1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Political Science
  4. Volume 20, 2017
  5. Article

Annual Review of Political Science

Volume 20, 2017

Bureaucracy and Service Delivery

Abstract

This article reviews the literature on the politics of bureaucracy in the developing world, with a focus on service delivery and bureaucratic performance. We survey classic topics and themes such as the developmental state, principal–agent relations, and the efficient grease hypothesis, and we link them to new research findings in political science, sociology, and economics. We identify the concept of embeddedness as an important yet still underexplored framework that cuts across disciplines and may be used to understand bureaucratic performance and service delivery. Looking forward, we outline a framework for conceptualizing bureaucratic action by exploiting variation across time, space, task, and client, and we identify promising areas for further research on the bureaucrat–citizen encounter in developing countries.

Keyword(s): civil servants, developmental state, embeddedness, principal–agent relations, street-level bureaucrats
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051215-022705
2017-05-11
2025-04-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/polisci/20/1/annurev-polisci-051215-022705.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051215-022705&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Adolph C. 2013. Bankers, Bureaucrats, and Central Bank Politics: The Myth of Neutrality New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  2. Amsden A. 1989. Asia's Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  3. Andrews M, Pritchett L, Woolcock M. 2013. Escaping capability traps through problem driven iterative adaptation (PDIA). World Dev. 51:234–44 [Google Scholar]
  4. Arriola LR. 2013. Capital and opposition in Africa: coalition building in multiethnic societies. World Polit. 65:233–72 [Google Scholar]
  5. Auyero J. 2011. Patients of the state: an ethnographic account of poor people's waiting. Latin Am. Res. Rev. 46:5–29 [Google Scholar]
  6. Banerjee A, Chattopadhyay R, Duflo E, Keniston D, Singh N. 2014. Can institutions be reformed from within? Evidence from a randomized experiment with the Rajasthan police Work. pap., Dep. Econ., Mass. Inst. Technol. [Google Scholar]
  7. Banerjee R, Baul T, Rosenblat T. 2015. On self selection of the corrupt into the public sector. Econ. Lett. 127:43–46 [Google Scholar]
  8. Banks JS, Weingast BR. 1992. The political control of bureaucracies under asymmetric information. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 36:509–24 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bardhan P. 1997. Corruption and development: a review of issues. J. Econ. Lit. 35:1320–46 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bernstein TP, Lü X. 2003. Taxation without Representation in Contemporary Rural China Cambridge/New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  11. Besley T. 2006. Principled Agents? The Political Economy of Good Government New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  12. Bhavnani RR, Lee A. 2016. Local embeddedness and bureaucratic performance: evidence from India Work. pap., Dep. Polit. Sci., Univ. Wisc. [Google Scholar]
  13. Boone C. 1990. State power and economic crisis in Senegal. Comp. Polit. 22:341–57 [Google Scholar]
  14. Bratton M. 1992. Zambia starts over. J. Democr. 3:81–94 [Google Scholar]
  15. Brooke HSG, Gans-Morse J. 2016. Putin's crackdown on mortality: rethinking legal nihilism and state capacity in light of Russia's surprising public health campaigns. Probl. Post-Communism 63:1–15 [Google Scholar]
  16. Brown DR. 1999. Ethnic politics and public sector management in Trinidad and Guyana. Public Adm. Dev. 19:367–79 [Google Scholar]
  17. Burt RS. 1999. The social capital of opinion leaders. Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 566:37–54 [Google Scholar]
  18. Callen M, Gulzar S, Hasanain A, Khan Y. 2014. The political economy of public employee absence: experimental evidence from Pakistan Work. pap., Rady School Manage., Univ. Calif., San Diego [Google Scholar]
