Police Go to Court: Police Officers as Witnesses/Defendants

Literature Cited

1. Abel J. 2015. Brady’s blind spot: impeachment information in police personnel files and the battle splitting the prosecution team. Stanford Law Rev. 67:743–808
   [Google Scholar]
2. Abel J. 2022. Cop tracing. Cornell Law Rev. 107:102–86
   [Google Scholar]
3. Alpert GP, Noble JJ. 2009. Lies, true lies, and conscious deception. Police Q. 12:237–54
   [Google Scholar]
4. Armacost BE. 2019. Police shootings: Is accountability the enemy of prevention?. Ohio State Law J. 80:907–86
   [Google Scholar]
5. Baude W. 2018. Is qualified immunity unlawful?. Calif. Law Rev. 106:45–88
   [Google Scholar]
6. Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 1963.)
7. Capers B. 2008. Crime, legitimacy and testilying. Indiana Law J. 83:835–80
   [Google Scholar]
8. Chappell AT, Lanza-Kaduce L. 2010. Police academy socialization: understanding the lessons learned in a paramilitary-bureaucratic organization. J. Contemp. Ethnogr. 39:187–214
   [Google Scholar]
9. Chavis Simmons K. 2015. Increasing police accountability: restoring trust and legitimacy through the appointment of independent prosecutors. Wash. Univ. J. Law Policy 49:137–58
   [Google Scholar]
10. Chicago Torture Justice Mem 2022. The Burge case. https://chicagotorture.org/reparations/history/
11. Chin GJ. 2017. The problematic prosecution of an Asian American police officer: notes from a participant in People v. . Peter Liang. Georgia Law Rev. 51:1023–45
    [Google Scholar]
12. Chin GJ, Wells SC. 1998. The “blue wall of silence” as evidence of bias and motive to lie: a new approach to police perjury. Univ. Pittsburgh Law Rev. 59:233–99
    [Google Scholar]
13. Cox K, Spielvogel W. 2022. Police misconduct records secret, difficult to access. Associated Press Jan. 24. https://pulitzercenter.org/stories/police-misconduct-records-secret-difficult-access
    [Google Scholar]
14. Dorfman DN. 1998. Proving the lie: litigating police credibility. Am. J. Crim. Law 26:455–503
    [Google Scholar]
15. Dukes K, Kahn K. 2017. What social science research says about police violence against racial and ethnic minorities: understanding the antecedents and consequences. J. Soc. Issues 73:690–700
    [Google Scholar]
16. Fallon RH Jr. 2019. Bidding farewell to constitutional torts. Calif. Law Rev. 107:933–97
    [Google Scholar]
17. Floyd v. City of New York, 959 F. Supp. 2d 540 (SDNY 2013.)
18. Friedman B. 2017. Why do courts defer to cops. Harvard Law Rev. Forum 130:323–32
    [Google Scholar]
19. Galanter M. 1974. Why the “haves” come out ahead: speculations on the limits of legal change. Law Soc. Rev. 9:195–160
    [Google Scholar]
20. Green BA, Roiphe R. 2017. Rethinking prosecutors’ conflicts of interest. Boston Coll. Law Rev. 58:463–538
    [Google Scholar]
21. Hendricks A. 2021. Exposing police misconduct in pre-trial criminal proceedings. NYU J. Legis. Public Policy 24:177–246
    [Google Scholar]
22. Hoag A. 2021. Abolition as the solution: redress for victims of police excessive force. Fordham Urban Law J. 48:721–43
    [Google Scholar]
23. Hogan T. 2020. Officer-involved shooting investigations demystified: slashing through the Gordian knot. Drexel Law Rev. 13:1–85
    [Google Scholar]
24. Horowitz R. 2013. In the Public Interest: Medical Licensing and the Disciplinary Process New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univ. Press
25. Hunt J, Manning PK. 1991. The social context of police lying. Symb. Interact. 14:51–70
    [Google Scholar]
26. Jacobi J. 2000. Prosecuting police misconduct. Wis. Law Rev. 2000:789–853
    [Google Scholar]
27. Jain A, Sinclair R, Papachristos AV. 2022. Identifying misconduct-committing officer crews in the Chicago Police Department. PLOS ONE 17:5e0267217
    [Google Scholar]
28. Johnson VB. 2017. Bias in blue: instructing jurors to consider the testimony of police officer witnesses with caution. Pepperdine Law Rev. 44:245–304
    [Google Scholar]
29. Johnson VB. 2019. KKK in the PD: white supremacist police and what to do about it. Lewis Clark Law Rev. 23:205–43
    [Google Scholar]
30. Levenson L. 2021. Whose rights matter more: Police privacy or a defendant's right to a fair trial?. Loyola Law Rev. 54:495–513
