1932

Abstract

A review of research findings and polling data about Americans’ attitudes on climate change reveals a lack of meaningful long-term change in mass opinion. Instead, the structure of Americans’ attitudes toward belief in climate change's existence, concern about its consequences, and demand for policy response is similar to that regarding many other issues in contemporary US politics: stability in aggregate opinion that masks partisan and ideological polarization enhanced by communications from elites. But features of the climate change problem elicit some distinctive determinants of opinion, including individuals’ trust in science, risk processing, and personal experience. Although our review of the literature and data leaves us skeptical that majority opinion will spur elected officials anytime soon to undertake the costly solutions necessary to tackle this problem comprehensively at the national level, we identify several avenues by which attitudes might promote less substantial but nevertheless consequential policy action.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051215-022857
2017-05-11
2024-04-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/polisci/20/1/annurev-polisci-051215-022857.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051215-022857&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abramowitz AI, Saunders KL. 2008. Is polarization a myth. ? J. Polit. 70:542–55 [Google Scholar]
  2. Adams GD. 1997. Abortion: evidence of an issue evolution. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 41:718–37 [Google Scholar]
  3. Albertson B, Busby JW. 2015. Hearts or minds? Identifying persuasive messages on climate change. Res. Polit. 2. doi: 10.1177/2053168015577712
  4. Andrews K, Boykoff M, Brulle R, Daly M, Gifford L. et al. 2016. US coverage of climate change or global warming,2000–2016 Boulder, CO: Cent. Sci. Technol. Res., Coop. Inst. Res. Environ. Sci., Univ. Colorado http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/media_coverage
  5. Ansolabehere S, Konisky DM. 2014. Cheap and Clean: How Americans Think about Energy in the Age of Global Warming. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  6. Arbuckle MB, Konisky DM. 2015. The role of religion in environmental attitudes. Soc. Sci. Q. 96:1244–63 [Google Scholar]
  7. Baldassare M, Bonner D, Kordus D, Lopes L. 2015. PPIC Statewide Survey: Californians and the Environment. San Francisco, CA: Public Policy Inst. Calif. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bartels LM. 2002. Beyond the running tally: partisan bias in political perceptions. Polit. Behav. 24:117–50 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bechtel MM, Scheve KF. 2013. Mass support for global climate agreements depends on institutional design. PNAS 110:13763–68 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bernauer T. 2013. Climate change politics. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 16:421–48 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bernauer T, McGrath LF. 2016. Simple reframing unlikely to boost public support for climate policy. Nat. Climate Change 6:680–83 [Google Scholar]
  12. Betsill MM, Rabe BG. 2009. Climate change and multilevel governance: the evolving state and local roles. Toward Sustainable Communities: Transition and Transformations in Environmental Policy. DA Mazmanian, ME Kraft 201–26 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  13. Bolsen T, Leeper TJ, Shapiro MA. 2014. Doing what others do: norms, science and collective action on global warming. Am. Polit. Res. 42:65–89 [Google Scholar]
  14. Borick CP, Rabe BG. 2014. Weather or not? Examining the impact of meteorological conditions on public opinion regarding global warming. Weather Climate Soc 6:413–24 [Google Scholar]
  15. Bowman K, O'Neil E, Sims H. 2016. Polls on the environment, energy, global warming and nuclear power. AEI Public Opin. Stud., Apr 21 Washington, DC: Am. Enterp. Inst. [Google Scholar]
  16. Boykoff MT. 2007. Flogging a dead norm? Newspaper coverage of anthropogenic climate change in the United States and United Kingdom from 2003 to 2006. Area 39:470–81 [Google Scholar]
