1932

Abstract

Activated processes in materials are important for many of the properties that make them function. Batteries and catalysts are examples for which understanding how the component materials function on a timescale of milliseconds to seconds is critical to making improvements in a rational way. Modeling materials over these long timescales, relative to the timescale of atomic vibrations, is one of the grand challenges of the field. Transition state theory is central to bridging this timescale gap, and in the materials community, the harmonic approximation and the determination of saddle points to quantify reaction rates are ubiquitous. In this review, single- and double-ended methods for saddle point finding are discussed, as well as how finding saddle points can be used in the adaptive kinetic Monte Carlo method to model materials properties on the timescale of activated processes. Applications of surface diffusion and chemistry, phase boundary migration, and solid-solid phase transitions are presented.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-matsci-071312-121616
2017-07-03
2024-06-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/matsci/47/1/annurev-matsci-071312-121616.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-matsci-071312-121616&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Jónsson H, Mills G, Jacobsen KW. 1.  1998. Nudged elastic band method for finding minimum energy paths of transitions. Classical and Quantum Dynamics in Condensed Phase Simulations ed. BJ Berne, G Ciccotti, DF Coker 385–404 Singapore: World Sci. [Google Scholar]
  2. Henkelman G, Jónsson H. 2.  2000. Improved tangent estimate in the nudged elastic band method for finding minimum energy paths and saddle points. J. Chem. Phys. 113:9978–85 [Google Scholar]
  3. Henkelman G, Uberuaga BP, Jónsson H. 3.  2000. A climbing image nudged elastic band method for finding saddle points and minimum energy paths. J. Chem. Phys. 113:9901–4 [Google Scholar]
  4. Weinan E, Ren W, Vanden-Eijnden E. 4.  2002. String method for the study of rare events. Phys. Rev. B 66:052301 [Google Scholar]
  5. Weinan E, Ren W, Vanden-Eijnden E. 5.  2005. Finite temperature string method for the study of rare events. J. Phys. Chem. B 109:6688–93 [Google Scholar]
  6. Dellago C, Bolhuis P, Csajka FS, Chandler D. 6.  1998. Transition path sampling and the calculation of rate constants. J. Chem. Phys. 108:1964–77 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bolhuis PG, Dellago C, Chandler D. 7.  2000. Reaction coordinates of biomolecular isomerization. PNAS 97:5877–82 [Google Scholar]
  8. Faradjian AK, Elber R. 8.  2004. Computing time scales from reaction coordinates by milestoning. J. Chem. Phys. 120:10880–89 [Google Scholar]
  9. Allen RJ, Frenkel D, ten Wolde PR. 9.  2006. Simulating rare events in equilibrium or nonequilibrium stochastic systems. J. Chem. Phys. 124:024102 [Google Scholar]
  10. Allen RJ, Frenkel D, ten Wolde PR. 10.  2006. Forward flux sampling-type schemes for simulating rare events: efficiency analysis. J. Chem. Phys. 124:194111 [Google Scholar]
  11. van Erp TS, Moroni D, Bolhuis PG. 11.  2003. A novel path sampling method for the calculation of rate constants. J. Chem. Phys. 118:7762 [Google Scholar]
  12. Wales DJ.12.  2002. Discrete path sampling. Mol. Phys. 100:3285–305 [Google Scholar]
  13. Wales DJ.13.  2004. Some further applications of discrete path sampling to cluster isomerization. Mol. Phys. 102:891–908 [Google Scholar]
  14. Wales DJ.14.  2006. Energy landscapes: calculating pathways and rates. Int. Rev. Phys. Chem. 25:237–82 [Google Scholar]
  15. Wigner E.15.  1938. The transition state method. Trans. Faraday Soc. 34:29–41 [Google Scholar]
  16. Eyring H.16.  1938. The theory of absolute reaction rates. Trans. Faraday Soc. 34:41–48 [Google Scholar]
  17. Keck JC.17.  1967. Variational theory of reaction rates. Adv. Chem. Phys. 13:85 [Google Scholar]
  18. Chandler D.18.  1978. Statistical mechanics of isomerization dynamics in liquids and the transition state approximation. J. Chem. Phys. 68:2959–70 [Google Scholar]
