Research on behavioral ethics is flourishing, providing new insight into the cognitive, situational, and social factors that influence ethical decisions. Although many common approaches to dealing with legal ethics assume that unethical behavior is a result of conscious decision making driven by economic self-interest, the psychology of behavioral ethics makes clear that ethical decision making is far more complex than bad actors making conscious decisions to act unethically for their own economic advancement. This article reviews recent work on behavioral ethics, bringing together research findings about cognitive and social factors that influence ethical decision making and focusing on those with particular application to the legal context. The ethical issues faced by lawyers provide a rich context within which to apply the findings of existing research and to conduct new research that explores both the unexceptional and unique structures and pressures on ethical decision making in legal practice.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


Literature Cited

  1. Aquino K, Freeman D, Reed A, Lim VK, Felps W. 2009. Testing a social-cognitive model of moral behavior: the interactive influence of situations and moral identity centrality. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 97:123–41 [Google Scholar]
  2. Aquino K, Reed A. 2002. The self-importance of moral identity. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 83:1423–40 [Google Scholar]
  3. Ashforth BE, Anand V. 2003. The normalization of corruption in organizations. Res. Organ. Behav. 25:1–52 [Google Scholar]
  4. Ashkanasy NM, Windsor CA, Treviño LK. 2006. Bad apples in bad barrels revisited: cognitive moral development, just world beliefs, rewards, and ethical decision making. Bus. Ethics. Q. 16:449–73 [Google Scholar]
  5. Ashton MC, Lee K. 2008. The HEXACO model of personality structure and the importance of the H factor. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Compass 2:1952–62 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bandura A. 1999. Moral disengagement in the perpetuation of inhumanities. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 3:193–209 [Google Scholar]
  7. Barkan R, Ayal S, Gino F, Ariely D. 2012. The pot calling the kettle black: distancing response to ethical dissonance. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 141:757–73 [Google Scholar]
  8. Barnes CM, Schaubroeck J, Huth M, Ghumman S. 2011. Lack of sleep and unethical conduct. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 115:169–80 [Google Scholar]
  9. Barsky A. 2008. Understanding the ethical cost of organizational goal setting: a review and theory development. J. Bus. Ethics 81:63–81 [Google Scholar]
  10. Batson CD, Thompson ER, Seuferling G, Whitney H, Strongman JA. 1999. Moral hypocrisy: appearing moral to oneself without being so. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 77:525–37 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bersoff DM. 1999. Why good people sometimes do bad things: motivated reasoning and unethical behavior. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 25:28–39 [Google Scholar]
  12. Bohns VK, Roghanizad MM, Xu AZ. 2014. Underestimating our influence over others' unethical behavior and decisions. Person. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 40:348–62 [Google Scholar]
  13. Bryan CJ, Adams GS, Monin B. 2013. When cheating would make you a cheater: Implicating the self prevents unethical behavior. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 142:1001–5 [Google Scholar]
  14. Cain DM, Loewenstein G, Moore DA. 2005. The dirt on coming clean: perverse effects of disclosing conflicts of interest. Legal Stud. 34:1–25 [Google Scholar]
  15. Cain DM, Loewenstein G, Moore DA. 2011. When sunlight fails to disinfect: understanding the perverse effects of disclosing conflicts of interest. J. Consum. Res. 37:836–57 [Google Scholar]
  16. Cameron JS, Miller DT. 2009. Ethical standards in gain versus loss frames. Psychological Perspectives on Ethical Behavior and Decision Making D De Cremer 91–106 Charlotte, NC: Inf. Age [Google Scholar]
