1932

Abstract

Debates over the development and density of housing have gained visibility in recent years as housing costs have skyrocketed in many metropolitan areas. With those who seek to limit development (NIMBYs) on one side and those who seek to promote it (YIMBYs) on the other, scholarly attention has turned to understanding preferences and power in the politics of development. This article reviews scholarship relating to the politics of land use. After discussing the history of land use regulation, we describe who the important actors are (and, generally, what they want) in the politics of land use; we explain the distribution of power and inequality in the politics of land use; and we briefly review how land use regulation affects other societal outcomes. We end with a set of unanswered political questions that could push the field forward.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-041322-041133
2024-07-29
2025-02-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/polisci/27/1/annurev-polisci-041322-041133.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-041322-041133&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abrams C. 1955.. Forbidden Neighbors: A Study of Prejudice in Housing. New York:: Harper
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Acolin A, Wachter S. 2017.. Opportunity and housing access. . Cityscape 19:(1):13550
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Advis. Comm. Zoning. 1926.. A Standard State Zoning Enabling Act Under Which Municipalities May Adopt Zoning Regulations. Washington, DC:: Gov. Print. Off. https://planning-org-uploaded-media.s3.amazonaws.com/legacy_resources/growingsmart/pdf/SZEnablingAct1926.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Albouy D, Ehrlich G. 2018.. Housing productivity and the social cost of land-use restrictions. . J. Urban Econ. 107::10120
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  5. Anzia SF. 2022.. Local Interests: Politics, Policy, and Interest Groups in US City Governments. Chicago:: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Aoki K. 1992.. Race, space, and place: the relation between architectural modernism, post-modernism, urban planning, and gentrification. . Fordham Urban Law J. 20:(4):699829
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Baar KK. 1996.. The anti-apartment movement in the US and the role of land use regulations in creating housing segregation. . Neth. J. Hous. Built Environ. 11:(4):35979
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  8. Babcock RF. 1966.. The Zoning Game: Municipal Practices and Policies. Madison:: Univ. Wisc. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Baer WC. 2008.. California's fair-share housing 1967–2004: the planning approach. . J. Plan. Hist. 7:(1):4871
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  10. Banfield E, Wilson JQ. 1966.. City Politics. New York:: Vintage
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Banzhaf HS. 2014.. The market for local public good. . Case Western Reserve Law Rev. 64:(4):144180
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Banzhaf HS, Mangum K. 2019.. Capitalization as a two-part tariff: The role of zoning. NBER Work. Pap. 25699. https://www.nber.org/papers/w25699
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Bates LJ, Santerre RE. 1994.. The determinants of restrictive residential zoning: some empirical findings. . J. Reg. Sci. 34:(2):25363
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  14. Been V. 2018.. City NIMBYs. . J. Land Use Environ. Law 33:(2):21750
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Been V, Ellen IG, O'Regan K. 2019.. Supply skepticism: housing supply and affordability. . Hous. Policy Debate 29:(1):2540
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  16. Been V, Madar J, McDonnell S. 2014.. Urban land-use regulation: Are homevoters overtaking the growth machine?. J. Empir. Legal Stud. 11:(2):22765
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  17. Berry C. 2009.. Imperfect Union: Representation and Taxation in Multilevel Governments. New York:: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Bosselman FP, Callies DL. 1972.. The quiet revolution in land use control. Rep. , Counc. Environ. Qual., Washington, DC:
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Bridges A. 1997.. Morning Glories: Municipal Reform in the Southwest. Princeton, NJ:: Princeton Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Briffault R. 1990.. Our localism: Part II—localism and legal theory. . Columbia Law Rev. 90:(2):346454
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  21. Brownell BA. 1975.. The commercial-civic elite and city planning in Atlanta, Memphis, and New Orleans in the 1920s. . J. South. Hist. 41:(3):33968
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  22. Burns N. 1994.. The Formation of American Local Governments: Private Values in Public Institutions. New York:: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Clingermayer JC. 1994.. Electoral representation, zoning politics, and the exclusion of group homes. . Political Res. Q. 47:(4):96984
