1932

Abstract

Intersectionality as a framework and praxis has gathered significance in law and the social sciences over the past 20 years. This article begins by reviewing how intersectionality has been conceptualized, as well as the implications of varying definitions attributed to intersectionality. We then explore applications of intersectionality, first in research that focuses on uncovering processes of differentiation and systems of inequality across a range of topics, including reproductive rights, colonization, religion, immigration, and political behavior. After examining these processes and systems, we turn to a second research approach that focuses on categories of difference and between-category relationships. We find that despite different views on conceptualization, application, and implications, intersectionality may nevertheless open new avenues of inquiry for scholars as well as opportunities for transformative coalition building in social movements and grassroots organizations.

[Erratum, Closure]

An erratum has been published for this article:
Erratum: Intersectionality: From Theory to Practice
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042942
2019-10-13
2024-10-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/lawsocsci/15/1/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042942.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042942&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Adam EM 2017. Intersectional coalitions: the paradoxes of rights-based movement building in LGBTQ and immigrant communities. Law Soc. Rev. 51:132–67
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Alexander-Floyd NG 2018. Why political scientists don't study Black women, but historians and sociologists do: on intersectionality and the remapping of the study of Black political women. Black Women in Politics: Demanding Citizenship, Challenging Power, and Seeking Justice JZ Jordan-Zachery, NG Alexander-Floyd 5–26 Albany: State Univ. N. Y. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Al-Faham H, Ernst R 2016. Between society and the state: gendered racialization and Muslim Americans. Stud. Law Politics Soc. 70:125–47
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Alinia M 2015. On Black Feminist Thought: thinking oppression and resistance through intersectional paradigm. Ethnic Racial Stud 38:132334–40
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Anthias F 2012. Intersectional what? Social division, intersectionality, and levels of analysis. Ethnicities 13:13–19
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Avishai O 2008. “Doing religion” in a secular world: women in conservative religions and the question of agency. Gender Soc 22:409–33
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bartkowski JP, Ramos-Wada A, Ellison CG, Acevedo GA 2012. Faith, race-ethnicity, and public policy preferences: religious schemas and abortion attitudes among U.S. Latinos. J. Sci. Study Relig. 51:343–58
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Berry TR 2014. Internationalization, internalization, and intersectionality of identity: a critical race feminist re-images curriculum. J. Curric. Theor. 30:14–14
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bilge S 2013. Intersectionality undone: saving intersectionality from feminist intersectionality studies. Du Bois Rev 10:2405–24 https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742058X13000283
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  10. Brown NE 2014. Political participation of Women of Color: an intersectional analysis. J. Women Politics Policy 35:315–48
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Capers KJ, Smith CW 2016. Straddling identities: identity cross-pressures on Black immigrants’ policy preferences. Politics Groups Identities 4:3393–424
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Carastathis A 2013. Identity categories as potential coalitions. J. Women Cult. Soc. 38:4941–65
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Carbado DW 2013. Colorblind intersectionality. Signs 38:4811–45 https://doi.org/10.1086/669666
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  14. Carbado DW, Gulati M 2013. The intersectional fifth Black Woman. Du Bois Rev 10:2527–40 https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742058X13000301
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  15. Cho S 2013. Post-intersectionality: the curious reception of intersectionality in legal scholarship. Du Bois Rev 10:2385–404 https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742058X13000362
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cho S, Crenshaw KW, McCall L 2013. Toward a field of intersectionality studies: theory, applications, and praxis. Signs 38:4785–810 https://doi.org/10.1086/669608
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  17. Chun JJ, Lipsitz G, Shin Y 2013. Intersectionality as a social movement strategy: Asian immigrant women advocates. Signs 38:4917–40
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Cohen CJ 1999. The Boundaries of Blackness: AIDS and the Breakdown of Black Politics Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Collins PH 2000. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment New York: Routledge. , 2nd ed..
