Field Research on Law in Conflict Zones and Authoritarian States

Literature Cited

1. Abel RL. 2010. Law and society: project and practice. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 6:1–23 [Google Scholar]
2. Abel RL, Lewis PSC. 1996. Lawyers in Society: An Overview Oakland: Univ. Calif. Press [Google Scholar]
3. Abusharaf RM. 2009. Transforming Displaced Women in Sudan: Politics and the Body in a Squatter Settlement Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
4. Amar P. 2013. The Security Archipelago: Human-Security States, Sexuality Politics, and the End of Neoliberalism Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
5. Baldwin J, Davis G. 2005. Empirical research in law. The Oxford Handbook of Legal Studies M Tushnet, P Cane 880–900 Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
6. Bartels BL, Bonneau CW. 2015. Making Law and Courts Research Relevant: The Normative Implications of Empirical Research New York: Routledge [Google Scholar]
7. Blanck PD. 1987. The “process” of field research in the courtroom: a descriptive analysis. Law Hum. Behav. 11:4337–58 [Google Scholar]
8. Blatmann C. 2015. Political scientists are debating a new initiative to make research more trustworthy. Here's why I'm skeptical. Washington Post Monkey Cage Blog Nov. 9. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2015/11/09/political-scientists-are-debating-a-new-initiative-to-make-research-more-trustworthy-heres-why-im-skeptical/ [Google Scholar]
9. Bleich E, Pekkanan R. 2013. How to report interview data. Interview Research in Political Science L Mosley 84–108 Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
10. Boittin ML. 2013. New perspectives from the oldest profession: abuse and the legal consciousness of sex workers in China. Law Soc. Rev. 47:2245–78 [Google Scholar]
11. Borneman J, Hammoudi A. 2009. Being There: The Fieldwork Encounter and the Making of Truth Oakland: Univ. Calif. Press [Google Scholar]
12. Bradney A. 2010. The place of empirical legal research in the law school curriculum. See Cane & Kritzer 2010 1025–43
13. Brady HE, Collier D. 2010. Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2nd ed.. [Google Scholar]
14. Branch A. 2011. Displacing Human Rights: War and Intervention in Northern Uganda Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
15. Brinks DM. 2008. The Judicial Response to Police Killings in Latin America: Inequality and the Rule of Law Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
16. Brisbin RA Jr. 2010. Resistance to legality. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 6:25–44 [Google Scholar]
17. Cane P, Kritzer HM. 2010. The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
18. Carbado DW, Roithmayr D. 2014. Critical race theory meets social science. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 10:149–67 [Google Scholar]
19. Cassell J. 1978. Risk and benefit to subjects of fieldwork. Am. Sociol. 13:3134–43 [Google Scholar]
20. Chakravarty A. 2012. “Partially trusting” field relationships opportunities and constraints of fieldwork in Rwanda's postconflict setting. Field Methods 24:3251–71 [Google Scholar]
21. Cheesman N. 2015. Opposing the Rule of Law: How Myanmar's Courts Make Law and Order Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
22. Christodulou Family 2016. Artemis Christodulou http://www.socialentrepreneurship-book.com/beneficiaries/artemis-christodulou/ [Google Scholar]
23. Chua LJ. 2012. Pragmatic resistance, law, and social movements in authoritarian states: the case of gay collective action in Singapore. Law Soc. Rev. 46:4713–48 [Google Scholar]
24. Chua LJ. 2014a. Mobilizing Gay Singapore: Rights and Resistance in an Authoritarian State Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
25. Chua LJ. 2014b. Rights mobilization and the campaign to decriminalize homosexuality in Singapore. Asian J. Law Soc. 1:1205–28 [Google Scholar]
26. Clark JN. 2012. Fieldwork and its ethical challenges: reflections from research in Bosnia. Hum. Rights Q. 34:3823–39 [Google Scholar]
27. Clifford J. 1983. On ethnographic authority. Representations 1:2118–46 [Google Scholar]
