1932

Abstract

The topic of workplace discrimination has received considerable attention in both empirical sociolegal scholarship and critical race theory. This article reviews the insights of both bodies of literature and draws on those insights to highlight a critical mismatch between the assumptions of antidiscrimination jurisprudence and extant knowledge about discrimination in the workplace. Antidiscrimination jurisprudence assumes that most discrimination is intentional, that legal rights provide an effective mechanism for redress of discrimination, and that employers respond rationally to legal sanctions. In contrast, the empirical sociolegal and critical race literatures show that racism and sexism tend to be hidden within social structures, that there are many obstacles to the successful mobilization of legal rights, and that organizational response to law is characterized by symbolic compliance that is often ineffective. We conclude that because law fails to grasp the reality of workplace discrimination, it condones racial and gender inequality and creates legal discrimination.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110615-085234
2016-10-27
2024-06-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/lawsocsci/12/1/annurev-lawsocsci-110615-085234.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110615-085234&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Albiston CR. 1999. The rule of law and the litigation process: the paradox of losing by winning. Law Soc. Rev. 33:4869–910 [Google Scholar]
  2. Albiston CR. 2010. Institutional Inequality and the Mobilization of the Family and Medical Leave Act: Rights on Leave New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  3. Albiston CR, Edelman LB, Milligan J. 2014. The dispute tree and the legal forest. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 10:105–31 [Google Scholar]
  4. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. 477 U.S. 242 1986.
  5. Ansley FL. 1989. Stirring the ashes: race, class and the future of civil rights scholarship. Cornell Law Rev 74:6993–1077 [Google Scholar]
  6. Ashcroft v. Iqbal 556 U.S. 662 2009.
  7. Austin R. 1989. Sapphire bound!. Wis. Law Rev. 1989:539–78 [Google Scholar]
  8. Banaji MR, Greenwald AG. 1995. Implicit gender stereotyping in judgments of fame. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 68:2181–98 [Google Scholar]
  9. Baron JN, Bielby WT. 1980. Bringing the firms back in: stratification, segmentation, and the organization of work. Am. Sociol. Rev. 45:5737–65 [Google Scholar]
  10. Baron JN, Bielby WT. 1984. The organization of work in a segmented economy. Am. Sociol. Rev. 49:4454–73 [Google Scholar]
  11. Baron JN, Bielby WT. 1985. Organizational barriers to gender equality: sex segregation of jobs and opportunities. Gender and the Life Course AS Rossi 233–51 Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter [Google Scholar]
  12. Becker GS. 1971. The Economics of Discrimination Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  13. Bell Atlantic Corporation v. Twombly 550 U.S. 544 2007.
  14. Berrey E. 2015. The Enigma of Diversity: The Language of Race and the Limits of Racial Justice Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  15. Bertrand M, Mullainathan S. 2004. Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. Am. Econ. Rev. 94:4991–1013 [Google Scholar]
  16. Best RK, Edelman LB, Krieger LH, Eliason SR. 2011. Multiple disadvantages: an empirical test of intersectionality theory in EEO litigation. Law Soc. Rev. 45:4991–1025 [Google Scholar]
  17. Bielby WT. 2000. Minimizing workplace gender and racial bias. Contemp. Sociol. 29:1120–29 [Google Scholar]
  18. Bielby WT, Baron JN. 1986. Men and women at work: sex segregation and statistical discrimination. Am. J. Sociol. 91:4759–99 [Google Scholar]
  19. Bingham L. 1997. Employment arbitration: the repeat player effect. Empl. Rights Employ. Policy J. 1:1189–220 [Google Scholar]
  20. Bisom-Rapp S. 1999. Bulletproofing the workplace: symbol and substance in employment discrimination law practice. Fla. State Univ. Law Rev. 26:959–1038 [Google Scholar]
  21. Bodenhausen GV. 2010. Diversity in the person, diversity in the group: challenges of identity complexity for social perception and social interaction. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 40:11–16 [Google Scholar]
  22. Bodenhausen GV, Wyer RS. 1985. Effects of stereotypes in decision making and information-processing strategies. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 48:2267–82 [Google Scholar]
  23. Boyd CL, Hoffman DA, Obradovic Z, Ristovski K. 2013. Building a taxonomy of litigation: clusters of causes of action in federal complaints. J. Empir. Leg. Stud. 10:2253–87 [Google Scholar]