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Collins PH 2015. Intersectionality's definitional dilemmas. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 41:11–20 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112142
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  21. Combahee River Collective 1979. A Black feminist statement. Off Our Backs 9:66–8
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Crenshaw K 1989. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: a Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. Univ. Chicago Legal Forum 1989:1139–67
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Crenshaw K 1991. Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity-politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Rev 43:61241–99
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Dana K, Lajevardi N, Oskooii KA, Walker HL 2018. Veiled politics: experiences with discrimination among Muslim Americans. Politics Relig 2018:1–49 https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755048318000287
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  25. Davis AM, Ernst R 2017. Racial gaslighting. Politics Groups Identities1–14 https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2017.1403934
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  26. Davis K 2008. Intersectionality as buzzword: a sociology of science perspective on what makes a feminist theory successful. Fem. Theory 9:167–85 https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700108086364
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  27. Dawson MC 1994. Behind the Mule: Race and Class in African American Politics Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Delgado R 2011. Rodrigo's reconsideration: intersectionality and the future of Critical Race Theory. Iowa Law Rev 96:41247–88
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Dhamoon R 2010. Identity/Difference Politics: How Difference Is Produced, and Why It Matters Vancouver: UBC Press
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Dhamoon RK 2011. Considerations on mainstreaming intersectionality. Political Res. Q. 64:1230–43
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Dottolo AL, Stewart AJ 2008. “Don't ever forget now, you're a Black man in America”: intersections of race, class and gender in encounters with the police. Sex Roles 59:5–6350–64 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9387-x
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  32. Ernst R, Luft RE 2017. Welfare, poverty and low-wage employment. The Oxford Handbook of U.S. Women's Social Movement Activism HJ McCammon, LA Banaszak, V Taylor, J Reger New York: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Fraga LR, Martinez-Ebers V, Lopez L, Ramirez R 2005. Strategic Intersectionality: Gender, Ethnicity, and Political Incorporation Berkeley, CA: Inst. Gov. Stud.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. García Bedolla L 2007. Intersections of inequality: understanding marginalization and privilege in the post-Civil Rights era. Politics Gend 3:2232–48
    [Google Scholar]
  35. García Bedolla L 2014. How an intersectional approach can help to transform the university. Politics Gend 10:3447–55
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Glennon T 2016. The developmental perspective and intersectionality. Temple Law Rev 88:929–42
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Gordon L 2016. “Intersectionality”, socialist feminism and contemporary activism: musings by a second-wave socialist feminist. Gender Hist 28:2340–57 https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0424.12211
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  38. Gotanda N 2011. The racialization of Islam in American law. Ann. Am. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 637:1184–95
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Guenther KM, Pendaz S, Makene FS 2011. The impact of intersecting dimensions of inequality and identity on the racial status of eastern African immigrants. Sociol. Forum 26:198–120
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Guhin J 2018. Colorblind Islam: the racial hinges of immigrant Muslims in the United States. Soc. Incl. 6:287–97
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Hancock A-M 2007. Intersectionality as a normative and empirical paradigm. Politics Gend 3:2248–54
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Hancock A-M 2011. Solidarity Politics for Millennials: A Guide for Ending the Oppression Olympics New York: Palgrave Macmillan
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Hancock A-M 2013. Empirical intersectionality: a tale of two approaches symposium issue: Critical Race Theory and empirical methods. UC Irvine Law Rev 3:259–96
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Hancock A-M 2016. Intersectionality: An Intellectual History New York: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Harris A, Leonardo Z 2018. Intersectionality, race-gender subordination, and education. Rev. Res. Educ. 42:11–27