  17. Cascio J, Plant EA. 2015. Prospective moral licensing: Does anticipating doing good later allow you to be bad now?. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 56:110–16 [Google Scholar]
  18. Christian MS, Ellis APJ. 2011. Examining the effects of sleep deprivation on workplace deviance: a self-regulatory perspective. Acad. Manag. J. 54:913–34 [Google Scholar]
  19. Coffman LC. 2011. Intermediation reduces punishment (and reward). Am. Econ. J. Microecon. 3:77–106 [Google Scholar]
  20. Cohen TR. 2010. Moral emotions and unethical bargaining: the differential effects of empathy and perspective taking in deterring deceitful negotiation. J. Bus. Ethics 94:569–79 [Google Scholar]
  21. Cohen TR, Morse L. 2014. Moral character: what it is and what it does. Res. Organ. Behav. 34:43–61 [Google Scholar]
  22. Cohen TR, Wolf ST, Panter AT, Insko CA. 2011. Introducing the GASP scale: a new measure of guilt and shame proneness. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 100:947–66 [Google Scholar]
  23. Cojuharenco I, Shteynberg G, Gelfand M, Schminke M. 2012. Self-construal and unethical behavior. J. Bus. Ethics 109:447–61 [Google Scholar]
  24. Conway P, Peetz J. 2012. When does feeling moral actually make you a better person? Conceptual abstraction moderates whether past moral deeds motivate consistency or compensatory behavior. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 38:907–19 [Google Scholar]
  25. Cushman F, Young L, Hauser M. 2006. The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgment: testing three principles of harm. Psychol. Sci. 17:1082–89 [Google Scholar]
  26. Daicoff S. 1996. (Oxymoron?) Ethical decision making by attorneys: an empirical study. Fla. Law Rev. 48:197–262 [Google Scholar]
  27. Dana J, Weber RA, Kuang JX. 2007. Exploiting moral wiggle room: experiments demonstrating an illusory preference for fairness. Econ. Theory 33:67–80 [Google Scholar]
  28. Darley JM, Batson CD. 1973. “From Jerusalem to Jericho”: a study of situational and dispositional variables in helping behavior. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 27:100–8 [Google Scholar]
  29. Depoorter B, Tontrup SW. 2012. How law frames moral intuitions: the expressive effect of specific performance. Ariz. Law Rev. 54:673–717 [Google Scholar]
  30. Detert JR, Treviño LK, Sweitzer VL. 2008. Moral disengagement in ethical decision making: a study of antecedents and outcomes. J. Appl. Psychol. 93:374–91 [Google Scholar]
  31. Deutsch M. 1975. Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice?. J. Soc. Issues 31:137–49 [Google Scholar]
  32. Diekmann KA, Samuels SM, Ross L, Bazerman MH. 1997. Self-interest and fairness in problems of resource allocation: allocators versus recipients. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 72:1061–74 [Google Scholar]
  33. Diekmann KA, Tenbrunsel AE, Galinsky AD. 2003. From self-prediction to self-defeat: behavioral forecasting, self-fulfilling prophecies, and the effect of competitive expectations. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 85:672–83 [Google Scholar]
  34. Economides K, O'Leary M. 2007. The moral of the story: toward an understanding of ethics in organisations and legal practice. Legal Ethics 10:5–25 [Google Scholar]
  35. Eldred TW. 2012. Prescriptions for ethical blindness: improving advocacy for indigent defendants in criminal cases. Rutgers Law Rev. 65:333–94 [Google Scholar]
  36. Epley N, Caruso EM. 2004. Egocentric ethics. Soc. Justice Res. 17:171–87 [Google Scholar]
  37. Epley N, Dunning D. 2000. Feeling “holier than thou”: Are self-serving assessments produced by errors in self- or social prediction?. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 79:861–75 [Google Scholar]
  38. Fisman R, Galinsky A. 2012. Can you train business school students to be ethical?. Slate Sept. 4. http://www.slate.com/articles/business/the_dismal_science/2012/09/business_school_and_ethics_can_we_train_mbas_to_do_the_right_thing_.html
  39. Flynn FJ, Wiltermuth SS. 2010. Who's with me? False consensus, brokerage, and ethical decisions in organizations. Acad. Manag. J. 53:1074–89 [Google Scholar]
  40. Garcia SM, Darley Robinson JM. 2001. Morally questionable tactics: negotiations between district attorneys and public defenders. 27731–43