  19. Callen M, Gulzar S, Hasanain A, Khan Y, Rezaee A. 2015. Personalities and public sector performance: evidence from a health experiment in Pakistan NBER Work. Pap. No. 21180, Natl. Bur. Econ. Res., Cambridge, MA [Google Scholar]
  20. Carpenter DP. 2001. The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy: Reputations, Networks, and Policy Innovation in the Executive Agencies, 1862–1928 Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  21. Chan KK, Misra S. 1990. Characteristics of the opinion leader: a new dimension. J. Advert. 19:53–60 [Google Scholar]
  22. Chaudhury N, Hammer J, Kremer M, Muralidharan K, Rogers FH. 2006. Missing in action: teacher and health worker absence in developing countries. J. Econ. Perspect. 20:91–116 [Google Scholar]
  23. Cingolani L, Thomsson K, de Crombrugghe D. 2015. Minding Weber more than ever? the impacts of state capacity and bureaucratic autonomy on development goals. World Dev. 72:191–207 [Google Scholar]
  24. Cowley E, Smith S. 2013. Motivation and mission in the public sector: evidence from the World Values Survey. Theory Decis. 76:241–63 [Google Scholar]
  25. Cruz C, Keefer P. 2015. Political parties, clientelism, and bureaucratic reform. Comp. Polit. Stud. 48:1942–73 [Google Scholar]
  26. Dahlströhm C, Lapuente V, Teorell J. 2011. The merit of meritocratization: politics, bureaucracy, and the institutional deterrents of corruption. Polit. Res. Q. 65:656–68 [Google Scholar]
  27. Bó E, Finan F, Rossi MA. Dal 2013. Strengthening state capabilities: the role of financial incentives in the call to public service. Q. J. Econ. 128:1169–218 [Google Scholar]
  28. Diaz-Cayeros A, Magaloni B, Romero V. 2015. Caught in the crossfire: the geography of extortion and police corruption in Mexico Work. pap., Stanford Cent. Int. Dev., Stanford Univ. [Google Scholar]
  29. Dietrich S, Winters MS. 2015. Foreign aid and government legitimacy. J. Exp. Polit. Sci. 2:164–71 [Google Scholar]
  30. Dixit A. 2002. Incentives and organizations in the public sector: an interpretative review. J. Hum. Resour. 37:696–727 [Google Scholar]
  31. Doner RF, Ritchie BK, Slater D. 2005. Systemic vulnerability and the origins of developmental states: Northeast and Southeast Asia in comparative perspective. Int. Organ. 59:327–61 [Google Scholar]
  32. Duflo E, Hanna R, Ryan SP. 2012. Incentives work: getting teachers to come to school. Am. Econ. Rev. 102:1241–78 [Google Scholar]
  33. Esman MJ. 1999. Public administration and conflict management in plural societies: the case for representative bureaucracy. Public Adm. Dev. 19:353–66 [Google Scholar]
  34. Evans P. 1995. Embedded Autonomy Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  35. Evans P, Rauch JE. 1999. Bureaucracy and growth: a cross-national analysis of the effects of “Weberian” state structures on economic growth. Am. Sociol. Rev. 64:748–65 [Google Scholar]
  36. Evans PB. 1989. Predatory, developmental, and other apparatuses: a comparative political economy perspective on the Third World state. Sociol. Forum 4:561–87 [Google Scholar]
  37. Finan F, Olken BA, Pande R. 2015. The personnel economics of the state NBER Work. Pap. No. 21825, Natl. Bur. Econ. Res., Cambridge, MA [Google Scholar]
  38. Fjeldstad OH. 2005. Corruption in tax administration: lessons from institutional reforms in Uganda Tech. rep., Chr. Michelsen Inst. (CMI), Bergen, Norway [Google Scholar]
  39. Franck R, Rainer I. 2012. Does the leader's ethnicity matter? Ethnic favoritism, education, and health in sub-Saharan Africa. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 106:294–325 [Google Scholar]
  40. Gailmard S, Patty JW. 2007. Slackers and zealots: civil service, policy discretion, and bureaucratic expertise. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 51:873–89 [Google Scholar]
  41. Gailmard S, Patty JW. 2012. Formal models of bureaucracy. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 15:353–77 [Google Scholar]
  42. Gallagher ME. 2006. Mobilizing the law in China: “informed disenchantment” and the development of legal consciousness. Law Soc. Rev. 40:783–816 [Google Scholar]
  43. Golden MA. 2003. Electoral connections: the effects of the personal vote on political patronage, bureaucracy and legislation in postwar Italy. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 33:189–212 [Google Scholar]
