Sociolegal Approaches to the Study of Guilty Pleas and Prosecution

Literature Cited

1. Abrams DS. 2011. Is pleading really a bargain?. J. Empir. Leg. Stud. 8:1200–21 [Google Scholar]
2. Albonetti CA. 1986. Criminality, prosecutorial screening, and uncertainty: toward a theory of discretionary decision-making in felony case processings. Criminology 24:623–44 [Google Scholar]
3. Albonetti CA. 1987. Prosecutorial discretion: the effects of uncertainty. Law Soc. Rev. 21:2291–314 [Google Scholar]
4. Albonetti CA. 1990. Race and the probability of pleading guilty. J. Quant. Criminol. 6:3315–34 [Google Scholar]
5. Albonetti CA. 1991. An integration of theories to explain judicial discretion. Soc. Probl. 38:2247–66 [Google Scholar]
6. Albonetti CA, Hepburn J. 1996. Prosecutorial discretion to defer criminalization: the effects of defendant's ascribed and achieved status characteristics. J. Quant. Criminol. 12:163–81 [Google Scholar]
7. Alschuler AW. 1968. The prosecutor's role in plea bargaining. Univ. Chicago Law Rev. 36:50–112 [Google Scholar]
8. Alschuler AW. 1976. The trial judge's role in plea bargaining, part I. Columbia Law Rev 76:1059–154 [Google Scholar]
9. Alschuler AW. 1979. Plea bargaining and its history. Law Soc. Rev. 13:211–45 [Google Scholar]
10. Alschuler AW. 1981. The changing plea bargaining debate. Calif. Law Rev. 69:3652–730 [Google Scholar]
11. Am. Law Inst 1934. A Study of the Business of Federal Courts Philadelphia: Am. Law Inst. [Google Scholar]
12. Bandyopadhyay S, McCannon BC. 2014. The effect of the election of prosecutors on criminal trials. Public Choice 161:141–56 [Google Scholar]
13. Beattie JM. 1986. Crime and the Courts in England, 1660–1800 Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
14. Bibas S. 2001. Judicial fact-finding and sentence enhancements in a world of guilty pleas. Yale Law J 110:1097–187 [Google Scholar]
15. Bibas S. 2004. Plea bargaining outside the shadow of trial. Harvard Law Rev 117:2463–547 [Google Scholar]
16. Bordens KS. 1984. The effects of likelihood of conviction, threatened punishment, and assumed role on mock plea bargaining decisions. Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 5:159–74 [Google Scholar]
17. Brennan P. 2006. Sentencing female misdemeanants: an examination of the direct and indirect effects of race/ethnicity. Justice Q 23:160–95 [Google Scholar]
18. Burke A. 2006. Improving prosecutorial decision making: some lessons of cognitive science. William Mary Law Rev 47:1587–633 [Google Scholar]
19. Bushway SD, Redlich AD. 2012. Is plea bargaining in the “shadow of the trial” a mirage?. J. Quant. Criminol. 28:437–54 [Google Scholar]
20. Bushway SD, Redlich AD, Norris RJ. 2014. An explicit test of plea bargaining in the “shadow of the trial.”. Criminology 52:723–54 [Google Scholar]
21. Coffee JC, Tonry M. 1983. Hard choices: critical trade-offs in the implementation of sentencing reform through guidelines. Reform and Punishment: Essays on Criminal Sentencing M Tonry, F Zimring, pp. 155–203 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
22. Covey R. 2007. Reconsidering the relationship between cognitive psychology and plea bargaining. Marquette Law Rev 91:213–47 [Google Scholar]
23. Dervan LE, Edkins VA. 2013. The innocent defendant's dilemma: an innovative empirical study of plea bargaining's innocence problem. J. Crim. Law Criminol. 103:1–48 [Google Scholar]
24. Dixon J. 1995. The organizational context of criminal sentencing. Am. J. Sociol. 100:1157–98 [Google Scholar]
