1932

Abstract

This article considers whether political science should abandon the subfields of American politics, comparative politics, and international relations (IR), for new subfields of conflict, political economy, institutions, and behavior. The focus here is whether the field should abandon IR. The article lays out the arguments in favor of abandoning IR, describing scholarly trends that cross conventional subfield lines and are pushing to dissolve IR. Next, it argues that the costs of abandoning IR exceed the benefits, as new subfield divisions would remove some artificial walls but create new ones. Abandoning IR might undermine objective theory testing, would disadvantage the study of international system and structure, and would undermine the ability of political science to inform foreign policy debates. The article concludes by recommending that the field keep IR and its current subfield boundaries but that the walls between subfields should be kept low and porous.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-053013-041156
2015-05-11
2024-05-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/polisci/18/1/annurev-polisci-053013-041156.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-053013-041156&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Adams WY. 1998. The Philosophical Roots of Anthropology Stanford, CA: Cent. Stud. Lang. Inf.
  2. Alger CF. 1963. Comparison of intranational and international politics. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 57:Jun.406–19 [Google Scholar]
  3. Allison GT. 1971. Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis Boston: Little, Brown
  4. Axelrod R, Keohane RO. 1985. Achieving cooperation under anarchy: strategies and institutions. World Polit. 38:Oct.226–54 [Google Scholar]
  5. Baum MA. 2003. Soft News Goes to War: Public Opinion and American Foreign Policy in the New Media Age Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  6. Baum MA, Groeling T. 2010. War Stories: The Causes and Consequences of Public Views of War Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  7. Bearce DH. 2003. Societal preferences, partisan agents, and monetary policy outcomes. Int. Organ. 57:Spring373–410 [Google Scholar]
  8. Beardsley K. 2011. The Mediation Dilemma Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
  9. Berinsky AJ. 2009. In Time of War: Understanding American Public Opinion from World War II to Iraq Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  10. Berman E, Shapiro JN, Felter JH. 2011. Can hearts and minds be bought? The economics of counterinsurgency in Iraq. J. Polit. Econ. 119:Aug.766–819 [Google Scholar]
  11. Besley T, Persson T. 2011. Pillars of Prosperity: The Political Economics of Development Clusters Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  12. Blattman C. 2009. From violence to voting: war and political participation in Uganda. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 103:2231–47 [Google Scholar]
  13. Braumoeller BF. 2013. The Great Powers and the International System: Systemic Theory in Empirical Perspective Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  14. Brecher M. 1999. International studies in the twentieth century and beyond: flawed dichotomies, synthesis, cumulation. Int. Stud. Q. 43:June213–64 [Google Scholar]
  15. Carrubba CJ, Clark TS. 2012. Rule creation in a political hierarchy. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 106:Aug.622–43 [Google Scholar]
  16. Carrubba CJ, Gabel M, Murrah L, Clough R, Montgomery E, Schambach R. 2006. Off the record: unrecorded legislative votes, selection bias and roll-call vote analysis. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 36:691–704 [Google Scholar]
  17. Cetinyan R. 2002. Ethnic bargaining in the shadow of third-party intervention. Int. Organ. 56:Summer645–77 [Google Scholar]
  18. Chapman TL. 2011. Securing Approval: Domestic Politics and Multilateral Authorization for War Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  19. Christakis NA. 2013. Let's shake up the social sciences. N. Y. Times July 19. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/21/opinion/sunday/lets-shake-up-the-social-sciences.html?_r=0
  20. Colgan JD. 2013. Petro-Aggression: When Oil Causes War New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  21. Collier P, Hoeffler A. 2004. Greed and grievance in civil war. Oxf. Econ. Pap. 56:4563–95 [Google Scholar]
  22. Cunningham DE, Lemke D. 2013. Combining civil and interstate wars. Int. Organ. 67:July609–27 [Google Scholar]
