1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Political Science
  4. Volume 26, 2023
  5. Article

Annual Review of Political Science

Volume 26, 2023

The Economic Backgrounds of Politicians

Abstract

Research on the economic backgrounds of politicians is once again flourishing in political science. In this article, we describe the economic characteristics that scholars have recently studied and the common threads that have emerged in modern work on this topic. This growing literature is largely united by a shared concern about the unequal economic makeup of institutions: Recent studies generally agree that politicians tend to be vastly better off than citizens on every economic measure and that politicians from different economic backgrounds tend to think and behave differently in office. However, the literature is far from a consensus regarding why politicians are so economically advantaged. Going forward, there are numerous opportunities for future work to address this gap; to extend the literature to new countries, institutions, and time periods; and to better understand how economic backgrounds intersect with race, gender, and other social characteristics.

Keyword(s): class, education, political elites, representation, wealth
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051921-102946
2023-06-15
2024-05-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/polisci/26/1/annurev-polisci-051921-102946.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051921-102946&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Achen CH. 2002. Toward a new political methodology: microfoundations and ART. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 5:423–50
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Adams BE, Lascher EL Jr., Martin DJ. 2020. Ballot cues, business candidates, and voter choices in local elections. Am. Politics Res. 49:2186–97
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Adolph C. 2013. Bankers, Bureaucrats, and Central Bank Politics: The Myth of Neutrality New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  4. Albaugh QM. 2020. Do voters discriminate against working-class candidates? Evidence from fifty years of self-reported candidate occupations Work. Pap., https://www.qalbaugh.com/s/Albaugh_Voter_Class_Bias.pdf
  5. Alexiadou D. 2022. Cabinet ministers and inequality. Eur. J. Political Res. 61:2326–50
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Arnesen S, Duell D, Johannesson MP. 2019. Do citizens make inferences from political candidate characteristics when aiming for substantive representation?. Elect. Stud. 57:46–60
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Arnesen S, Peters Y. 2018. The legitimacy of representation: how descriptive, formal, and responsiveness representation affect the acceptability of political decisions. Comp. Political Stud. 51:7868–99
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Bailer S, Breunig C, Giger N, Wüst AM. 2022. The diminishing value of representing the disadvantaged: between group representation and individual career paths. Br. J. Political Sci. 52:535–52
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Barnes TD, Beall VD, Holman MR. 2020. Pink-collar representation and budgetary outcomes in US states. Legis. Stud. Q. 46:1119–54
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Barnes TD, Saxton GW. 2019. Working-class legislators and perceptions of representation in Latin America. Political Res. Q. 72:4910–28
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Bartels LM. 2016. Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press. , 2nd ed..
  12. Beach B, Jones DB. 2016. Business as usual: politicians with business experience, government finances, and policy outcomes. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 131:297–307
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Becher M, Stegmueller D. 2020. Reducing unequal representation: the impact of labor unions on legislative responsiveness in the U.S. Congress. Perspect. Politics 19:192–109
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Bernhard R, Shames S, Teele DL. 2021. To emerge? Breadwinning, motherhood, and women's decisions to run for office. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 115:2379–94
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Besley T, Montalvo JG, Reynal-Querol M. 2011. Do educated leaders matter?. Econ. J. 121:554205–27
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Best H. 1985. Biography and political behavior: determinants of parliamentary decision-making in mid-nineteenth century Germany, France, and Great Britain. Hist. Soc. Res. 33:71–91
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Best H, Cotta M, eds. 2000. Parliamentary Representatives in Europe 1848–2000 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  18. Bonica A. 2020. Why are there so many lawyers in Congress?. Legis. Stud. Q. 45:2253–89
