1932

Abstract

A law firm is an organization staffed, owned, and managed by professionals; as such, law firms sit at the nexus of two distinct strands of academic inquiry: work on the professions and work on organizations. Law firms are governed by distinct rules, perform specialized work, and must integrate professional norms with organizational goals—and thus they present a unique challenge to researchers. This article reviews the organizational literature examining the structure and behavior of corporate law firms, connects this work to the sociological literature on the legal profession, and suggests new ways to combine these approaches and thereby deepen our understanding of the law firm as a unique organizational form.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110615-085217
2016-10-27
2024-04-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/lawsocsci/12/1/annurev-lawsocsci-110615-085217.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110615-085217&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abbott A. 1988. The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  2. Abel RL. 1986. The transformation of the American legal profession. Law Soc. Rev. 20:7–17 [Google Scholar]
  3. Ackroyd S, Muzio D. 2007. The reconstructed professional firm: explaining change in English legal practices. Organ. Stud. 28:729–47 [Google Scholar]
  4. Akerlof GA. 1970. The market for “lemons”: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Q. J. Econ. 84:488–500 [Google Scholar]
  5. Briscoe F, Tsai W. 2011. Overcoming relational inertia: how organizational members respond to acquisition events in a law firm. Adm. Sci. Q. 56:408–40 [Google Scholar]
  6. Brock DM, Leblebici H, Muzio D. 2014. Understanding professionals and their workplaces: the mission of the Journal of Professions and Organization. J. Prof. Organ. 1:1–15 [Google Scholar]
  7. Burk BA, McGowan D. 2011. Big but brittle: economic perspectives on the future of the law firm in the new economy. Columbia Bus. Law Rev. 2011:1–117 [Google Scholar]
  8. Caplan L. 1994. Skadden: Power, Money, and the Rise of a Legal Empire New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux
  9. Chambliss E. 2009. New sources of managerial authority in large law firms. Georgetown J. Leg. Ethics 22:63–96 [Google Scholar]
  10. Chambliss E. 2010. Measuring law firm culture. Stud. Law Polit. Soc. 52:1–31 [Google Scholar]
  11. Chayes A, Chayes AH. 1985. Corporate counsel and the elite law firm. Stanford Law Rev 37:277–300 [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen AK, Cummings S. 2012. Public Interest Lawyering: A Contemporary Perspective New York: Aspen
  13. Chiu C, Leicht K. 1999. When does feminization increase equality? The case of lawyers. Law Soc. Rev. 33:557–93 [Google Scholar]
  14. Cook W, Ormerod P. 2003. Power law distribution of the frequency of demises of U.S. firms. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Appl. 324:207–12 [Google Scholar]
  15. Cooper DJ, Hinings B, Greenwood R, Brown JL. 1996. Sedimentation and transformation in organizational change: the case of Canadian law firms. Organ. Stud. 17:623–47 [Google Scholar]
  16. DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW. 1983. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am. Sociol. Rev. 48:147–60 [Google Scholar]
  17. Dinovitzer R. 2011. The financial rewards of elite status in the legal profession. Law Soc. Inq. 36:971–98 [Google Scholar]
  18. Dinovitzer R, Garth BG. 2007. Lawyer satisfaction in the process of structuring legal careers. Law Soc. Rev. 41:1–50 [Google Scholar]
  19. Edelman LB, Suchman MC. 1999. When the haves hold court: speculations on the organizational internalization of law. Law Soc. Rev. 33:941–91 [Google Scholar]
  20. Empson L. 2012. Beyond dichotomies: a multi-stage model of governance in professional service firms. Handbook of Research on Entrepreneurship in Professional Services M Reihlen, A Werr 274–96 Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar [Google Scholar]
  21. Empson L, Cleaver I, Allen J. 2013. Managing partners and management professionals: institutional work dyads in professional partnerships. J. Manag. Stud. 50:808–44 [Google Scholar]
  22. Faulconbridge JR, Muzio D. 2008. Organizational professionalism in globalizing law firms. Work Employ. Soc. 22:7–25 [Google Scholar]
  23. Faulconbridge JR, Muzio D. 2012. Professions in a globalizing world: towards a transnational sociology of the professions. Int. Sociol. 27:136–52 [Google Scholar]
  24. Fischel DR. 2000. Multidisciplinary practice. Bus. Lawyer 55:951–74 [Google Scholar]
  25. Fligstein N. 1987. The intraorganizational power struggle: rise of finance personnel to top leadership in large corporations, 1919–1979. Am. Sociol. Rev. 52:44–58 [Google Scholar]
  26. Fligstein N. 1990. The Transformation of Corporate Control Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  27. Fligstein N, McAdam D. 2012. A Theory of Fields New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  28. Forsyth PB, Danisiewicz TJ. 1985. Toward a theory of professionalization. Work Occup 12:59–76 [Google Scholar]
