Field-Based Methods of Research on Human Rights Violations

Literature Cited

1. Advocates Hum. Rights 2011. A Practitioner's Guide to Human Rights Monitoring, Documentation, and Advocacy Minneapolis: Advocates Hum. Rights
   [Google Scholar]
2. Advocates Hum. Rights 2015. Human Rights Tools for a Changing World: A Step-by-Step Guide to Human Rights Fact-Finding, Documentation, and Advocacy Minneapolis: Advocates Hum. Rights
   [Google Scholar]
3. Alston P. 2000. Towards a human rights accountability index. J. Hum. Dev. 1:2249–71
   [Google Scholar]
4. Alston P. 2011. Hobbling the monitors: Should U.N. human rights monitors be accountable?. Harvard Int. Law J. 52:562–649
   [Google Scholar]
5. Alston P, Crawford J 2000. The Future of UN Human Rights Monitoring Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
   [Google Scholar]
6. Alston P, Knuckey S. 2016a. The Transformation of Human Rights Fact-Finding Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
   [Google Scholar]
7. Alston P, Knuckey S. 2016b. The transformation of human rights fact-finding: challenges and opportunities. See Alston & Knuckey 2016a 3–24
8. Amnesty Int 2002. Monitoring and Reporting Human Rights Violations in Africa: A Handbook for Community Activists Amsterdam: Amnesty Int.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Amnesty Int., Counc. Dev. Soc. Sci. Res. Afr 2000. UKWELI: Monitoring and Documenting Human Rights Violations in Africa: A Handbook Amsterdam/Dakar: Amnesty Int., Counc. Dev. Soc. Sci. Res. Afr.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Anaya J. 2004. Indigenous Peoples in International Law New York: Oxford Univ. Press. 2nd ed.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Andreassen BA, Sano H-O, McInerney-Lankford S 2018a. Research Methods in Human Rights: A Handbook Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar
    [Google Scholar]
12. Andreassen BA, Sano HO, McInerney-Lankford S 2018b. Human rights research method. See Andreassen et al. 2018a 1–13
13. Apodaca C. 2007. Measuring the progressive realization of economic and social rights. See Hertel & Minkler 2007 165–81
14. Archdioc. Guatem 1999. Guatemala: Never Again! Ossining, NY: Orbis Books
    [Google Scholar]
15. Archdioc. São Paulo 1998. Torture in Brazil: A Shocking Report on the Pervasive Use of Torture by Brazilian Military Governments, 1964–1979 Austin: Univ. Tex. Press
    [Google Scholar]
16. Argent. Natl. Comm. Disappeared 1986. Nunca Mas: The Report of the Argentine National Commission on the Disappeared New York: Farrar, Strauss & Giroux
    [Google Scholar]
17. Asale AA, Sanford V 2006. Engaged Observer: Anthropology, Advocacy, and Activism New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
18. Asher J, Banks D, Scheuren FJ 2008. Statistical Methods for Human Rights New York: Springer
    [Google Scholar]
19. Asia Indig. Peoples Pact 2015. Indigenous Peoples Human Rights Defenders Field Handbook on Human Rights Documentation and Advocacy Chiang Mai, Thail.: Asia Indig. Peoples Pact
    [Google Scholar]
20. Assoc. Prev. Torture 2004. Monitoring Places of Detention: A Practical Guide Geneva: Assoc. Prev. Torture
    [Google Scholar]
21. Bakar S. 2012. On Commissions of Inquiry (CoI) and Fact-Finding Missions (FFM) Oslo: Nor. Cent. Hum. Rights
    [Google Scholar]
22. Ball P. 1996. Who Did What to Whom? Planning and Implementing a Large Scale Human Rights Data Project Washington, DC: Am. Assoc. Adv. Sci.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Ball P. 2016. The bigness of big data: samples, models, and the facts we might find when looking at data. See Alston & Knuckey 2016a 425–40
24. Ball P, Spirer HF. 2000. Introduction. See Ball et al. 2000 1–12
25. Ball P, Spirer HF, Spirer L 2000. Making the Case: Investigating Large Scale Human Rights Violations Using Information Systems and Data Analysis Washington, DC: Am. Assoc. Adv. Sci.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Bassiouni MC. 2001. Appraising UN justice-related fact-finding missions. Wash. Univ. J. Law Policy 5:35–50
