Global Scripts in Transnational Legal Orders and Governance

Literature Cited

1. Abbott KW, Snidal D. 2000. Hard and soft law in international governance. Int. Organ. 54:3421–56
   [Google Scholar]
2. Abebe D, Chilton A, Ginsburg T. 2021. The social science approach to international law. Chic. J. Int. Law 22:11–23
   [Google Scholar]
3. Ali SF. 2021. Forming Transnational Dispute Settlement Norms: Soft Law and the Role of UNCITRAL's Regional Centre for Asia and the Pacific Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publ.
4. Babb S. 2012. The Washington Consensus as transnational policy paradigm: its origins, trajectory and likely successor. Rev. Int. Political Econ. 20:2268–97
   [Google Scholar]
5. Babb S, Kentikelenis A. 2021. Markets everywhere: the Washington Consensus and the sociology of global institutional change. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 47:521–41
   [Google Scholar]
6. Ballestero A. 2019. A Future History of Water. Raleigh-Durham, SC: Duke Univ. Press
7. Barnett M, Finnemore M. 2001. Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
8. Beckfield J. 2010. The social structure of the world polity. Am. J. Sociol. 115:41018–68
   [Google Scholar]
9. Beer CT. 2016. Expansive and complex pathways to world society: the global connections of Kenyan environmental organizations and their support for climate change scripts. Sociol. Perspect. 59:2419–40
   [Google Scholar]
10. Berger PL, Luckmann T. 1967. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge New York: Anchor Books
11. Berry K. 2003. Developing women: the traffic in ideas about women and their needs in Kangra, India. Regional Modernities: The Cultural Politics of Development in India K Sivaramakrishnan, A Agrawal 75–98 Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
12. Block-Lieb S. 2019. Soft and hard strategies: the role of business in the crafting of international commercial law. Mich. J. Int. Law 40:3433–77
    [Google Scholar]
13. Block-Lieb S, Halliday TC. 2016. Contracts and private law in the emerging ecology of international lawmaking. Contracting Beyond Borders: The Law of International Markets in the Twentieth Century G Mallard, J Sgard Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
14. Block-Lieb S, Halliday TC. 2017. Global Lawmakers: International Organizations and the Crafting of World Markets Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
15. Block-Lieb S, Halliday TC. 2022. The macropolitics and microeconomics of global financial crises: bankruptcy as a point of reference. Sovereign Insolvency: Possible Legal Solutions J Garasic, N Bodiroga-Vukobrat New York: Springer
    [Google Scholar]
16. Bodansky D, Brunnée J, Hey E, eds. 2007. The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
17. Boli J, Thomas GM. 1999. Constructing World Culture: International Nongovernmental Organizations Since 1875 Stanford, UK: Stanford Univ. Press
18. Braithwaite J, Drahos P. 2000. Global Business Regulation Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
19. Broome A, Seabrooke L. 2021. Recursive recognition in the international political economy. Rev. Int. Political Econ. 28:2369–81
    [Google Scholar]
20. Campbell JL. 2004. Institutional Change and Globalization Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
21. Canfield M. 2018. Banana brokers: communicative labor, translocal translation, and transnational law. Public Cult. 31:169–92
    [Google Scholar]
22. Carruthers BG, Halliday TC. 2006. Negotiating globalization: global scripts and intermediation in the construction of Asian insolvency regimes. . Law Soc. Inq. 31:3521–84
    [Google Scholar]
23. Chorev N. 2012. The World Health Organization: Between North and South Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
24. Chua LJ. 2015. The vernacular mobilization of human rights in Myanmar's sexual orientation and gender identity movement. Law Soc. Rev. 49:2299–332
    [Google Scholar]
25. Davis S, Shaffer G. 2020. Theorizing transnational fiduciary law. UC-Irvine J. Int. Transnatl. Comp. Law 5:1–53
    [Google Scholar]
26. Djelic M-L, Sahlin-Andersson K. 2006. Transnational Governance: Institutional Dynamics of Regulation Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
27. Dobbin F, Simmons BA, Garrett G. 2007. The global diffusion of public policies: Social construction, coercion, competition, or learning?. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 33:449–72
    [Google Scholar]
28. Drori I, Honig B, Sheaffer Z. 2009. The life cycle of an Internet firm: scripts, legitimacy, and identity. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 33:3571–92
    [Google Scholar]
29. Drori GS, Meyer JW 2006. Global scientization: an environment for expanded organization. Globalization and Organization: World Society and Organizational Change GS Drori, JW Meyer, H Hwang 50–68 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
30. Drori GS, Meyer JW. 2009. Scientization: making a world safe for organizing. See Djelic & Sahlin-Andersson 2006 31–52
31. Durkee MJ. 2019. Recent books on international law: Global Lawmakers: International Organizations in the Crafting of World Markets. Am. J. Int. Law 113:2422–28
    [Google Scholar]
32. Fiss PC, Zajac EJ. 2006. The symbolic management of strategic change: sensegiving via framing and decoupling. Acad. Manag. J. 49:61173–93
    [Google Scholar]
33. Foster LA. 2014. Critical cultural translation: a socio-legal framework for regulatory orders. Indiana J. Glob. Legal Stud. 21:179–105
    [Google Scholar]
34. Gillespie JS. 2012. Relocating global legal scripts in local networks of meaning. Law and Development and the Global Discourses of Legal Transfers J Gillespie, P Nicholson 9–55 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press. , 1st ed..
