1932

Abstract

Research over the past decade has made considerable progress toward achieving a holistic understanding of the myriad actors, interests, and relationships shaping labor rights in global supply chains, but numerous obstacles remain to building a more cumulative research program. In this essay we outline two major challenges and several fruitful directions forward. First, we review the different outcomes of interest in research on labor rights and highlight several tensions that lead to difficulty comparing findings across studies, inappropriate data choices, and unexamined causal assumptions. Second, we highlight a failure to adequately integrate the findings of research in two different subliteratures, one focusing on the incentives of states and firms to adopt reforms, and a second focusing on the implementation of those reforms with monitoring and enforcement mechanisms. We conclude by highlighting the important questions raised by a clearer integration of these two literatures and identifying several recent studies that begin to answer them.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-120814-121322
2015-11-03
2024-05-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/lawsocsci/11/1/annurev-lawsocsci-120814-121322.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-120814-121322&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Amengual M. 2010. Complementary labor regulation: the uncoordinated combination of state and private regulators in the Dominican Republic. World Dev. 38:3405–14 [Google Scholar]
  2. Amengual M. 2014. Pathways to enforcement: labor inspectors leveraging linkages with society in Argentina. Ind. Labor Relat. Rev. 67:13–33 [Google Scholar]
  3. Anner M. 2011. Solidarity Transformed: Labor Responses to Globalization and Crisis in Latin America Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
  4. Anner M. 2012. Corporate social responsibility and freedom of association rights: the precarious quest for legitimacy and control in global supply chains. Polit. Soc. 40:4609–44 [Google Scholar]
  5. Anner M, Caraway T. 2010. International institutions and workers' rights: between labor standards and market flexibility. Stud. Comp. Int. Dev. 45:2151–69 [Google Scholar]
  6. Auld G. 2014. Constructing Private Governance: The Rise and Evolution of Forest, Coffee, and Fisheries Certification New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  7. Baccini L, Koenig-Archibugi M. 2014. Why do states commit to international labor standards? Interdependent ratification of core ILO conventions, 1948–2009. World Polit. 66:3446–90 [Google Scholar]
  8. Barrientos S, Gereffi G, Rossi A. 2011. Economic and social upgrading in global production networks: a new paradigm for a changing world. Int. Labour Rev. 150:3–4319–40 [Google Scholar]
  9. Barrientos S, Smith S. 2007. Do workers benefit from ethical trade? Assessing codes of labour practice in global production systems. Third World Q. 28:4713–29 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bartley T. 2005. Corporate accountability and the privatization of labor standards: struggles over codes of conduct in the apparel industry. Res. Polit. Sociol. 14:211–44 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bartley T. 2007. Institutional emergence in an era of globalization: the rise of transnational private regulation of labor and environmental conditions. Am. J. Sociol. 113:2297–351 [Google Scholar]
  12. Berliner D, Greenleaf A, Lake M, Levi M, Noveck J. 2015a. Labor Standards in International Supply Chains: Aligning Rights and Incentives London: Edward Elgar
  13. Berliner D, Greenleaf A, Lake M, Noveck J. 2015b. Building capacity, building rights? State capacity and labor rights in developing countries. World Dev. 72:127–39 [Google Scholar]
  14. Berliner D, Prakash A. 2012. From norms to programs: the United Nations Global Compact and global governance. Regul. Gov. 6:2149–66 [Google Scholar]
  15. Berliner D, Prakash A. 2013. Signaling environmental stewardship in the shadow of weak governance: the global diffusion of ISO 14001. Law Soc. Rev. 47:2345–73 [Google Scholar]
  16. Berliner D, Prakash A. 2015. ‘Bluewashing’ the firm?: voluntary regulations, program design and member compliance with the United Nations Global Compact. Policy Stud. J. 43:115–38 [Google Scholar]
  17. Bernhagen P, Mitchell N. 2010. The private provision of public goods: corporate commitments and the United Nations Global Compact. Int. Stud. Q. 54:41175–87 [Google Scholar]
  18. Bhagwati J. 2007. In Defense of Globalization: With a New Afterword Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press Reprint ed.