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  24. Collins WJ. 2004.. The political economy of fair housing laws prior to 1968. NBER Work. Pap. 10610. https://www.nber.org/papers/w10610
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Cramer K. 2020.. Understanding the role of racism in contemporary US public opinion. . Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 23::15369
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  26. Dahl RA. 1961.. Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven, CT:: Yale Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Danielson MN. 1976.. The Politics of Exclusion. New York:: Columbia Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Davidoff P, Brooks ME. 1976.. Zoning out the poor. . In Suburbia: The American Dream and Dilemma, ed. PC Dolce , pp.13566. Garden City, NY:: Anchor/Doubleday
    [Google Scholar]
  29. de Benedictis-Kessner J, Jones D, Warshaw C. 2024.. How partisanship in cities influences housing policy. . Am. J. Political Sci. In press
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Denzau AT, Weingast BR. 1982.. The political economy of land use regulation. . Urban Law Annu. 23::385405
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Dilworth R. 2005.. The Urban Origins of Suburban Autonomy. Cambridge, MA:: Harvard Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Dokshin FA. 2016.. Whose backyard and what's at issue? Spatial and ideological dynamics of local opposition to fracking in New York State, 2010 to 2013. . Am. Sociol. Rev. 81:(5):92148
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  33. Downs A. 1994.. New Visions for Metropolitan America. Washington, DC:: Brookings Inst.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Dreier P, Mollenkopf J, Swanstrom T. 2001.. Place Matters: Metropolitics for the Twenty-First Century. Lawrence:: Univ. Press Kansas
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Duane D. 2023.. A tale of paradise, parking lots and my mother's Berkeley backyard. . N.Y. Times Mag., May 30. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/30/magazine/housing-berkeley-yimby-fight.html
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Einstein KL, Glick DM, Palmer M. 2019.. Neighborhood Defenders: Participatory Politics and America's Housing Crisis. Cambridge, UK:: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Einstein KL, Kogan V. 2016.. Pushing the city limits: policy responsiveness in municipal government. . Urban Aff. Rev. 52:(1):332
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  38. Ellickson RC. 1973.. Alternatives to zoning: covenants, nuisance rules, and fines as land use controls. . Univ. Chicago Law Rev. 40:(4):681781
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  39. Elmendorf CS. 2019.. Beyond the double veto: housing plans as preemptive intergovernmental compacts. . Hastings Law J. 71:(1):79150
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Elmendorf CS, Biber E, Monkkonen P, O'Neill M. 2020.. Making it work: legal foundations for administrative reform of California's housing framework. . Ecol. Law Q. 47::9731060
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Elmendorf CS, Nall C, Oklobdzija S. 2022.. Folk economics and the persistence of political opposition to new housing. . City J., Nov. 28. https://www.city-journal.org/article/folk-economics-and-the-politics-of-housing
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Esaiasson P. 2014.. NIMBYism—a re-examination of the phenomenon. . Soc. Sci. Res. 48::18595
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  43. Feiock RC. 2004.. Politics, institutions and local land-use regulation. . Urban Stud. 41:(2):36375
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  44. Fennell LA. 2006.. Exclusion's attraction: land use controls in Tieboutian perspective. Work. Pap. 57 , Univ. Ill. Law Econ., Champaign, IL:. https://law.bepress.com/uiuclwps/art57/
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Fischel WA. 1990.. Do growth controls matter? Work. Pap. 87-9 , Lincoln Inst. Land Policy, Cambridge, MA:. https://www.lincolninst.edu/publications/working-papers/do-growth-controls-matter
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Fischel WA. 2001.. The Homevoter Hypothesis: How Home Values Influence Local Government Taxation, School Finance, and Land-Use Policies. Cambridge, MA:: Harvard Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Fischel WA. 2015.. Zoning Rules! The Economics of Land Use Regulation. Hollis, NH:: Puritan
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Fischer CS, Stockmayer G, Stiles J, Hout M. 2004.. Distinguishing the geographic levels and social dimensions of US metropolitan segregation, 1960–2000. . Demography 41:(1):3759
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  49. Fischler R. 1998.. Health, safety, and the general welfare: markets, politics, and social science in early land-use regulation and community design. . J. Urban Hist. 24:(6):675719