    [Google Scholar]
35. Gillespie JS, Peerenboom R, eds. 2009. Regulation in Asia: Pushing Back on Globalization Abingdon-on-Thames, UK: Routledge Publ.
36. Hale T, Held D. 2011. The Handbook of Transnational Governance: Institutions and Innovations Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Publ.
37. Halliday TC. 2009. Recursivity of global normmaking: a sociolegal agenda. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 5:263–89
    [Google Scholar]
38. Halliday TC, Block-Lieb S. 2012. Global duelists: the recursive politics of the text in international trade law. See Perry-Kessaris 2012 77–97
39. Halliday TC, Block-Lieb S, Carruthers BG. 2010. Rhetorical legitimation: global scripts as strategic devices on international organizations. Socio-Econ. Rev. 8:177–112
    [Google Scholar]
40. Halliday TC, Carruthers BG. 2007. The recursivity of law: global norm making and national lawmaking in the globalization of corporate insolvency regimes. Am. J. Sociol. 112:41135–202
    [Google Scholar]
41. Halliday TC, Carruthers BG. 2009. Bankrupt: Global Lawmaking and Systemic Financial Crisis Stanford, UK: Stanford Univ. Press
42. Halliday TC, Osinsky P. 2006. Globalization of law. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 32:447–70
    [Google Scholar]
43. Halliday TC, Pacewicz J, Block-Lieb S. 2013. Who governs? Delegations in global trade lawmaking. Regul. Gov. 7:279–98
    [Google Scholar]
44. Halliday TC, Shaffer G, eds. 2015. Transnational Legal Orders Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
45. Halliday TC, Zilberstein S, Espeland W. 2021. Protecting basic legal freedoms: international legal complexes, accountability devices, and the deviant case of China. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 17:159–80
    [Google Scholar]
46. Halme-Tuomisaari M. 2016. Toward a lasting anthropology of international law/governance. Eur. J. Int. Law 27:1235–43 [Review of Eslava L 2014. Local Space, Global Life: the Everyday Operation of International Law and Development Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press ]
    [Google Scholar]
47. Held D, Koenig-Archibugi M, eds. 2005. Global Governance and Public Accountability Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell Publ.
48. Helleiner E. 2015. Regulating the regulators: the emergence and limits of the transnational financial legal order. See Halliday & Shaffer 2015 231–57
49. Hetherington K. 2014. Regular soybeans: translation and framing in the ontological politics of coup. Indiana J. Glob. Legal Stud. 21:155–78
    [Google Scholar]
50. Hironaka A. 2014. Greening the Globe: World Society and Environmental Change Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
51. Hughes MM, Peterson L, Harrison JA, Paxton P. 2009. Power and relation in the world polity: the INGO Network Country Score, 1978–1998. Soc. Forces 87:41711–42
    [Google Scholar]
52. Igelsböck J, Schüßler E. 2019. New directions for the concept of the institutional script Pap. 9, Nano-Papers: Institution—Organization—Society, Ger. Res. Netw. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331960272_New_Directions_for_the_Concept_of_the_Institutional_Script
53. Jupille J, Jolliff B, Wojcik S. 2013. Regionalism in the world polity Work. Pap., Univ. Colo., Boulder. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2242500
    [Crossref]
54. Kaplan S. 2008. Framing contests: strategy making under uncertainty. Organ. Sci. 19:5729–52
    [Google Scholar]
55. Kaye D, Shaffer G. 2021. Transnational legal ordering of data, disinformation, privacy, and speech. UC-Irvine J. Int. Transnatl. Comp. Law 6:1–7
    [Google Scholar]
56. Kentikelenis AE, Seabrooke L. 2017. The politics of world polity: script-writing in international organizations. Am. Sociol. Rev. 82:51065–92
    [Google Scholar]
57. Kim RE. 2020. Is global governance fragmented, polycentric, or complex? The state of the art of the network approach. Int. Stud. Rev. 22:903–31
    [Google Scholar]
58. Koenig-Archibugi M, Zürn M, eds. 2006. New Modes of Governance in the Global System: Exploring Publicness, Delegation and Inclusiveness London: Palgrave Macmillan
59. Levi-Faur D 2012. The Oxford Handbook of Governance Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
60. Liu LJ. 2021. The rules of the (belt and) road: how lawyers participate in China's outbound investment and infrastructure initiatives. Yale J. Int. Law Online 46:168–96
    [Google Scholar]
61. Lloyd P, Simmons BA. 2015. Framing for a new transnational legal order: the case of human trafficking. See Halliday & Shaffer 2015 400–38
62. Lopez-Claros A, Dahl AL, Groff M, eds. 2020. Global Governance and the Emergence of Global Institutions for the 21st Century Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
63. Lounsbury M, Glynn MA. 2001. Cultural entrepreneurship: stories, legitimacy and the acquisition of resources. Strateg. Manag. J. 22:6–7545–64
