1932

Abstract

The term governance does not have a settled definition today, and it has at least three main meanings. The first is international cooperation through nonsovereign bodies outside the state system. This concept grew out of the literature on globalization and argued that territorial sovereignty was giving way to more informal types of horizontal cooperation, as well as to supranational bodies such as the European Union. The second meaning treated governance as a synonym for public administration, that is, effective implementation of state policy. Interest in this topic was driven by awareness that global poverty was rooted in corruption and weak state capacity. The third meaning of governance was the regulation of social behavior through networks and other nonhierarchical mechanisms. The first and third of these strands of thought downplay traditional state authority and favor new transnational or civil society actors. These trends, however, raise troubling questions about transparency and accountability in the workings of modern government.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-042214-044240
2016-05-11
2024-06-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/polisci/19/1/annurev-polisci-042214-044240.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-042214-044240&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abbott KW, Snidal D. 2000. Hard and soft law in international governance. Int. Organ. 54:3421–56 [Google Scholar]
  2. Abbott KW, Snidal D. 2010. International regulation without international government: improving IO performance through orchestration. Rev Int. Organ. 5:315–44 [Google Scholar]
  3. Acemoglu D, Robinson J. 2013. Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty New York: Crown Bus. [Google Scholar]
  4. Albardera L. 2008. Corporate social responsibility, governance and accountability. Corp. Governance 8:4430–39 [Google Scholar]
  5. Andrews M. 2013. The Limits of Institutional Reform: Changing Rules of Realistic Solutions New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  6. Bäck H, Hadenius A. 2008. Democracy and state capacity: exploring a J-shaped relationship. Governance 21:11–24 [Google Scholar]
  7. Barlow JP. 1996. A declaration of the independence of cyberspace https://projects.eff.org/∼barlow/Declaration-Final.html [Google Scholar]
  8. Barro RJ. 1996. Democracy and growth. J. Econ. Growth 1:1–27 [Google Scholar]
  9. Batley R, Larbi G. 2004. The Changing Role of Government: The Reform of Public Services in Developing Countries Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan [Google Scholar]
  10. Bell DA. 2015. The China Model: Political Meritocracy and the Limits of Democracy Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  11. Bell S, Hindmoor A. 2009. Rethinking Governance: The Centrality of the State in Modern Society. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  12. Berliner D, Greenleaf A, Lake M, Levi M, Noveck J. 2015. Labor Standards in International Supply Chains: Aligning Rights and Incentives Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar [Google Scholar]
  13. Besley T. 2006. Principled Agent? The Political Economy of Good Government New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  14. Blumkin T, Gradstein M. 2002. Transparency gloves for grabbing hands? Politics and(mis) governance Cent. Econ. Policy Res. Disc. Pap. 3668 [Google Scholar]
  15. Boston J, Martin J. 1996. Public Management: The New Zealand Model. Auckland, NZ: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  16. Burnett E, Mahon J. 2001. Monitoring compliance with international labor standards. Challenge 44:251–72 [Google Scholar]
  17. Buse K, Walt G. 2000. Global public-private partnerships: part I—a new development in health?. Bull. WHO 78:4549–61 [Google Scholar]
  18. Cashore BW. 2002. Legitimacy and the privatization of environmental governance: how non-state market-driven (NSMD) governance systems gain rule-making authority. Governance 15:4503–29 [Google Scholar]
  19. Cashore BW. 2004. Governing Through Markets: Forest Certification and the Emergence of Non-State Authority New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  20. Castells M. 1996. The Rise of the Network Society Malden, MA: Blackwell [Google Scholar]
  21. Chartier D, Deléage J-P. 1998. The international environmental NGOs: from the revolutionary to the pragmatism of reform. Environ. Polit. 7:326–41 [Google Scholar]
