1932

Abstract

Since the Civil Litigation Research Project in the 1980s, sociolegal researchers have referenced the metaphor of the dispute pyramid to understand dispute resolution. The pyramid focuses on formal legal dispute resolution and represents disputes as a linear process of attrition in which only a small proportion of perceived injuries proceed to adjudication. Although a fertile metaphor, the dispute pyramid approach left important processes undertheorized and understudied. We propose a new metaphor: the dispute tree. The dispute tree has many branches, both legal and nonlegal, through which grievances may be resolved. Grievances may move along several branches simultaneously, and dispute resolution may be a nonlinear process. Branches represent the evolving nature of disputes as living organisms that may bear flowers and fruit or may wither and die. Not only dispute trees but also their forests are subjects for study. Dispute trees exist in social environments that may foster or inhibit healthy growth; they may grow within public or privately governed forests. We argue that the dispute tree metaphor better represents decades of research on disputing, which has identified myriad disputing channels outside of courts, as well as both individual and collective mobilization. We also believe that this new metaphor for disputes and the dispute process will open new avenues of inquiry.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110413-030826
2014-11-03
2024-04-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/lawsocsci/10/1/annurev-lawsocsci-110413-030826.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110413-030826&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abel RL. 1974. A comparative theory of dispute institutions in society. Law Soc. Rev. 8:217–347 [Google Scholar]
  2. Abel RL. 1982a. The contradictions of informal justice. See Abel 1982b 267–321
  3. Abel RL. 1982b. The Politics of Informal Justice 1 New York: Academic
  4. Abrego L. 2008. Legitimacy, social identity, and the mobilization of law: the effects of Assembly Bill 540 on undocumented students in California. Law Soc. Inq. 33:709–34 [Google Scholar]
  5. Albiston CR. 1999. The rule of law and the litigation process: the paradox of losing by winning. Law Soc. Rev. 33:869–910 [Google Scholar]
  6. Albiston CR. 2005. Bargaining in the shadow of social institutions: competing discourses and social change in workplace mobilization of civil rights. Law Soc. Rev. 39:11–50 [Google Scholar]
  7. Albiston CR. 2010. Institutional Inequality and the Mobilization of the Family and Medical Leave Act: Rights on Leave Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  8. Albiston CR. 2011. The dark side of litigation as a social movement strategy. Iowa Law Rev. Bull. 96:61–77 [Google Scholar]
  9. Albiston CR, Sandefur RL. 2013. Expanding the empirical study of access to justice. Wis. Law Rev. 2013:101–20 [Google Scholar]
  10. Amy DJ. 1987. The Politics of Environmental Mediation New York: Columbia Univ. Press
  11. Aubert V. 1963. Competition and dissensus: two types of conflict and of conflict resolution. J. Confl. Resolut. 7:26–42 [Google Scholar]
  12. Barley SR. 1986. Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Admin. Sci. Q. 31:78–108 [Google Scholar]
  13. Berrey E, Hoffman SG, Nielsen LB. 2012. Situated justice: a contextual analysis of fairness and inequality in employment discrimination litigation. Law Soc. Rev. 46:1–36 [Google Scholar]
  14. Best A, Andreasen AR. 1977. Consumer response to unsatisfactory purchases: a survey of perceiving defects, voicing complaints, and obtaining redress. Law Soc. Rev. 11:701–42 [Google Scholar]
  15. Best RK, Edelman LB, Krieger LH, Eliason SR. 2011. Multiple disadvantages: an empirical test of intersectionality theory in EEO litigation. Law Soc. Rev. 45:991–1026 [Google Scholar]
  16. Black DJ. 1971. The social organization of arrest. Stanford Law Rev. 23:1087–111 [Google Scholar]
  17. Black DJ. 1976. The Behavior of Law New York: Academic
  18. Black DJ. 1983. Crime as social control. Am. Sociol. Rev. 48:34–45 [Google Scholar]
  19. Bonnell VA, Hunt L. 1999. Introduction. Beyond the Cultural Turn: New Directions in the Study of Society and Culture VE Bonnell, L Hunt 1–32 Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press [Google Scholar]
  20. Bryan P. 1992. Killing us softly: divorce mediation and the politics of power. Buffalo Law Rev. 40:441–523 [Google Scholar]
  21. Bryan P. 1994. Reclaiming professionalism: the lawyer's role in divorce mediation. Fam. Law Q. 28:177–222 [Google Scholar]
  22. Bumiller K. 1987. Victims in the shadow of the law: a critique of the model of legal protection. Signs 12:421–39 [Google Scholar]
  23. Bumiller K. 1988. The Civil Rights Society: The Social Construction of Victims Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press
  24. Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth 524 U.S. 742 1998.