  24. Braddock JH, McPartland JM. 1987. How minorities continue to be excluded from equal employment opportunities: research on labor market and institutional barriers. J. Soc. Issues 43:15–39 [Google Scholar]
  25. Browne I, Misra J. 2003. The intersection of gender and race in the labor market. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 29:487–513 [Google Scholar]
  26. Bumiller K. 1987. Victims in the shadow of the law: a critique of the model of legal protection. Signs 12:3421–39 [Google Scholar]
  27. Bumiller K. 1988. The Civil Rights Society: The Social Construction of Victims Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.172 [Google Scholar]
  28. Burstein P. 1985. Discrimination, Jobs, and Politics: The Struggle for Equal Employment Opportunity in the United States since the New Deal Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  29. Caldwell PM. 1991. A hair piece: perspectives on the intersection of race and gender. Duke Law J. 1991:365–96 [Google Scholar]
  30. Carbado DW. 2009. Yellow by law. Calif. Law Rev. 97:3633–92 [Google Scholar]
  31. Carbado DW. 2013. Colorblind intersectionality. Signs 38:4811–45 [Google Scholar]
  32. Carbado DW, Gulati M. 2000. Working identity. Cornell Law Rev 85:1259–308 [Google Scholar]
  33. Carbado DW, Gulati M. 2003. The law and economics of critical race theory. Yale Law J 112:71757–828 [Google Scholar]
  34. Carbado DW, Gulati M. 2013. Acting White?: Rethinking Race in Post-Racial America Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  35. Carbado DW, Roithmayr D. 2014. Critical race theory meets social science. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 10:149–67 [Google Scholar]
  36. Castilla EJ. 2008. Gender, race, and meritocracy in organizational careers. Am. J. Sociol. 113:61479–526 [Google Scholar]
  37. Castilla EJ, Benard S. 2010. The paradox of meritocracy in organizations. Adm. Sci. Q. 55:4543–676 [Google Scholar]
  38. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett 477 U.S. 317 1986.
  39. Chen AS. 2009. The Fifth Freedom: Jobs, Politics, and Civil Rights in the United States, 1941–1972 Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  40. Collins PH. 1999. Moving beyond gender: intersectionality and scientific knowledge. Revisioning Gender MM Ferree, J Lorber, BB Hess 261–84 Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira [Google Scholar]
  41. Collins PH. 2015. Intersectionality's definitional dilemmas. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 41:1–20 [Google Scholar]
  42. Collins SM. 1989. The marginalization of black executives. Soc. Probl. 36:4317–31 [Google Scholar]
  43. Colvin AJS. 2008. Empirical research on employment arbitration: Clarity amidst the sound and fury?. Empl. Rights Employ. Policy J. 11:2405–47 [Google Scholar]
  44. Colvin AJS. 2011. An empirical study of employment arbitration: case outcomes and processes. J. Empir. Leg. Stud. 8:11–23 [Google Scholar]
  45. Conley v. Gibson 355 U.S. 41 1957.
  46. Crenshaw K. 1989. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: a black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. Univ. Chic. Legal Forum 1989:1139–67 [Google Scholar]
  47. Crenshaw K. 1991. Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Rev. 43:61241–99 [Google Scholar]
  48. DiMaggio P. 1997. Culture and cognition. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 23:263–87 [Google Scholar]
  49. Dobbin F. 2009. Inventing Equal Opportunity Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  50. Dobbin F, Sutton JR, Meyer JW, Scott R. 1993. Equal opportunity law and the construction of internal labor markets. Am. J. Sociol. 99:2396–427 [Google Scholar]
  51. Dovidio JF, Gaertner SL. 2000. Aversive racism and selection decisions: 1989 and 1999. Psychol. Sci. 11:4315–19 [Google Scholar]
  52. Duncan BL. 1976. Differential social perception and attribution of intergroup violence: testing the lower limits of stereotyping of blacks. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 34:4590–98 [Google Scholar]
  53. Eagly AH. 2007. Female leadership advantage and disadvantage: resolving the contradictions. Psychol. Women Q. 31:11–12 [Google Scholar]
  54. Eagly AH, Carli LL. 2007. Through the Labyrinth: The Truth About How Women Become Leaders Cambridge, MA: Harvard Bus. Press [Google Scholar]
  55. Edelman LB. 1990. Legal environments and organizational governance: the expansion of due process in the American workplace. Am. J. Sociol. 95:61401–40 [Google Scholar]