  22. Christman P, Taylor G. 2006. Firm self-regulation through international certifiable standards. J. Intl. Bus. Stud. 37:863–78 [Google Scholar]
  23. Coase RH. 1937. The nature of the firm. Economica 6:386–405 [Google Scholar]
  24. Coleman JS. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. Am. J. Sociol. Suppl. 94:S95–S120 [Google Scholar]
  25. Coleman JS, Campbell E, Hobson C, McPartland J, Mood A. 1966. Equality of Educational Opportunity Washington, DC: US Dep. Hous. Educ. Welf. [Google Scholar]
  26. Dahlberg S, Holmberg S. 2014. Democracy and bureaucracy: how their quality matters for popular satisfaction. West Eur. Polit. 37:3515–37 [Google Scholar]
  27. Davidow WH, Malone MS. 1992. The Virtual Corporation: Structuring and Revitalizing the Corporation for the 21st Century New York: HarperCollins [Google Scholar]
  28. Dent M, Chandler J. et al. 2004. Questioning the New Public Management Aldershot, UK: Ashgate [Google Scholar]
  29. Dibben P, Wood G, Roper I. 2004. Contesting Public Sector Reforms: Critical Perspectives, International Debates Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan [Google Scholar]
  30. DiIulio JJ Jr. 1994. Principled agents: the cultural bases of behavior in a federal government bureaucracy. J. Public Admin. Res. Theory 4:3277–320 [Google Scholar]
  31. DiIulio JJ Jr. 2014. Bring Back the Bureaucrats: Why More Federal Workers Will Lead to Better (and Smaller!) Government Conshohocken, PA: Templeton [Google Scholar]
  32. DiMaggio P, Hargittai E, Neuman W. 2001. Social implications of the internet. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 27:307–36 [Google Scholar]
  33. Drahos P, Braithwaite J. 2001. Global Business Regulation Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  34. Druckman JN, Lupia A. 2016. Preference change in competitive political environments. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 19:In press [Google Scholar]
  35. Dunleavy P, Margetts H, Bastow S, Tinkler J. 2006. New public management is dead: long live digital-era governance. J. Public Admin. Res. Theory 16:3467–94 [Google Scholar]
  36. Dunn WN, Miller DY. 2007. A critique of the new public management and the neo-Weberian state: advancing a critical theory of administrative reform. Public Organ. Rev. 7:345–58 [Google Scholar]
  37. Etter L. 2014. Can transparency reduce corruption? Evidence from firms in Peru and Mali on the impact of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) on corruption. Presented at Doing Business Res. Conf., Georgetown Univ., Washington, DC, Feb. 20–21 [Google Scholar]
  38. Evans PB, Skocpol T, Rueschemeyer D. 1985. Bringing the State Back In Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  39. Florini AM. 2000. The Third Force: The Rise of Transnational Civil Society Washington, DC: Carnegie Endow. [Google Scholar]
  40. Freeman J. 2000. The private role in public governance. N. Y. Univ. Law Rev. 75:543–675 [Google Scholar]
  41. Friedman M. 1962. Capitalism and Freedom Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  42. Friedman T. 1999. The Lexus and the Olive Tree New York: Farrar Straus Giroux [Google Scholar]
  43. Fukuyama F. 2013. What is governance?. Governance 26:3347–68 [Google Scholar]
  44. Fukuyama F. 2014. Political Order and Political Decay: From the Industrial Revolution to the Globalization of Democracy New York: Farrar Straus Giroux [Google Scholar]
  45. Gellner E. 1994. Conditions of Liberty: Civil Society and Its Rivals London: Hamish Hamilton [Google Scholar]
  46. Gingerich DW. 2013. Governance indicators and the level of analysis problem: empirical findings from South America. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 43:3505–40 [Google Scholar]
  47. Glennerster R, Shin Y. 2003. Is transparency good for you, and can the IMF help? Intl. Monet. Fund Work. Pap. No. 03/132 [Google Scholar]
  48. Goldstein J, Kahler M, Keohane R, Slaughter AM. 2000. Legalization and world politics. World Polit. 54:3385–99 [Google Scholar]
  49. Gruber L. 2000. Ruling the World: Power Politics and the Rise of Supranational Institutions Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  50. Halpern M, Mehrotra AK. 2000. From international treaties to internet norms: the evolution of international trademark disputes. Univ. Pa. J. Intl. Econ. L. 21:3523–61 [Google Scholar]
  51. Haque MS. 2001. The diminishing publicness of public service under the current mode of governance. Public Admin. Rev. 61:165–82 [Google Scholar]