    [Google Scholar]
27. Bassiouni CM, Abraham C. 2013. Introduction: identification of issues in relation to UN fact-finding mechanisms. Int. Inst. High Stud. Crim. Sci. 20131–34
    [Google Scholar]
28. bell¿ngcat 2015. MH17: The Open Source Evidence Leicester, UK: bell¿ngcat https://www.bellingcat.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/MH17-The-Open-Source-Evidence-EN.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
29. Bijlmakers S. 2018. Corporate Social Responsibility, Human Rights and the Law New York: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
30. Can. Hum. Rights Found 2001. Training for Human Rights Trainers Book 1: Facilitator's Manual and Book 1: Participants Manual Montreal: Can. Hum. Rights Found.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Cançado Trindade AA. 2000. Reporting in the Inter-American system of human rights protection. See Alston & Crawford 2000 336–46
32. Cent. Vict. Torture 2004. Familiar Tools, Emerging Issues: Adapting Traditional Human Rights Monitoring to Emerging Issues Minneapolis: Cent. Vict. Torture
    [Google Scholar]
33. Chapman A. 1996. A “violations approach” for monitoring the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Hum. Rights Q. 18:123–66
    [Google Scholar]
34. Chapman A, Russell S. 2007. The status of efforts to monitor economic, social and cultural rights. See Hertel & Minkler 2007 143–64
35. Cingranelli DL, Richards DL. 2007. Measuring government effort to respect economic and social human rights: a peer benchmark. See Hertel & Minkler 2007 214–32
36. Cingranelli DL, Richards DL. 2010. The Cingranelli and Richards (CIRI) Human Rights Data Project. Hum. Rights Q. 32:401–24
    [Google Scholar]
37. Cohen DK. 2016. Rape during Civil War Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
38. Cohen DK, Nordås R. 2014. Sexual violence in armed conflict: introducing the SVAC dataset, 1989–2009. J. Peace Res. 51:3418–28
    [Google Scholar]
39. Comm. Hist. Clarification 1999. Guatemala: Memory of Silence: Report of Commission for Historical Clarification Conclusions and Recommendations Guatemala City: Comm. Hist. Clarification
    [Google Scholar]
40. Coomans F, Grünfeld F, Kamminga MT 2009a. Methods of Human Rights Research Antwerp, Belg.: Intersentia
    [Google Scholar]
41. Coomans F, Grünfeld F, Kamminga MT 2009b. A primer. See Coomans et al. 2009a 11–17
42. Corkery A. 2016. Investigating economic, social, and cultural rights violations. See Alston & Knuckey 2016a 377–95
43. Davenport C, Armstrong DA. 2004. Democracy and the violation of human rights: a statistical exploration from 1976 to 1996. Am. J. Political Sci. 48:3538–54
    [Google Scholar]
44. de Brouwer A-M, Ku C, Rómkens R, van den Herik K 2013. Sexual Violence as an International Crime: Interdisciplinary Approaches Cambridge, UK: Intersentia
    [Google Scholar]
45. de Greiff 2016. “Truth without facts”: on the erosion of the fact-finding function of truth commissions. See Alston & Knuckey 2016a 281–302
46. de Waal A. 2015. Genealogies of transnational activism. Advocacy in Conflict: Critical Perspectives on Transnational Activism A de Waal 18–45 London: Zed Books
    [Google Scholar]
47. Denzin NK, Giardina MD 2010. Qualitative Inquiry and Human Rights Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast
    [Google Scholar]
48. Diller JM. 1997. Handbook on Human Rights in Situations of Conflict Minneapolis: Minn. Advocates Hum. Rights
    [Google Scholar]
49. Dueck J. 1992. HURIDOCS standard formats as a tool in the documentation of human rights violations. See Jabine & Claude 1992 127–58
50. Dueck J, Guzman M, Verstappen B 2001. HURIDOCS Events Standard Formats: A Tool for Documenting Human Rights Violations Versoix, Switz.: HURIDOCS. , 2nd rev. ed..
