From the National Surveillance State to the Cybersurveillance State

Literature Cited

1. Ahmed N. 2014. Pentagon preparing for mass civil breakdown. Guardian June 12. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/earth-insight/2014/jun/12/pentagon-mass-civil-breakdown [Google Scholar]
2. Andrejevic M. 2014. Surveillance in the big data era. Emerging Pervasive Information and Communication Technologies (PICT): Ethical Challenges, Opportunities, and Safeguards K Pimple 55–69. Law Gov. Technol. Ser. Dordrecht, Neth.: Springer [Google Scholar]
3. Apple Inc. 2016. Use Touch ID on iPhone and iPad Cupertino, CA: Apple Inc https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT201371 [Google Scholar]
4. Assoc. Press. 2017. Companies start implanting microchips into workers' bodies. Los Angeles Times Apr. 3. http://www.latimes.com/business/technology/la-fi-tn-microchip-employees-20170403-story.html [Google Scholar]
5. Balkin J. 2008. The constitution in the National Surveillance State. Minn. Law Rev. 93:1–25 [Google Scholar]
6. Balkin J, Levinson S. 2006. The processes of constitutional change: from partisan entrenchment to the National Surveillance State. Fordham Law Rev 75:489–535 [Google Scholar]
7. BBC News. 2012. Black Hat: Iris scanners “can be tricked” by hackers. BBC News July 26. http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-18997580 [Google Scholar]
8. Bennett C, Lyon D. 2008. Playing the Identity Card: Surveillance, Security and Identification in Global Perspective Abingdon, UK: Routledge [Google Scholar]
9. boyd d, Crawford K. 2012. Critical questions for big data: provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Inf. Commun. Soc. 15:662–79 [Google Scholar]
10. Cao K, Jain A. 2016. Hacking mobile phones using 2D printed fingerprints Tech. Rep. MSU-CSE-16-2 Mich. State Univ. East Lansing, MI: http://biometrics.cse.msu.edu/Publications/Fingerprint/CaoJain_HackingMobilePhonesUsing2DPrintedFingerprint_MSU-CSE-16-2.pdf [Google Scholar]
11. Citron D, Pasquale F. 2014. The scored society: due process for automated predictions. Wash. Law Rev. 89:1–33 [Google Scholar]
12. Clarke R. 1988. Information technology and dataveillance. Commun. ACM 31:5498–512 [Google Scholar]
13. Cohen J. 2015. The biopolitical public domain: the legal construction of the surveillance economy. Philos. Technol In press. doi:10.1007/s13347-017-0258-2 [Google Scholar]
14. Cyber Sec. Res. Dev. 2016. Identity Management and Data Privacy Technologies Project Dep. Homel. Secur (on file with author) [Google Scholar]
15. Dep. Homel. Secur. 2008. Privacy Impact Assessment for the Future Attribute Screening Technology (FAST) Project Washington, DC: Dep. Homel. Secur http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/privacy/privacy_pia_st_fast.pdf [Google Scholar]
16. Donohue L. 2012. Technological leap, statutory gap, and constitutional abyss: Remote biometric identification comes of age. Minn. Law Rev. 97:407–559 [Google Scholar]
17. Duster T. 2003. Backdoor to Eugenics Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2nd ed.. [Google Scholar]
18. Faraone C, Lipp K, Riley J. 2014. Boston trolling (part I). digboston Oct. 9. https://digboston.com/boston-trolling-part-i/ [Google Scholar]
19. Ferguson A. 2015. Big data and reasonable suspicion. Univ. Pa. Law Rev. 163:327–410 [Google Scholar]
20. Ferguson A. 2016. The Internet of Things and the Fourth Amendment of effects. Calif. Law Rev. 104:805–80 [Google Scholar]
21. Fox-Brewster T. 2015. Hacking Putin's eyes: how to bypass biometrics the cheap and dirty way with Google Images. Forbes March 5. http://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2015/03/05/clone-putins-eyes-using-google-images/#61c5deb54f85 [Google Scholar]