  25. Burstein P. 1991. Legal mobilization as a social movement tactic: the struggle for equal employment opportunity. Am. J. Sociol. 96:1201–25 [Google Scholar]
  26. Burstein P, Monaghan K. 1986. Equal employment opportunity and the mobilization of law. Law Soc. Rev. 20:355–88 [Google Scholar]
  27. Bush RAB. 1989. Mediation and adjudication, dispute resolution and ideology: an imaginary conversation. J. Contemp. Leg. Issues 3:1–33 [Google Scholar]
  28. Bush RAB, Folger JP. 1994. The Promise of Mediation: Responding to Conflict Through Empowerment and Recognition San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
  29. Cain M, Kulcsar K. 1981. Thinking disputes: an essay on the origins of the dispute industry. Law Soc. Rev. 16:375–402 [Google Scholar]
  30. Calavita K, Jenness V. 2013. Inside the pyramid of disputes: naming problems and filing grievances in California prisons. Soc. Probl. 69:50–80 [Google Scholar]
  31. Carlin JE, Howard J, Messinger SL. 1966. Civil justice and the poor: issues for sociological research. Law Soc. Rev. 1:9–89 [Google Scholar]
  32. Clermont KM, Eisenberg T. 1998. Do case outcomes really reveal anything about the legal system? Win rates and removal jurisdiction. Cornell Law Rev. 83:581–607 [Google Scholar]
  33. Clermont KM, Eisenberg T. 2002. Litigation realities. Cornell Law Rev. 88:119–54 [Google Scholar]
  34. Clermont KM, Schwab SJ. 2004. How employment discrimination plaintiffs fare in federal court. J. Empir. Leg. Stud. 1:429–58 [Google Scholar]
  35. Clermont KM, Schwab SJ. 2009. Employment discrimination plaintiffs in federal court: from bad to worse. Harvard Law Policy Rev. 3:103–32 [Google Scholar]
  36. Cobb S, Rifkin J. 1991. Practice and paradox: deconstructing neutrality in mediation. Law Soc. Inq. 16:35–62 [Google Scholar]
  37. Colker R. 1999. The Americans with Disabilities Act: a windfall for defendants. Harvard Civ. Rights-Civ. Lib. Law Rev. 34:99–162 [Google Scholar]
  38. Curran BA. 1977. The Legal Needs of the Public: The Final Report of a National Survey Chicago: Am. Bar Found.
  39. Dalton M. 1959. Men Who Manage New York: Wiley
  40. Delgado R, Dunn C, Brown P, Lee H, Hubbert D. 1985. Fairness and formality: minimizing the risk of prejudice in alternative dispute resolution. Wis. Law Rev. 1985:1359–404 [Google Scholar]
  41. Dobbin F. 2009. Inventing Equal Opportunity Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  42. Dunlop JT. 1976. The limits of legal compulsion. Labor Law J. 27:67–74 [Google Scholar]
  43. Dunlop JT, Zack AM. 1997. Mediation and Arbitration of Employment Disputes San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
  44. Edelman LB. 1990. Legal environments and organizational governance: the expansion of due process in the American workplace. Am. J. Sociol. 95:1401–40 [Google Scholar]
  45. Edelman LB. 1992. Legal ambiguity and symbolic structures: organizational mediation of civil rights law. Am. J. Sociol. 97:1531–76 [Google Scholar]
  46. Edelman LB, Abraham SE, Erlanger HS. 1992. Professional construction of law: the inflated threat of wrongful discharge. Law Soc. Rev. 26:47–83 [Google Scholar]
  47. Edelman LB, Cahill M. 1998. How law matters in disputing and dispute processing (or, the contingency of legal matter in alternative dispute resolution). How Law Matters B Garth, A Sarat 15–44 Evanston, IL: Northwest. Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  48. Edelman LB, Erlanger HS, Lande J. 1993. Internal dispute resolution: the transformation of civil rights in the workplace. Law Soc. Rev. 27:497–534 [Google Scholar]
  49. Edelman LB, Fuller SR, Mara-Drita I. 2001. Diversity rhetoric and the managerialization of law. Am. J. Sociol. 106:1589–641 [Google Scholar]
