1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Political Science
  4. Volume 18, 2015
  5. Article

Annual Review of Political Science

Volume 18, 2015

Migration, Labor, and the International Political Economy

Abstract

In the field of international political economy, workers are commonly analyzed as objects of global economic forces whose fate is determined by the profit-seeking behaviors of firms and governments. Workers, however, can also assert themselves to protect their rights, and they can emigrate to other countries to find employment. We analyze the literature on the nexus between the international economy and labor with a focus on workers on both the receiving and originating ends of global finance. Beginning with workers as inputs in multinational production, we explore the roles of economic openness, factor endowments, government policy, and unionization as drivers of workers' rights. We then shift to workers as migrant labor and explore the impact of migrants' own cross-border financial transfers—also known as remittances—on political outcomes in their home countries. Our overview not only highlights tremendous progress in explaining the agency and vulnerability of labor in the global economy but also reveals significant weaknesses in recent research, especially a mismatch between micro-level theorizing and macro-level data analysis.

Keyword(s): foreign direct investment, international finance, labor unions, multinational production, remittances, workers' rights
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-020614-094809
2015-05-11
2025-04-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/polisci/18/1/annurev-polisci-020614-094809.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-020614-094809&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abdih Y, Chami R, Dagher J, Montiel P. 2012. Remittances and institutions: Are remittances a curse?. World Dev. 40:657–66 [Google Scholar]
  2. Abouharb MR, Cingranelli D. 2007. Human Rights and Structural Adjustment Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  3. Acevedo J. 2012. Migration, remittances, and politics in postwar El Salvador Presented at Annu. Meet. Am. Polit. Sci. Assoc., New Orleans [Google Scholar]
  4. Adida CL, Girod DM. 2011. Do migrants improve their hometowns? Remittances and access to public services in Mexico, 1995–2000. Comp. Polit. Stud. 44:3–27 [Google Scholar]
  5. Ahlquist JS. 2010. Building strategic capacity: the political underpinnings of coordinated wage bargaining. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 104:171–88 [Google Scholar]
  6. Ahlquist JS, Levi M. 2013. In the Interest of Others: Organizations and Social Activism Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  7. Ahmed FZ. 2012. The perils of unearned foreign income: aid, remittances, and government survival. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 106:146–65 [Google Scholar]
  8. Anner MS. 2011. Solidarity Transformed: Labor Responses to Globalization and Crisis in Latin America Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  9. Ansell B. 2014. The political economy of ownership: housing markets and the welfare state. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 108:383–402 [Google Scholar]
  10. Barrientos S, Smith S. 2007. Do workers benefit from ethical trade? Assessing codes of labour practice in global production systems. Third World Q. 28:713–29 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bartley T. 2007. Institutional emergence in an era of globalization: the rise of transnational private regulation of labor and environmental conditions. Am. J. Sociol. 113:297–351 [Google Scholar]
  12. Bernhagen P, Mitchell NJ. 2010. The private provision of public goods: corporate commitments and the United Nations Global Compact. Int. Stud. Q. 54:1175–87 [Google Scholar]
  13. Blanton SL, Blanton RG. 2009. A sectoral analysis of human rights and FDI: Does industry type matter?. Int. Stud. Q. 53:469–93 [Google Scholar]
  14. Boeri T, Helppie B, Macis M. 2008. Labor regulations in developing countries: a review of the evidence and directions for future research Soc. Protect. Discuss. Pap. 0833, World Bank, Washington, DC [Google Scholar]
  15. Braun S. 2006. Core labour standards and FDI: friends or foes? The case of child labour. Rev. World Econ. Weltwirtsch. Arch. 142:765–91 [Google Scholar]
  16. Bravo J. 2007. Emigration and political engagement in Mexico Work. Pap., Nuffield Coll., Oxford Univ. [Google Scholar]