  52. Haque MS. 2007. Revisiting the new public management. Public Admin. Rev. 67:1179–82 [Google Scholar]
  53. Haufler V. 2001. A Public Role for the Private Sector: Industry Self-Regulation in a Global Economy Washington, DC: Carnegie Endow. Intl. Peace [Google Scholar]
  54. Held D, Pitts C. 2011. Handbook of Transnational Governance: Institutions and Innovations Cambridge, UK: Polity [Google Scholar]
  55. Héritier A, Lehmkuhl D. 2008. The shadow of hierarchy and new modes of governance. J. Public Policy 28:11–17 [Google Scholar]
  56. Hill CJ, Lynn LE Jr. 2004. Is hierarchical governance in decline? Evidence from empirical research. J. Public Admin. Res. Theory 15:2173–95 [Google Scholar]
  57. Hirschman AO. 1970. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  58. Ho DE, Quinn KM. 2009. The role of theory and evidence in media regulation and law: response to Baker and a defense of empirical legal studies. Fed. Commun. Law J. 61:673–713 [Google Scholar]
  59. Hood C. 1991. A public management for all seasons?. Public Admin. 69:3–19 [Google Scholar]
  60. Hood C. 1995. The “new public management” in the 1980s: variations on a theme. Account. Organ. Soc. 20:2/393–109 [Google Scholar]
  61. Hood C. 2001. New public management. International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavorial Sciences N Smelser, B Baltes 12 Amsterdam: Elsevier [Google Scholar]
  62. Hood C, Peters G. 2004. The middle aging of new public management: into the age of paradox?. J. Public Admin. Res. Theory 14:3267–82 [Google Scholar]
  63. Howlett M, Ramesh M. 2014. The two orders of governance failure: design mismatches and policy capacity issues in modern governance. Policy Soc. 33:317–27 [Google Scholar]
  64. Islam R. 2006. Does transparency go along with better governance?. Econ. Polit. 18:2121–67 [Google Scholar]
  65. Jordan A, Wurzel R, Zito A. 2005. The rise of “new” policy instruments in comparative perspective: Has governance eclipsed government?. Polit. Stud. 53:477–96 [Google Scholar]
  66. Kahler M, Lake DA. 2003. Governance in a Global Economy: Political Authority in Transition Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  67. Kaufman H. 1960. The Forest Ranger: A Study in Administrative Behavior Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  68. Kaufmann D, Bellver A. 2005. Transparenting transparency: initial empirics and policy applications Presentation to Intl. Monet. Fund, Washington, DC [Google Scholar]
  69. Kaufmann D, Kraay A, Mastruzzi M. 1999. Governance Matters Washington, DC: World Bank Inst. [Google Scholar]
  70. Keck ME, Sikkink K. 1998. Activitists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  71. Kettl DF. 2002. The Transformation of Governance: Public Administration for Twenty-First Century America Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  72. Knill C, Lehmkuhl D. 2002. Private actors and the state: internationalization and changing patterns of governance. Governance 15:141–63 [Google Scholar]
  73. Kolstad I, Wiig A. 2009. Is transparency the key to reducing corruption in resource-rich countries?. World Dev. 37:3521–32 [Google Scholar]
  74. Kooiman J. 2003. Governing as Governance Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage [Google Scholar]
  75. Krasner, Stephen D. 1999. Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  76. Lake DA. 2010. Rightful rules: authority, order, and the foundations of global governance. Intl. Stud. Q. 54:3587–613 [Google Scholar]
  77. Lane J-E. 1987. Bureaucracy and Public Choice Beverly Hills, CA: Sage [Google Scholar]
  78. Licha I. 2004. Citizens in Charge: Managing Local Budgets in East Asia and Latin America Washington, DC: Inter-Am. Dev. Bank [Google Scholar]
  79. Locke RM. 2013. The Promise and Limits of Private Power: Promoting Labor Standards in a Global Economy Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  80. Lodge M, Gill D. 2011. Toward a new era of administrative reform? The myth of post-NPM New Zealand. Governance 24:1141–66 [Google Scholar]
  81. Lynn LE Jr. 1998. A critical analysis of the new public management. Intl. Public Manag. J. 1:1107–23 [Google Scholar]
  82. Magaloni B, Kricheli R. 2010. Political order and one-party rule. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 13:123–43 [Google Scholar]
  83. Mallaby S. 2004. The World's Banker: A Story of Failed States, Financial Crises, & the Wealth and Poverty of Nations New York: Penguin [Google Scholar]