  41. Gino F, Ariely D. 2012. The dark side of creativity: Original thinkers can be more dishonest. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 102:3445–59 [Google Scholar]
  42. Gino F, Ayal S, Ariely D. 2009a. Contagion and differentiation in unethical behavior: the effect of one bad apple on the barrel. Psychol. Sci. 20:393–98 [Google Scholar]
  43. Gino F, Ayal S, Ariely D. 2013. Self-serving altruism? The lure of unethical actions that benefit others. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 93:285–92 [Google Scholar]
  44. Gino F, Bazerman MH. 2009. When misconduct goes unnoticed: the acceptability of gradual erosion in others' unethical behavior. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 45:708–19 [Google Scholar]
  45. Gino F, Galinsky A. 2012. Vicarious dishonesty: when psychological closeness creates distance from one's moral compass. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 119:15–26 [Google Scholar]
  46. Gino F, Gu J, Zhong CB. 2009b. Contagion or restitution? When bad apples can motivate ethical behavior. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 45:1299–302 [Google Scholar]
  47. Gino F, Moore DA, Bazerman MH. 2009c. See no evil: why we fail to notice unethical behavior. Social Decision Making: Social Dilemmas, Social Values, and Ethical Judgments RM Kramer, AE Tenbrunsel, MH Bazerman 241–63 New York: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  48. Gino F, Moore D, Bazerman MH. 2012. No harm, no foul: explaining the outcome bias in ethical judgments Work. Pap., Harvard Bus. School, Cambridge, MA
  49. Gino F, Pierce L. 2009a. Dishonesty in the name of equity. Psychol. Sci. 20:1153–60 [Google Scholar]
  50. Gino F, Pierce L. 2009b. The abundance effect: unethical behavior in the presence of wealth. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 109:142–55 [Google Scholar]
  51. Gino F, Pierce L. 2010a. Lying to level the playing field: why people may dishonestly help or hurt others to create equity. J. Bus. Ethics 95:89–103 [Google Scholar]
  52. Gino F, Pierce L. 2010b. Robin Hood under the hood: wealth-based discrimination in illicit customer help. Organ. Sci. 21:1176–94 [Google Scholar]
  53. Gino F, Schweitzer M, Mead N, Ariely D. 2011. Unable to resist temptation: how self-control depletion promotes unethical behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 115:191–203 [Google Scholar]
  54. Gino F, Shu LL, Bazerman MH. 2010. Nameless + harmless = blameless: when seemingly irrelevant factors influence judgment of (un)ethical behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 111:102–15 [Google Scholar]
  55. Gioia DA. 1992. Pinto fires and personal ethics: a script analysis of missed opportunities. J. Bus. Ethics 11:379–89 [Google Scholar]
  56. Gollwitzer PM, Sheeran P. 2006. Implementation intentions and goal achievement: a meta-analysis of effects of processes. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 38:69–119 [Google Scholar]
  57. Goodwin GP, Darley JM. 2008. The psychology of meta-ethics: exploring objectivism. Cognition 106:1339–66 [Google Scholar]
  58. Gordon RW. 1998. The ethical worlds of large-firm litigators: preliminary observations. Fordham Law Rev. 67:709–38 [Google Scholar]
  59. Gunia BC, Barnes CM, Sah S. 2014. The morality of larks and owls: Unethical behavior depends on chronotype as well as time of day. Psychol. Sci. 25:2272–74 [Google Scholar]
  60. Gunia BC, Wang L, Huang L, Wang JW, Murnighan JK. 2012. Contemplation and conversation: subtle influences on moral decision making. Acad. Manag. J. 55:13–33 [Google Scholar]
  61. Haggar MS, Wood C, Stiff C, Chatzisarantis NLD. 2010. Ego depletion and the strength model of self-control: a meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 136:495–525 [Google Scholar]
  62. Haidt J. 2001. The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychol. Rev. 108:814–34 [Google Scholar]
  63. Haisley EC, Weber RA. 2010. Self-serving interpretations of ambiguity in other regarding behavior. Games Econ. Behav. 68:614–25 [Google Scholar]
  64. Halbesleben JRB, Buckley MR, Sauer ND. 2004. The role of pluralistic ignorance in perceptions of unethical behavior: an investigation of attorneys' and students' perceptions of ethical behavior. Ethics Behav. 14:17–30 [Google Scholar]