  50. Edelman LB, Suchman MC. 1999. When the “haves” hold court: speculations on the organizational internalization of law. Law Soc. Rev. 33:941–91 [Google Scholar]
  51. Edelman LB, Uggen C, Erlanger HS. 1999. The endogeneity of legal regulation: grievance procedures as rational myth. Am. J. Sociol. 105:406–54 [Google Scholar]
  52. Eisenberg T, Hill E. 2003. Arbitration and litigation of employment claims: an empirical comparison. Disput. Resolut. J. 58:444–55 [Google Scholar]
  53. Eisenberg T, Lanvers C. 2009. What is the settlement rate and why should we care?. J. Empir. Leg. Stud. 6:111–46 [Google Scholar]
  54. Ellickson R. 1991. Order Without Law: How Neighbors Settle Disputes Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  55. Emerson RM. 2008. Responding to roommate troubles: reconsidering informal dyadic control. Law Soc. Rev. 42:483–512 [Google Scholar]
  56. Engel DM. 1984. The oven bird's song: insiders, outsiders, and personal injuries in an American community. Law Soc. Rev. 18:551–82 [Google Scholar]
  57. Engel DM, Munger FW. 1996. Rights, remembrance, and the reconciliation of difference. Law Soc. Rev. 30:7–54 [Google Scholar]
  58. Engel DM, Munger FW. 2003. Rights of Inclusion: Law and Identity in the Life Stories of Americans with Disabilities Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  59. Erlanger HS, Chambliss E, Melli MS. 1987. Participation and flexibility in informal processes: cautions from the divorce context. Law Soc. Rev. 21:585–604 [Google Scholar]
  60. Ewick P, Silbey SS. 1998. The Common Place of Law Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  61. Ewick P, Silbey SS. 2003. Narrating social structure: stories of resistance to legal authority. Am. J. Sociol. 108:1328–72 [Google Scholar]
  62. Ewing DW. 1989. Justice on the Job: Resolving Grievances in the Nonunion Workplace Cambridge: Harvard Bus. Sch. Press
  63. Felstiner WLF. 1974. Influences of social organization on dispute processing. Law Soc. Rev. 9:63–94 [Google Scholar]
  64. Felstiner WLF, Abel RL, Sarat A. 1980. The emergence and transformation of disputes: naming, blaming, claiming…. Law Soc. Rev. 15:631–54 [Google Scholar]
  65. Ferree MM. 2003. Resonance and radicalism: feminist framing in the abortion debates of the United States and Germany. Am. J. Sociol. 109:304–44 [Google Scholar]
  66. Fineman M. 1988. Dominant discourse, professional language, and legal change in child custody decisionmaking. Harvard Law Rev. 101:727–74 [Google Scholar]
  67. Fisher R, Ury W. 1981. Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In Boston: Houghton Mifflin
  68. Fiss OM. 1984. Against settlement. Yale Law J. 93:1073–90 [Google Scholar]
  69. Galanter M. 1974. Why the “haves” come out ahead: speculations on the limits of legal change. Law Soc. Rev. 9:95–160 [Google Scholar]
  70. Galanter M. 1983. Reading the landscape of disputes: what we know and don't know (and think we know) about our allegedly contentious and litigious society. UCLA Law Rev. 31:4–71 [Google Scholar]
  71. Galanter M. 1990. Case congregations and their careers. Law Soc. Rev. 24:371–95 [Google Scholar]
  72. Galanter M, Rogers J. 1991. A transformation of American business disputing? Some preliminary observations Work. Pap. DPRP #10–3, Inst. Leg. Stud., Madison, WI
  73. Geertz C. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures New York: Basic Books
  74. Gouldner AW. 1956. Explorations in applied social science. Soc. Probl. 3:169–81 [Google Scholar]
  75. Greatbatch D, Dingwall R. 1989. Selective facilitation: some preliminary observations on a strategy used by divorce mediators. Law Soc. Rev. 23:613–41 [Google Scholar]
  76. Grillo T. 1991. The mediation alternative: process dangers for women. Yale Law J. 100:1545–610 [Google Scholar]