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  50. Folke O, Martén L, Rickne J, Dahlberg M. 2021.. Politicians’ neighbourhoods: Where do they live and does it matter? Nottingham Interdiscip. Cent. Econ. Political Res. Work. Pap. 2021-03. https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/research/groups/nicep/working-papers/2021/nicep-2021-03.aspx
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Frasure-Yokley L. 2015.. Racial and Ethnic Politics in American Suburbs. New York:: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Freemark Y. 2020.. Upzoning Chicago: impacts of a zoning reform on property values and housing construction. . Urban Aff. Rev. 56:(3):75889
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  53. Freudenburg WR, Pastor SK. 1992.. NIMBYs and LULUs: stalking the syndromes. . J. Soc. Issues 48:(4):3961
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  54. Friesema H. 1969.. Black control of central cities: the hollow prize. . J. Am. Inst. Plan. 35:(2):7579
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  55. Frug G. 2002.. Beyond regional government. . Harvard Law Rev. 115:(7):1763836
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  56. Gabbe CJ. 2018.. Why are regulations changed? A parcel analysis of upzoning in Los Angeles. . J. Plan. Educ. Res. 38:(3):289300
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Glaeser E, Gyourko J. 2018.. The economic implications of housing supply. . J. Econ. Perspect. 32:(1):330
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  58. Glaeser EL, Gyourko J, Saks RE. 2005.. Why have housing prices gone up?. Am. Econ. Rev. 95:(2):32933
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  59. Glaeser EL, Kahn ME, Rappaport J. 2008.. Why do the poor live in cities? The role of public transportation. . J. Urban Econ. 63:(1):124
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  60. Glaeser EL, Ward BA. 2009.. The causes and consequences of land use regulation: evidence from Greater Boston. . J. Urban Econ. 65:(3):26578
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  61. Gray MN. 2022.. Arbitrary Lines: How Zoning Broke the American City and How to Fix It. Washington, DC:: Island
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Gyourko J, Molloy R. 2014.. Regulation and housing supply. NBER Work. Pap. 20536. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w20536/w20536.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Gyourko J, Saiz A, Summers A. 2008.. A new measure of the local regulatory environment for housing markets: the Wharton Residential Land Use Regulatory Index. . Urban Stud. 45:(3):693729
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  64. Hajnal ZL, Trounstine J. 2010.. Who or what governs? The effects of economics, politics, institutions, and needs on local spending. . Am. Politics Res. 38:(6):113063
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  65. Hall AB, Yoder J. 2022.. Does homeownership influence political behavior? Evidence from administrative data. . J. Politics 84:(1):35166
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  66. Hamilton BW. 1975.. Zoning and property taxation in a system of local governments. . Urban Stud. 12:(2):20511
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  67. Hamilton BW. 1976.. Capitalization of intrajurisdictional differences in local tax prices. . Am. Econ. Rev. 66:(5):74353
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Hankinson M. 2018.. When do renters behave like homeowners? High rent, price anxiety, and NIMBYism. . Am. Political Sci. Rev. 112:(3):47393
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  69. Hankinson M, Magazinnik A. 2023.. The supply-equity trade-off: the effect of spatial representation on the local housing supply. . J. Politics 85:(3):103347
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  70. Hart JF. 1996.. Colonial land use law and its significance for modern takings doctrine. . Harvard Law Rev. 109:(6):1252300
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  71. Harwood S, Myers D. 2002.. The dynamics of immigration and local governance in Santa Ana: neighborhood activism, overcrowding, and land-use policy. . Policy Stud. J. 30:(1):7091
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  72. Hayward CR. 2013.. How Americans Make Race: Stories, Institutions, Spaces. New York:: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Helper R. 1969.. Racial Policies and Practices of Real Estate Brokers. Minneapolis:: Univ. Minn. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Hilber CA, Robert-Nicoud F. 2013.. On the origins of land use regulations: theory and evidence from US metro areas. . J. Urban Econ. 75::2943
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  75. Hills RM Jr., Schleicher DN. 2011.. Balancing the zoning budget. . Case Western Reserve Law Rev. 62::81133
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Hinds DS, Ordway N. 1986.. The influence of race on rezoning decisions: equality of treatment in black and white census tracts, 1955–1980. . Rev. Black Political Econ. 14:(4):5163