28. Clifford J, Marcus GE. 1986. Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography Oakland: Univ. Calif. Press [Google Scholar]
29. Cohen N, Arieli T. 2011. Field research in conflict environments: methodological challenges and snowball sampling. J. Peace Res. 48:4423–35 [Google Scholar]
30. Cramer C, Johnston D, Oya C, Sender J. 2016. Research note: mistakes, crises, and research independence: the perils of fieldwork as a form of evidence. Afr. Aff. 115:458145–60 [Google Scholar]
31. de Sousa Santos B. 1981. Science and politics: doing research in Rio's squatter settlements. Law and Social Enquiry: Case Studies of Research R Luckham 261–89 Uppsala, Swed: Scand. Inst. Afr. Stud. Int. Cent. Law Dev. [Google Scholar]
32. Dezalay Y, Garth BG. 1996. Dealing in Virtue: International Commercial Arbitration and the Construction of a Transnational Legal Order Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
33. Dezalay Y, Garth BG. 2002. The Internationalization of Palace Wars: Lawyers, Economists, and the Contest to Transform Latin American States Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
34. Dezalay Y, Garth BG. 2010. Asian Legal Revivals: Lawyers in the Shadow of Empire Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
35. Diamond SS, Mueller P. 2010. Empirical legal scholarship in law reviews. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 6:581–99 [Google Scholar]
36. Ellett RL. 2011. Stuck in-between: interviewing judges and other legal elites in Africa. Law Court 21:113–18 [Google Scholar]
37. Ellett RL. 2016. Interviewing African judges: reflections on fieldwork and data collection in comparative judicial politics Presented at Am. Polit. Sci. Assoc. Annu. Meet., Sept 3–6 San Francisco, CA: [Google Scholar]
38. Ellett R, Massoud MF. 2016. Not all law is public: reflections on data transparency for law and courts research in Africa. Afr. Polit. Conf. Group Newsl. 12:28–10 [Google Scholar]
39. Englund H. 2004. Towards a critique of rights talk in new democracies: the case of legal aid in Malawi. Discourse Soc 15:5527–51 [Google Scholar]
40. Englund H. 2006. Prisoners of Freedom: Human Rights and the African Poor Oakland: Univ. Calif. Press [Google Scholar]
41. Epstein L, King G. 2002. The rules of inference. Univ. Chicago Law Rev. 69:11–93 [Google Scholar]
42. Epstein L, Martin AD. 2010. Quantitative approaches to empirical legal research. See Cane & Kritzer 2010 901–25
43. Erie MS. 2015. Muslim Mandarins in Chinese courts: dispute resolution, Islamic law, and the secular state in northwest China. Law Soc. Inq. 40:41001–30 [Google Scholar]
44. Erie MS. 2016. China and Islam: The Prophet, The Party, and Law Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
45. Esbrook L. 2015. Field research on Turkish judicial reform. Politics and Law in Law Turkey Blog https://politicsandlawinturkey.wordpress.com/publications/talking-about-research/hosgeldin-welcome-and-goodbye-field-research-on-turkish-judicial-reform/ [Google Scholar]
46. Felstiner WLF, Abel RL, Sarat A. 1980. The emergence and transformation of disputes: naming, blaming, claiming. Law Soc. Rev. 15:3/4631–54 [Google Scholar]
47. Fluehr-Lobban C. 1987. Islamic Law and Society in the Sudan London: Frank Cass [Google Scholar]
48. Ford N, Mills EJ, Zachariah R, Upshur R. 2009. Ethics of conducting research in conflict settings. Confl. Health 3:71–9 [Google Scholar]
49. Fuller LL. 1969. The Morality of Law New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press, Rev. ed.. [Google Scholar]
50. Furman KC, Lake M. 2015. Ethics abroad: field research in fragile states Presented at Am. Polit. Sci. Assoc. Annu. Meet., Sept 3–6 San Francisco, CA: [Google Scholar]
51. Galligan DJ. 2010. Legal theory and empirical research. See Cane & Kritzer 2010 976–1001
52. Galtung J. 1969. Violence, peace, and peace research. J. Peace Res. 6:3167–91 [Google Scholar]
53. Galtung J. 1990. Cultural violence. J. Peace Res. 27:3291–305 [Google Scholar]
54. Gans-Morse J. 2012. Threats to property rights in Russia: from private coercion to state aggression. Post-Soviet Aff 28:3263–95 [Google Scholar]