  19. Bhorat H, Kanbur R, Mayet N. 2012. Estimating the causal effect of enforcement on minimum wage compliance: the case of South Africa. Rev. Dev. Econ. 16:4608–23 [Google Scholar]
  20. Blanton R, Blanton S. 2012. Labor rights and foreign direct investment: Is there a race to the bottom?. Int. Interact. 38:3267–94 [Google Scholar]
  21. Bondy K, Matten D, Moon J. 2008. Multinational corporation codes of conduct: Governance tools for corporate social responsibility?. Corp. Gov. Int. Rev. 16:4294–311 [Google Scholar]
  22. Büthe T. 2010. Private regulation in the global economy: a (p)review. Bus. Polit. 12:31–38 [Google Scholar]
  23. Caraway TL. 2010. Labor standards and labor market flexibility in East Asia. Stud. Comp. Int. Dev. 45:2225–49 [Google Scholar]
  24. Caraway TL, Rickard SJ, Anner MS. 2012. International negotiations and domestic politics: the case of IMF labor market conditionality. Int. Organ. 66:127–61 [Google Scholar]
  25. Chan A. 2003. Racing to the bottom: international trade without a social clause. Third World Q. 24:61011–28 [Google Scholar]
  26. Chan J, Pun N, Selden M. 2013. The politics of global production: Apple, Foxconn and China's new working class. New Technol. Work Employ. 28:2100–15 [Google Scholar]
  27. Cingranelli D, Richards D, Clay C. 2014. The Cingranelli-Richards (CIRI) Human Rights Data Project Coding Manual. http://www.humanrightsdata.com/p/data-documentation.html [Google Scholar]
  28. Cole WM. 2013. Strong walk and cheap talk: the effect of the international covenant of economic, social, and cultural rights on policies and practices. Soc. Forces 92:1165–94 [Google Scholar]
  29. Coslovsky SV. 2014. Flying under the radar? The state and the enforcement of labour laws in Brazil. Oxf. Dev. Stud. 42:2190–216 [Google Scholar]
  30. Coslovsky SV, Locke R. 2013. Parallel paths to enforcement: private compliance, public regulation, and labor standards in the Brazilian sugar sector. Polit. Soc. 41:4497–526 [Google Scholar]
  31. Davies RB, Vadlamannati KC. 2013. A race to the bottom in labor standards? An empirical investigation. J. Dev. Econ. 103:July1–14 [Google Scholar]
  32. Distelhorst G, Locke R, Pal T, Samel H. 2015. Production goes global, compliance stays local: private regulation in the global electronics industry. Regul. Gov. In press
  33. Drezner DW. 2001. Globalization and policy convergence. Int. Stud. Rev. 3:153–78 [Google Scholar]
  34. Elliott KA, Freeman RB. 2003. Can Labor Standards Improve under Globalization? Washington, DC: Peterson Inst. Int. Econ.