    [Google Scholar]
51. Edwards S, Koettl C. 2011. Looking to the sky: monitoring human rights through remote sensing. Harvard Int. Rev. 32:66–71
    [Google Scholar]
52. Evans P, Rodríguez-Garavito C 2018. Transnational Advocacy Networks: Reflecting on Twenty Years of Evolving Theory and Practice Bogota: Dejusticia
    [Google Scholar]
53. Firchow P, MacGinty R. 2017. Measuring peace: comparability, commensurability, and complementarity using bottom-up indicators. Int. Stud. Rev. 19:16–27
    [Google Scholar]
54. Fondebrider L. 2012. The application of forensic anthropology to the investigation of cases of political violence. A Companion to Forensic Anthropology DC Dirkmaat 639–48 Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell
    [Google Scholar]
55. Forsythe DP. 2000. Human Rights in International Relations New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
56. Forsythe DP. 2009. Human rights studies: on the dangers of legalistic assumptions. See Coomans et al. 2009a 59–75
57. Franck TM, Fairley HS. 1980. Procedural due process in human rights fact-finding by international agencies. Am. J. Int. Law 74:2308–45
    [Google Scholar]
58. Freeman M. 2006. Truth Commissions and Procedural Fairness New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
59. Freeman M. 2011. Human Rights: An Interdisciplinary Approach Cambridge, UK: Polity
    [Google Scholar]
60. Fukuda-Parr S, Lawson-Remer T, Randolph S 2009. An index of economic and social rights fulfillment: concept and methodology. J. Hum. Rights 8:195–221
    [Google Scholar]
61. Gastil RD. 1990. The comparative survey of freedom: experiences and suggestions. Stud. Comp. Int. Dev. 25:25–50
    [Google Scholar]
62. Gibney M, Dalton M. 1996. The political terror scale. Human Rights and Developing Countries D Cingranelli Greenwich, CT: JAI
    [Google Scholar]
63. Giffard C. 2002. Torture Reporting Handbook Colchester, UK: Hum. Rights Cent., Univ. Essex
    [Google Scholar]
64. Goldstein R. 1992. The limitations of using quantitative data in studying human rights abuses. See Jabine & Claude 1992 35–61
65. González E, Varney H. 2013. Truth Seeking: Elements of Creating an Effective Truth Commission New York: Int. Cent. Transit. Justice
    [Google Scholar]
66. Grace R, Bruderlein C. 2012. On monitoring, reporting, and fact-finding mechanisms. ESIL Reflect 1:21–5
    [Google Scholar]
67. Gready P. 2009. Telling truth? the methodological challenges of truth commissions. See Coomans et al. 2009a 159–86
68. Groome D. 2011. The Handbook of Human Rights Investigators: A Comprehensive Guide to the Investigation and Documentation of Violent Human Rights Abuses Scotts Valley, CA: CreateSpace
    [Google Scholar]
69. Hafner-Burton EM, Ron J. 2007. Human rights institutions: rhetoric and efficacy. J. Peace Res. 44:4379–84
    [Google Scholar]
70. Hale C 2008. Engaging Contradictions: Theory, Politics, and Methods of Activist Scholarship Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
    [Google Scholar]
71. Harvard Program Humanit. Policy Confl. Res 2015. HPCR Advanced Practitioner's Handbook on Commissions of Inquiry: Monitoring, Reporting, and Fact-Finding Cambridge, MA: Program Humanit. Policy Confl. Res.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Hathaway O. 2002. Do treaties make a difference? Human rights treaties and the problem of compliance. Yale Law J 111:1932–2042
    [Google Scholar]
