1932

Abstract

This review sets out a recently developed comparative political economy literature on the Eurozone, which has a basis in both varieties of capitalism and modern macroeconomics. It contrasts the export-oriented, northern European, skill-intensive, coordinated market economies with coordinated wage-bargaining, on the one hand, with the southern European, demand-driven economies with strong public sector unions, on the other. It analyzes the Eurozone as an ongoing grouping of sovereign democratic states, each with strong concerns to remain within the Eurozone but in principle with an exit option. It argues that the origins of the Eurozone and its trajectory primarily reflected national economic concerns and not a political drive toward European integration; and its deflationary preference has been the rational choice of the export-oriented members and their bargaining power in the Eurozone, not an irrational rejection of Keynesianism. The Eurozone functioned well (comparably to the advanced economies outside the Eurozone, though with major imbalances in both) during its “dual growth model” period from inception to the Eurocrisis. The absence of flexible core labor markets suggested by the optimum currency area literature has not impeded its effectiveness; and there has been little Eurozone-generated institution building, except very partially in banking. The only important development, Outright Monetary Transactions, has made the European Central Bank the de facto lender of last resort to fiscally stable member states.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-022615-113243
2016-05-11
2024-06-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/polisci/19/1/annurev-polisci-022615-113243.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-022615-113243&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Alesina A, Ardagna S, Galasso V. 2010. The euro and structural reforms. Europe and the Euro A Alesina, F Giavazzi 57–98 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  2. Baccaro L, Pontusson J. 2016. Rethinking comparative political economy: the growth model perspective. Polit. Soc. In press [Google Scholar]
  3. Baldwin RE. 2006. The euro's trade effects ECB Work. Pap. No. 594. Eur. Central Bank, Frankfurt. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpwps/ecbwp594.pdf [Google Scholar]
  4. Baldwin R, DiNino V, Fontagné L, De Santis R, Taglioni D. 2008. Study on the impact of the euro on trade and foreign direct investment. Rep. No. 321, Directorate General Econ. Financ. Aff. (DG ECFIN), Eur. Comm., Brussels. http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/publication12590_en.pdf [Google Scholar]
  5. Barr D, Breedon F, Miles D. 2003. Life on the outside: economic conditions and prospects outside euroland. Econ. Policy 18:37573–613 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bayoumi T, Eichengreen B. 1997. Ever closer to heaven? An optimum-currency-area index for European countries. Eur. Econ. Rev. 41:3761–70 [Google Scholar]
  7. Beramendi P. 2015. The political geography of the euro crisis Unpublished manuscript, Duke Univ. [Google Scholar]
  8. Blank S, Buch CM. 2007. The euro and cross-border banking: evidence from bilateral data. Comp. Econ. Stud. 49:3389–410 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bun MJ, Klaassen FJ. 2002. Has the euro increased trade? Tinbergen Inst. Disc. Pap. No. 02–108/2, Amsterdam. http://papers.tinbergen.nl/02108.pdf [Google Scholar]
  10. Bun MJ, Klaassen FJ. 2007. The euro effect on trade is not as large as commonly thought. Oxf. Bull. Econ. Stat. 69:4473–96 [Google Scholar]
  11. Calmfors L. 2012. Can the Eurozone develop into a well-functioning fiscal union?. CESifo Forum 13:110–16 [Google Scholar]
  12. Carlin W, Soskice D. 2009. German economic performance: disentangling the role of supply-side reforms, macroeconomic policy and coordinated economy institutions. Soc.-Econ. Rev. 7:167–99 [Google Scholar]
