1932

Abstract

This review examines recent scholarship on the rise of international human rights law and proposes that social movements have played critical roles both in elevating the standards of human rights in international law and in leveraging these standards into better local practices. Institutionalization of universal human rights principles began in the immediate post–World War II period, in which civil society actors worked with powerful states to establish human rights as a key guiding principle of the international community and to ensure the actors' continuing participation in international human rights institutions. The subsequent decades saw various hurdles arise in international politics, but civil society actors skillfully used the small openings that they had gained to continue to advance the cause of human rights. They held powerful governments accountable to their lofty promises about human rights and worked with sympathetic governments in the UN system to continuously upgrade the standards of international human rights. They also leveraged human rights laws toward better local practices, taking advantage of new political opportunities created by human rights laws, using expanding international channels to increase flows of human and material resources, embracing globally legitimated vocabularies of human rights to frame their movements, and integrating the broad cultural effects of human rights laws to construct new social movement identity and actorhood. The review then points out some potential pitfalls of international human rights laws: professionalization of movement actors, which can undermine the impact of social movements and lead to less ambitious and transformative goals; privileging of some causes over others, which can lead to demobilization around certain issues; and overextending movement goals, which can give rise to strong backlash against human rights principles.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102811-173849
2012-12-01
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/lawsocsci/8/1/annurev-lawsocsci-102811-173849.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102811-173849&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Allen RG, Cherniack M, Andreopoulos GJ. 1996. Refining war: civil wars and humanitarian controls. Hum. Rights Q. 18:747–81 [Google Scholar]
  2. Anaya J. 2004. Indigenous Peoples in International Law New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  3. Anderson C. 2003. Eyes off the Prize: the United Nations and the African American Struggle for Human Rights, 1944–1955 New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  4. Armstrong EA. 2002. Forging Gay Identities: Organizing Sexuality in San Francisco, 1950–1994 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  5. Barelli M. 2010. The interplay between global and regional human rights systems in the construction of the indigenous rights regime. Hum. Rights Q. 32:951–79 [Google Scholar]
  6. Barsh RL. 1996. Indigenous peoples and the UN Commission on Human Rights: a case of the immovable object and the irresistible force. Hum. Rights Q. 18:782–813 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bartley T. 2007. Institutional emergence in an era of globalization: the rise of transnational private regulation of labor and environmental conditions. Am. J. Sociol. 113:297–351 [Google Scholar]
  8. Basok T, Carasco E. 2010. Advancing rights of non-citizens in Canada: a human rights approach to migrant rights. Hum. Rights Q. 32:2342–66 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bass GJ. 2010. The old new thing. The New Repub. Oct. 20. http://www.tnr.com/article/books-and-arts/magazine/78542/the-old-new-thing-human-rights?page=0,0
  10. Baxi U. 2002. The Future of Human Rights Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  11. Beckfield J. 2003. Inequality in the world polity: the structure of international organization. Am. Sociol. Rev. 68:401–24 [Google Scholar]
  12. Benford R, Snow D. 2000. Framing processes and social movements: an overview and assessment. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 26:611–39 [Google Scholar]
  13. Bird K. 1998. The Color of Truth: McGeorge Bundy and William Bundy: Brothers in Arms New York: Simon & Schuster
  14. Bissell RE. 1977. Apartheid and International Organizations Boulder, CO: Westview
  15. Black A. 2012. Are women “human”?. See Iriye et al. 2012 133–55
  16. Bob C. 2001. Marketing rebellion: insurgent groups, international media, and NGO support. Int. Polit. 38:311–34 [Google Scholar]
  17. Bob C. 2005. The Marketing of Rebellion: Insurgents, Media, and International Activism New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  18. Bonner MD. 2005. Defining rights in democratization: the Argentine government and human rights organizations, 1983–2003. Latin Am. Polit. Soc. 47:455–76 [Google Scholar]
