1932

Abstract

This article analyzes more than four decades of environmental law, regulation, and governance in various Anglo-Saxon and global jurisdictions. It shows how, after the heydays of law and command and control and the swing to economic instruments, voluntarism, and light-handed initiatives, new phases evolved—their most important manifestations being pluralistic regulation, new technologies, compliance, and new governance. It shows how each of the frameworks examined proposes its own solutions and has something valuable to offer, as well as its own limitations. The article concludes by discussing a fundamental challenge confronting the field, namely, how to orchestrate the many possible approaches and relationships available on the legal, regulatory, and governance spectrum.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110615-084651
2016-10-27
2024-06-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/lawsocsci/12/1/annurev-lawsocsci-110615-084651.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110615-084651&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abbott K. 2015. Orchestration.. Encyclopaedia of Global Environmental Governance and Politics P Pattberg, F Zelli 487–98 Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar [Google Scholar]
  2. Amoco/EPA Yorktown Proj 2009. Lessons Learned and Future Steps http://www.fischer-tropsch.org/DOE/_conf_proc/MISC/CONF-94013319/CONF-94013319,%20Tabs%2012%20-%2018%20(pgs.%201–35).pdf [Google Scholar]
  3. Andonova L. 2010. Public-private partnerships for the earth: politics and patterns of hybrid authority in the multilateral system global. Environ. Polit. 102:25–53 [Google Scholar]
  4. Andrade G, Rhodes J. 2012. Protected areas and local communities: an inevitable partnership toward successful conservation strategies?. Ecol. Soc. 17:414 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bardach E, Kagan R. 2002. Going by the Book: The Problem of Regulatory Unreasonableness Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  6. Bartel R. 2005. When the heavenly gaze criminalises: satellite surveillance, land clearance regulation and the human-nature relationship. Curr. Issues Crim. Justice 16:3322–39 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bendell J. 2000. Civil regulation: a new forum of democractic governance for the global economy. Terms of Endearment: Business, NGOs and Sustainable Development J Bendell 239–54 London: Greenleaf [Google Scholar]
  8. Berkes F, Folke C. 1998. Linking Social and Ecological Systems Cambridge, UK: Camb. Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  9. Biber E. 2011. The problem of environmental monitoring. Univ. Colo. Law Rev. 83:11–82 [Google Scholar]
  10. Biermann F. 2014. The Anthropocene: a governance perspective. Anthropocene Rev. 1:157–61 [Google Scholar]
  11. Biermann F, Pattberg P. 2012. Global Environmental Governance Reconsidered Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  12. Braithwaite J. 2008. Regulatory Capitalism: How It Works, Ideas for Making It Work Better Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar [Google Scholar]
  13. Carrigan C, Coglianese. 2011. The politics of regulation: from new institutionalism to new governance. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 14:107–29 [Google Scholar]
  14. Carson R. 1962. Silent Spring Boston: Houghton Mifflin [Google Scholar]
  15. Chaffin B, Gosnell H, Cosens B. 2014. A decade of adaptive governance scholarship: synthesis and future directions. Ecol. Soc. 19:356 [Google Scholar]
  16. Chaffin B, Gunderson L. 2016. Emergence, institutionalisation and renewal: rhythms of adaptive governance in complex socio-ecological systems. J. Environ. Manag. 165:81–87 [Google Scholar]
  17. Coase RH. 1960. The problem of social cost. J. Law Econ. 3:1–44 [Google Scholar]
  18. Coglianese C, Nash J. 2006. Leveraging the Private Sector: Management-Based Strategies for Improving Environmental Performance Washington, DC: Resour. Future [Google Scholar]
  19. Cohen S. 1986. EPA: a qualified success. Controversies in Environmental Policy S Kamieniecki, R O'Brien, M Clarke, p 174 Albany: State Univ. N. Y. Press [Google Scholar]
  20. Cottrell M, Trubek D. 2012. Law as problem solving: standards, networks, experimentation and deliberation in global space. Transnatl. Law Contemp. Probl. 21:359–93 [Google Scholar]