25. Eisenstein J, Flemming R, Nardulli P. 1988. The Contours of Justice: Communities and Their Courts Boston: Little, Brown [Google Scholar]
26. Eisenstein J, Jacob H. 1977. Felony Justice: An Organizational Analysis of Criminal Courts Boston: Little, Brown [Google Scholar]
27. Emmelman DS. 1996. Trial by plea bargain: case settlement as a product of recursive decisionmaking. Law Soc. Rev. 30:335–60 [Google Scholar]
28. Feeley MM. 1979 [1992]. The Process Is the Punishment: Handling Cases in a Lower Criminal Court New York: Russell Sage Found. [Google Scholar]
29. Forst B. 1999 [2002]. Prosecution. Crime: Public Policies for Crime Control JQ Wilson, J Petersilia, pp. 509–36 Oakland, CA: ICS Press [Google Scholar]
30. Franklin TW. 2010a. The intersection of defendants' race, gender, and age in prosecutorial decision making. J. Crim. Justice 38:2185–92 [Google Scholar]
31. Franklin TW. 2010b. Community influence on prosecutorial dismissals: a multilevel analysis of case-and county-level factors. J. Crim. Justice 38:4693–701 [Google Scholar]
32. Frase RS. 2000. Is guided discretion sufficient? Overview of the state sentencing guidelines. St. Louis Univ. Law J. 44:425–49 [Google Scholar]
33. Frederick B, Stemen D. 2012. The anatomy of discretion: an analysis of prosecutorial decision making. Tech. Rep., Vera Inst. Justice, New York [Google Scholar]
34. Frenzel ED, Ball JD. 2008. Effects of individual characteristics on plea negotiations under sentencing guidelines. J. Ethn. Crim. Justice 5:459–82 [Google Scholar]
35. Friedman LM. 1979. Plea bargaining in historical perspective. Law Soc. Rev. 13:247–59 [Google Scholar]
36. Friedman LM, Percival RV. 1981. The Roots of Justice: Crime and Punishment in Alameda County, California, 1870–1910 Chapel Hill: Univ. N.C. Press [Google Scholar]
37. Frohmann L. 1997. Convictability and discordant locales: reproducing race, class, and gender ideologies in prosecutorial decision-making. Law Soc. Rev. 31:531–55 [Google Scholar]
38. Garrett BL. 2010. The substance of false confessions. Stanford Law Rev. 62:41051–119 [Google Scholar]
39. Gifford DG. 1983. Meaningful reform of plea bargaining: the control of prosecutorial discretion. Univ. Ill. Law Rev. 37:90–92 [Google Scholar]
40. Gottfredson MR, Gottfredson DM. 1988. Decision Making in Criminal Justice 3 New York: Plenum [Google Scholar]
41. Graham K. 2012. Crimes, widgets, and plea bargaining: an analysis of charge content, pleas, and trials. Calif. Law Rev. 100:6573–711 [Google Scholar]
42. Hagan J. 1974. Parameters of criminal prosecution: an application of path analysis to a problem of criminal justice. J. Crim. Law Criminol. 65:4536–44 [Google Scholar]
43. Hartley R, Maddan S, Spohn C. 2007. Concerning conceptualization and operationalization: sentencing data and the focal concerns perspective—a research note. South. J. Crim. Justice 4:158–78 [Google Scholar]
44. Heumann M. 1978. Plea Bargaining: The Experiences of Prosecutors, Judges, and Defense Attorneys Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
45. Hogarth J. 1971. Sentencing as a Human Process Toronto, Can: Univ. Tor. Press [Google Scholar]
46. Holleran D, Beichner D, Spohn C. 2010. Examining charging agreement between police and prosecutors in rape cases. Crime Delinq. 56:3385–413 [Google Scholar]
47. Holmes MD, Daudistel HC, Farrell RA. 1987. Determinants of charge reductions and final dispositions in cases of burglary and robbery. J. Res. Crime Delinq. 24:3233–54 [Google Scholar]