  19. Borgwardt E. 2005. A New Deal for the World: How Human Rights Ideas Reshaped the National Interest Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  20. Borgwardt E. 2008. A new deal for the Nuremberg Trial: the limits of law in generating human rights norms. Law Hist. Rev. 26:679–705 [Google Scholar]
  21. Borgwardt E. 2012. Race, rights, and nongovernmental organizations at the UN San Francisco Conference: a contested history of “Human rights…without discrimination.”. Fog of War: The Second World War and the Civil Rights Movement KM Kruse, S Tuck 188–207 New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  22. Boyle EH. 2002. Female Genital Cutting: Cultural Conflict in the Global Community Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press
  23. Boyle EH, Thompson M. 2001. National politics and resort to the European Commission on Human Rights. Law Soc. Rev. 35:321–44 [Google Scholar]
  24. Breen C. 2003. The role of NGOs in the formulation of and compliance with the optional protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on involvement of children in armed conflict. Hum. Rights Q. 25:453–81 [Google Scholar]
  25. Brody R, González F. 1997. Nunca más: an analysis of international instruments on “disappearances.”. Hum. Rights Q. 19:365–405 [Google Scholar]
  26. Brown-Nagin T. 2005. Elites, social movements, and the law: the case of affirmative action. Columbia Law Rev. 105:1436–528 [Google Scholar]
  27. Brysk A. 1994. From above and below. Social movements, the international system, and human rights in Argentina. Comp. Polit. Stud. 26:256–85 [Google Scholar]
  28. Brysk A. 2000. From Tribal Village to Global Village: Indian Rights and International Relations in Latin America Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
  29. Brysk A. 2002. Globalization and Human Rights Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  30. Buergenthal T. 1997. The normative and institutional evolution of international human rights. Hum. Rights Q. 19:703–23 [Google Scholar]
  31. Buergenthal T, Shelton D, Stewart DP. 2009. International Human Rights in a Nutshell St. Paul, MN: West
  32. Burke R. 2010. Decolonization and the Evolution of International Human Rights Philadelphia: Univ. Penn. Press
  33. Carmichael WD. 2001. The role of the Ford Foundation. NGOs and Human Rights: Promise and Performance CE Welch 349–60 Philadelphia: Univ. Penn. Press [Google Scholar]
  34. Cerna CM. 2004. The inter-American system for the protection of human rights. Fla. J. Int. Law 16:195–212 [Google Scholar]
  35. Chan KL. 2000. Unraveling the dynamics of spousal abuse through the narrative accounts of Chinese male batterers PhD thesis. Univ. Hong Kong:
  36. Charnovitz S. 1997. Two centuries of participation: NGOs and international governance. Mich. J. Int. Law 18:183–286 [Google Scholar]
  37. Cholewinski R, de Guchteneire P, Pécoud A. 2010. Migration and Human Rights: The United Nations Convention on Migrant Workers' Rights Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  38. Cichowski RA. 2001. Judicial rulemaking and the institutionalization of the European Union sex policy. The Institutionalization of Europe A Sweet, N Fligstein, W Sandholz 113–36 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  39. Clark AM. 2001. Diplomacy of Conscience: Amnesty International and Changing Human Rights Norms Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  40. Clark AM, Friedman EJ, Hochstetler K. 1998. The sovereign limits of global civil society: a comparison of NGO participation in UN world conferences on the environment, human rights, and women. World Polit. 511–35
  41. Clark RS. 1999. Human rights strategies of the 1960s within the United Nations: a tribute to the late Kamleshwar Das. Hum. Rights Q. 21:308–41 [Google Scholar]
  42. Cohen GD. 2012. The Holocaust and the “human rights revolution”. See Iriye et al. 53–72
  43. Cole WM. 2005. Sovereignty relinquished? Explaining commitment to the International Human Rights Covenants, 1966–1999. Am. Sociol. Rev. 70:472–95 [Google Scholar]
  44. Cole WM. 2011. Individuals v. states: the correlates of Human Rights Committee rulings, 1979–2007. Soc. Sci. Res. 40:985–1000 [Google Scholar]
  45. Cole WM. 2012a. Human rights as myth and ceremony?: Reevaluating the effectiveness of human rights treaties, 1981–2007. Am. J. Sociol. 117:1131–71 [Google Scholar]
  46. Cole WM. 2012b. Institutionalizing shame: the effect of Human Rights Committee rulings on abuse, 1981–2007. Soc. Sci. Res. 41:539–54 [Google Scholar]
  47. Cooley A, Ron J. 2002. The NGO scramble: organizational insecurity and the political economy of transnational action. Int. Secur. 27:5–39 [Google Scholar]
  48. Cooper J. 2003. Persistent resistance: UN and the nonviolent campaign for the human rights of indigenous peoples. Soc. Altern. 22:17–22 [Google Scholar]
  49. Corntassel J. 2007. Partnership in action? Indigenous political mobilization and co-optation during the First UN Indigenous Decade, 1995–2004. Hum. Rights Q. 29:1137–66 [Google Scholar]
