1932

Abstract

Research on the relationship between territorial disputes, militarized conflict, and economic integration occurs at the intersection of two large research programs in international relations: one linking territorial disputes to violence, and another exploring the effects of conflict on trade and vice versa. Although we know that territorial disputes fuel conflict and that conflict dampens trade, we know less about whether the prospects of economic gains contribute to the settlement of disputes and subsequent compliance with those settlements. I argue that research in this area could profitably adopt an emerging view of borders as institutions that not only distribute territory but also allow cooperation and the production of joint gains. This review identifies gaps in the existing literature on the resolution of territorial disputes and helps to reframe a persistent methodological challenge in this area: missing and noisy data on trade flows.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-020614-095002
2015-05-11
2024-06-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/polisci/18/1/annurev-polisci-020614-095002.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-020614-095002&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Afrika JK, Ajumbo G. 2012. Informal cross border trade in Africa: implications and policy recommendations. Afr. Econ. Brief 3:1–13 [Google Scholar]
  2. Alesina A, Spolaore E. 2003. The Size of Nations Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  3. Allee TL, Huth PK. 2006. Legitimizing dispute settlement: international legal rulings as domestic political cover. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 100:219–34 [Google Scholar]
  4. Anderton CH, Carter JR. 2001. The impact of war on trade: an interrupted times-series study. J. Peace Res. 38:445–57 [Google Scholar]
  5. Barbieri K. 2002. The Liberal Illusion: Does Trade Promote Peace? Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press [Google Scholar]
  6. Barbieri K, Keshk OMG, Pollins BM. 2009. Trading data: evaluating our assumptions and coding rules. Confl. Manage. Peace Sci. 26:471–91 [Google Scholar]
  7. Barbieri K, Levy JS. 1999. Sleeping with the enemy: the impact of war on trade. J. Peace Res. 36:463–79 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bloomberg News 2013. China–Japan dispute takes rising toll on top Asian economies http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-01-08/china-japan-dispute-takes-rising-toll-of-asia-s-top-economies.html [Google Scholar]
  9. Boehmer CR, Jungblut BME, Stoll RJ. 2011. Tradeoffs in trade data: Do our assumptions affect our results?. Confl. Manage. Peace Sci. 28:145–67 [Google Scholar]
  10. Boyd JB. 1979. African boundary conflict: an empirical study. Afr. Stud. Rev. 22:1–14 [Google Scholar]
  11. Brancati D. 2014. Another great illusion: the advancement of separatism through economic integration. Polit. Sci. Res. Methods 2:69–95 [Google Scholar]
  12. Brooks SG. 2005. Producing Security: Multinational Corporations, Globalization, and the Changing Calculus of Conflict Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  13. Carter DB, Goemans HE. 2014. The temporal dynamics of new international borders. Confl. Manage. Peace Sci. 31:285–302 [Google Scholar]
  14. Carter DB, Goemans H. 2010. The making of territorial order: new borders and the emergence of interstate conflict. Int. Organ. 65:275–309 [Google Scholar]
  15. Carter DB, Poast P. 2015. Why do states build walls? Political economy, security, and border stability. J. Confl. Resolut. In press [Google Scholar]
  16. Davis CL, Meunier S. 2011. Business as usual? Economic responses to political tensions. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 55:628–46 [Google Scholar]
  17. Downs GW, Rocke DM, Barsoom PN. 1996. Is the good news about compliance good news about cooperation?. Int. Organ. 50:379–406 [Google Scholar]
  18. Englebert P, Tarango S, Carter M. 2002. Dismemberment and suffocation: a contribution to the debate on African boundaries. Comp. Polit. Stud. 35:1093–118 [Google Scholar]