55. Gentile M. 2013. Meeting the “organs”: the tacit dilemma of field research in authoritarian states. Area 45:4426–32 [Google Scholar]
56. Geraghty TF. 1970. Field research in Ethiopian law. J. Leg. Plur. Unoff. Law 2:317–22 [Google Scholar]
57. Goffman A. 2014. On the Run: Fugitive Life in an American City Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
58. Golder M, Golder SN. 2016. Letter from the editors: symposium on DA-RT. Comp. Polit. Newsl. 26:11–9 [Google Scholar]
59. Goodale M, Merry SE. 2007. The Practice of Human Rights Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
60. Green DP, Thorley DR. 2014. Field experimentation and the study of law and policy. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 10:153–72 [Google Scholar]
61. Greenhouse CJ. 2006. Fieldwork on law. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 2:187–210 [Google Scholar]
62. Greitens SC. 2015. Field research under authoritarianism: how ethics should shape methodology Presented at Am. Polit. Sci. Assoc. Annu. Meet., Sept 3–6 San Francisco, CA: [Google Scholar]
63. Grenfell L. 2013. Promoting the Rule of Law in Post-Conflict States Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
64. Halliday S, Schmidt P. 2009. Conducting Law and Society Research: Reflections on Methods and Practices Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
65. Handler JF. 1970. Field research strategies in urban legal studies. Osgoode Hall Law J 8:2401–9 [Google Scholar]
66. Hanson M. 2016. Legalized rent-seeking: local government, law, and land rights in Kazakhstan Presented at Cornell Int. Law J. Sympos., Feb. 19 Ithaca, NY: [Google Scholar]
67. Harrington CB, Merry SE. 2010. Empirical Legal Training in the U.S. Academy. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
68. Heimer CA, Morse J. 2016. Colonizing the clinic: the adventures of law in HIV treatment and research. The New Legal Realism, Volume II: Studying Law Globally H Klug, SE Merry 69–95 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
69. Heimer CA, Petty J. 2010. Bureaucratic ethics: IRBs and the legal regulation of human subjects research. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 6:601–26 [Google Scholar]
70. Hirsch SF. 2006. In the Moment of Greatest Calamity: Terrorism, Grief, and a Victim's Quest for Justice Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
71. Ho DE, Rubin DB. 2011. Credible causal inference for empirical legal studies. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 7:17–40 [Google Scholar]
72. Ho EL-E, Chua LJ. 2016. Law and “race” in the citizenship spaces of Myanmar: spatial strategies and the political subjectivity of the Burmese-Chinese. Ethn. Racial Stud. 39:5896–916 [Google Scholar]
73. Huntington SP, Moore CH. 1970. Authoritarian Politics in Modern Society: The Dynamics of Established One-Party Systems New York: Basic Books [Google Scholar]
74. Isaac JC. 2015. For a more public political science. Perspect. Polit. 13:2269–83 [Google Scholar]
75. Isser D. 2011. Customary Justice and the Rule of Law in War-Torn Societies Washington, DC: US Inst. Peace Press [Google Scholar]
76. Kapiszewski D, Maclean L, Read BL. 2015. Field Research in Political Science Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
77. Karpik L, Halliday TC. 2011. The legal complex. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 7:217–36 [Google Scholar]
78. Kawar L, Massoud MF. 2012. Symposium: new directions in comparative public law. Law Court 22:332–36 [Google Scholar]
79. Kilson ML. 1963. Authoritarian and single-party tendencies in African politics. World Polit 15:2262–94 [Google Scholar]
80. King G, Keohane RO, Verba S. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
81. Kiser E, Hechter M. 1991. The role of general theory in comparative-historical sociology. Am. J. Sociol. 97:11–30 [Google Scholar]
82. Kleinfeld R. 2012. Advancing the Rule of Law Abroad: Next Generation Reform New York: Carnegie Endow. Int. Peace [Google Scholar]
83. Klug H, Merry SE. 2016. The New Legal Realism: Studying Law Globally 2 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