  50. Corntassel J, Primeau TH. 1995. Indigenous “sovereignty” and international law: revised strategies for pursuing “self-determination.”. Hum. Rights Q. 17:343–65 [Google Scholar]
  51. Cornwall A, Nyamu-Musembi C. 2004. Putting the ‘rights-based approach’ to development into perspective. Third World Q. 25:1415–37 [Google Scholar]
  52. Correa S, Petchesky R, Parker R. 2008. Sexuality, Health, and Human Rights New York: Routlege
  53. Cowan JK, Dembour M-B, Wilson RA. 2001. Culture and Rights: an Anthropological Perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  54. Coy PG. 1997. Cooperative accompaniment and Peace Brigades International in Sri Lanka. See Smith et al. 1997 81–100
  55. De Albuquerque C. 2010. Chronicle of an announced birth: the coming into life of the optional protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights—the missing piece of the International Bill of Human Rights. Hum. Rights Q. 32:144–78 [Google Scholar]
  56. De Feyter K, Parmentier S, Timmerman C, Ulrich G. 2011. The Local Relevance of Human Rights Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  57. de Sousa Santos B. 2002. Toward a New Common Sense. London: Butterworths
  58. de Sousa Santos B, Rodríguez-Garavito CA. 2005. Law and Globalization from Below: Towards a Cosmopolitan Legality Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  59. della Porta D, Kriesi H. 1999. Social movements in a globalizing world: an introduction. See della Porta et al. 1999 3–22
  60. della Porta D, Kriesi H, Rucht D. 1999. Social Movements in a Globalizing World New York: St. Martin's Press
  61. della Porta D, Tarrow S. 2004. Transnational Protest and Global Activism Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield
  62. Dezalay Y, Garth B. 2001. Constructing law out of power: investing in human rights as an alternative strategy. See Sarat & Scheingold 2001 354–81
  63. Dezalay Y, Garth B. 2006. From the Cold War to Kosovo: the rise and renewal of the field of international human rights. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 2:231–55 [Google Scholar]
  64. Donnelly J, Whelan DJ. 2007. The West, economic and social rights, and the global human rights regime: setting the record straight. Hum. Rights Q. 29:908–49 [Google Scholar]
  65. Douglas DA, Ferguson J-P, Klett E. 2004. An effective confluence of forces in support of worker's rights: ILO standards, US trade laws, unions, and NGOs. Hum. Rights Q. 26:2273–99 [Google Scholar]
  66. Dudziak M. 2002. Cold War Civil Rights: Race and the Image of American Democracy Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  67. Edelman LB, Leachman G, McAdam D. 2010. On law, organizations, and social movements. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 6:653–85 [Google Scholar]
  68. Eide A. 1986. The human rights movement and the transformation of the international order. Alternatives 11:367–402 [Google Scholar]
  69. Elliott MA, Boli J. 2008. Human rights instruments and human rights institutionalization, 1863–2003 Presented at 38th World Congr. Int. Inst. Sociol. Budapest:
  70. Engel DM, Munger FW. 2003. Rights of Inclusion: Law and Identity in the Life Stories of Americans with Disabilities Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  71. Engle K. 2001. From skepticism to embrace: human rights and the American Anthropological Association from 1947–1999. Hum. Rights Q. 23:536–59 [Google Scholar]
  72. Evans T. 2000. Citizenship and human rights in the age of globalization. Alternatives 25:415–38 [Google Scholar]
  73. Farrior S. 2009. Human rights advocacy on gender issues: challenges and opportunities. J. Hum. Rights Pract. 1:183–100 [Google Scholar]
  74. Fisher DR, Green JF. 2004. Understanding disenfranchisement: civil society and developing countries' influence and participation in global governance for sustainable development. Glob. Environ. Polit. 4:65–84 [Google Scholar]
  75. Frank D, Camp BJ, Boutcher SA. 2010. Worldwide trends in the criminal regulation of sex, 1945 to 2005. Am. Sociol. Rev. 75:867–93 [Google Scholar]
  76. Fraser AS. 1999. Becoming human: the origins and development of women's human rights. Hum. Rights Q. 21:853–906 [Google Scholar]
  77. Frost LE. 1992. The evolution of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights: reflections of present and former judges. Hum. Rights Q. 14:2171–205 [Google Scholar]
  78. Gamson WA. 1991. Commitment and agency in social movements. Sociol. Forum 6:127–50 [Google Scholar]
  79. Gassama IJ. 1996. Reaffirming faith in the dignity of each human being: the United Nations, NGOs, and apartheid. Fordham Int. Law J. 19:1464–541 [Google Scholar]
  80. Glendon MA. 2001. A World Made New: Eleanor Roosevelt and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights New York: Random House
  81. Goodale M. 2009. Human Rights: An Anthropological Reader Chichester, UK: Wiley- Blackwell