  65. Hall K, Holmes V. 2009. The power of rationalisation to influence lawyers' decisions to act unethically. Legal Ethics 11:137–53 [Google Scholar]
  66. Hall OF, Mobbs D, Evans D, Hiscox L, Navrady L, Dalgleish T. 2012. What we say and what we do: the relationship between real and hypothetical moral choices. Cognition 123:434–41 [Google Scholar]
  67. Hamman JR, Loewenstein G, Weber RA. 2010. Self-interest through delegation: an additional rationale for the principle-agent relationship. Am. Econ. Rev. 100:1826–46 [Google Scholar]
  68. Hannah ST, Avolio BJ, May DR. 2011. Moral maturation and moral conation: a capacity approach to explaining moral thought and action. Acad. Manag. Rev. 36:663–85 [Google Scholar]
  69. Hayibor S, Wasieleski DM. 2009. Effects of the use of the availability heuristic on ethical decision-making in organizations. J. Bus. Ethics 84:151–65 [Google Scholar]
  70. Hershfield H, Cohen TR, Thompson L. 2012. Short horizons and tempting situations: Lack of continuity to our future selves leads to unethical decision making and behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 117:298–310 [Google Scholar]
  71. Hilbig BE, Hessler CM. 2013. What lies beneath: how the distance between truth and lie drives dishonesty. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 49:263–66 [Google Scholar]
  72. Hinshaw A, Alberts JK. 2011. Doing the right thing: an empirical study of attorney negotiation ethics. Harvard Negot. Law Rev. 16:95–163 [Google Scholar]
  73. Hsee CK, Yang Y, Zheng X, Wang H. 2015. Lay rationalism: Individual differences in using reasons versus feelings to guide decisions. J. Mark. Res. 52:1134–46 [Google Scholar]
  74. Jap S, Robertson DC, Hamilton R. 2011. The dark side of rapport: agent misbehavior face-to-face and online. Manag. Sci. 57:1610–22 [Google Scholar]
  75. John LK, Loewenstein G, Rick SI. 2014. Cheating more for less: Upward social comparisons motivate the poorly compensated to cheat. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 123:101–9 [Google Scholar]
  76. Jordan J, Mullen E, Murnighan JK. 2011. Striving for the moral self: the effects of recalling past moral actions on future moral behavior. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 37:701–13 [Google Scholar]
  77. Kahneman D, Lovallo D. 1993. Timid choices and bold forecasts: a cognitive perspective on risk taking. Manag. Sci. 39:17–31 [Google Scholar]
  78. Kern M, Chugh D. 2009. Bounded ethicality: the perils of loss framing. Psychol. Sci. 20:378–84 [Google Scholar]
  79. Kilgore WDS, Kilgore DB, Day LM, Li C, Kamimori GH, Balkin TJ. 2007. The effects of 53 hours of sleep deprivation on moral judgment. Sleep 30:345–52 [Google Scholar]
  80. Kim SH. 2005. The banality of fraud: re-situating the inside counsel as gatekeeper. Fordham Law Rev. 74:983–1077 [Google Scholar]
  81. Kirkland K. 2008. Ethical infrastructures and de facto ethical norms at work in large US law firms: the role of ethics counsel. Legal Ethics 11:181–200 [Google Scholar]
  82. Kivetz Y, Tyler TR. 2007. Tomorrow I'll be me: the effect of time perspective on the activation of idealistic versus pragmatic selves. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 102:193–211 [Google Scholar]
  83. Korobkin R. 2006. Psychological impediments to mediation success: theory and practice. Ohio St. J. Disput. Resolut. 21:281–327 [Google Scholar]
  84. Kouchaki M. 2011. Vicarious moral licensing: the influence of others' past moral actions on moral behavior. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 101:702–15 [Google Scholar]
  85. Kouchaki M. 2013. Professionalism and moral behavior: Does a professional self-conception make one more unethical?. Work. Pap. No. 4, Edmond J. Safra Res. Lab., Harvard Univ. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2243811
  86. Kouchaki M, Smith IH. 2014. The morning morality effect: the influence of time of day on unethical behavior. Psychol. Sci. 25:95–102 [Google Scholar]
  87. Kouchaki M, Smith-Crowe K, Brief AP, Sousa C. 2013. Seeing green: Mere exposure to money triggers a business decision frame and unethical outcomes. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 121:53–61 [Google Scholar]
