1932

Abstract

The issue of climate change poses something of a puzzle. For all the attention accorded the issue, climate change/global warming has spawned surprisingly little grassroots activism in the contemporary United States. Drawing on social movement theory, the author seeks to explain this puzzle. The prevailing consensus among movement scholars is that the prospect for movement emergence is facilitated by the confluence of three factors: the expansion of political opportunities, the availability of mobilizing structures, and cognitive and affective mobilization through framing processes. The author then applies each of these factors to the case of climate change, arguing that () awareness of the issue developed during an especially inopportune period in American politics, () the organizations that arose to address the issue were ill suited to the kind of grassroots mobilization characteristic of successful movements, and () the amorphous nature of the issue played havoc with efforts at strategic framing.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-052615-025801
2017-05-11
2024-05-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/polisci/20/1/annurev-polisci-052615-025801.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-052615-025801&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Akerlof K, Maibach EW, Fitzgerald D, Cedeno AY, Neuman A. 2013. Do people “personally experience” global warming, and if so how, and does it matter?. Glob. Environ. Change 23:181–91 [Google Scholar]
  2. Alinsky S. 1989. Rules for Radicals: A Primer for Realistic Radicals New York: Vintage
  3. Aminzade R, McAdam D. 2001. Emotions and contentious politics. Silence and Voice in the Study of Contentious Politics R Aminzade, JA Goldstone, D McAdam, EJ Perry, WH Sewell Jr., et al 14–50 New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  4. Andrews KT. 1997. The impacts of social movements on the political process: a study of the Civil Rights Movement and Black electoral politics in Mississippi. Am. Sociol. Rev. 62:800–19 [Google Scholar]
  5. Andrews KT. 2004. Freedom Is a Constant Struggle Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  6. Ansolabehere S, Konisky DM. 2014. Cheap and Clean: How Americans Think About Energy in the Age of Global Warming Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  7. Baumgartner FR, Berry JM, Hojnacki M, Kimball DC, Leech BL. 2009. Lobbying and Policy Change: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  8. Birnbaum JH. 2000. The Money Men: The Real Story of Fund-Raising's Influence on Political Power in America New York: Crown
  9. Bord R, Fisher A, O'Connor RE. 1998. Public perceptions of global warming: United States and international perspectives. Clim. Res. 11:175–84 [Google Scholar]
  10. Brechin SR. 2003. Comparative public opinion and knowledge on global climate change and the Kyoto Protocol: the U.S. versus the world?. Int. J. Sociol. Soc. Policy 23:10106–34 [Google Scholar]
  11. Brulle RJ. 2000. Agency, Democracy and Nature: The U.S. Environmental Movement from a Critical Theory Perspective Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  12. Brulle RJ. 2014. Institutionalizing delay: foundation funding and the creation of U.S. climate change counter-movement organizations. Clim. Change 122:681–94 [Google Scholar]
  13. Brulle RJ, Carmichael J, Jenkins JC. 2012. Shifting public opinion on climate change: an empirical assessment of factors influencing concern over climate change in the U.S., 2002–2010. Clim. Change 114:2169–88 [Google Scholar]
  14. Caniglia BS, Brulle RJ, Szasz A. 2015. Civil society, social movements, and climate change. Climate Change and Society: Sociological Perspectives RE Dunlap, RJ Brulle 235–68 New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  15. Capstick SB, Pidgeon NF. 2014. What is climate change scepticism? Examination of the concept using a mixed methods study of the U.K. public. Glob. Environ. Change 24:389–401 [Google Scholar]