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Borwein S. 2021. Do ministers’ occupational and social class backgrounds influence social spending?. Politics Groups Ident. 10:4558–80
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Bovens M, Wille AC. 2017. Diploma Democracy: The Rise of Political Meritocracy Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  21. Bueno NS, Dunning T. 2017. Race, resources, and representation: evidence from Brazilian politicians. World Politics 69:2327–65
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Burden BC. 2007. The Personal Roots of Representation Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  23. Campbell R, Cowley P. 2014. What voters want: reactions to candidate characteristics in a survey experiment. Political Stud. 62:4745–65
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Carnes N. 2012. Does the underrepresentation of the working class in Congress matter?. Legis. Stud. Q. 37:15–34
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Carnes N. 2013. White-Collar Government: The Hidden Role of Class in Economic Policy Making. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  26. Carnes N. 2018. The Cash Ceiling: Why Only the Rich Run for Office—And What We Can Do About It. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Carnes N. 2020. Has research on working-class politicians excluded women? A response to Barnes, Beall, and Holman Work. Pap. Duke Univ. http://people.duke.edu/∼nwc8/Carnes_Response.pdf
  28. Carnes N, Hansen E. 2016. Does paying politicians more promote economic diversity in legislatures?. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 110:4699–716
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Carnes N, Lupu N. 2015. Rethinking the comparative perspective on class and representation: evidence from Latin America. Am. J. Political Sci. 59:11–18
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Carnes N, Lupu N. 2016a. Do voters dislike working-class candidates? Voter biases and the descriptive underrepresentation of the working class. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 110:4832–44
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Carnes N, Lupu N. 2016b. What good is a college degree? Education and leader quality reconsidered. J. Politics 78:135–49
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Carnes N, Lupu N. 2022a. Are there social class gaps in nascent political ambition? Survey evidence from the Americas Work. Pap., https://noamlupu.com/Carnes_Lupu_ambition.pdf
  33. Carnes N, Lupu N 2022b. What do voters think about the descriptive underrepresentation of the working class?. Contested Representation: Challenges, Shortcomings and Reforms C Landwehr, T Saalfeld, A Schäfer 165–83. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Carnes N, Lupu N. 2022c. Working-class officeholding in the OECD Work. Pap., https://noamlupu.com/Carnes_Lupu_OECD.pdf
  35. Carreri M, Payson J. 2021. What makes a good local leader? Evidence from U.S. mayors and city managers. J. Political Inst. Political Econ. 2:2199–225
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Carreri M, Teso E. 2021. Economic recessions and congressional preferences for redistribution. Rev. Econ. Stat. In press. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_01053
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Courtney M. 2015. Social background and intra-party attitudes in Ireland. Irish Political Stud. 30:2178–98
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Curto-Grau M, Gallego A. 2021. How do the educated govern? Evidence from Spanish mayors Work. Pap., http://www.ainagallego.org/uploads/7/1/4/3/7143414/curto_and_gallego_manuscript.pdf
  39. Dal Bó E, Finan F, Folke O, Persson T, Rickne J. 2017. Who becomes a politician?. Q. J. Econ. 132:41877–914
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Dodeigne J, Teuber F 2018. The effects of the political parties’ selective bias on descriptive representation: analysis of the candidates’ sociological and political background. Candidates, Parties, and Voters in the Belgian Partitocracy A Vandeleene, L De Winter, P Baudewyns 47–76. London: Palgrave Macmillan
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Domhoff GW. 1967. Who Rules America? Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
  42. Durose C, Richardson L, Combs R, Eason C, Gains F. 2013. ‘Acceptable difference’: diversity, representation and pathways to UK politics. Parliament. Aff. 66:2246–67
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Edinger LJ, Searing DD. 1967. Social background in elite analysis: a methodological inquiry. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 61:2428–45
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Eggers AC, Klašnja M. 2018. Wealth, fundraising, and voting in the U.S. Congress Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association Aug. 30–Sept. 2 Boston, MA:
  45. Elsässer L, Hense S, Schäfer A. 2021. Not just money: unequal responsiveness in egalitarian democracies. J. Eur. Public Policy 28:1890–908
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Erikson J, Josefsson C. 2019. Does higher education matter for MPs in their parliamentary work? Evidence from the Swedish Parliament. Representation 5:165–80
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Evans G. 2000. The continued significance of class voting. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 3:401–17
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Evans G, Tilley J. 2017. The New Politics of Class: The Political Exclusion of the British Working Class New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  49. Feigenbaum J, Hertel-Fernandez A, Williamson V. 2019. From the bargaining table to the ballot box: political effects of right to work laws NBER Work Pap. 24259. https://www.nber.org/papers/w24259
  50. Fiva JH, Nedregård O, Øien H. 2022. Polarization in party-centered environments: evidence from parliamentary debates Work. Pap., https://www.jon.fiva.no/docs/FivaNedregardOien.pdf
  51. Fox RL, Lawless JL. 2005. To run or not to run for office: explaining nascent political ambition. Am. J. Political Sci. 49:3642–59
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Fuhrmann M. 2020. When do leaders free-ride? Business experience and contributions to collective defense. Am. J. Political Sci. 64:2416–31
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Gift T, Lastra-Anadón CX. 2018. How voters assess elite-educated politicians: a survey experiment. Elect. Stud. 56:136–49
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Giger N, Rosset J, Bernauer J. 2012. The poor representation of the poor in a comparative perspective. Representation 48:47–61
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Gilens M. 2012. Affluence and Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  56. Griffin JD, Anewalt-Remsburg C. 2013. Legislator wealth and the effort to repeal the estate tax. Am. Politics Res. 41:4599–622
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Griffin JD, Newman B, Buhr P. 2019. Class war in the voting booth: bias against high-income congressional candidates. Legis. Stud. Q. 45:1131–45
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Gruber W. 1971. Career patterns of Mexico's political elite. West. Political Q. 24:3467–82
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Grumbach JM. 2015. Does the American dream matter for members of Congress? Social-class backgrounds and roll-call votes. Political Res. Q. 68:2306–23
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Gulzar S. 2021. Who enters politics and why?. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 24:253–75
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Hakhverdian A. 2015. Does it matter that most representatives are higher educated?. Swiss Political Sci. Rev. 21:2237–45.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Han SM, Han K. 2021. Political leaders, economic hardship, and redistribution in democracies: impact of political leaders on welfare policy. Political Stud. 69:4921–43
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Hansen E, Clark CJ. 2020. Diversity in party leadership in state legislatures. State Politics Policy Q. 20:181–107
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Hayes BC. 1995. The impact of class on political attitudes: a comparative study of Great Britain, West Germany, Australia, and the United States. Eur. J. Political Res. 27:69–91
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Heath O. 2016. Policy alienation, social alienation and working-class abstention in Britain, 1964–2010. Br. J. Political Sci. 48:41053–73
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Hemingway A. 2022. Does class shape legislators’ approach to inequality and economic policy? A comparative view. Gov. Oppos. 57:84–107
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Horiuchi Y, Smith DM, Yamamoto T. 2018. Identifying voter preferences for politicians’ personal attributes: a conjoint experiment in Japan. Political Sci. Res. Methods 8:175–91
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Hout M, Manza J, Brooks C. 1995. The democratic class struggle in the United States, 1948–1992. Am. Sociol. Rev. 60:805–28
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Hoyt CL, DeShields BH. 2020. How social-class background influences perceptions of political leaders. Political Psychol. 42:2239–63
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Int. Labor Organ 2020. Employment by sex and occupation. https://tinyurl.com/khzhmswx
  71. Joshi DK. 2020. Lawyers and law graduates in parliaments as a consequence of SMD electoral systems: a comparison of Japan, South Korea, and Germany. Japan. J. Political Sci. 21:119–30