  88. Lahan SM. 2009. Expanding the moral circle: inclusion and exclusion mindsets and the circle of moral regard. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 45:250–53 [Google Scholar]
  89. Leavitt K, Reynolds SJ, Barnes CM, Schilpzand P, Hannah ST. 2012. Different hats, different obligations: plural occupational identities and situated moral judgments. Acad. Manag. J. 55:1316–33 [Google Scholar]
  90. Levin LC. 2009. Bad apples, bad lawyers or bad decisionmaking: lessons from psychology and from Lawyers in the Dock. Georgetown J. Legal Ethics 22:1549–94 [Google Scholar]
  91. Lewis A, Bardis A, Flint C, Mason C, Smith N. et al. 2012. Drawing the line somewhere: an experimental study of moral compromise. J. Econ. Psychol. 33:718–25 [Google Scholar]
  92. Loewen PJ, Dawes CT, Mazar N, Johannesson M, Keollinger P, Magnusson P. 2013. The heritability of moral standards for everyday dishonesty. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 93:363–66 [Google Scholar]
  93. Lord CG, Lepper MR, Preston E. 1984. Considering the opposite: a corrective strategy for social judgment. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 47:1231–43 [Google Scholar]
  94. Lundquist T, Ellingsen T, Gribbe E, Johannesson M. 2009. The aversion to lying. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 70:81–92 [Google Scholar]
  95. Malhotra D. 2010. The desire to win: the effects of competitive arousal on motivation and behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 111:139–46 [Google Scholar]
  96. Maruna S, Copes H. 2005. What have we learned from five decades of neutralization research?. Crime Justice 32:221–320 [Google Scholar]
  97. Mazar N, Amir O, Ariely D. 2008. The dishonesty of honest people: a theory of self-concept maintenance. J. Mark. Res. 45:633–44 [Google Scholar]
  98. Mazar N, Ariely D. 2006. Dishonesty in everyday life and its policy implications. J. Public Policy Mark. 25:117–26 [Google Scholar]
  99. Mead N, Baumeister RF, Gino F, Schweitzer M, Ariely D. 2009. Too tired to tell the truth: self-control resource depletion and dishonesty. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 45:594–97 [Google Scholar]
  100. Merritt AC, Effron DA, Fein S, Savitsky KK, Tuller DM, Monin B. 2012. The strategic pursuit of moral credentials. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 48:774–77 [Google Scholar]
  101. Messick DM, Bloom S, Boldizar JP, Samuelson CD. 1985. Why we are fairer than others. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 21:480–500 [Google Scholar]
  102. Messikomer C. 1998. Ambivalence, contradiction, and ambiguity: the everyday ethics of defense litigators. Fordham Law Rev. 67:739–71 [Google Scholar]
  103. Milgram S. 1974. Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View New York: Harper & Row
  104. Miller DT, Effron DA. 2010. Psychological license: when it is needed and how it functions. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 43:115–55 [Google Scholar]
  105. Mills J. 1958. Changes in moral attitudes following temptation. J. Personal. 26:517–31 [Google Scholar]
  106. Monin B, Miller DT. 2001. Moral credentials and the expression of prejudice. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 81:33–43 [Google Scholar]
  107. Monin B, Sawyer PJ, Marquez MJ. 2008. The rejection of moral rebels: resenting those who do the right thing. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 95:76–93 [Google Scholar]
  108. Moore C, Detert JR, Treviño LK, Baker VL, Mayer DM. 2012. Why employees do bad things: moral disengagement and unethical organizational behavior. Person. Psychol. 65:1–48 [Google Scholar]
  109. Moore C, Gino F. 2013. Ethically adrift: how others pull our moral compass from true North, and how we can fix it. Res. Organ. Behav. 33:53–77 [Google Scholar]
  110. Moore C, Tenbrunsel AE. 2014. “Just think about it”? Cognitive complexity and moral choice. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 123:138–49 [Google Scholar]
  111. Moore C, Wakeman SW, Gino F. 2014. Dangerous expectations: breaking rules to resolve cognitive dissonance Work. Pap. 15–012, Harv. Bus. Sch.