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Harrison L 2017. Redefining intersectionality theory through the lens of African American young adolescent girls’ racialized experiences. Youth Soc 49:81023–39 https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X15569216
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  47. Jordan-Zachery JS 2006. Commentary: the practice and functioning of intersectionality and politics. J. Women Politics Policy 28:3–4205–12 https://doi.org/10.1300/J501v28n03_09
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  48. Jordan-Zachery JS 2018. “I ain't your darn help”: Black women as the help in intersectionality research in political science. Black Women in Politics: Demanding Citizenship, Challenging Power, and Seeking Justice JZ Jordan-Zachery, NG Alexander-Floyd 27–44 Albany: State Univ. N. Y. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Jordan-Zachery JS, Alexander-Floyd NG 2018. Black Women in Politics: Demanding Citizenship, Challenging Power, and Seeking Justice Albany: SUNY Press
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Junn J 2017. The Trump majority: white womanhood and the making of female voters in the U.S. Politics Groups Identities 5:2343–52
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Junn J, Masuoka N 2008. Identities in context: politicized racial group consciousness among Asian American and Latino youth. Appl. Dev. Sci. 12:293–101
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Lewis G 2013. Unsafe travel: experiencing intersectionality and feminist displacements. Signs 38:4869–92 https://doi.org/10.1086/669609
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  53. Lindsay K 2013. God, gays, and progressive politics: reconceptualizing intersectionality as a normatively malleable analytical framework. Perspect. Politics 11:2447–60 https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592713001047
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  54. Manuel T 2006. Envisioning the possibilities for a good life: exploring the public policy implications of intersectionality theory. J. Women Politics Policy 28:3–4173–203 https://doi.org/10.1300/J501v28n03_08
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  55. Martínez E 1998. De Colores Means All of Us: Latina Views for a Multi-Colored Century Cambridge, MA: South End
    [Google Scholar]
  56. McCall L 2001. Sources of racial wage inequality in metropolitan labor markets: racial, ethnic, and gender differences. Am. Sociol. Rev. 66:4520–41
    [Google Scholar]
  57. McCall L 2005. The complexity of intersectionality. Signs 30:31771–800
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Michener JC, Dilts A, Cohen CJ 2012. African American women: intersectionality in politics. The Oxford Handbook of African American Citizenship, 1865–Present LD Bobo, L Crooms-Robinson, L Darling-Hammond, MC Dawson, HL Gates Jr., G Jaynes, C Steele 1–32 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Mohamed HS 2012. Can protests make Latinos “American”? Identity, immigration, politics, and the 2006 marches. Am. Politics Res. 41:2298–327
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Moore HA, Acosta K, Perry G, Edwards C 2010. Splitting the academy: the emotions of intersectionality at work. Sociol. Q. 51:2179–204 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2010.01168.x
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  61. Moradi B, Grzanka PR 2017. Using intersectionality responsibly: toward critical epistemology, structural analysis, and social justice activism. J. Couns. Psychol. 64:5500–13 https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000203
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  62. Moss P, Maddrell A 2017. Emergent and divergent spaces in the Women's March: the challenges of intersectionality and inclusion. Gender Place Cult 24:5613–20
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Nash JC 2011. Home truths on intersectionality. Yale J. Law Fem. 23:1445–70
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Ocen PA 2013. Unshackling intersectionality. Du Bois Rev 10:2471–83 https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742058X13000295
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  65. Okolosie L 2014. Beyond “talking” and “owning” intersectionality. Fem. Rev. 108:90–96 https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.2014.14
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  66. Pappoe YN 2019. The shortcomings of Title VII for the Black female plaintiff. Univ. Pa. J. Law Soc. Change 22:11–23
    [Google Scholar]
  67. [Google Scholar]
  68. Prickett P 2018. Complexity beyond intersections: race, class, and neighborhood disadvantage among African American Muslims. Soc. Incl. 6:298–106
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Purkayastha B 2012. Intersectionality in a transnational world. Gend. Soc. 26:155–66
    [Google Scholar]
  70. [Google Scholar]