    [Google Scholar]
31. Levin B. 2023. After the criminal justice system. Wash. Law Rev. In press
    [Google Scholar]
32. Levin LC. 2007. The case for less secrecy in lawyer discipline. Georgetown J. Legal Ethics 20:1–50
    [Google Scholar]
33. Levine K. 2016a. How we prosecute the police. Georgetown Law J. 104:745–76
    [Google Scholar]
34. Levine K. 2016b. Police suspects. Columbia Law Rev. 116:1197–258
    [Google Scholar]
35. Levine K. 2016c. Who shouldn't prosecute the police. Iowa Law Rev. 101:1447–96
    [Google Scholar]
36. Levine K. 2021. Police prosecutions and punitive instincts. Wash. Univ. Law Rev. 98:997–1057
    [Google Scholar]
37. Lvovsky A. 2017. The judicial presumption of police expertise. Harvard Law Rev. 130:1995–2081
    [Google Scholar]
38. Lvovsky A. 2021. Rethinking police expertise. Yale Law J. 131:475–572
    [Google Scholar]
39. McCartney S, Parent R. 2015. Ethics in Law Enforcement Victoria, Can.: BCcampus http://opentextbc.ca/ethicsinlawenforcement/
40. Moran R. 2017. In police we trust. Villanova Law Rev. 62:953–1003
    [Google Scholar]
41. Moran R. 2018. Contesting police credibility. Wash. Law Rev. 93:1339–96
    [Google Scholar]
42. Moran R. 2019. Police privacy. Univ. Calif.-Irvine Law Rev. 10:153–98
    [Google Scholar]
43. Moran R. 2022. Brady lists. Minn. Law Rev. 107:657–733
    [Google Scholar]
44. Nielson AL, Walker CJ. 2018. A qualified defense of qualified immunity. Notre Dame Law Rev. 93:1853–85
    [Google Scholar]
45. Orfield MW Jr. 1992. Deterrence, perjury, and the heater factor: an exclusionary rule in the Chicago criminal courts. Colo. Law Rev. 63:75–161
    [Google Scholar]
46. Paoline E III. 2003. Taking stock: toward a richer understanding of police culture. J. Crim. Justice 31:199–214
    [Google Scholar]
47. Patel S. 2020. Jumping hurdles to sue the police. Minn. Law Rev. 104:2257–374
    [Google Scholar]
48. Ravenell T. 2022. Unidentified police officials. Tex. Law Rev. 100:891–939
    [Google Scholar]
49. Schrader S. 2021. The lies cops tell and the lies we tell about cops. The New Republic May 27. https://newrepublic.com/article/162510/cops-lie-public-safety-defund-the-police
    [Google Scholar]
50. Schwartz JC. 2014. Police indemnification. NYU Law Rev. 89:885–1001
    [Google Scholar]
51. Schwartz JC. 2017. How qualified immunity fails. Yale Law J. 127:2–76
    [Google Scholar]
52. Schwartz JC. 2018. The case against qualified immunity. Notre Dame Law Rev. 93:1797–840
    [Google Scholar]
53. Seron C, Munger F. 1996. Law and inequality: race, gender…and, of course, class. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 22:187–212
    [Google Scholar]
54. Sierra-Areévalo M. 2021. American policing and the danger imperative. Law Soc. Rev. 55:170–103
    [Google Scholar]
55. Simon-Kerr J. 2015. Systemic lying. William Mary Law Rev. 56:2175–233
    [Google Scholar]
56. Singh D. 2022. The causes of police corruption and working towards prevention in conflict-stricken states. Laws 11:569
    [Google Scholar]
57. Skogan WG, Meares TL. 2004. Lawful policing. Ann. Am. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 593:66–83
    [Google Scholar]
58. Skolnick JH. 1982. Deception by police. Crim. Justice Ethics 1:240–54
    [Google Scholar]
59. Slobogin C. 1996. Testilying: police perjury and what to do about it. Colo. Law Rev. 67:1037–60
    [Google Scholar]
60. Trivedi S, Gonzalez Van Cleve N. 2020. To serve and protect each other: how police-prosecutor codependence enables police misconduct. Boston Univ. Law Rev. 100:895–933
    [Google Scholar]
61. Wilson M. 2010. An exclusionary rule for police lies. Am. Crim. Law Rev. 47:1–55
    [Google Scholar]
62. Wood G, Roithmayr D, Papachristos AV. 2019. The network structure of police misconduct. Socius 5: https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023119879798
    [Google Scholar]
63. Woolhandler A. 1987. Patterns of official immunity and accountability. Case Western Reserve Law Rev. 37:396–483
    [Google Scholar]
64. Zeidman S. 2005. Policing the police: the role of the courts and the prosecution. Fordham Urban Law J. 32:315–53
    [Google Scholar]