  56. Edelman LB. 1992. Legal ambiguity and symbolic structures: organizational mediation of civil rights law. Am. J. Sociol. 97:61531–76 [Google Scholar]
  57. Edelman LB. 2016. Working Law: Courts, Corporations, and Symbolic Civil Rights Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  58. Edelman LB, Abraham SE, Erlanger HS. 1992. Professional construction of law: the inflated threat of wrongful discharge. Law Soc. Rev. 26:147–83 [Google Scholar]
  59. Edelman LB, Cahill M. 1998. How law matters in disputing and dispute processing (or, the contingency of legal matter in alternative dispute resolution). How Law Matters BG Garth, A Sarat 15–44 Chicago: Northwest. Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  60. Edelman LB, Erlanger HS, Lande J. 1993. Internal dispute resolution: the transformation of civil rights in the workplace. Law Soc. Rev. 27:3497–534 [Google Scholar]
  61. Edelman LB, Fuller SR, Mara-Drita I. 2001. Diversity rhetoric and the managerialization of law. Am. J. Sociol. 106:61589–641 [Google Scholar]
  62. Edelman LB, Krieger LH, Eliason SR, Albiston CR, Mellema V. 2011. When organizations rule: judicial deference to institutionalized employment structures. Am. J. Sociol. 117:3888–954 [Google Scholar]
  63. Edelman LB, Petterson S, Chambliss E, Erlanger HS. 1991. Legal ambiguity and the politics of compliance: affirmative action officers' dilemma. Law Policy 13:173–97 [Google Scholar]
  64. Edelman LB, Petterson SM. 1999. Symbols and substance in organizational response to civil rights law. Res. Soc. Stratif. Mobil. 17:107–38 [Google Scholar]
  65. Edelman LB, Suchman MC. 1997. The legal environments of organizations. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 23:479–515 [Google Scholar]
  66. Edelman LB, Uggen C, Erlanger HS. 1999. The endogeneity of legal regulation: grievance procedures as rational myth. Am. J. Sociol. 105:2406–54 [Google Scholar]
  67. Engel DM. 1984. The oven bird's song: insiders, outsiders, and personal injuries in an American community. Law Soc. Rev. 18:4551–82 [Google Scholar]
  68. Epp CR. 2009. Making Rights Real: Activists, Bureaucrats, and the Creation of the Legalistic State Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press320 [Google Scholar]
  69. Erickson BH. 1996. Culture, class, and connections. Am. J. Sociol. 102:1217–51 [Google Scholar]
  70. Farhang S. 2010. The Litigation State: Public Regulation and Private Lawsuits in the United States Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.302 [Google Scholar]
  71. Felstiner WLF, Abel RL, Sarat A. 1980. The emergence and transformation of disputes: naming, blaming, claiming. Law Soc. Rev. 15:3–4631–54 [Google Scholar]
  72. Fiske ST. 2002. What we know now about bias and intergroup conflict, the problem of the century. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 11:4123–28 [Google Scholar]
  73. Fiske ST, Borgida E. 2008. Providing expert knowledge in an adversarial context: social cognitive science in employment discrimination cases. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 4:123–48 [Google Scholar]
  74. Freeman A. 1989. Antidiscrimination law: the view from 1989. Tulane Law Rev 64:1407 [Google Scholar]
  75. Galanter M. 1974. Why the haves come out ahead: speculations on the limits of legal change. Law Soc. Rev. 9:195–160 [Google Scholar]
  76. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corporation 500 U.S. 20 (1991)
  77. Gómez LE. 2004. A tale of two genres: on the real and ideal links between law and society and critical race theory. Blackwell Companion to Law and Society A Sarat 453–70 New York: Blackwell [Google Scholar]
  78. Gómez LE. 2007. Manifest Destinies: The Making of the Mexican American Race New York: N.Y. Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  79. Gómez LE. 2010. Understanding law and race as mutually constitutive: an invitation to explore an emerging field. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 6:487–505 [Google Scholar]
  80. Gómez LE. 2012. Looking for race in all the wrong places. Law Soc. Rev. 46:2221–45 [Google Scholar]
  81. Gorman EH. 2005. Gender stereotypes, same-gender preferences, and organizational variation in the hiring of women: evidence from law firms. Am. Sociol. Rev. 70:4702–28 [Google Scholar]
  82. Greenwald AG, Krieger LH. 2006. Implicit bias: scientific foundations. Calif. Law Rev. 94:4945–67 [Google Scholar]
  83. Greenwald AG, McGhee DE, Schwartz JLK. 1998. Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 74:61464–80 [Google Scholar]
  84. Greenwald AG, Poehlman TA, Uhlmann EL, Banaji MR. 2009. Understanding and using the implicit association test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 97:117–41 [Google Scholar]