  19. Fazal TM. 2013. The demise of peace treaties in interstate war. Int. Organ. 67:695–724 [Google Scholar]
  20. Fearon JD. 1995. Rationalist explanations for war. Int. Organ. 49:379–414 [Google Scholar]
  21. Fearon JD. 1998. Bargaining, enforcement, and international cooperation. Int. Organ. 52:269–305 [Google Scholar]
  22. Feenstra RC. 2002. Border effects and the gravity equation: consistent methods for estimation. Scott. J. Polit. Econ. 49:491–506 [Google Scholar]
  23. Fravel MT. 2008. Strong Borders, Secure Nation: Cooperation and Conflict in China's Territorial Disputes Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  24. Gartzke E. 2007. The capitalist peace. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 51:166–91 [Google Scholar]
  25. Gartzke E, Li Q, Boehmer C. 2001. Investing in the peace: economic interdependence and international conflict. Int. Organ. 55:391–438 [Google Scholar]
  26. Gavrilis G. 2008. The Dynamics of Interstate Boundaries Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  27. Gent SE, Shannon M. 2010. The effectiveness of international arbitration and adjudication: getting into a bind. J. Polit. 72:366–80 [Google Scholar]
  28. Gibler DM. 2012. The Territorial Peace: Borders, State Development, and International Conflict Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  29. Gleditsch KS. 2002. Expanded trade and GDP data. J. Confl. Resolut. 46:712–24 [Google Scholar]
  30. Gleditsch KS. 2010. On ignoring missing data and the robustness of trade and conflict results: a reply to Barbieri, Keshk, and Pollins. Confl. Manage. Peace Sci. 27:153–57 [Google Scholar]
  31. Glick R, Taylor AM. 2010. Collateral damage: trade disruption and the economic impact of war. Rev. Econ. Stat. 92:102–27 [Google Scholar]
  32. Goddard SE. 2010. Indivisible Territory and the Politics of Legitimacy: Jerusalem and Northern Ireland Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  33. Goemans HE, Schultz KA. 2015. The politics of territorial disputes: a geospatial approach applied to Africa Work. pap., Dep. Polit. Sci., Univ. Rochester [Google Scholar]
  34. Goldstein JL, Rivers D, Tomz M. 2007. Institutions in international relations: understanding the effects of the GATT and the WTO on world trade. Int. Organ. 61:37–67 [Google Scholar]
  35. Gowa JS. 1994. Allies, Adversaries, and International Trade Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  36. Gowa JS, Mansfield ED. 1993. Power politics and international trade. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 87:408–20 [Google Scholar]
  37. Haas EB. 1958. The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social, and Economic Forces, 1950–1957 Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  38. Hassner RE. 2003. “To halve and to hold”: conflicts over sacred space and the problem of indivisibility. Secur. Stud. 12:1–33 [Google Scholar]
  39. Hathaway OA. 1998. Positive feedback: the impact of trade liberalization on industry demands for protection. Int. Organ. 52:575–612 [Google Scholar]
  40. Hegre H, Oneal JR, Russett B. 2010. Trade does promote peace: new simultaneous estimates of the reciprocal effects of trade and conflict. J. Peace Res. 47:763–74 [Google Scholar]
  41. Helliwell JF. 1998. How Much Do National Borders Matter? Washington, DC: Brookings Inst. Press [Google Scholar]
  42. Hensel PR. 1996. Charting a course to conflict: territorial issues and interstate conflict, 1816–1992. Confl. Manage. Peace Sci. 15:43–73 [Google Scholar]
  43. Hensel PR, Mitchell S. 2005. Issue indivisibility and territorial conflict. Geojournal 64:275–85 [Google Scholar]
  44. Herbst JI. 2000. States and Power in Africa: Comparative Lessons in Authority and Control Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  45. Hollyer JR, Rosendorff BP, Vreeland JR. 2011. Democracy and transparency. J. Polit. 73:1191–205 [Google Scholar]