  112. Moore DA, Tanlu L, Bazerman MH. 2010. Conflict of interest and the intrusion of bias. Judgm. Decis. Mak. 5:37–53 [Google Scholar]
  113. Moore DA, Tetlock PE, Tanlu L, Bazerman MH. 2006. Conflicts of interest and the case of auditor independence: moral seduction and strategic issue cycling. Acad. Manag. Rev. 31:10–29 [Google Scholar]
  114. Moran S, Schweitzer ME. 2008. When better is worse: envy and the use of deception. Negot. Confl. Manag. Res. 1:3–29 [Google Scholar]
  115. Mullainathan S, Shafir E. 2014. Scarcity: The New Science of Having Less and How It Defines Our Lives New York: Henry Holt & Co.
  116. Nickerson RS. 1998. Confirmation bias: a ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 2:175–220 [Google Scholar]
  117. O'Fallon MJ, Butterfield KD. 2012. The influence of unethical peer behavior on observers' unethical behavior: a social cognitive perspective. J. Bus. Ethics 109:117–31 [Google Scholar]
  118. O'Grady CG. 2015. Behavioral legal ethics, decision making, and the new attorney's unique professional perspective. Nev. Law J. 15:In press [Google Scholar]
  119. Paharia N, Kassam KS, Greene JD, Bazerman MH. 2009. Dirty work, clean hands: the moral psychology of indirect agency. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 109:134–41 [Google Scholar]
  120. Perlman AM. 2007. Unethical obedience by subordinate attorneys: lessons from social psychology. Hofstra Law Rev. 36:451–77 [Google Scholar]
  121. Perlman AM. 2015. A behavioral theory of legal ethics. Indiana Law J. 90:In press [Google Scholar]
  122. Pierce JR, Kilduff GJ, Galinsky AD, Sivanathan N. 2013. From glue to gasoline: how competition turns perspective takers unethical. Psychol. Sci. 24:1986–94 [Google Scholar]
  123. Pierce L, Snyder J. 2008. Ethical spillovers in firms: evidence from vehicle emissions testing. Manag. Sci. 54:1891–903 [Google Scholar]
  124. Pittarello A, Leib M, Gordon-Hecker T, Shalvi S. 2015. Justifications shape ethical blind spots. Psychol. Sci. 26:794–804 [Google Scholar]
  125. Rai TS, Fiske AP. 2011. Moral psychology is relationship regulation: moral motives for unity, hierarchy, equality, and proportionality. Psychol. Rev. 118:57–75 [Google Scholar]
  126. Rapoport N. 2014. “Nudging” better lawyer behavior: using default rules and incentives to change behavior in law firms. St. Mary's J. Legal Ethics Malpract. 4:42–110 [Google Scholar]
  127. Regan M. 2006. Eat What You Kill: The Fall of a Wall Street Lawyer. Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press
  128. Reinders Folmer CP, De Cremer D. 2012. Bad for me or bad for us? Interpersonal orientations and the impact of losses on unethical behavior. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 38:760–71 [Google Scholar]
  129. Reynolds SJ. 2008. Moral attentiveness: Who pays attention to the moral aspects of life?. J. Appl. Psychol. 93:1027–41 [Google Scholar]
  130. Reynolds SJ, Ceranic TL. 2007. The effects of moral judgment and moral identity on moral behavior: an empirical examination of the moral individual. J. Appl. Psychol. 92:1610–24 [Google Scholar]
  131. Reynolds SJ, Dang CT, Yam KC, Leavitt K. 2014. The role of moral knowledge in everyday immorality: What does it matter if I know what is right?. Org. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 123:124–37 [Google Scholar]
  132. Robbennolt JK, Sternlight JR. 2013. Behavioral legal ethics. Ariz. State Law J. 45:1107–82 [Google Scholar]
  133. Robertson CT. 2011. Biased advice. Emory Law J. 60:653–703 [Google Scholar]
  134. Ross L, Ward A. 1996. Naïve realism in everyday life: implications for social conflict and misunderstanding. Values and Knowledge ES Reed, E Turiel, T Brown 103–36 Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Assoc. [Google Scholar]
  135. Ruedy NE, Moore C, Gino F, Schweitzer ME. 2013. The cheater's high: the unexpected affective benefits of unethical behavior. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 105:531–48 [Google Scholar]
