Comparing Political Values in China and the West: What Can Be Learned and Why It Matters

Literature Cited

1. Aden C, Bartels L. 2016. Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
2. Angle SC. 2012. Contemporary Confucian Political Philosophy Cambridge, UK: Polity [Google Scholar]
3. Bai T. 2013. A Confucian version of hybrid regime: How does it work and why is it superior?. See Bell & Li 2013 55–87
4. Balch O. 2013. Buen vivir: the social philosophy inspiring movements in South America. Guardian. Feb. 4. https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/blog/buen-vivir-philosophy-south-america-eduardo-gudynas [Google Scholar]
5. Beard M. 2015. SPQR: A History of Ancient Rome New York: Liveright [Google Scholar]
6. Bell DA. 2006. Beyond Liberal Democracy: Political Thinking for an East Asian Context Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
7. Bell DA. 2008. China's New Confucianism: Politics and Everyday Life in a Changing Society Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
8. Bell DA. 2015. The China Model: Political Meritocracy and the Limits of Democracy Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
9. Bell DA, de-Shalit A. 2013. The Spirit of Cities: Why the Identity of a City Matters in a Global Age Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
10. Bell DA, Li C. 2013. The East Asian Challenge for Democracy: Political Meritocracy in Comparative Perspective Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
11. Bell DA, Metz T. 2011. Confucianism and Ubuntu: reflections on a dialogue between Chinese and African traditions. J. Chin. Philos. 38:78–95 [Google Scholar]
12. Bell DA, Mo Y. 2014. Harmony in the world 2013: the ideal and the reality. Soc. Indic. Res. 118:2797–818 [Google Scholar]
13. Bell DA, Ziliotti E. 2014. Should voters be tested?. WorldPost Apr:14 [Google Scholar]
14. Bellah RN, Madsen R, Sullivan WM, Swidler A, Tipston SM. 1985. Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life Berkeley, CA: Univ. Calif. Press [Google Scholar]
15. Berggruen N, Gardels N. 2012. Intelligent Governance for the 21st Century: A Middle Way between East and West Cambridge, UK: Polity [Google Scholar]
16. Bevir M. 2010. Democratic Governance Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
17. Bhargava R. 2014. Beyond toleration: civility and principled co-existence in Asokan edicts. The Boundaries of Toleration A Stepan, C Taylor New York: Columbia Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
18. Brennan J. 2011. The Ethics of Voting Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
19. Burke E. 1999 (1790). Select Works of Edmund Burke 2 Reflections on the Revolution in France Indianapolis, IN: Lib. Fund [Google Scholar]
20. Caplan B. 2007. The Myth of the Rational Voter: Why Democracies Choose Bad Policies Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
21. Chan J. 2013. Political meritocracy and meritorious rule: a Confucian perspective. See Bell & Li 2013 31–54
22. Chan J. 2014. Confucian Perfectionism: A Political Philosophy for Modern Times Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
23. Chen AH. 2003. Mediation, litigation and justice: Confucian reflections in a modern liberal society. Confucianism for the Modern World DA Bell, C Hahm 257–87 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
24. Dallmayr F. 2010. Comparative Political Theory: An Introduction New York: Palgrave Macmillan [Google Scholar]
25. Donaldson S, Kymlicka W. 2011. Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
26. El Amine L. 2015. Classical Confucian Political Thought: A New Interpretation Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
27. Elman B. 2013. A society in motion: unexpected consequences of political meritocracy in pre-Imperial China. See Bell & Li 2013 203–31
28. Godrej F. 2011. Cosmopolitan Political Thought: Method, Practice, Discipline New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
29. Harari Y. 2015. Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind New York: Harper [Google Scholar]
30. He B. 2016. A discussion of Daniel A. Bell's The China Model: Political Meritocracy and the Limits of Democracy Perspect. Polit. 14:1147–49 [Google Scholar]
31. Helgesen G, Thomsen SR. 2006. Politics, Culture, and Self: East Asian and North European Attitudes Copenhagen: Nord. Inst. Asian Stud. [Google Scholar]
32. Huntington S. 2011. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order New York: Simon & Schuster [Google Scholar]
33. Jenco L. 2007. “What does heaven ever say?” A methods-centered approach to cross-cultural engagement. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 101:4741–55 [Google Scholar]
34. Jenco L. 2010. Making the Political: Founding and Action in the Political Theory of Zhang Shizhao New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
35. Jiang Q. 2012. A Confucian Constitutional Order: How China's Ancient Past Can Shape Its Political Future DA Bell, R Fan; Transl. E Ryden Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
36. Kennedy JA, Kim TW, Strudler A. 2016. Hierarchies and dignity: a Confucian communitarian approach. Bus. Ethics Q. 26:4479–502 [Google Scholar]
37. Lake D. 2009. Hierarchy in International Relations Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
38. Leavitt HJ. 2004. Top Down: Why Hierarchies Are Here to Stay and How to Manage Them More Effectively Cambridge, MA: Harv. Bus. Sch. Press [Google Scholar]
39. Li C. 2012. Equality and inequality in Confucianism. Dao 11:295–313 [Google Scholar]