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  77. Holliday AC. 1922.. Restrictions governing city development. . Town Plan. Rev. 9:(4):21738
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  78. Hsieh CT, Moretti E. 2019.. Housing constraints and spatial misallocation. . Am. Econ. J. Macroecon. 11:(2):139
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  79. Hutchings VL, Valentino NA. 2004.. The centrality of race in American politics. . Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 7::383408
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  80. Imbroscio D. 2021.. Rethinking exclusionary zoning or: How I stopped worrying and learned to love it. . Urban Aff. Rev. 57:(1):21451
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  81. Jackson K. 2016.. Do land use regulations stifle residential development? Evidence from California cities. . J. Urban Econ. 91::4556
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  82. Jackson KT. 1987.. Crabgrass Frontier: The Suburbanization of the United States. New York:: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Keyssar A. 2000.. The Right to Vote: The Contested History of Democracy. New York:: Basic Books
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Koebel CT, Lang RE, Danielsen KA. 2004.. Community acceptance of affordable housing. Rep. , Natl. Assoc. Realtors:; Va. Tech Cent. Hous. Res. Metropol. Inst. https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/sea_fac_articles/350/
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Kruse KM, Sugrue TJ, eds. 2006.. The New Suburban History. Chicago:: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Lens MC. 2022.. Zoning, land use, and the reproduction of urban inequality. . Annu. Rev. Sociol. 48::42139
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  87. Lens MC, Monkkonen P. 2016.. Do strict land use regulations make metropolitan areas more segregated by income?. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 82:(1):621
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  88. Logan JR, Molotch H. 1987.. Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place. Berkeley:: Univ. Calif. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Lubell M, Feiock RC, De La Cruz EER. 2009.. Local institutions and the politics of urban growth. . Am. J. Political Sci. 53:(3):64965
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  90. Manville M, Monkkonen P. 2021.. Unwanted housing: localism and politics of housing development. . J. Plan. Educ. Res. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X21997903
    [Google Scholar]
  91. Manville M, Monkkonen P, Lens M. 2020.. It's time to end single-family zoning. . J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 86:(1):10612
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  92. Marble W, Nall C. 2021.. Where self-interest trumps ideology: liberal homeowners and local opposition to housing development. . J. Politics 83:(4):174763
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  93. Margo RA. 1992.. Explaining the postwar suburbanization of population in the United States: the role of income. . J. Urban Econ. 31:(3):30110
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  94. Miller GJ. 1981.. Cities by Contract: The Politics of Municipal Incorporation. Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press
    [Google Scholar]
  95. Minkoff SL. 2009.. Minding your neighborhood: the spatial context of local redistribution. . Soc. Sci. Q. 90:(3):51637
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  96. Mollenkopf JH. 1983.. The Contested City. Princeton, NJ:: Princeton Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  97. Monarrez T, Schönholzer D. 2023.. Dividing lines: racial segregation across local government boundaries. . J. Econ. Lit. 61:(3):86387
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  98. Monkkonen EH. 1990.. America Becomes Urban: The Development of US Cities and Towns, 1780–1980. Berkeley:: Univ. Calif. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  99. Monkkonen P, Manville M. 2019.. Opposition to development or opposition to developers? Experimental evidence on attitudes toward new housing. . J. Urban Aff. 41:(8):112341
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  100. Myers D, Gearin E. 2001.. Current preferences and future demand for denser residential environments. . Hous. Policy Debate 12:(4):63159
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  101. Nall C. 2018.. The Road to Inequality: How the Federal Highway Program Polarized America and Undermined Cities. New York:: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  102. Navarro P, Carson R. 1991.. Growth controls: policy analysis for the second generation. . Policy Sci. 24:(2):12752
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  103. Oates WE. 1981.. On local finance and the Tiebout model. . Am. Econ. Rev. 71:(2):9398
    [Google Scholar]