22. Friedland S. 2015. I spy: the new self-cybersurveillance and the “Internet of Things.”. Wash. Lee Law Rev. 72:1459–501 [Google Scholar]
23. Furnas A. 2012. Homeland Security's “pre-crime” screening will never work. Atlantic April 17. http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/04/homeland-securitys-pre-crime-screening-will-never-work/255971/ [Google Scholar]
24. Garfinkel S. 2000. Database Nation: The Death of Privacy in the 21st Century Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly Media [Google Scholar]
25. Garvie C, Bedoya A, Frankle J. 2016. The Perpetual Line-Up: Unregulated Police Face Recognition in America Washington, DC: Georgetown Law Cent. Priv. Technol http://www.perpetuallineup.org [Google Scholar]
26. Gates KA. 2011. Our Biometric Future: Facial Recognition Technology and the Culture of Surveillance New York: N.Y. Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
27. Gellman B, Soltani A. 2013. NSA tracking cellphone locations worldwide, Snowden documents show. Washington Post Dec. 4. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/nsa-tracking-cellphone-locations-worldwide-snowden-documents-show/2013/12/04/5492873a-5cf2-11e3-bc56-c6ca94801fac_story.html?utm_term=.ad43a46a2530 [Google Scholar]
28. Gomez A. 2013. Immigrant tracking may impede bill: Partisan split developing over biometric data on foreigners leaving U.S.. USA Today May 9 A5 [Google Scholar]
29. Granick JS. 2017. American Spies: Modern Surveillance, Why You Should Care, and What to Do About It Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
30. Greenwald G. 2014a. No Place to Hide: Edward Snowden, the NSA, and the U.S. Surveillance State. New York: Metropolitan Books [Google Scholar]
31. Greenwald G. 2014b. Documents from No Place to Hide: Edward Snowden, the NSA, and the U.S. Surveillance State GlennGreenwald.net http://glenngreenwald.net/pdf/NoPlaceToHide-Documents-Compressed.pdf [Google Scholar]
32. Harper J. 2006. Identity Crisis: How Identification Is Overused and Misunderstood Washington, DC: Cato Inst. [Google Scholar]
33. Harris S. 2012. Giving in to the surveillance state. New York Times Aug. 22. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/23/opinion/whos-watching-the-nsa-watchers.html [Google Scholar]
34. Hern A. 2014. Hacker fakes German Minister's fingerprints using photos of her hands. Guardian Dec. 30. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/dec/30/hacker-fakes-german-ministers-fingerprints-using-photos-of-her-hands [Google Scholar]
35. Horgan J. 2013. U.S. never really ended creepy “Total Information Awareness” program. Scientific American Blog June 7. http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cross-check/2013/06/07/u-s-never-really-ended-creepy-total-information-awareness-program/ [Google Scholar]
36. Hu M. 2013. Biometric ID cybersurveillance. Ind. Law J. 88:1475–558 [Google Scholar]
37. Hu M. 2015a. Big data blacklisting. Fla. Law Rev. 67:1735–809 [Google Scholar]
38. Hu M. 2015b. Taxonomy of the Snowden disclosures. Wash. Lee Law Rev. 72:1679–767 [Google Scholar]
39. Hu M. 2015c. Small data surveillance v. big data cybersurveillance. Pepperdine Law Rev 42:773–844 [Google Scholar]
40. Hu M. 2017a. Biometric surveillance and big data governance. The Cambridge Handbook of Surveillance Law D Gray, S Henderson Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press In press [Google Scholar]
41. Hu M. 2017b. Biometric cyberintelligence and the Posse Comitatus Act. Emory Law J 66:697–763 [Google Scholar]