  44. Goodsell CT. 1981. The Public Encounter: Where State and Citizen Meet Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  45. Granovetter M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. Am. J. Sociol. 91:481–510 [Google Scholar]
  46. Granovetter M. 2007. The social construction of corruption. On Capitalism V Nee, R Swedberg 152–72 Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  47. Grindle MS. 1997. Divergent cultures? When public organizations perform well in developing countries. World Dev. 25:481–95 [Google Scholar]
  48. Grindle MS. 2012. Jobs for the Boys: Patronage and the State in Comparative Perspective Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  49. Gulzar S. 2015. Can political alignment be costly? Work. pap., Dep. Polit., New York Univ. [Google Scholar]
  50. Gulzar S, Pasquale B. 2017. Politicians, bureaucrats, and development: evidence from India. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. In press [Google Scholar]
  51. Gupta A. 2012. Red Tape: Bureaucracy, Structural Violence, and Poverty in India Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  52. Hammond TH, Knott JH. 1996. Who controls the bureaucracy? Presidential power, congressional dominance, legal constraints, and bureaucratic autonomy in a model of multi-institutional policy-making. J. Law Econ. Organ. 12:119–66 [Google Scholar]
  53. Hasnain Z, Manning N, Pierskalla JH. 2014. The promise of performance pay? Reasons for caution in policy prescriptions in the core civil service. World Bank Res. Obs. 29:235–64 [Google Scholar]
  54. Herbst J. 2000. States and Power in Africa: Comparative Lessons in Authority and Control Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  55. Hertzberg A, Liberti JM, Paravisini D. 2010. Information and incentives inside the firm: evidence from loan officer rotation. J. Finance 65:795–828 [Google Scholar]
  56. Hetherington K. 2011. Guerrilla Auditors: The Politics of Transparency in Neoliberal Paraguay Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  57. Hicken A. 2011. Clientelism. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 14:289–310 [Google Scholar]
  58. Holmstrom B, Milgrom P. 1991. Multitask principal-agent analyses: incentive contracts, asset ownership, and job design. J. Law Econ. Organ. 7:24–52 [Google Scholar]
  59. Huber JD, Shipan C. 2002. Deliberate Discretion? The Institutional Foundations of Bureaucratic Autonomy New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  60. Hull MS. 2012a. Documents and bureaucracy. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 41:251–67 [Google Scholar]
  61. Hull MS. 2012b. Government of Paper: The Materiality of Bureaucracy in Urban Pakistan Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press [Google Scholar]
  62. Iyer L, Mani A. 2011. Traveling agents: political change and bureaucratic turnover in India. Rev. Econ. Stat. 94:723–39 [Google Scholar]
  63. Johnson C. 1982. MITI and the Japanese Miracle. The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925–1975. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  64. Kaufman D. 2005. 10 Myths about governance and corruption. Finance Dev. 42:41–43 [Google Scholar]
  65. Kaufmann D, Wei SJ. 2000. Does `grease money’ speed up the wheels of commerce? IMF Work. Pap. WP/00/64, Int. Monet. Fund, Washington, DC [Google Scholar]
  66. Keefer P. 2007. Clientelism, credibility, and the policy choices of young democracies. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 51:804–21 [Google Scholar]
  67. Keefer P, Banuri S. 2013. Intrinsic motivation, effort and the call to public service. Tech. Rep. WPS6729, The World Bank, Washington, DC
  68. Keefer P, Stasavage D. 2003. The limits of delegation: veto players, central bank independence, and the credibility of monetary policy. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 97:407–23 [Google Scholar]
  69. Kelly JA, St. Lawrence JS, Diaz YE, Stevenson LY, Hauth AC. et al. 1991. HIV risk behavior reduction following intervention with key opinion leaders of population: an experimental analysis. Am. J. Public Health 81:168–71 [Google Scholar]