    [Google Scholar]
64. Luckmann T. 2002. Moral communication in modern societies. Hum. Stud. 25:119–32
    [Google Scholar]
65. Merry SE. 2003. Rights talk and the experience of law: implementing women's human rights to protection from violence. Hum. Rights Q. 25:2343–81
    [Google Scholar]
66. Merry SE. 2005. Human Rights and Gender Violence: Translating International Law in Local Justice Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
67. Merry SE. 2006a. Anthropology and international law. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 35:99–116
    [Google Scholar]
68. Merry SE. 2006b. Transnational human rights and local activism: mapping the middle. Am. Anthropol. 108:138–51
    [Google Scholar]
69. Meyer JW, Boli J, Thomas GM, Ramirez FO. 1997. World society and the nation-state. Am. J. Sociol. 103:1144–81
    [Google Scholar]
70. Meyer JW, Rowan B. 1977. Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. Am. J. Sociol. 83:2340–63
    [Google Scholar]
71. Paiement P. 2020. Urgent agenda: how climate litigation builds transnational narratives. Transnatl. Legal Theory 11:1–2121–43
    [Google Scholar]
72. Paiement P, Melchers S. 2020. Finding international law in private governance: how codes of conduct in the apparel industry refer to international instruments. Indiana J. Glob. Legal Stud. 27:2303–45
    [Google Scholar]
73. Perry-Kessaris A 2012. Socio-Legal Approaches to International Economic Law: Text, Context, Subtext Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge
74. Peters A, Köchlin L, Zinkernagel GF. 2010. Non-State Actors as Standard Setters Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
75. Pierotti RS. 2013. Increasing rejection of intimate partner violence: evidence of global cultural diffusion. Am. Sociol. Rev. 78:2240–65
    [Google Scholar]
76. Rajamani L, Peel C, eds. 2021. The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press. , 2nd ed..
77. Rautalin M, Syväterä J, Vento E. 2021. International organizations establishing their scientific authority: periodizing the legitimation of policy advice by the OECD. Int. Sociol. 36:13–24
    [Google Scholar]
78. Roger C, Dauvergne P. 2016. The rise of transnational governance as a field of study. Int. Stud. Rev. 18:415–37
    [Google Scholar]
79. Rosenau JN. 1995. Governance in the twenty-first century: global governance. Glob. Gov. 1:113–43
    [Google Scholar]
80. Seabrooke L, Sending OJ. 2020. Contracting development: managerialism and consultants in intergovernmental organizations. Rev. Int. Political Econ. 27:4802–27
    [Google Scholar]
81. Shaffer GC 2012. Transnational Legal Ordering and State Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
82. Shaffer GC, Aaronson E 2020. Transnational Legal Ordering of Criminal Justice Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
83. Shaffer GC, Ginsburg T. 2012. The empirical turn in international legal scholarship. Am. J. Int. Law 106:1–47
    [Google Scholar]
84. Shaffer GC, Ginsburg T, Halliday TC, eds. 2019. Constitution-Making as Transnational Legal Ordering Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
85. Shaffer GC, Pollack MA. 2010. Hard versus soft law: alternatives, complements and antagonists in international governance. Minn. Law Rev. 94:706–99
    [Google Scholar]
86. Shaffer GC, Waibel M 2015. The rise and fall of trade and monetary legal orders: from the interwar period to today's global imbalances. Contractual Knowledge: One Hundred Years of Legal Experimentation in Global Markets G Mallard, J Sgard 1–58 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
87. Sheng A. 2009. From Asian to Global Financial Crisis: An Asian Regulator's View of Unfettered Finance in the 1990s and 2000s. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
88. Spence M. 2021. Some thoughts on the Washington Consensus and subsequent global development experience. . J. Econ. Perspect. 35:367–82
    [Google Scholar]
89. Suchman MC. 1995. Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. Acad. Manag. Rev. 20:3571–610
    [Google Scholar]
90. Suddaby R, Greenwood R. 2005. Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Adm. Sci. Q. 40:135–67
    [Google Scholar]
91. Tan C. 2019. Beyond the ‘moments’ of law and development: critical reflections on law and development scholarship in a globalized economy. Law Dev. Rev. 12:2285–321
    [Google Scholar]
92. Teixeira RG. 2021. The role of international organizations in the development of international environmental law: adjusting the lenses of analysis. Case Western Reserve J. Int. Law 53:1237–68
    [Google Scholar]
93. Zumbansen P. 2012. Defining the space of transnational law: legal theory, global governance, and legal pluralism. Indiana J. Glob. Legal Stud. 21:1–26
    [Google Scholar]
94. Zwingel S. 2012. How do norms travel? Theorizing international women's rights in transnational perspective. Int. Stud. Q. 56:1115–29
    [Google Scholar]