1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Political Science
  4. Volume 27, 2024
  5. Article

Annual Review of Political Science

Volume 27, 2024

Democratic Norms and the Ethics of Resistance

Abstract

Most democratic theories recognize that democracy requires widespread adherence to both formal and informal norms that constrain the use of power and structure relationships among citizens. Most also recognize that a healthy democracy requires some forms of activism or resistance that transgress those norms to disrupt hierarchies, challenge injustices, and drive discursive innovation. Recent systemic theories of democracy show that democratic theory can incorporate these two realities without contradiction, but it is not clear whether an ethic of citizenship can do the same. This article reviews recent literature on the purposes and ethics of transgressive politics while also drawing attention to neglected questions about the functions of democratic norms and how they are maintained amid transgressions. These are questions that must be addressed by an ethic of citizenship that can navigate the tension between the authority of democratic norms and the constructive potential of transgressive politics.

Keyword(s): activism, democratic norms, democratic systems, disobedience, dissent, resistance
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-041322-025033
2024-07-29
2024-12-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/polisci/27/1/annurev-polisci-041322-025033.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-041322-025033&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Aitchison G. 2018.. (Un)civil disobedience. . Raisons Politiques 69:(1):5–12
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  2. Akbar AA. 2020.. The radical possibilities of protest. . See Schwartzberg 2020 , pp. 64–79
  3. Anderson B. 2006.. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London:: Verso Books
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Betasamosake Simpson L. 2017.. As We Have Always Done: Indigenous Freedom Through Radical Resistance. Minneapolis:: Univ. Minn. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Boggs C. 1977.. Marxism, prefigurative Communism, and the problem of workers’ control. . Radic. Am. 11:(6):99–122
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bok S. 1982.. Secrets: On the Ethics of Concealment and Revelation. New York:: Pantheon Books
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Boot ER. 2019.. The Ethics of Whistleblowing. London/New York:: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Boxill BR. 1976.. Self-respect and protest. . Philos. Public Aff. 6:(1):58–69
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Brison SJ. 2020.. “ No ways tired”: an antidote for protest fatigue in the Trump era. . See Schwartzberg 2020 , pp. 189–98
  10. Brownlee K. 2012.. Conscience and Conviction: The Case for Civil Disobedience. Oxford, UK:: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Bulman-Pozen J, Pozen D. 2015.. Uncivil obedience. . Columbia Law Rev. 115:(4):809–72
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Cabrera L. 2021.. Global citizenship, global civil disobedience, and political vices. . See Scheuerman 2021a , pp. 313–37
  13. Calhoun C. 2000.. The virtue of civility. . Philos. Public Aff. 29:(3):251–75
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  14. Celikates R. 2016.. Democratizing civil disobedience. . Philos. Soc. Crit. 42:(10):982–94
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  15. Chapman EB. 2020.. Shared agency and the ethics of democracy. . Georgetown J. Law Public Policy 18:(2):705–32
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Çidam Ç, Scheuerman WE, Delmas C, Pineda E, Celikates R, Livingston A. 2020.. Theorizing the politics of protest: contemporary debates on civil disobedience. . Contemp. Political Theory 19:(3):513–46
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  17. Clayton K, Davis NT, Nyhan B, Porter E, Ryan TJ, Wood TJ. 2021.. Elite rhetoric can undermine democratic norms. . PNAS 118:(23):e2024125118
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  18. Coulthard GS. 2014.. Red Skin White Masks: Rejecting the Colonial Politics of Recognition. Minneapolis:: Univ. Minn. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Cross B. 2021.. Deliberative systems theory and activism. . Crit. Rev. Int. Soc. Political Philos. 24:(6):866–83
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  20. Dean J. 1996.. Solidarity of Strangers: Feminism After Identity Politics. Berkeley:: Univ. Calif. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Delmas C. 2015.. The ethics of government whistleblowing. . Soc. Theory Pract. 41:(1):77–105
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  22. Delmas C. 2020.. A Duty to Resist: When Disobedience Should Be Uncivil. New York:: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Delmas C. 2021.. (In)Civility. . See Scheuerman 2021a , pp. 203–30
  24. Delmas C, Brownlee K. 2021.. Civil disobedience. . In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. EN Zalta, U Nodelman. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/civil-disobedience/
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Demetriou D, Wingo A. 2018.. The ethics of racist monuments. . In The Palgrave Handbook of Philosophy and Public Policy, ed. D Boonin , pp. 341–55. London:: Palgrave Macmillan