  17. Boykoff MT. 2008. Lost in translation? United States television news coverage of anthropogenic climate change, 1995–2004. Climatic Change 86:1–11 [Google Scholar]
  18. Brody SD, Zahran S, Vedlitz A, Himanshu G. 2008. Examining the relationship between physical vulnerability and public perceptions of global climate change in the United States. Environ. Behav. 40:72–95 [Google Scholar]
  19. Brulle RJ, Carmichael J, Jenkins JC. 2012. Shifting public opinion on climate change: an empirical assessment of factors influencing concern over climate change in the U.S., 2002–2010. Climatic Change 114:169–88 [Google Scholar]
  20. Campbell TH, Kay AC. 2014. Solution aversion: on the relation between ideology and motivated disbelief. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 107:809–24 [Google Scholar]
  21. Carmines EG, Stimson JA. 1989. Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  22. Center for Climate and Energy Solutions. 2014. U.S. climate policy maps: table of state initiatives. http://www.c2es.org/docUploads/all-state-initiatives-feb-2014.pdf
  23. Comparative Agendas Project. 2016. Gallup's most important problem (dataset) http://comparativeagendas.s3.amazonaws.com/datasetfiles/Gallups_Most_Important_Problem.csv
  24. Deryugina T. 2013. How do people update? The effects of local weather fluctuations on beliefs about global warming. Climatic Change 118:397–416 [Google Scholar]
  25. Downs A. 1972. Up and down with ecology—the “issue-attention cycle.”. Natl. Aff. 28:38–50 [Google Scholar]
  26. Druckman JN. 2015. Eliminating the local warming effect. Nat. Climate Change 5:176–77 [Google Scholar]
  27. Egan PJ. 2013. Partisan Priorities: How Issue Ownership Drives and Distorts American Politics. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  28. Egan PJ, Mullin M. 2012. Turning personal experience into political attitudes: the effect of local weather on Americans’ perceptions about global warming. J. Polit. 74:796–809 [Google Scholar]
  29. Egan PJ, Mullin M. 2016. Recent improvement and projected worsening of weather in the United States. Nature 532:357–60 [Google Scholar]
  30. Elsasser SW, Dunlap RE. 2013. Leading voices in the denier choir: conservative columnists’ dismissal of global warming and denigration of climate science. Am. Behav. Sci. 57:754–76 [Google Scholar]
  31. Erikson RS, Wright GC, McIver JP. 1993. Statehouse Democracy: Public Opinion and Policy in the American States. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  32. Feinberg M, Willer R. 2011. Apocalypse soon? Dire messages reduce belief in global warming by contradicting just-world beliefs. Psychol. Sci. 22:34–38 [Google Scholar]
  33. Goebbert K, Jenkins-Smith HG, Klockow K, Nowlin MC, Silva CS. 2012. Weather, climate, and worldviews: the sources and consequences of public perceptions of changes in local weather patterns. Weather Climate Soc 4:132–44 [Google Scholar]
  34. Gromet DM, Kunreuther H, Larrick RP. 2013. Political ideology affects energy-efficiency attitudes and choices. PNAS 110:9314–19 [Google Scholar]
  35. Guber DL. 2013. A cooling climate for change? Party polarization and the politics of global warming. Am. Behav. Sci. 57:93–115 [Google Scholar]
  36. Guber DL, Bosso C. 2013.. “ High hopes and bitter disappointment”: public discourse and the limits of the environmental movement in climate change politics. Environmental Policy: New Directions for the 21st Century NJ Vig, ME Kraft 54–82 Los Angeles, CA: Sage, 8th ed.. [Google Scholar]
  37. Hamilton LC, Hartter J, Lemcke-Stampone MD, Moore W, Stafford TG. 2015. Tracking public beliefs about anthropogenic climate change. PLOS ONE 10:e0138208 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0138208 [Google Scholar]
  38. Hardisty DJ, Johnson EJ, Weber EU. 2009. A dirty word or a dirty world? Attribute framing, political affiliation, and query theory. Psychol. Sci. 20:1–7 [Google Scholar]
  39. Hart PS, Nisbet EC. 2012. Boomerang effects in science communication: how motivated reasoning and identity cues amplify opinion polarization about climate mitigation policies. Commun. Res. 39:701–23 [Google Scholar]
  40. Healy A, Malhotra N. 2009. Myopic voters and natural disaster policy. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 103:387–406 [Google Scholar]