  16. Cheon A, Urpelainen J. 2016. Targeting Big Polluters: Understanding Activism Against the Fossil Fuel Industry New York: Oxford Univ. Press. In press
  17. Clawson D, Neustadtl A, Weller M. 1998. Dollars and Votes: How Business Campaign Contributions Subvert Democracy Philadelphi: Temple Univ. Press
  18. Converse PE. 1964. The nature of belief systems in mass publics. Ideology and Discontent D Apter 206–64 New York: Free [Google Scholar]
  19. Dietz M, Garrelts H. 2014. Routledge Handbook of the Climate Change Movement New York: Routledge
  20. Doyle T, MacGregor S. 2013. Environmental Movements Around the World Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger
  21. Dryzek JS, Norgaard RB, Schlosberg D. 2011. The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  22. Dunlap RE, Brulle RJ. 2015. Society and Climate Change: Sociological Perspectives New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  23. Dunlap RE, McCright AM. 2015. Challenging climate change: the denial countermovement. Climate Change and Society: Sociological Perspectives RE Dunlap, RJ Brulle 300–32 New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  24. Egan PJ, Mullin M. 2012. Turning personal experience into political attitudes: the effect of local weather on Americans’ perceptions of global warming. J. Polit. 74:3796–809 [Google Scholar]
  25. Feinberg M, Willer R. 2013. The moral roots of environmental attitudes. Psychol. Sci. 24:156–62 [Google Scholar]
  26. Fisher DR. 2004. National Governance and the Global Climate Change Regime Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield
  27. Fisher DR. 2013. Understanding the relationship between subnational and national climate change politics in the United States: toward a theory of boomerang federalism. Environ. Plan. C Gov. Policy 31:769–84 [Google Scholar]
  28. Goodwin J, Jasper J. 2004. Rethinking Social Movements: Structure, Meaning and Emotion Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield
  29. Goodwin J, Jasper J, Polletta F. 2001. Passionate Politics: Emotions and Social Movements Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  30. Gould DB. 2009. Moving Politics: Emotion and ACT Up's Fight Against AIDS Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  31. Hackmann H, St. Clair AL. 2012. Transformative Cornerstones of Social Science Research for Global Change Paris: ISSC
  32. Hamilton LC. 2011. Education, politics and opinions about climate change evidence for interaction effects. Clim. Change 104:2231–42 [Google Scholar]
  33. Hamilton LC, Keim BD. 2009. Regional variation in perceptions about climate change. Int. J. Climatol. 29:152348–52 [Google Scholar]
  34. Huffington A. 2010. Third World America: How Our Politicians Are Abandoning the Middle Class and Betraying the American Dream New York: Crown
  35. Int. Soc. Sci. Counc. (ISSC). 2013. World Social Science Report: Changing Global Environments. New York: UNESCO [Google Scholar]
  36. Kahan DM. 2015. Climate-science communication and the measurement problem. Polit. Psychol. 36:1–43 [Google Scholar]
  37. Kahan DM, Peters E, Wittlin M, Slovic P, Ouellette LL. et al. 2012. The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nat. Clim. Change 2:10732–35 [Google Scholar]
  38. Kahn ME, Kotchen MJ. 2011. Business cycle effects on concern about climate change: the chilling effect of recession. Clim. Change Econ. 2:3257–73 [Google Scholar]
  39. Kaiser R. 2009. So Damn Much Money New York: Alfred A. Knopf
  40. Kearns L. 1996. Saving the creation: Christian environmentalism in the United States. Sociol. Relig. 57:55–70 [Google Scholar]
  41. Kellstedt PM, Zahran S, Velditz A. 2008. Personal efficacy, the information environment, and attitudes toward global warming and climate change in the United States. Risk Anal 28:1113–26 [Google Scholar]
  42. Keohane RO. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  43. Keohane RO, Haas PM, Levy MA. 1993. Institutions for the Earth: Sources of Effective International Protection Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  44. Keohane RO, Nye JS Jr. 1977. Power and Interdependence New York: Addison-Wesley Longman