  29. Fox LJ. 2008. Raise the Bar: Real World Solutions for a Troubled Profession Chicago: Am. Bar Assoc.
  30. Friedman LM. 2005. A History of American Law New York: Touchstone, 3rd ed..
  31. Galanter M, Henderson W. 2008. The elastic tournament: the second transformation of the big law firm. Stanford Law Rev 60:1867–929 [Google Scholar]
  32. Galanter M, Palay T. 1994. Tournament of Lawyers: The Transformation of the Big Law Firm Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  33. Garicano L, Santos T. 2004. Referrals. Am. Econ. Rev. 94:499–525 [Google Scholar]
  34. Gilson RJ. 1984. Value creation by business lawyers: legal skills and asset pricing. Yale Law J 94:239–313 [Google Scholar]
  35. Gilson RJ, Mnookin RH. 1984. Sharing among the human capitalists: an economic inquiry into the corporate law firm and how partners split profits. Stanford Law Rev 37:313–92 [Google Scholar]
  36. Gilson RJ, Mnookin RH. 1989. Coming of age in a corporate law firm: the economics of associate career patterns. Stanford Law Rev 41:567–95 [Google Scholar]
  37. Gilson RJ, Mnookin RH. 1990. The implicit contract for corporate law firm associates. The Firm as a Nexus of Treaties M Aoki, B Gustafsson, OE Williamson 209–36 Newbury Park, CA: Sage [Google Scholar]
  38. Gorman EH. 1999. Moving away from “up or out”: determinants of permanent employment in law firms. Law Soc. Rev. 33:637–66 [Google Scholar]
  39. Granovetter M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. Am. J. Sociol. 91:481–510 [Google Scholar]
  40. Granovetter M. 2005. The impact of social structure on economic outcomes. J. Econ. Perspect. 19:33–50 [Google Scholar]
  41. Greenwood R, Lachman R. 1996. Change as an underlying theme in professional service organizations: an introduction. Organ. Stud. 17:563–72 [Google Scholar]
  42. Greenwood R, Suddaby R. 2006. Professional Service Firms Oxford: Elsevier JAI
  43. Hadfield GK. 2008. Legal barriers to innovation: the growing economic cost of professional control over corporate legal markets. Stanford Law Rev 60:101–46 [Google Scholar]
  44. Halliday TC. 1987. Beyond Monopoly: Lawyers, State Crises, and Professional Empowerment Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  45. Hannan MT, Freeman J. 1993. Organizational Ecology Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  46. Haveman HA. 1993. Follow the leader: mimetic isomorphism and entry into new markets. Adm. Sci. Q. 38:593–627 [Google Scholar]