  77. Grossman JB, Sarat A. 1975. Litigation in the federal courts: a comparative perspective. Law Soc. Rev. 9:321–46 [Google Scholar]
  78. Grossman JB, Trubek DM. 1980. Special issue on dispute processing and civil litigation. Law Soc. Rev. (Spec. Issue) 15: [Google Scholar]
  79. Gulliver PH. 1969. Introduction: case studies of law in non-Western societies. Law in Culture and Society L Nader 11–23 Chicago: Aldine [Google Scholar]
  80. Handler JF. 1978. Social Movements and the Legal System: A Theory of Law Reform and Social Change New York: Academic
  81. Hirsch SF. 1992. Subjects in spite of themselves: legal consciousness among working-class New Englanders. Law Soc. Inq. 17:839–57 [Google Scholar]
  82. Hirsh CE, Kornrich S. 2008. The context of discrimination: workplace conditions, institutional environments, and sex and race discrimination charges. Am. J. Sociol. 113:1394–432 [Google Scholar]
  83. Hoffmann EA. 2003. Legal consciousness and dispute resolution: different disputing behavior at two similar taxicab companies. Law Soc. Inq. 28:691–716 [Google Scholar]
  84. Hoffmann EA. 2005. Dispute resolution in a worker cooperative: formal procedures and procedural justice. Law Soc. Rev. 39:51–82 [Google Scholar]
  85. Hofrichter R. 1987. Neighborhood Justice in Capitalist Society: The Expansion of the Informal State New York: Greenwood
  86. Johnson E Jr. 1974. Justice and Reform: The Formative Years of the American Legal Services Program New Brunswick, NJ: Russell Sage Found.
  87. Kaiser CR, Miller CT. 2003. Derogating the victim: the interpersonal consequences of blaming events on discrimination. Group Process. Intergroup Relat. 6:227–37 [Google Scholar]
  88. Kessler M. 1990. Legal mobilization for social reform: power and the politics of agenda setting. Law Soc. Rev. 24:121–43 [Google Scholar]
  89. Kidder RL. 1980. The end of the road? Problems in the analysis of disputes. Law Soc. Rev. 15:717–25 [Google Scholar]
  90. Kolb DM. 1992. Women's work: peacemaking in organizations. See Kolb & Bartunek 1992 63–91
  91. Kolb DM, Bartunek JM. 1992. Hidden Conflict in Organizations: Uncovering Behind-the-Scenes Disputes Newbury Park, CA: Sage
  92. Kritzer HM. 2011. The antecedents of disputes: complaining and claiming. Oñati Socio-Leg. Series 1:61–31 [Google Scholar]
  93. Kritzer HM, Silbey SS. 1999. Do the “haves” still come out ahead?. Law Soc. Rev. (Spec. Issue) 33: [Google Scholar]
  94. Kritzer HM, Vidmar N, Bogart WA. 1991. To confront or not to confront: measuring claiming rates in discrimination grievances. Law Soc. Rev. 25:875–87 [Google Scholar]
  95. Lande J. 1997. How will lawyering and mediation practices transform each other?. Fla. State Univ. Law Rev. 24:839–901 [Google Scholar]
  96. Lande J. 1998. Failing faith in litigation? A survey of business lawyers' and executives' opinions. Harvard Negot. Law Rev. 3:1–70 [Google Scholar]
  97. Lawrence SE. 1991. Participation through mobilization of the law: institutions providing indigents with access to the civil courts. Polity 23:423–42 [Google Scholar]
  98. Lazerson MH. 1982. In the halls of justice, the only justice is in the halls. See Abel 1982b 119–60
  99. Leachman GM. 2014. From protest to Perry: how litigation shaped the LGBT movement's agenda. UC Davis Law Rev. 47:1667–751 [Google Scholar]
  100. Levine K, Mellema V. 2001. Strategizing the street: how law matters in the lives of women in the street-level drug economy. Law Soc. Inq. 26:169–207 [Google Scholar]
  101. Levitsky SR. 2006. To lead with law: reassessing the influence of legal advocacy organizations in social movements. Cause Lawyers and Social Movements A Sarat, SA Scheingold 145–63 Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  102. Levitsky SR. 2008. “What rights?” The construction of political claims to American health care entitlements. Law Soc. Rev. 42:551–90 [Google Scholar]