  136. Ruedy NE, Schweitzer ME. 2010. In the moment: the effect of mindfulness on ethical decision making. J. Bus. Ethics 95:73–87 [Google Scholar]
  137. Sachdeva S, Iliev R, Medlin DL. 2009. Sinning saints and saintly sinners: the paradox of moral self-regulation. Psychol. Sci. 20:523–28 [Google Scholar]
  138. Sah S, Loewenstein G. 2014. Nothing to declare: Mandatory and voluntary disclosure leads advisors to avoid conflicts of interest. Psychol. Sci. 25:575–84 [Google Scholar]
  139. Sah S, Loewenstein G, Cain DM. 2013. The burden of disclosure: increased compliance with distrusted advice. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 104:289–304 [Google Scholar]
  140. Schweitzer ME, Dechurch LA, Gibson DE. 2005. Conflict frames and the use of deception: Are competitive negotiators less ethical?. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 35:2123–49 [Google Scholar]
  141. Schweitzer ME, Hsee CK. 2002. Stretching the truth: elastic justification and motivated communication of uncertain information. J. Risk Uncertain. 25:185–201 [Google Scholar]
  142. Schweitzer ME, Ordóñez L, Douma B. 2004. Goal setting as a motivator of unethical behavior. Acad. Manag. J. 47:422–32 [Google Scholar]
  143. Shalvi S, Dana J, Handgraaf MJJ, De Dreu CKW. 2011a. Justified ethicality: observing desired counterfactuals modifies ethical perceptions and behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 115:181–90 [Google Scholar]
  144. Shalvi S, Eldar O, Bereby-Meyer Y. 2012. Honesty requires time (and lack of justifications). Psychol. Sci. 23:1264–70 [Google Scholar]
  145. Shalvi S, Gino F, Barkan R, Ayal S. 2015. Self-serving justifications: doing wrong and feeling moral. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 24:2125–30 [Google Scholar]
  146. Shalvi S, Handgraaf MJJ, De Dreu CKW. 2011b. People avoid situations that enable them to deceive others. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 47:1096–106 [Google Scholar]
  147. Sharma E, Mazar N, Alter AL, Ariely D. 2014. Financial deprivation selectively shifts moral standards and compromises moral decisions. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 123:90–100 [Google Scholar]
  148. Sheldon OJ, Fishbach A. 2015. Anticipating and resisting the temptation to behave unethically. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 41:962–75 [Google Scholar]
  149. Shu LL, Gino F. 2012. Sweeping dishonesty under the rug: how unethical actions lead to forgetting of moral rules. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 102:1164–77 [Google Scholar]
  150. Shu LL, Gino F, Bazerman MH. 2011a. Dishonest deed, clear conscience: when cheating leads to moral disengagement and motivated forgetting. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 37:330–49 [Google Scholar]
  151. Shu LL, Gino F, Bazerman MH. 2011b. Ethical discrepancy: changing our attitudes to resolve moral dissonance. Behavioral Business Ethics: Shaping an Emerging Field D De Cremer, AE Tenbrunsel 221–40 New York: Taylor & Francis [Google Scholar]
  152. Shu LL, Mazar N, Gino F, Ariely D, Bazerman MH. 2012. Signing at the beginning makes ethics salient and decreases dishonest self-reports in comparison to signing at the end. PNAS 109:15197–200 [Google Scholar]
  153. Sonenshein S. 2007. The role of construction, intuition, and justification in responding to ethical issues at work: the sensemaking-intuition model. Acad. Manag. Rev. 32:1022–40 [Google Scholar]
  154. Steinel W, Utz S, Koning L. 2010. The good, the bad and the ugly thing to do when sharing information: Revealing, concealing and lying depend on social motivation, distribution and importance of information. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 113:85–96 [Google Scholar]
  155. Suchman MC. 1998. Working without a net: the sociology of legal ethics in corporate litigation. Fordham Law Rev. 67:837–74 [Google Scholar]
