Social Theory and Legal Theory: Contemporary Interactions

Literature Cited

1. Agamben G. 1998. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life transl. D Heller-Roazen Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
   [Google Scholar]
2. Agamben G. 2005. State of Exception transl. K Attell Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
   [Google Scholar]
3. Alexander JC. 1992. Shaky foundations: the presuppositions and internal contradictions of James Coleman's Foundations of Social Theory. Theory Soc 21:203–17
   [Google Scholar]
4. Alexander JC. 2006. The Civil Sphere New York: Oxford Univ. Press
   [Google Scholar]
5. Amelina A, Boatcă M, Bongaerts G, Weiß A. 2020. Theorizing societalization across borders: globality, transnationality, postcoloniality. Curr. Sociol 69:303–14
   [Google Scholar]
6. Austin J. 2005 [1885]. Lectures on Jurisprudence Clark, NJ: Lawbook Exch, 5th ed..
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bartelson J. 2006. The concept of sovereignty revisited. Eur. J. Internatl. Law 17:463–74
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bauman Z. 1989. Modernity and the Holocaust Cambridge, UK: Polity
   [Google Scholar]
9. Bauman Z. 2002. Society under Siege Cambridge, UK: Polity
   [Google Scholar]
10. Beck U, Sznaider N. 2006. Unpacking cosmopolitanism for the social sciences: a research agenda. Br. J. Sociol. 57:1–22
    [Google Scholar]
11. Berman PS. 2012. Global Legal Pluralism: A Jurisprudence of Law Beyond Borders New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
12. Bertilsson TM. 2006. On the accumulation of cosmopolitan capital: a comment on Bourdieu and law. Retfaerd 29:108–15
    [Google Scholar]
13. Besson S. 2009. The authority of international law: lifting the state veil. Syd. Law Rev. 31:343–80
    [Google Scholar]
14. Blalock C. 2014. Neoliberalism and the crisis of legal theory. Law Contemp. Probl. 77:71–104
    [Google Scholar]
15. Bourdieu P. 1987. The force of law: toward a sociology of the juridical field. Hastings Law J 38:814–53
    [Google Scholar]
16. Bredemeier HC 1962. Law as an integrative mechanism. Law and Sociology: Exploratory Essays WM Evan 73–88 New York: Free Press Glencoe
    [Google Scholar]
17. Chernilo D. 2013. The Natural Law Foundations of Modern Social Theory: A Quest for Universalism Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
18. Cole WM. 2012. A civil religion for world society: the direct and diffuse effects of human rights treaties, 1981–2007. Sociol. Forum 27:937–60
    [Google Scholar]
19. Coleman JS. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
20. Coleman JS. 1992. The problematics of social theory: four reviews of Foundations of Social Theory. Theory Soc 21:263–83
    [Google Scholar]
21. Cotterrell R. 1999. Emile Durkheim: Law in a Moral Domain Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
22. Cotterrell R. 2011. Ant's eye-view of law: Bruno Latour at the Conseil D'État. J. Class. Sociol. 11:506–10
    [Google Scholar]
23. Cotterrell R. 2018. Sociological Jurisprudence: Juristic Thought and Social Inquiry New York/Abingdon, UK: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
24. Cotterrell R. 2019. Access to justice, moral distance and changing demands on law. Windsor Yearb. Access Justice 36:193–209
    [Google Scholar]
25. Crenshaw K. 1989. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: a black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. Univ. Chicago Leg. Forum 1989:139–67
    [Google Scholar]
26. Deflem M 2013. The legal theory of Jürgen Habermas: between the philosophy and the sociology of law. Law and Social Theory R Banakar, M Travers 75–90 Oxford, UK: Hart
    [Google Scholar]
27. Di Robilant A. 2006. Genealogies of soft law. Am. J. Comp. Law 54:499–554
    [Google Scholar]
28. Djelic M-L, Quack S 2010. Transnational Communities: Shaping Global Economic Governance Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
29. Ehrlich E. 2002 (1936. Fundamental Principles of the Sociology of Law transl. WL Moll New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction
    [Google Scholar]
30. Elliott A, Turner BS 2001. Profiles in Contemporary Social Theory London: Sage
    [Google Scholar]
31. Fauconnet P. 2010 (1928. La responsabilité: Étude de sociologie Paris: Corpus Oeuvres Philos. Lang. Fr.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Febbrajo A, Harste G 2013. Law and Intersystemic Communication: Understanding “Structural Coupling.” Farnham, UK: Ashgate
    [Google Scholar]
33. Féron H. 2014. Human rights and faith: a “world-wide secular religion”?. Ethics Glob. Politics 7:181–200
    [Google Scholar]
34. Foucault M. 1990 (1978. The History of Sexuality 1 An Introduction transl. R Hurley London: Penguin
    [Google Scholar]
35. Foucault M 1991 (1979. Governmentality. The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality G Burchell, C Gordon, P Miller 87–104 London: Harvest. Wheatsheaf
    [Google Scholar]