  21. Craig R, Ruhl JB. 2014. Designing administrative law for adaptive management. Vanderbilt Law Rev. 67:11–87 [Google Scholar]
  22. Crow M. 2000. Beyond experiments. Environ. Forum May/June 19–29 [Google Scholar]
  23. De Burca G. 2010. New governance and experimentalism: an introduction. Wisc. Law Rev. 2:227–38 [Google Scholar]
  24. De Burca G, Keohane R, Sabel C. 2013. New modes of pluralist global governance. N. Y. Univ. J. Int. Law Polit. 45:723–86 [Google Scholar]
  25. De Burca G, Scott J. 2006. Law and New Governance in the EU and the US Oxford: Hart [Google Scholar]
  26. De Capitani di Vimercati S, Genovese A, Livraga G, Piuri V, Scotti F. 2013. Privacy and security in environmental monitoring systems: issues and solution. Computer and Information Security Handbook J Vacca pp 835–53 Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann [Google Scholar]
  27. Deacon D. 2010. Deregulation through nonenforcement. N.Y. Univ. Law Rev. 85:795–828 [Google Scholar]
  28. Delmas M, Etzion D, Nairn-Birch N. 2013. Triangulating environmental performance: What do corporate social responsibility ratings really capture?. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 27:3255–67 [Google Scholar]
  29. Dewey J. 1946. Problems of Men New York: Philos. Libr. [Google Scholar]
  30. Driessen P, Dieperink C, van Laerhoven F, Runhaar H, Vermeulen W. 2012. Towards a conceptual framework for the study of shifts in modes of environmental governance—experiences from the Netherlands. Environ. Policy Gov. 22:143–60 [Google Scholar]
  31. Dryzek J, Norgaard R, Schlosberg D. 2011. The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  32. Eccles T, Pointing J. 2013. Smart regulation, shifting architectures and changes in governance. Int. J. Law Built Environ. 5:171–88 [Google Scholar]
  33. Fisher E, Lange B, Scotford E. 2013. Environmental Law: Text, Cases and Materials New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  34. Freeman J, Farber D. 2005. Modular environmental regulation. Duke Law J. 54:795–912 [Google Scholar]
  35. Friedman M. 1962. Capitalism and Freedom Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  36. Fung A, O'Rourke D. 2000. Reinventing environmental regulation from the grassroots up: explaining and expanding the success of the Toxics Release Inventory. Environ. Manag. 25:2115–17 [Google Scholar]
  37. Galaz V. 2014. Global Environmental Governance, Technology and Politics: The Anthropocene Gap Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar [Google Scholar]
  38. Gess K. 1964. Permanent sovereignty over natural resources. Int. Comp. Law Q. 13:2398–449 [Google Scholar]
  39. Gibson R. 2000. Voluntary initiatives, the new politics of corporate greening. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ. 3:1305–8 [Google Scholar]
  40. Gill S. 2015. Critical Perspectives on the Crisis of Global Governance: Reimagining the Future Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan [Google Scholar]
  41. Glasbergen P, Biermann F, Mol A. 2007. Partnerships, Governance and Sustainable Development Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar [Google Scholar]
  42. Godden L. 2008. Property in urban water: private rights and public governance. Troubled Waters P Troy Canberra: Aust. Natl. Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  43. Gómez-Baggethun E, Muradian R. 2015. In markets we trust? Setting the boundaries of market-based instruments in ecosystem services governance. Ecol. Econ. 117217–24 [Google Scholar]
  44. Gunningham N. 2007. Mine Safety: Law, Regulation, Policy Sydney: Fed. Press [Google Scholar]
  45. Gunningham N. 2009a. Environment law, regulation and governance: shifting architectures. J. Environ. Law 21:2179–212 [Google Scholar]
  46. Gunningham N. 2009b. The new collaborative environmental governance: the localisation of regulation. J. Law Soc. 36:1146–66 [Google Scholar]
  47. Gunningham N. 2012. Confronting the challenge of energy governance. Transnatl. Environ. Law 1:1119–35 [Google Scholar]
  48. Gunningham N, Graborsky P, Sinclair D. 1998. Smart Regulation: Designing Environmental Policy New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  49. Gunningham N, Kagan R, Thornton D. 2003. Shades of Green: Business, Regulation, and Environment Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  50. Gunningham N, Sinclair D. 2002. Leaders & Laggards Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf [Google Scholar]