  19. Voter AF, Doll D. 19.  1985. Dynamical corrections to transition state theory for multistate systems: surface self-diffusion in the rare-event regime. J. Chem. Phys. 82:80–92 [Google Scholar]
  20. Vineyard GH.20.  1957. Frequency factors and isotope effects in solid state rate processes. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 3:121–27 [Google Scholar]
  21. Sheppard D, Terrell R, Henkelman G. 21.  2008. Optimization methods for finding minimum energy paths. J. Phys. Chem. 128:134106 [Google Scholar]
  22. Henkelman G, Jónsson H. 22.  1999. A dimer method for finding saddle points on high dimensional potential surfaces using only first derivatives. J. Chem. Phys. 111:7010–22 [Google Scholar]
  23. Mills G, Jónsson H, Schenter GK. 23.  1995. Reversible work transition state theory: application to dissociative adsorption of hydrogen. Surf. Sci. 324:305–37 [Google Scholar]
  24. Smidstrup S, Pedersen A, Stokbro K, Jónsson H. 24.  2014. Improved initial guess for minimum energy path calculations. J. Chem. Phys. 140:214106 [Google Scholar]
  25. Maragakis P, Andreev SA, Brumer Y, Reichman DR, Kaxiras E. 25.  2002. Adaptive nudged elastic band approach for transition state calculation. J. Chem. Phys. 117:4651–58 [Google Scholar]
  26. Trygubenko SA, Wales DJ. 26.  2004. A doubly nudged elastic band method for finding transition states. J. Chem. Phys. 120:2082–94 [Google Scholar]
  27. Munro LJ, Wales DJ. 27.  1999. Defect migration in crystalline silicon. Phys. Rev. B 59:3969 [Google Scholar]
  28. Chill ST, Stevenson J, Ruhle V, Shang C, Xiao P. 28.  et al. 2014. Benchmarks for characterization of minima, transition states and pathways in atomic systems. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 10:5476–82 [Google Scholar]
  29. Peters B, Heyden A, Bell AT, Chakraborty A. 29.  2004. A growing string method for determining transition states: comparison to the nudged elastic band and string methods. J. Chem. Phys. 120:7877–86 [Google Scholar]
  30. Henkelman G, Jóhannesson G, Jónsson H. 30.  2000. Methods for finding saddle points and minimum energy paths. Progress on Theoretical Chemistry and Physics ed. S Schwartz 269–99 New York: Kluwer Acad. [Google Scholar]
  31. Feibelman PJ.31.  1990. Diffusion path for an Al adatom on Al(001). Phys. Rev. Lett. 65:729–32 [Google Scholar]
  32. Trushin OS, Salo P, Ala-Nissila T. 32.  2000. Energetics and many-particle mechanisms of two-dimensional cluster diffusion on Cu(100) surfaces. Phys. Rev. B 62:1611–14 [Google Scholar]
  33. Henkelman G, Jónsson H. 33.  2003. Multiple time scale simulations of metal crystal growth reveal importance of multi-atom surface processes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90:116101 [Google Scholar]
  34. Uberuaga BP, Smith R, Cleave AR, Montalenti F, Henkelman G. 34.  et al. 2004. Structure and mobility of defects formed from collision cascades in MgO. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92:115505 [Google Scholar]
  35. Xu L, Campbell CT, Jónsson H, Henkelman G. 35.  2007. Kinetic Monte Carlo simulations of Pd deposition and island growth on MgO(100). Surf. Sci. 601:3133–42 [Google Scholar]
  36. Uberuaga BP, Hoagland RG, Voter AF, Valone SM. 36.  2007. Direct transformation of vacancy voids to stacking fault tetrahedra. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99:135501 [Google Scholar]
  37. Xu L, Henkelman G. 37.  2008. Adaptive kinetic Monte Carlo for first-principles accelerated dynamics. J. Chem. Phys. 129:114104 [Google Scholar]
  38. Xu L, Henkelman G. 38.  2008. Calculations of Ca adsorption on MgO(100) surface: determination of the binding sites and growth mode. Phys. Rev. B 77:205404 [Google Scholar]
  39. Olsen RA, Kroes GJ, Henkelman G, Arnaldsson A, Jónsson H. 39.  2004. Comparison of methods for finding saddle points without knowledge of the final states. J. Chem. Phys. 121:9776–92 [Google Scholar]
  40. Heyden A, Bell AT, Keil FJ. 40.  2005. Efficient methods for finding transition states in chemical reactions: comparison of improved dimer method and partitioned rational function optimization method. J. Chem. Phys. 123:224101 [Google Scholar]
