1932

Abstract

Scholars have paid increasing attention to democratic backsliding, yet efforts to explain this phenomenon remain inchoate. This article seeks to place the study of democratic backsliding on sturdier conceptual, operational, and theoretical foundations. Conceptually, the challenge of backsliding is to define changes that take place within a political regime. Methodologically, the challenge involves measurement of intraregime changes, as alternative coding schemes change the population of units that have experienced democratic backsliding. Theoretical challenges are dual: First, despite a rich and diverse literature, we lack readily available theories to explain backsliding, and second, the theoretical debates that do exist—centered on the causes of democratic transitions, democratic breakdowns, authoritarian resilience, and democratic consolidation—remain unresolved. We consider how these theories might be called into service to explain backsliding. By doing so, the article aims to set the terms of the debate to create a common focal point around which research can coalesce.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050517-114628
2018-05-11
2024-04-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/polisci/21/1/annurev-polisci-050517-114628.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050517-114628&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Acemoglu D, Robinson J 2006. Economic Origins of Democracy and Dictatorship. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  2. Ahmed A 2014. Rethinking backsliding: insights from the historical turn in democratization studies. APSA Comp. Democratiz. Newsl. 12:32, 12–14
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Alemán J, Yang D 2011. A duration analysis of democratic transitions and authoritarian backslides. Comp. Political Stud. 44:91123–51
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Ansell B, Samuels D 2010. Inequality and democratization: a contractarian approach. Comp. Political Stud. 43:121543–74
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bates R 1974. Ethnic competition and modernization in contemporary Africa. Comp. Political Stud. 6:4457–84
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Beaulieu E, Hyde S 2009. In the shadow of democracy promotion: strategic manipulation, international observers, and election boycotts. Comp. Political Stud. 42:3392–415
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Berman S 1997. Civil society and the collapse of the Weimar Republic. World Politics 49:3401–29
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bermeo N 2003. Ordinary People in Extraordinary Times: The Citizenry and the Breakdown of Democracy Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  9. Bermeo N 2009. Does electoral democracy boost economic equality?. J. Democr. 20:421–35
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bermeo N 2016. On democratic backsliding. J. Democr. 27:15–19
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bermeo N, Yashar D 2016. Parties, movements and the making of democracy. Parties, Movements and Democracy in the Developing World N Bermeo, D Yashar 1–27 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Bernhard M, Reenock C, Nordstrom T 2003. Economic performance and survival in new democracies: Is there a honeymoon effect?. Comp. Political Stud. 36:4404–31
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Boix C 2003. Democracy and Redistribution Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  14. Boix C 2011. Democracy, development, and the international system. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 105:4809–28
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Boix C, Stokes S 2002. Endogenous democratization. World Politics 55:4515–49
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Bueno de Mesquita B, Smith A, Siverson R, Morrow J 2003. The Logic of Political Survival Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  17. Burke P, Leigh A 2010. Do output contractions trigger democratic change?. Am. Econ. J. Macroecon. 2:4124–57
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Capoccia G 2005. Defending Democracy: Reactions to Extremism in Interwar Europe Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press
  19. Cheibub J 2007. Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, and Democracy Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  20. Collier D, Levitsky S 1997. Democracy with adjectives: conceptual innovation in comparative research. World Politics 49:3430–51
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Dahl R 1971. Polyarchy: Regime and Opposition New Haven: Yale Univ. Press
  22. Diamond L 2008. The Spirit of Democracy: The Struggle to Build Free Societies Throughout the World New York: Henry Holt
  23. Djankov S, Montalvo J, Reynal-Querol M 2008. The curse of aid. J. Econ. Growth 13:3169–94
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Dunning T 2008. Crude Democracy: Natural Resource Wealth and Political Regimes Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  25. Erdmann G 2011. Decline of democracy: loss of quality, hybridisation and breakdown of democracy. Regression of Democracy? G Erdmann, M Kneuer 21–58 Wiesbaden, Ger.: Springer
