1932

Abstract

Populism is the name of a global phenomenon whose definitional precariousness is proverbial. It resists generalizations and makes scholars of politics comparativist by necessity, as its language and content are imbued with the political culture of the society in which it arises. A rich body of socio-historical analyses allows us to situate populism within the global phenomenon called democracy, as its ideological core is nourished by the two main entities—the nation and the people—that have fleshed out popular sovereignty in the age of democratization. Populism consists in a transmutation of the democratic principles of the majority and the people in a way that is meant to celebrate one subset of the people as opposed to another, through a leader embodying it and an audience legitimizing it. This may make populism collide with constitutional democracy, even if its main tenets are embedded in the democratic universe of meanings and language. In this article, I illustrate the context-based character of populism and how its cyclical appearances reflect the forms of representative government. I review the main contemporary interpretations of the concept and argue that some basic agreement now exists on populism's rhetorical character and its strategy for achieving power in democratic societies. Finally, I sketch the main characteristics of populism in power and explain how it tends to transform the fundamentals of democracy: the people and the majority, elections, and representation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050317-070753
2019-05-11
2024-04-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/polisci/22/1/annurev-polisci-050317-070753.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050317-070753&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Anderson P 2017. The H-Word: The Periphery of Hegemony London: Verso
  2. Arato A 2013. Political theology and populism. Soc. Res. 80:1143–72
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Arato A 2017. How we got here: transition failures, their causes, and the populist interest in the constitution. Oct. 11. Public Sem http://www.publicseminar.org/2017/10/how-we-got-here/. Accessed Jan. 2018
  4. Arditi B 2007. Politics on the Edges of Liberalism: Difference, Populism, Revolution, Agitation Edinburgh: Edinburgh Univ. Press
  5. Berlin I 1968. To define populism. Gov. Opposition 3:2137–79
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Berlin I 1999. The Roots of Romanticism H Hardy Princeton/Oxford: Princeton Univ. Press
  7. Bobbio N 1987. The Future of Democracy Transl. R Griffin Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press. From Italian
  8. Canovan M 1981. Populism New York/London: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich
  9. Canovan M 1999. “Trust the people!” Populism and the two faces of democracy. Political Stud 47:2–16
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Canovan M 2002. Taking politics to the people: populism as the ideology of democracy. Democracies and the Populist Challenge Y Mény, Y Surel 25–44 Oxford, UK: Palgrave
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Canovan M 2005. The People Cambridge, UK: Polity
  12. De la Torre C 2010. Populist Seduction in Latin America Athens: Ohio State Univ. Press
  13. D'Eramo M 2013. Populism and the new oligarchy. Transl. G Elliott. New Left Rev. 82:5–28 From Italian
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Derrida J 1988. Limited Inc Transl. S Weber Evanston, IL: Northwestern Univ. Press. From French
  15. Di Tella T 1970. Populism and reform in Latin America. Obstacles to Change in Latin America C Véliz 47–73 London: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Errejón I, Mouffe C 2016. Podemos in the Name of the People London: Lawrence & Wishrat
  17. Espejo PO 2017. Populism and the people. Theory Events 20:192–99
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Finchelstein F 2017. From Fascism to Populism in History Oakland: Univ. Calif. Press
  19. Finchelstein F, Urbinati N 2018. On populism and democracy. Populism 1:11–24
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Frank J 2010. Constituent Moments: Enacting the People in Postrevolutionary America Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
  21. Germani G 1978. Authoritarianism, Fascism, and National Populism New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books
  22. Griffin R 1996. The “post-fascism” of Alleanza Nazionale: a case study in ideological morphology. J. Political Ideologies 1:2123–45
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hofstadter R 1956. The Age of Reform New York: Knopf
  24. Kazin M 1995. The Populist Passion: An American History New York: Basic Books
  25. Kelsen H 1999. 1945. General Theory of Law and State. Transl. A Wedberg Union, NJ: Lawbook Exchange. From German
  26. Kelsen H 2013. 1929. The Essence and Value of Democracy. Transl. B Graf, ed. N Urbinati, C Invernizzi Accetti Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. From German
  27. Knight A 1999. Populism and neo-populism in Latin America, especially Mexico. J. Latin Am. Stud. 30:223–48
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Ionescu G, Gellner E 1969. Populism London: Macmillan
  29. Laclau E 2005a. On Populist Reason London: Verso
  30. Laclau E 2005b. Populism: what's in a name. Populism and the Mirror of Democracy F Panizza 32–49 London: Verso
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Laclau E 2011. Politics and Ideology in Marxist Theory: Capitalism, Fascism, Populism London: Verso
  32. Laclau E, Mouffe C 2001. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy London: Verso
  33. Levitsky S, Loxton J 2013. Populism and comparative authoritarianism: the case of Fujimori's Peru. See Mudde & Kaltwasser 2013b.160–81
  34. Macpherson CB 1953. Democracy in Alberta: The Theory and Practice of a Quasi-Party System Toronto: Univ. Toronto Press