  104. Oliver JE. 2001.. Democracy in Suburbia. Princeton, NJ:: Princeton Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  105. Oliver JE, Ha SE, Callen Z. 2012.. Local Elections and the Politics of Small-Scale Democracy. Princeton, NJ:: Princeton Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  106. Ostrom V, Tiebout C, Warren R. 1961.. The organization of government in metropolitan areas. . Am. Political Sci. Rev. 55::83142
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  107. Parker CS, Towler CC. 2019.. Race and authoritarianism in American politics. . Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 22::50319
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  108. Pendall R. 1999.. Opposition to housing: NIMBY and beyond. . Urban Aff. Rev. 35:(1):11236
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  109. Pendall R. 2000.. Local land use regulation and the chain of exclusion. . J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 66:(2):12542
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  110. Perin C. 1977.. Everything in Its Place: Land Use and Social Order in America. Princeton, NJ:: Princeton Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  111. Peterson PE. 1981.. City Limits. Chicago:: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
  112. Pogodzinski JM, Sass TR. 1994.. The theory and estimation of endogenous zoning. . Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 24:(5):60130
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  113. Power G. 1983.. Apartheid Baltimore style: the residential segregation ordinances of 1910–1913. . Md. Law Rev. 42::289328
    [Google Scholar]
  114. Rappaport J. 2005.. The shared fortunes of cities and suburbs. . Econ. Rev. Fed. Reserve Bank Kansas City 90:(3):3360
    [Google Scholar]
  115. Reardon SF, Bischoff K. 2011.. Income inequality and income segregation. . Am. J. Sociol. 116:(4):1092153
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  116. Reardon SF, Yun JT, Eitle TM. 2000.. The changing structure of school segregation: measurement and evidence of multiracial metropolitan-area school segregation, 1989–1995. . Demography 37:(3):35164
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  117. Robinson CM. 1916.. City Planning: With Special Reference to the Planning of Streets and Lots. New York:: Knickerbocker
    [Google Scholar]
  118. Rodríguez-Pose A, Storper M. 2020.. Housing, urban growth and inequalities: the limits to deregulation and upzoning in reducing economic and spatial inequality. . Urban Stud. 57:(2):22348
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  119. Rothstein R. 2017.. The Color of Law: A Forgotten History of How Our Government Segregated America. New York:: Liveright
    [Google Scholar]
  120. Rothwell JT. 2011.. Racial enclaves and density zoning: the institutionalized segregation of racial minorities in the United States. . Am. Law Econ. Rev. 13:(1):290358
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  121. Rothwell JT, Massey DS. 2009.. The effect of density zoning on racial segregation in US urban areas. . Urban Aff. Rev. 44:(6):779806
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  122. Rothwell JT, Massey DS. 2010.. Density zoning and class segregation in US metropolitan areas. . Soc. Sci. Q. 91:(5):112343
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  123. Sahn A. 2021.. Racial diversity and exclusionary zoning: evidence from the great migration. Work. Pap. , Berkeley Inst. Young Am., Berkeley, CA:. https://youngamericans.berkeley.edu/2021/01/racial-diversity-and-exclusionary-zoning/
    [Google Scholar]
  124. Sahn A. 2024.. Public comment and public policy. . Am. J. Political Sci. In press
    [Google Scholar]
  125. Saiz A. 2010.. The geographic determinants of housing supply. . Q. J. Econ. 125:(3):125396
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  126. Scally CP. 2013.. The nuances of NIMBY: context and perceptions of affordable rental housing development. . Urban Aff. Rev. 49:(5):71847
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  127. Schleicher D. 2012.. City unplanning. . Yale Law J. 122::1670737
    [Google Scholar]
  128. Schneider M. 1986.. Fragmentation and the growth of local government. . Public Choice 48::25563
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  129. Schuetz J. 2009.. No renters in my suburban backyard: land use regulation and rental housing. . J. Policy Anal. Manag. 28:(2):296320
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  130. Schwab RM, Oates WE. 1991.. Community composition and the provision of local public goods: a normative analysis. . J. Public Econ. 44:(2):21737
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  131. Schwartz HL. 2010.. Housing policy is school policy: Economically integrative housing promotes academic success in Montgomery County, Maryland. Rep. , Century Found., Washington, DC:. https://tcf.org/content/report/housing-policy-school-policy-economically-integrative-housing-promotes-academic-success-montgomery-county-maryland/
    [Google Scholar]
  132. Shertzer A, Twinam T, Walsh RP. 2016.. Race, ethnicity, and discriminatory zoning. . Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 8:(3):21746