  51. Gunningham N, Sinclair D. 2005. Policy instrument choice and diffuse source pollution. J. Environ. Law 17:151–81 [Google Scholar]
  52. Hampton P. 2005. Reducing Administrative Burdens: Effective Inspections and Enforcement London: Her Majesty's Treas. [Google Scholar]
  53. Harrison K. 2001. Voluntarism and environmental governance. Governing the Environment: Persistent Challenges, Uncertain Innovations EA Parson Toronto: Univ. Toronto Press [Google Scholar]
  54. Harlow C. 2005. Deconstructing government. Institutions and Public Law, Comparative Approaches T Ginsburg, R Kagan 141–70 New York: Peter Lang [Google Scholar]
  55. Hart S. 1997. Strategies for a sustainable world. Harv. Bus. Rev. 75:166–76 [Google Scholar]
  56. Hawkins K. 1984. Environment and Enforcement Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  57. Hayek F. 1945. The use of knowledge in society. Am. Econ. Rev. 35:4519–30 [Google Scholar]
  58. Heiler K. 2006. Is the Australian mining industry ready for a safety case regime? Work. Pap. 45, Natl. Res. Cent. Occup. Health Saf. Regul, Aust. Natl. Univ., Canberra [Google Scholar]
  59. Hindin D. 2015. Using next generation compliance drivers in permits and rules: advanced monitoring, remote sensing, and data gathering, analysis and disclosure in compliance and enforcement symposium Presented at J.B. and Maurice C. Shapiro Environ. Law Symp. Washington, DC: [Google Scholar]
  60. Hodges H. 1997. Falling prices: cost of complying with environmental regulations almost always less than advertised Brief. Pap. 69, Econ. Policy Inst., Washington, DC http://www.epi.org/publication/bp69/ [Google Scholar]
  61. Hoffman A. 2001. From Heresy to Dogma: An Institutional History of Corporate Environmentalism Stanford, CA: Stanf. Bus. Books [Google Scholar]
  62. Holley C. 2010. Facilitating monitoring, subverting self-interest and limiting discretion: learning from “new” forms of accountability in practice. Columbia J. Environ. Law 35:1127–211 [Google Scholar]
  63. Holley C. 2015. Linking law and new governance: examining gaps, hybrids, and integration in water policy. Law Policy 38:24–53 [Google Scholar]
  64. Holley C. 2016. Environmental regulation and governance. Regulation, Institutions and Networks P Drahos Canberra: Aust. Natl. Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  65. Holley C, Gunningham N. 2006. Environment improvement plans: facilitative regulation in practice. Environ. Plan. Law J. 23:448–64 [Google Scholar]
  66. Holley C, Gunningham N. 2011. Natural resources, new governance and legal regulation: When does collaboration work?. N. Z. Univ. Law Rev. 24309–36 [Google Scholar]
  67. Holley C, Gunningham N, Shearing C. 2012. The New Environmental Governance Abingdon, UK: Earthscan [Google Scholar]
  68. Holley C, Shearing C. 2016. A nodal perspective of governance: advances in nodal governance thinking. Regulation, Institutions and Networks P Drahos Canberra: Aust. Natl. Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  69. Holley C, Sinclair D. 2012. Compliance and enforcement of water licences in NSW: limitations in law, policy and institutions. Australas. J. Natl. Resour. Law Policy 15:2149–89 [Google Scholar]
  70. Holley C, Sinclair D. 2014. Collaborative water governance and audited self management: A new water policy option for Australia?. Australas. J. Natl. Resour. Law Policy 17:2189–216 [Google Scholar]
  71. Holley C, Sinclair D. 2016. Regulation, technology, and water: “buy-in” as a precondition for effective real-time advanced monitoring, compliance and enforcement. George Washington J. Energy Environ. Law 7:152–66 [Google Scholar]
  72. Holling CS. 1978. Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management Chichester, UK: Wiley [Google Scholar]
  73. Holling CS, Meffe G. 1996. Command and control and the pathology of natural resource management. Conserv. Biol. 10:328–37 [Google Scholar]
  74. Howlett M. 2014. From the ‘old’ to the ‘new’ policy design: design thinking beyond markets and collaborative governance. Policy Sci. 47:187–207 [Google Scholar]
  75. Int. Netw. Environ. Compliance Enforc. (INECE) 2015. Conference Examines Behavioral and Social Aspects of NextGen Compliance Washington, DC: INECE http:inece.org/resource/conference-examines-behavioral-and-social-aspects-of-nextgen-compliance/ [Google Scholar]