  41. Hornsey MJ, Harris EA, Bain PG, Fielding KS. 2016. Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change. Nat. Climate Change 6:622–26 [Google Scholar]
  42. Howe PD, Mildenberger M, Marlon JR, Leiserowitz A. 2015. Geographic variation in opinions on climate change at state and local scales in the USA. Nat. Climate Change 5:596–603 [Google Scholar]
  43. Jacques PJ, Dunlap RE, Freeman M. 2008. The organization of denial. Environ. Polit. 17:349–85 [Google Scholar]
  44. Javeline D. 2014. The most important topic political scientists are not studying: adapting to climate change. Perspect. Polit. 12:420–34 [Google Scholar]
  45. Jerit J, Barabas J. 2012. Partisan perceptual bias and the information environment. J. Polit. 74:672–84 [Google Scholar]
  46. Joireman J, Truelove HB, Duell B. 2010. Effect of outdoor temperature, heat primes and anchoring on belief of global warming. J. Environ. Psychol. 30:358–67 [Google Scholar]
  47. Kahan DM. 2015. Climate-science communication and the measurement problem. Polit. Psychol. 36:S11–43 [Google Scholar]
  48. Kahan DM, Peters E, Wittlin M, Slovic P, Ouellette LL. et al. 2012. The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nat. Climate Change 2:732–35 [Google Scholar]
  49. Konisky DM, Hughes L, Kaylor CH. 2016. Extreme weather events and climate change concern. Climatic Change 134:533–47 [Google Scholar]
  50. Krosnick JA, Holbrook AL, Visser PS. 2000. The impact of the fall 2007 debate about global warming on American public opinion. Public Underst. Sci. 9:239–60 [Google Scholar]
  51. Kunda Z. 1990. The case for motivated reasoning. Psychol. Bull. 108:480–98 [Google Scholar]
  52. Layman GC, Carsey TM. 2002. Party polarization and “conflict extension” in the American electorate. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 46:786–802 [Google Scholar]
  53. Leiserowitz A. 2006. Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: the role of affect, imagery, and values. Climatic Change 77:45–72 [Google Scholar]
  54. Leiserowitz AA, Maibach EW, Roser-Renouf C, Smith N, Dawson E. 2013. Climategate, public opinion, and the loss of trust. Am. Behav. Sci. 57:818–37 [Google Scholar]
  55. Levendusky M. 2009. The Partisan Sort: How Liberals Became Democrats and Conservatives Became Republicans. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  56. Lindaman K, Haider-Markel DP. 2002. Issue evolution, political parties, and the culture wars. Polit. Res. Q. 55:91–110 [Google Scholar]
  57. Lubell M, Zahran S, Vedlitz A. 2007. Collective action and citizen responses to global warming. Polit. Behav. 29:391–413 [Google Scholar]
  58. Malka A, Krosnick JA, Langer G. 2009. The association of knowledge with concern about global warming: trusted information sources shape public thinking. Risk Anal 29:633–47 [Google Scholar]
  59. Mayer FW. 2012. Stories of climate change: competing narratives, the media and U.S. public opinion: 2001–2010 Joan Shorenstein Cent. Press, Politics and Public Policy Disc. Pap. Ser. #D-72, Feb Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ.
  60. McCarthy J. 2016. Worry about terror attacks in U.S. high, but not top concern. Washington, DC: Gallup http://www.gallup.com/poll/190253/worry-terror-attacks-high-not-top-concern.aspx
  61. McCright AM, Dunlap RE. 2003. Defeating Kyoto: the conservative movement's impact on U.S. climate change policy. Soc. Probl. 50:348–73 [Google Scholar]
  62. McCright AM, Dunlap RE. 2011. The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public's views of global warming, 2001–2010. Sociol. Q. 52:155–94 [Google Scholar]
  63. McCright AM, Xiao C, Dunlap RE. 2014. Political polarization on support for government spending on environmental protection in the USA, 1974–2012. Soc. Sci. Res. 48:251–60 [Google Scholar]
  64. Melillo JM, Richmond TC, Yohe GW. 2014. Climate Change Impacts in the United States: The Third National Climate Assessment. Washington, DC: US Global Change Res. Progr. [Google Scholar]
  65. Moser SC. 2014. Communicating adaptation to climate change: the art and science of public engagement when climate change comes home. WIREs Climate Change 3:337–58 [Google Scholar]