40. Li C. 2014. The Confucian Philosophy of Harmony Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge [Google Scholar]
41. Li J. 2012. Cultural Foundations of Learning: East and West Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
42. Li J. 2016. Humility in learning: a Confucian perspective. J. Moral Educ. 45:147–65 [Google Scholar]
43. Macedo S. 2013. Meritocratic democracy: learning from the American experience. See Bell & Li 2013 232–58
44. Magee JC, Galinsky AD. 2008. Social hierarchy: the self-reinforcing nature of power and status. Acad. Manag. Ann. 2:351–98 [Google Scholar]
45. Mann M. 2005. The Dark Side of Democracy: Explaining Ethnic Cleansing Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
46. Metz T. 2016. Confucian harmony from an African perspective. Afr. Asian Stud. 15:1–22 [Google Scholar]
47. Metz T. 2017. Values in China as compared to Africa: two conceptions of harmony. Philos. East West 67:2 In press [Google Scholar]
48. Meyer E. 2014. The Culture Map: Decoding How People Think, Lead, and Get Things Done Across Cultures New York: Public Aff. [Google Scholar]
49. Mochari I. 2014. The case for hierarchy. Inc.com Jan. 15. http://www.inc.com/ilan-mochari/case-for-hierarchy.html [Google Scholar]
50. Mulgan T. 2011. Ethics for a Broken World: Imagining Philosophy after Catastrophe Montreal, Can: McGill-Queen's Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
51. Nisbett RE. 2003. The Geography of Thought: How Asians and Westerners Think Differently…and Why New York: Free Press [Google Scholar]
52. Pettit P. 2013. Meritocratic representation. See Bell & Li 2013 138–60
53. Pines Y. 2013. Between merit and pedigree: evolution of the concept of “elevating the worthy” in pre-Imperial China. See Bell & Li 2013 161–202
54. Puett M. 2014. Ritual disjunctions: ghosts, philosophy, and anthropology. The Ground Between: Anthropologists Engage Philosophy V Das, MD Jackson, A Kleinman, B Singh 218–33 Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
55. Rachman G. 2016. Easternisation: War and Peace in the Asian Century London: Bodley Head [Google Scholar]
56. Rawls J. 1999. A Theory of Justice Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press [Google Scholar]
57. Shanahan M. 2015. The Technological Singularity Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
58. Shi T. 2015. The Cultural Logic of Politics in Mainland China and Taiwan Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
59. Shin DC. 2011. Confucianism and Democratization in East Asia Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
60. Shin DC. 2013. How East Asians view meritocracy: a Confucian perspective. See Bell & Li 2013 259–87
61. Singer P. 1973. Animal liberation. New York Rev. Books Apr. 5 [Google Scholar]
62. Singer P, Dawn K. 2016. Harambe the gorilla dies, meat-eaters grieve. Op-Ed. Los Angeles Times June 5 [Google Scholar]
63. Skorupski J. 2013. The liberal critique of democracy. See Bell & Li 2013 116–37
64. Sun YS. 1994. Prescriptions for Saving China: Selected Writings of Sun Yan-sen J Wei, R Myers, D Gillin; Transl. J Wei, E Zen, L Chao Stanford, CA: Hoover Inst. Press [Google Scholar]
65. Tan SH. 2004. Confucian Democracy: A Deweyan Reconstruction Albany, NY: State Univ. New York Press [Google Scholar]
66. Taylor M. 1996. Good government: on hierarchy, social capital, and the limitations of rational choice theory. J. Polit. Philos. 4:11–28 [Google Scholar]
67. Thaler RH, Sunstein CR. 2009. Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness New York: Penguin [Google Scholar]
68. Tiwald J. 2012. Xunzi on moral expertise. Dao 11:3275–93 [Google Scholar]
69. von Vacano D. 2015. The scope of comparative political theory. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 18:465–80 [Google Scholar]
70. Walzer M. 1983. Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality Oxford: Basil Blackwell [Google Scholar]
71. Walzer M. 1994. Thick and Thin: Moral Argument at Home and Abroad Notre Dame, IN: Univ. Notre Dame Press [Google Scholar]
72. Wong DB. 2011. Agon and Hé: contest and harmony. Ethics in Early China: An Anthology C Fraser, D Robins, T O'Leary 197–216 Hong Kong: Hong Kong Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
73. Xiao H, Li C. 2013. China's meritocratic examinations and the ideal of virtuous talents. See Bell & Li 2013 340–62
74. Yan X. 2011. Ancient Chinese Thought, Modern Chinese Power DA Bell, Z Sun, Transl. E Ryden Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
75. Yan Y. 2002. Unbalanced reciprocity: asymmetrical gift giving and social hierarchy in rural China. The Question of the Gift: Essays Across Disciplines M Osteen 67–84 London: Routledge [Google Scholar]
76. Yao Y. 2013. The disinterested government: an interpretation of China's economic success in the reform era. Achieving Development Success: Strategies and Lessons from the Developing World AK Fosu 152–75 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
77. Yearley LH. 1990. Mencius and Aquinas: Theories of Virtue and Conceptions of Courage Albany, NY: State Univ. New York Press [Google Scholar]
78. Zhang T. 2014. Social hierarchies and the formation of customary property law in pre-industrial China and England. Am. J. Comp. Law 62:171–210 [Google Scholar]
79. Zheng Y. 2010. The Chinese Communist Party as Organizational Emperor: Culture, Reproduction and Transformation London: Routledge [Google Scholar]
80. Zitek EM, Tiedens LZ. 2012. The fluency of social hierarchy: the ease with which hierarchical relationships are seen, remembered, learned, and liked. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 102:198–115 [Google Scholar]