1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Political Science
  4. Volume 22, 2019
  5. Article

Annual Review of Political Science

Volume 22, 2019

Political Theory of Populism

Abstract

Populism is the name of a global phenomenon whose definitional precariousness is proverbial. It resists generalizations and makes scholars of politics comparativist by necessity, as its language and content are imbued with the political culture of the society in which it arises. A rich body of socio-historical analyses allows us to situate populism within the global phenomenon called democracy, as its ideological core is nourished by the two main entities—the nation and the people—that have fleshed out popular sovereignty in the age of democratization. Populism consists in a transmutation of the democratic principles of the majority and the people in a way that is meant to celebrate one subset of the people as opposed to another, through a leader embodying it and an audience legitimizing it. This may make populism collide with constitutional democracy, even if its main tenets are embedded in the democratic universe of meanings and language. In this article, I illustrate the context-based character of populism and how its cyclical appearances reflect the forms of representative government. I review the main contemporary interpretations of the concept and argue that some basic agreement now exists on populism's rhetorical character and its strategy for achieving power in democratic societies. Finally, I sketch the main characteristics of populism in power and explain how it tends to transform the fundamentals of democracy: the people and the majority, elections, and representation.

Keyword(s): audience, direct representation, fascism, majority principle, populist democracy, representative democracy
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050317-070753
2019-05-11
2024-12-05
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/polisci/22/1/annurev-polisci-050317-070753.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050317-070753&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Anderson P 2017. The H-Word: The Periphery of Hegemony London: Verso
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Arato A 2013. Political theology and populism. Soc. Res. 80:1143–72
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Arato A 2017. How we got here: transition failures, their causes, and the populist interest in the constitution. Oct. 11. Public Sem http://www.publicseminar.org/2017/10/how-we-got-here/. Accessed Jan. 2018
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Arditi B 2007. Politics on the Edges of Liberalism: Difference, Populism, Revolution, Agitation Edinburgh: Edinburgh Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Berlin I 1968. To define populism. Gov. Opposition 3:2137–79
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Berlin I 1999. The Roots of Romanticism H Hardy Princeton/Oxford: Princeton Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bobbio N 1987. The Future of Democracy Transl. R Griffin Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press. From Italian
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Canovan M 1981. Populism New York/London: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Canovan M 1999. “Trust the people!” Populism and the two faces of democracy. Political Stud 47:2–16
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Canovan M 2002. Taking politics to the people: populism as the ideology of democracy. Democracies and the Populist Challenge Y Mény, Y Surel 25–44 Oxford, UK: Palgrave
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Canovan M 2005. The People Cambridge, UK: Polity
     [Google Scholar]
  12. De la Torre C 2010. Populist Seduction in Latin America Athens: Ohio State Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  13. D'Eramo M 2013. Populism and the new oligarchy. Transl. G Elliott. New Left Rev. 82:5–28 From Italian
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Derrida J 1988. Limited Inc Transl. S Weber Evanston, IL: Northwestern Univ. Press. From French
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Di Tella T 1970. Populism and reform in Latin America. Obstacles to Change in Latin America C Véliz 47–73 London: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Errejón I, Mouffe C 2016. Podemos in the Name of the People London: Lawrence & Wishrat
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Espejo PO 2017. Populism and the people. Theory Events 20:192–99
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Finchelstein F 2017. From Fascism to Populism in History Oakland: Univ. Calif. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Finchelstein F, Urbinati N 2018. On populism and democracy. Populism 1:11–24
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Frank J 2010. Constituent Moments: Enacting the People in Postrevolutionary America Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Germani G 1978. Authoritarianism, Fascism, and National Populism New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Griffin R 1996. The “post-fascism” of Alleanza Nazionale: a case study in ideological morphology. J. Political Ideologies 1:2123–45
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Hofstadter R 1956. The Age of Reform New York: Knopf
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Kazin M 1995. The Populist Passion: An American History New York: Basic Books
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Kelsen H 1999. 1945. General Theory of Law and State. Transl. A Wedberg Union, NJ: Lawbook Exchange. From German
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Kelsen H 2013. 1929. The Essence and Value of Democracy. Transl. B Graf, ed. N Urbinati, C Invernizzi Accetti Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. From German
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Knight A 1999. Populism and neo-populism in Latin America, especially Mexico. J. Latin Am. Stud. 30:223–48
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Ionescu G, Gellner E 1969. Populism London: Macmillan
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Laclau E 2005a. On Populist Reason London: Verso
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Laclau E 2005b. Populism: what's in a name. Populism and the Mirror of Democracy F Panizza 32–49 London: Verso
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Laclau E 2011. Politics and Ideology in Marxist Theory: Capitalism, Fascism, Populism London: Verso
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Laclau E, Mouffe C 2001. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy London: Verso