73. Hayner PB. 2011. Unspeakable Truths: Facing the Challenges of Truth Commissions New York: Routledge. , 2nd ed..
    [Google Scholar]
74. Hertel S, Minkler L. 2007. Economic Rights: Conceptual, Measurement, and Policy Issues. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
75. Howard R. 1990. Monitoring human rights: problems of consistency. Ethics Int. Aff. 4:133–51
    [Google Scholar]
76. Hum. Rights Cent 2012. The Right Toolkit: Applying Research Methods in the Service of Human Rights Berkeley: Hum. Rights Cent., Univ. Calif. Berkeley School of Law
    [Google Scholar]
77. Hum. Rights Counc 2016. Human rights and indigenous peoples: mandate of the Special Rapporteur on the rights of indigenous peoples Oct. 6, UN Doc. A/HRC/Res/33
    [Google Scholar]
78. Hum. Rights Law Cent 2008. Guiding Principles for Human Rights Field Officers Working in Conflict and Post-Conflict Environments Nottingham, UK: Hum. Rights Law Cent., Univ. Nottingham
    [Google Scholar]
79. Hum. Rights Watch 1993. Genocide in Iraq: The Anfal Campaign Against the Kurds New York: Hum. Rights Watch
    [Google Scholar]
80. Hum. Rights Watch 1999. Leave None to Tell the Story: Genocide in Rwanda New York: Hum. Rights Watch
    [Google Scholar]
81. Hum. Rights Watch 2019. About our research. https://www.hrw.org/about-our-research
82. Ignatieff M. 2001. Human Rights as Politics and Idolatry Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
83. Innes JE. 1992. Human rights reporting as a policy tool: an examination of the state department country reports. See Jabine & Claude 1992235–57
84. Int. Bar Assoc., Raoul Wallenberg Inst 2009. Guidelines on International Human Rights Fact-Finding Visits and Reports London: Int. Bar Assoc.
    [Google Scholar]
85. Int. Counc. Hum. Rights Policy 2005. Assessing the Effectiveness of National Human Rights Institutions Geneva: Int. Counc. Hum. Rights Policy
    [Google Scholar]
86. Int. Hum. Rights Law Inst 2008. Chicago Principles on Post-Conflict Justice Chicago: Int. Hum. Rights Law Inst.
    [Google Scholar]
87. Int. Inst. High Stud. Crim. Sci 2013. Siracusa Guidelines for International, Regional and National Fact-Finding Bodies Cambridge, UK: Intersentia
    [Google Scholar]
88. Int. Law Assoc 1981. The Belgrade international rules of procedure for international human rights fact-finding missions. Am. J. Int. Law 75:1163–65
    [Google Scholar]
89. Int. Rescue Comm 2008. Mortality in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: An Ongoing Crisis New York: Int. Rescue Comm.
    [Google Scholar]
90. Jabine TB, Claude RP 1992. Human Rights and Statistics: Getting the Record Straight Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press
    [Google Scholar]
91. Jacobsen FA. 2008. Human Rights Monitoring: A Field Mission Manual Leiden, Neth./Boston: Martinus Nijhoff
    [Google Scholar]
92. Jensen S, Burke R. 2017. From the normative to the transnational: methods in the study of human rights history. See Andreassen et al. 2018a 117–40
93. Keck ME, Sikkink K. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks and International Politics Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
94. Kennedy D. 2001. The international human rights movement: Part of the problem?. Harvard Hum. Rights J. 15:99–126
    [Google Scholar]
95. Khan A, Gopal A. 2017. The uncounted. New York Times Magazine Nov 16
    [Google Scholar]
96. Land MK. 2016. Democratizing human rights fact-finding. See Alston & Knuckey 2016a 399–424
97. Land MK, Aronson J. 2018. New Technologies for Human Rights Law and Practice New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
98. Landman T. 2005. Protecting Human Rights: A Comparative Study Washington, DC: Georgetown Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
99. Landman T. 2006. Studying Human Rights London: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
100. Landman T. 2009. Social science methods and human rights. See Coomans et al. 2009a 19–44
101. Landman T, Carvalho E. 2010. Measuring Human Rights London: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
102. Langford M. 2018. Critiques of human rights. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 14:69–89
     [Google Scholar]
103. Lannon J, Halpin EF 2012. Human Rights and Information Communication Technologies: Trends and Consequences of Use Hershey, PA: IGI Global
     [Google Scholar]
104. LaRose-Edwards P. 2008. Working in the field for the UN and other IGOs: human rights operations. Manual on Human Rights Monitoring: An Introduction for Human Rights Field Officers Oslo: Nor. Cent. Hum. Rights, Univ. Oslo
     [Google Scholar]
105. Leach P, Paraskeva C, Uzelac G 2009. International Human Rights and Fact-Finding: An Analysis of the Fact-Finding Missions Conducted by the European Commission and Court of Human Rights London: Hum. Rights Soc. Justice Res. Inst. Lond. Metrop. Univ.