  35. Mair P 2002. Populist democracy versus party democracy. See Mény & Surel 2002 81–98
  36. Manin B 1997. The Principles of Representative Government Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  37. Mazzoleni G 2008. Populism and the media. Twenty-First Century Populism: The Spectre of Western European Democracy D Albertazzi, D McDonnell 49–64 London/New York: Palgrave Macmillan
    [Google Scholar]
  38. McCormick JP 2011. Machiavellian Democracy Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  39. Mény Y, Surel Y 2002. Democracies and the Populist Challenge New York: Palgrave Macmillan
  40. Mills CW 1956. The Power of Elite Oxford/London: Oxford Univ. Press
  41. Moffitt B 2016. The Global Rise of Populism: Performance, Political Style, and Representation Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
  42. Morozov E 2011. The Dark Side of Internet Freedom: The New Delusion New York: Public Affairs
  43. Mouffe C 2005. The ‘end of politics’ and the challenge of right-wing populism. Populism and the Mirror of Democracy F Panizza 50–71 London: Verso
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Mouffe C 2016. The populist moment. Nov. 21 OpenDemocracy.net https://www.opendemocracy.net/democraciaabierta/chantal-mouffe/populist-challenge. Accessed May 2017
  45. Mounk Y 2018. The People versus Democracy: Why Our Freedom Is in Danger and How to Save It Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  46. Mudde C 2004. The populist zeitgeist. Gov. Opposition 39:3541–63
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Mudde C 2017. Populism: an ideational approach. The Oxford Handbook of Populism CR Kaltwasser, P Taggart, PO Espejo, P Ostiguy 28–54 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Mudde C, Kaltwasser CR 2013a. Populism and (liberal) democracy: a framework for analysis. See Mudde & Kaltwasser 2013b 205–22
  49. Mudde C, Kaltwasser CR 2013b. Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or Corrective for Democracy? Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Müller J-W 2012. Towards a political theory of populism. Notizie Politeia 107:19–29
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Müller J-W 2016. What Is Populism? Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press
  52. Murillo MV 2018. La historicidad del pueblo y los límites del populismo. Nueva Sociedad Marzo–Abril:165–74
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Norris P 1997. Passages to Power: Legislative Recruitment in Advanced Democracies Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  54. O'Donnell G 1994. Delegative democracy. J. Democracy 5:55–69
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Peruzzotti E 2013. Populism in democratic times: populism, representative democracy and the debate on democratic deepening. Latin American Populism in the Twenty-First Century C De la Torre, CJ Arnson 61–84 Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Polin R 1977. La liberté de notre temps. Paris: Vrin
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Przeworski A 1999. Minimalist conception of democracy: a defense. Democracy's Value I Shapiro, C Hacker-Cordón 23–55 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Riker WR 1982. Liberalism against Populism: A Confrontation Between the Theory of Democracy and the Theory of Social Choice Long Grove, IL: Waveland
  59. Roberts KM 2013. Populism and democracy in Venezuela under Hugo Chávez. See Mudde & Kaltwasser 2013b 136–59
  60. Roberts KM 2015. Populism, political mobilization, and crisis of political representation. The Promise and Perils of Populism: Global Perspectives C De la Torre 140–58 Lexington: Univ. Press Kentucky
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Rosanvallon P 2006. La contre-democratie. La politique a l'age de la defiance Paris: Seuil
  62. Rosenblum N 2008. On the Side of the Angels: An Appreciation of Parties and Partisanship. Princeton NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  63. Saffon MP, González-Bertomeu JF 2017. Latin American populism: an admissible trade-off between procedural democracy and equality?. Constellations 24:416–31
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Schmitt C 2008 (1928). Constitutional Theory. J Seitzer Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press. From German
  65. Shils E 1956. The Torment of Secrecy Glencoe, IL: Free Press
  66. Skocpol T, Williamson V 2012. The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  67. Taggart P 2000. Populism London: Open Univ. Press
  68. Taguieff P-A 1997. Populism and political science: from conceptual illusions to real problems. Vingtième Siècle Rev. Hist. 56:44–33
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Tarchi M 2015. Italia populista. Dal qualunquismo a Beppe Grillo Bologna: Il Mulino
  70. Traverso E 2017. Les nouveaux visages du fascisme Paris: Textuel
  71. Urbinati N 1998. Democracy and populism. Constellations 5:1110–24
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Urbinati N 2014. Democracy Disfigured: Opinion, Truth and the People Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  73. Urbinati N 2015. A revolt against intermediary bodies. Constellations 22:4477–86
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Urbinati N 2017. Populism and the principle of majority. The Oxford Handbook of Populism CR Kaltwasser, P Taggart, PO Espejo, P Ostiguy 571–89 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Walicki A 1969. Russia. Populism G Ionescu, E Gellner 62–96 London: Macmillan
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Weyland K 2001. Clarifying a contested concept: populism in the study of Latin American politics. Comp. Politics 24:11–22
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Weyland K 2013. The threat from the populist left. J. Democracy 24:118–32
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050317-070753
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error