  23. Diamond AM Jr, Haurin DR. 1995. Changing patterns of subfield specialization among cohorts of economists from 1927–1988. Res. Hist. Econ. Thought Methodol. 13:103–23 [Google Scholar]
  24. Downes AB. 2008. Targeting Civilians in War Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
  25. Doyle MW, Sambanis N. 2006. Making War and Building Peace: United Nations Peace Operations Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  26. Elsig M. 2011. Principal–agent and the World Trade Organization: “complex agency” and missing delegation. Eur. J. Int. Relat. 17:Sep.495–517 [Google Scholar]
  27. Farrell H, Newman AL. 2014. Domestic institutions beyond the nation state: charting the new interdependence approach. World Polit. 66:331–63 [Google Scholar]
  28. Farrell RB. 1966. Approaches to Comparative and International Politics Evanston, IL: Northwestern Univ. Press
  29. Fearon JD. 1995. Rationalist explanations for war. Int. Organ. 49:Summer379–414 [Google Scholar]
  30. Fearon JD. 1998. Commitment problems and the spread of ethnic conflict. The International Spread of Ethnic Conflict: Fear, Diffusion, and Escalation D Lake, D Rothchild 107–26 Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  31. Fearon JD. 2004. Why do some civil wars last so much longer than others?. J. Peace Res. 41:275–301 [Google Scholar]
  32. Findley MG, Nielson DL, Sharman JC. 2013. Using field experiments in international relations: a randomized study of anonymous incorporation. Int. Organ. 67:Fall657–93 [Google Scholar]
  33. Flaherty C. 2013. The gender lens. Inside Higher Ed. July 11. http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2013/07/11/princeton-grad-student-takes-humanities-crisis-decidedly-gendered-perspective
  34. Fortna VP. 2004. Peace Time: Cease-Fire Agreements and the Durability of Peace Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  35. Fortna VP. 2008. Does Peacekeeping Work? Shaping Belligerents' Choices After Civil War Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  36. Friedrich CJ. 1966. Intranational politics and foreign policy in developed (Western) systems. Approaches to Comparative and International Politics RB Farrell 97–119 Evanston, IL: Northwestern Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  37. Fuhrmann M. 2012. Atomic Assistance: How “Atoms for Peace” Programs Cause Nuclear Insecurity Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
  38. Goddard S. 2009. Uncommon Ground: Indivisible Territory and the Politics of Legitimacy Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press
  39. Goemans HE. 2000. War and Punishment: The Causes of War Termination and the First World War Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  40. Graham ER, Shipan CR, Volden C. 2014. The communication of ideas across subfields in political science. PS Polit. Sci. Polit. 47:Apr.468–75 [Google Scholar]
  41. Hafner-Burton EM, Kahler M, Montgomery AH. 2009. Network analysis for international relations. Int. Organ. 63:July559–92 [Google Scholar]
  42. Hassner RE. 2009. War on Sacred Grounds Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
  43. Holmes M. 2013. The force of face-to-face diplomacy: mirror neurons and the problem of intentions. Int. Organ. 67:Fall829–61 [Google Scholar]
  44. Hosseini H. 2003. The arrival of behavioral economics: from Michigan, or the Carnegie School in the 1950s and the early 1960s?. J. Socio-Econ. 32:391–409 [Google Scholar]
  45. Htun M, Weldon SL. 2012. The civic origins of progressive policy change: combating violence against women in global perspective, 1975–2005. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 106:Aug.548–69 [Google Scholar]
  46. Hyde SD, Marinov N. 2014. Information and self-enforcing democracy: the role of international election observation. Int. Organ. 68:Spring329–59 [Google Scholar]
  47. Ikenberry J, Mastunduno M, Wohlforth WC. 2011. International Relations Theory and the Consequences of Unipolarity Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  48. Jervis R. 1976. Perception and Misperception in International Politics Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  49. Kalyvas SN. 2006. The Logic of Violence in Civil War Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  50. Kalyvas SN, Balcells L. 2010. International system and technologies of rebellion: how the end of the Cold War shaped internal conflict. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 104:Aug.415–29 [Google Scholar]
  51. Kardasheva R. 2013. Package deals in EU legislative politics. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 57:Oct.858–74 [Google Scholar]
