1932

Abstract

A hallmark of human language is that we combine lexical building blocks retrieved from memory in endless new ways. This combinatorial aspect of language is referred to as unification. Here we focus on the neurobiological infrastructure for syntactic and semantic unification. Unification is characterized by a high-speed temporal profile including both prediction and integration of retrieved lexical elements. A meta-analysis of numerous neuroimaging studies reveals a clear dorsal/ventral gradient in both left inferior frontal cortex and left posterior temporal cortex, with dorsal foci for syntactic processing and ventral foci for semantic processing. In addition to core areas for unification, further networks need to be recruited to realize language-driven communication to its full extent. One example is the theory of mind network, which allows listeners and readers to infer the intended message (speaker meaning) from the coded meaning of the linguistic utterance. This indicates that sensorimotor simulation cannot handle all of language processing.

[Erratum, Closure]

An erratum has been published for this article:
The Neurobiology of Language Beyond Single Words
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-neuro-071013-013847
2014-07-08
2024-04-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/neuro/37/1/annurev-neuro-071013-013847.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-neuro-071013-013847&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Amodio DM, Frith CD. 2006. Meeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 7:268–77 [Google Scholar]
  2. Amunts K, Catani M. 2015. Cytoarchitectonics, receptor architectonics and network topology of language. See Gazzaniga 2015. In press
  3. Bašnáková J, Weber K, Petersson KM, van Berkum J, Hagoort P. 2013. Beyond the language given: the neural correlates of inferring speaker meaning. Cereb. Cortex. In press
  4. Bohrn IC, Altmann U, Jacobs AM. 2012. Looking at the brains behind figurative language—a quantitative meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on metaphor, idiom, and irony processing. Neuropsychologia 50:2669–83 [Google Scholar]
  5. Caramazza A, Zurif EB. 1976. Dissociation of algorithmic and heuristic processes in language comprehension: evidence from aphasia. Brain Lang. 3:572–82 [Google Scholar]
  6. Carrington SJ, Bailey AJ. 2009. Are there theory of mind regions in the brain? A review of the neuroimaging literature. Hum. Brain Mapp. 30:2313–35 [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen E, West WC, Waters G, Caplan D. 2006. Determinants of bold signal correlates of processing object-extracted relative clauses. Cortex 42:591–604 [Google Scholar]
  8. DeLong KA, Urbach TP, Kutas M. 2005. Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nat. Neurosci. 8:1117–21 [Google Scholar]
  9. Diaz MT, Hogstrom LJ. 2011. The influence of context on hemispheric recruitment during metaphor processing. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 23:3586–97 [Google Scholar]
  10. Ferreira F, Bailey KGD, Ferraro V. 2002. Good-enough representations in language comprehension. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 11:11–15 [Google Scholar]
  11. Friederici AD. 2012. The cortical language circuit: from auditory perception to sentence comprehension. Trends Cogn. Sci. 16:262–68 [Google Scholar]
  12. Friederici AD, Rüschemeyer SA, Hahne A, Fiebach CJ. 2003. The role of left inferior frontal and superior temporal cortex in sentence comprehension: localizing syntactic and semantic processes. Cereb. Cortex 13:170–77 [Google Scholar]
  13. Garrido MI, Kilner JM, Kiebel SJ, Friston KJ. 2007. Evoked brain responses are generated by feedback loops. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104:20961–66 [Google Scholar]
  14. Gazzaniga MS. 2015. The Cognitive Neurosciences Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 5th. In press
  15. Grainger J, Rey A, Dufau S. 2008. Letter perception: from pixels to pandemonium. Trends Cogn. Sci. 12:381–87 [Google Scholar]
  16. Grice P. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  17. Grill-Spector K, Henson R, Martin A. 2006. Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects. Trends Cogn. Sci. 10:14–23 [Google Scholar]
  18. Hagoort P. 2005. On Broca, brain, and binding: a new framework. Trends Cogn. Sci. 9:416–23 [Google Scholar]
  19. Hagoort P. 2013. MUC (memory, unification, control) and beyond. Front. Psychol. 4:416 [Google Scholar]
  20. Hagoort P, Hald L, Bastiaansen M, Petersson KM. 2004. Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension. Science 304:438–41 [Google Scholar]
  21. Hagoort P, Levinson SL. 2015. Neuropragmatics. See Gazzaniga 2015. In press
  22. Hagoort P, van Berkum J. 2007. Beyond the sentence given. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 362:801–11 [Google Scholar]
  23. Hickok G, Poeppel D. 2007. The cortical organization of speech processing. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 8:393–402 [Google Scholar]
  24. Indefrey P. 2011. Neurobiology of syntax. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the Language Sciences PC Hogan 835–38 Cambridge, UK/New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  25. Indefrey P. 2012. Hemodynamic studies of syntactic processing. The Handbook of the Neuropsychology of Language M Faust 209–28 Malden, MA: Blackwell [Google Scholar]
  26. Indefrey P, Hellwig F, Herzog H, Seitz RJ, Hagoort P. 2004. Neural responses to the production and comprehension of syntax in identical utterances. Brain Lang. 89:312–19 [Google Scholar]
  27. Indefrey P, Levelt WJM. 2000. The neural correlates of language production. The New Cognitive Neurosciences MS Gazzaniga 845–65 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  28. Indefrey P, Levelt WJM. 2004. The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition 92:101–44 [Google Scholar]
  29. Jackendoff R. 2002. Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  30. Jackendoff R. 2007. A parallel architecture perspective on language processing. Brain Res. 1146:2–22 [Google Scholar]