84. Koch N. 2013. Introduction—field methods in “closed contexts”: undertaking research in authoritarian states and places. Area 45:4390–95 [Google Scholar]
85. Korobkin R. 2002. Empirical scholarship in contract law: possibilities and pitfalls. Univ. Ill. Law Rev. 2002:41033–66 [Google Scholar]
86. Kritzer HM. 1996. “Data, data, data, drowning in data”: crafting “the hollow core.”. Law Soc. Inq. 21:3761–804 [Google Scholar]
87. Kritzer HM. 2009. Conclusion: “Research is a messy business”—an archeology of the craft of sociolegal research. Conducting Law and Society Research: Reflections on Methods and Practices S Halliday, P Schmidt 264–85 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
88. Kritzer HM. 2010. The (nearly) forgotten early empirical legal research. See Cane & Kritzer 2010 886–900
89. Krygier M. 2008. The Hart-Fuller debate, transnational societies, and the rule of law. The Hart-Fuller Debate in the 21st Century P Cane 107–34 Oxford: Hart [Google Scholar]
90. Lake M. 2014. Organizing hypocrisy: providing legal accountability for human rights violations in areas of limited statehood. Int. Stud. Q. 58:3515–26 [Google Scholar]
91. Lake M, Muthaka I, Walker G. 2016. Gendering justice? Opportunity and (dis)empowerment through legal development aid in the Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. Law Soc. Rev. 50:539–74 [Google Scholar]
92. Ledeneva AV. 2013. Can Russia Modernise? Sistema, Power Networks and Informal Governance Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
93. Leonardi C. 2013. Dealing with Government in South Sudan: Histories of Chiefship, Community & State Suffolk, UK: James Currey [Google Scholar]
94. Levitsky S, Way LA. 2010. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
95. Lokaneeta J. 2014. Transnational Torture: Law, Violence, and State Power in the United States and India New York: N.Y. Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
96. Luker K. 2008. Salsa Dancing into the Social Sciences: Research in the Age of Info-Glut Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
97. Lupia A, Elman C. 2014. Openness in political science: data access and research transparency. PS Polit. Sci. Polit. 47:119–42 [Google Scholar]
98. Lyon TD. 2014. Interviewing children. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 10:73–89 [Google Scholar]
99. Massoud MF. 2011. Do victims of war need international law? Human rights education programs in authoritarian Sudan. Law Soc. Rev. 45:11–32 [Google Scholar]
100. Massoud MF. 2012. Lawyers and the disintegration of the legal complex in Sudan. Fates of Political Liberalism in the British Post-Colony: The Politics of the Legal Complex T Halliday, L Karpik, MM Feeley 193–218 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
101. Massoud MF. 2013. Law's Fragile State: Colonial, Authoritarian, and Humanitarian Legacies in Sudan Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
102. Massoud MF. 2014. International arbitration and judicial politics in authoritarian states. Law Soc. Inq. 39:11–30 [Google Scholar]
103. Massoud MF. 2015. Work rules: how international NGOs build law in war-torn societies. Law Soc. Rev. 49:2333–64 [Google Scholar]
104. Massoud MF. 2016a. Ideals and practices in the rule of law: an essay on legal politics. Law Soc. Inq. 41:2489–501 [Google Scholar]
105. Massoud MF. 2016b. The politics of Islamic law and human rights: Sudan's rival legal systems. The New Legal Realism: Studying Law Globally 2 H Klug, SE Merry, pp 96–112 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
106. Mawani R. 2012. Law's archive. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 8:337–65 [Google Scholar]
107. Mazurana D, Jacobsen K, Gale LA. 2013. Research Methods in Conflict Settings: A View from Below Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
108. Merry SE. 2006. Human Rights and Gender Violence: Translating International Law into Local Justice Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
109. Mertz E, Macaulay S, Mitchell TW. 2016. The New Legal Realism: Translating Law-and-Society for Today's Legal Practice 1 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