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Keely LC, Tan CM. 2008. Understanding preferences for income redistribution. J. Public Econ. 92:944–61
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Kevins A. 2021. Race, class, or both? Responses to candidate characteristics in Canada, the UK, and the US. Politics Groups Ident. 9:4699–720
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Kilborn M. 2018. Public campaign financing, candidate socioeconomic diversity, and representational inequality at the U.S. state level: evidence from Connecticut. State Politics Policy Q. 18:3296–323
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Kim CL, Woo B. 1972. Political representation in the Korean National Assembly. Midwest J. Political Sci. 16:4626–51
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Kingdon JW. 2011. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies Boston: Little and Brown
  77. Kirkland PA. 2021. Business owners and executives as politicians: the effect on public policy. J. Politics 83:41652–68
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Korpi W. 1983. The Democratic Class Struggle London: Routledge
  79. Kraus MW, Callaghan B. 2014. Noblesse oblige? Social status and economic inequality maintenance among politicians. PLOS ONE 10:2e0117892
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Krcmaric D, Nelson SC, Roberts A. 2020. Studying leaders and elites: the personal biography approach. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 23:133–51
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Lamare JR. 2015. Union experience and worker policy: legislative behavior in California, 1999–2012. ILR Rev. 69:1113–41
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Lamprinakou C, Morucci M, Campbell R, van Heerde-Hudson J. 2017. All change in the house? The profile of candidates and MPs in the 2015 British General Election. Parliament. Aff. 70:2207–32
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Lipset SM, Solari A, eds. 1967. Elites in Latin America Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  84. Lovenduski J. 2016. The supply and demand model of candidate selection: some reflections. Gov. Oppos. 51:3513–28
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Lupu N, Tirado Castro A. 2022. Unequal policy responsiveness in Spain. Socio-Econ. Rev. 2022:mwac040
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Lupu N, Warner Z. 2022a. Affluence and congruence: unequal representation around the world. J. Politics 84:1276–90
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Lupu N, Warner Z. 2022b. Why are the affluent better represented around the world?. Eur. J. Political Res. 61:167–85
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Makse T. 2019. Professional backgrounds in state legislatures, 1993–2012. State Politics Policy Q. 19:3312–33
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Makse T. 2022. Instant credibility: the conditional role of professional background in policymaking success. Political Res. Q. 75:1118–33
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Manza J, Brooks C 2008. Classes and politics. Social Class: How Does It Work? A Lareau, D Conley 201–31. New York: Russell Sage Found.
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Matthews AS, Kerevel YP. 2022. The nomination and electoral competitiveness of working class candidates in Germany. German Politics 31:3459–75
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Matthews DR. 1954. The Social Background of Political Decision-Makers New York: Doubleday
  93. Matthews DR 1985. Legislative recruitment and legislative careers. Handbook of Legislative Research G Loewenberg, SC Patterson, ME Jewell 17–56. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Meltzer A, Richard S 1981. A rational theory of the size of government. J. Political Econ. 89:914–27
     [Google Scholar]
  95. Meriläinen J. 2022. Political selection and economic policy. Econ. J. 132:6483020–46
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Micozzi JP. 2018. Division or union of labor? Analyzing workers’ representation in the Argentine Congress. Latin Am. Politics Soc. 60:493–112
     [Google Scholar]
  97. Murray R. 2023. It's a rich man's world: how class and glass ceilings intersect for UK parliamentary candidates. Int. Political Sci. Rev. 44:113–26
     [Google Scholar]
  98. Norris P, Lovenduski J. 1993. If only more candidates came forward: supply-side explanations of candidate selection in Britain. Br. J. Political Sci. 23:3373–408
     [Google Scholar]
  99. Norris P, Lovenduski J. 1995. Political Recruitment: Gender, Race, and Class in the British Parliament New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  100. O'Grady T. 2018. Careerists versus coal-miners: welfare reforms and the substantive representation of social groups in the British Labour Party. Comp. Political Stud. 52:4544–78