42. Ingram M. 2013. Even the CIA is struggling to deal with the volume of real-time social data. Gigaom March 20. https://gigaom.com/2013/03/20/even-the-cia-is-struggling-to-deal-with-the-volume-of-real-time-social-data/2/ [Google Scholar]
43. Jesse D. 2016. MSU professor helps police crack smartphone fingerprint lock. Detroit Free Press July 31. http://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/2016/07/31/michigan-state-university-fingerprint-smartphone/87719418/ [Google Scholar]
44. Kahn J. 2013. Mrs. Shipley's Ghost: The Right to Travel and Terrorist Watchlists. Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press [Google Scholar]
45. Kalhan A. 2014. Immigration surveillance. Md. Law Rev. 74:1–78 [Google Scholar]
46. Kaye D. 2013. A Fourth Amendment theory for arrestee DNA and other biometric databases. Univ. Pa. J. Const. Law 15:1095–160 [Google Scholar]
47. Koerner B. 2015. Your relative's DNA could turn you into a suspect. Wired Oct. 13. https://www.wired.com/2015/10/familial-dna-evidence-turns-innocent-people-into-crime-suspects / [Google Scholar]
48. Lessig L. 2006. Code Version 2.0 New York: Basic Books [Google Scholar]
49. Li SZ, Jain AK. 2009. Encyclopedia of Biometrics New York: Springer [Google Scholar]
50. Lynch J. 2012. From fingerprints to DNA: biometric data collection in U.S. immigrant communities and beyond. Spec. Rep., Immigr. Policy Cent. Washington, DC: [Google Scholar]
51. Lyon D. 2007. Surveillance Studies Cambridge, UK: Polity [Google Scholar]
52. Lyon D. 2009. Identifying Citizens: ID Cards as Surveillance Hoboken, NJ: Wiley [Google Scholar]
53. Magnet S. 2011. When Biometrics Fail: Gender, Race, and the Technology of Identity Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
54. Mayer-Schönberger V, Cukier K. 2013. Big Data: A Revolution that Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think London: John Murray [Google Scholar]
55. Miller G. 2012. Plan for hunting terrorists signals U.S. intends to keep adding names to kill lists. Washington Post Oct. 23. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/plan-for-hunting-terrorists-signals-us-intends-to-keep-adding-names-to-kill-lists/2012/10/23/4789b2ae-18b3-11e2-a55c-39408fbe6a4b_story.html?utm_term=.a9e6e574ee44 [Google Scholar]
56. Miller G, Tate J, Gellman B. 2013. Documents reveal NSA's extensive involvement in targeted killing program. Washington Post Oct. 16. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/documents-reveal-nsas-extensive-involvement-in-targeted-killing-program/2013/10/16/29775278-3674-11e3-8a0e-4e2cf80831fc_story.html?utm_term=.68110073e8e6 [Google Scholar]
57. Mnookin J. 2010. The courts, the NAS, and the future of forensic science. Brooklyn Law Rev 75:1209–75 [Google Scholar]
58. Modus Operandi 2012. Modus Operandi awarded $1 million U.S. Army contract for enemy and criminal behavioral recognition system. Press Release, Dec. 12. http://www.modusoperandi.com/modus-operandi-awarded-1-million-u-s-army-contract-for-enemy-and-criminal-behavioral-recognition-system/ [Google Scholar]
59. Murgia M. 2016. Biometrics will replace passwords, but it's a bad idea. Telegraph May 27. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2016/05/26/biometrics-will-replace-passwords-but-its-a-bad-idea/ [Google Scholar]
60. Murphy E. 2013. License, registration, cheek swab: DNA testing and the divided court. Harvard Law Rev 127:161–96 [Google Scholar]
61. Murray N. 2010. Profiling in the age of total information awareness. Race Class 52:23–24 [Google Scholar]
62. Newman L. 2016. Hackers trick facial-recognition logins with photos from Facebook (what else?). Wired Aug. 19. https://www.wired.com/2016/08/hackers-trick-facial-recognition-logins-photos-facebook-thanks-zuck/ [Google Scholar]