110. Moore B. 1966. Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy Boston: Beacon [Google Scholar]
111. Moustafa T. 2014. Law and courts in authoritarian regimes. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 10:281–99 [Google Scholar]
112. Mutua M. 2008. Human Rights: A Political and Cultural Critique Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press [Google Scholar]
113. Nielsen LB. 2010. The need for multi-method approaches in empirical legal research. See Cane & Kritzer 2010 952–75
114. Nixon R. 2011. Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
115. Nonet P, Selznick P. 2001. Law & Society in Transition: Toward Responsive Law New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction [Google Scholar]
116. Nordstrom C. 2002. Four ways to tell a story on violence. Rev. Anthropol. 31:11–19 [Google Scholar]
117. Nordstrom C, Robben ACGM. 1996. Fieldwork under Fire: Contemporary Stories of Violence and Culture Oakland: Univ. Calif. Press [Google Scholar]
118. Nouwen SMH. 2013. Complementarity in the Line of Fire: The Catalysing Effect of the International Criminal Court in Uganda and Sudan Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
119. Osanloo A. 2004. Doing the “rights” thing: methods and challenges of fieldwork in Iran. Iran. Stud. 37:4675–84 [Google Scholar]
120. Pils E. 2015. China's Human Rights Lawyers: Advocacy and Resistance London: Routledge [Google Scholar]
121. Portillo S, Rudes DS. 2014. Construction of justice at the street level. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 10:321–34 [Google Scholar]
122. Pyper N. 2016. The murder of my friend Giulio Regeni in Egypt was an attack on academic freedom. The Guardian Feb. 6. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/feb/06/murder-giulio-regeni-egypt-academic-freedom-students [Google Scholar]
123. Rajagopal B. 2003. International Law from Below: Development, Social Movements, and Third World Resistance Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
124. Rajah J. 2011. Punishing bodies, securing the nation: how rule of law can legitimate the urbane authoritarian state. Law Soc. Inq. 36:4945–70 [Google Scholar]
125. Rajah J. 2012. Authoritarian Rule of Law: Legislation, Discourse and Legitimacy in Singapore Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
126. Read BL. 2010. More than an interview, less than Sedaka: studying subtle and hidden politics with site-intensive methods. Contemporary Chinese Politics: New Sources, Methods, and Field Strategies A Carlson, ME Gallagher, K Lieberthal, M Manion 145–61 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
127. Reno W. 1998. Warlord Politics and African States Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner [Google Scholar]
128. Romano D. 2006. Conducting research in the Middle East's conflict zones. PS Polit. Sci. Polit. 39:3439–41 [Google Scholar]
129. Rone J. 1996. Behind the Red Line: Political Repression in Sudan New York: Hum. Rights Watch [Google Scholar]
130. Rowen J. 2016. We don't believe in transitional justice: war, peace and the circulation of legal ideas in Colombia. Law Soc. Inq. 41:In press [Google Scholar]
131. Sachs JA. 2013. “Native courts” and the limits of the law in colonial Sudan: ambiguity as strategy. Law Soc. Inq. 38:4973–92 [Google Scholar]
132. Scammell R, Michaelson R. 2016. Italy prepares to repatriate body of Cambridge student Giulio Regeni. The Guardian Feb. 5. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/feb/05/italy-prepares-repatriate-body-cambridge-student-giulio-regeni [Google Scholar]
133. Scholars at Risk Network 2016. Scholars at Risk Network http://scholarsatrisk.nyu.edu/ [Google Scholar]
134. Selznick P. 1959. The sociology of law. Sociology Today R Merton, L Broom, L Cottrell 115–29 New York: Basic Books [Google Scholar]
135. Seron C, Coutin SB, White Meeusen P. 2013. Is there a canon of law and society. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 9:287–306 [Google Scholar]
136. Sezgin Y. 2013. Human Rights Under State-Enforced Religious Family Laws in Israel, Egypt, and India Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
