1932

Abstract

The development of advanced noninvasive techniques to image the human brain has enabled the demonstration of structural plasticity during adulthood in response to motor learning. Understanding the basic mechanisms of structural plasticity in the context of motor learning is essential to improve motor rehabilitation in stroke patients. Here, we review and discuss the emerging evidence for motor-learning-related structural plasticity and the implications for stroke rehabilitation. In the clinical context, a few studies have started to assess the effects of rehabilitation on structural measures to understand recovery poststroke and additionally to predict intervention outcomes. Structural imaging will likely have a role in the future in providing measures that inform patient stratification for optimal outcomes.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-neuro-080317-062015
2018-07-08
2024-06-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/neuro/41/1/annurev-neuro-080317-062015.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-neuro-080317-062015&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Allman C, Amadi U, Winkler AM, Wilkins L, Filippini N et al. 2016. Ipsilesional anodal tDCS enhances the functional benefits of rehabilitation in patients after stroke. Sci. Transl. Med. 8:330re1
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bengtsson SL, Nagy Z, Skare S, Forsman L, Forssberg H, Ullen F 2005. Extensive piano practicing has regionally specific effects on white matter development. Nat. Neurosci. 8:1148–50
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bermudez P, Lerch JP, Evans AC, Zatorre RJ 2009. Neuroanatomical correlates of musicianship as revealed by cortical thickness and voxel-based morphometry. Cereb. Cortex 19:1583–96
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bermudez P, Zatorre RJ 2005. Differences in gray matter between musicians and nonmusicians. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1060:395–99
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bezzola L, Merillat S, Gaser C, Jancke L 2011. Training-induced neural plasticity in golf novices. J. Neurosci. 31:12444–48
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Biernaskie J, Corbett D 2001. Enriched rehabilitative training promotes improved forelimb motor function and enhanced dendritic growth after focal ischemic injury. J. Neurosci. 21:5272–80
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Blumenfeld-Katzir T, Pasternak O, Dagan M, Assaf Y 2011. Diffusion MRI of structural brain plasticity induced by a learning and memory task. PLOS ONE 6:e20678
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Boyke J, Driemeyer J, Gaser C, Buchel C, May A 2008. Training-induced brain structure changes in the elderly. J. Neurosci. 28:7031–35
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Cai J, Ji Q, Xin R, Zhang D, Na X, Peng R 2016. Contralesional cortical structural reorganization contributes to motor recovery after sub-cortical stroke: a longitudinal voxel-based morphometry study. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 10:393
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Cannonieri GC, Bonilha L, Fernandes PT, Cendes F, Li LM 2007. Practice and perfect: length of training and structural brain changes in experienced typists. Neuroreport 18:1063–66
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Carmichael ST 2006. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of neural repair after stroke: making waves. Ann. Neurol. 59:735–42
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen JL, Schlaug G 2013. Resting state interhemispheric motor connectivity and white matter integrity correlate with motor impairment in chronic stroke. Front. Neurol. 4:178
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Crofts JJ, Higham DJ, Bosnell R, Jbabdi S, Matthews PM et al. 2011. Network analysis detects changes in the contralesional hemisphere following stroke. Neuroimage 54:161–69
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Dancause N, Barbay S, Frost S, Plautz E, Chen D et al. 2005. Extensive cortical rewiring after brain injury. J. Neurosci. 25:10167–79
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Dayan E, Cohen LG 2011. Neuroplasticity subserving motor skill learning. Neuron 72:443–54
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Della-Maggiore V, Scholz J, Johansen-Berg H, Paus T 2009. The rate of visuomotor adaptation correlates with cerebellar white-matter microstructure. Hum. Brain Mapp. 30:4048–53
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Di Pino G, Pellegrino G, Assenza G, Capone F, Ferreri F et al. 2014. Modulation of brain plasticity in stroke: a novel model for neurorehabilitation. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 10:597–608
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Douaud G, Menke RA, Gass A, Monsch AU, Rao A et al. 2013. Brain microstructure reveals early abnormalities more than two years prior to clinical progression from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease. J. Neurosci. 33:2147–55
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Doyle KP, Simon RP, Stenzel-Poore MP 2008. Mechanisms of ischemic brain damage. Neuropharmacology 55:310–18
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Draganski B, Gaser C, Busch V, Schuierer G, Bogdahn U, May A 2004. Neuroplasticity: changes in grey matter induced by training. Nature 427:311–12