  13. Carlin W, Soskice D. 2015. Macroeconomics: Institutions, Instability and the Financial System Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  14. Coeurdacier N, Martin P. 2009. The geography of asset trade and the euro: insiders and outsiders. J. Jpn. Int. Econ. 23:290–113 [Google Scholar]
  15. Committee for the Study of Economic and Monetary Union 1989. Report on economic and monetary union in the European Community http://aei.pitt.edu/1007 [Google Scholar]
  16. Conway P, Janod V, Nicoletti G. 2005. Product market regulation in OECD countries: 1998 to 2003 OECD Econ. Dep. Work. Pap. No. 419, OECD Publishing, Paris [Google Scholar]
  17. De Grauwe P. 2011. Managing a fragile Eurozone. CESifo Forum. 12:240–45 [Google Scholar]
  18. De Grauwe P. 2012. Economics of Monetary Union Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press, 9th ed.. [Google Scholar]
  19. De Grauwe P. 2013. The political economy of the euro. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 16:153–70 [Google Scholar]
  20. De Sousa J, Lochard J. 2011. Does the single currency affect foreign direct investment?. Scand. J. Econ. 113:3553–78 [Google Scholar]
  21. Dustmann C, Fitzenberger B, Schönberg U, Spitz-Oener A. 2014. From sick man of Europe to economic superstar: Germany's resurgent economy. J. Econ. Perspect. 28:1167–88 [Google Scholar]
  22. Duval R, Elmeskov J. 2005. The effects of EMU on structural reforms in labour and product markets OECD Econ. Dep. Work. Pap. No. 438, OECD Publishing, Paris [Google Scholar]
  23. Dyson K, Featherstone K. 1999. The Road to Maastricht. Negotiating Economic and Monetary Union. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  24. Eichengreen B. 1991. Is Europe an optimum currency area? NBER Work. Pap. No. 3579. http://www.nber.org/papers/w3579 [Google Scholar]
  25. Eichengreen B. 1992. Should the Maastricht Treaty be saved? Princeton Stud. Intl. Finance Pap. No. 74. Intl. Finance Sec., Dep. Econ., Princeton Univ. https://www.princeton.edu/∼ies/IES_Studies/S74.pdf [Google Scholar]
  26. Emmenegger P, Häusermann S, Palier B, Seeleib-Kaiser M. 2012. The Age of Dualization: The Changing Face of Inequality in Deindustrializing Societies New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  27. European Central Bank 2008. Monthly bulletin: 10th anniversary of the ECB. Eur. Central Bank, Frankfurt. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/other/10thanniversaryoftheecbmb200806en.pdf [Google Scholar]
  28. European Commission 2008. EMU@10: Successes and challenges after 10 years of economic and monetary union. Luxembourg: Off. Official Publ. Eur. Commun http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/publication12682_en.pdf [Google Scholar]
  29. European Commission 2015a. Price and cost competitiveness—data section. Annual real effective exchange rates vs. EA18 (1999=100) based on nominal unit wage costs in manufacturing. http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/db_indicators/competitiveness/data_section_en.htm [Google Scholar]
  30. European Commission 2015b. Annual Macro-Economic Database (AMECO). http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/db_indicators/ameco/index_en.htm [Google Scholar]
  31. Featherstone K. 2011. The JCMS Annual Lecture: the Greek sovereign debt crisis and EMU: a failing state in a skewed regime. J. Common Market Stud. 49:2193–217 [Google Scholar]
  32. Fernández-Villaverde J, Garicano L, Santos T. 2013. Political credit cycles: the case of the Eurozone. J. Econ. Perspect. 27:3145–66 [Google Scholar]
  33. Flanagan RJ, Soskice DW, Ulman L. 1983. Unionism, Economic Stabilization, and Incomes Policies: European Experience Washington, DC: Brookings Inst. [Google Scholar]
  34. Hall PA. 2001. Organized market economies and unemployment in Europe: Is it finally time to accept liberal orthodoxy. Unemployment in the New Europe N Bermeo 52–86 New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  35. Hall PA. 2012. The economics and politics of the Euro crisis. Ger. Polit. 21:4355–71 [Google Scholar]
  36. Hall PA. 2014. Varieties of capitalism and the Euro crisis. West Eur. Polit. 37:61223–43 [Google Scholar]