  17. Busse M, Braun S. 2003. Trade and investment effects of forced labour: an empirical assessment. Int. Labour Rev. 142:49–71 [Google Scholar]
  18. Busse M, Braun S. 2004. Export structure, FDI and child labour. J. Econ. Integr. 19:804–29 [Google Scholar]
  19. Büthe T, Mattli W. 2011. The New Global Rulers: The Privatization of Regulation in the World Economy Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  20. Caraway TL. 2008. Explaining the dominance of legacy unions in new democracies comparative insights from Indonesia. Comp. Polit. Stud. 41:1371–97 [Google Scholar]
  21. Caraway TL, Rickard SJ, Anner MS. 2012. International negotiations and domestic politics: the case of IMF labor market conditionality. Int. Organ. 66:27–61 [Google Scholar]
  22. Chaudhry KA. 1989. The price of wealth: business and state in labor remittance and oil economies. Int. Organ. 43:101–45 [Google Scholar]
  23. Cho S-Y, Dreher A, Neumayer E. 2014. Determinants of anti-trafficking policies: evidence from a new index. Scand. J. Econ. 116:429–54 [Google Scholar]
  24. Christensen D, Wibbels E. 2014. Labor standards, labor endowments, and the evolution of inequality. Int. Stud. Q. 58:362–79 [Google Scholar]
  25. Escriba-Folch A, Meseguer C, Wright J. 2015. Remittances and democratization. Int. Stud. Q. In press [Google Scholar]
  26. Evans PB. 1979. Dependent Development: The Alliance of Multinational, State, and Local Capital in Brazil Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  27. Flanagan RJ. 2006. Globalization and Labor Conditions: Working Conditions and Worker Rights in a Global Economy New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  28. Franzosi R. 1995. The Puzzle of Strikes: Class and State Strategies in Postwar Italy Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  29. Frymer P. 2010. Labor and American politics. Perspect. Polit. 8:609–16 [Google Scholar]
  30. Gallagher ME. 2007. Contagious Capitalism: Globalization and the Politics of Labor in China Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  31. Garcia-Johnson R. 2000. Exporting Environmentalism: U.S. Multinational Chemical Corporations in Brazil and Mexico. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  32. Garrett G. 1998. Global markets and national politics: collision course or virtuous circle?. Int. Organ. 52:787–824 [Google Scholar]
  33. Gereffi G, Humphrey J, Sturgeon T. 2005. The governance of global value chains. Rev. Int. Polit. Econ. 12:78–104 [Google Scholar]
  34. Golden M. 1997. Heroic Defeats: The Politics of Job Loss Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  35. Goodman GL, Hiskey JT. 2008. Exit without leaving: political disengagement in high migration municipalities in Mexico. Comp. Polit. 40:169–88 [Google Scholar]
  36. Graham BAT. 2014. Diaspora-owned firms and social responsibility. Rev. Int. Polit. Econ. 21:432–66 [Google Scholar]
  37. Greenhill B, Mosley L, Prakash A. 2009. Trade-based diffusion of labor rights: a panel study, 1986–2002. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 103:669–90 [Google Scholar]
  38. Gueorguiev D, Malesky E. 2012. Foreign investment and bribery: a firm-level analysis of corruption in Vietnam. J. Asian Econ. 23:111–29 [Google Scholar]
  39. Hafner-Burton EM. 2005. Trading human rights: how preferential trade agreements influence government repression. Int. Organ. 59:593–629 [Google Scholar]
  40. Hafner-Burton EM. 2009. Forced To Be Good: Why Trade Agreements Boost Human Rights Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  41. Hafner-Burton EM. 2014. A social science of human rights. J. Peace Res. 51:273–86 [Google Scholar]
  42. Hainmueller J, Hiscox M, Sequeira S. 2015. Consumer demand for the fair trade label: evidence from a multi-store field experiment. Rev. Econ. Stat. In press. doi: 10.1162/REST_a_00467 [Google Scholar]
  43. Hall PA, Soskice D. 2001. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  44. Haskel JE, Pereira SC, Slaughter MJ. 2007. Does inward foreign direct investment boost the productivity of domestic firms?. Rev. Econ. Stat. 89:482–96 [Google Scholar]
  45. Hassel A. 2008. The evolution of a global labor governance regime. Governance 21:231–51 [Google Scholar]
  46. Helpman E, Melitz MJ, Yeaple SR. 2004. Export versus FDI with heterogeneous firms. Am. Econ. Rev. 94:300–16 [Google Scholar]