  70. Khan AQ, Khwaja AI, Olken BA. 2016. Tax farming redux: experimental evidence on performance pay for tax collectors. Q. J. Econ. 131:219–71 [Google Scholar]
  71. Kiewiet DR, McCubbins MD. 1991. The Logic of Delegation Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  72. Kiser E, Kane J. 2001. Revolution and state structure: the bureaucratization of tax administration in early modern England and France. Am. J. Sociol. 107:183–223 [Google Scholar]
  73. Kiser E, Sacks A. 2009. Improving tax administration in contemporary African states: lessons from history. The New Fiscal Sociology I Martin, A Mehrotra, M Prasad 183–200 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  74. Kitschelt H, Wilkinson SI. 2007. Citizen-politician linkages: an introduction. Patrons, Clients, and Policies. Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition H Kitschelt, SI Wilkinson 1–49 New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  75. Kohli A. 2004. State-Directed Development. Political Power and Industrialization in the Global Periphery. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  76. Kosack S, Fung A. 2014. Does transparency improve governance?. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 17:65–87 [Google Scholar]
  77. Kumlin S, Rothstein B. 2005. Making and breaking social capital: the impact of welfare-state institutions. Comp. Polit. Stud. 38:339–65 [Google Scholar]
  78. Kurtz MJ, Schrank A. 2007. Growth and governance: models, measures, and mechanisms. J. Polit. 69:538–54 [Google Scholar]
  79. Lazear EP. 1999. Globalisation and the market for team-mates. Econ. J. 109:C15–40 [Google Scholar]
  80. Lehmann U, Sanders D. 2007. Community health workers: what do we know about them? Rep. World Health Organ., Geneva [Google Scholar]
  81. Levi M, Sacks A, Tyler T. 2009. Conceptualizing legitimacy, measuring legitimating beliefs. Am. Behav. Sci. 53:354–75 [Google Scholar]
  82. Lipsky M. 1980. Street-level Bureaucracy. Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service. New York: Russell Sage Found. [Google Scholar]
  83. Marcesse T. 2016. Public policy and informal institutions: the new moral economy of corruption in rural India. Work. pap., Dep. Gov., Cornell Univ. [Google Scholar]
  84. McCubbins MD, Noll RG, Weingast BR. 1987. Administrative procedures as instruments of political control. J. Law Econ. Organ. 3:243–77 [Google Scholar]
  85. Mettler S. 1998. Dividing Citizens: Gender and Federalism in the New Deal Public Policy Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  86. Moe TM. 1984. The new economics of organization. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 28:739–77 [Google Scholar]
  87. Nath A. 2014. Bureaucrats and politicians: how does electoral competition affect bureaucratic performance? Work. pap., Inst. Econ. Dev., Boston Univ. [Google Scholar]
  88. Nichter S. 2008. Vote buying or turnout buying? Machine politics and the secret ballot. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 102:19–31 [Google Scholar]
  89. O'Brien KJ, Li L. 1995. The politics of lodging complaints in rural China. China Q. 143:756–83 [Google Scholar]
  90. Oldenburg P. 1987. Middlemen in Third-World corruption: implications of an Indian case. World Polit. 39:508–35 [Google Scholar]
  91. Olken B. 2006. Corruption and the cost of redistribution. Micro evidence from Indonesia. J. Public Econ. 90:853–70 [Google Scholar]
  92. Olken B. 2007. Monitoring corruption: evidence from a field experiment in Indonesia. J. Polit. Econ. 115:200–49 [Google Scholar]
  93. Olken BA, Pande R. 2012. Corruption in developing countries. Annu. Rev. Econ. 4:479–509 [Google Scholar]
  94. Penfold-Becerra M. 2007. Clientelism and social funds: evidence from Chávez's misiones. Latin Am. Polit. Soc. 49:63–84 [Google Scholar]
  95. Perry JL, Hondegheim A. 2008. Building theory and empirical evidence about public service motivation. Int. Public Manag. J. 11:3–12 [Google Scholar]
  96. Persson A, Rothstein B, Teorell J. 2013. Why anticorruption reforms fail—systemic corruption as a collective action problem. Governance 26:449–71 [Google Scholar]
  97. Pritchett L, Woolcock M, Andrews M. 2013. Looking like a state: techniques of persistent failure in state capability for implementation. J. Dev. Stud. 49:1–18 [Google Scholar]