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Draganski B, Moser T, Lummel N, Gänssbauer S, Bogdahn U et al. 2006. Decrease of thalamic gray matter following limb amputation. NeuroImage 31:951–57
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Driemeyer J, Boyke J, Gaser C, Buchel C, May A 2008. Changes in gray matter induced by learning–revisited. PLOS ONE 3:e2669
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Eisner-Janowicz I, Barbay S, Hoover E, Stowe AM, Frost SB et al. 2008. Early and late changes in the distal forelimb representation of the supplementary motor area after injury to frontal motor areas in the squirrel monkey. J. Neurophysiol. 100:1498–512
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Engel A, Hijmans BS, Cerliani L, Bangert M, Nanetti L et al. 2014. Inter-individual differences in audio-motor learning of piano melodies and white matter fiber tract architecture. Hum. Brain Mapp. 35:2483–97
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Fan F, Zhu C, Chen H, Qin W, Ji X et al. 2013. Dynamic brain structural changes after left hemisphere subcortical stroke. Hum. Brain Mapp. 34:1872–81
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Fan Y-T, Lin K-C, Liu H-L, Chen Y-L, Wu C-Y 2015a. Changes in structural integrity are correlated with motor and functional recovery after post-stroke rehabilitation. Restor. Neurol. Neurosci. 33:835–44
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Fan Y-T, Wu C-Y, Liu H-L, Lin K-C, Wai Y-Y, Chen Y-L 2015b. Neuroplastic changes in resting-state functional connectivity after stroke rehabilitation. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 9:546
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Frost SB, Barbay S, Friel KM, Plautz EJ, Nudo RJ 2003. Reorganization of remote cortical regions after ischemic brain injury: a potential substrate for stroke recovery. J. Neurophysiol. 89:3205–14
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Gaser C, Schlaug G 2003a. Brain structures differ between musicians and non-musicians. J. Neurosci. 23:9240–45
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Gaser C, Schlaug G 2003b. Gray matter differences between musicians and nonmusicians. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 999:514–17
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Gauthier LV, Taub E, Mark VW, Barghi A, Uswatte G 2012. Atrophy of spared gray matter tissue predicts poorer chronic stroke. Stroke 43:453–57
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Gauthier LV, Taub E, Perkins C, Ortmann M, Mark VW, Uswatte G 2008. Remodeling the brain: plastic structural brain changes produced by different motor therapies after stroke. Stroke 39:1520–25
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Greenough WT, Larson JR, Withers GS 1985. Effects of unilateral and bilateral training in a reaching task on dendritic branching of neurons in the rat motor-sensory forelimb cortex. Behav. Neural Biol. 44:301–14
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Grefkes C, Fink GR 2016. Noninvasive brain stimulation after stroke. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 29:714–20
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Gryga M, Taubert M, Dukart J, Vollmann H, Conde V et al. 2012. Bidirectional gray matter changes after complex motor skill learning. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 6:37
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Han Y, Yang H, Lv YT, Zhu CZ, He Y et al. 2009. Gray matter density and white matter integrity in pianists’ brain: a combined structural and diffusion tensor MRI study. Neurosci. Lett. 459:3–6
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Hand PJ, Wardlaw JM, Rivers CS, Armitage PA, Bastin ME et al. 2006. MR diffusion-weighted imaging and outcome prediction after ischemic stroke. Neurology 66:1159–63
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Hummel F, Cohen L 2006. Non-invasive brain stimulation: a new strategy to improve neurorehabilitation after stroke. Lancet Neurol 5:708–12
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Jancke L, Koeneke S, Hoppe A, Rominger C, Hanggi J 2009. The architecture of the golfer's brain. PLOS ONE 4:e4785
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Jang SH 2010. Prediction of motor outcome for hemiparetic stroke patients using diffusion tensor imaging: a review. NeuroRehabilitation 27:367–72
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Johansen-Berg H, Della-Maggiore V, Behrens TEJ, Smith SM, Paus T 2007. Integrity of white matter in the corpus callosum correlates with bimanual co-ordination skills. Neuroimage 36:Suppl. 2T16–21
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Jones TA, Chu CJ, Grande LA, Gregory AD 1999. Motor skills training enhances lesion-induced structural plasticity in the motor cortex of adult rats. J. Neurosci. 19:10153–63
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Jørgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Vive-Larsen J, Støier M, Olsen TS 1995. Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part I: Outcome. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 76:399–405
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Kleim JA, Barbay S, Cooper NR, Hogg TM, Reidel CN et al. 2002. Motor learning-dependent synaptogenesis is localized to functionally reorganized motor cortex. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 77:63–77