  82. Goodale M, Merry SE. 2007. The Practice of Human Rights: Tracking Law Between the Global and the Local New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  83. Goodman R, Jinks D. 2004. How to influence states: socialization and international human rights law. Duke Law J. 54:621–703 [Google Scholar]
  84. Gordan N, Berkovitch N. 2007. Human rights discourse in domestic settings: How does it emerge?. Polit. Stud. 55:243–66 [Google Scholar]
  85. Gould R. 1991. Multiple networks and mobilization in the Paris Commune, 1871. Am. Sociol. Rev. 56:716–29 [Google Scholar]
  86. Guidry JA, Kennedy MD, Zald MN. 2000. Globalizations and Social Movements: Culture, Power, and the Transnational Public Sphere Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press
  87. Guilhot N. 2005. The Democracy Makers: Human Rights and International Order New York: Columbia Univ. Press
  88. Hafner-Burton EM. 2008. Sticks and stones: naming and shaming the human rights enforcement problem. Int. Organ. 62:4689–716 [Google Scholar]
  89. Hafner-Burton EM. 2009. Forced to Be Good: Why Trade Agreements Boost Human Rights Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
  90. Hafner-Burton EM. 2012. International regimes for human rights. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 15:265–86 [Google Scholar]
  91. Hafner-Burton EM, Tsutsui K. 2005. Human rights in a globalizing world: the paradox of empty promises. Am. J. Sociol. 110:1373–411 [Google Scholar]
  92. Hafner-Burton EM, Tsutsui K. 2007. Justice lost! The failure of international human rights law. J. Peace Res 44:407–25 [Google Scholar]
  93. Hafner-Burton EM, Tsutsui K, Meyer JW. 2008. International human rights law and the politics of legitimation: repressive states and human rights treaties. Int. Sociol. 23:1115–41 [Google Scholar]
  94. Hagan J. 2003. Justice in the Balkans: Prosecuting War Crimes in the Hague Tribunal Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  95. Hajjar L. 2001. From the fight for legal rights to the promotion of human rights: Israeli and Palestinian cause lawyers in the trenches of globalization. See Sarat & Scheingold 2001 68–95
  96. Hajjar L. 2004. Human rights. The Blackwell Companion to Law and Society A Sarat 589–604 Malden, MA: Blackwell [Google Scholar]
  97. Halliday TC. 2009. Recursivity of global normmaking: a sociological agenda. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 5:263–89 [Google Scholar]
  98. Halliday TC, Osinsky P. 2006. The globalization of law. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 32:447–70 [Google Scholar]
  99. Hathaway OA. 2002. Do human rights treaties make a difference?. Yale Law J. 111:1935–2042 [Google Scholar]
  100. Hertel S. 2006. Unexpected Power: Conflict and Change among Transnational Activists Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
  101. Hitchcock WI. 2012. Human rights and the laws of war. See Iriye et al. 2012 93–112
  102. Hoffman SL. 2011. Introduction: genealogies of human rights. Human Rights in the Twentieth Century SL Hoffmann 1–26 New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  103. Hoskyns C. 1996. Integrating Gender: Women, Law and Politics in the European Union London: Verso
  104. Ignatieff M. 2005. American Exceptionalism and Human Rights Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  105. Iida K. 2004. Human rights and sexual abuse: the impact of international human rights law on Japan. Hum. Rights Q. 26:2428–53 [Google Scholar]
  106. Inclan M. 2009. Sliding doors of opportunity: Zapatistas and their cycle of protest. Mobilization 14:185–106 [Google Scholar]
  107. Iriye A, Goedde P, Hitchcock WI. 2012. The Human Rights Revolution: An International History. New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  108. Ishay MR. 2004. The History of Human Rights: From Ancient Times to the Globalization Era Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  109. Iwasawa Y. 1998. International Law, Human Rights, and Japanese Law: The Impact of International Law on Japanese Law New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  110. James S. 2007. Universal Human Rights: Origins and Development New York: LFB Sch.
  111. Jetschke A. 1999. Linking the unlinkable? International norms and nationalism in Indonesia and the Philippines. See Risse et al. 1999 134–71
  112. Joachim J. 2003. Framing issues and seizing opportunities: the UN, NGOs, and women's rights. Int. Stud. Q. 47:247–74 [Google Scholar]
  113. Johnstone RL. 2006. Feminist influences on the United Nations human rights treaty bodies. Hum. Rights Q. 28:148–85 [Google Scholar]
  114. Kaldor M. 2003. The idea of global civil society. Int. Aff. 79:583–93 [Google Scholar]
  115. Kaul H. 2005. Construction site for more justice: the International Criminal Court after two years. Am. J. Int. Law 99:370–84 [Google Scholar]
  116. Kay T. 2005. Labor transnationalism and global governance: the impact of NAFTA on transnational labor relationships in North America. Am. J. Sociol. 111:715–56 [Google Scholar]