     [Google Scholar]
106. Lopez G, Stohl M. 1992. Problems of concept and measurement in the study of human rights. See Jabine & Claude 1992, 216–34
107. Mancini F 2013. New Technology and the Prevention of Violence and Conflict New York: Int. Peace Inst.
     [Google Scholar]
108. Martin M, Sosa LV. 2013. An empirical analysis of United Nations commissions of inquiry: toward the development of a standardized methodology. See Int. Inst. High Stud. Crim. Sci. 2013 53–99
109. McConnell L, Smith R. 2018. Research Methods in Human Rights New York: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
110. Mégret F. 2016. Do facts exist, can they be “found,” and does it matter?. See Alston & Knuckey 2016a 27–48
111. Merry SE. 2006. Human Rights and Gender Violence: Translating International Law into Local Justice Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
112. Merry SE. 2016. The Seductions of Quantification: Measuring Human Rights, Gender Violence, and Sex Trafficking Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
113. Moeckli D, Nowak M. 2007. The deployment of human rights field operations: policy, politics and practice. See O'Flaherty 2007a 87–104
114. Moyn S. 2010. The Last Utopia: Human Rights in History Cambridge, MA: Belknap
     [Google Scholar]
115. Moyn S. 2018. Not Enough: Human Rights in an Unequal World Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
116. Mutua M. 2008. Human Rights: A Political and Cultural Critique Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press
     [Google Scholar]
117. Mutua M. 2016. Human Rights Standards: Hegemony, Law, and Politics Albany: State Univ. N. Y. Press
     [Google Scholar]
118. Ní Aoláin F. 2016. The gender politics of fact-finding in the context of the women, peace, and security agenda. See Alston & Knuckey 2016a 89–106
119. Nickel J. 2007. Making Sense of Human Rights Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. , 2nd ed..
     [Google Scholar]
120. O'Flaherty M 2007a. The Human Rights Field Operation: Law, Theory and Practice Burlington, VT: Ashgate
     [Google Scholar]
121. O'Flaherty M 2007b. Human rights field operations: an introductory analysis. See O'Flaherty 2007a 1–30
     [Google Scholar]
122. Off. UN High Comm. Hum. Rights (OHCHR) 2001. Training Manual on Human Rights Monitoring Prof. Train. Ser. No. 7 New York: OHCHR
     [Google Scholar]
123. Off. UN High Comm. Hum. Rights (OHCHR) 2004. Istanbul Protocol: Manual on the Effective Investigation of Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment New York: OHCHR
     [Google Scholar]
124. Off. UN High Comm. Hum. Rights (OHCHR) 2006. Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Truth Commissions New York: OHCHR
     [Google Scholar]
125. Off. UN High Comm. Hum. Rights (OHCHR) 2012. Human Rights Indicators: A Guide to Measurement and Implementation New York: OHCHR
     [Google Scholar]
126. Off. UN High Comm. Hum. Rights (OHCHR) 2015. Commissions of Inquiry and Fact-Finding Missions on International Human Rights and Humanitarian Law: Guidance and Practice New York: OHCHR
     [Google Scholar]
127. Olsen TD, Payne LA, Reiter AG 2010. Transitional Justice in Balance: Comparing Processes, Weighing Efficacy Washington, DC: Inst. Peace
     [Google Scholar]
128. Orentlicher DF. 1990. Bearing witness: the art and science of human rights fact-finding. Harvard Hum. Rights J. 3:83–135
     [Google Scholar]
129. Pillay N. 2010. Human rights investigations and their methodology Lecture, UN High Comm. Human Rights, Feb. 24 http://unispal.un.org/UNISPAL.NSF/0/C9222F058467E6F6852576D500574710