48. Innocence Proj 2015. The Causes of Wrongful Conviction http://www.innocenceproject.org/causes-wrong ful-conviction [Google Scholar]
49. Jackson RH. 1940. The federal prosecutor Speech delivered at 2nd Annu. Conf. US Atty., Washington, DC [Google Scholar]
50. Johnson BD. 2003. Racial and ethnic disparities in sentencing departures across modes of conviction. Criminology 41:449–90 [Google Scholar]
51. Johnson BD. 2014. The Missing Link: Examining Prosecutorial Decision-Making across Federal District Courts Washington, DC: Natl. Inst. Justice. Doc. No. 245351. Award No. 2010-IJ-CX-0012 [Google Scholar]
52. Jolls C, Sunstein CR, Thaler R. 1998. A behavioral approach to law and economics. Stanford Law Rev. 50:1471–550 [Google Scholar]
53. Jones JB. 1978. Prosecutors and the disposition of criminal cases: an analysis of plea bargaining rates. J. Crim. Law Criminol. 69:3402–12 [Google Scholar]
54. Kingsnorth R, Lopez J, Wentworth J, Cummings D. 1998. Adult sexual assault: the role of racial/ethnic composition in prosecution and sentencing. J. Crim. Justice 26:359–71 [Google Scholar]
55. Kingsnorth R, MacIntosh RC. 2007. Intimate partner violence: the role of suspect gender in prosecutorial decision-making. Justice Q. 24:3460–95 [Google Scholar]
56. Kingsnorth R, MacIntosh RC, Sutherland S. 2002. Criminal charge or probation violation? Prosecutorial discretion and implications for research in criminal court processing. Criminology 40:3553–77 [Google Scholar]
57. Kingsnorth R, MacIntosh RC, Wentworth J. 1999. Sexual assault: the role of prior relationship and victim characteristics in case processing. Justice Q. 16:2275–302 [Google Scholar]
58. Kutateladze BL, Andiloro NR, Johnson BD, Spohn C. 2014. Cumulative disadvantage: examining racial and ethnic disparity in prosecution and sentencing. Criminology 52:514–51 [Google Scholar]
59. Kutateladze BL, Lawson VZ, Andiloro NR. 2015. Does evidence really matter? An exploratory analysis of the role of evidence in plea bargaining in felony drug cases. Law Hum. Behav. 39:5431–42 [Google Scholar]
60. Kutateladze BL, Lynn V, Liang E. 2012. Do Race and Ethnicity Matter in Prosecution? A Review of Empirical Studies New York: Vera Inst. Justice [Google Scholar]
61. LaFree GD. 1985. Adversarial and nonadversarial justice: a comparison of guilty pleas and trials. Criminology 23:2289–312 [Google Scholar]
62. Landes WM. 1971. An economic analysis of the courts. J. Law Econ. 14:161–108 [Google Scholar]
63. Langbein JH. 2003. The Origins of Adversary Criminal Trial Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
64. March JG, Simon HA. 1958. Organizations New York: Wiley [Google Scholar]
65. McCannon BC. 2013. Prosecutor elections, mistakes, and appeals. J. Empir. Leg. Stud. 10:4696–714 [Google Scholar]
66. McConville M, Mirsky CL. 2005. Jury Trials and Plea Bargaining: A True History Oxford, UK: Hart [Google Scholar]
67. McDonald W. 1979. The prosecutor's domain. The Prosecutor WF McDonald 15–50 Beverly Hills, CA: Sage [Google Scholar]
68. Miethe T. 1987. Charging and plea bargaining under determinant sentencing: an investigation of the hydraulic displacement of discretion. J. Crim. Law Criminol. 78:155–76 [Google Scholar]
69. Miller HS, McDonald W, Cramer JA. 1978. Plea Bargaining in the United States Washington, DC: Georget. Univ. Law Cent http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07775.v1 [Google Scholar]