  117. Keck M, Sikkink K. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
  118. Keith L. 1999. The United Nations International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: Does it make a difference in human rights behavior?. J. Peace Res. 36:95–118 [Google Scholar]
  119. Kennedy D. 2002. The international human rights movement: part of the problem?. Harvard Hum. Rights J. 15:99–123 [Google Scholar]
  120. Keys B. 2012. Anti-torture politics. See Iriye et al. 2012 201–22
  121. Khagram S, Riker JV, Sikkink K. 2002. Restructuring World Politics: Transnational Social Movements, Networks, and Norms Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press
  122. Klotz A. 1995. Norms in International Relations: The Struggle Against Apartheid Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
  123. Klug H. 2005. Transnational human rights: exploring the persistence and globalization of human rights. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 1:85–103 [Google Scholar]
  124. Koenig M. 2008. Institutional change in the world polity: international human rights and the construction of collective identities. Int. Sociol. 23:95–114 [Google Scholar]
  125. Koenig M, Dierkes J. 2011. Conflict in the world polity: neo-institutional perspectives. Acta Sociol. 54:15–25 [Google Scholar]
  126. Kollman K, Waites M. 2009. The global politics of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender human rights: an introduction. Contemp. Polit. 15:11–17 [Google Scholar]
  127. Korey W. 2001. NGOs and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights: “A Curious Grapevine.” New York: Palgrave
  128. Kriesi H. 1996. The organizational structure of new social movements in a political context. Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings D McAdam, JD McCarthy, MN Zald 152–84 New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  129. Kuper L. 1994. Theoretical issues relating to genocide: uses and abuses. Genocide: Conceptual and Historical Dimensions G Andreopoulos 31–46 Philadelphia: Univ. Penn. Press [Google Scholar]
  130. Lahusen C. 1999. International campaigns in context: collective action between the local and the global. See della Porta et al. 1999 189–205
  131. Lansner TR. 2006. No empty vessel: media roles in human rights. Non-State Actors in the Human Rights Universe G Andreopoulos, Z Kabasakal Arat, P Juviler 249–72 Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian [Google Scholar]
  132. Lauren PG. 2003. The Evolution of International Human Rights Philadelphia: Univ. Penn. Press
  133. Layton AS. 2000. International Politics and Civil Rights Policies in the United States, 1941–1960 New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  134. Lebovic JH, Voeten E. 2006. The politics of shame: the condemnation of country human rights practices in the UNCHR. Int. Stud. Q. 50:861–88 [Google Scholar]
  135. Levitsky SR. 2006. To lead with law: reassessing the influence of legal advocacy organizations in social movements. See Sarat & Scheingold 2006 145–63
  136. Levitt P, Merry SE. 2009. Vernacularization on the ground: local uses of global women's rights in Peru, China, India, and the United States. Glob. Netw. 9:4441–61 [Google Scholar]
  137. Lim A, Tsutsui T. 2012. Globalization and commitment in corporate social responsibility: cross-national analyses of institutional and political-economy effects. Am. Sociol. Rev. 77:69–98 [Google Scholar]
  138. Liu D. 2006. When do national movements adopt or reject international agendas? A comparative analysis of the Chinese and Indian women's movements. Am. Sociol. Rev. 71:921–42 [Google Scholar]
  139. Luna Z. 2010. Marching toward reproductive justice: coalitional (re) framing of the march for women's lives. Sociol. Inq. 80:4554–78 [Google Scholar]
  140. Lutz E, Sikkink K. 2002. International human rights law and practice in Latin America. Int. Organ. 54:3633–59 [Google Scholar]
  141. Mack K. 2005. Rethinking civil rights lawyering and politics in the era before Brown. Yale Law J. 115:256–354 [Google Scholar]
  142. Martens K. 2004. An appraisal of Amnesty International's work at the United Nations: established areas of activities and shifting priorities since the 1990s. Hum. Rights Q. 26:1050–70 [Google Scholar]
  143. Maul DR. 2011. The International Labour Organization and the globalization of human rights, 1944–1970. Human Rights in the Twentieth Century SL Hoffmann 301–20 New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  144. Mazower M. 2009. No Enchanted Palace: The End of Empire and the Ideological Origins of the United Nations Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  145. McAdam D. 1996. Conceptual origins, current problems, future directions. Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings D McAdam, JD McCarthy, M Zald 23–40 New York: Cambridge Univ. Press: [Google Scholar]