  76. Johnston L, Shearing C. 2003. Governing Security: Explorations in Policing and Justice London: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  77. Jordan A, Huitema D, Hildén M, van Asselt H, Rayner TJ. et al. 2015. Emergence of polycentric climate governance and its future prospects. Nat. Climate Change 5:977–82 [Google Scholar]
  78. Jordan A, Wurzel R, Zito A. 2013. Still the century of “new” environmental policy instruments? Exploring patterns of innovation and continuity in environmental politics. Environ. Polit. 22:1155–73 [Google Scholar]
  79. Karevia P, McNally B, McCormick S, Miller T, Ruckelshaus M. 2015. Improving global environmental management with standard corporate reporting. PNAS 112:247357–82 [Google Scholar]
  80. Karkkainen B. 2001. Information as environmental regulation: TRI performance benchmarking, precursor to a new paradigm?. Georget. Law J. 89:257–370 [Google Scholar]
  81. Karkkainen B. 2004a. Post-sovereign environmental governance. Glob. Environ. Polit. 4:172–96 [Google Scholar]
  82. Karkkainen B. 2004b. Reply, new governance in legal thought and in the world: some splitting as antidote to overzealous lumping. Minn. Law Rev. 89:471–97 [Google Scholar]
  83. Karkkainen B. 2006. Information forcing regulation and environmental governance. Law and New Governance in the EU and the US G De Burca, J Scott 293–321 Oxford: Hart [Google Scholar]
  84. Karkkainen B, Fung A, Sabel C. 2000. After backyard environmentalism. Am. Behav. Sci. 44:4690–709 [Google Scholar]
  85. Kelemen R, Vogel D. 2010. Trading places: the role of the United States and the European Union in international environmental politics. Comp. Polit. Stud. 43:4427–56 [Google Scholar]
  86. Keynes JM. 1933. The Means to Prosperity London: Macmillan & Co. [Google Scholar]
  87. Kimani N. 2010. A collaborative approach to environmental governance in East Africa. J. Environ. Law. 22:127–57 [Google Scholar]
  88. KPMG 1996. Canadian Management Survey Toronto: KPMG [Google Scholar]
  89. Lazarus R. 2009. Super wicked problems and climate change: restraining the present to liberate the future. Cornell Law Rev. 94:1153–234 [Google Scholar]
  90. Lee J. 2013. “Can you hear me now?”: making participatory governance work for the poor. Harv. Law Policy Rev. 7:405–41 [Google Scholar]
  91. Levi-Faur D. 2005. The global diffusion of regulatory capitalism. Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 598:12–32 [Google Scholar]
  92. Lobel O. 2004. Setting the agenda for new governance research. Minn. Law Rev. 89:498–509 [Google Scholar]
  93. Macey G. 2013. The architecture of ignorance. Utah Law Rev. 6:1627–85 [Google Scholar]
  94. Maguire R. 2014. Designing REDD+ to be just: considerations for a legally binding instrument. Asian J. Int. Law 4:1169–96 [Google Scholar]
  95. Markell D, Glicksman R. 2014. A holistic look at agency enforcement. N. C. Law Rev. 93:1–76 [Google Scholar]
  96. Markell D, Glicksman R. 2015. Next Generation Compliance Public Law Res. Pap. No. 772, FSU Coll. Law, Tallahassee, FL [Google Scholar]
  97. Martin P, Gunningham N. 2011. Leading reform of natural resource management: core principles. Environ. Plan. Law J. 28:3137–58 [Google Scholar]
  98. McHenry MP. 2013. Technical and governance considerations for advanced metering infrastructure/smart meters: technology, security, uncertainty, costs, benefits, and risks. Energy Policy 59:834–42 [Google Scholar]
  99. McKibbin W, Wilcoxen P. 2002. The role of economics in climate change policy. J. Econ. Perspect. 16:2107–29 [Google Scholar]
  100. Metzenbaum S. 2015. Environmental Compliance and Enforcement Measurement: Why, What, and How? Presented at Penn Progr. Regul., Int. Expert Dialogue on “Defining and Measuring Regulatory Excellence,” Univ. Penn. Law School, Philadelphia [Google Scholar]
  101. Minneti J. 2010. Relational integrity regulation: nudging consumers toward products bearing valid environmental marketing claims. Environ. Law 40:1327–80 [Google Scholar]
  102. Mol A. 2007. Bringing the environmental state back. Partnerships, Governance and Sustainable Development P Glasbergen, F Biermann, A Mol 214–36 Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar [Google Scholar]
  103. Mol A, Sonnenfeld D. 2000. Ecological Modernisation Around the World London: Frank Cass [Google Scholar]