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Dhillon J. 2019.. Decolonize This Place and Radical Solidarity: an interview with Nitasha Dhillon and Amin Husain. . In Standing with Standing Rock: Voices from the #NODAPL Movement, ed. N Estes, J Dhillon , pp. 344–51. Minneapolis:: Univ. Minn. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Dryzek J. 2012.. Foundations and Frontiers of Deliberative Governance. Oxford, UK:: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  28. DuFord R. 2022.. Solidarity in Conflict: A Democratic Theory. Stanford, CA:: Stanford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Franks B. 2003.. The direct action ethic from 59 upwards. . Anarch. Stud. 11:(1):13–41
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Fung A. 2005.. Deliberation before the revolution: toward an ethics of deliberative democracy in an unjust world. . Political Theory 33:(2):397–419
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  31. Gilson L. 2023.. Activism versus criticism? The case for a distinctive role for social critics. . Am. Political Sci. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305542300045X
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Gourevitch A. 2018.. The right to strike: a radical view. . Am. Political Sci. Rev. 112:(4):905–17
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  33. Gutmann A, Thompson D. 1996.. Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA:: Belknap
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Harcourt B. 2012.. The politics of incivility. . Ariz. Law Rev. 54::345–73
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Hayward CR. 2020.. Disruption: What is it good for?. J. Politics 82:(2):448–59
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  36. Honig B. 2021.. A Feminist Theory of Refusal. Cambridge, MA:: Harvard Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Hooker J. 2009.. Race and the Politics of Solidarity. New York:: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Hooker J. 2020.. Disobedience in black: on race and dissent. . See Schwartzberg 2020 , pp. 45–63
  39. Humphrey M, Stears M. 2006.. Animal rights protest and the challenge to deliberative democracy. . Econ. Soc. 35:(3):400–422
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  40. Hussain W. 2012.. Is ethical consumerism an impermissible form of vigilantism?. Philos. Public Aff. 40:(2):111–43
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  41. Kolers A. 2012.. Dynamics of solidarity. . J. Political Philos. 20:(4):365–83
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  42. Lai T-H. 2020.. Political vandalism as counter-speech: a defense of defacing and destroying tainted monuments. . Eur. J. Philos. 28::602–16
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  43. Lai T-H, Lim C-M. 2023.. Environmental activism and the fairness of costs argument for civil disobedience. . J. Am. Philos. Assoc. 9:(3):490–509
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  44. Levitsky S, Ziblatt D. 2018.. How Democracies Die. New York:: Crown
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Lim C-M. 2020.. Vandalizing tainted commemorations. . Philos. Public Aff. 48:(2):186–216
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  46. Maeckelbergh M. 2011.. Doing is believing: prefiguration as strategic practice in the alterglobalization movement. . Soc. Mov. Stud. 10:(1):1–20
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Mansbridge J, Bohman J, Chambers S, Christiano T, Fung A, et al. 2012.. A systemic approach to deliberative democracy. . In Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale, ed. J Parkinson, J Mansbridge , pp. 1–26. New York:: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Mantena K. 2012.. Another realism: the politics of Gandhian nonviolence. . Am. Political Sci. Rev. 106:(2):455–70
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  49. McAdam D. 1996.. The framing function of movement tactics: strategic dramaturgy in the American Civil Rights Movement. . In Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements, ed. D McAdam, JD McCarthy, M Zald , pp. 338–55. Cambridge/New York:: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Medearis J. 2004.. Social movements and deliberative democratic theory. . Br. J. Political Sci. 35::53–75
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  51. Medina J. 2020.. No justice, no peace: uncivil protest and the politics of confrontation. . See Schwartzberg 2020 , pp. 122–60
  52. Moody-Adams M. 2022.. Making Space for Justice: Social Movements, Collective Imagination, and Political Hope. New York:: Columbia Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Moraro P. 2019.. Civil Disobedience: A Philosophical Overview. Lanham, MD:: Rowman & Littlefield
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Muirhead R, Rosenblum NL. 2020.. The political theory of parties and partisanship: catching up. . Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 23::95–110
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  55. Ogunye T. 2015.. Global justice and transnational civil disobedience. . Ethics Glob. Politics 8:(1):27217
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  56. Olberding A. 2019.. The Wrong of Rudeness: Learning Modern Civility from Ancient Chinese Philosophy. New York:: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Pasternak A. 2018.. Political rioting: a moral assessment. . Philos. Public Aff. 46:(4):384–418