  31. Kuperberg GR, McGuire PK, Bullmore ET, Brammer MJ, Rabe-Hesketh S. et al. 2000. Common and distinct neural substrates for pragmatic, semantic, and syntactic processing of spoken sentences: an fMRI study. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 12:321–41 [Google Scholar]
  32. Kuperberg GR, Sitnikova T, Lakshmanan BM. 2008. Neuroanatomical distinctions within the semantic system during sentence comprehension: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. NeuroImage 40:367–88 [Google Scholar]
  33. Kutas M, Federmeier KD, Urbach ThP. 2015. The “negatives” and “positives” of prediction in language. See Gazzaniga 2015. In press
  34. Lau E, Stroud C, Plesch S, Phillips C. 2006. The role of structural prediction in rapid syntactic analysis. Brain Lang. 98:74–88 [Google Scholar]
  35. Levelt WJM. 2013. A History of Psycholinguistics: The Pre-Chomskyan Era Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  36. Levinson SC. 2013. Action formation and ascription. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis J Sidnell, T Stivers 103–30 Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell [Google Scholar]
  37. Mar RA. 2011. The neural bases of social cognition and story comprehension. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 62:103–34 [Google Scholar]
  38. Mar RA, Oatley K. 2008. The function of fiction is the abstraction and simulation of social experience. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 3:173–92 [Google Scholar]
  39. Mars RB, Sallet J, Schüffelgen U, Jbabdi S, Toni I, Rushworth MF. 2012. Connectivity-based subdivisions of the human right “temporoparietal junction area”: evidence for different areas participating in different cortical networks. Cereb. Cortex 22:1894–903 [Google Scholar]
  40. Mason RA, Just MA. 2009. The role of the theory-of-mind cortical network in the comprehension of narratives. Lang. Linguist. Compass 3:157–74 [Google Scholar]
  41. Menenti L, Gierhan SME, Segaert K, Hagoort P. 2011. Shared language: overlap and segregation of the neuronal infrastructure for speaking and listening revealed by functional MRI. Psychol. Sci. 22:1173–82 [Google Scholar]
  42. Metusalem R, Kutas M, Urbach TP, Hare M, McRae K, Elman JL. 2012. Generalized event knowledge activation during online sentence comprehension. J. Mem. Lang. 66:545–67 [Google Scholar]
  43. Meyer AS, Hagoort P. 2013. What does it mean to predict one's own utterances?. Behav. Brain Sci. 36:367–68 [Google Scholar]
  44. Mitchell JP, Macrae CN, Banaji MR. 2006. Dissociable medial prefrontal contributions to judgments of similar and dissimilar others. Neuron 50:655–63 [Google Scholar]
  45. Rizzolatti G, Sinigaglia C. 2010. The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: interpretations and misinterpretations. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 11:264–74 [Google Scholar]
  46. Rodd JM, Longe OA, Randall B, Tyler LK. 2010. The functional organisation of the fronto-temporal language system: evidence from syntactic and semantic ambiguity. Neuropsychologia 48:1324–35 [Google Scholar]
  47. Saxe R, Moran JM, Scholz J, Gabrieli J. 2006. Overlapping and non-overlapping brain regions for theory of mind and self reflection in individual subjects. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 1:229–34 [Google Scholar]
  48. Saxe R. 2010. The right temporo-parietal junction: a specific brain region for thinking about thoughts. Handbook of Theory of Mind A Leslie, T German 1–35 Hove, UK: Psychology Press
  49. Segaert K, Menenti L, Weber K, Petersson KM, Hagoort P. 2012. Shared syntax in language production and language comprehension—an FMRI study. Cereb. Cortex 22:1662–70 [Google Scholar]
  50. Steinhauer K, Drury JE. 2012. On the early left-anterior negativity (ELAN) in syntax studies. Brain Lang. 120:135–62 [Google Scholar]
  51. Szewczyk JM, Schriefers H. 2013. Prediction in language comprehension beyond specific words: an ERP study on sentence comprehension in Polish. J. Mem. Lang. 68:297–314 [Google Scholar]
  52. Talairach J, Tournoux P. 1988. Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain: 3-D Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging Stuttgart: Thieme
  53. Thorpe S, Fize D, Marlot C. 1996. Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature 381:520–22 [Google Scholar]
  54. Tyler LK, Cheung TP, Devereux BJ, Clarke A. 2013. Syntactic computations in the language network: characterizing dynamic network properties using representational similarity analysis. Front. Psychol. 4:271 [Google Scholar]
  55. Tyler LK, Marslen-Wilson WD, Randall B, Wright P, Devereux BJ. et al. 2011. Left inferior frontal cortex and syntax: function, structure and behaviour in patients with left hemisphere damage. Brain 134:415–31 [Google Scholar]
  56. Van Berkum JJ, Brown CM, Zwitserlood P, Kooijman V, Hagoort P. 2005. Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: evidence from ERPs and reading times. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 31:443–67 [Google Scholar]
  57. Van Berkum JJA, van den Brink D, Tesink C, Kos M, Hagoort P. 2008. The neural integration of speaker and message. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 20:580–91 [Google Scholar]
  58. Von Humboldt W. 1829. On the dual. Nouv. Rev. Ger. 1:378–81 [Google Scholar]
  59. Willems RM, Özyürek A, Hagoort P. 2007. When language meets action: the neural integration of gesture and speech. Cereb. Cortex 17:2322–33 [Google Scholar]
  60. Xiang H-D, Fonteijn HM, Norris DG, Hagoort P. 2010. Topographical functional connectivity pattern in the Perisylvian language networks. Cereb. Cortex 20:549–60 [Google Scholar]
  61. Zwitserlood P. 1989. The locus of the effects of sentential-semantic context in spoken-word processing. Cognition 32:25–64 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-neuro-071013-013847
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-neuro-071013-013847
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error