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Finkel S, Horowitz J, Rojo-Mendoza R 2012. Civic education and democratic backsliding in the wake of Kenya's post-2007 election violence. J. Politics 74:152–65
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Fish M 2001. The dynamics of democratic erosion. Postcommunism and the Theory of Democracy R Anderson, M Fish, S Hanson, P Roeder 54–95 Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Fish M 2002. Islam and authoritarianism. World Politics 55:14–37
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Fishman R 2014. Democracy and markets: notes on a twenty-first century paradox. Reflections on Uneven Democracies: The Legacy of Guillermo O'Donnell D Brinks, M Leiras, S Mainwaring 106–20 Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Freedom House. 2016. Freedom in the World, 2016 https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/FH_FITW_Report_2016.pdf. Accessed Feb. 22, 2017
  31. Gibler DM, Randazzo KA 2011. Testing the effects of independent judiciaries on the likelihood of democratic backsliding. Am. J. Political Sci. 55:3696–709
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Gleditsch K, Ward M 2006. Diffusion and the international context of democratization. Int. Organ. 60:4911–33
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Goldstone J, Bates R, Epstein D, Gurr T, Lustik M et al. 2010. A global model for forecasting political instability. Am. J. Political Sci. 54:1190–208
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Haber S, Menaldo V 2011. Do natural resources fuel authoritarianism: a reappraisal of the resource curse. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 105:11–26
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Haggard S, Kaufman R 1995. The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  36. Haggard S, Kaufman R 2012. Inequality and regime change: democratic transitions and the stability of democratic rule. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 106:3495–516
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Highton B 2017. Voter identification laws and turnout in the United States. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 20:149–67
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Houle C 2009. Inequality and democracy: why inequality harms consolidation but does not affect democratization. World Politics 61:4589–622
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Huntington S 1968. Political Order in Changing Societies New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  40. Hyde S 2007. The observer effect in international politics: evidence from a natural experiment. World Politics 60:137–63
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Inglehart R, Welzel C 2005. Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  42. Kapstein E, Converse N 2008. The Fate of Young Democracies Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  43. Kelley J 2009. D-minus elections: the politics and norms of international election observation. Int. Organ. 63:4765–87
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Kelley J 2012. Monitoring Democracy: When International Election Observation Works and Why It Often Fails Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  45. Knack S 2004. Does foreign aid promote democracy?. Int. Stud. Q. 48:1251–66
    [Google Scholar]
  46. LeBas A 2011. From Protest to Parties: Party-Building and Democratization in Africa Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  47. Levitsky S, Way L 2006. Linkage versus leverage. rethinking the international dimension of regime change. Comp. Politics 38:4379–400
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Levitsky S, Way L 2010. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes and the Cold War Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  49. Levitsky S, Way L 2015. The myth of democratic recession. J. Democr. 26:145–58
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Levitsky S, Ziblatt D 2016. Is Donald Trump a threat to democracy?. N. Y. Times Dec. 16. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/16/opinion/sunday/is-donald-trump-a-threat-to-democracy.html?_r=0
  51. Levitz P, Pop-Eleches G 2010. Why no backsliding? The European Union's impact on democracy and governance before and after accession. Comp. Political Stud. 43:4457–85
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Lijphart A 1977. Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  53. Linz J 1978. The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes: Crisis, Breakdown, and Reequilibration Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press
  54. Linz J 1990. The perils of presidentialism. J. Democr. 1:151–69
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Lueders H, Lust E 2018. Multiple measurements, elusive agreement, and unstable outcomes in the study of regime change. J. Politics. In press
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Lust E, Waldner D 2015. Theories of democratic change, phase I: theories of democratic backsliding. Rep., May 13, Inst. Int. Washington, DC. https://www.iie.org/en/Research-and-Insights/Publications/DFG-Yale-TOC-Publication