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Kraemer M, Schormann T, Hagemann G, Qi B, Witte OW, Seitz RJ 2004. Delayed shrinkage of the brain after ischemic stroke: preliminary observations with voxel-guided morphometry. J. Neuroimaging 14:265–72
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Krakauer JW 2006. Motor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 19:84–90
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Lakhani B, Borich MR, Jackson JN, Wadden KP, Peters S et al. 2016. Motor skill acquisition promotes human brain myelin plasticity. Neural Plast 2016:7526135
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Lerch JP, Yiu AP, Martinez-Canabal A, Pekar T, Bohbot VD et al. 2010. Maze training in mice induces MRI-detectable brain shape changes specific to the type of learning. Neuroimage 54:2086–95
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Li P, Murphy TH 2008. Two-photon imaging during prolonged middle cerebral artery occlusion in mice reveals recovery of dendritic structure after reperfusion. J. Neurosci. 28:11970–79
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Liang Z, Zeng J, Zhang C, Liu S, Ling X et al. 2009. Progression of pathological changes in the middle cerebellar peduncle by diffusion tensor imaging correlates with lesser motor gains after pontine infarction. Neurorehabilit. Neural Repair 23:692–98
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Lindenberg R, Renga V, Zhu LL, Betzler F, Alsop D, Schlaug G 2010. Structural integrity of corticospinal motor fibers predicts motor impairment in chronic stroke. Neurology 74:280–87
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Maguire EA, Gadian DG, Johnsrude IS, Good CD, Ashburner J et al. 2000. Navigation-related structural change in the hippocampi of taxi drivers. PNAS 97:4398–403
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Makin TR, Scholz J, Filippini N, Henderson Slater D, Tracey I, Johansen-Berg H 2013. Phantom pain is associated with preserved structure and function in the former hand area. Nat. Commun. 4:1570
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Moffat BA, Chenevert TL, Lawrence TS, Meyer CR, Johnson TD et al. 2005. Functional diffusion map: a noninvasive MRI biomarker for early stratification of clinical brain tumor response. PNAS 102:5524–29
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Nitsche MA, Schauenburg A 2003. Facilitation of implicit motor learning by weak transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex in the human. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 15:619–26
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Nudo RJ 2007. Postinfarct cortical plasticity and behavioral recovery. Stroke 38:840–45
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Nudo RJ, Milliken GW 1996. Reorganization of movement representations in primary motor cortex following focal ischemic infarcts in adult squirrel monkeys. J. Neurophysiol. 75:2144–49
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Nudo RJ, Wise BM, SiFuentes F, Milliken GW 1996. Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science 272:1791–94
    [Google Scholar]
  59. O'Shea J, Boudrias MH, Stagg CJ, Bachtiar V, Kischka U et al. 2014. Predicting behavioural response to TDCS in chronic motor stroke. NeuroImage 85:924–33
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Park IS, Lee KJ, Han JW, Lee NJ, Lee WT et al. 2009. Experience-dependent plasticity of cerebellar vermis in basketball players. Cerebellum 8:334–39
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Pineiro R, Pendlebury ST, Smith S, Flitney D, Blamire AM et al. 2000. Relating MRI changes to motor deficit after ischemic stroke by segmentation of functional motor pathways. Stroke A J. Cereb. Circ. 31:672–79
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Quinlan EB, Dodakian L, Otr L, See J, McKenzie A et al. 2015. Neural function, injury, and stroke subtype predict treatment gains after stroke. Ann. Neurol. 77:132–45
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Riley JD, Le V, Der-Yeghiaian L, See J, Newton JM et al. 2011. Anatomy of stroke injury predicts gains from therapy. Stroke 42:421–26
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Rossini PM, Calautti C, Pauri F, Baron JC 2003. Post-stroke plastic reorganisation in the adult brain. Lancet Neurol 2:493–502
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Sagi Y, Tavor I, Hofstetter S, Tzur-Moryosef S, Blumenfeld-Katzir T, Assaf Y 2012. Learning in the fast lane: new insights into neuroplasticity. Neuron 73:1195–203
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Sampaio-Baptista C, Khrapitchev AA, Foxley S, Schlagheck T, Scholz J et al. 2013. Motor skill learning induces changes in white matter microstructure and myelination. J. Neurosci. 33:19499–503
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Sampaio-Baptista C, Scholz J, Jenkinson M, Thomas AG, Filippini N et al. 2014. Gray matter volume is associated with rate of subsequent skill learning after a long term training intervention. Neuroimage 96:158–66
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Schaechter JD, Fricker ZP, Perdue KL, Helmer KG, Vangel MG et al. 2009. Microstructural status of ipsilesional and contralesional corticospinal tract correlates with motor skill in chronic stroke patients. Hum. Brain Mapp. 30:3461–74
