1932

Abstract

This article reviews the existing literature, mostly from political science, on suicide bombing. A prominent weapon in the toolkit of violent nonstate actors for a generation, suicide bombing generates a significantly larger number of casualties per attack than other uses of force by terrorist groups, insurgents, and others. Scholars tend to agree that no single reason leads individuals to become suicide bombers. Moreover, groups use suicide bombing for strategic reasons—although whether suicide bombing campaigns make groups more likely to achieve their goals is unclear. Scholars continue to disagree about what drives groups to adopt or eschew suicide bombing, including the role of religion. Although groups that are more religious are significantly more likely to adopt suicide bombing, the underlying cause and its relationship to particular religious ideologies (such as Salafi Jihadi movements) versus the structure of religious groups remain matters of contention.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-062813-051049
2015-05-11
2024-04-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/polisci/18/1/annurev-polisci-062813-051049.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-062813-051049&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abrahms M. 2006. Why terrorism does not work. Int. Secur. 31:42–78 [Google Scholar]
  2. Acosta B, Childs SJ. 2013. Illuminating the global suicide-attack network. Stud. Confl. Terrorism 36:49–76 [Google Scholar]
  3. Araj B. 2008. Harsh state repression as a cause of suicide bombing: the case of the Palestinian–Israeli conflict. Stud. Confl. Terrorism 31:284–303 [Google Scholar]
  4. Asal V, Rethemeyer RK. 2008. The nature of the beast: organizational structures and the lethality of terrorist attacks. J. Polit. 70:437–49 [Google Scholar]
  5. Ashworth S, Clinton JD, Meirowitz A, Ramsey KW. 2008. Design, inference, and the strategic logic of suicide terrorism. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 102:269–73 [Google Scholar]
  6. Atran S. 2003. Genesis of suicide terrorism. Science 299:1534–39 [Google Scholar]
  7. Atran S. 2006. The moral logic and growth of suicide terrorism. Wash. Q. 29:127–47 [Google Scholar]
  8. Azam J-P. 2005. Suicide-bombing as inter-generational investment. Public Choice 122:177–98 [Google Scholar]
  9. Benmelech E, Berrebi C. 2007. Human capital and the productivity of suicide bombers. J. Econ. Perspect. 21:223–38 [Google Scholar]
  10. Benmelech E, Berrebi C, Klor EF. 2012. Economic conditions and the quality of suicide terrorism. J. Polit. 74:113–28 [Google Scholar]
  11. Berman E. 2009. Radical, Religious, and Violent: The New Economics of Terrorism Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  12. Berman E, Laitin DD. 2008. Religion, terrorism and public goods: testing the club model. J. Public Econ. 92:1942–67 [Google Scholar]
  13. Bernholz P. 2004. Supreme values as the basis for terror. Eur. J. Polit. Econ. 20:317–33 [Google Scholar]
  14. Bloom M. 2004. Palestinian suicide bombing: public support, market share, and outbidding. Polit. Sci. Q. 119:61–88 [Google Scholar]
  15. Bloom M. 2005. Dying to Kill: the Allure of Suicide Terror New York: Columbia Univ. Press251
  16. Bloom M. 2010. Death becomes her: women, occupation, and terrorist mobilization. PS Polit. Sci. Polit. 43:445–50 [Google Scholar]
  17. Bloom M. 2012. Bombshell: Women and Terrorism Philadelphia: Univ. Penn. Press
  18. Braun R, Genkin M. 2014. Cultural resonance and the diffusion of suicide bombings: the role of collectivism. J. Confl. Resolut. 58:1258–84 [Google Scholar]
  19. Brym RJ, Araj B. 2008. Palestinian suicide bombing revisited: a critique of the outbidding thesis. Polit. Sci. Q. 123:485–500 [Google Scholar]
  20. Brym RJ, Araj B. 2012a. Are suicide bombers suicidal?. Stud. Confl. Terrorism 35:432–43 [Google Scholar]
  21. Brym RJ, Araj B. 2012b. Suicidality and suicide bombing revisited: a rejoinder to Merari. Stud. Confl. Terrorism 35:733–39 [Google Scholar]
