1932

Abstract

This essay reviews models of strategic mobilization and turnout, focusing on two important questions about the effects of electoral rules. First, how does the disproportionality of the electoral system affect the variance and mean of mobilization and turnout? This question has been investigated at least since Gosnell (1930). In addition to reviewing the literature, I argue that extant models should pay more explicit attention to secondary mobilization (conducted by interest groups, activists, and ordinary voters). Second, how do electoral rules regulating the electoral calendar and vote fusion affect mobilizational spillovers and, hence, incentives to build mobilizational alliances? This question has attracted less attention from modelers but is well represented in the empirical literature.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-060414-035915
2015-05-11
2024-06-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/polisci/18/1/annurev-polisci-060414-035915.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-060414-035915&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abrams S, Iversen T, Soskice D. 2011. Informal social networks and rational voting. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 41:2229–57 [Google Scholar]
  2. Aldrich J. 1995. Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  3. Blais A, Carty RK. 1990. Does proportional representation foster voter turnout?. Eur. J. Polit. Res. 18:2167–81 [Google Scholar]
  4. Blais A, Dobrzynska A. 1998. Turnout in electoral democracies. Eur. J. Polit. Res. 33:2239–61 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bochel JM, Denver DT. 1971. Canvassing, turnout and party support: an experiment. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 1:3257–69 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bond R, Fariss CJ, Jones JJ, Kramer ADI, Marlow C. et al. 2012. A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization. Nature 489:295–98 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bowler S, Brockington D, Donovan T. 2001. Election systems and voter turnout: experiments in the United States. J. Polit. 63:3902–15 [Google Scholar]
  8. Boyd R. 1981. Decline of US voter turnout: structural explanations. Am. Polit. Q. 9:2133–59 [Google Scholar]
  9. Brady H, Verba S, Schlozman K. 1994. Beyond SES: a resource model of political participation. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 89:829–38 [Google Scholar]
  10. Copeland G. 1983. Activating voters in congressional elections. Polit. Behav. 5:391–401 [Google Scholar]
  11. Cox GW. 1999. Electoral rules and the calculus of mobilization. Legis. Stud. Q. 24:3387–419 [Google Scholar]
  12. Cox GW, Katz J. 2002. Elbridge Gerry's Salamander New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  13. Cox GW, Kousser JM. 1981. Turnout and rural corruption: New York as a test case. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 25:4646–63 [Google Scholar]
  14. Cox GW, Munger MC. 1989. Closeness, expenditure, turnout: the 1982 U.S. House elections. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 83:217–32 [Google Scholar]
  15. Cox GW, Rosenbluth F, Thies M. 1998. Mobilization, social networks and turnout: evidence from Japan. World Polit. 50:447–72 [Google Scholar]
  16. Dawson PA, Zinser JE. 1976. Political finance and participation in congressional elections. Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 425:59–73 [Google Scholar]
  17. Denver D, Hands G. 1974. Marginality and turnout in British general elections. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 4:17–35 [Google Scholar]
  18. Denver D, Hands G. 1985. Marginality and turnout in general elections in the 1970s. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 15:381–88 [Google Scholar]
  19. Denver D, Hands G. 1997. Modern Constituency Electioneering: Local Campaigning in the 1992 General Election London: Frank Cass [Google Scholar]
  20. Eggers A. 2013. Proportionality and turnout: evidence from French municipalities Unpublished typescript, London School Econ. Polit. Sci. [Google Scholar]
  21. Engstrom E. 2012. The rise and decline of turnout in congressional elections. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 56:2373–86 [Google Scholar]
  22. Engstrom E, Kernell S. 2014. Party Ballots, Reform and the Transformation of America's Electoral System New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  23. Feddersen T, Sandroni A. 2006. A theory of participation in elections. Am. Econ. Rev. 96:41271–82 [Google Scholar]
  24. Fieldhouse EA, Pattie CJ, Johnson RJ. 1996. Tactical voting and party constituency campaigning at the 1992 general election in England—research note. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 26:403–18 [Google Scholar]
  25. Fowler J. 2005. Turnout in a small world. The Social Logic of Politics: Personal Networks as Contexts for Political Behavior A Zuckerman 269–87 Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  26. Franklin M. 2004. Voter Turnout and the Dynamics of Electoral Competition in Established Democracies since 1945 New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  27. Gerber AS, Green DP. 1999. Does canvassing increase voter turnout? A field experiment. PNAS 96:10939–42 [Google Scholar]