  47. Heinz JP. 2009. When law firms fail. Suffolk Univ. Law Rev. 43:67–78 [Google Scholar]
  48. Heinz JP, Laumann EO. 1982. Chicago Lawyers: The Social Structure of the Bar New York: Russell Sage Found.
  49. Heinz JP, Laumann EO, Nelson RL, Schnorr PS. 1997. The constituencies of elite urban lawyers. Law Soc. Rev. 31:441–72 [Google Scholar]
  50. Heinz JP, Nelson RL, Laumann EO. 2001. The scale of justice: observations on the transformation of urban law practice. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 27:337–62 [Google Scholar]
  51. Heinz JP, Nelson RL, Sandefur RL, Laumann EO. 2005. Urban Lawyers: The New Social Structure of the Bar Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  52. Henderson WD, Bierman L. 2009. An empirical analysis of lateral lawyer trends from 2000 to 2007: the emerging equilibrium for corporate law firms. Georgetown J. Leg. Ethics 22:1395–430 [Google Scholar]
  53. Hitt MA, Bierman L, Shimizu K, Kochhar R. 2001. Direct and moderating effects of human capital on strategy and performance in professional service firms: a resource-based perspective. Acad. Manag. J. 44:13–28 [Google Scholar]
  54. Hobson WK. 1984. Symbol of the new profession: emergence of the large law firm, 1870–1915. The New High Priests: Lawyers in Post-Civil War America GW Gawalt 17–19 Westport, CT: Praeger [Google Scholar]
  55. Hull KE, Nelson RL. 2000. Assimilation, choice, or constraint? Testing theories of gender differences in the careers of lawyers. Soc. Forces 79:229–64 [Google Scholar]
  56. Hurst JW. 1950. The Growth of American Law Clark, NJ: Lawbook Exchange
  57. Iacobucci EM. 2012. Reputational economies of scale, with application to law firms. Am. Law Econ. Rev. 14:302–29 [Google Scholar]
  58. Kagan RA, Rosen RE. 1984. On the social significance of large law firm practice. Stanford Law Rev 37:399–443 [Google Scholar]
  59. Kay FM, Gorman E. 2008. Women in the legal profession. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 4:299–332 [Google Scholar]
  60. Kay FM, Gorman E. 2012. Developmental practices, organizational culture, and minority representation in organizational leadership: the case of partners in large U.S. law firms. Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 639:91–113 [Google Scholar]
  61. Kay FM, Wallace JE. 2010. Is more truly merrier? Mentoring and the practice of law. Can. Rev. Sociol. 47:1–26 [Google Scholar]
  62. Kim HH. 2009. Networks, information transfer, and status conferral: the role of social capital in income stratification among lawyers. Sociol. Q. 50:61–87 [Google Scholar]
  63. Kordana KA. 1995. Law firms and associate careers: tournament theory versus the production-imperative model. Yale Law J 104:1907–34 [Google Scholar]
  64. Krippner GR. 2005. The financialization of the American economy. Socio-Econ. Rev. 3:173–208 [Google Scholar]
  65. Ladinsky J. 1963. Careers of lawyers, law practice, and legal institutions. Am. Sociol. Rev. 28:47–54 [Google Scholar]
  66. Larson MS. 1977. The Rise of Professionalism: Monopolies of Competence and Sheltered Markets New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction
  67. Lazega E. 2001. The Collegial Phenomenon: The Social Mechanisms of Co-Operation Among Peers in a Corporate Law Partnership Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
  68. Lazega E. 2005. A theory of collegiality and its relevance for understanding professions and knowledge-intensive organizations. Organisation und Profession T Klatetzki, V Tacke 221–52 Wiesbaden, Ger.: Springer [Google Scholar]
  69. Lazega E, van Duijn M. 1997. Position in formal structure, personal characteristics and choices of advisors in a law firm: a logistic regression model for dyadic network data. Soc. Netw. 19:375–97 [Google Scholar]
  70. Leahey E, Hunter LA. 2012. Lawyers' lines of work: specialization's role in the income determination process. Soc. Forces 90:1101–31 [Google Scholar]