  103. Lind EA, Greenberg J, Scott KS, Welchans TD. 2000. The winding road from employee to complainant: situational and psychological determinants of wrongful-termination claims. Admin. Sci. Q. 45:557–90 [Google Scholar]
  104. Lind EA, Tyler TR. 1988. The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice New York: Plenum
  105. Lipsky DB, Seeber RJ. 1998. In search of control: the corporate embrace of ADR. Univ. Pa. J. Labor Employ. Law 1:133–57 [Google Scholar]
  106. Llewellyn KN, Hoebel EA. 1941. The Cheyenne Way: Conflict and Case Law in Primitive Jurisprudence Norman: Univ. Okla. Press
  107. Macaulay S. 1963. Non-contractual relations in business: a preliminary study. Am. Sociol. Rev. 28:55–67 [Google Scholar]
  108. Major B, Kaiser CR. 2005. Perceiving and claiming discrimination. Handbook of Employment Discrimination Research LB Nielsen, RL Nelson 285–99 New York: Springer [Google Scholar]
  109. Marshall AM. 2003. Injustice frames, legality, and the everyday construction of sexual harassment. Law Soc. Inq. 28:659–89 [Google Scholar]
  110. Marshall AM. 2005. Idle rights: employees' rights consciousness and the construction of sexual harassment policies. Law Soc. Rev. 39:83–124 [Google Scholar]
  111. Martin J. 1990. Deconstructing organizational taboos: the suppression of gender conflict in organizations. Organ. Sci. 4:339–59 [Google Scholar]
  112. Mather L, McEwen CA, Maiman RJ. 2001. Divorce Lawyers at Work: Varieties of Professionalism in Practice. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  113. Mayhew LH. 1975. Institutions of representation: civil justice and the public. Law Soc. Rev. 9:401–29 [Google Scholar]
  114. Mayhew LH, Reiss AJ Jr. 1969. The social organization of legal contacts. Am. Sociol. Rev. 34:309–18 [Google Scholar]
  115. McCann MW. 1994. Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  116. McEwen CA. 1998. Managing corporate disputing: overcoming barriers to the effective use of mediation for reducing the cost and time of litigation. Ohio State J. Disput. Resolut. 14:1–27 [Google Scholar]
  117. Menkel-Meadow C. 1984. Toward another view of legal negotiation: the structure of problem solving. UCLA Law Rev. 31:754–842 [Google Scholar]
  118. Merry SE. 1990. Getting Justice and Getting Even: Legal Consciousness Among Working-Class Americans Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  119. Merry SE, Silbey SS. 1984. What do plaintiffs want? Reexamining the concept of dispute. Justice Syst. J. 9:151–78 [Google Scholar]
  120. Miller RE, Sarat A. 1980. Grievances, claims, and disputes: assessing the adversary culture. Law Soc. Rev. 15:525–66 [Google Scholar]
  121. Mnookin RH, Kornhauser L. 1979. Bargaining in the shadow of the law: the case of divorce. Yale Law J. 88:950–97 [Google Scholar]
  122. Moore CW. 1986. The Mediation Process: Practical Strategies for Resolving Conflict San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
  123. Morgan PA. 1999. Risking relationships: understanding the litigation choices of sexually harassed women. Law Soc. Rev. 33:67–91 [Google Scholar]
  124. Morrill C. 1992. The private ordering of professional relations. See Kolb & Bartunek 1992 57–70
  125. Morrill C. 1995. The Executive Way: Conflict Management in Corporations Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  126. Morrill C, Edelman LB, Tyson K, Arum R. 2010. Legal mobilization in schools: the paradox of rights and race among youth. Law Soc. Rev. 44:651–94 [Google Scholar]
  127. Morrill C, Musheno M. 2014. Youth Conflict: Culture and Control in an Urban High School Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press. In press