  37. Hall PA, Franzese RJ. 1998. Mixed signals: central bank independence, coordinated wage bargaining, and European Monetary Union. Int. Organ. 52:3505–35 [Google Scholar]
  38. Hall PA, Soskice DW. 2001. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  39. Hancké B. 2013. Unions, Central Banks, and EMU: Labour Market Institutions and Monetary Integration in Europe Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  40. Hancké B, Rhodes M. 2005. EMU and labor market institutions in Europe: the rise and fall of national social pacts. Work Occup. 32:2196–228 [Google Scholar]
  41. Hardiman N. 2012. Irish Governance in Crisis Manchester, UK: Manchester Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  42. Hassel A. 2014. Adjustments in the Eurozone: varieties of capitalism and the crisis in Southern Europe LSE ‘Europe in Question’ Ser. (LEQS) Disc. Pap. No. 76, Eur. Inst., London School Econ. Polit. Sci., London. http://www.lse.ac.uk/europeanInstitute/LEQS/LEQSPaper76.pdf [Google Scholar]
  43. Häusermann S, Schwander H. 2012. Varieties of dualization? Labor market segmentation and insider–outsider divides across regimes. The Age of Dualization: The Changing Face of Inequality in Deindustrializing Societies P Emmenegger, S Häusermann, B Palier, M Seeleib-Kaiser 27–51 New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  44. Hellwig MF. 2014. Yes Virginia, there is a European Banking Union! But it may not make your wishes come true. Preprint No. 2014/12, Max Planck Inst. Res. Coll. Goods, Bonn. www.coll.mpg.de/pdf_dat/2014_12online.pdf [Google Scholar]
  45. Hooghe L, Marks G. 2009. A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: from permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 39:11–23 [Google Scholar]
  46. Hopkin J. 2015. The troubled south: the euro experience in Italy and Spain. The Future of the Euro M Blyth, M Matthijs 161–84 New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  47. IMF 2015. World Economic Outlook database, April 2015. International Monetary Fund world economic and financial surveys. http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2015/01/weodata/index.aspx [Google Scholar]
  48. Iversen T. 1999. Contested Economic Institutions: The Politics of Macroeconomics and Wage Bargaining in Advanced Democracies Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  49. Iversen T, Soskice D. 2012. Modern capitalism and the advanced nation state: understanding the causes of the crisis. Coping with Crisis: Government Reactions to the Great Recession N Bermeo, J Pontusson 35–64 New York: Russell Sage Found. [Google Scholar]
  50. Iversen T, Soskice D. 2013. A structural-institutional explanation of the Eurozone crisis Unpublished manuscript. Dep. Gov., Harvard Univ. http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/∼iversen/PDFfiles/Iversen&Soskice_euro2015.pdf [Google Scholar]
  51. Iversen T, Soskice D. 2015. Democratic limits to redistribution: inclusionary versus exclusionary coalitions in the knowledge economy. World Polit. 67:2185–225 [Google Scholar]
  52. Johnston A, Hancké B, Pant S. 2014. Comparative institutional advantage in the European sovereign debt crisis. Comp. Polit. Stud. 47:131771–1800 [Google Scholar]
  53. Johnston A, Regan A. 2015. European monetary integration and the incompatibility of national varieties of capitalism. J. Common Market Stud. 54:2318–36 [Google Scholar]
  54. Kenen P. 1969. The optimum currency area: an eclectic view. Monetary Problems of the International Economy R Mundell, A Swoboda 41–60 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  55. Krugman P. 2013a. The harm Germany does. N. Y. Times Nov. 1. http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/11/01/the-harm-germany-does/?_r=0 [Google Scholar]
  56. Krugman P. 2013b. Those depressing Germans. N. Y. Times Nov. 3. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/04/opinion/krugman-those-depressing-germans.html [Google Scholar]
  57. Lane PR. 2008. EMU and financial integration Disc. Pap. No. 272, Inst. Intl. Integr. Stud., Dublin. https://www.tcd.ie/iiis/documents/discussion/pdfs/iiisdp272.pdf [Google Scholar]