  45. Keohane RO, Victor DG. 2011. The regime complex of climate change. Perspect. Polit. 9:7–23 [Google Scholar]
  46. Konisky DM, Hughes L, Taylor CH. 2016. Extreme weather events and climate change concern. Clim. Change 134:533–47 [Google Scholar]
  47. Krosnick JA, Holbrook AL, Lowe L, Visser PS. 2006. The origins and consequences of democratic citizens’ policy agendas: a study of popular concern about global warming. Clim. Change 77:1–27–43 [Google Scholar]
  48. Lang C. 2014. Do weather fluctuations cause people to seek information about climate change. ? Clim. Change 125:3–4291–303 [Google Scholar]
  49. Leiserowitz A. 2005. American risk perceptions: Is climate change dangerous. ? Risk Anal 25:61433–22 [Google Scholar]
  50. Leiserowitz A. 2006. Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: the role of affect, imagery, and values. Clim. Change 77:1–245–72 [Google Scholar]
  51. Lessig L. 2011. Republic Lost: How Money Corrupts Congress—And a Plan to Stop It New York: Twelve
  52. Lupia A. 2013. Communicating science in politicized environments. PNAS 110:Suppl. 314048–54 [Google Scholar]
  53. Maibach EW, Nisbet M, Baldwin P, Akerlof K, Diao G. 2010. Reframing climate change as a public health issue: an explanatory study of public reactions. BMC Public Health 10:1299 [Google Scholar]
  54. Malka A, Krosnick JA, Langer G. 2009. The association of knowledge with concern about global warming: Trusted information sources shape public thinking. Risk Anal 29:5633–47 [Google Scholar]
  55. Markowitz EM, Shariff AF. 2012. Climate change and moral judgment. Nat. Clim. Change 2:4243–47 [Google Scholar]
  56. McAdam D. 1986. Recruitment to high-risk activism: the case of Freedom Summer. Am. J. Sociol. 92:64–90 [Google Scholar]
  57. McAdam D. 1999. Political Process and the Development ofBlack Insurgency, 1930–1970. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 2nd ed.. [Google Scholar]
  58. McAdam D, Kloos K. 2014. Deeply Divided: Racial Politics and Social Movements in Postwar America. New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  59. McAdam D, Paulsen R. 1993. Specifying the relationship between social ties and activism. Am. J. Sociol. 99:640–67 [Google Scholar]
  60. McCarthy JD, Zald M. 1977. Resource mobilization and social movements: a partial theory. Am. J. Sociol. 82:1212–41 [Google Scholar]
  61. McCright AM, Dunlap RE. 2011. The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public's views of global warming, 2001–2010. Sociol. Q. 52:2155–94 [Google Scholar]
  62. Michels R. 1959 (1915). Political Parties New York: Dover
  63. Moser SC. 2010. Communicating climate change: history, challenges, process and future directions. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change 1:131–53 [Google Scholar]
  64. Myers TA, Nisbet MC, Maibach EW, Leiserowitz AA. 2012. A public health frame arouses hopeful emotions about climate change. Clim. Change 113:3–41105–12 [Google Scholar]
  65. Nepstad SE, Smith C. 1999. Rethinking recruitment to high-risk/cost activism: the case of Nicaragua Exchange. Mobilization 4:40–51 [Google Scholar]
  66. Nisbet MC. 2009. Communicating climate change: why frames matter for public engagement. Environment 51:212–23 [Google Scholar]
  67. O'Connor RE, Bord RJ, Fischer A. 1999. Risk perceptions, general environmental beliefs and willingness to address climate change. Risk Anal 19:3461–71 [Google Scholar]
  68. O'Connor RE, Bord RJ, Yarnal B, Wiefek N. 2002. Who wants to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. ? Soc. Sci. Q. 83:11–17 [Google Scholar]
  69. Olson M. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  70. Oreskes N, Conway EM. 2010. Merchants of Doubt New York: Bloomsbury
  71. Passy F, Giugni M. 2000. Life-spheres, networks, and sustained participation in social movements: a phenomenological approach to political commitment. Sociol. Forum 15:117–44 [Google Scholar]
  72. Piven FF, Cloward RA. 1979. Poor People's Movements New York: Vintage