  128. Morrill C, Rudes DS. 2010. Conflict resolution in organizations. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 6:627–51 [Google Scholar]
  129. Myrick A, Nelson RL, Nielsen LB. 2012. Race and representation: racial disparities in legal representation for employment civil rights plaintiffs. NYU J. Legis. Soc. Policy 15:705–59 [Google Scholar]
  130. Nader L. 1983. A comparative perspective on legal evolution, revolution, and devolution. Mich. Law Rev. 81:993–1005 [Google Scholar]
  131. Nader L. 1993. Controlling processes in the practice of law: hierarchy and pacification in the movement to re-form dispute ideology. Ohio State J. Disput. Resolut. 9:1–25 [Google Scholar]
  132. Nader L, Todd HF Jr. 1978a. Introduction: the disputing process. See Nader & Todd 1978b 1–40
  133. Nader L, Todd HF Jr. 1978b. The Disputing Process—Law in Ten Societies New York: Columbia Univ. Press
  134. NeJaime D. 2011. Winning through losing. Univ. Iowa Law Rev. 96:941–1012 [Google Scholar]
  135. Nielsen LB. 2000. Situating legal consciousness: experiences and attitudes of ordinary citizens about law and street harassment. Law Soc. Rev. 34:1055–90 [Google Scholar]
  136. Nielsen LB, Nelson RL. 2008. Scaling the pyramid: a sociolegal model of employment discrimination litigation. Handbook of Employment Discrimination Research LB Nielsen, RL Nelson 3–34 New York: Springer [Google Scholar]
  137. Nielsen LB, Nelson RL, Lancaster R. 2010. Individual justice or collective legal mobilization? Employment discrimination litigation in the post-civil rights United States. J. Empir. Leg. Stud. 7:175–201 [Google Scholar]
  138. Pleasence P, Genn H, Balmer NJ, Buck A, O'Grady A. 2003. Causes of action: first findings of the LSRC Periodic Survey. J. Law Soc. 30:11–30 [Google Scholar]
  139. Quinn BA. 2000. The paradox of complaining: law, humor, and harassment in the everyday work world. Law Soc. Inq. 25:1151–85 [Google Scholar]
  140. Reuben RC. 1996. The lawyer turns peacemaker. ABA J. 82:54–62 [Google Scholar]
  141. Reuben RC. 1997. Public justice: toward a state action theory of alternative dispute resolution. Calif. Law Rev. 85:577–641 [Google Scholar]
  142. Rosenberg GN. 1991. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  143. Saks MJ. 1992. Do we really know anything about the behavior of the tort litigation system—and why not?. Univ. Pa. Law Rev. 140:1147–292 [Google Scholar]
  144. Sandefur RL. 2007. The importance of doing nothing: everyday problems and responses of inaction. Transforming Lives: Law and Social Process P Pleasence, A Buck, N Balmer 112–32 London: Station. Off. [Google Scholar]
  145. Sandefur RL. 2008. Access to civil justice and race, class, and gender inequality. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 34:339–58 [Google Scholar]
  146. Sarat A. 1976. Alternatives in dispute processing: litigation in a small claims court. Law Soc. Rev. 10:339–75 [Google Scholar]
  147. Sarat A, Felstiner WLF. 1986. Law and strategy in the divorce lawyer's office. Law Soc. Rev. 20:93–134 [Google Scholar]
  148. Sarat A, Felstiner WLF. 1988. Law and social relations: vocabularies of motive in lawyer/client interaction. Law Soc. Rev. 22:737–69 [Google Scholar]
  149. Sarat A, Felstiner WLF. 1989. Lawyers and legal consciousness: law talk in the divorce lawyer's office. Yale Law J. 98:1663–88 [Google Scholar]
  150. Scheingold SA. 1974. The Politics of Rights: Lawyers, Public Policy, and Political Change. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  151. Schwartz RD. 1954. Social factors in the development of legal control: a case study of two Israeli settlements. Yale Law J. 63:471–91 [Google Scholar]