  146. McAdam D. 1999. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 2nd ed..
  147. McAdam D, Paulsen R. 1993. Specifying the relationship between social ties and activism. Am. J. Sociol. 99:640–67 [Google Scholar]
  148. McAdam D, Tarrow S, Tilly C. 2001. Dynamics of Contention New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  149. McCann M. 1994. Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  150. McCann M. 2006. Law and social movements: contemporary perspectives. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 2:17–38 [Google Scholar]
  151. McGoldrick D. 1991. The Human Rights Committee: Its Role in the Development of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  152. Medina C. 1990. The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights: reflections on a joint venture. Hum. Rights Q. 12:439–464 [Google Scholar]
  153. Meili S. 2001. Latin American cause-lawyering networks. See Sarat & Scheingold 2001 307–33
  154. Merry SE. 2006a. Human Rights and Gender Violence: Translating International Law into Local Justice Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  155. Merry SE. 2006b. Transnational human rights and local activism. Am. Anthropol. 108:138–51 [Google Scholar]
  156. Merry SE, Levit P, Rosen MS, Yoon DH. 2010. Law from below: women's human rights and social movements in New York City. Law Soc. Rev. 44:1101–28 [Google Scholar]
  157. Merry SE, Stern RE. 2005. The female inheritance movement in Hong Kong: theorizing the local global interface. Curr. Anthropol. 46:3387–408 [Google Scholar]
  158. Meyer DS, Tarrow S. 1998. A movement society: contentious politics for a new century. The Social Movement Society: Contentious Politics for a New Century DS Meyer, S Tarrow 1–28 Boulder, CO: Rowman & Littlefield [Google Scholar]
  159. Meyer JW. 2012. World society, institutional theories, and the actor. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 36:1–20 [Google Scholar]
  160. Meyer JW, Boli J, Thomas G, Ramirez FO. 1997. World society and the nation-state. Am. J. Sociol. 103:144–81 [Google Scholar]
  161. Minkoff D. 1999. Bending with the wind: strategic change and adaptation by women's and racial minority organizations. Am. J. Sociol. 104:1666–703 [Google Scholar]
  162. Moravcsik A. 2000. The origins of human rights regimes: democratic delegation in postwar Europe. Int. Organ. 54:217–52 [Google Scholar]
  163. Morsink J. 1999. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Origins, Drafting, and Intent Philadelphia: Univ. Penn. Press
  164. Moyen S. 2010. The Last Utopia: Human Rights in History Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press
  165. Munck R. 2006. Global civil society: royal road or slippery path?. Voluntas 17:325–32 [Google Scholar]
  166. Murdie A. 2009. The impact of human rights INGOs on human rights practices. Int. NGO J. 4:421–40 [Google Scholar]
  167. Mutua M. 1996. The ideology of human rights. Va. J. Int. Law 36:589–657 [Google Scholar]
  168. Mutua M. 2002. Human Rights: A Political and Cultural Critique Philadelphia: Univ. Penn. Press
  169. Mutua M. 2007. Standard setting in human rights: critique and prognosis. Hum. Rights Q. 29:547–630 [Google Scholar]
  170. Mutua M. 2009. Human Rights NGOs in East Africa: Political and Normative Tensions Philadelphia: Univ. Penn. Press
  171. Nader L. 2007. The role of NGOs in the UN Human Rights Council. Sur: Int. J. Hum. Rights 7:47–27 [Google Scholar]
  172. Nanda VP. 1998. The establishment of a permanent international criminal court: challenges ahead. Hum. Rights Q. 20:413–28 [Google Scholar]
  173. Nesbitt FN. 2004. Race for Sanctions: African Americans against Apartheid, 1946–1994 Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press
  174. Niezen R. 2000. Recognizing indigenism: Canadian unity and the international movement of indigenous peoples. Comp. Stud. Soc. Hist. 42:119–48 [Google Scholar]
  175. Nurser J. 2003. The “ecumenical movement” churches, “global order,” and human rights: 1938–1948. Hum. Rights Q. 25:841–81 [Google Scholar]
  176. Okafor OC. 2006. Legitimizing Human Rights NGOs: Lessons From Nigeria Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press
  177. Orentlicher D. 1999. Genocide. Crimes of War: What the Public Should Know R Gutman, D Rieff 153–57 New York: W.W. Norton [Google Scholar]
  178. Otto D. 1996. Nongovernmental organizations in the United Nations system: the emerging role of international civil society. Hum. Rights Q. 18:107–41 [Google Scholar]
  179. Pécoud A, de Guchteneire P. 2006. Migration, human rights, and the United Nations: an investigation into the obstacles to the UN Convention on Migrant Workers' Rights. Windsor Yearb. Access Justice 24:241–66 [Google Scholar]
  180. Petrasek D. 2011. The indivisibility of rights and the affirmation of ESC rights. See Walling & Waltz 2011 13–25
  181. Piven FF, Cloward R. 1978. Poor People's Movements: Why They Succeed, How They Fail New York: Vintage Books
  182. Power S. 2002. A Problem from Hell: America and the Age of Genocide New York: Harper Perennial
  183. Purkayastha B, Subramaniam M. 2004. The Power of Women's Informal Networks: Lessons in Social Change from South Asia and West Africa Lanham, MD: Lexington
  184. Quataert JH. 2009. Advocating Dignity: Human Rights Mobilizations in Global Politics Philadelphia: Univ. Penn. Press