  71. Read JG, Eagle D 2011. Intersecting identities as a source of religious incongruence. J. Sci. Study Relig. 50:116–32
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Roberts D 2014. Complicating the triangle of race, class, and state: the insights of Black feminists. Ethnic Racial Stud 37:101776–82
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Robinson D 2018. Battering mothers for their abuser's crimes. Univ. San Franc. Law Rev. 52:149–74
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Rose-Redwood C, Rose-Redwood R 2017. “It definitely felt very white”: race, gender, and the performative politics of assembly at the Women's March in Victoria, British Columbia. Gender Place Cult 24:5645–54
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Selod S 2018. Forever Suspect: Racialized Surveillance of Muslim Americans in the War on Terror New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Sherkat D, De Vries KM, Creek S 2010. Race, religion, and opposition to same-sex marriage. Soc. Sci. Q. 91:80–98
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Simien EM 2007. Doing intersectionality research: from conceptual issues to practical examples. Politics Gend 3:2264–71 https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X07000086
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  78. Simpson AY 2011. From stigma to strategy: calculated identity positioning and Black women activists Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science, Seattle, WA
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Smith A 2005. Conquest: Sexual Violence and American Indian Genocide Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Smith A 2010. Dismantling hierarchy, queering society. Tikkun 25:460–61
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Strolovitch DZ 2007. Affirmative Advocacy: Race, Class, and Gender in Interest Group Politics Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Strolovitch DZ, Crowder CY 2018. Respectability, anti-respectability, and intersectionally responsible representation. PS 51:2340–44
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Strolovitch DZ, Wong JS, Proctor A 2017. A possessive investment in white heteropatriarchy? The 2016 election and the politics of race, gender, and sexuality. Politics Groups Identities 5:2353–63
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Tatari E, Sahin Mencutek Z 2015. Strategic intersectionality and political representation: female Muslim councilors in London. J. Women Politics Policy 36:415–39
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Tormos F 2017. Intersectional solidarity. Politics Groups Identities 5:4:707–20
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Troutt DD 2019. Cities, fair housing, and gentrification: a proposal in progressive federalism. Cardozo Law Rev 40:1177–206
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Tungohan E 2016. Intersectionality and social justice: assessing activists’ use of intersectionality through grassroots migrants’ organizations in Canada. Politics Groups Identities 4:3347–62
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Waters MC 1990. Ethnic Options: Choosing Identities in America Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Watts Smith C 2013. Ethnicity and the role of group consciousness: a comparison between African Americans and Black immigrants. Politics Groups Identities 1:2199–220
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Welborne BC, Westfall AL, Russell ÖÇ, Tobin SA 2018. The Politics of the Headscarf in the United States Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  91. Wilde MJ, Al-Faham H 2018. Believing in women? Examining early views of women among America's most progressive religious groups. Religions 9:10321
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Wilde MJ, Danielsen S 2014. Fewer and better children: race, class, religion, and birth control reform in America. Am. J. Sociol. 119:61710–60
    [Google Scholar]
  93. Wilde MJ, Glassman L 2016. How complex religion can improve our understanding of American politics. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 42:407–25
    [Google Scholar]
  94. Women's March 2017. Guiding Vision and Principles https://www.womensmarch.com/mission-and-principles
    [Google Scholar]
  95. Yang F 1999. ABC and XYZ: religious, ethnic, and racial identities of the new second generation Chinese in Christian churches. Amerasia J 25:89–114
    [Google Scholar]
  96. Yuval-Davis N 2012. Dialogical epistemology—an intersectional resistance to the “Oppression Olympics.”. Gend. Soc. 26:146–54
    [Google Scholar]
  97. Zepeda-Millán C, Wallace S 2013. Racialization in times of contention: how social movements influence Latino racial identity. Politics Groups Identities 1:4510–27
    [Google Scholar]
  98. Zevallos Z 2017. Intersectionality and the Women's March. The Other Sociologist Jan. 25. https://othersociologist.com/2017/01/25/intersectionality-womens-march/
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042942
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error