1932

Abstract

This article reviews the burgeoning literature on democratic authoritarianism, which examines two related but distinct questions: why authoritarian regimes adopt institutions conventionally associated with democracy, and how these institutions strengthen authoritarian regimes and forestall democratization. The literature suggests that authoritarian regimes adopt and utilize nominally democratic institutions to augment their strength through five main mechanisms: signaling, information acquisition, patronage distribution, monitoring, and credible commitment. After evaluating each of these mechanisms, I discuss the empirical challenges facing this research agenda and suggest how the field should proceed to overcome these challenges.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-052013-115248
2014-05-11
2024-04-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/polisci/17/1/annurev-polisci-052013-115248.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-052013-115248&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Bates R. 1988. Contra contractarianism: some reflections on the new institutionalism. Polit. Soc. 16:2/3387–401 [Google Scholar]
  2. Berman S. 1997. Civil society and the collapse of the Weimar Republic. World Polit. 49:3401–29 [Google Scholar]
  3. Blaydes L. 2011. Elections and Distributive Politics in Mubarak's Egypt New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  4. Boix C. 2003. Democracy and Redistribution New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  5. Brancati D. 2013. Pocketbook protests: explaining the emergence of pro-democracy protests worldwide. Comp. Polit. Stud. doi: 10.1177/0010414013512603
  6. Brancati D, Snyder JL. 2011. Rushing to the polls: the causes of early post-conflict elections. J. Confl. Resolut. 55:3469–92 [Google Scholar]
  7. Brownlee J. 2007. Authoritarianism in an Age of Democratization New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  8. Bunce VJ, Wolchik SL. 2010. Electoral change and stability in competitive authoritarian regimes. World Polit. 62:143–86 [Google Scholar]
  9. Calvo E, Murillo MV. 2004. Who delivers? Partisan clients in the Argentine electoral market. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 48:4742–57 [Google Scholar]
  10. Collier P, Hoeffler A. 2002. On the incidence of civil war in Africa. J. Confl. Resolut. 46:113–28 [Google Scholar]
  11. Cox G. 2009. Authoritarian elections and leadership succession Presented at Annu. Meet. Am. Polit. Sci. Assoc., Sep. 3–6, Toronto
  12. Djankov S, Montalvo JG, Reynal-Querol M. 2008. The curse of aid. J. Econ. Growth 13:3169–94 [Google Scholar]
  13. Egorov G, Guriev S, Sonin K. 2006. Media freedom, bureaucratic incentives, and the resource curse Center for Democracy, Development and the Rule of Law (CDDRL) Work. Pap. No. 71, Stanford Univ.
  14. Fearon JD, Laitin DD. 2003. Ethnicity, insurgency and civil war. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 97:175–90 [Google Scholar]
  15. Gandhi J. 2008. Political Institutions under Dictatorship New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  16. Gandhi J, Przeworski A. 2007. Authoritarian institutions and the survival of autocrats. Comp. Polit. Stud. 40:111279–301 [Google Scholar]
  17. Geddes B. 2006. Why parties and elections in authoritarian regimes? Unpublished manuscript
  18. Gehlbach S, Keefer P. 2012. Private investments and the institutionalization of collective action in autocracies: ruling parties and legislatures. J. Polit. 74:2621–35 [Google Scholar]
  19. Ginsburg T, Simpser A. 2013. Constitutions in Authoritarian Regimes New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
  20. Jensen N, Malesky E, Weymouth S. 2013. Unbundling the relationship between authoritarian legislatures and political risk. Br. J. Polit. Sci. available on CJ02013. doi: 10.1017/S0007123412000774
  21. King G, Pan J, Roberts ME. 2013. How censorship in China allows government criticism but silences collective expression. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 107:2326–43 [Google Scholar]
  22. Lee J-Y, Mansfield E. 1996. Intellectual property rights protection and US foreign direct investment. Rev. Econ. Stat. 78:2181–86 [Google Scholar]
  23. Levitsky S, Way LA. 2010. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  24. Lorentzen P. 2009. Deliberately incomplete press censorship Unpublished manuscript
  25. Lust-Okar E. 2008. Competitive clientelism in Jordanian elections. Political Participation in the Middle East and North Africa E Lust-Okar, S Zerhouni 75–94 Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner [Google Scholar]
  26. Magaloni B. 2008. Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and its Demise in Mexico Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  27. Malesky E, Schuler P. 2010. Nodding or needling: analyzing delegate responsiveness in an authoritarian parliament. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 104:3482–502 [Google Scholar]
  28. Malesky E, Schuler P, Tran A. 2012. The adverse effects of sunshine: a field experiment on legislative transparency in an authoritarian assembly. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 106:4762–86 [Google Scholar]
  29. Marshall MG, Cole BR. 2011. Global Report 2011: Conflict, Governance and State Fragility. Vienna, VA: Cent. Systemic Peace
  30. Milgrom PR, North DC, Weingast BR. 1990. The role of institutions in the revival of trade: the law merchant, private judges, and champagne fairs. Econ. Polit. 2:1–23 [Google Scholar]
  31. North DC. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  32. Pierson P. 2004. Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  33. Powell JM, Thyne CL. 2011. Global instances of coups from 1950–2010: a new dataset. Version 2011.04.04
  34. Rajan R, Subramanian A. 2007. Does aid affect governance?. Am. Econ. Rev. 97:2322–27 [Google Scholar]
  35. Regan PM. 2002. Third-party interventions and the duration of intrastate conflicts. J. Confl. Resolut. 46:155–73 [Google Scholar]
  36. Root HL. 1989. Tying the king's hands: credible commitments and royal fiscal policy during the old regime. Ration. Soc. 1:2240–58 [Google Scholar]
  37. Ross M. 2004. How do natural resources influence civil war: evidence from thirteen cases. Int. Organ. 58:Winter35–67 [Google Scholar]
  38. Salehyan I, Gleditsch KS. 2006. Refugees and the spread of civil war. Int. Organ. 60:2335–66 [Google Scholar]
  39. Shepsle KA. 1986. Institutional equilibrium and equilibrium institutions. Political Science: The Science of Politics HF Weisberg 52–81 New York: Agathon [Google Scholar]
  40. Simpser A. 2013. Why Governments and Parties Manipulate Elections: Theory, Practice, and Implications New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  41. Smith A. 2003. Election timing in majoritarian parliaments. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 33:3397–418 [Google Scholar]
  42. Stockmann D. 2013. Media Commercialization and Authoritarian Rule in China New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  43. Stokes S, Dunning T, Nazareno M, Brusco V. 2013. Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  44. Svolik M. 2012. The Politics of Authoritarian Rule New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  45. Tucker JA. 2007. Enough! Electoral fraud, collective action problems, and post-communist revolutions. Persp. Polit. 5:3535–51 [Google Scholar]
  46. Wantchekon L. 2003. Clientelism and voting behavior: evidence from a field experiment in benin. World Polit. 55:Apr.399–422 [Google Scholar]
  47. Weeden L. 2008. Peripheral Visions: Publics, Power, and Performance in Yemen Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  48. Wright J. 2008. Do authoritarian institutions constrain? How legislatures affect economic growth and investment. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 52:2322–43 [Google Scholar]
  49. Wright J, Escriba-Folch A. 2012. Authoritarian institutions and regime survival: transitions to democracy and subsequent authoritarian regimes. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 42:2283–309 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-052013-115248
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error