  41. Kästner J, Sherwood P. 41.  2008. Superlinearly converging dimer method for transition state search. J. Chem. Phys. 128:014106 [Google Scholar]
  42. Malek R, Mousseau N. 42.  2000. Dynamics of Lennard-Jones clusters: a characterization of the activation-relaxation technique. Phys. Rev. E 62:7723–28 [Google Scholar]
  43. Xiao P, Wu Q, Henkelman G. 43.  2014. Basin constrained κ-dimer method for saddle point finding. J. Chem. Phys. 141:164111 [Google Scholar]
  44. Pedersen A, Hafstein SF, Jónsson H. 44.  2011. Efficient sampling of saddle points with the minimum-mode following method. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 33:633–52 [Google Scholar]
  45. Duncan J, Wu Q, Promislow K, Henkelman G. 45.  2014. Biased gradient squared descent saddle point finding method. J. Chem. Phys. 140:194102 [Google Scholar]
  46. Sørensen MR, Voter AF. 46.  2000. Temperature-accelerated dynamics for simulation of infrequent events. J. Chem. Phys. 112:9599–606 [Google Scholar]
  47. Chill ST, Henkelman G. 47.  2014. Molecular dynamics saddle search adaptive kinetic Monte Carlo. J. Chem. Phys. 140:214110 [Google Scholar]
  48. Voter AF, Montalenti F, Germann TC. 48.  2002. Extending the time scale in atomistic simulation of materials. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 32:321–46 [Google Scholar]
  49. Voter AF.49.  1998. Parallel replica method for dynamics of infrequent events. Phys. Rev. B 57:R13985–88 [Google Scholar]
  50. Voter AF.50.  1997. Hyperdynamics: accelerated molecular dynamics of infrequent events. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78:3908–11 [Google Scholar]
  51. Bortz AB, Kalos MH, Lebowitz JL. 51.  1975. A new algorithm for Monte Carlo simulation of Ising spin systems. J. Comput. Phys. 17:10 [Google Scholar]
  52. Gillespie DT.52.  1976. A general method for numerically simulating the stochastic time evolution of coupled chemical reactions. J. Comp. Phys. 22:403–34 [Google Scholar]
  53. Voter AF.53.  1986. Classically exact overlayer dynamics: diffusion of rhodium clusters on Rh(100). Phys. Rev. B 34:6819–29 [Google Scholar]
  54. Voter AF.54.  2007. Introduction to the kinetic Monte Carlo method. Radiation Effects in Solids NATO Science Series II: Mathematics, Physics and Chemistry, ed. KE Sickafus, EA Kotomin, BP Uberuaga 1–23 Dordrecht, Neth: Springer [Google Scholar]
  55. Henkelman G, Jónsson H. 55.  2001. Long time scale kinetic Monte Carlo simulations without lattice approximation and predefined event table. J. Chem. Phys. 115:9657–66 [Google Scholar]
  56. Chill ST, Welborn M, Terrell R, Zhang L, Berthet JC. 56.  et al. 2014. Eon: software for long time simulations of atomic scale systems. Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 22:055002 [Google Scholar]
  57. Terrell R, Welborn M, Chill ST, Henkelman G. 57.  2012. Database of atomistic reaction mechanisms with application to kinetic Monte Carlo. J. Chem. Phys. 137:014105 [Google Scholar]
  58. El-Mellouhi F, Mousseau N, Lewis LJ. 58.  2008. Kinetic activation-relaxation technique: an off-lattice self-learning kinetic Monte Carlo algorithm. Phys. Rev. B 78:153202 [Google Scholar]
  59. Béland LK, Brommer P, El-Mellouhi F, Joly JF, Mousseau N. 59.  2011. Kinetic activation-relaxation technique. Phys. Rev. E 84:046704 [Google Scholar]
  60. McKay BD.60.  1981. Practical graph isomorphism. Congr. Numer. 30:45–87 [Google Scholar]
  61. Nandipati G, Kara A, Shah SI, Rahman TS. 61.  2012. Off-lattice pattern recognition scheme for kinetic Monte Carlo simulations. J. Comput. Phys. 231:3548–60 [Google Scholar]
  62. Vernon LJ, Kenny SD, Smith R. 62.  2011. Growth mechanisms for TiO2at its rutile (110) surface. Phys. Rev. B 83:075412 [Google Scholar]
  63. Trushin OS, Karim A, Kara A, Rahman TS. 63.  2005. Self-learning kinetic Monte Carlo method: application to Cu(111). Phys. Rev. B 72:115401 [Google Scholar]