  52. Katzenstein P. 2005. A World of Regions: Asia and Europe in the American Imperium Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
  53. Keohane RO. 2009. The old IPE and the new. Rev. Int. Polit. Econ. 16:Feb.34–46 [Google Scholar]
  54. Keohane RO. 1984. After Hegemony: Collaboration and Discord in the World Political Economy Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  55. Keohane RO, Moravcsik A, Slaughter A. 2000. Legalized dispute resolution: interstate and transnational. Int. Organ. 54:Summer457–88 [Google Scholar]
  56. Keohane RO, Nye JS. 1977. Power and Interdependence Boston: Little, Brown
  57. Kocher MA, Pepinsky TB, Kalyvas SN. 2011. Aerial bombing and counterinsurgency in the Vietnam War. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 55:Apr.201–18 [Google Scholar]
  58. Kreps SE, Flores-Macias G. 2013. Political parties at war: a study of American war finance, 1789–2010. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 107:Nov.833–48 [Google Scholar]
  59. Lake DA. 2009a. Hierarchy in International Relations Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
  60. Lake DA. 2009b. Open economy politics: a critical review. Rev. Int. Organ. 4:219–44 [Google Scholar]
  61. Lake DA. 2010. Rightful rules: authority, order, and the foundations of global governance. Int. Stud. Q. 54:3587–613 [Google Scholar]
  62. Layne C. 2012. This time it's real: the end of unipolarity and the Pax Americana. Int. Stud. Q. 56:Mar.203–13 [Google Scholar]
  63. Lindley D. 2007. Promoting Peace with Information Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  64. Lo N, Hashimoto B, Reiter D. 2008. Ensuring peace: foreign imposed regime change and postwar peace duration, 1914–2001. Int. Organ. 62:Oct.717–36 [Google Scholar]
  65. Lupu Y, Traag V. 2013. Trading communities, the networked structure of international relations and the Kantian peace. J. Confl. Resolut. 57:6469–503 [Google Scholar]
  66. Lupu Y, Voeten E. 2011. Precedent in international courts: a network analysis of case citations by the European Court of Human Rights. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 42:413–39 [Google Scholar]
  67. Manning CAW. 1954. International Relations Geneva: UNESCO
  68. Mansfield E, Reinhardt E. 2008. International institutions and the volatility of international trade. Int. Organ. 62:Oct.621–52 [Google Scholar]
  69. Maoz Z. 2010. Networks of Nations: The Evolution, Structure, and Impact of International Networks, 1816–2001 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  70. McDermott R, Wernimont N, Koopman C. 2011. Applying psychology to international studies: challenges and opportunities in examining traumatic stress. Int. Stud. Perspect. 12:2119–35 [Google Scholar]
  71. McDonald PJ. 2009. The Invisible Hand of Peace: Capitalism, the War Machine, and International Relations Theory New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  72. Mead WR. 2014. The return of geopolitics: the revenge of the revisionist powers. For. Aff. 93:May/June69–79 [Google Scholar]
  73. Mettler SA, Reiter D. 2013. Ballistic missiles and international conflict. J. Confl. Resolut. 57:Oct.854–80 [Google Scholar]
  74. Miguel E, Satyanath S, Sergenti E. 2004. Economic shocks and civil conflict: an instrumental variables approach. J. Polit. Econ. 112:4725–53 [Google Scholar]
  75. Milner HV. 1998. Rationalizing politics: the emerging synthesis of international, American, and comparative politics. Int. Organ. 52:Autumn759–86 [Google Scholar]
  76. Monteiro N. 2014. Theory of Unipolar Politics Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  77. Morgenthau HJ. 1948. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace New York: Knopf
  78. Morrow JD. 2014. Order Within Anarchy: The Laws of War as an International Institution Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  79. Mueller JE. 1973. War, Presidents, and Public Opinion New York: Wiley
  80. Mueller JE. 1989. Retreat from Doomsday: The Obsolescence of Major War New York: Basic Books
  81. Mueller JE. 2004. The Remnants of War Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
  82. Murdie A. 2014. The ties that bind: a network analysis of human rights NGOs. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 44:11–27 [Google Scholar]
  83. Murdie A, Hicks A. 2013. Can international nongovernmental organizations boost government services? The case of health. Int. Organ. 67:Summer541–73 [Google Scholar]
  84. Nickles DP. 2011. Diplomatic history and the political science wars. Persp. Hist. May. http://www.historians.org/publications-and-directories/perspectives-on-history/may-2011/political-history-today/diplomatic-history-and-the-political-science-wars