  156. Sutherland EH. 1940. White-collar criminality. Am. Soc. Rev. 5:1–12 [Google Scholar]
  157. Sutherland EH. 1983. White Collar Crime: The Uncut Version. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  158. Sykes GM, Matza D. 1957. Techniques of neutralization: a theory of delinquency. Am. Soc. Rev. 22:664–70 [Google Scholar]
  159. Tenbrunsel AE. 1998. Misrepresentation and expectations of misrepresentation in an ethical dilemma: the role of incentives and temptation. Acad. Manag. J. 41:330–39 [Google Scholar]
  160. Tenbrunsel AE, Diekmann KA, Wade-Benzoni KA, Bazerman MA. 2010. The ethical mirage: a temporal explanation as to why we are not as ethical as we think we are. Res. Organ. Behav. 30:153–73 [Google Scholar]
  161. Tenbrunsel AE, Messick DM. 2004. Ethical fading: the role of self-deception in unethical behavior. Soc. Justice Res. 17:223–36 [Google Scholar]
  162. Tepper R, Tullett AM, Page-Gould E, Inzlicht M. 2015. Errors in moral forecasting: Perceptions of affect shape the gap between moral behaviors and moral forecasts. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 41:887–900 [Google Scholar]
  163. Treviño LK, den Nieuwenboer NA, Kreiner GE, Bishop DG. 2014. Legitimating the legitimate: a grounded theory study of legitimacy work among Ethics and Compliance Officers. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 123:186–205 [Google Scholar]
  164. Treviño LK, Weaver GR, Reynolds S. 2006. Behavioral ethics in organizations: a review. J. Manag. 32:951–90 [Google Scholar]
  165. Tsang J. 2002. Moral rationalization and the integration of situational factors and psychological processes in immoral behavior. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 6:25–50 [Google Scholar]
  166. Tyler TR, Blader SL. 2005. Can businesses effectively regulate employee conduct? The antecedents of rule following in work settings. Acad. Manag. 48:1143–58 [Google Scholar]
  167. Uhlmann EL, Pizarro DA, Tannenbaum D, Ditto PH. 2009. The motivated use of moral principles. Judgm. Decis. Mak. 4:479–91 [Google Scholar]
  168. Valdesolo P, DeSteno D. 2008. The duality of virtue: deconstructing the moral hypocrite. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 44:1334–38 [Google Scholar]
  169. Vincent LC, Emich KJ, Goncalo JA. 2013. Stretching the moral gray zone: positive affect, moral disengagement, and dishonesty. Psychol. Sci. 24:595–99 [Google Scholar]
  170. Vohs KD, Baumeister RF, Schmeichel BJ, Twenge JM, Nelson NM, Tice DM. 2008. Making choices impairs subsequent self-control: a limited-resource account of decision making, self-regulation, and active initiative. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 94:883–98 [Google Scholar]
  171. Weaver GR, Treviño LK. 1999. Compliance and values oriented ethics programs: influences on employees' attitudes and behavior. Bus. Ethics Q. 9:315–35 [Google Scholar]
  172. Welsh DT, Ordóñez LD. 2014a. Conscience without cognition: the effects of subconscious priming on ethical behavior. Acad. Manag. J. 57:79–89 [Google Scholar]
  173. Welsh DT, Ordóñez LD. 2014b. The dark side of consecutive high performance goals: linking goal setting, depletion, and unethical behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 123:79–89 [Google Scholar]
  174. Wendel WB. 2005. Professionalism as interpretation. Northwest. Univ. Law Rev. 99:1167–233 [Google Scholar]
  175. Wilson TD, Gilbert TD. 2003. Affective forecasting. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 35:345–411 [Google Scholar]
  176. Wiltermuth SS. 2011. Cheating more when the spoils are split. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 115:157–68 [Google Scholar]
  177. Zhang T, Gino F, Bazerman MH. 2014. Morality rebooted: exploring simple fixes to our moral bugs. Res. Organ. Behav. 34:63–79 [Google Scholar]
  178. Zhong C. 2011. The ethical dangers of deliberative decision making. Adm. Sci. Q. 56:1–25 [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error