  73. Poloni-Staudinger I. 2009. Why cooperate? Cooperation among environmental groups in the United Kingdom, France and Germany. Mobilization 14:375–96 [Google Scholar]
  74. Poole KT, Rosenthal H. 1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  75. Roberts JT, Parks BC. 2007. A Climate of Injustice: Global Inequality, North-South Politics and Climate Policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  76. Rootes C, Zito A, Barry J. 2012. Climate change, national politics and grassroots activism: an introduction. Environ. Polit. 21:677–90 [Google Scholar]
  77. Rudman LA, McLean MC, Bunzl M. 2013. When truth is personally inconvenient: Attitudes change the impact of extreme weather on implicit support for green politicians and explicit climate-change beliefs. Psychol. Sci. 24:112290–96 [Google Scholar]
  78. Rupp L, Taylor V. 1987. Survival in the Doldrums: The American Women's Rights Movement. New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  79. Schuldt JP, Konrath SH, Schwartz N. 2011. “Global warming” or “climate change”? Whether the planet is warming depends on question wording. Public Opin. Q. 75:1115–24 [Google Scholar]
  80. Scruggs L, Benegal S. 2012. Declining public concern about climate change: Can we blame the Great Recession?. Glob. Environ. Change 22:2505–15 [Google Scholar]
  81. Shwom R, Bidwell D, Dan A, Dietz T. 2010. Understanding U.S. public support for domestic climate change policies. Glob. Environ. Change 20:3472–82 [Google Scholar]
  82. Smith N, Leiserowitz A. 2014. The role of emotion in global warming policy support and opposition. Risk Anal 34:5937–48 [Google Scholar]
  83. Snow DA, McAdam D. 2000. Identity work processes in the context of social movements: clarifying the identity/movement nexus. Self, Identity and Social Movements S Stryker, TJ Owens, RW White 41–67 Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press [Google Scholar]
  84. Tarrow S. 1989. Democracy and Disorder: Protest and Politics inItaly, 1965–75. Oxford, UK: Clarendon [Google Scholar]
  85. Tilly C. 1978. From Mobilization to Revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley [Google Scholar]
  86. Urpelainen J. 2013. International environmental agreements. Polit. Law Econ. 13:107–25 [Google Scholar]
  87. Victor DG. 2001. Collapse of the Kyoto Protocol and the Struggle to Slow Global Warning. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  88. Villar A, Krosnick JA. 2011. Global warming versus climate change, taxes versus prices: Does word choice matter. ? Clim. Change 105:1–21–12 [Google Scholar]
  89. Walsh EJ, Warland RH. 1983. Social movement involvement in the wake of a nuclear accident: activists and free riders in the Three Mile Island area. Am. Sociol. Rev. 48:764–81 [Google Scholar]
  90. Walström M, Wennerhag M, Rootes C. 2013. Framing “the climate issue”: patterns of participation and prognostic frames among climate change protestors. Glob. Environ. Polit. 13:101–22 [Google Scholar]
  91. Weber M. 2009 (1905). The Theory of Social and Economic Organization New York: Simon & Schuster
  92. Whitmarsh L. 2008. Are flood victims more concerned about climate change than other people? The role of direct experience in risk perception and behavioural response. J. Risk Response 11:3351–74 [Google Scholar]
  93. Wiltfang G, McAdam D. 1991. Distinguishing cost and risk in sanctuary activism. Soc. Forces 77:289–310 [Google Scholar]
  94. Wood BD, Vedlitz A. 2007. Issue definition, information processing, and the politics of global warming. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 51:3552–68 [Google Scholar]
  95. Zehr S. 2014. The sociology of global climate change. WIREs Clim. Change. doi: 10.1002/wcc.328
  96. Zhao D. 1998. Ecologies of social movements: student mobilization during the 1989 prodemocracy movement in Beijing. Am. J. Sociol. 103:61493–529 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-052615-025801
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-052615-025801
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error