137. Shaffir W, Stebbins RA. 1991. Experiencing Fieldwork: An Inside View of Qualitative Research Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage [Google Scholar]
138. Shaver A, Zhou Y-Y. 2016. How to make surveys in war zones better, and why this is important. Washington Post Monkey Cage Blog Jan. 7. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkey-cage/wp/2015/01/06/how-to-make-surveys-in-war-zones-better-and-why-this-is-important/ [Google Scholar]
139. Solomon PH. 2015. Understanding the history of Soviet criminal justice: the contribution of archives and other sources. Russ. Rev. 74:3401–18 [Google Scholar]
140. Spamann H. 2015. Empirical comparative law. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 11:131–53 [Google Scholar]
141. Sriram CL, King JC, Mertus JA, Martin-Ortega O, Herman J. 2009. Surviving Field Research: Working in Violent and Difficult Situations London: Routledge [Google Scholar]
142. Stephens D. 2009. Qualitative Research in International Settings: A Practical Guide London: Routledge [Google Scholar]
143. Stern RE. 2010. On the frontlines: making decisions in Chinese civil environmental lawsuits. Law Policy 32:179–103 [Google Scholar]
144. Stern RE. 2011. From dispute to decision: suing polluters in China. China Q 206:294–312 [Google Scholar]
145. Stern RE. 2013. Environmental Litigation in China: A Study in Political Ambivalence Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
146. Suchman MC, Mertz E. 2010. Toward a new legal empiricism: empirical legal studies and new legal realism. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 6:555–79 [Google Scholar]
147. Taussig M. 2006. Law in a Lawless Land: Diary of a Limpieza in Colombia Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
148. Trubek DM, Galanter M. 1974. Scholars in self-estrangement: some reflections on the crisis in law and development studies in the United States. Wis. Law Rev. 1974:1062–102 [Google Scholar]
149. US Dep. State 2016. State Sponsors of Terrorism Washington, DC: US Dep. State http://www.state.gov/j/ct/list/c14151.htm [Google Scholar]
150. Van Maanen J. 2011. Tales of the Field: On Writing Ethnography Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 2nd ed.. [Google Scholar]
151. Vogt A. 2016. Italian Cambridge PhD student suffered “inhuman, animal-like” violence before his death in Egypt. Telegraph Feb. 7. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/egypt/12145257/Italian-Cambridge-PhD-student-suffered-inhuman-animal-like-violence-before-his-death-in-Egypt.html [Google Scholar]
152. Wax ML. 1980. Paradoxes of “consent” to the practice of fieldwork. Soc. Probl. 27:3272–83 [Google Scholar]
153. Webley L. 2010. Qualitative approaches to empirical legal research. See Cane & Kritzer 2010, pp 927–50
154. Wedeen L. 1999. Ambiguities of Domination: Politics, Rhetoric, and Symbols in Contemporary Syria Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
155. Weiss M. 2010. In the Shadow of Sectarianism: Law, Shi‘ism, and the Making of Modern Lebanon Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
156. Wood EJ. 2006. The ethical challenges of field research in conflict zones. Qual. Sociol. 29:3373–86 [Google Scholar]
157. Yanow D, Schwartz-Shea P. 2013. Meaning and methodology. Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretive Turn D Yanow, P Schwartz-Shea, pp 1–26 London: ME Sharpe, 2nd ed.. [Google Scholar]
158. Yashar D. 2015. Editorial trust, gatekeeping, and unintended consequences. Comp. Polit. Newsl. 26:157–64 [Google Scholar]
159. Young C. 2006. The heart of the African conflict zone: democratization, ethnicity, civil conflict, and the Great Lakes crisis. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 9:301–28 [Google Scholar]
160. Young KM. 2014. Everyone knows the game: legal consciousness in the Hawaiian cockfight. Law Soc. Rev. 48:3499–530 [Google Scholar]
161. Zenker O, Kumoll K. 2010. Beyond Writing Culture: Current Intersections of Epistemologies and Representational Practices New York: Berghahn Books [Google Scholar]