  64. Konwar D, Bhute VJ, Chatterjee A. 64.  2011. An off-lattice, self-learning kinetic Monte Carlo method using local environments. J. Chem. Phys. 135:17103 [Google Scholar]
  65. Xu H, Osetsky YN, Stoller RE. 65.  2011. Simulating complex atomistic processes: on-the-fly kinetic Monte Carlo scheme with selective active volumes. Phys. Rev. B 84:142103 [Google Scholar]
  66. Miron RA, Fichthorn KA. 66.  2004. Multiple-time scale accelerated molecular dynamics: addressing the small-barrier problem. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93:128301 [Google Scholar]
  67. Boulougouris GC, Theodorou DN. 67.  2007. Dynamical integration of a Markovian web: a first passage time approach. J. Chem. Phys. 127:084903 [Google Scholar]
  68. Wales DJ.68.  2009. Calculating rate constants and committor probabilities for transition networks by graph transformation. J. Chem. Phys. 130:204111 [Google Scholar]
  69. Chatterjee A, Voter AF. 69.  2010. Accurate acceleration of kinetic Monte Carlo simulations through the modification of rate constants. J. Chem. Phys. 132:194101 [Google Scholar]
  70. Novotny MA.70.  1995. Monte Carlo algorithms with absorbing Markov chains: fast local algorithms for slow dynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 74:1–5 [Google Scholar]
  71. Duncan J, Harjunmaa A, Terrell R, Drautz R, Henkelman G, Rogal J. 71.  2016. Collective atomic displacements during complex phase boundary migration in solid-solid phase transformations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116:035701 [Google Scholar]
  72. Pedersen A, Henkelman G, Schiøtz J, Jónsson H. 72.  2009. Long time scale simulation of a grain boundary in copper. New J. Phys. 11:073034 [Google Scholar]
  73. Pedersen A, Jónsson H. 73.  2009. Simulations of hydrogen diffusion at grain boundaries in aluminum. Acta Met. 57:4036–45 [Google Scholar]
  74. Pedersen A, Karssemeijer LJ, Cuppen HM, Jónsson H. 74.  2015. Long-timescale simulations of H2O admolecule diffusion on ice Ih(0001) surfaces. J. Phys. Chem. C 119:16528 [Google Scholar]
  75. Zhou XW, Wadley HNG, Johnson RA, Larson DJ, Tabat N. 75.  et al. 2001. Atomic scale structure of sputtered metal multilayers. Acta Mater. 49:4005–15 [Google Scholar]
  76. Becker OM, Karplus M. 76.  1997. The topology of multidimensional potential energy surfaces: theory and application to peptide structure and kinetics. J. Chem. Phys. 106:1495–517 [Google Scholar]
  77. Xu L, Mei DH, Henkelman G. 77.  2009. Adaptive kinetic Monte Carlo simulation of methanol decomposition on Cu(100). J. Chem. Phys. 131:244520 [Google Scholar]
  78. Xu L, Henkelman G, Campbell CT, Jónsson H. 78.  2005. Small Pd clusters, up to the tetramer at least, are highly mobile on the MgO(100) surface. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95:146103 [Google Scholar]
  79. Trinkle DR, Hennig RG, Srinivasan SG, Hatch DM, Jones MD. 79.  et al. 2003. New mechanism for the α to ω martensitic transformation in pure titanium. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91:025701 [Google Scholar]
  80. Caspersen KJ, Carter EA. 80.  2005. Finding transition states for crystalline solid-solid phase transformations. PNAS 102:6738–43 [Google Scholar]
  81. Sheppard D, Xiao P, Chemelewski W, Johnson DD, Henkelman G. 81.  2012. A generalized solid-state nudged elastic band method. J. Chem. Phys. 136:074103 [Google Scholar]
  82. Xiao P, Sheppard D, Rogal J, Henkelman G. 82.  2014. Solid-state dimer method for calculating solid-solid phase transitions. J. Chem. Phys. 140:174104 [Google Scholar]
  83. Jónsson H.83.  2011. Simulation of surface processes. PNAS 108:944–49 [Google Scholar]
  84. van Duin ACT, Dasgupta S, Lorant F, Goddard WA. 84.  2001. ReaxFF: a reactive force field for hydrocarbons. J. Phys. Chem. A 105:9396–409 [Google Scholar]
  85. Yu J, Sinnott SB, Phillpot SR. 85.  2007. Charge optimized many-body potential for the SiSiO2 system. Phys. Rev. B 75:085311 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-matsci-071312-121616
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-matsci-071312-121616
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error