  85. Griggs v. Duke Power Co. 401 U.S. 424 1971.
  86. Gustafson JL. 2008. Tokenism in policing: an empirical test of Kanter's hypothesis. J. Crim. Justice 36:11–10 [Google Scholar]
  87. Hamilton DL, Trolier TK. 1986. Stereotypes and stereotyping: an overview of the cognitive approach. Prejudice, Discrimination, and Racism JF Dovidio, SL Gaertner 127–63 San Diego: Academic [Google Scholar]
  88. Haney-López IF. 1994. The social construction of race: some observations on illusion, fabrication, and choice. Harvard Civ. Rights Civ. Lib. Law Rev. 29:1–62 [Google Scholar]
  89. Haney-López IF. 1996. White by Law: The Legal Construction of Race New York: N.Y. Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  90. Haney-López IF. 2000. Institutional racism: judicial conduct and a new theory of racial discrimination. Yale Law J. 109:81717–884 [Google Scholar]
  91. Haney-López IF. 2007. “A nation of minorities”: race, ethnicity, and reactionary colorblindness. Stanford Law Rev. 59:4985–1063 [Google Scholar]
  92. Harris AP. 1990. Race and essentialism in feminist legal theory. Stanford Law Rev. 42:3581–616 [Google Scholar]
  93. Hartmann HI. 1987. Internal labor markets and gender: a case study of promotion. Gender in the Workplace C Brown, JA Peckman 59–105 Washington, DC: Brookings Inst. [Google Scholar]
  94. Hirsh CE. 2009. The strength of weak enforcement: the impact of discrimination charges, legal environments, and organizational conditions on workplace segregation. Am. Sociol. Rev. 74:2245–71 [Google Scholar]
  95. Hutter RRC, Crisp RJ. 2005. The composition of category conjunctions. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 31:5647–57 [Google Scholar]
  96. Kaiser CR, Miller CT. 2003. Derogating the victim: the interpersonal consequences of blaming events on discrimination. Group Process. Intergroup Relat. 6:3227–37 [Google Scholar]
  97. Kalev A, Dobbin F, Kelly E. 2006. Best practices or best guesses? Assessing the efficacy of corporate affirmative action and diversity policies. Am. Sociol. Rev. 71:4589–617 [Google Scholar]
  98. Kang J. 2005. Trojan horses of race. Harvard Law Rev. 118:51489–593 [Google Scholar]
  99. Kanter RM. 1977. Some effects of proportions on group life: skewed sex ratios and responses to token women. Am. J. Sociol. 82:5965–90 [Google Scholar]
  100. Kaufman RL. 2002. Assessing alternative perspectives on race and sex employment segregation. Am. Sociol. Rev. 67:4547–72 [Google Scholar]
  101. Kirschenman J, Neckerman KM. 1991. “We'd love to hire them, but…”: the meaning of race for employers. The Urban Underclass C Jencks, PE Peterson 203–32 Washington, DC: Brookings Inst. [Google Scholar]
  102. Kmec JA, Skaggs SL. 2009. Organizational variation in formal equal employment opportunity structures. Sociol. Forum 24:147–75 [Google Scholar]
  103. Krieger LH. 1995. The content of our categories: a cognitive bias approach to discrimination and equal employment opportunity. Stanford Law Rev. 47:61161–248 [Google Scholar]
  104. Krieger LH. 2004. The intuitive psychologist behind the bench: models of gender bias in social psychology and employment discrimination law. J. Soc. Issues 60:4835–48 [Google Scholar]
  105. Krieger LH, Best RK, Edelman LB. 2015. When “best practices” win, employees lose: symbolic compliance and judicial inference in federal equal employment opportunity cases. Law Soc. Inq. 40:4843–79 [Google Scholar]
  106. Krieger LH, Fiske ST. 2006. Behavioral realism in employment discrimination law: implicit bias and disparate treatment. Calif. Law Rev. 94:4997–1062 [Google Scholar]
  107. Kunda Z, Thagard P. 1996. Forming impressions from stereotypes, traits, and behaviors: a parallel-constraint-satisfaction theory. Psychol. Rev. 103:2284–308 [Google Scholar]
  108. Lamont M, Molnár V. 2002. The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 28:167–95 [Google Scholar]
  109. Luo M. 2009. “Whitening” the résumé. The New York Times Dec. 5 [Google Scholar]
  110. Marshall A-M. 2005a. Confronting Sexual Harassment: The Law and Politics of Everyday Life Burlington, VA: Ashgate [Google Scholar]
  111. Marshall A-M. 2005b. Idle rights: employees' rights consciousness and the construction of sexual harassment policies. Law Soc. Rev. 39:183–124 [Google Scholar]
  112. Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp. 475 U.S. 574 1986.