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Osei A. 2021. Post-conflict democratisation in Sierra Leone: the role of the Parliament. J. Legis. Stud. 27:1112–35
     [Google Scholar]
  102. Pedersen RT, Dahlgaard JO, Citi M. 2019. Voter reactions to candidate background characteristics depend on candidate policy positions. Elect. Stud. 61:102066
     [Google Scholar]
  103. Persson M. 2021. From opinions to policies: examining the links between citizens, representatives, and policy change. Elect. Stud. 74:102413
     [Google Scholar]
  104. Piketty T. 1995. Social mobility and redistributive politics. Q. J. Econ. 110:551–84
     [Google Scholar]
  105. Pilotti A. 2015. The historical changes and continuities of Swiss parliamentary recruitment. Swiss Political Sci. Rev. 21:2246–53
     [Google Scholar]
  106. Prewitt K, Eulau H, Zisk BH. 1966. Political socialization and political roles. Public Opin. Q. 30:4569–82
     [Google Scholar]
  107. Putnam RD. 1976. The Comparative Study of Political Elites Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
  108. Rehmert J. 2022. Party elites’ preferences in candidates: evidence from a conjoint experiment. Political Behav. 44:1149–73
     [Google Scholar]
  109. Rossi MA. 2014. The impact of individual wealth on posterior political power. J. Econ. Behav. 106:469–80
     [Google Scholar]
  110. Schakel W. 2021. Unequal policy responsiveness in the Netherlands. Socio-Econ. Rev. 19:37–57
     [Google Scholar]
  111. Searing DD. 1969. The comparative study of elite socialization. Comp. Political Stud. 1:4471–500
     [Google Scholar]
  112. Sevi S, Blais A, Mayer D. 2020. Do lawyers get more votes?. Am. Rev. Can. Stud. 50:2216–28
     [Google Scholar]
  113. Shorette K, Thiele M, Bolzendahl C. 2021. Degrees of support: state spending on higher education and public postsecondary degrees across state legislatures, 2005 and 2014. Socius 7:
     [Google Scholar]
  114. Sojourner AJ. 2013. Do unions promote members' electoral office holding? Evidence from correlates of state legislatures' occupational shares. ILR Rev. 66:2467–86
     [Google Scholar]
  115. Stacy D. 2020. Wealth and policymaking in the U.S. House of Representatives Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association Sept. 9–13, virtual
  116. Szakonyi D. 2021. Private sector policy making: business background and politicians’ behavior in office. J. Politics 83:1260–76
     [Google Scholar]
  117. Thompson DM, Feigenbaum JJ, Hall AB, Yoder J. 2019. Who becomes a member of Congress? Evidence from de-anonymized census data NBER Work. Pap. 26156. https://www.nber.org/papers/w26156
  118. Verner JG. 1974. Educational backgrounds of Latin American legislators: a three-country analysis. Comp. Politics 6:4617–34
     [Google Scholar]
  119. Verniers G, Jaffrelot C. 2020. The reconfiguration of India's political elite: profiling the 17th Lok Sabha. Contemp. South Asia 28:2242–54
     [Google Scholar]
  120. Vivyan N, Wagner M, Glinitzer K, Eberl J. 2020. Do humble beginnings help? How politician class roots shape voter evaluations. Elect. Stud. 63:1–13
     [Google Scholar]
  121. Volden C, Wai J, Wiseman AE. 2020. Elite education and legislative behavior in the U.S. Congress Work. Pap. Cent. Eff. Lawmaking https://thelawmakers.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Working-Paper-CEL-Elite-Education-and-Legislative-Effectiveness-1.pdf
  122. Von der Mehden FR. 1969. Politics of the Developing Nations Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. , 2nd ed..
  123. Warburton E, Muhtadi B, Aspinall E, Fossati D. 2021. When does class matter? Unequal representation in Indonesian legislatures. Third World Q. 42:61252–75
     [Google Scholar]
  124. Wauters B. 2012. Blue collars striking the red flag: formal and descriptive representation of the working class in the Belgian House of Representatives 1946–2007. Labor Hist. 53:2225–43
     [Google Scholar]
  125. Wüest R, Helfer L, Varone F. 2019. Alike think alike? The effect of shared class background on policy preference congruence between citizens and legislators Work. Pap., https://retowuest.net/papers/wueest-etal-opinion-congr-2019.pdf
  126. Wüest R, Pontusson J. 2022. Voter preferences as a source of descriptive (mis)representation by social class. Eur. J. Political Res. 61:2398–419
     [Google Scholar]
  127. Wüest R, Rosset J. 2019. Legislator income, policy attitudes, and voting behavior Work. Pap., https://retowuest.net/papers/wueest-rosset-leg-income-2019.pdf
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051921-102946
Loading
The Economic Backgrounds of Politicians
Annual Review of Political Science 26, 253 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051921-102946
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051921-102946
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051921-102946
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error