  28. Gerber AS, Green DP, Larimer CW. 2008. Social pressure and voter turnout: evidence from a large-scale field experiment. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 102:33–48 [Google Scholar]
  29. Geys B. 2006. Explaining voter turnout: a review of aggregate-level research. Elect. Stud. 25:4637–63 [Google Scholar]
  30. Gosnell H. 1930. Why Europe Votes Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  31. Grofman B, Selb P. 2009. A fully general index of political competition. Elect. Stud. 28:291–96 [Google Scholar]
  32. Grofman B, Selb P. 2011. Turnout and the (effective) number of parties at the national and district levels: a puzzle-solving approach. Party Polit. 17:93–117 [Google Scholar]
  33. Herrera H, Morelli M, Palfrey TR. 2013. Turnout and power sharing Soc. Sci. Work. Pap. No. 1357, Calif. Inst. Technol., Pasadena, CA [Google Scholar]
  34. Janda K. 1980. Political Parties: A Cross-National Survey New York: Free Press [Google Scholar]
  35. Jackman R, Miller RA. 1995. Voter turnout in the industrial democracies during the 1980s. Comp. Polit. Std. 27:467–92 [Google Scholar]
  36. Karp JA, Banducci SA, Bowler S. 2008. Getting out the vote: party mobilization in comparative perspective. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 38:191–112 [Google Scholar]
  37. Kendall MG, Stuart A. 1950. The law of cubic proportion in election results. Br. J. Sociol. 1:183–97 [Google Scholar]
  38. Key VO. 1950. Southern Politics in State and Nation New York: Knopf [Google Scholar]
  39. King G. 1990. Electoral responsiveness and partisan bias in multiparty democracies. Legis. Stud. Q. 15:159–81 [Google Scholar]
  40. Ladner A, Milner H. 1999. Do voters turn out more under proportional than majoritarian systems? The evidence from Swiss communal elections. Elect. Stud. 18:2235–50 [Google Scholar]
  41. Morton R. 1987. A group majority model of voting. Soc. Choice Welfare 4:117–31 [Google Scholar]
  42. Morton R. 1991. Groups in rational turnout models. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 35:758–76 [Google Scholar]
  43. Palfrey TR, Rosenthal H. 1985. Voter participation and strategic uncertainty. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 79:162–78 [Google Scholar]
  44. Poguntke T. 2006. Political parties and other organizations. Handbook of Party Politics R Katz, W Crotty London: Sage [Google Scholar]
  45. Powell GB. 1980. Voting turnout in thirty democracies. Electoral Participation R Rose 396–412 Beverly Hills, CA: Sage [Google Scholar]
  46. Powell GB. 1986. American voter turnout in comparative perspective. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 80:117–43 [Google Scholar]
  47. Radcliff B, Davis P. 2000. Labor organization and electoral participation in industrial democracies. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 44:132–41 [Google Scholar]
  48. Rosenstone SJ, Hansen JM. 1993. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America New York: Macmillan [Google Scholar]
  49. Sanz C. 2013. The effect of electoral systems on voter turnout: evidence from a natural experiment Unpublished typescript, Princeton Univ. [Google Scholar]
  50. Schram A, van Winden F. 1991. Why people vote: free riding and the production and consumption of social pressure. J. Econ. Psychol. 12:575–620 [Google Scholar]
  51. Schwartz T. 1987. Your vote counts on account of the way it is counted. Public Choice 54:101–21 [Google Scholar]
  52. Selb P. 2009. A deeper look at the proportionality–turnout nexus. Comp. Polit. Stud. 42:4527–48 [Google Scholar]
  53. Shachar R, Nalebuff B. 1999. Follow the leader: theory and evidence on political participation. Am. Econ. Rev. 89:3525–47 [Google Scholar]
  54. Smith A, Bueno de Mesquita B. 2012. Contingent prize allocation and pivotal voting. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 42:2371–92 [Google Scholar]
  55. Stockemer D. 2015. District magnitude and electoral turnout: a macro-level global analysis. Acta Polit. 5082–100 [Google Scholar]
  56. Taylor AH. 1972. The effect of party organization: correlation between campaign expenditure and voting in the 1970 election. Polit. Stud. 20:329–31 [Google Scholar]
  57. Tingsten H. 1937. Political Behavior: Studies in Election Statistics London: P.S. King & Sons [Google Scholar]
  58. Uhlaner C. 1989. Rational turnout: the neglected role of groups. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 33:390–422 [Google Scholar]
  59. Vowles J, Banducci S, Karp J. 2006. Forecasting and evaluating the consequences of electoral change in New Zealand. Acta Polit. 41:261–84 [Google Scholar]
  60. Webb P, Farrell DM, Holliday I. 2002. Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-060414-035915
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-060414-035915
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error