  104. Mukherjee S, Chakraborty D. 2015. Environmental Challenges and Governance: Diverse Perspectives from Asia London: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  105. Najam A, Papa M, Taiyab N. 2006. Global Environmental Governance: A Reform Agenda Winnipeg, Can: Int. Inst. Sustain. Dev. [Google Scholar]
  106. Natl. Database Environ. Manag. Syst 2003. Study concludes environmental management systems can boost performance, compliance. Public Rel., Eukalert, March 7 http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2003-03/uonc-sce030603.php [Google Scholar]
  107. Nourse V, Shaffer G. 2014. Empiricism, experimentalism, and conditional theory. South. Methodist Univ. Law Rev. 67:101–42 [Google Scholar]
  108. Organ. Econ. Co-op. Dev. (OECD) 2003. Voluntary Approaches for Environmental Policy: Effectiveness, Efficiency and Usage in Policy Mixes Paris: OECD Publ. [Google Scholar]
  109. Organ. Econ. Co-op. Dev. (OECD) 2013. The OECD Handbook for Fisheries Managers: Principles and Practice for Policy Design Paris: OECD Publ http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264191150-en [Google Scholar]
  110. O'Rourke D. 2000. Monitoring the Monitors: A Critique of PricewaterhouseCoopers (PWC) Labor Monitoring Cambridge, MA: Dep. Urban Stud. Plan., MIT [Google Scholar]
  111. Orts E. 1995. Reflexive environmental law. Northwest. Univ. Law Rev 89:1227–340 [Google Scholar]
  112. Osborne D, Gaebler T. 1993. Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit Is Transforming the Public Sector New York: Plume [Google Scholar]
  113. Ostrom E. 2010. Beyond markets and states: polycentric governance of complex economic systems. Am. Econ. Rev 100:641–72 [Google Scholar]
  114. Overdevest C, Zeitlin J. 2014. Assembling an experimentalist regime: transnational governance interactions in the forest sector. Regul. Gov 8:122–48 [Google Scholar]
  115. Øystein Saksvik P, Nytro K. 2005. Implementation of internal control of health, environment and safety in Norwegian enterprises Presented at Eur. Congr. Work Organ. Psychol. 7th, Gyor, Hungary [Google Scholar]
  116. Paddock LC, Wentz J. 2014. Next Generation Environmental Compliance Washington, DC: Environ. Law Inst. [Google Scholar]
  117. Parker C. 1999. The greenhouse challenge: Trivial pursuit?. Environ. Plan. Law J 16:163–74 [Google Scholar]
  118. Parker C. 2002. The Open Corporation: Effective Self-Regulation and Democracy Cambridge, UK: Camb. Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  119. Pattberg P, Widerberg O. 2015. Theorising global environmental governance: key findings and future questions. Millennium 43:3684–705 [Google Scholar]
  120. Pattberg P, Zelli F. 2016. Environmental Politics and Governance in the Anthropocene. Institutions and Legitimacy in a Complex World London: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  121. Perrings CA, Mäler KG, Folke C, Holling CS, Jansson BO. 1994. Biodiversity Conservation: Problems and Policies Dordrecht, Neth: Kluwer Acad. [Google Scholar]
  122. Porter M, van der Linde C. 1995. Green and competitive: ending the stalemate. Harv. Bus. Rev 73:5120–34 [Google Scholar]
  123. Potoski M, Prakash A. 2005. Covenants with weak swords: ISO 14001 and firms' environmental performance. J. Policy Anal. Manag 24:4745–69 [Google Scholar]
  124. Purdy R. 2011. Attitudes of UK and Australian farmers towards monitoring activity with satellite technologies: lessons to be learnt. Space Policy 27:202–12 [Google Scholar]
  125. Rayner J. 2015. The past and futures of governance studies from governance to meta-governance?. Varieties of Governance: Dynamics, Strategies, Capacities G Capano, M Howlett, M Ramesh 235–54 Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan [Google Scholar]
  126. Rhodes R. 1997. Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity, and Accountability Maidenhead, UK: Open Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  127. Sabel C, Fung A, Karkkainen B. 1999. Beyond backyard environmentalism: how communities are quietly refashioning environmental regulation. Boston Rev 24:5 [Google Scholar]
  128. Sabel C, Simon W. 2011. Minimalism and experimentalism in the administrative state. Georget. Law J 100:153–93 [Google Scholar]