  22. Bueno de Mesquita E. 2005. The quality of terror. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 49:515–30 [Google Scholar]
  23. Chicago Project on Security and Terrorism (CPOST) 2014. Suicide attack database http://cpostdata.uchicago.edu/search_new.php
  24. Christensen CM. 1997. The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail Boston: Harvard Business School Press225
  25. Conley B. 2004. For the women of Chechnya, hope dies last. J. Human Rights 3:331–42 [Google Scholar]
  26. Crenshaw M. 2007. Explaining suicide terrorism: a review essay. Secur. Stud. 16:133–62 [Google Scholar]
  27. Davis J. 2013. Evolution of the global jihad: female suicide bombers in Iraq. Stud. Confl. Terrorism 36:279–91 [Google Scholar]
  28. Findley MG, Young JK. 2012. More combatant groups, more terror? Empirical tests of an outbidding logic. Terrorism Polit. Violence 24:706–21 [Google Scholar]
  29. Gambetta D. 2005a. Can we make sense of suicide missions?. See Gambetta 2005b 259–99
  30. Gambetta D. 2005b. Making Sense of Suicide Missions. New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  31. Gambetta D, Hertog S. 2009. Why are there so many engineers among Islamic radicals?. Eur. J. Sociol. 50:201–30 [Google Scholar]
  32. Gilli A, Gilli M. 2014. The spread of military innovations: adoption capacity theory, tactical incentives, and the case of suicide terrorism. Secur. Stud. 23:513–47 [Google Scholar]
  33. Gupta DK, Mundra K. 2005. Suicide bombing as a strategic weapon: an empirical investigation of Hamas and Islamic Jihad. Terrorism Polit. Violence 17:573–98 [Google Scholar]
  34. Hafez MM. 2006. Manufacturing Human Bombs: Strategy, Culture, and Conflict in the Making of Palestinian Suicide Bombers Washington, DC: US Inst. Peace
  35. Hoffman B. 2004. The changing face of al Qaeda and the global war on terrorism. Stud. Confl. Terrorism 27:549–60 [Google Scholar]
  36. Hoffman B. 2006. Combating al Qaeda and the militant Islamic threat. Testimony before the House Armed Services Committee, Subcommittee on Terrorism, Unconventional Threats and Capabilities, http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/testimonies/2006/RAND_CT255.pdf
  37. Hoffman B, McCormick GH. 2004. Terrorism, signaling, and suicide attack. Stud. Confl. Terrorism 27:243–81 [Google Scholar]
  38. Hopgood S. 2005. Tamil Tigers, 1987–2002. See Gambetta 2005b 43–76
  39. Horowitz M. 2010a. The Diffusion of Military Power: Causes and Consequences for International Politics Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  40. Horowitz MC. 2010b. Nonstate actors and the diffusion of innovations: the case of suicide terrorism. Int. Organ. 64:33–64 [Google Scholar]
  41. Horowitz MC. 2015. Adoption capacity and the spread of suicide bombing. H-Diplo/ISSF http://issforum.org/ISSF/PDF/RE26.pdf
  42. Horowitz MC, Potter PB. 2014. Allying to kill: terrorist intergroup cooperation and the consequences for lethality. J. Confl. Resolut. 58:199–225 [Google Scholar]
  43. Iannaccone LR. 2006. The market for martyrs. Interdiscip. J. Res. Religion 2:1–28 [Google Scholar]
  44. Iannaccone LR, Berman E. 2006. Religious extremism: the good, the bad, and the deadly. Public Choice 128:109–29 [Google Scholar]
  45. Jackson Wade S, Reiter D. 2007. Does democracy matter?. J. Confl. Resolut. 51:329–48 [Google Scholar]
  46. Kalyvas S, Sánchez-Cuenca I. 2005. Killing without dying: the absence of suicide missions. See Gambetta 2005b 209–32
  47. Krueger AB. 2007. What Makes a Terrorist? Economics and the Roots of Terrorism: Lionel Robbins Lectures Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  48. Krueger AB, Maleckova J. 2003. Education, poverty and terrorism: Is there a causal connection. J. Econ. Perspect. 17:119–44 [Google Scholar]
  49. Kydd A, Walter BF. 2002. Sabotaging the peace: the politics of extremist violence. Int. Organ. 56:263–96 [Google Scholar]
  50. Kydd AH, Walter BF. 2006. The strategies of terrorism. Int. Secur. 31:49–80 [Google Scholar]
  51. Lankford A. 2011. Could suicide terrorists actually be suicidal?. Stud. Confl. Terrorism 34:337–66 [Google Scholar]