  46. Holsti KJ. 1991. Peace and War: Armed Conflicts and International Order, 1648–1989 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  47. Hummels D, Lugovskyy V. 2006. Are matched partner trade statistics a usable measure of transportation costs?. Rev. Int. Econ. 14:69–86 [Google Scholar]
  48. Huth PK. 1996. Standing Your Ground: Territorial Disputes and International Conflict Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press [Google Scholar]
  49. Huth PK, Allee TL. 2002. The Democratic Peace and Territorial Conflict in the Twentieth Century Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  50. Huth PK, Croco SE, Appel BJ. 2011. Does international law promote the peaceful settlement of international disputes? Evidence from the study of territorial conflicts since 1945. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 105:415–36 [Google Scholar]
  51. JETRO (Japan External Trade Organization) 2014. Japan's outward FDI by country/region (balance of payments basis, net and flow) https://www.jetro.go.jp/en/reports/statistics/data/country1_e_13cy.xls [Google Scholar]
  52. Kastner SL. 2007. When do conflicting political relations affect international trade?. J. Confl. Resolut. 51:664–88 [Google Scholar]
  53. Keohane RO. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  54. Keshk OMG, Pollins BM, Reuveny R. 2004. Trade still follows the flag: the primacy of politics in a simultaneous model of interdependence and armed conflict. J. Polit. 66:1155–79 [Google Scholar]
  55. Kim HM, Rousseau DL. 2005. The classical liberals were half right (or half wrong): new tests of the “liberal peace,” 1960–88. J. Peace Res. 42:523–43 [Google Scholar]
  56. Kocs SA. 1995. Territorial disputes and interstate war, 1945–1987. J. Polit. 57:159–75 [Google Scholar]
  57. Kupchan C. 2010. How Enemies Become Friends: The Sources of Stable Peace Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  58. Lee H, Mitchell SM. 2012. Foreign direct investment and territorial disputes. J. Confl. Resolut. 56:675–703 [Google Scholar]
  59. Levy JS, Barbieri K. 2004. Trading with the enemy during wartime. Secur. Stud. 13:1–47 [Google Scholar]
  60. Li Q, Sacko DH. 2002. The (ir)relevance of militarized interstate disputes for international trade. Int. Stud. Q. 46:11–43 [Google Scholar]
  61. Long AG. 2008. Bilateral trade in the shadow of armed conflict. Int. Stud. Q. 52:81–101 [Google Scholar]
  62. Lynch P. 1996. Minority Nationalism and European Integration Cardiff: Univ. Wales Press [Google Scholar]
  63. Mani K. 2011. Democratization and Military Transformation in Argentina and Chile: Rethinking Rivalry Boulder, CO: FirstForumPress [Google Scholar]
  64. Mansfield ED, Pollins B. 2003. Economic Interdependence and International Conflict: New Perspectives on an Enduring Debate Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press [Google Scholar]
  65. Mattes M. 2008. The effect of changing conditions and agreement provisions on conflict renegotiation between states with competing claims. Int. Stud. Q. 52:315–34 [Google Scholar]
  66. McCallum J. 1995. National borders matter: Canada–U.S. regional trade patterns. Am. Econ. Rev. 85:615–23 [Google Scholar]
  67. Meadwell H, Martin P. 1996. Economic integration and the politics of independence. Nations Nationalism 2:67–87 [Google Scholar]
  68. Michaels G, Zhi X. 2010. Freedom fries. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 2:256–81 [Google Scholar]
  69. Milner HV. 1988. Resisting Protectionism: Global Industries and the Politics of International Trade Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  70. Mitchell SM, Hensel PR. 2007. International institutions and compliance with agreements. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 51:721–37 [Google Scholar]
  71. Morrow JD. 1997. When do “relative gains” impede trade?. J. Confl. Resolut. 41:12–37 [Google Scholar]
  72. Morrow JD. 1999. How could trade affect conflict?. J. Peace Res. 36:481–89 [Google Scholar]