     [Google Scholar]
130. Posner E. 2014. The Twilight of Human Rights Law New York: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
131. Price M, Gohdes A, Ball P 2014. Updated Statistical Analysis of Documentation of Killings in the Syrian Arab Republic San Francisco: Hum. Rights Data Anal. Group
     [Google Scholar]
132. Ramcharan BG 1982. International Law and Fact-Finding in the Field of Human Rights Alphen aan den Rijn, Neth.: Kluwer
     [Google Scholar]
133. Raworth K. 2001. Measuring human rights. Ethics Int. Aff. 15:111–31
     [Google Scholar]
134. Reed K, Padskocimaite A. 2012. The Right Toolkit: Applying Research Methods in the Service of Human Rights Berkeley: Hum. Rights Cent., Univ. Calif. Berkeley
     [Google Scholar]
135. Reiter RB, Zunzunegui MV, Jose Quiroga J 1986. Guidelines for field reporting of basic human rights violations. Hum. Rights Q. 8:4628–53
     [Google Scholar]
136. Ricart LT. 2008. Due process of law in the fact-finding work of the Security Council's panels of experts: an analysis in terms of global administrative law Emerg. Sch. Pap. 8, Inst. Int. Law Justice, N.Y. Univ. School Law New York:
     [Google Scholar]
137. Rodríguez-Garavito C, Gomez K 2018. Rising to the Populist Challenge: A New Playbook for Human Rights Bogota: Dejusticia
     [Google Scholar]
138. Rogin J. 2017. Syrian defector who documented Assad's atrocities returning to Washington. Washington Post March 17
     [Google Scholar]
139. Romeu J. 2008. Statistical thinking and data analysis: enhancing human rights work. See Asher et al. 2008 65–85
140. Root B. 2016. Numbers are only human: lessons for human rights practitioners from the quantitative literacy movement. See Alston & Knuckey 2016a 355–76
141. Rosga A, Satterthwaite ML. 2009. The trust in indicators: measuring human rights. Berkeley J. Int. Law. 27:2253–315
     [Google Scholar]
142. Roth K. 2004. Defending economic, social and cultural rights: practical issues faced by an international human rights organization. Hum. Rights Q. 26:63–73
     [Google Scholar]
143. Rothenberg D 2012. Memory of Silence: The Guatemalan Truth Commission Report New York: Palgrave
     [Google Scholar]
144. Rothenberg D. 2016. The complex truth of testimony: a case study of human rights fact-finding in Iraq. See Alston & Knuckey 2016a 191–212
145. Sanford V. 2003. Buried Secrets: Truth and Human Rights in Guatemala New York: Palgrave
     [Google Scholar]
146. Sano HO, Thelle H. 2009. The need for evidence-based human rights research. See Coomans et al. 2009a 91–109
147. Satterthwaite ML, Simeone JC. 2016. A conceptual roadmap for social science methods in human rights fact-finding. See Alston & Knuckey 2016a 321–54
148. Scarry E. 1985. The Body in Pain: The Making and Unmaking of the World New York: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
149. Schaffer K, Smith S. 2004. Human Rights and Narrated Lives: The Ethics of Recognition New York: Palgrave Macmillan
     [Google Scholar]
150. Skåre S, Burkey I, Mørk H 2008. Manual on Human Rights Monitoring: An Introduction for Human Rights Field Officers Oslo: Nor. Cent. Hum. Rights
     [Google Scholar]
151. Smith R. 2018. Human rights based approaches to research. Research Methods in Human Rights L McConnell, R Smith 6–23 New York: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
152. Snow C, Bihurriet M. 1992. An epidemiology of homicide: Ningún Nombre burials in the province of Buenos Aires from 1970 to 1984. See Jabine & Claude 1992 328–63