  185. Rajagopal B. 2003. International Law from Below: Development, Social Movements, and Third World Resistance Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  186. Rajagopal B. 2005. The role of law in counter-hegemonic globalization and global legal pluralism: lessons from the Narmada Valley struggle in India. Leiden J. Int. Law 18:3345–87 [Google Scholar]
  187. Rajagopal B. 2009. The international human rights movement today. Md. J. Int. Law 24:56–62 [Google Scholar]
  188. Ramirez F, Soysal Y, Shanahan S. 1997. The changing logic of political citizenship. Cross-national acquisition of women's suffrage rights, 1890 to 1990. Am. Sociol. Rev. 62:735–45 [Google Scholar]
  189. Reimann KD. 2006. A view from the top: international politics, norms and the worldwide growth of NGOs Polit. Sci. Fac. Publ. Pap. 4, Georgia State Univ. http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/political_science_facpub/4
  190. Riles A. 2001. The Network Inside Out Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press
  191. Risse T, Ropp SC. 1999. International human rights norms and domestic change. Conclusions. See Risse et al. 1999 234–78
  192. Risse T, Ropp SC, Sikkink K. 1999. The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  193. Robinson F. 2003. NGOs and the advancement of economic and social rights: philosophical and practical controversies. Int. Relat. 17:79–96 [Google Scholar]
  194. Rodley NS. 1983. The development of United Nations activities in the field of human rights and the role of non-governmental organizations. The US, the UN, and the Management of Global Change TT Gati 263–82 New York: New York Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  195. Rodríguez-Garavito CA, Arenas LC. 2005. Indigenous rights, transnational activism, and legal mobilization: the struggle of the U'wa people in Colombia. See de Sousa Santos & Rodríguez-Garavito 2005 241–66
  196. Ron J. 2000. Savage restraint: Israel, Palestine and the dialectics of legal repression. Soc. Probl. 47:445–72 [Google Scholar]
  197. Ron J, Ramos H, Rodgers K. 2005. Transnational information politics: NGO human rights reporting, 1986–2000. Int. Stud. Q. 49:557–87 [Google Scholar]
  198. Ropp SC, Sikkink K. 1999. International norms and domestic politics in Chile and Guatemala. See Risse et al. 1999 172–204
  199. Rosen MS, Yoon DH. 2009. ‘Bringing coals to Newcastle’? Human rights, civil rights and social movements in New York City. Glob. Netw. 9:4507–28 [Google Scholar]
  200. Saiz I. 2004. Bracketing sexuality: human rights and sexual orientation—a decade of development and denial at the UN. Sex. Policy Watch 2:4–22 [Google Scholar]
  201. Sarat A, Scheingold S. 2001. Cause Lawyering and the State in a Global Era New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  202. Sarat A, Scheingold S. 2006. Cause Lawyers and Social Movements Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
  203. Schmitz H. 1999. Transnational activism and political change in Kenya and Uganda. See Risse et al. 1999 39–77
  204. Schmitz H. 2000. Mobilizing identities: transnational social movements and the promotion of human rights. Global Institutions and Local Empowerment: Competing Theoretical Perspectives K Stiles 85–113 New York: St. Martin's Press [Google Scholar]
  205. Schweigman D. 2001. The Authority of the Security Council Under Chapter VII of the UN Charter: Legal Limits and the Role of the International Court of Justice Norwell, MA: Kluwer Law Int.
  206. Seidman G. 2000. Adjusting the lens: What do globalizations, transnationalism, and the anti-apartheid movement mean for social movement theory?. See Guidry et al. 2000 339–57
  207. Seidman G. 2007. Beyond the Boycott: Labor Rights, Human Rights, and Transnational Activism New York: Russell Sage Found.
  208. Shin HJ, Tsutsui K. 2007. Constructing social movement actorhood: resident Koreans' activism in Japan since 1945. Int. J. Comp. Sociol. 48:317–35 [Google Scholar]
  209. Sikkink K. 1993. Human rights, principles issue networks, and sovereignty in Latin America. Int. Org. 47:3411–41 [Google Scholar]
  210. Sikkink K. 2004. Mixed Signals: U.S. Human Rights Policy and Latin America. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
  211. Simmons BA. 2009. Mobilizing For Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  212. Simpson AWB. 2001. Human Rights and the End of Empire: Britain and the Genesis of the European Convention New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  213. Simpson B. 2012. The first right. See Iriye et al. 2012 179–200
  214. Skrentny JD. 1998. The effect of the Cold War on African-American civil rights, 1945–1968. Theory Soc. 27:237–85 [Google Scholar]
  215. Skrentny JD. 2002. The Minority Rights Revolution Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press
  216. Smith J, Chatfield C, Pagnucco R. 1997. Transnational Social Movements and Global Politics: Solidarity Beyond the State Syracuse, NY: Syracuse Univ. Press
  217. Smith J, Johnston H. 2002. Globalization and Resistance: Transnational Dimensions of Social Movements Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield
  218. Smith J, Pagnucco R, Lopez GA. 1998. Globalizing human rights: the work of transnational human rights NGOs in the 1990s. Hum. Rights Q. 20:379–412 [Google Scholar]
  219. Smith J, Wiest D. 2005. The uneven geography of global civil society: national and global influences on transnational association. Soc. Forces 84:2621–52 [Google Scholar]
  220. Smith J, Wiest D. 2012. Social Movements in the World System: The Politics of Crisis and Transformation New York: Russell Sage Found.