  84. Malone TW, Yates J. 1987. Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies. Commun. ACM 30:6484–97 [Google Scholar]
  85. Mauro P. 2002. The persistence of corruption and slow economic growth Intl. Monet. Fund Work. Pap. No. 02/213 [Google Scholar]
  86. Mazur J. 2000. Labor's new internationalism. Foreign Aff. 79:179–93 [Google Scholar]
  87. Meidinger E, Elliott C, Oesten G. 2003. Social and political dimensions of forest certification Buffalo Legal Stud. Res. Pap. Ser. No. 2015-007 [Google Scholar]
  88. Mettler S. 2011. The Submerged State: How Invisible Government Policies Undermine American Democracy Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  89. Milgrom P, Holmstrom B. 1991. Multitask principal-agent analyses: incentive contracts, asset ownership, and job design. J. Law Econ. Organ. 7:24–52 [Google Scholar]
  90. Milgrom P, Roberts J. 1992. Economics, Organization, and Management Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall [Google Scholar]
  91. Møller J, Skaaning S-E. 2014. The state-democracy nexus: conceptual distinctions, theoretical perspectives, and comparative approaches. Democratization 21:71203–20 [Google Scholar]
  92. Nickson A. 1999. Does the NPM work in less developed countries? The case of urban water supply. J. Intl. Dev. 11:5777–83 [Google Scholar]
  93. North DC. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  94. North DC, Weingast BR, Wallis J. 2009. Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  95. O'Connell AJ. 2011. Agency rulemaking and political transitions. Northwest. Univ. Law Rev. 105:2471–534 [Google Scholar]
  96. O'Connell AJ. 2015. Shortening agency and judicial vacancies through filibuster reform? An examination of confirmation rates and delays from 1981–2014. Duke Law J. 64:81645–715 [Google Scholar]
  97. OECD 2005. Modernising Government: The Way Forward Paris: OECD [Google Scholar]
  98. Offe C. 2009. Governance: an “empty signifier”?. Constellations 16:4550–62 [Google Scholar]
  99. Padgett JF, Powell WW. 2012. The Emergence of Organizations and Markets Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  100. Peisakhin L, Pinto P. 2010. Is transparency an effective anti-corruption strategy? Evidence from a field experiment in India. Regul. Gov. 4:3261–80 [Google Scholar]
  101. Peters BG, Pierre J. 1998. Governance without government? Rethinking public administration. J. Public Admin. Res. Theory 2:223–43 [Google Scholar]
  102. Plattner MF. 2013. Reflections on ‘governance’. J. Democracy 24:417–28 [Google Scholar]
  103. Pollitt C. 1993. Managerialism and the Public Services Oxford, UK: Blackwell [Google Scholar]
  104. Pollitt C, Boukaert G. 2000. Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  105. Powell WW. 1987. Hybrid organizational arrangements. Calif. Manage. Rev. 30:67–87 [Google Scholar]
  106. Przeworski A, Alvarez M, Cheibub J, Limongi F. 2000. Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Material Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  107. Putnam RD. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  108. Putnam RD. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community New York: Simon & Schuster [Google Scholar]
  109. Radford G. 2013. The Rise of the Public Authority: Statebuilding and Economic Development in Twentieth-Century America Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  110. Reinikka R, Svensson J. 2004. Local capture: evidence from a central government transfer program in Uganda. Q. J. Econ. 119:21–28 [Google Scholar]
  111. Rhodes RAW. 1996. The new governance: governing without government. Polit. Stud. 44:652–67 [Google Scholar]
  112. Rhodes RAW. 1997. Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability Buckingham, UK: Open Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  113. Risse T, Börzel TA. 2010. Governance without a state: Can it work?. Regul. Governance 4:113–34 [Google Scholar]
  114. Roht-Arriaza N. 1995. Shifting the point of regulation: the international organization for standardization and global law. Ecol. Law Q. 22:479–539 [Google Scholar]
  115. Ronfeldt D, Thorup CL. 1993. North America in the Era of Citizen Networks: State, Society, and Security Santa Monica, CA: RAND [Google Scholar]
  116. Rose-Ackerman S, Truex R. 2012. Corruption and policy reform Work. pap., Copenhagen Consensus [Google Scholar]
  117. Rosenau JN, Czempiel E-O. 1992. Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  118. Rotberg RI. 2015. On Governance: What It Is, What It Measures and Its Policy Uses Waterloo, ON: Cent. Intl. Governance Innovations [Google Scholar]