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Lust E, Waldner D 2016. Parties in transitional democracies: authoritarian legacies and post-authoritarian challenges in the Middle East and North Africa. Parties, Movements and Democracy in the Developing World N Bermeo, D Yashar 157–89 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Mainwaring S 1999. Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave of Democratization: The Case of Brazil Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
  59. Mainwaring S, Pérez-Liñán A 2014. Democracies and Dictatorships in Latin America: Emergence, Survival, and Fall Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  60. Mainwaring S, Shugart M 1997. Juan Linz, presidentialism, and democracy: a critical appraisal. Comp. Politics 29:4449–71
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Marinov N, Goemans H 2014. Coups and democracy. Br. J. Political Sci. 44:4799–825
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Marshall MG, Keith J, Ted RG 2014. Polity IV annual time-series 18002013 http://www.systemicpeace.org/polityproject.html. Accessed Oct. 24, 2014
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Mazzuca S 2013. The rise of rentier populism. J. Democr. 24:2108–22
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Mickey R, Levitsky S, Way L 2017. Is America still safe for democracy? Why the United States is in danger of backsliding. Foreign Aff 96:May/June20–29
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Moore B Jr. 1966. Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World Boston: Beacon
  66. Negretto G 2013. Making Constitutions: Presidents, Parties, and Institutional Choice in Latin America New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  67. O'Donnell G, Schmitter P 1986. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press
  68. Pepinsky T 2013. The institutional turn in comparative authoritarianism. Br. J. Political Sci. 44:3631–53
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Powell G 1982. Contemporary Democracies: Participation, Stability, and Violence Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  70. Przeworski A, Limongi F 1997. Modernization: theory and facts. World Politics 49:2155–83
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Putnam R 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  72. Rabushka A, Shepsle K 1972. Politics in Plural Societies Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill
  73. Reynolds A 2011. Designing Democracy in a Dangerous World Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  74. Riedl R 2014. Authoritarian Origins of Democratic Party Systems in Africa Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  75. Ross M 2012. The Oil Curse: How Petroleum Wealth Shapes the Development of Nations Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  76. Rueschemeyer D, Huber Stephens E, Stephens J 1992. Capitalist Development and Democracy Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  77. Sartori G 1970. Concept misformation in comparative politics. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 64:41033–53
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Schickler E 2016. Racial Realignment: The Transformation of American Liberalism, 19321965 Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Seawright J 2012. Party-System Collapse: The Roots of Crisis in Peru and Venezuela Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
  80. Skaaning S-E, John G, Henrikas B 2015. A lexical index of electoral democracy. Comp. Political Stud. 48:121491–525
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Slater D 2013. Democratic careening. World Politics 65:4729–63
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Slater D, Smith B, Nair G 2014. Economic origins of democratic breakdown? The redistributive model and the postcolonial state. Perspect. Politics 12:2353–74
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Superville D, Swanson E 2017. Poll shows most doubt Trump's respect for institutions. Associated Press June 14. http://www.apnorc.org/news-media/Pages/Poll-shows-most-doubt-Trump%E2%80%99s-respect-for-institutions.aspx
  84. Svolik M 2014. Which democracies will last? Coups, incumbent takeovers, and the dynamic of democratic consolidation. Br. J. Political Sci. 45:4715–38
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Svolik M 2017. When polarization trumps civic virtue: partisan conflict and the subversion of democracy by incumbents Work. Pap., Dep. Political Sci., Yale Univ.
  86. Van de Walle N 2003. Presidentialism and clientelism in Africa's emerging party systems. J. Mod. Afr. Stud. 41:2297–321
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Wahman M, Teorell J, Hadenius A 2013. Authoritarian regime types revisited: updated data in comparative perspective. Contemp. Politics 19:119–34
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Waldner D, Smith B 2015. Rentier states and state transformations. Oxford Handbook on Transformations of the State S Leibfried, E Huber, M Lange, J Levy, F Nullmeier, J Stephens Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Weyland K, Madrid R, Hunter W 2010. Leftist Governments in Latin America: Successes and Shortcomings Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  90. Wright J 2009. How foreign aid can foster democratization in authoritarian regimes. Am. J. Political Sci. 53:3552–71
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050517-114628
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050517-114628
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error