  52. Lankford A. 2014. The myth of martyrdom: what really drives suicide bombers, rampage shooters, and other self-destructive killers. Behav. Brain Sci. 37:351–62 [Google Scholar]
  53. Merari A. 2012. Studying suicide bombers: a response to Brym and Araj's critique. Stud. Confl. Terrorism 35:444–55 [Google Scholar]
  54. Michel J-B, Shen YK, Aiden AP, Veres A, Gray MK. et al. 2011. Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books. Science 331:176–82 [Google Scholar]
  55. Moghadam A. 2006a. The root causes of suicide terrorism: a multi-causal approach. Root Causes of Suicide Terrorism: The Globalization of Martyrdom A Pedahzur 81–87 New York: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  56. Moghadam A. 2006b. Suicide terrorism, occupation, and the globalization of martyrdom: a critique of Dying to Win. Stud. Confl. Terrorism 29:707–29 [Google Scholar]
  57. Moghadam A. 2009. Motives for martyrdom: al-Qaida, Salafi Jihad, and the spread of suicide attacks. Int. Secur. 33:46–78 [Google Scholar]
  58. National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (START) 2013. Global terrorism database http://www.start.umd.edu/gtd
  59. Olson M. 1982. The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation, and Social Rigidities New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press273
  60. Pape RA. 2003. The strategic logic of suicide terrorism. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 97:343–61 [Google Scholar]
  61. Pape RA. 2005. Dying to Win: the Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism New York: Random House335
  62. Pape RA, Feldman JK. 2010. Cutting the Fuse: the Explosion of Global Suicide Terrorism and How to Stop It Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  63. Pape RA, Ruby K, Bauer V. 2014. Government data exaggerate the increase in terrorist attacks. Washington Post. Monkey Cage blog, Jul. 21. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkey-cage/wp/2014/07/21/government-data-exaggerate-the-increase-in-terrorist-attacks/
  64. Pedahzur A. 2005. Suicide Terrorism Malden, MA: Polity261
  65. Pedahzur A, Perliger A. 2006. The changing nature of suicide attacks: a social network perspective. Soc. Forces 84:1987–2008 [Google Scholar]
  66. Piazza JA. 2008. A supply-side view of suicide terrorism: a cross-national study. J. Polit. 70:28–39 [Google Scholar]
  67. Piazza JA. 2009. Is Islamist terrorism more lethal? An empirical study of group ideology, organization and goal structure. Terrorism Polit. Violence 21:62–88 [Google Scholar]
  68. Ramasubramanian R. 2004. Suicide Terrorism in Sri Lanka New Delhi, India: Inst. Peace Confl. Stud.
  69. Ricolfi L. 2005. Palestinians, 1981–2003. See Gambetta 2005b 77–130
  70. Rogers EM. 2003. Diffusion of Innovations New York: Free Press551
  71. Rosendorff BP, Sandler T. 2010. Suicide terrorism and the backlash effect. Defence Peace Econ. 21:443–57 [Google Scholar]
  72. Sageman M. 2004. Understanding Terror Networks Philadelphia: Univ. Penn. Press220
  73. Santifort-Jordan C, Sandler T. 2014. An empirical study of suicide terrorism: global analysis. Southern Econ. J. 80:981–1001 [Google Scholar]
  74. Shay S. 2004. The Shahids: Islam and Suicide Attacks New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction
  75. Skaine R. 2006. Female Suicide Bombers New York: McFarland
  76. Waltz KN. 1959. Man, the State, and War New York: Columbia Univ. Press
  77. Weinberg L, Pedahzur A, Canetti-Nisim D. 2003. The social and religious characteristics of suicide bombers and their victims. Terrorism Polit. Violence 15:139–53 [Google Scholar]
  78. Yang J. 2002. Saddam rewards suicide bombers' families. ABC News http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/story?id=129914
  79. Young JK, Dugan L. 2014. Survival of the fittest: why terrorist groups endure. Perspect. Terrorism 8. http://www.terrorismanalysts.com/pt/index.php/pot/article/view/334/669
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-062813-051049
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-062813-051049
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error