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  58. Pineda E. 2021a.. Seeing Like an Activist: Civil Disobedience and the Civil Rights Movement. Oxford/New York:: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Pineda E. 2021b.. Martin Luther King, Jr. and the politics of disobedient civility. . See Scheuerman 2021a , pp. 56–79
  60. Piven FF. 2006.. Challenging Authority: How Ordinary People Change America. Lanham, MD:: Rowman & Littlefield
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Quong J. 2022.. Public reason. . In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. EN Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2022/entries/public-reason/
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Raekstad P. 2017.. Revolutionary practice and prefigurative politics: a clarification and defense. . Constellations 25::359–72
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  63. Rawls J. 1999.. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA:: Belknap. Rev. ed.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Sabl A. 2002.. Ruling Passions: Political Offices and Democratic Ethics. Princeton, NJ:: Princeton Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Sabl A. 2021.. Realist disobedience. . See Scheuerman 2021a , pp. 153–77
  66. Sadovsky RG. 2023.. Political etiquette. . Philos. Stud. 180::919–40
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  67. Salkin W. 2022.. Democracy within, justice without: the duties of informal political representatives. . Noûs 56:(4):940–71
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  68. Sanders LM. 1997.. Against deliberation. . Political Theory 25:(3):347–76
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  69. Scheuerman WE. 2021a.. The Cambridge Companion to Civil Disobedience. Cambridge, UK:: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Scheuerman WE. 2021b.. Why, once again, civil disobedience. . See Scheuerman 2021a , pp. 1–25
  71. Scheuerman WE. 2021c.. Whistleblowing as civil disobedience. . See Scheuerman 2021a , pp. 384–406
  72. Scholz S. 2008.. Political Solidarity. University Park:: Pa. State Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Schulz J. 2019.. Must Rhodes fall? The significance of commemoration in the struggle for relations of respect. . J. Political Philos. 27:(2):166–86
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  74. Schwartzberg M. 2020.. Protest and Dissent: NOMOS LXII. New York:: New York Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Shelby T. 2016.. Dark Ghettos: Injustice, Dissent, and Reform. Cambridge, MA:: Belknap
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Sitrin M. 2006.. Horizontalism: Voices of Popular Power in Argentina. Edinburgh:: AK Press
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Smith W. 2018.. Disruptive democracy: the ethics of direct action. . Raisons Politiques 69:(1):13–27
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  78. Stanley S. 2014.. Toward a reconciliation of integration and racial solidarity. . Contemp. Political Theory 13:(1):46–63
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  79. Stears M. 2010.. Demanding Democracy: American Radicals in Search of a New Politics. Princeton, NJ:: Princeton Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Stokes S. 2020.. Are protests good or bad for democracy?. See Schwartzberg 2020 , pp. 269–83
  81. Taiwo O. 2020.. Civility as self-determination. . Philos. East West 70:(4):1073–83
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  82. Talisse RB. 2005.. Deliberativist responses to activist challenges. . Philos. Soc. Crit. 31:(4):423–44
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  83. Törnberg A. 2021.. Prefigurative politics and social change: a typology drawing on transition studies. . Distinktion J. Soc. Theory 22:(1):83–107
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  84. Walzer M. 1999.. Deliberation, and what else?. In Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement, ed. S Macedo , pp. 58–69. New York:: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Warren ME. 2017.. A problem-based approach to democratic theory. . Am. Political Sci. Rev. 111:(1):39–53
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  86. Woodly DR. 2015.. The Politics of Common Sense: How Social Movements Use Public Discourse to Change Politics and Win Acceptance. Oxford/New York:: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Yates L. 2015.. Rethinking prefiguration: alternatives, micropolitics and goals in social movements. . Soc. Mov. Stud. 14:(1):1–21
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Young IM. 2001.. Activist challenges to deliberative democracy. . Political Theory 29:(5):670–90
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  89. Young IM. 2002.. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford, UK:: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Zerilli L. 2014.. Against civility: a feminist perspective. . In Civility, Legality, and Justice in America, ed. A Sarat , pp. 107–31. Cambridge, UK:: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Zheng R. 2023.. Reconceptualizing solidarity as power from below. . Philos. Stud. 180::893–917
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-041322-025033
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error