  73. Morrow JD, Siverson RM, Tabares TE. 1998. The political determinants of international trade: the major powers, 1907–90. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 92:649–61 [Google Scholar]
  74. Owsiak AP. 2012. Signing up for peace: international boundary agreements, democracy, and militarized interstate conflict. Int. Stud. Q. 56:51–66 [Google Scholar]
  75. Pollins BM. 1989a. Conflict, cooperation, and commerce: the effect of international political interactions on bilateral trade flows. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 33:737–61 [Google Scholar]
  76. Pollins BM. 1989b. Does trade still follow the flag?. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 83:465–80 [Google Scholar]
  77. Powell EJ, Wiegand KE. 2014. Strategic selection: political and legal mechanisms of territorial dispute resolution. J. Peace Res. 51:361–74 [Google Scholar]
  78. Powell R. 2006. War as a commitment problem. Int. Organ. 60:169–203 [Google Scholar]
  79. Rasler KA, Thompson WR. 2006. Contested territory, strategic rivalries, and conflict escalation. Int. Stud. Q. 50:145–68 [Google Scholar]
  80. Russett BM, Oneal JR. 2001. Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations New York: W.W. Norton [Google Scholar]
  81. Saideman SM, Ayres RW. 2008. For Kin or Country: Xenophobia, Nationalism, and War New York: Columbia Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  82. Salehyan I. 2009. Rebels without Borders: Transnational Insurgencies in World Politics Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  83. Schultz KA. 2014. What's in a claim? De jure versus de facto borders in interstate territorial disputes. J. Confl. Resolut. 58:1059–84 [Google Scholar]
  84. Schultz KA. 2015. Mapping interstate territorial disputes Work. pap., Dep. Polit. Sci., Stanford Univ. [Google Scholar]
  85. Schultz KA, Goemans HE. 2014. Aims, claims, and the bargaining model Presented at Annu. Meet. Intl. Stud. Assoc., Toronto [Google Scholar]
  86. Simmons BA. 1999. Territorial Disputes and their Resolution: The Case of Ecuador and Peru Washington, DC: US Inst. Peace [Google Scholar]
  87. Simmons BA. 2002. Capacity, commitment, and compliance: international institutions and territorial disputes. J. Confl. Resolut. 46:829–56 [Google Scholar]
  88. Simmons BA. 2005. Rules over real estate: trade, territorial conflict, and international borders as institutions. J. Confl. Resolut. 49:823–48 [Google Scholar]
  89. Smith JM. 2000. The politics of dispute settlement design: explaining legalism in regional trade pacts. Int. Organ. 54:137–80 [Google Scholar]
  90. Solingen E. 2003. Internationalization, coalitions, and regional conflict and cooperation. Economic Interdependence and International Conflict: New Perspectives on an Enduring Debate ED Mansfield, B Pollins 60–88 Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press [Google Scholar]
  91. Tir J. 2006. Redrawing the Map to Promote Peace: Territorial Dispute Management Via Territorial Changes Lanham, KY: Lexington Books [Google Scholar]
  92. Tir J, Diehl PF. 2002. Geographic dimensions of enduring rivalries. Polit. Geogr. 21:263–86 [Google Scholar]
  93. Vasquez JA. 2009. The War Puzzle Revisited Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  94. Vasquez JA, Henehan MT. 2001. Territorial disputes and the probability of war, 1816–1992. J. Peace Res. 38:123–38 [Google Scholar]
  95. World Trade Organization 2014. International trade and market access data http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/statis_bis_e.htm?solution=WTO&path=/Dashboards/MAPS&file=Map.wcdf&bookmarkState={%22impl%22:%22client%22,%22params%22:{%22langParam%22:%22en%22}} [Google Scholar]
  96. Zinn A. 2006. Economic integration and political separatism: parallel trends or causally linked processes. Globalization and Self-Determination: Is the Nation State Under Siege? DR Cameron, G Ranis, A Zinn 233–46 London: Routledge [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-020614-095002
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-020614-095002
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error