  47. Henisz WJ, Williamson OE. 1999. Comparative economic organization: within and between countries. Bus. Polit. 1:261–78 [Google Scholar]
  48. Hirschman AO. 1970. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  49. Hiscox MJ. 2002. International Trade and Political Conflict: Commerce, Coalitions, and Mobility Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  50. Huber E, Stephens JD. 2001. Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets Chicago, IL: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  51. Iversen T. 1999. Contested Economic Institutions: The Politics of Macroeconomics and Wage Bargaining in Advanced Democracies Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  52. Jensen NM. 2013. Domestic institutions and the taxing of multinational corporations. Int. Stud. Q. 57:440–48 [Google Scholar]
  53. Jordaan JA. 2009. Foreign Direct Investment, Agglomeration and Externalities: Empirical Evidence from Mexican Manufacturing Industries Farnham, UK: Ashgate [Google Scholar]
  54. Kapur D. 2010. Diaspora, Development, and Democracy: The Domestic Impact of International Migration from India Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  55. Kay T. 2011. NAFTA and the Politics of Labor Transnationalism New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  56. Kelley J, Simmons B. 2015. Politics by number: indicators as social pressure in international relations. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 59:55–70 [Google Scholar]
  57. Kim M. 2012. Ex ante due diligence: formation of PTAs and protection of labor rights. Int. Stud. Q. 56:704–19 [Google Scholar]
  58. Kucera D. 2002. Core labour standards and foreign direct investment. Int. Labour Rev. 141:31–69 [Google Scholar]
  59. Kurtz MJ, Brooks SM. 2008. Embedding neoliberal reform in Latin America. World Polit. 60:231–80 [Google Scholar]
  60. Leblang D. 2010. Familiarity breeds investment: diaspora networks and international investment. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 104:584–600 [Google Scholar]
  61. Leblang D, Pandya S. 2014. Risky business: migrant networks, political risk, and cross-border venture capital investment Work. Pap., Dep. Polit., Univ. Virginia [Google Scholar]
  62. Levi M. 2003. Organizing power: the prospects for an American labor movement. Perspect. Polit. 1:45–68 [Google Scholar]
  63. Locke RM. 2013. The Promise and Limits of Private Power: Promoting Labor Standards in a Global Economy Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  64. Locke RM, Amengual M, Mangla A. 2009. Virtue out of necessity? Compliance, commitment, and the improvement of labor conditions in global supply chains. Polit. Soc. 37:319–51 [Google Scholar]
  65. Marx K. 1867. Das Kapital: Kritique Der Politische Ökonomie Hamburg: Verl. von Otto Meissner [Google Scholar]
  66. Mascarenhas R, Sandler T. 2014. Remittances and terrorism: a global analysis. Def. Peace Econ. 25:331–47 [Google Scholar]
  67. Meagher K. 2013. Unlocking the informal economy: a literature review on linkages between formal and informal economies in developing countries Work. Pap. 27, Women Informal Employ. Glob. Organ. (WIEGO), Manchester [Google Scholar]
  68. Moran TH. 2002. Beyond Sweatshops: Foreign Direct Investment and Globalization in Developing Countries Washington, DC: Brookings Inst. [Google Scholar]
  69. Mosley L. 2011. Labor Rights and Multinational Production Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  70. Murillo MV. 2005. Partisanship amidst convergence: the politics of labor reform in Latin America. Comp. Polit. 37:441–58 [Google Scholar]
  71. Murillo MV, Schrank A. 2005. With a little help from my friends partisan politics, transnational alliances, and labor rights in Latin America. Comp. Polit. Stud. 38:971–99 [Google Scholar]
  72. Murphy H. 2014. The World Bank and core labour standards: between flexibility and regulation. Rev. Int. Polit. Econ. 21:399–431 [Google Scholar]
  73. Neumayer E, De Soysa I. 2006. Globalization and the right to free association and collective bargaining: an empirical analysis. World Dev. 34:31–49 [Google Scholar]
  74. O'Mahony A. 2013. Political investment: remittances and elections. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 43:799–820 [Google Scholar]
  75. O'Rourke KH, Williamson JG. 2001. Globalization and History: The Evolution of a Nineteenth-Century Atlantic Economy Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  76. Payton A, Woo B. 2014. Attracting investment: governments' strategic role in labor rights protection. Int. Stud. Q. 58:462–74 [Google Scholar]