  98. Ramseyer JM, Rosenbluth FM. 1993. Japan's Political Marketplace Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  99. Rasul I, Rogger D. 2015. The impact of ethnic diversity in bureaucracies: evidence from the Nigerian Civil Service. Am. Econ. Rev. 105:457–61 [Google Scholar]
  100. Rasul I, Rogger D. 2016. Management of bureaucrats and public service delivery: evidence from the Nigerian civil service. Econ. J. In press [Google Scholar]
  101. Ricks JI. 2016. Building participatory organizations for common pool resource management: water user group promotion in Indonesia. World Dev. 77:34–47 [Google Scholar]
  102. Rogger D. 2014. The causes and consequences of political interference in bureaucratic decision making: evidence from Nigeria. Work. pap., Dep. Econ., Univ. College London [Google Scholar]
  103. Ross M. 2006. Is democracy good for the poor?. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 50:860–74 [Google Scholar]
  104. Roth G. 1968. Personal rulership, patrimonialism, and empire-building in the new states. World Polit. 20:194–206 [Google Scholar]
  105. Sacks A. 2012. Can donors and non-state actors undermine citizens’ legitimating beliefs? World Bank Policy Res. Work. Pap., The World Bank, Washington, DC [Google Scholar]
  106. Shore LM, Chung-Herrera BG, Dean MA, Ehrhart KH, Jung DI. et al. 2009. Diversity in organizations: Where are we now and where are we going?. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 19:117–33 [Google Scholar]
  107. Snyder SK, Weingast BR. 2000. The American system of shared powers: the President, Congress, and the NLRB. J. Law Econ. Organ. 16:269–305 [Google Scholar]
  108. Soss J. 2005. Making clients and citizens: welfare policy as a source of status, belief, and action. Deserving and Entitled: Social Constructions and Public Policy A Schneider, H Ingram 291–328 Albany, NY: State Univ. New York Press [Google Scholar]
  109. Stokes SC. 2005. Perverse accountability: a formal model of machine politics with evidence from Argentina. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 99:315–25 [Google Scholar]
  110. Stovel K, Savage M. 2006. Mergers and mobility: organizational growth and the origins of career migration at Lloyds Bank. Am. J. Sociol. 111:1080–121 [Google Scholar]
  111. Svensson J. 2005. Eight questions about corruption. J. Econ. Perspect. 19:19–42 [Google Scholar]
  112. Szeftel M. 1982. Political graft and the spoils system in Zambia: the state as a resource in itself. Rev. Afr. Polit. Econ. 9:4–21 [Google Scholar]
  113. Tendler J, Freeheim S. 1994. Trust in a rent-seeking world: health and government transformed in northeast Brazil. World Dev. 22:1771–91 [Google Scholar]
  114. Thies CG. 2005. War, rivalry, and state building in Latin America. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 49:451–65 [Google Scholar]
  115. Tilly C. 1985. War making and state making as organized crime. Bringing the State Back In P Evans, D Rueschemeyer, T Skocpol 169–91 New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  116. Tsai L. 2007. Accountability without Democracy New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  117. Tyler TR. 1990. Why People Obey the Law Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  118. Wade R. 1990. Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  119. Weber M. 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press [Google Scholar]
  120. Weitz-Shapiro R. 2012. What wins votes: why some politicians opt out of clientelism. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 56:568–83 [Google Scholar]
  121. Whitford AB. 2005. The pursuit of political control by multiple principals. J. Polit. 67:28–49 [Google Scholar]
  122. Wilson JQ. 1991. Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It New York: Basic Books [Google Scholar]
  123. Wimmer A. 1997. Who owns the state? Understanding ethnic conflict in post-colonial societies. Nations Nationalism 3:631–66 [Google Scholar]
  124. Woo-Cummings M. 1999. The Developmental State Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051215-022705
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error