70. Missouri v. Frye 56 U.S. ___ 2012.
71. Mnookin RH, Kornhauser L. 1979. Bargaining in the shadow of the law: the case of divorce. Yale Law J. 88:950–97 [Google Scholar]
72. Moley R. 1928. The vanishing jury. South. Calif. Law Rev. 2:97–127 [Google Scholar]
73. Moley R. 1929. The municipal court of Chicago. The Illinois Crime Survey JH Wigmore, pp. 393–419 Chicago: Ill. Assoc. Crim. Justice [Google Scholar]
74. Nardulli PF, Eisenstein J, Flemming RB. 1988. The Tenor of Justice: Criminal Courts and the Guilty Plea Process Champaign: Univ. Ill. Press [Google Scholar]
75. Nardulli PF, Flemming RB, Eisenstein J. 1985. Criminal courts and bureaucratic justice: concessions and consensus in the guilty plea process. J. Crim. Law Criminol. 76:41103–131 [Google Scholar]
76. Piehl AM, Bushway SD. 2007. Measuring and explaining charge bargaining. J. Quant. Criminol. 23:105–25 [Google Scholar]
77. Rachlinski JJ, Johnson SL, Wistrich AJ, Guthrie C. 2009. Does unconscious racial bias affect trial judges?. Notre Dame Law Rev 84:31195–246 [Google Scholar]
78. Rakoff JS. 2014. Why innocent people plead guilty. The New York Review of Books Nov. 20. http://www.nybooks.com/articles/2014/11/20/why-innocent-people-plead-guilty/ [Google Scholar]
79. Reaves BA. 2013. Felony Defendants in Large Urban Counties, 2009 Statistical Tables Washington, DC: US Dep. Justice, Bur. Justice Stat. [Google Scholar]
80. Redlich AD. 2010. False confessions, false guilty pleas: similarities and differences. Interrogations and Confessions: Current Research, Practice, and Policy GD Lassiter, C Meissner 49–66 Washington, DC: APA Books [Google Scholar]
81. Redlich AD, Summers A. 2012. Voluntary, knowing, and intelligent pleas: understanding plea inquiries. Psychol. Public Policy Law 18:626–43 [Google Scholar]
82. Redlich AD, Summers A, Hoover S. 2010. Self-reported false confessions and false guilty pleas among offenders with mental illness. Law Hum. Behav. 34:79–90 [Google Scholar]
83. Rehavi MM, Starr SB. 2014. Racial disparity in federal criminal sentences. J. Polit. Econ. 122:61320–54 [Google Scholar]
84. Santobello v. New York 404 U.S. 260 1971.
85. Schulhofer SJ. 1988. Criminal justice discretion as a regulatory system. J. Leg. Stud. 17:143–82 [Google Scholar]
86. Schulhofer SJ. 1992. Plea bargaining as disaster. Yale Law J 101:81979–2010 [Google Scholar]
87. Scott RE, Stuntz WJ. 1992. Plea bargaining as contract. Yale Law J 101:81909–68 [Google Scholar]
88. Shermer LO, Johnson BD. 2010. Criminal prosecutions: examining prosecutorial discretion and charge reductions in U.S. federal district courts. Justice Q 27:3394–430 [Google Scholar]
89. Smith BP. 2005. Plea bargaining and the eclipse of the jury. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 1:131–49 [Google Scholar]
90. Smith DA. 1986. The plea bargaining controversy. J. Crim. Law Criminol. 77:949–68 [Google Scholar]
91. Smith RJ, Levinson JD. 2012. Impact of implicit racial bias on the exercise of prosecutorial discretion. Seattle Univ. Law Rev. 35:795–826 [Google Scholar]
92. Spears J, Spohn C. 1997. The effect of evidence factors and victim characteristics on prosecutors' charging decisions in sexual assault cases. Justice Q 14:3501–24 [Google Scholar]
93. Spohn C, Beichner D, Davis-Frenzel E. 2001. Prosecutorial justifications for sexual assault case rejection: guarding the “gateway to justice.”. Soc. Probl. 48:2206–35 [Google Scholar]
