014. The populist challenge. West Eur. Politics 37:2361–78
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Laclau E. 2005. On Populist Reason London: Verso
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Lax DA, Sebenius JK. 2006. 3-D Negotiation: Powerful Tools to Change the Game in Your Most Important Deals Cambridge, MA: Harvard Bus. School Press
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Lessig L. 2011. Republic, Lost: How Money Corrupts Congress—and a Plan to Stop It New York: Twelve/Hachett
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Lévi-Strauss C. 1950. Introduction à l'oeuvre de Marcel Mauss. Mauss, Sociologie et Anthropologie Paris: Presses Univ. France
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Levitsky S, Ziblatt D. 2018. How Democracies Die New York: Crown Publ.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Mansbridge J. 2019. Recursive representation. Creating Political Presence ed. D Castiglione, J Pollak 298–337 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Mansbridge J, Macedo S, Foster C 2019. Populism and democratic theory: an extended view Paper delivered at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, SSRN. https://www.ssrn.com
    [Google Scholar]
  56. McCormick JP. 2011. Machiavellian Democracy Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  57. McNall SG. 1988. The Road to Rebellion: Class Formation and Kansas Populism, 1865–1900 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Mitchell TR. 1987. Political Education in the Southern Farmers’ Alliance, 1887–1900 Madison: Univ. Wis. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Mouffe C. 2018. For a Left Populism London: Verso
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Mudde C. 2004. The populist zeitgeist. Gov. Oppos. 39:4541–63
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Mudde C. 2007. Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Mudde C. 2017. Populism: an ideational approach. See Kaltwasser et al. 2017 27–47
  63. Mudde C, Kaltwasser CR. 2017. Populism: A Very Short Introduction Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Müller J-W. 2016. What Is Populism? Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Mussolini B, Gentile G. 1935 (1932). The doctrine of fascism. Fascism Doctrine and Institutions ed. B Mussolini 7–42 Rome: Ardita Publ. http://www.worldfuturefund.org/wffmaster/Reading/Germany/mussolini.htm
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Norris P. 2015. Why Elections Fail Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Ober J. 2017. Demopolis: Democracy Before Liberalism in Theory and Practice Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Ochoa Espejo PO. 2017. Populism and the idea of the people. See Kaltwasser et al. 2017 607–28
  69. Panizza F. 2005. Introduction. Populism and the Mirror of Democracy ed. F Panizza 1–31 London: Verso
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Pedler A. 1927. Going to the people: the Russian Narodniki in 1874–5. Slavon. Rev. 6:16130–41
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Piketty T. 2018. Brahmin left versus merchant right: rising inequality and the changing structure of political conflict (evidence from France, Britain and the US, 1948–2017 Work. Pap. Ser. No. 2018/7, WID.world, World Inequal. Lab
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Przeworski A, Sprague J. 1988. Paper Stones: A History of Electoral Socialism Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Rawls J. 1999. The Law of Peoples Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Rodrik D. 2018a. In defense of economic populism. Project Syndicate Jan 9. https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/defense-of-economic-populism-by-dani-rodrik-2018-01
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Rodrik D. 2018b. Is populism necessarily bad economics?. AEA Pap. Proc. 108:196–99
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Rodrik D. 2018c. Populism and the economics of globalization. J. Int. Bus. Policy 1:1–212–33
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Rosanvallon P. 2008 (2006). Counter-Democracy: Politics in an Age of Distrust transl. A Goldhammer Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Rousseau J-J. 1997 (1762). The social contract. The Second Contract and Other Later Political Writings transl. V Gourevitch Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Sabel CF, Zeitlin J. 2008. Learning from difference: the new architecture of experimentalist governance in the EU. Eur. Law J. 14:271–327
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Saxton A. 1971. The Indispensable Enemy: Labor and the Anti-Chinese Movement in California Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Schumpeter JA. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy New York: Harper and Brothers
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Sherif M, Harvey OJ, Jack White B, Hood WR, Sherif CW 1961 (1954). Intergroup Conflict and Cooperation: The Robbers Cave Experiment Norman, OK: Univ. Book Exch.
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Stanley B. 2008. The thin ideology of populism. J. Political Ideol. 13:195–110
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Stilz A 2009. Liberal Loyalty: Freedom, Obligation, and the State Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Tajfel H 1970. Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Sci. Am. 223:596–103
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Tamir Y 1993. Liberal Nationalism Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Taylor C 1992. Multiculturalism and “the Politics of Recognition.” Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Tindall GB 1966. A Populist Reader: Selections from the Works of American Populist Leaders New York: Harper Torchbooks
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Urbinati N 1998. Democracy and populism. Constellations 5:1110–24
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Urbinati N 2014. Democracy Disfigured: Opinion, Truth, and the People Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Urbinati N 2019a. Me the People: How Populism Transforms Democracy Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Urbinati N 2019b. Political theory of populism. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 22111–27
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Walicki A 1969. Russia. See Ionescue & Gellner 1969 62–96
  94. Walzer M 1983. Spheres of Justice New York: Basic Books
     [Google Scholar]
  95. Wittgenstein L 1967 (1953). Philosophical Investigations transl. G.E.M. Anscobe Oxford, UK: Blackwell
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Wodak R 2015. The Politics of Fear: What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean London: Sage
     [Google Scholar]
  97. Woodward CV 1938. Tom Watson and the Negro in agrarian politics. J. South. Hist. 4:114–33
     [Google Scholar]
  98. Woodward CV 1959–1960. The populist heritage and the intellectual. Am. Sch. 29:155–72
     [Google Scholar]
  99. Woodward CV 1973 (1938). Tom Watson: Agrarian Rebel Savannah, GA: Beehive
     [Google Scholar]
  100. World Values Survey 2013. Wave 2010–2014, Germany, variable V228G accessed on June 15, 2019. http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSOnline.jsp
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042843
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error