36. Fuller LL. 1969. The Morality of Law New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press, Rev. ed..
    [Google Scholar]
37. Gabel P. 1984. The phenomenology of rights consciousness and the pact of the withdrawn selves. Tex. Law Rev. 62:1563–99
    [Google Scholar]
38. Gardner J. 2001. Legal positivism: 5½ myths. Am. J. Jurisprud. 46:199–227
    [Google Scholar]
39. Grewal DS, Purdy J. 2014. Introduction: law and neoliberalism. Law Contemp. Probl. 77:1–23
    [Google Scholar]
40. Habermas J 1986. Law as medium and law as institution. Dilemmas of Law in the Welfare State G Teubner 203–20 Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter
    [Google Scholar]
41. Habermas J. 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy transl., W Rehg Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
    [Google Scholar]
42. Halliday S. 2019. After hegemony: the varieties of legal consciousness research. Soc. Leg. Stud. 28:859–78
    [Google Scholar]
43. Hallis F. 1978 (1930. Corporate Personality: A Study in Jurisprudence Aalen, Ger: Sci. Verlag
    [Google Scholar]
44. Hardt M, Negri A. 2000. Empire Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
45. Hart HLA. 1994. The Concept of Law Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press, 2nd ed.. with postscript
    [Google Scholar]
46. Herzog D. 2020. Sovereignty RIP New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
47. Hitlin S, Vaisey S 2010. Handbook of the Sociology of Morality New York: Springer
    [Google Scholar]
48. Hunt A. 1992. Foucault's expulsion of law: toward a retrieval. Law Soc. Inq. 17:1–38
    [Google Scholar]
49. Kelley DR. 1990. The Human Measure: Social Thought in the Western Legal Tradition Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
50. King M, Schütz A. 1994. The ambitious modesty of Niklas Luhmann. J. Law Soc. 21:261–87
    [Google Scholar]
51. Kingsbury B. 2009. The concept of “law” in global administrative law. Eur. J. Internatl. Law 20:23–57
    [Google Scholar]
52. Latour B. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
53. Latour B. 2010. The Making of Law: An Ethnography of the Conseil d'État transl. M Brilman, A Pottage Cambridge, UK: Polity
    [Google Scholar]
54. Leiter B. 2004. The end of empire: Dworkin and jurisprudence in the 21st century. Rutgers Law J 36:165–81
    [Google Scholar]
55. Levi R, Valverde M. 2008. Studying law by association: Bruno Latour goes to the Conseil d'État. Law Soc. Inq. 33:805–25
    [Google Scholar]
56. Loughlin M, Tierney S 2018. The shibboleth of sovereignty. Mod. Law Rev. 81:989–1016
    [Google Scholar]
57. Luhmann N. 1982. The world society as a social system. Internatl. J. Gen. Syst. 8:131–38
    [Google Scholar]
58. Lundstedt AV. 1956. Legal Thinking Revised: My Views on Law Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell
    [Google Scholar]
59. Marsden PV. 2005. The sociology of James S. Coleman. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 31:1–24
    [Google Scholar]
60. Merry SE. 1988. Legal pluralism. Law Soc. Rev. 22:869–96
    [Google Scholar]
61. Michaels R. 2020. Global legal pluralism and conflict of laws. Oxford Handbook of Global Legal Pluralism PS Berman 629–48 New York: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
62. Mutua A. 2008. Introducing ClassCrits: from class blindness to a critical legal analysis of economic inequality. Buffalo Law Rev 56:859–913
    [Google Scholar]
63. Nelken D 2007. Defining and using the concept of legal culture. Comparative Law: A Handbook E Örücü, D Nelken 109–32 Oxford, UK: Hart
    [Google Scholar]
64. Nelken D 2015. The changing roles of social indicators: from explanation to governance. Globalisation, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice V Mitsilegas, P Alldridge, L Cheliotis 25–43 Oxford, UK: Hart
    [Google Scholar]
65. Ost F, Van de Kerchove M. 2002. De la pyramide au réseau? Pour une théorie dialectique du droit Brussels: Publ. Fac. Univ. Saint-Louis
    [Google Scholar]
66. Parsons T. 1977. The Evolution of Societies Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
    [Google Scholar]
67. Pound R. 2002 (1958. The Ideal Element in Law Indianapolis: Liberty Fund
    [Google Scholar]
68. Raz J. 2009. The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press, 2nd ed..
    [Google Scholar]
69. Roughan N, Halpin A 2017. In Pursuit of Pluralist Jurisprudence Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
70. Samuel G. 2009. Interdisciplinarity and the authority paradigm: Should law be taken seriously by scientists and social scientists?. J. Law Soc. 36:431–59
    [Google Scholar]
71. Scheppele KL. 1994. Legal theory and social theory. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 20:383–406
    [Google Scholar]
72. Selznick P. 1961. Sociology and natural law. Nat. Law Forum 6:84–108
    [Google Scholar]
73. Sweet AS. 2009. Constitutionalism, legal pluralism, and international regimes. Indiana J. Glob. Leg. Stud. 16:621–45
    [Google Scholar]
74. Tadros V. 1998. Between governance and discipline: the law and Michel Foucault. Oxford J. Leg. Stud. 18:75–103
    [Google Scholar]
75. Teubner G. 2012. Constitutional Fragments: Societal Constitutionalism and Globalization Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
76. Timasheff NS. 1974 (1939. An Introduction to the Sociology of Law Westport, CT: Greenwood
    [Google Scholar]
77. Turner SP, Factor RA. 1994. Max Weber: The Lawyer as Social Thinker London: Routledge:
    [Google Scholar]
78. Van Zandt DE. 1989. The relevance of social theory to legal theory. Northwest. Univ. Law Rev. 83:10–37
    [Google Scholar]
79. Weber M. 1985 (1930. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism transl. T Parsons London: Unwin
    [Google Scholar]
80. Wickham G 2013. Foucault and law. Law and Social Theory R Banakar, M Travers 217–32 Oxford, UK: Hart, 2nd ed..
    [Google Scholar]
81. Williams PJ. 1991. The Alchemy of Race and Rights Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]