  113. McCall L. 2005. The complexity of intersectionality. Signs 30:31771–800 [Google Scholar]
  114. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green 411 U.S. 792 1973.
  115. Miller RE, Sarat A. 1980. Grievances, claims, and disputes: assessing the adversary culture. Law Soc. Rev. 15:3/4525–66 [Google Scholar]
  116. Moore PWH. 2010. The tao of pleading: Do Twombly and Iqbal matter empirically?. Am. Univ. Law Rev. 59:553–633 [Google Scholar]
  117. Moran RF, Carbado DW. 2008. Race Law Stories New York: Foundation [Google Scholar]
  118. Moss P, Tilly C. 2001. Stories Employers Tell: Race, Skill, and Hiring in America New York: Russell Sage Found. [Google Scholar]
  119. Neckerman KM, Kirschenman J. 1991. Hiring strategies, racial bias, and inner-city workers. Soc. Probl. 38:4433–47 [Google Scholar]
  120. Nielsen LB, Beim A. 2004. Media misrepresentation: Title VII, print media, and public perceptions of discrimination litigation. Stanford Law Policy Rev. 15:1237–66 [Google Scholar]
  121. Nielsen LB, Nelson RL. 2005. Rights realized? An empirical analysis of employment discrimination litigation as a claiming system. Wis. Law Rev. 2005:663–711 [Google Scholar]
  122. Nielsen LB, Nelson RL, Lancaster R. 2010. Individual justice or collective legal mobilization? Employment discrimination litigation in the post–civil rights United States. J. Empir. Leg. Stud. 7:2175–201 [Google Scholar]
  123. Nielsen LB, Nelson RL, Lancaster R, Pedriana N. 2008. Contesting Workplace Discrimination in Court: Characteristics and Outcomes of Federal Employment Discrimination Litigation 1987–2003 Chicago: Am. Bar Found. [Google Scholar]
  124. Nieva VF, Gutek BA. 1980. Sex effects on evaluation. Acad. Manag. Rev. 5:2267–76 [Google Scholar]
  125. Obasogie OK. 2006. Race in law and society: a critique. Race, Law, and Society IF Haney-López 445–64 Farnham, UK: Ashgate [Google Scholar]
  126. Obasogie OK. 2013. Blinded by Sight: Seeing Race Through the Eyes of the Blind Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  127. Omi M, Winant H. 1994. Racial Formation in the United States: From the 1960s to the 1990s New York: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  128. Pager D. 2003. The mark of a criminal record. Am. J. Sociol. 108:5937–75 [Google Scholar]
  129. Pager D, Quillian L. 2005. Walking the talk? What employers say versus what they do. Am. Sociol. Rev. 70:3355–80 [Google Scholar]
  130. Petersen T, Saporta I, Seidel M-DL. 2000. Offering a job: meritocracy and social networks. Am. J. Sociol. 106:3763–816 [Google Scholar]
  131. Posner RA. 1975. The economic approach to law. Tex. Law Rev. 53:757–82 [Google Scholar]
  132. Quintanilla VD. 2011. Beyond common sense: a social psychological study of Iqbal's effect on claims of race discrimination. Mich. J. Race Law 17:1–62 [Google Scholar]
  133. Reskin BF. 2012. The race discrimination system. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 38:17–35 [Google Scholar]
  134. Reskin BF, Hartmann HI. 1986. Women's Work, Men's Work: Sex Segregation on the Job Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press [Google Scholar]
  135. Reskin BF, McBrier DB. 2000. Why not ascription? Organizations' employment of male and female managers. Am. Sociol. Rev. 65:2210–33 [Google Scholar]
  136. Reskin BF, Ross CE. 1992. Jobs, authority, and earnings among managers: the continuing significance of sex. Work Occup. 19:4342–65 [Google Scholar]
  137. Ridgeway CL. 1997. Interaction and the conservation of gender inequality: considering employment. Am. Sociol. Rev. 62:2218–35 [Google Scholar]
  138. Rivera LA. 2012. Hiring as cultural matching: the case of elite professional service firms. Am. Sociol. Rev. 77:6999–1022 [Google Scholar]