  66. Myers T, Nisbet MC, Maibach EW, Leiserowitz AA. 2012. A public health frame arouses hopeful emotions about climate change. Climatic Change 113:1105–12 [Google Scholar]
  67. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine. 2016. Attribution of Extreme Weather Events in the Context of Climate Change. Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press [Google Scholar]
  68. Nisbet MC. 2011. Climate Shift: Clear Vision for the Next Decade of Public Debate. Washington, DC: Am. Univ. School Commun. [Google Scholar]
  69. O'Connor RE, Bord RJ, Fisher A. 1999. Risk perceptions, general environmental beliefs, and willingness to address climate change. Risk Anal 19:461–71 [Google Scholar]
  70. Opinion Research Corporation. 1981. ORC Public Opinion Index, March [survey question]. USORC.81MAY.R20 Ithaca, NY: Roper Cent. Public Opin. Res., Cornell Univ. [Google Scholar]
  71. Oreskes N, Conway EM. 2010. Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. New York: Bloomsbury [Google Scholar]
  72. Pew Research Center. 2016. Budget deficit slips as public priority Jan. 22. http://www.people-press.org/2016/01/22/budget-deficit-slips-as-public-priority
  73. Saad L, Jones JM. 2016. U.S. concern about global warming at eight-year high. Washington, DC: Gallup http://www.gallup.com/poll/190010/concern-global-warming-eight-year-high.aspx
  74. Schuldt JP, Roh S, Schwarz N. 2015. Questionnaire design effects in climate change surveys: implications for the partisan divide. ANNALS 658:67–85 [Google Scholar]
  75. Scruggs L, Benegal S. 2012. Declining public concern about climate change: Can we blame the great recession?. Glob. Environ. Change 22:505–15 [Google Scholar]
  76. Shao W, Keim BD, Garand JC, Hamilton LC. 2014. Weather, climate, and the economy: explaining risk perceptions of global warming, 2001–10. Weather Climate Soc 6:119–34 [Google Scholar]
  77. Shao W, Xian S, Keim BD, Goidel K, Lin N. 2017. Understanding perceptions of changing hurricane strength along the US Gulf Coast. Int. J. Climatol. In press. doi: 10.1002/joc.4805
  78. Shipan CR, Lowry WR. 2001. Environmental policy and party divergence in Congress. Polit. Res. Q. 54:245–63 [Google Scholar]
  79. Slovic P. 1999. Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: surveying the risk-assessment battlefield. Risk Anal 19:689–701 [Google Scholar]
  80. Stokes B, Wike R, Carle J. 2015. Global concern about climate change, broad support for limiting emissions Pew Res. Cent., Nov. 5. http://www.pewglobal.org/2015/11/05/global-concern-about-climate-change-broad-support-for-limiting-emissions
  81. Tingley D, Tomz M. 2013. Conditional cooperation and climate change. Comp. Polit. Stud. 20:1–25 [Google Scholar]
  82. Van der Linden SL, Leiserowitz AA, Feinberg GD, Maibach EW. 2015. The scientific consensus on climate change as a gateway belief: experimental evidence. PLOS ONE 10:1–8 [Google Scholar]
  83. Victor DG. 2011. Global Warming Gridlock: Creating More Effective Strategies for Protecting the Planet. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  84. Villar A, Krosnick JA. 2010. Global warming versus climate change, taxes versus prices: Does word choice matter. ? Climatic Change 105:1–12 [Google Scholar]
  85. Weber E. 2010. What shapes perceptions of climate change. ? Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Climate Change 1:332–42 [Google Scholar]
  86. Wiest SL, Raymond L, Clawson RA. 2015. Framing, partisan predispositions, and public opinion on climate change. Glob. Environ. Change 31:187–98 [Google Scholar]
  87. Wood BD, Vedlitz A. 2007. Issue definition, information processing, and the politics of global warming. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 51:552–68 [Google Scholar]
  88. Zaller JR. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  89. Zaval L, Keenan EA, Johnson EJ, Weber EU. 2014. How warm days increase belief in global warming. Nat. Climate Change 4:143–47 [Google Scholar]
  90. Zhou J. 2016. Boomerangs versus javelins: how polarization constrains communication on climate change. Environ. Polit. 25:788–811 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051215-022857
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051215-022857
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error