1932

Abstract

Most of my work focused on the functioning and the limits of democracy. I place the evolution of our understanding of this bewildering institution in the context of historical events and consider the challenges posed by its current critics. I also reflect on methods, arguing that game theory is the natural language of the social sciences. These ruminations add up to a research agenda.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-021113-122919
2016-05-11
2024-06-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/polisci/19/1/annurev-polisci-021113-122919.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-021113-122919&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Almond GA. 1988. Separate tables: schools and sects in political science. PS Polit. Sci. Polit. 4:828–42 [Google Scholar]
  2. Barro RJ. 1990. Government spending in a simple model of endogenous growth. J. Polit. Econ. 98:103–25 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bates RH, Greif A, Levi M. 1998. Analytic Narratives Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  4. Bell D. 2015. The Chinese Model: Political Meritocracy and the Limits of Democracy Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  5. Benhabib J, Przeworski A. 2006. The political economy of redistribution under democracy. Econ. Theory 29:271–90 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bertola G. 1993. Factor shares and savings in endogenous growth. Am. Econ. Rev. 83:1184–98 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bobbio N. 1987. Democracy and Dictatorship Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press [Google Scholar]
  8. Bobbio N. 1989. The Future of Democracy Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press [Google Scholar]
  9. Cai Y. 2008. Power structure and regime resilience: contentious politics in China. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 38:411–32 [Google Scholar]
  10. Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas (CIS) 2010. Barómetro de Noviembre Estudio No. 2.853. http://www.cis.es/cis/opencms/-Archivos/Marginales/2840_2859/2853/es2853.pdf [Google Scholar]
  11. Cheng Teik G. 1972. Why Indonesia's attempt at democracy in the mid-1950s failed. Modern Asian Stud. 6:225–44 [Google Scholar]
  12. Eltchaninoff M. 2015. Dans La Tete de Vladimir Poutine Paris: Actes Sud [Google Scholar]
  13. Gang G. 2007. Retrospective economic accountability under authortarianism: evidence from China. Polit. Res. Q. 60:378–90 [Google Scholar]
  14. Holmes S. 2015. Imitating democracy, feigning capacity. Democracy in a Russian Mirror A. Przeworski 30–57 New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  15. Holmes S, Sunstein CR. 1999. The Cost of Rights New York: W.W. Norton [Google Scholar]
  16. Institute for Democracy and Cooperation 2012. The United States After the First Obama Term New York: Inst. Democr. Coop. [Google Scholar]
  17. Lagerspetz E. 2010. Wisdom and numbers. Soc. Sci. Inf. 49:29–60 [Google Scholar]
  18. Lindblom C. 1977. Politics and Markets New York: Basic Books [Google Scholar]
  19. Lorentzen PL. 2013. Regularizing rioting: permitting public protest in an authoritarian regime. Q. J. Polit. Sci. 8:127–58 [Google Scholar]
  20. Luo Z, Przeworski A. 2015. Party-state Presented at Annu. Meet. Am. Polit. Sci. Assoc., San Francisco, Sep. 2–5 [Google Scholar]
  21. Miliband R. 1970. The State in a Capitalist Society New York: Basic Books [Google Scholar]
  22. Mill JS. 1977 (1859). The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume XVIII—Essays on Politics and Society Part I JM Robson Toronto: Univ. Toronto Press [Google Scholar]
  23. O'Donnell G. 1993. On the state, democratization, and some conceptual problems: a Latin American view with glances at some postcommunist countries. World Dev. 21:1355–69 [Google Scholar]
  24. Piketty T. 2014. Capital in the Twenty-First Century Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  25. Popper K. 1962. The Open Society and Its Enemies London: Routledge and Kegan Paul [Google Scholar]
  26. Poulantzas N. 1973. Political Power and Social Classes London: New Left Books [Google Scholar]
  27. Przeworski A. 1991. Democracy and the Market New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  28. Przeworski A. 2005. Democracy as an equilibrium. Public Choice 123:253–73 [Google Scholar]
  29. Przeworski A. 2011. Democracy and the Limits of Self-Government New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  30. Przeworski A. 2015a. Economic inequality, political inequality, and redistribution Work. pap., Dep. Polit., New York Univ. [Google Scholar]
  31. Przeworski A. 2015b. Acquiring the habit of changing governments through elections. Comp. Polit. Stud. 48:1–29 [Google Scholar]
  32. Przeworski A, Alvarez M, Cheibub JA, Limongi F. 2000. Democracy and Development New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  33. Przeworski A, Limongi F. 1997. Modernization: theories and facts. World Polit. 49:155–83 [Google Scholar]
  34. Przeworski A, Rivero G, Xi T. 2015. Elections as a method of processing conflicts. Eur. J. Polit. Econ. 39:235–43 [Google Scholar]
  35. Przeworski A, Sprague J. 1986. Paper Stones: A History of Electoral Socialism Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  36. Przeworski A, Wallerstein M. 1982a. The structure of class conflict in democratic capitalist societies. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 76:215–38 [Google Scholar]
  37. Przeworski A, Wallerstein M. 1982b. Democratic capitalism at the crossroads. Democracy 2:52–68 [Google Scholar]
  38. Przeworski A, Wallerstein M. 1988. Structural dependence of the state on capital. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 82:11–29 [Google Scholar]
  39. Roemer J. 1986. Introduction. Analytical Marxism Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  40. Schmitt C. 1993. Théorie de la Constitition. Traduit de l'Allemand par Lilyane Deroche. Paris: Presses Univ. France [Google Scholar]
  41. Schmitter P, Karl TL. 1991. What democracy is and what it is not. J. Democr. 2:75–88 [Google Scholar]
  42. Shapiro I. 1999. Democratic Justice New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  43. Wang S. 2009. Adapting by learning: the evolution of China's rural health care. Modern China 35:370–404 [Google Scholar]
  44. Xu C. 2011. The fundamental institutions of China's reforms and development. J. Econ. Lit. 49:1076–151 [Google Scholar]
  45. Yang X. 2013. A comparative study of constitutional governance and people's democratic systems https://chinacopyrightandmedia.wordpress.com/2013/06/03/the-chinese-debate-on-constitutionalism-texts-and-analyses-part-i/ [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-021113-122919
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error