  139. Roithmayr D. 2014. Reproducing Racism: How Everyday Choices Lock in White Advantage New York: N.Y. Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  140. Roma EA. 2004. Mandatory arbitration clauses in employment contracts and the need for meaningful judicial review. J. Gender Soc. Policy Law 12:3519–44 [Google Scholar]
  141. Sanchez-Hucles JV, Davis DD. 2010. Women and women of color in leadership: complexity, identity, and intersectionality. Am. Psychol. 65:3171–81 [Google Scholar]
  142. Skrentny JD. 1996. The Ironies of Affirmative Action: Politics, Culture, and Justice in America Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  143. Skrentny JD. 2002. The Minority Rights Revolution Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  144. Skrentny JD. 2014. After Civil Rights: Racial Realism in the New American Workplace Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  145. Songer DR, Sheehan RS, Haire SB. 1999. Do the “haves” come out ahead over time? Applying Galanter's framework to decisions of the U.S. Courts of Appeals, 1925–1988. Law Soc. Rev. 33:4811–32 [Google Scholar]
  146. St. Mary's Honor Center v. Hicks 509 U.S. 502 1993.
  147. Stainback K, Tomaskovic-Devey D. 2012. Documenting Desegregation: Racial and Gender Segregation in Private Sector Employment Since the Civil Rights Act New York: Russell Sage Found. [Google Scholar]
  148. Stangor C, Lynch L, Duan C, Glas B. 1992. Categorization of individuals on the basis of multiple social features. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 62:2207–18 [Google Scholar]
  149. Stanton W, Cartwright B, Kagan RA, Friedman LM. 1987. Do the “haves” come out ahead? Winning and losing in state supreme courts, 1870–1970. Law Soc. Rev. 21:3403–45 [Google Scholar]
  150. Stone KVW. 1995. Mandatory arbitration of individual employment rights: the yellow dog contract of the 1990s. Denver Univ. Law Rev. 73:1017–50 [Google Scholar]
  151. Sturm S. 2001. Second generation employment discrimination: a structural approach. Columbia Law Rev. 101:3458–568 [Google Scholar]
  152. Sturm S, Guinier L. 1996. The future of affirmative action: reclaiming the innovative ideal. Calif. Law Rev. 84:4953–1036 [Google Scholar]
  153. Sutton JR, Dobbin F, Meyer JW, Scott WR. 1994. The legalization of the workplace. Am. J. Sociol. 99:4944–71 [Google Scholar]
  154. Talesh SA. 2015. Legal intermediaries: how insurance companies construct the meaning of compliance with antidiscrimination laws. Law Policy 37:3209–39 [Google Scholar]
  155. Treiman DJ, Hartmann HI. 1981. Women, Work, and Wages: Equal Pay for Jobs of Equal Value Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press [Google Scholar]
  156. Turner MA, Fix M, Struyk RJ. 1991. Opportunities Denied, Opportunities Diminished: Racial Discrimination in Hiring Washington, DC: Urban Inst. [Google Scholar]
  157. Villazor RC. 2008. Blood quantum land laws and the race versus political identity dilemma. Calif. Law Rev. 96:3801–37 [Google Scholar]
  158. Weinberg JD, Nielsen LB. 2011. Examining empathy: discrimination, experience, and judicial decisionmaking. South. Calif. Law Rev. 85:2313–52 [Google Scholar]
  159. Williams CL. 1992. The glass escalator: hidden advantages for men in the “female” professions. Soc. Probl. 39:3253–67 [Google Scholar]
  160. Yoder JD. 1991. Rethinking tokenism: looking beyond numbers. Gender Soc 5:2178–92 [Google Scholar]
  161. Yoder JD, Sinnett LM. 1985. Is it all in the numbers?: A case study of tokenism. Psychol. Women Q. 9:3413–18 [Google Scholar]
  162. Yoshino K. 2002. Covering. Yale Law J. 111:4769–939 [Google Scholar]
  163. Yoshino K. 2006. Covering: The Hidden Assault on Our Civil Rights New York: Random House [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110615-085234
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error