  119. Rothstein B, Holmberg S. 2011. The Quality of Government: Corruption, Social Trust, and Inequality in International Perspective Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  120. Sabel C, Zeitlin J. 2008. Learning from difference: the new architecture of experimentalist governance in the EU. Eur. Law J. 14:3271–327 [Google Scholar]
  121. Schick A. 1998. Why most developing countries should not try New Zealand reforms. World Bank Res. Obs. 13:81123–31 [Google Scholar]
  122. Selznick P. 1951. TVA and the Grass Roots: A Study in the Sociology of Formal Organizations New York: McGraw-Hill [Google Scholar]
  123. Shefter M. 1993. Political Parties and the State: The American Historical Experience Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  124. Simon H. 1957. Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization New York: Free Press [Google Scholar]
  125. Singer PW. 2007. Corporate Warriors: The Rise of the Privatized Military Industry Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  126. Slaughter A-M. 2004. A New World Order Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  127. Smith J, Chatfield C, Pagnucco R. 1997. Transnational Social Movements and Global Politics: Solidarity Beyond the State Syracuse, NY: Syracuse Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  128. Smith SR, Lipsky M. 1993. Nonprofits for Hire: The Welfare State in the Age of Contracting Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  129. Spiro PJ. 1998. New players on the international stage. Hofstra Law Policy Symp. 2:25–32 [Google Scholar]
  130. Steurer R. 2010. The role of government in corporate social responsibility: characterizing public policies on CSR in Europe. Policy Sci. 43:49–72 [Google Scholar]
  131. Steurer R. 2013. Disentangling governance: a synoptic view of regulation by government, business and civil society. Policy Sci. 46:387–410 [Google Scholar]
  132. Thomas M. 2010. What do the worldwide governance indicators measure?. Eur. J. Dev. Res. 22:131–54 [Google Scholar]
  133. Thompson G. 2003. Between Hierarchies and Networks: The Logic and Limits of Network Forms of Organzation New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  134. Tocqueville A de. 2000 (1840). Democracy in America Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  135. Trebilcock MJ, Kirton JJ. 2008. Hard choices, soft law: voluntary standards in global trade, environment and social governance. Intl. Env. Agreements 8:4413–15 [Google Scholar]
  136. Verkuil PR. 2007. Outsourcing Sovereignty: Why Privatization of Government Functions Threatens Democracy and What We Can Do About It New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  137. Waldrop MM. 1992. Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos New York: Simon & Schuster [Google Scholar]
  138. Wallace H, Wallace W. 2000. Policy-Making in the European Union Oxford/New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  139. Wapner P. 1994. Environmental activism and global civil society. Dissent 41:389–93 [Google Scholar]
  140. Williamson J. 1994. The Political Economy of Policy Reform Washington, DC: Inst. Intl. Econ. [Google Scholar]
  141. Williamson OE. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism New York: Free Press [Google Scholar]
  142. Williamson OE. 1990. Organization Theory from Chester Barnard to the Present New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  143. World Bank 1992. Governance and Development Washington, DC: World Bank [Google Scholar]
  144. World Bank 1997. The State in a Changing World Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  145. World Bank 2004. World Development Report 2004: Making Services Work for Poor People Washington, DC: World Bank [Google Scholar]
  146. Wriston WB. 1992. The Twilight of Sovereignty New York: Charles Scribner's Sons [Google Scholar]
  147. Yang D. 2008. Can enforcement backfire? Crime displacement in the context of customs reform in the Philippines. Rev. Econ. Stat. 90:11–14 [Google Scholar]
  148. Yilmaz Y. 1998. Private regulation: a real alternative for regulatory reform CATO Policy Analysis No. 303, Washington, DC [Google Scholar]
  149. Young OR. 1997. Global Governance: Drawing Insights from the Environmental Experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-042214-044240
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error