63. Niinuma K, Unsang P, Jain A. 2010. Soft biometric traits for continuous use authentication. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 5:4771–80 [Google Scholar]
64. O'Harrow R. 2005. No Place to Hide New York: Free [Google Scholar]
65. O'Neill C. 2016. Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy New York: Crown [Google Scholar]
66. Pasquale F. 2016. The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms that Control Money and Information Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
67. Pato J, Millett L. 2010. Biometric Recognition: Challenges and Opportunities Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press [Google Scholar]
68. Poindexter J. 2002. Overview of the Information Awareness Office Presented at DARPATech 2002 Conf. Anaheim, CA: Aug. 2. http://fas.org/irp/agency/dod/poindexter.html [Google Scholar]
69. Poitras L, Rosenbach M, Sontheimer M, Stark H. 2014. How the NSA helped Turkey kill Kurdish rebels. Intercept Aug. 31. https://theintercept.com/2014/08/31/nsaturkeyspiegel/ [Google Scholar]
70. Pres. Counc. Advis. Sci. Technol., Exec. Off. Pres. (PCAST). 2014. Big data and privacy: a technological perspective Rep. Pres. Washington, DC: [Google Scholar]
71. Public Intelligence 2014. Identity dominance: the U.S. military's biometric war in Afghanistan. Public Intelligence Apr. 21. https://publicintelligence.net/identity-dominance/ [Google Scholar]
72. Ramos N. 2014. City used high-tech tracking software at ‘13 Boston Calling. Boston Globe Sept. 8. https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2014/09/07/boston-watching-city-acknowledges-surveillance-tests-during-festivals/Sz9QVurQ5VnA4a6Btds8xH/story.html [Google Scholar]
73. Richards N. 2013. The dangers of surveillance. Harvard Law Rev 126:1935–65 [Google Scholar]
74. Richards N, King J. 2013. Three paradoxes of big data. Stanf. Law Rev. 66:41–46 [Google Scholar]
75. Ries L. 2010. B-Verify: transforming E-Verify into a biometric employment verification system. Albany Gov. Law Rev. 3:271–321 [Google Scholar]
76. Risen J, Poitras L. 2014. N.S.A. collecting millions of faces from web images. New York Times May 31. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/01/us/nsa-collecting-millions-of-faces-from-web-images.html [Google Scholar]
77. Rosen J. 2005. The Naked Crowd: Reclaiming Security and Freedom in an Anxious Age New York: Random House [Google Scholar]
78. Roth A. 2010. Safety in numbers: deciding when DNA alone is enough to convict. NYU Law Rev 85:1130–85 [Google Scholar]
79. Scahill J, Devereaux R. 2014. Blacklisted: the secret government rulebook for labeling you a terrorist. Intercept July 23. https://theintercept.com/2014/07/23/blacklisted/ [Google Scholar]
80. Scahill J, Greenwald G. 2014. The NSA's secret role in the U.S. assassination program. Intercept Feb. 9. https://firstlook.org/theintercept/article/2014/02/10/the-nsas-secret-role/ [Google Scholar]
81. Schneier B. 2015. Data and Goliath: The Hidden Battles to Collect Your Data and Control Your World. New York: W.W. Norton [Google Scholar]
82. Schneier B. 2016. Apple patents collecting biometric information based on unauthorized device use. Schneier on Security Blog Aug. 29. https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2016/08/apple_patents_c.html [Google Scholar]
83. Schumer C, Graham L. 2010. The right way to mend immigration. Washington Post March 19. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/17/AR2010031703115.html?utm_term=.8f9a895a857b [Google Scholar]
84. Shachtman N. 2011. Army tracking plan: drones that never forget a face. Wired Sept. 28. http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/09/drones-never-forget-a-face/ [Google Scholar]
