1932

Abstract

This article introduces a scientific exchange over the status of procedural justice theory and its applicability to policing reform. The introduction notes the long history of sociolegal research on procedural justice and its emergence as a source of ideas for criminal justice reforms and police training programs. The article contrasts the positions taken by Nagin & Telep (2017) and Tyler (2017). Nagin & Telep assert that it is premature to apply procedural justice principles without more definitive causal studies in policing. In contrast, Tyler draws on experimental research and other causal studies from different domains to argue that the work is sufficient to proceed with policy reforms.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-121416-011426
2017-10-13
2024-06-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/lawsocsci/13/1/annurev-lawsocsci-121416-011426.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-121416-011426&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Bell M. 2017. Police reform and the dismantling of legal estrangement. Yale Law J. 126:2054–150 [Google Scholar]
  2. Landsman S. 2012. Pro se litigation. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 8:231–53 [Google Scholar]
  3. MacCoun R. 2005. Voice, control, and belonging: the double-edged sword of procedural fairness. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 1:171–201 [Google Scholar]
  4. Meares T. 2014. The law and social science of stop and frisk. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 10:335–52 [Google Scholar]
  5. Menkel-Meadow C. 2007. Restorative justice: What is it and how does it work. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 3:161–87 [Google Scholar]
  6. Miller DT. 2001. Disrespect and the experience of injustice. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 52:527–53 [Google Scholar]
  7. Morrill C, Rudes DS. 2010. Conflict resolution in organizations. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 6:627–51 [Google Scholar]
  8. Nagin DS, Telep CW. 2017. Procedural justice and legal compliance. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 13:5–28 [Google Scholar]
  9. National Research Council. 2017. Proactive policing: effects on crime, communities, and civil liberties in the United States DBSSE-CLAJ-14-02, Div. Behav. Soc. Sci. Educ., Comm. Law Justice [Google Scholar]
  10. President's Task Force on 21st Century Policing. 2015. Final Report of the President's Task Force on 21st Century Policing Washington, DC: Off. Community Oriented Polic. Serv. [Google Scholar]
  11. Seron C, Coutin S, Meeusen PW. 2013. Is there a canon of law and society. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 9:287–306 [Google Scholar]
  12. Skogan WG, Van Craen M, Hennessy C. 2015. Training police for procedural justice. J. Exp. Criminol. 11:319–34 [Google Scholar]
  13. Thibaut J, Walker L. 1975. Procedural Justice Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum [Google Scholar]
  14. Tyler T. 2017. Procedural justice and policing: a rush to judgment?. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 13:29–53 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-121416-011426
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error