  221. Snow D, Rochford ER, Worden S, Benford R. 1986. Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. Am. Sociol. Rev. 51:464–81 [Google Scholar]
  222. Snow D, Soule S. 2010. A Primer on Social Movements New York: W.W. Norton
  223. Snow D, Zurcher L, Ekland-Olson S. 1980. Social networks and social movements: a microstructural approach to differential recruitment. Am. Sociol. Rev. 45:787–801 [Google Scholar]
  224. Snyder S. 2011. Human Rights Activism and the End of the Cold War New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  225. Sohn LB. 1994. Rights in Conflict; The United Nations and South Africa Irvington, NY: Transnational
  226. Somers M, Roberts C. 2008. Toward a new sociology of rights: a genealogy of “buried bodies” of citizenship and human rights. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 4:385–425 [Google Scholar]
  227. Soohoo C, Albisa C, Davis M. 2008. Bringing Human Rights Home: A History of Human Rights in the United States Westport, CT: Praeger
  228. Soule SA. 2009. Contention and Corporate Social Responsibility New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  229. Soule SA, King BG. 2008. Competition and resource partitioning in three social movement industries. Am. J. Sociol. 113:1568–610 [Google Scholar]
  230. Swiebel J. 2009. Lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender human rights: the search for an international strategy. Contemp. Polit. 15:119–35 [Google Scholar]
  231. Tarrow SG. 2005. The New Transnational Activism New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  232. Thomas DC. 2001. The Helsinki Effect: International Norms, Human Rights, and the Demise of Communism Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  233. Thomas DQ. 2000. We are not the world: US activism and human rights in the twenty-first century. Signs 25:41121–24 [Google Scholar]
  234. Tolley H. 1989. Popular sovereignty and international law: ICJ strategies for human rights standard setting. Hum. Rights Q. 11:561–85 [Google Scholar]
  235. Tsutsui K. 2004. Global civil society and ethnic social movements in the contemporary world. Sociol. Forum 19:63–88 [Google Scholar]
  236. Tsutsui K. 2006. Redressing past human rights violations: global dimensions of contemporary social movements. Soc. Forces 85:1331–54 [Google Scholar]
  237. Tsutsui K. 2009. Rights make might: global human rights and minority social movements in Japan. Presented at Annu. Meet. Am. Sociol. Assoc. San Francisco:
  238. Tsutsui K, Shin H. 2008. Global norms, local activism and social movement outcomes: global human rights and resident Koreans in Japan. Soc. Probl. 55:3391–418 [Google Scholar]
  239. Tsutsui K, Wotipka C. 2004. Global civil society and the international human rights movement: citizen participation in international human rights nongovernmental organizations. Soc. Forces 83:587–620 [Google Scholar]
  240. Tushnet M. 1994. Making Civil Rights Law: Thurgood Marshall and the Supreme Court, 1936–1961 New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  241. Utting P. 2005. Corporate responsibility and the movement of business. Dev. Pract. 15:375–88 [Google Scholar]
  242. Van Dijk P, van Hoof F, van Rijn A, Zwaak L. 2006. Theory and Practice of the European Convention on Human Rights Oxford, UK: Intersentia
  243. Vreeland JR. 2008. Political institutions and human rights: why dictatorships enter into the United Nations Convention Against Torture. Int. Organ. 62:65–101 [Google Scholar]
  244. Walling CB, Waltz S. 2011. Human Rights: From Practice to Policy Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/89426
  245. Waltz S. 2001. Universalizing human rights: the role of small states in the construction of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Hum. Rights Q. 23:44–72 [Google Scholar]
  246. Waltz S. 2002. Reclaiming and rebuilding the history of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Third World Q. 23:437–48 [Google Scholar]
  247. Waltz S. 2004. Universal human rights: the contribution of Muslim states. Hum. Rights Q. 26:799–844 [Google Scholar]
  248. Williams M, Ford L. 1999. The World Trade Organization, social movements, and global environmental management. Environ. Polit. 8:268–89 [Google Scholar]
  249. Williams R. 1990. Encounters on the frontiers of international human rights law: redefining the terms of indigenous peoples' survival in the world. Duke Law J. 4:660–704 [Google Scholar]
  250. Wiseberg L. 1992. Human rights nongovernmental organizations. Human Rights in the World Community: Issues and Action RP Claude, B Weston 372–84 Philadelphia: Univ. Penn. Press [Google Scholar]
  251. Wiseberg L, Scoble H. 1977. The International League for Human Rights: the strategy of a human rights NGO. Ga. J. Int. Comp. Law 7:289–313 [Google Scholar]
  252. Wotipka C, Tsutsui K. 2008. Global human rights and state sovereignty: state ratification of international human rights treaties, 1965–2001. Sociol. Forum 23:4724–54 [Google Scholar]
  253. Yashar D. 1998. Contesting citizenship: indigenous movements and democracy in Latin America. Comp. Polit. 31:23–42 [Google Scholar]
  254. Yashar D. 2005. Contesting Citizenship in Latin America: The Rise of Indigenous Movements and the Postliberal Challenge New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  255. Zald M, McCarthy JD. 1987. Social Movements in an Organizational Society: Collected Essays New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102811-173849
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error