1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Political Science
  4. Volume 18, 2015
  5. Article

Annual Review of Political Science

Volume 18, 2015

Political Theory as Both Philosophy and History: A Defense Against Methodological Militancy

Abstract

This essay defends a broad, eclectic, and inclusive kind of political theory against methodological militants who would restrict political theory's permissible purview. It rejects the idea—frequently voiced by exponents of both analytic-philosophic and historicist methodologies—that philosophical and historical analyses are necessarily two separate enterprises that ought to be kept distinct, not just conceptually but as a matter of scholarly practice. Against the methodological militants, this essay explains the value of those forms of political theory that combine philosophy (the study of what should be done) with history (the study of what past authors thought about politics). It concludes by raising one further objection to the methodological militants: They fail to acknowledge the reality and importance of the “classic” work within the study of political thought.

Keyword(s): analytic philosophy, canon, classics, eclecticism, historicism, methodology
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051713-123049
2015-05-11
2024-10-03
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/polisci/18/1/annurev-polisci-051713-123049.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051713-123049&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Arendt H. 1951. The Origins of Totalitarianism New York: Harcourt Brace Janovich [Google Scholar]
  2. Arendt H. 1958. The Human Condition Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  3. Arendt H. 1963. On Revolution New York: Viking [Google Scholar]
  4. Arendt H. 1968. Men in Dark Times New York: Harcourt Brace Janovich [Google Scholar]
  5. Arendt H. 1971. Thinking and moral considerations. Soc. Res. 38.3:417–46 [Google Scholar]
  6. Arendt H. 2000 (1964). “What remains? The language remains”: a conversation with Günther Gaus. The Portable Hannah Arendt3–23 New York: Penguin [Google Scholar]
  7. Bederman D. 2008. The Classical Foundations of the American Constitution Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  8. Berlin I. 1979. Two concepts of liberty. Four Essays on Liberty118–72 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  9. Bevir M. 1999. The Logic of the History of Ideas Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  10. Bevir M. 1994. Are there perennial problems in political theory?. Polit. Stud. 42:662–75 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bevir M. 2011. The contextual approach. The Oxford Handbook of the History of Political Philosophy11–23 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  12. Broad CD. 1930. Five Types of Ethical Theory London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner [Google Scholar]
  13. Calvino I. 1999. Why Read the Classics? New York: Pantheon [Google Scholar]
  14. Coetzee JM. 2001. What is a classic?. Stranger Shores: Essays 1986–19991–16 London: Vintage [Google Scholar]
  15. Cottingham J. 2005. Why should analytic philosophers do history of philosophy?. Analytic Philosophy and History of Philosophy25–41 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  16. Darwall S. 2002. Virtue Ethics Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell [Google Scholar]
  17. Dummett M. 1994. Origins of Analytical Philosophy Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  18. Dunn J. 1969. The Political Thought of John Locke Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  19. Dunn J. 1980. Political Obligation in Its Historical Context Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  20. Dunn J. 1990. Interpreting Political Responsibility Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  21. Dunn J. 1996. The History of Political Theory and Other Essays Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  22. Dunn J. 2005. Setting the People Free: The Story of Democracy London: Atlantic Books [Google Scholar]
  23. Dworkin R. 1977. Taking Rights Seriously Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  24. Føllesdall D. 1999. Analytic philosophy: What is it and why should one engage in it?. Rise of Analytic Philosophy H-J Glock 1–16 Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell [Google Scholar]
  25. Frazer ML. 2013. The ethics of interpretation in political theory and intellectual history. Presented at Annu. Meet. South. Polit. Sci. Assoc., Orlando, FL [Google Scholar]
  26. Gadamer HG. 1989. Truth and Method New York: Continuum, 2nd ed.. [Google Scholar]
  27. Green JE. 2004. The morality of wonder. Polis 21.1–2:43–69 [Google Scholar]
  28. Green JE. 2012. On the difference between a pupil and a historian of ideas. J. Philos. Hist. 6.1:86–112 [Google Scholar]
  29. Habermas J. 1985. The Theory of Communicative Action 2 vols. Boston: Beacon [Google Scholar]
  30. Habermas J. 1991. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  31. Hankins J. 1999. Humanism and the origins of modern political thought. The Cambridge Companion to Renaissance Humanism J Kraye 118–41 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  32. Hart HLA. 2012. The Concept of Law New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 3rd ed.. [Google Scholar]