  71. Leicht KT, Fennell ML. 1997. The changing organizational context of professional work. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 23:215–31 [Google Scholar]
  72. Levin J, Tadelis S. 2005. Profit sharing and the role of professional partnerships. Q. J. Econ. 120:131–71 [Google Scholar]
  73. Liu S. 2013. The legal profession as a social process: a theory on lawyers and globalization. Law Soc. Inq. 38:670–93 [Google Scholar]
  74. Llewellyn KN. 1934. Bar specialized with what results. Commer. Law J. 39:336–43 [Google Scholar]
  75. Malhotra N, Morris T, Hinings CR. 2006. Variation in organizational form among professional service organizations. Res. Sociol. Organ. 24:171–202 [Google Scholar]
  76. McEvily B, Jaffee J, Tortoriello M. 2012. Not all bridging ties are equal: network imprinting and firm growth in the Nashville legal industry, 1933–1978. Organ. Sci. 23:547–63 [Google Scholar]
  77. Meyer JW, Rowan B. 1977. Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. Am. J. Sociol. 83:340–63 [Google Scholar]
  78. Mills CW. 1951. White Collar: The American Middle Classes Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
  79. Moorhead R. 2010. Lawyer specialization—managing the professional paradox. Law Policy 32:226–59 [Google Scholar]
  80. Muzio D, Brock DM, Suddaby R. 2013. Professions and institutional change: towards an institutionalist sociology of the professions. J. Manag. Stud. 50:699–721 [Google Scholar]
  81. Muzio D, Kirkpatrick I. 2011. Introduction: professions and organizations—a conceptual framework. Curr. Sociol. 59:389–405 [Google Scholar]
  82. National Law Journal 2012. What happened to the top firms of 1978?. National Law Journal, April 9. http://www.nationallawjournal.com/id=1202548253038?slreturn=20160015080957 [Google Scholar]
  83. Nelson RL. 1988. Partners with Power: Social Transformation of the Large Law Firm Oakland: Univ. Calif. Press
  84. Nelson RL, Nielsen LB. 2000. Cops, counsel, and entrepreneurs: constructing the role of inside counsel in large corporations. Law Soc. Rev. 34:457–94 [Google Scholar]
  85. Nielsen LB, Albiston CR. 2005. The organization of public interest practice: 1975–2004. N.C. Law Rev. 84:1591–622 [Google Scholar]
  86. Olson E. 2014. Revenues at the top 100 law firms rose 5.4% last year. New York Times April 28. http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2014/04/28/revenues-at-the-top-100-law-firms-rose-5-4-last-year/ [Google Scholar]
  87. Parsons T. 1954. Essays in Sociological Theory New York: Simon & Schuster
  88. Patton PA. 2005. Large law firms and their role in the educational continuum of lawyers. Fordham Urban Law J 33:233–44 [Google Scholar]
  89. Payne-Pikus MR, Hagan J, Nelson RL. 2010. Experiencing discrimination: race and retention in America's largest law firms. Law Soc. Rev. 44:553–84 [Google Scholar]
  90. Pfeffer J, Salancik G. 2003. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Bus. Books
  91. Phillips DJ. 2001. The promotion paradox: organizational mortality and employee promotion chances in silicon valley law firms, 1946–1996. Am. J. Sociol. 106:1058–98 [Google Scholar]
  92. Phillips DJ. 2002. A genealogical approach to organizational life chances: the parent-progeny transfer among Silicon Valley law firms, 1946–1996. Adm. Sci. Q. 47:474–506 [Google Scholar]
  93. Phillips DJ, Turco CJ, Zuckerman EW. 2013. Betrayal as market barrier: identity-based limits to diversification among high-status corporate law firms. Am. J. Sociol. 118:1023–54 [Google Scholar]
  94. Pinansky TP. 1986. The emergence of law firms in the American legal profession. Univ. Ark. Little Rock Law J. 9:593–640 [Google Scholar]
  95. Pinnington A, Morris T. 2003. Archetype change in professional organizations: survey evidence from large law firms. Br. J. Manag. 14:85–99 [Google Scholar]
  96. Powell WW, DiMaggio PJ. 1991. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  97. Rebitzer JB, Taylor LJ. 2006. When Knowledge Is an Asset: Explaining the Organizational Structure of Large Law Firms Washington, DC: Natl. Bur. Econ. Res.