94. Spohn C, Gruhl J, Welch S. 1987. The impact of the ethnicity and gender of defendants on the decision to reject or dismiss felony charges. Criminology 35:175–90 [Google Scholar]
95. Spohn C, Spears J. 1996. The effect of offender and victim characteristics on sexual assault case processing decisions. Justice Q. 13:4649–79 [Google Scholar]
96. Spohn C, Tellis K. 2014. Policing and Prosecuting Sexual Assault: Inside the Criminal Justice System Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner [Google Scholar]
97. Steffensmeier D, Ulmer J, Kramer J. 1998. Interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: the punishment cost of being young, black, and male. Criminology 36:763–98 [Google Scholar]
98. Stemen D, Escobar G. 2015. The effects of prosecutorial charging decisions on case outcomes. Presented at Am. Soc. Criminol. Meet., Washington, DC [Google Scholar]
99. Stolzenberg L, D'Alessio SJ, Eitle D. 2013. Race and cumulative discrimination in the prosecution of criminal defendants. Race Justice 3:4275–99 [Google Scholar]
100. Stuntz WJ. 2004. Plea bargaining and criminal law's disappearing shadow. Harvard Law Rev. 117:2548–69 [Google Scholar]
101. Sudnow D. 1965. Normal crimes: sociological features of the penal code in a public defender office. Soc. Probl. 12:255–76 [Google Scholar]
102. Sutton JR. 2013. Structural bias in the sentencing of felony defendants. Soc. Sci. Res. 42:51207–21 [Google Scholar]
103. The Economist. 2014. The kings of the courtroom: how prosecutors came to dominate the criminal-justice system. The Economist Oct 4. http://www.economist.com/news/united-states/21621799-how-prosecutors-came-dominate-criminal-justice-system-kings-courtroom [Google Scholar]
104. Tversky A, Kahneman D. 1974. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185:41571124–31 [Google Scholar]
105. Ulmer JT, Eisenstein J, Johnson BD. 2010. Trial penalties in federal sentencing: extra-guidelines factors and district variation. Justice Q. 27:4560–92 [Google Scholar]
106. Ulmer JT, Johnson BD. 2004. Sentencing in context: a multilevel analysis. Criminology 42:137–78 [Google Scholar]
107. United States v. Jackson 390 U.S. 570 1968.
108. Vance SE, Oleson JC. 2013. Displaced discretion: the effects of sentencing guidelines on prosecutors' charge bargaining in the District of Columbia Superior Court. Crim. Justice Policy Rev. 25:3347–77 [Google Scholar]
109. Vogel ME. 1999. The social origins of plea bargaining: conflict and the law in the process of state formation, 1830–1860. Law Soc. Rev. 33:1161–246 [Google Scholar]
110. Vogel ME. 2005. Pleas bargaining, discretionary leniency and the making of political authority. Amic. Curiae 57:2–11 [Google Scholar]
111. Wickersham Comm. (Natl. Comm. Law Obs. Enforc.) 1931. Prosecution Washington, DC: US Gov. Print. Off. [Google Scholar]
112. Wooldredge JD. 1989. An aggregate-level examination of the caseload pressure hypothesis. J. Quant. Criminol. 5:3259–83 [Google Scholar]
113. Wooldredge JD, Griffin T. 2005. Displaced discretion under Ohio sentencing guidelines. J. Crim. Justice 33:301–16 [Google Scholar]
114. Wright R, Engen R. 2006. The effects of depth and distance in a criminal code on charging, sentencing, and prosecutor power. N.C. Law Rev. 84:61935–82 [Google Scholar]