85. Shachtman N. 2012. Air Force's top brain wants a “social radar” to “see into hearts and minds.”. Wired.com Jan. 19. http://www.wired.com/2012/01/social-radar-sees-minds/ [Google Scholar]
86. Shane P. 2007. The bureaucratic due process of government watch lists. George Wash. Law Rev. 75:804–55 [Google Scholar]
87. Shockley B. 2014. Vigilant solutions unveils mobile companion app at IACP. Vigilant Solutions Oct. 23. https://vigilantsolutions.com/stories-from-the-street/vigilant-mobile-companion-app-iacp [Google Scholar]
88. Slobogin C. 2008. Government data mining and the Fourth Amendment. Univ. Chic. Law Rev 75:317–41 [Google Scholar]
89. Slobogin C. 2014. Panvasive surveillance, political process theory, and the nondelegation doctrine. Georgetown Law J 102:1721–76 [Google Scholar]
90. Sobel R. 2002. The demeaning of identity and personhood in national identification systems. Harvard J. Law Technol. 15:319–87 [Google Scholar]
91. Solove D. 2002. Digital dossiers and the dissipation of Fourth Amendment privacy. South. Calif. Law Rev. 75:1083–168 [Google Scholar]
92. Spiro P. 2014. Expatriating terrorists. Fordham Law Rev 82:2169–87 [Google Scholar]
93. Steinbock D. 2006. Designating the dangerous: from blacklists to watch lists. Seattle Univ. Law Rev. 30:65–118 [Google Scholar]
94. Strahilevitz L. 2012. Signaling exhaustion and perfect exclusion. J. Telecommun. High Technol. Law 10:321–30 [Google Scholar]
95. Strandburg KJ, Raicu DS. 2006. Privacy and Technologies of Identity: A Cross-Disciplinary Conversation New York: Springer [Google Scholar]
96. Tau B. 2015. No-fly list is only one of many U.S. watchlists. The Wall Street Journal Dec. 8. http://www.wsj.com/articles/no-fly-list-is-only-one-of-many-u-s-watchlists-1449570602 [Google Scholar]
97. Thomson L. 2007. Critical issues in identity management—challenges for homeland security. Jurimetr. J. 47:335–56 [Google Scholar]
98. TruthMove. 2016. Total Information Awareness (TIA) System TruthMove http://www.truthmove.org/workspace/photos-content/tia_screenshot.gif [Google Scholar]
99. US Dep. Def. 2011. Terms & definitions of interest for DoD counterintelligence professionals Glossary (unclassified), Off. Counterintell., Def. CI & HUMINT Cent. Def. Intell. Agency May 2. http://fas.org/irp/eprint/ci-glossary.pdf [Google Scholar]
100. US Gen. Account. Off. 2002. Technology assessment: using biometrics for border security Rep. GAO-03–174 US Gen. Account. Off. Washington, DC: http://www.gao.gov/assets/160/157313.pdf [Google Scholar]
101. US Gov. Account. Off. 2010. Employment verification: Federal agencies have taken steps to E-Verify, but significant challenges remain GAO-11–146 US Gen. Account. Off. Washington, DC: http://www.gao.gov/assets/320/314278.pdf [Google Scholar]
102. USA Today 2003. Pentagon's “Terror Information Awareness” program will end. USA Today Sept. 25. http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/washington/2003-09-25-pentagon-office_x.htm [Google Scholar]
103. Vacca J. 2007. Biometric Technologies and Verification Systems Burlington, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann [Google Scholar]
104. Wittes B, Blum G. 2015. The Future of Violence: Robots and Germs, Hackers and Drones New York: Basic Books [Google Scholar]
105. Yakowicz W. 2016. How collecting biometric information from employees and customers could get you sued. Inc May 12. http://www.inc.com/will-yakowicz/legal-risks-of-biometrics-at-the-office.html [Google Scholar]
106. Zuboff S. 2015. Big other: surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. J. Inf. Technol. 30:75–89 [Google Scholar]