  85. Oatley T. 2011. The reductionist gamble: open economy politics in the global economy. Int. Organ. 65:Spring311–41 [Google Scholar]
  86. Oye KA. 1986. Cooperation Under Anarchy Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  87. Pape RA. 1996. Bombing to Win Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
  88. Parsons T. 1937. The Structure of Social Action New York: Free Press
  89. Pinker S. 2011. The Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined New York: Viking
  90. Poast P. 2015. Central banks at war. Int. Organ. 69(Winter):63–95
  91. Polanyi MS. 1962. The republic of science: its political and economic theory. Minerva 1:54–74 [Google Scholar]
  92. Posen B. 1993. The security dilemma and ethnic conflict. Survival 35:127–47 [Google Scholar]
  93. Powell R. 2004. The inefficient use of power: costly conflict with complete information. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 98:2231–41 [Google Scholar]
  94. Powell WW. 1990. Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms of organization. Res. Organ. Behav. 12:295–336 [Google Scholar]
  95. Reiter D. 2003. Exploring the bargaining model of war. Perspect. Polit. 1:Mar.27–43 [Google Scholar]
  96. Reiter D. 2009. How Wars End Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  97. Rosen SP. 2005. War and Human Nature Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  98. Rosenau JN. 1968. Comparative foreign policy: fad, fantasy, or field?. Int. Stud. Q. 12:Sep.396–29 [Google Scholar]
  99. Russett B. 1993. Grasping the Democratic Peace: Principles for a Post-Cold War World Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  100. Saleyhan I. 2009. Rebels Without Borders: Transnational Insurgencies in World Politics Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
  101. Shapiro JN. 2013. The Terrorist's Dilemma: Managing Violent Covert Organizations Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  102. Shea PE. 2014. Financing victory: credit, democracy, and war outcomes. J. Confl. Resolut. 58:Aug.771–95 [Google Scholar]
  103. Slaughter A. 2005. A New World Order Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  104. Stam AC III. 1996. Win, Lose, or Draw: Domestic Politics and the Crucible of War Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press
  105. Staton JK, Moore WH. 2011. Judicial power in domestic and international politics. Int. Organ. 65:Summer553–87 [Google Scholar]
  106. Stone RW. 2008. The scope of IMF conditionality. Int. Organ. 62:Fall589–620 [Google Scholar]
  107. Tomz MR, Weeks JLP. 2013. Public opinion and the democratic peace. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 107:Nov.849–65 [Google Scholar]
  108. Van Evera S. 2008. A farewell to geopolitics. To Lead the World: American Strategy after the Bush Doctrine MP Leffler, JW Legro 11–35 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  109. Varshney A. 2002. Ethnic Conflict and Civic Life: Hindus and Muslims in India New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  110. Vavreck L. 2009. The Message Matters: The Economy and Presidential Campaigns Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  111. Wallace GPR. 2012. Welcome guests or inescapable victims? The causes of prisoner abuse in war. J. Confl. Resolut. 56:Dec.955–81 [Google Scholar]
  112. Walter B. 2002. Committing to Peace: The Successful Settlement of Civil Wars Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  113. Waltz KN. 1959. Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis New York: Columbia Univ. Press
  114. Waltz KN. 1979. Theory of International Politics New York: Random House
  115. Weeks JLP. 2014. Dictators at War and Peace Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
  116. Weinstein JM. 2007. Inside Rebellion: The Politics of Insurgent Violence Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  117. Weisiger A. 2013. Logics of War: Sources of Limited and Unlimited Conflict Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
  118. Wendt A. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  119. Wright Q. 1950. Political science and world stabilization. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 44:Mar.1–13 [Google Scholar]
  120. Zhao S. 1993. Realms, subfields, and perspectives: on the differentiation and fragmentation of sociology. Am. Sociol. 24:Fall–Winter5–14 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-053013-041156
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error