153. Steadman DW. 2015. Hard Evidence: Case Studies in Forensic Anthropology London: Routledge. , 2nd ed..
     [Google Scholar]
154. Sunga LS. 2011. How can UN human rights special procedures sharpen ICC fact-finding. Int. J. Hum. Rights 15:2187–205
     [Google Scholar]
155. Thakur R. 1994. Human rights: Amnesty International and the United Nations. J. Peace Res. 31:143–60
     [Google Scholar]
156. Thoolen H, Verstappen B. 1986. Human Rights Missions: A Study of the Fact-Finding Practice of Non-Governmental Organizations Leiden, Neth.: Martinus Nijhoff
     [Google Scholar]
157. Thompson G. 2017. How the U.S. triggered a massacre in Mexico. ProPublica June 12. https://www.propublica.org/article/allende-zetas-cartel-massacre-and-the-us-dea
     [Google Scholar]
158. Transpar. Int 2018. Corruption Perceptions Index 2017 Berlin: Transpar. Int https://www.transparency.org/news/feature/corruption_perceptions_index_2017
     [Google Scholar]
159. UN Dev. Program 2000. Using indicators for human rights accountability. Human Development Report 2000: Human Rights and Human Development89–111 New York: UN Dev. Program
     [Google Scholar]
160. UN Dev. Program 2006a. Guide for Ombudsman Institutions: How to Conduct Investigations Bratislava, Slovak.: UN Dev. Program
     [Google Scholar]
161. UN Dev. Program 2006b. Indicators for Human Rights Based Approaches to Development in UNDP Programming: A User's Guide New York: UN Dev. Program
     [Google Scholar]
162. UN Dev. Program, Off. High Comm. Hum. Rights (OHCHR) 2010. UNDP/OHCHR Toolkit for collaboration with National Human Rights Institutions New York: UN Dev. Program
     [Google Scholar]
163. UN Gen. Assembly 1991. Declaration on Fact-Finding by the United Nations in the Field of the Maintenance of International Peace and Security Dec. 9. GA Res. 46/59
     [Google Scholar]
164. UN Gen. Assembly 1993. Principles Relating to the Status of National Institutions (The Paris Principles) Dec. 20. GA Res. 48/134
     [Google Scholar]
165. UN Gen. Assembly Secur. Counc 2000. Report of the Panel on United Nations Peace Operations (Brahimi Report) Aug. 21. UN Doc. A/55/305/2000/809
     [Google Scholar]
166. Viljoen F. 2004. Fact-finding by UN human rights complaints bodies—analysis and suggested reforms. Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law Vol. 8 A Von Bogdandy, R Wolfrum 49–100 Leiden, Neth.: Brill
     [Google Scholar]
167. Walk Free Found 2018. Global Slavery Index Nedlands, WA: Walk Free Found https://www.globalslaveryindex.org/2018/findings/highlights/
     [Google Scholar]
168. Walker-Said C, Kelly J 2015. Corporate Social Responsibility: Human Rights in the New Global Economy Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
169. Walling CB, Waltz S 2010. Human Rights: From Practice to Policy: Proceedings of a Research Workshop Ann Arbor: Gerald R. Ford School Public Policy, Univ. Mich.
     [Google Scholar]
170. Weissbrodt D, McCarthy J. 1981. Fact-finding by international nongovernmental human rights organizations. Va. J. Int. Law 22:1–89
     [Google Scholar]
171. Wood R, Gibney M. 2010. The political terror scale (PTS): a re-introduction and comparison to CIRI. Hum. Rights Q. 32:2367–400
     [Google Scholar]
172. World Justice Proj 2018. WJP Rule of Law Index 2017–2018 Washington, DC: World Justice Proj. https://worldjusticeproject.org/our-work/wjp-rule-law-index/wjp-rule-law-index-2017%E2%80%932018
     [Google Scholar]