  58. Lane PR. 2012. The European sovereign debt crisis. J. Econ. Perspect. 26:349–67 [Google Scholar]
  59. Manow P. 2015. Workers, farmers and Catholicism: a history of political class coalitions and the south-European welfare state regime. J. Eur. Soc. Policy 25:132–49 [Google Scholar]
  60. Marsh D. 2011. The Euro: The Battle for the New Global Currency New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  61. McKinnon RI. 1963. Optimum currency areas. Am. Econ. Rev. 53:4717–25 [Google Scholar]
  62. Melitz J, Zumer F. 2002. Regional redistribution and stabilization by the center in Canada, France, the UK and the US: a reassessment and new tests. J. Public Econ. 86:2263–86 [Google Scholar]
  63. Micco A, Stein E, Ordoñez G. 2003. The currency union effect on trade: early evidence from EMU. Econ. Policy 18:37315–56 [Google Scholar]
  64. Moravcsik A. 1998. The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  65. Moravcsik A. 2012. Europe after the crisis. How to sustain a common currency. Foreign Aff. 91:3) (May/June53–68 [Google Scholar]
  66. Mundell RA. 1961. A theory of optimum currency areas. Am. Econ. Rev. 51:4657–65 [Google Scholar]
  67. Newman A. 2015. The reluctant leader: Germany's euro experience and the long shadow of reunification. The Future of the Euro M Matthijs, M Blyth 117–35 New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  68. Niemann A. 2006. Explaining Decisions in the European Union Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  69. OECD 2015a. Annual national accounts database. http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=SNA_TABLE1 [Google Scholar]
  70. OECD 2015b. Key short-term economic indicators http://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?DatasetCode=KEI [Google Scholar]
  71. OECD 2015c. Economic outlook database. No. 97, June 2015. http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=EO [Google Scholar]
  72. OECD 2015d. Monthly monetary and financial statistics (MEI). https://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?queryid=6779 [Google Scholar]
  73. OECD 2015e. Strictness of employment protection—individual and collective dismissals (regular contracts). Labour force statistics. https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=EPL_OV [Google Scholar]
  74. Petroulas P. 2007. The effect of the euro on foreign direct investment. Eur. Econ. Rev. 51:61468–91 [Google Scholar]
  75. Rosamond B. 2000. Theories of European Integration Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan [Google Scholar]
  76. Rueda D. 2005. Insider–outsider politics in industrialized democracies: the challenge to social democratic parties. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 99:161–74 [Google Scholar]
  77. Schelkle W. 2014. The insurance potential of a non-optimal currency area. Democratic Politics in a European Union Under Stress O Cramme, S Hobolt 137–54 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  78. Schimmelfennig F. 2014. European integration in the Euro Crisis: the limits of postfunctionalism. J. Eur. Integration 36:3321–37 [Google Scholar]
  79. Soskice D. 2007. Macroeconomics and varieties of capitalism. Beyond Varieties of Capitalism: Conflict, Contradictions, and Complementarities in the European Economy B Hancké, M Rhodes, M Thatcher 89–121 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  80. Soskice D, Iversen T. 1998. Multiple wage-bargaining systems in the single European currency area. Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy 14:3110–24 [Google Scholar]
  81. Soskice D, Iversen T. 2000. The nonneutrality of monetary policy with large price or wage setters. Q. J. Econ. 115:1265–84 [Google Scholar]
  82. Szász A. 1999. The Road to European Monetary Union London: Macmillan [Google Scholar]
  83. Wiener A, Diez T. 2004. European Integration Theory Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-022615-113243
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-022615-113243
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error