  152. Selznick P. 1969. Law, Society, and Industrial Justice New York: Russell Sage Found.
  153. Seron C, Silbey SS. 2004. Profession, science, and culture: an emergent canon of law and society research. The Blackwell Companion to Law and Society A Sarat 30–59 Oxford, UK: Blackwell [Google Scholar]
  154. Siegelman P, Donohue JJ. 1990. Studying the iceberg from its tip: a comparison of published and unpublished employment discrimination cases. Law Soc. Rev. 24:1133–70 [Google Scholar]
  155. Silbey SS, Merry SE. 1986. Mediator settlement strategies. Law Policy 8:7–32 [Google Scholar]
  156. Silbey SS, Sarat A. 1989. Dispute processing in law and legal scholarship: from institutional critique to the reconstitution of the juridical subject. Univ. Denver Law Rev. 66:437–98 [Google Scholar]
  157. Sloan FA, Hsieh CR. 1995. Injury, liability, and the decision to file a medical malpractice claim. Law Soc. Rev. 29:413–35 [Google Scholar]
  158. Snyder FG. 1981. Anthropology, dispute processes and law: a critical introduction. Br. J. Law Soc. 8:141–80 [Google Scholar]
  159. Spitzer S. 1983. Marxist perspectives in the sociology of law. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 9:103–24 [Google Scholar]
  160. Starr J. 1978. Turkish village disputing behavior. See Nader & Todd 1978b 122–51
  161. Stipanowich T, Lamare JR. 2014. Living with “ADR”: evolving perceptions and use of mediation, arbitration and conflict management in Fortune 1,000 corporations. Harvard Negot. Law Rev. In press
  162. Strauss AL. 1978. Negotiations: Varieties, Contexts, Processes, and Social Order San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
  163. Sutton JR, Dobbin F, Meyer JW, Scott WR. 1994. Legalization of the workplace. Am. J. Sociol. 99:944–71 [Google Scholar]
  164. Talesh SA. 2009. The privatization of public legal rights: how manufacturers construct the meaning of consumer law. Law Soc. Rev. 43:527–62 [Google Scholar]
  165. Talesh SA. 2012. How dispute resolution system design matters: an organizational analysis of dispute resolution structures and consumer lemon laws. Law Soc. Rev. 46:463–96 [Google Scholar]
  166. Thompson EP. 1975. Whigs and Hunters: The Origins of the Black Act New York: Pantheon
  167. Todd HF Jr. 1978. Litigious marginals: character and disputing in a Bavarian village. See Nader & Todd 1978b 86–121
  168. Trautner MN. 2011. Tort reform and access to justice: how legal environments shape lawyers' case selection. Qual. Sociol. 34:523–38 [Google Scholar]
  169. Trubek DM, Sarat A, Felstiner WL, Kritzer HM. 1983. The costs of ordinary litigation. UCLA Law Rev. 31:72–127 [Google Scholar]
  170. Tucker J. 1993. Everyday forms of employee resistance. Sociol. Forum 8:25–45 [Google Scholar]
  171. Tushnet M. 1984. An essay on rights. Tex. Law Rev. 62:1363–403 [Google Scholar]
  172. Tyler T. 1990. Why People Obey the Law New Haven: Yale Univ. Press
  173. Vidmar N, Schuller RA. 1987. Individual differences and the pursuit of legal rights. Law Hum. Behav. 11:299–317 [Google Scholar]
  174. Wakefield S, Uggen C. 2004. The declining significance of race in federal civil rights law: the social structure of employment discrimination claims. Sociol. Inq. 74:128–57 [Google Scholar]
  175. Weber M. 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretative Sociology 1 Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  176. Weingarten H. 1986. Strategic planning for divorce mediation. Soc. Work 31:194–200 [Google Scholar]
  177. Westin AF, Feliu AG. 1988. Resolving Employment Disputes Without Litigation Washington, DC: Bur. Natl. Aff.
  178. Witty CJ. 1978. Disputing issues in Shehaam, a multireligious village in Lebanon. See Nader & Todd 1978b 281–314
  179. Yngvesson BB. 1978. The Atlantic fishermen. See Nader & Todd 1978b 59–85
  180. Yngvesson BB, Hennessey P. 1975. Small claims, complex disputes: a review of the small claims literature. Law Soc. Rev. 9:219–74 [Google Scholar]
  181. Zemans FK. 1982. Framework for analysis of legal mobilization: a decision-making model. Law Soc. Inq. 7:989–1071 [Google Scholar]
  182. Zemans FK. 1983. Legal mobilization: the neglected role of the law in the political system. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 77:690–703 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110413-030826
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110413-030826
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error