  33. Harvey D. 2010. The Enigma of Capital and the Crises of Capitalism New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  34. Kant I. 1999 (1786). What does it mean to orient oneself in thinking?. Religion Within the Boundaries of Mere Reason and Other Writings1–14 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  35. Kant I. 2002 (1781). Prolegomena to any future metaphysics that will be able to come forward as science. Theoretical Philosophy After 178129–170 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  36. Kant I. 2007 (1781). Critique of Pure Reason. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2nd ed.. [Google Scholar]
  37. Leslie M. 1970. In defense of anachronism. Polit. Stud. 18.4:433–47 [Google Scholar]
  38. Lockyear A. 1979. Tradition and context in the history of political theory. Polit. Stud. 27.2:201–17 [Google Scholar]
  39. Machiavelli N. 1996 (1517). Discourses on Livy Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  40. Machiavelli N. 1998 (1513). The Prince Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  41. Mill JS. 1986 (1854). The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill XIV AP Robson, JM Robson Toronto: Univ. Toronto Press [Google Scholar]
  42. Nozick R. 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia New York: Basic Books [Google Scholar]
  43. Parfit D. 2011. On What Matters 2 New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  44. Pettit P. 1997. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  45. Plato 1992. Republic Indianapolis: Hackett [Google Scholar]
  46. Pocock JGA. 1980. Political ideas as historical events: political philosophers as historical actors. Reprinted in Pocock 2009 511–66
  47. Pocock JGA. 1987. Texts as events: reflections on the history of political thought. Reprinted in Pocock 2009 106–21
  48. Pocock JGA. 1996. The historian as political actor in polity, society and academy. Reprinted in Pocock 2009 217–38
  49. Pocock JGA. 2004. Quentin Skinner: the history of politics and the politics of history. Reprinted in Pocock 2009 123–44
  50. Pocock JGA. 2009. Political Thought and History: Essays on Theory and Method Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  51. Price HH. 1940. Hume's Theory of the External World Oxford, UK: Clarendon [Google Scholar]
  52. Rawls J. 1971. A Theory of Justice Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  53. Richard C. 1994. The Founders and the Classics Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  54. Rubenstein R. 2003. Aristotle's Children: How Christians, Muslims, and Jews Rediscovered Ancient Wisdom and Illuminated the Dark Ages San Diego: Harcourt [Google Scholar]
  55. Russell B. 1992 (1900). A Critical Exposition of the Philosophy of Leibniz London: Routledge, 3rd ed.. [Google Scholar]
  56. Sanches F. 1988 (1581). That Nothing is Known [Quod Nihil Scitur] D Thomson, E Limbrick Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  57. Skinner Q. 1988 (1969). Meaning and understanding in the history of ideas. Meaning & Context: Quentin Skinner and His Critics J Tully 29–67 Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  58. Skinner Q. 1988 (1974). Some problems in the analysis of political thought and action. Meaning & Context: Quentin Skinner and His Critics J Tully 97–118 Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. [Google Scholar]
  59. Skinner Q. 1998. Liberty Before Liberalism Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  60. Skinner Q. 2002a. A third concept of liberty. Proc. Br. Acad. 117:237–68 [Google Scholar]
  61. Skinner Q. 2002b. Visions of Politics, Volume 1: Regarding Method Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  62. Skinner Q. 2008. A genealogy of the modern state. Proc. Br. Acad. 162:325–70 [Google Scholar]
  63. Sorell T. 2005a. Introduction. Analytic Philosophy and History of Philosophy. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  64. Sorell T. 2005b. On saying no to history of philosophy. Analytic Philosophy and History of Philosophy Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  65. Spanos W. 1999. America's Shadow: An Anatomy of Empire Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press [Google Scholar]
  66. Strauss L. 1953. Natural Right and History Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  67. Strauss L. 1973. What is Political Philosophy? and Other Studies New York: Praeger [Google Scholar]
  68. Thucydides 1972. The War of the Peloponnesians and the Athenians Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  69. Tocqueville A. 2000 (1835, 1840). Democracy in America 2 vols Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  70. Tocqueville A. 1955 (1856). The Old Regime and the French Revolution. New York: Doubleday [Google Scholar]
  71. Weber M. 2004 (1919). Politics as a vocation. Vocation Lectures32–94 Indianapolis: Hackett [Google Scholar]
  72. Zizek S. 1989. The Sublime Object of Ideology London: Verso [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051713-123049
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error