  35. Fariss CJ. 2014. Respect for human rights has improved over time: modeling the changing standard of accountability. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 108:02297–318 [Google Scholar]
  36. Friedman E. 2014. Insurgency Trap: Labor Politics in Postsocialist China Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
  37. Gallagher ME, Giles J, Park A, Wang M. 2013. China's 2008 labor contract law: implementation and implications for China's workers Policy Res. Work. Pap. WPS6542, World Bank, Washington, DC
  38. Greenhill B, Mosley L, Prakash A. 2009. Trade-based diffusion of labor rights: a panel study, 1986–2002. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 103:4669–90 [Google Scholar]
  39. Gwartney J, Lawson R. 2012. Economic Freedom of the World Index Vancouver, CA: Fraser Inst http://www.freetheworld.com/
  40. Hafner-Burton EM. 2005. Trading human rights: how preferential trade agreements influence government repression. Int. Organ. 59:03593–629 [Google Scholar]
  41. Hassel A. 2008. The evolution of a global labor governance regime. Governance 21:2231–51 [Google Scholar]
  42. Helfer LR. 2008. Monitoring compliance with unratified treaties: the ILO experience. Law Contemp. Probl. 71:2193 [Google Scholar]
  43. Hill DW, Moore WH, Mukherjee B. 2013. Information politics versus organizational incentives: When are Amnesty International's “naming and shaming” reports biased?. Int. Stud. Q. 57:2219–32 [Google Scholar]
  44. Kahn-Nisser S. 2013. Conditionality, communication and compliance: the effect of monitoring on collective labour rights in candidate countries. J. Common Market Stud. 51:61040–56 [Google Scholar]
  45. Kahn-Nisser S. 2014. External governance, convention ratification and monitoring: the EU, the ILO and labour standards in EU accession countries. Eur. J. Ind. Relat. 20:4383–98 [Google Scholar]
  46. Kang SL. 2012. Human Rights and Labor Solidarity: Trade Unions in the Global Economy Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press
  47. Kim M. 2012. Ex ante due diligence: formation of PTAs and protection of labor rights. Int. Stud. Q. 56:4704–19 [Google Scholar]
  48. Kim JY. 2013. The politics of code enforcement and implementation in Vietnam's apparel and footwear factories. World Dev. 45:C286–95 [Google Scholar]
  49. Kolben K. 2004. Trade, monitoring, and the ILO: working to improve conditions in Cambodia's garment factories. Yale Hum. Rights Dev. Law J. 7:79–107 [Google Scholar]
  50. Kucera D. 2002. Core labour standards and foreign direct investment. Int. Labour Rev. 141:1–231–69 [Google Scholar]
  51. Lim S, Mosley L, Prakash A. 2015. Revenue substitution? How foreign aid inflows moderate the effect of bilateral trade pressures on labor rights. World Dev. 67:March295–309 [Google Scholar]
  52. Locke R, Amengual M, Mangla A. 2009. Virtue out of necessity? Compliance, commitment, and the improvement of labor conditions in global supply chains. Polit. Soc. 37:3319–51 [Google Scholar]
  53. Locke RM. 2013. The Promise and Limits of Private Power: Promoting Labor Standards in a Global Economy Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press
  54. Locke RM, Qin F, Brause A. 2007. Does monitoring improve labor standards? Lessons from Nike. Ind. Labor Relat. Rev. 61:13–31 [Google Scholar]
  55. Locke RM, Rissing B, Pal T. 2013. Complements or substitutes? Private codes, state regulation and the enforcement of labour standards in global supply chains. Br. J. Ind. Relat. 51:3519–52 [Google Scholar]
  56. Locke RM, Romis M. 2010. The promise and perils of private voluntary regulation: labor standards and work organization in two Mexican garment factories. Rev. Int. Polit. Econ. 17:145–74 [Google Scholar]
  57. Mayer F, Gereffi G. 2010. Regulation and economic globalization: prospects and limits of private governance. Bus. Polit. 12:311 [Google Scholar]
  58. Mosley L. 2008. Workers' rights in open economies global production and domestic institutions in the developing world. Comp. Polit. Stud. 41:4–5674–714 [Google Scholar]
  59. Mosley L. 2010. Labor Rights and Multinational Production Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press
  60. Mosley L, Uno S. 2007. Racing to the bottom or climbing to the top? Economic globalization and collective labor rights. Comp. Polit. Stud. 40:8923–48 [Google Scholar]
  61. Murillo MV. 2005. Partisanship amidst convergence: the politics of labor reform in Latin America. Comp. Polit. 37:4441–58 [Google Scholar]
  62. Murillo MV, Schrank A. 2005. With a little help from my friends: partisan politics, transnational alliances, and labor rights in Latin America. Comp. Polit. Stud. 38:8971–99 [Google Scholar]
