1932

Abstract

This article assesses recent normative theorizing on militant democracy—the idea that, to protect themselves, democracies might under some circumstances have to restrict the rights of those set on undermining or outright destroying democracy. Particular attention is paid to new justifications of militant democracy that seek to avoid the danger of militant democracy itself damaging democracy, as well as to the question of who the agent deciding on implementing militant democracy ought to be. Three new challenges for thinking about militant democracy are identified: certain forms of religious belief and practice, new varieties of authoritarianism that include elections and some limited freedoms, and the question of whether international and supranational institutions can play a role in protecting democracies.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-043014-124054
2016-05-11
2024-04-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/polisci/19/1/annurev-polisci-043014-124054.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-043014-124054&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Bale T. 2007. Are bans on political parties bound to turn out badly? A comparative investigation of three “intolerant” democracies: Turkey, Spain, and Belgium. Comp. Eur. Polit. 5:141–57 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bleich E. 2011. The Freedom to Be Racist? How the United States and Europe Struggle to Preserve Freedom and Combat Racism New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  3. Bowen J. 2011. How the French state justifies controlling Muslim bodies. Soc. Res. 78:2325–48 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bracher KD. 1984. The Age of Ideologies: A History of Political Thought in the Twentieth Century New York: St. Martin's Press
  5. Brancati D. 2014. Democratic authoritarianism: origins and effects. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 17:313–26 [Google Scholar]
  6. Brettschneider C. 2012. When the State Speaks, What Should It Say? Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  7. Capoccia G. 2013. Militant democracy: the institutional bases of democratic self-preservation. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 9:207–26 [Google Scholar]
  8. Dobson J. 2012. The Dictator's Learning Curve: Inside the Global Battle for Democracy New York: Doubleday
  9. Dworkin R. 2006. The right to ridicule. New York Review of Books, March 23. http://www.nybooks.com/articles/2006/03/23/the-right-to-ridicule/ [last accessed 18 January 2016] [Google Scholar]
  10. Flümann G. 2015. Streitbare Demokratie in Deutschland und den Vereinigten Staaten: Der staatliche Umgang mit nichtgewalttätigem politischem Extremismus im Vergleich Wiesbaden, Ger.: Springer VS
  11. Forsdyke S. 2005. Exile, Ostracism, and Democracy: The Politics of Expulsion in Ancient Greece Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  12. Franck T. 1992. The emerging right to democratic governance. Am. J. Int. Law 86:146–91 [Google Scholar]
  13. Frankenberg G. 2003. The learning sovereign. Militant Democracy A Sajó, pp. 113–32. Utrecht Neth.: Eleven [Google Scholar]
  14. Halperin MH, Lomasney K. 1993. Toward a global “guarantee clause.”. J. Democr. 4:360–69 [Google Scholar]
  15. Issacharoff S. 2007. Fragile democracies. Harvard Law Rev. 120:61405–67 [Google Scholar]
  16. Kirshner A. 2014. A Theory of Militant Democracy New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  17. Kelsen H. 1932. Verteidigung der Demokratie. Demokratie und Sozialismus N Leser , pp. 60–68 Vienna: Wiener Volksbuchhandlung [Google Scholar]
  18. Landau D. 2012. Abusive constitutionalism. UC Davis Law Rev. 47:189–260 [Google Scholar]
  19. Lefort C. 1988. Democracy and Political Theory Cambridge, UK: Polity
  20. Levitsky S, Way LA. 2010. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes After the Cold War. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  21. Loewenstein K. 1937a. Militant democracy and fundamental rights I. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 31:417–32 [Google Scholar]
  22. Loewenstein K. 1937b. Militant democracy and fundamental rights II. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 31:638–58 [Google Scholar]
  23. Macklem P. 2012. Guarding the perimeter: militant democracy and religious freedom in Europe. Constellations 19:4575–90 [Google Scholar]
  24. Meier H. 2014. Wozu eigentlich noch Verfassungsschutz?. Merkur 68:297–109 [Google Scholar]
  25. Moyn S. 2014. From Communist to Muslim: European human rights, the Cold War, and religious liberty. South Atl. Q. 113:163–86 [Google Scholar]
  26. Müller J-W. 2011. Contesting Democracy: Political Ideas in Twentieth-Century Europe. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  27. Müller J-W. 2012. Militant democracy. Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law M Rosenfeld, A Sajó 1253–69 New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  28. Müller J-W. 2015. Should the EU protect democracy and the rule of law inside member states?. Eur. Law J. 21:2141–60 [Google Scholar]
  29. Niesen P. 2003. Anti-extremism, negative republicanism, civic society: three paradigms for banning political parties. Europe's Century of Discontent: The Legacies of Fascism, Nazism, and Communism S Avineri, Z Sternhell 249–68 Jerusalem: Magnes Press [Google Scholar]
  30. Niesen P. 2012. Banning the former ruling party. Constellations 19:4540–61 [Google Scholar]
  31. Post R. 1991. Racist speech, democracy, and the First Amendment. William Mary Law Rev. 32:2267–327 [Google Scholar]
  32. Post R. 2006. Religion and freedom of speech: portraits of Muhammad. Constellations 14:172–90 [Google Scholar]
  33. Przeworski A. 1991. Democracy and the Market New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  34. Quong J. 2004. The rights of unreasonable citizens. J. Polit. Philos. 12:3314–35 [Google Scholar]
  35. Rawls J. 1971. A Theory of Justice Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  36. Rawls J. 1993. Political Liberalism New York: Columbia Univ. Press
  37. Rensmann T. 2003. Procedural fairness in a militant democracy: The “uprising of the decent” fails before the Federal Constitutional Court. Ger. Law J. 4:1117–36 [Google Scholar]
  38. Rosenblum N. 2008. On the Side of the Angels: An Appreciation of Parties and Partisanship Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  39. Rummens S, Abts K. 2010. Defending democracy: the concentric containment of political extremism. Polit. Stud. 58:649–65 [Google Scholar]
  40. Runciman D. 2013. The Confidence Trap Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  41. Sajó A. 2006. From militant democracy to the preventive state?. Cardozo Law Rev. 27:2255–95 [Google Scholar]
  42. Saward M. 2006. The representative claim. Contemp. Polit. Theory 5:297–318 [Google Scholar]
  43. Scottiaux S, Rummens S. 2012. Concentric democracy: resolving the incoherence in the European Court of Human Rights case law on freedom of expression and freedom of association. Int. J. Const. Law 10:106–26 [Google Scholar]
  44. Simonin A. 2008. Le déshonneur dans la République: une histoire de l'indignité, 1791–1958 Paris: Grasset
  45. Staden AV. 2012. Democratic legitimacy of judicial review beyond the state: normative subsidiarity and judicial standards of review. Int. J. Const. Law 10:41023–49 [Google Scholar]
  46. Teitel R. 2007. Militant democracy: comparative constitutional perspectives. Mich. J. Int. Law 29:49–70 [Google Scholar]
  47. Thiel M. 2009. The “Militant Democracy” Principle in Modern Democracies Farnham: Ashgate
  48. Tyulkina S. 2015. Militant Democracy: Undemocratic Political Parties and Beyond New York: Routledge
  49. Venice Comm. (Eur. Comm. Democr. Law) 2000. Guidelines on Prohibition and Dissolution of Political Parties and Analogous Measures Counc. Eur., Strasbourg, Fr. http://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-INF(2000)001-e
  50. Waldron J. 1993. A right to do wrong. Liberal Rights: Collected Papers 1981–199163–87 New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-043014-124054
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error