  98. Regan M. 2002. Corporate norms and contemporary law firm practice. George Wash. Law Rev. 70:931–43 [Google Scholar]
  99. Ribstein LE. 1998. Ethical rules, agency costs, and law firm structure. Va. Law Rev. 84:1707–59 [Google Scholar]
  100. Ribstein LE. 2010. The death of big law. Wis. Law Rev. 2010:749–816 [Google Scholar]
  101. Rosen RE. 2010. Rejecting the culture of independence: corporate lawyers as committed to their clients. Stud. Law Polit. Soc. 52:33–71 [Google Scholar]
  102. Salancik GR. 1995. Wanted: a good network theory of organization. Adm. Sci. Q. 40:345–49 [Google Scholar]
  103. Scott WR. 1987. The adolescence of institutional theory. Adm. Sci. Q. 32:493–511 [Google Scholar]
  104. Scott WR. 2005. Evolving professions: an institutional field approach. Organisation und Profession T Klatetzki, V Tacke 119–42 Wiesbaden, Ger.: Springer [Google Scholar]
  105. Seron C. 2007. The status of legal professionalism at the close of the twentieth century: Chicago lawyers and urban lawyers. Law Soc. Inq. 32:581–607 [Google Scholar]
  106. Sherer PD. 1995. Leveraging human assets in law firms: human capital structures and organizational capabilities. Ind. Labor Relat. Rev. 48:671–91 [Google Scholar]
  107. Sherer PD, Lee K. 2002. Institutional change in large law firms: a resource dependency and institutional perspective. Acad. Manag. J. 45:102–19 [Google Scholar]
  108. Smigel EO. 1969. The Wall Street Lawyer, Professional Organization Man? Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press
  109. Spar DL. 1997. Lawyers abroad: the internationalization of legal practice. Calif. Manag. Rev. 39:8–28 [Google Scholar]
  110. Spence M. 1973. Job market signaling. Q. J. Econ. 87:355–74 [Google Scholar]
  111. Stinchcombe AL. 1965. Social structure and organizations. Handbook of Organizations JG March 142–93 New York: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  112. Stroud S. 2001. Non-compete agreements: weighing the interests of profession and firm. Ala. Law Rev. 53:1023–42 [Google Scholar]
  113. Suchman MC, Edelman LB. 1996. Legal rational myths: the new institutionalism and the law and society tradition. Law Soc. Inq. 21:903–41 [Google Scholar]
  114. Swaine RT. 1948. The Cravath Firm and Its Predecessors, 1819–1948 Clark, NJ: Lawbook Exchange
  115. Tolbert PS. 1988. Institutional sources of organizational culture in major law firms. Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment LG Zucker 101–13 Boston: Ballinger [Google Scholar]
  116. Tolbert PS, Stern RN. 1991. Organizations of professionals. governance structures in large law firms. Research in the Sociology of Organizations PS Tolbert SR Barley 97–118 Greenwich, CT: JAI Press [Google Scholar]
  117. Triedman J. 2015. How Bingham failed: the inside story. The American Lawyer Jan 14 . http://www.americanlawyer.com/id=1202713087826/How-Bingham-Failed-The-Inside-Story
  118. Uzzi B. 1996. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: the network effect. Am. Sociol. Rev. 61:674–98 [Google Scholar]
  119. Uzzi B, Lancaster R. 2004. Embeddedness and price formation in the corporate law market. Am. Sociol. Rev. 69:319–44 [Google Scholar]
  120. Von Nordenflycht A. 2010. What is a professional service firm? Toward a theory and taxonomy of knowledge-intensive firms. Acad. Manag. Rev. 35:155–74 [Google Scholar]
  121. Wallace JE. 1995. Corporatist control and organizational commitment among professionals: the case of lawyers working in law firms. Soc. Forces 73:811–40 [Google Scholar]
  122. Wallace JE, Kay FM. 2009. Are small firms more beautiful or is bigger better? A study of compensating differentials and law firm internal labor markets. Sociol. Q. 50:474–96 [Google Scholar]
  123. Weber M. 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology Oakland: Univ. Calif. Press
  124. Wilkins DB, Coates JC, DeStefano MM, Nanda A. 2011. Hiring teams, firms, and lawyers: evidence of the evolving relationships in the corporate legal market. Law Soc. Inq. 36:999–1031 [Google Scholar]
  125. Wilkins DB, Gulati GM. 1998. Reconceiving the tournament of lawyers: tracking, seeding, and information control in the internal labor markets of elite law firms. Va. Law Rev. 84:1581–681 [Google Scholar]
  126. Wilson L. 2012. Financing professional partnerships. J. Econ. Financ. 36:58–92 [Google Scholar]
  127. Zucker LG. 1987. Institutional theories of organization. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 13:443–64 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110615-085217
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110615-085217
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error