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  133. Shertzer A, Twinam T, Walsh RP. 2022.. Zoning and segregation in urban economic history. . Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 94::103652
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  134. Silver C. 1986.. Housing policy and suburbanization: an analysis of the changing quality and quantity of black housing in suburbia since 1950. . In Race, Ethnicity, and Minority Housing in the United States, ed. JA Momeni , pp. 6988. New York:: Greenwood
    [Google Scholar]
  135. Silver C. 1997.. The racial origins of zoning in American cities. . In Urban Planning and the African American Community: In the Shadows, ed. JM Thomas, M Ritzdorf , pp. 2339. Thousand Oaks, CA:: Sage
    [Google Scholar]
  136. Song J. 2021.. The effects of residential zoning in US housing markets. SSRN Work. Pap. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3996483
    [Google Scholar]
  137. Stephens-Dougan L. 2021.. The persistence of racial cues and appeals in American elections. . Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 24::30120
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  138. Stone CN. 1989.. Regime Politics: Governing Atlanta, 1946–1988. Lawrence:: Univ. Press Kansas
    [Google Scholar]
  139. Tausanovitch C, Warshaw C. 2014.. Representation in municipal government. . Am. Political Sci. Rev. 108:(3):60541
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  140. Teaford JC. 1979.. City and Suburb: The Political Fragmentation of Metropolitan America, 1850–1970. Baltimore, MD:: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  141. Teaford JC. 2008.. The American Suburb: The Basics. New York:: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
  142. Tiebout CM. 1956.. A pure theory of local expenditures. . J. Political Econ. 64:(5):41624
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  143. Tighe JR. 2012.. How race and class stereotyping shapes attitudes toward affordable housing. . Hous. Stud. 27:(7):96283
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  144. Toll SI. 1969.. Zoned American. New York:: Grossman
    [Google Scholar]
  145. Tretter EM. 2012.. Austin restricted: progressivism, zoning, private racial covenants, and the making of a segregated city. Work. Pap. , Inst. Urban Policy Res. Anal., Univ. Texas, Austin, TX:. https://hdl.handle.net/2152/21232
    [Google Scholar]
  146. Troesken W, Walsh R. 2019.. Collective action, white flight, and the origins of racial zoning laws. . J. Law Econ. Org. 35:(2):289318
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  147. Trounstine J. 2018.. Segregation by Design: Local Politics and Inequality in American Cities. Cambridge, UK:: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  148. Trounstine J. 2020.. The geography of inequality: how land use regulation produces segregation. . Am. Political Sci. Rev. 114:(2):44355
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  149. Trounstine J. 2023.. You won't be my neighbor: opposition to high density development. . Urban Aff. Rev. 59:(1):294308
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  150. Velasco G, Cohen O. 2022.. Three ways zoning can advance housing and climate justice. . Housing Matters, Mar. 2. https://housingmatters.urban.org/articles/three-ways-zoning-can-advance-housing-and-climate-justice
    [Google Scholar]
  151. Weiss MA. 1986.. Urban land developers and the origins of zoning laws: the case of Berkeley. . Berkeley Plan. J. 3:(1):725
    [Google Scholar]
  152. Whittemore AH. 2012.. Zoning Los Angeles: a brief history of four regimes. . Plan. Perspect. 27:(3):393415
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  153. Whittemore AH. 2020.. The roots of racial disparities in residential zoning practice: the case of Henrico County, Virginia, 1978–2015. . Hous. Policy Debate 30:(2):191204
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  154. Whittemore AH. 2021.. Exclusionary zoning: origins, open suburbs, and contemporary debates. . J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 87:(2):16780
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  155. Wood R. 1959.. Suburbia: Its People and the Politics. Boston:: Houghton Mifflin
    [Google Scholar]
  156. Woodbury C. 1929.. Some suggested changes in the control of urban development. . J. Land Public Utility Econ. 5:(3):24959
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  157. Woodward CV. 1955.. The Strange Career of Jim Crow. New York:: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  158. Zabel J, Dalton M. 2011.. The impact of minimum lot size regulations on house prices in Eastern Massachusetts. . Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 41:(6):57183
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  159. Zhou J, McMillen DP, McDonald JF. 2008.. Land values and the 1957 comprehensive amendment to the Chicago zoning ordinance. . Urban Stud. 45:(8):164761
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-041322-041133
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-041322-041133
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error