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Schaechter JD, Perdue KL 2008. Enhanced cortical activation in the contralesional hemisphere of chronic stroke patients in response to motor skill challenge. Cereb. Cortex 18:638–47
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Schiemanck SK, Kwakkel G, Post MW, Kappelle LJ, Prevo AJ 2006. Predicting long-term independency in activities of daily living after middle cerebral artery stroke: Does information from MRI have added predictive value compared with clinical information. Stroke 37:1050–54
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Schmithorst V, Wilke M 2002. Differences in white matter architecture between musicians and non-musicians: a diffusion tensor imaging study. Neurosci. Lett. 321:57–60
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Scholz J, Klein MC, Behrens TE, Johansen-Berg H 2009. Training induces changes in white-matter architecture. Nat. Neurosci. 12:1370–71
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Shelton F, Reding MJ 2001. Effect of lesion location on upper limb motor recovery after stroke. Stroke 32:107–12
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Shimizu T, Hosaki A, Hino T, Sato M, Komori T et al. 2002. Motor cortical disinhibition in the unaffected hemisphere after unilateral cortical stroke. Brain 125:Pt. 81896–907
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Sisti HM, Geurts M, Gooijers J, Heitger MH, Caeyenberghs K et al. 2012. Microstructural organization of corpus callosum projections to prefrontal cortex predicts bimanual motor learning. Learn. Mem. 19:351–57
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Stagg CJ, Bachtiar V, O'Shea J, Allman C, Bosnell RA et al. 2012. Cortical activation changes underlying stimulation-induced behavioural gains in chronic stroke. Brain 135:276–84
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Stagg CJ, Jayaram G, Pastor D, Kincses ZT, Matthews PM, Johansen-Berg H 2011. Polarity and timing-dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation in explicit motor learning. Neuropsychologia 49:800–4
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Stinear C 2010. Prediction of recovery of motor function after stroke. Lancet Neurol 9:1228–32
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Stinear CM, Barber PA, Petoe M, Anwar S, Byblow WD 2012. The PREP algorithm predicts potential for upper limb recovery after stroke. Brain 135:2527–35
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Stinear CM, Barber PA, Smale PR, Coxon JP, Fleming MK, Byblow WD 2007. Functional potential in chronic stroke patients depends on corticospinal tract integrity. Brain 130:170–80
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Stinear CM, Ward NS 2013. How useful is imaging in predicting outcomes in stroke rehabilitation. Int. J. Stroke 8:33–37
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Tardif CL, Gauthier CJ, Steele CJ, Bazin PL, Schafer A et al. 2016. Advanced MRI techniques to improve our understanding of experience-induced neuroplasticity. Neuroimage 131:55–72
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Taubert M, Draganski B, Anwander A, Muller K, Horstmann A et al. 2010. Dynamic properties of human brain structure: learning-related changes in cortical areas and associated fiber connections. J. Neurosci. 30:11670–77
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Thomalla G, Glauche V, Koch MA, Beaulieu C, Weiller C, Röther J 2004. Diffusion tensor imaging detects early Wallerian degeneration of the pyramidal tract after ischemic stroke. NeuroImage 22:1767–74
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Tomassini V, Jbabdi S, Kincses ZT, Bosnell R, Douaud G et al. 2011. Structural and functional bases for individual differences in motor learning. Hum. Brain Mapp. 32:494–508
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Wenger E, Kuhn S, Verrel J, Martensson J, Bodammer NC et al. 2017. Repeated structural imaging reveals nonlinear progression of experience-dependent volume changes in human motor cortex. Cereb. Cortex 27:2911–25
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Werring DJ, Toosy AT, Clark CA, Geo V, Parker JM et al. 2000. Diffusion tensor imaging can detect and quantify corticospinal tract degeneration after stroke. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 69:269–72
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Xerri C, Merzenich MM, Peterson BE, Jenkins W 1998. Plasticity of primary somatosensory cortex paralleling sensorimotor skill recovery from stroke in adult monkeys. J. Neurophysiol. 79:2119–48
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Xu T, Yu X, Perlik AJ, Tobin WF, Zweig JA et al. 2009. Rapid formation and selective stabilization of synapses for enduring motor memories. Nature 462:915–19
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Zatorre RJ, Fields RD, Johansen-Berg H 2012. Plasticity in gray and white: neuroimaging changes in brain structure during learning. Nat. Neurosci. 15:528–36
    [Google Scholar]
  91. Zhang S, Boyd J, Delaney K, Murphy TH 2005. Rapid reversible changes in dendritic spine structure in vivo gated by the degree of ischemia. J. Neurosci. 25:5333–38
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-neuro-080317-062015
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error