  129. Scott JC. 2009. The Art of Not Being Governed New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  130. Scott K. 2011. International environmental governance: managing fragmentation through institutional connection. Melb. J. Int. Law 12:1177–216 [Google Scholar]
  131. Shulz K, Lueck D. 2015. Contracting for control of landscape-level resources. Iowa Law Rev. 100:2507–49 [Google Scholar]
  132. Slaughter A. 2004. A New World Order Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  133. Spapens T, White R, Huisman W. 2016. Environmental Crime in Transnational Context Farnham, UK: Ashgate [Google Scholar]
  134. Stavins R. 2005. Economics of the Environment: Selected Readings New York: W.W. Norton & Co. [Google Scholar]
  135. Stevenson H, Dryzek J. 2014. Democratizing Global Climate Governance New York: Camb. Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  136. Steurer R. 2013. Disentangling governance: a synoptic view of regulation by government, business and civil society. Policy Sci 46:387–410 [Google Scholar]
  137. Stewart R. 2001. A new generation of environmental regulation?. Capital Univ. Law Rev 29:21–182 [Google Scholar]
  138. Sunstein C. 1990. The paradoxes of regulation. Univ. Chic. Law Rev 57:2407–41 [Google Scholar]
  139. Sunstein C. 1999. Informational regulation and informational standing: Akins and beyond. Univ. Pa. Law Rev 147:613–75 [Google Scholar]
  140. Taylor C, Pollard S, Rocks S, Angus A. 2012. Selecting policy instruments for better environmental regulation: a critique and future research agenda. Environ. Policy Govern 22:268–92 [Google Scholar]
  141. Taylor C, Pollard S, Rocks S, Angus A. 2015. Better by design: business preferences for environmental regulatory reform. Sci. Total Environ 512–13:287–95 [Google Scholar]
  142. Tollefson C, Zito AR, Gale F. 2012. Symposium overview: conceptualizing new governance arrangements. Public Adm 9013–18 [Google Scholar]
  143. Trubek D, Trubek L. 2007. New governance & legal regulation. Columbia J. Eur. Law 13:3540–64 [Google Scholar]
  144. UN Environ. Progr. (UNEP) 2004. Economic Instruments in Biodiversity-Related Multilateral Environmental Agreements Nairobi, Kenya: UNEP http://www.unep.ch/etb/publication/EconInst/ecoInstBioMea.pdf [Google Scholar]
  145. UN Environ. Progr. (UNEP) 2012. Global Environment Outlook 5: Environment for the Future We Want Valletta, Malta: Progr. Press http://www.unep.org/geo/pdfs/geo5/GEO5_report_full_en.pdf [Google Scholar]
  146. US Environ. Prot. Agency (US EPA) 2015a. Carbon Pollution Standards for New, Modified and Reconstructed Power Plants Washington, DC: US EPA http://www.epa.gov/cleanpowerplan/carbon-pollution-standards-new-modified-and-reconstructed-power-plants [Google Scholar]
  147. US Environ. Prot. Agency (US EPA) 2015b. Next Generation Compliance Washington, DC: US EPA http://www.epa.gov/compliance/next-generation-compliance [Google Scholar]
  148. Van der Heijden J. 2013. Is new governance the silver bullet? Insights from the Australian buildings sector. Urban Policy Res 31:4453–71 [Google Scholar]
  149. Van der Heijden J. 2015. Regulatory failures, split-incentives, conflicting interests and a vicious circle of blame: The New Environmental Governance to the rescue?. J. Environ. Plan. Manag 58:61034–57 [Google Scholar]
  150. Vandenbergh M. 2013. Private environmental governance. Cornell Law Rev 99:129–99 [Google Scholar]
  151. Vogel D. 2005. The Market for Virtue: The Potential and Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility Washington, DC: Brookings Inst. Press [Google Scholar]
  152. Von der Porten S, de Loë R. 2013. Collaborative approaches to governance for water and indigenous peoples: a case study from British Columbia, Canada. Geoforum 50:149–60 [Google Scholar]
  153. Walker J, Howard S. 2002. Finding the Way Forward: How Could Voluntary Action Move Mining Towards Sustainable Development? London: Int. Inst. Environ Dev./World Bus. Counc. Sustain. Dev [Google Scholar]
  154. Webb K. 2004. Voluntary Codes: Private Governance, the Public Interest and Innovation Montreal: Carlton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  155. Wylie SA, Jalbert K, Dosemagen S, Ratto M. 2014. Institutions for civic technoscience: how critical making is transforming environmental research. Inf. Soc. Int. J 30:2116–26 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110615-084651
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error