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Levitsky S, Loxton J 2013. Populism and comparative authoritarianism: the case of Fujimori's Peru. See Mudde & Kaltwasser 2013b.160–81
  34. Macpherson CB 1953. Democracy in Alberta: The Theory and Practice of a Quasi-Party System Toronto: Univ. Toronto Press
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Mair P 2002. Populist democracy versus party democracy. See Mény & Surel 2002 81–98
  36. Manin B 1997. The Principles of Representative Government Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Mazzoleni G 2008. Populism and the media. Twenty-First Century Populism: The Spectre of Western European Democracy D Albertazzi, D McDonnell 49–64 London/New York: Palgrave Macmillan
     [Google Scholar]
  38. McCormick JP 2011. Machiavellian Democracy Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Mény Y, Surel Y 2002. Democracies and the Populist Challenge New York: Palgrave Macmillan
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Mills CW 1956. The Power of Elite Oxford/London: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Moffitt B 2016. The Global Rise of Populism: Performance, Political Style, and Representation Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Morozov E 2011. The Dark Side of Internet Freedom: The New Delusion New York: Public Affairs
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Mouffe C 2005. The ‘end of politics’ and the challenge of right-wing populism. Populism and the Mirror of Democracy F Panizza 50–71 London: Verso
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Mouffe C 2016. The populist moment. Nov. 21 OpenDemocracy.net https://www.opendemocracy.net/democraciaabierta/chantal-mouffe/populist-challenge. Accessed May 2017
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Mounk Y 2018. The People versus Democracy: Why Our Freedom Is in Danger and How to Save It Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Mudde C 2004. The populist zeitgeist. Gov. Opposition 39:3541–63
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Mudde C 2017. Populism: an ideational approach. The Oxford Handbook of Populism CR Kaltwasser, P Taggart, PO Espejo, P Ostiguy 28–54 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Mudde C, Kaltwasser CR 2013a. Populism and (liberal) democracy: a framework for analysis. See Mudde & Kaltwasser 2013b 205–22
  49. Mudde C, Kaltwasser CR 2013b. Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or Corrective for Democracy? Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Müller J-W 2012. Towards a political theory of populism. Notizie Politeia 107:19–29
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Müller J-W 2016. What Is Populism? Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Murillo MV 2018. La historicidad del pueblo y los límites del populismo. Nueva Sociedad Marzo–Abril:165–74
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Norris P 1997. Passages to Power: Legislative Recruitment in Advanced Democracies Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  54. O'Donnell G 1994. Delegative democracy. J. Democracy 5:55–69
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Peruzzotti E 2013. Populism in democratic times: populism, representative democracy and the debate on democratic deepening. Latin American Populism in the Twenty-First Century C De la Torre, CJ Arnson 61–84 Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Polin R 1977. La liberté de notre temps. Paris: Vrin
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Przeworski A 1999. Minimalist conception of democracy: a defense. Democracy's Value I Shapiro, C Hacker-Cordón 23–55 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Riker WR 1982. Liberalism against Populism: A Confrontation Between the Theory of Democracy and the Theory of Social Choice Long Grove, IL: Waveland
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Roberts KM 2013. Populism and democracy in Venezuela under Hugo Chávez. See Mudde & Kaltwasser 2013b 136–59
  60. Roberts KM 2015. Populism, political mobilization, and crisis of political representation. The Promise and Perils of Populism: Global Perspectives C De la Torre 140–58 Lexington: Univ. Press Kentucky
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Rosanvallon P 2006. La contre-democratie. La politique a l'age de la defiance Paris: Seuil
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Rosenblum N 2008. On the Side of the Angels: An Appreciation of Parties and Partisanship. Princeton NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Saffon MP, González-Bertomeu JF 2017. Latin American populism: an admissible trade-off between procedural democracy and equality?. Constellations 24:416–31
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Schmitt C 2008 (1928). Constitutional Theory. J Seitzer Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press. From German
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Shils E 1956. The Torment of Secrecy Glencoe, IL: Free Press
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Skocpol T, Williamson V 2012. The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism New York: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Taggart P 2000. Populism London: Open Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Taguieff P-A 1997. Populism and political science: from conceptual illusions to real problems. Vingtième Siècle Rev. Hist. 56:44–33
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Tarchi M 2015. Italia populista. Dal qualunquismo a Beppe Grillo Bologna: Il Mulino
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Traverso E 2017. Les nouveaux visages du fascisme Paris: Textuel
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Urbinati N 1998. Democracy and populism. Constellations 5:1110–24
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Urbinati N 2014. Democracy Disfigured: Opinion, Truth and the People Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Urbinati N 2015. A revolt against intermediary bodies. Constellations 22:4477–86
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Urbinati N 2017. Populism and the principle of majority. The Oxford Handbook of Populism CR Kaltwasser, P Taggart, PO Espejo, P Ostiguy 571–89 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Walicki A 1969. Russia. Populism G Ionescu, E Gellner 62–96 London: Macmillan
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Weyland K 2001. Clarifying a contested concept: populism in the study of Latin American politics. Comp. Politics 24:11–22
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Weyland K 2013. The threat from the populist left. J. Democracy 24:118–32
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050317-070753
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error