  77. Pérez-Armendáriz C, Crow D. 2010. Do migrants remit democracy? International migration, political beliefs, and behavior in Mexico. Comp. Polit. Stud. 43:119–48 [Google Scholar]
  78. Peters M. 2015. Open trade, closed borders: immigration policy in the era of globalization. World Polit. 67:114–154 [Google Scholar]
  79. Pfutze T. 2012. Does migration promote democratization? Evidence from the Mexican transition. J. Comp. Econ. 40:159–75 [Google Scholar]
  80. Phillips N. 2013. Unfree labour and adverse incorporation in the global economy: comparative perspectives on Brazil and India. Econ. Soc. 42:171–96 [Google Scholar]
  81. Polanyi K. 2001. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time Boston, MA: Beacon, 2nd ed.. [Google Scholar]
  82. Prakash A, Potoski M. 2007. Investing up: FDI and the cross-country diffusion of ISO 14001 management systems. Int. Stud. Q. 51:723–44 [Google Scholar]
  83. Przeworski A, Wallerstein M. 1988. Structural dependence of the state on capital. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 82:11–29 [Google Scholar]
  84. Regan PM, Frank RW. 2014. Migrant remittances and the onset of civil war. Confl. Manag. Peace Sci. 31:502–520 [Google Scholar]
  85. Robertson GB. 2007. Strikes and labor organization in hybrid regimes. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 101:781–98 [Google Scholar]
  86. Robertson GB, Teitelbaum E. 2011. Foreign direct investment, regime type, and labor protest in developing countries. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 55:665–77 [Google Scholar]
  87. Rodrik D. 1997. Has Globalization Gone Too Far? Washington, DC: Inst. Int. Econ. [Google Scholar]
  88. Rogowski R. 1987. Political cleavages and changing exposure to trade. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 81:1121–37 [Google Scholar]
  89. Rudra N. 2008. Globalization and the Race to the Bottom in Developing Countries: Who Really Gets Hurt? Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  90. Schrank A. 2009. Professionalization and probity in a patrimonial state: labor inspectors in the Dominican Republic. Lat. Am. Polit. Soc. 51:91–115 [Google Scholar]
  91. Scruggs L, Lange P. 2002. Where have all the members gone? Globalization, institutions, and union density. J. Polit. 64:126–53 [Google Scholar]
  92. Shin A. 2012. Mobility of rights: exchange rates, labor mobility, and immigration policies in an integrated world Presented at Annu. Conf. Int. Polit. Econ. Soc., Univ. Va., Charlottesville [Google Scholar]
  93. Silver BJ. 2003. Forces of Labor: Workers' Movements and Globalization Since 1870 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  94. Singer DA. 2010. Migrant remittances and exchange rate regimes in the developing world. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 104:2307–23 [Google Scholar]
  95. Stokes SC, Dunning T, Nazareno M, Brusco V. 2013. Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics London: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  96. Tyburski MD. 2012. The resource curse reversed? Remittances and corruption in Mexico. Int. Stud. Q. 56:339–50 [Google Scholar]
  97. Tyburski MD. 2014. Curse or cure? Migrant remittances and corruption. J. Polit. 76:814–24 [Google Scholar]
  98. Vogel D. 2010. The private regulation of global corporate conduct achievements and limitations. Bus. Soc. 49:68–87 [Google Scholar]
  99. Wallerstein M, Golden M, Lange P. 1997. Unions, employers' associations, and wage-setting institutions in Northern and Central Europe, 1950–1992. Ind. Labor Relat. Rev. 50:379–401 [Google Scholar]
  100. Wellhausen RL. 2015. The Shield of Nationality: When Governments Break Contracts with Foreign Firms Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  101. Western B, Rosenfeld J. 2012. Workers of the world divide: the decline of labor and the future of the middle class. Foreign Aff. 91:88–99 [Google Scholar]
  102. Wibbels E. 2006. Dependency revisited: international markets, business cycles, and social spending in the developing world. Int. Organ. 60:433–68 [Google Scholar]
  103. World Bank 2014. Migration and remittances: recent developments and outlook. Migr. Dev. Brief 221–31 [Google Scholar]
  104. Yang D. 2011. Migrant remittances. J. Econ. Perspect. 25:129–52 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-020614-094809
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error