  63. Mwangi W, Rieth L, Schmitz HP. 2013. Encouraging greater compliance: local networks and the United Nations Global Compact. The Persistent Power of Human Rights: From Commitment to Compliance T Risse, SC Ropp, K Sikkink 203–21 Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  64. Oka C. 2010. Accounting for the gaps in labour standard compliance: the role of reputation-conscious buyers in the Cambodian garment industry. Eur. J. Dev. Res. 22:159–78 [Google Scholar]
  65. Payton AL, Woo B. 2014. Attracting investment: governments' strategic role in labor rights protection. Int. Stud. Q. 58:3462–74 [Google Scholar]
  66. Piore MJ, Schrank A. 2008. Toward managed flexibility: the revival of labour inspection in the Latin world. Int. Labour Rev. 147:11–23 [Google Scholar]
  67. Pires R. 2008. Promoting sustainable compliance: styles of labour inspection and compliance outcomes in Brazil. Int. Labour Rev. 147:2–3199–229 [Google Scholar]
  68. Polaski S. 2006. Combining global and local forces: the case of labor rights in Cambodia. World Dev. 34:5919–32 [Google Scholar]
  69. Postnikov E, Bastiaens I. 2014. Does dialogue work? The effectiveness of labor standards in EU preferential trade agreements. J. Eur. Public Policy 21:6923–40 [Google Scholar]
  70. Potoski M, Prakash A. 2009. Voluntary Programs: A Club Theory Perspective Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  71. Potrafke N. 2013. Globalization and labor market institutions: international empirical evidence. J. Comp. Econ. 41:3829–42 [Google Scholar]
  72. Prakash A, Gugerty MK. 2010. Advocacy Organizations and Collective Action Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press
  73. Preuss L. 2009. Ethical sourcing codes of large UK-based corporations: prevalence, content, limitations. J. Bus. Ethics 88:4735–47 [Google Scholar]
  74. Rodríguez-Garavito CA. 2005. Global governance and labor rights: codes of conduct and anti-sweatshop struggles in global apparel factories in Mexico and Guatemala. Polit. Soc. 33:2203–333 [Google Scholar]
  75. Ron J, Ramos H, Rodgers K. 2005. Transnational information politics: NGO human rights reporting, 1986–2000. Int. Stud. Q. 49:3557–88 [Google Scholar]
  76. Ronconi L. 2010. Enforcement and compliance with labor regulations. ILR Rev. 63:4719–36 [Google Scholar]
  77. Ronconi L. 2012. Globalization, domestic institutions, and enforcement of labor law: evidence from Latin America. Ind. Relat. J. Econ. Soc. 51:189–105 [Google Scholar]
  78. Ruggie JG. 2007. Business and human rights: the evolving international agenda. Am. J. Int. Law 101:4819–40 [Google Scholar]
  79. Scherer AG, Palazzo G. 2011. The new political role of business in a globalized world: a review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. J. Manag. Stud. 48:4899–931 [Google Scholar]
  80. Schrank A. 2009. Professionalization and probity in a patrimonial state: labor inspectors in the Dominican Republic. Latin Am. Polit. Soc. 51:291–115 [Google Scholar]
  81. Schrank A. 2013. From disguised protectionism to rewarding regulation: the impact of trade-related labor standards in the Dominican Republic. Regul. Gov. 7:299–320 [Google Scholar]
  82. Seidman GW. 2007. Beyond the Boycott: Labor Rights, Human Rights, and Transnational Activism New York: Russell Sage Found.
  83. Stallings B. 2010. Globalization and labor in four developing regions: an institutional approach. Stud. Comp. Int. Dev. 45:2127–50 [Google Scholar]
  84. Stiglitz JE. 2003. Globalization and Its Discontents New York: W.W. Norton, 1st ed..
  85. Toffel MW, Short JL, Ouellet M. 2015. Codes in context: how states, markets, and civil society shape adherence to global labor standards. Regul. Gov. In press
  86. Vadlamannati KC. 2015. Rewards of (dis)integration: economic, social, and political globalization and freedom of association and collective bargaining rights of workers in developing countries. ILR Rev. 68:13–27 [Google Scholar]
  87. Vogel D. 2007. The Market for Virtue: The Potential and Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility Washington, DC: Brookings Inst. Press
  88. Vogel D. 2008. Private global business regulation. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 11:1261–82 [Google Scholar]
  89. Wood RM. 2014. Aiding labor: foreign aid and the promotion of labor rights in LDCs. J. Hum. Rights 13:2186–204 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-120814-121322
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-120814-121322
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error