Sibling Comparison Studies

Literature Cited

1. Abel K, Wicks S, Susser E, Dalman C, Pedersen M et al. 2010. Birth weight, schizophrenia, and adult mental disorder: Is risk confined to the smallest babies?. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 67:9923–30
   [Google Scholar]
2. Allison P. 2005. Fixed Effects Regression Methods for Longitudinal Data Using SAS Cary, NC: SAS Inst.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Allison P. 2009. Fixed Effects Regression Models Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE
   [Google Scholar]
4. Andersen E. 1970. Asymptotic properties of conditional maximum-likelihood estimators. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 32:2283–301
   [Google Scholar]
5. Ashenfelter O, Krueger A. 1994. Estimates of the economic return to schooling from a new sample of twins. Am. Econ. Rev. 84:51157–73
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bang H, Robins J. 2005. Doubly robust estimation in missing data and causal inference models. Biometrics 61:4962–73
   [Google Scholar]
7. Boone-Heinonen J, Biel F, Marshall N, Snowden J 2020. Maternal pre-pregnancy BMI and size at birth: race/ethnicity-stratified, within-family associations in over 500,000 siblings. Ann. Epidemiol. 46:49–56.e5
   [Google Scholar]
8. Breslow N, Day N. 1980. Statistical Methods in Cancer Research, Vol. I: The Analysis of Case-Control Studies Lyon, Fr: IARC/WHO
   [Google Scholar]
9. Brumback B, Dailey A, Brumback L, Livingston M, He Z. 2010. Adjusting for confounding by cluster using generalized linear mixed models. Stat. Probab. Lett. 80:21–221650–54
   [Google Scholar]
10. Cai Z, Brumback B. 2015. Model-based standardization to adjust for unmeasured cluster-level confounders with complex survey data. Stat. Med. 34:152368–80
    [Google Scholar]
11. Carlin J, Gurrin L, Sterne J, Morley R, Dwyer T 2005. Regression models for twin studies: a critical review. Int. J. Epidemiol. 34:51089–99
    [Google Scholar]
12. Class Q, Rickert M, Larsson H, Lichtenstein P, D'Onofrio B. 2014. Fetal growth and psychiatric and socio-economic problems: population-based sibling comparison. Br. J. Psychiatry 205:5355–61
    [Google Scholar]
13. Dahlqwist E, Pawitan Y, Sjölander A. 2019. Regression standardization and attributable fraction estimation with between-within frailty models for clustered survival data. Stat. Methods Med. Res. 28:2462–85
    [Google Scholar]
14. Dai J, Mukamal K, Krasnow R, Swan G, Reed T. 2015. Higher usual alcohol consumption was associated with a lower 41-y mortality risk from coronary artery disease in men independent of genetic and common environmental factors: the prospective NHLBI Twin Study. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 102:131–39
    [Google Scholar]
15. Daley D, Jacobsen R, Lange A, Sørensen A, Walldorf J. 2019. The economic burden of adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a sibling comparison cost analysis. Eur. Psychiatry 61:41–48
    [Google Scholar]
16. D'Onofrio B, Rickert M, Frans E, Kuja-Halkola R, Almqvist C et al. 2014. Paternal age at childbearing and offspring psychiatric and academic morbidity. JAMA Psychiatry 71:4432–38
    [Google Scholar]
17. Eisen S, Goldberg J, True W, Henderson W. 1991. A co-twin control study of the effects of the Vietnam War on the self-reported physical health of veterans. Am. J. Epidemiol. 134:149–58
    [Google Scholar]
18. Falconer DS, Mackay T. 1996. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics New York: Pearson. , 4th ed..
    [Google Scholar]
19. Fitzmaurice G, Laird N, Ware J 2011. Applied Longitudinal Analysis New York: Wiley
    [Google Scholar]
20. Floderus B, Cederlöf R, Friberg L 1988. Smoking and mortality: a 21-year follow-up based on the Swedish twin registry. Int. J. Epidemiol. 17:2332–40
    [Google Scholar]
21. Frisell T, Öberg S, Kuja-Halkola R, Sjölander A. 2012. Sibling comparison designs: bias from non-shared confounders and measurement error. Epidemiology 23:5713–20
    [Google Scholar]
22. Gesell A. 1942. The method of co-twin control. Science 95:2470446–48
    [Google Scholar]
23. Goetgeluk S, Vansteelandt S. 2008. Conditional generalized estimating equations for the analysis of clustered and longitudinal data. Biometrics 64:3772–80
    [Google Scholar]
24. Gorseline D. 1932. The effect of schooling upon income. PhD Thesis Indiana Univ. Bloomington:
    [Google Scholar]
25. Greenland S. 1991. Reducing mean squared error in the analysis of stratified epidemiologic studies. Biometrics 47:773–76
    [Google Scholar]
26. Greenland S. 2003. Quantifying biases in causal models: classical confounding vs collider-stratification bias. Epidemiology 14:3300–6
    [Google Scholar]
27. Greenland S, Robins J, Pearl J. 1999. Confounding and collapsibility in causal inference. Stat. Sci. 14:129–46
    [Google Scholar]
28. Griliches Z. 1979. Sibling models and data in economics: beginnings of a survey. J. Political Econ. 87:5S37–S64
    [Google Scholar]
29. Hernán M, Robins J. 2020. Causal Inference: What If. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC
    [Google Scholar]
30. Holt J, Prentice R. 1974. Survival analyses in twin studies and matched pair experiments. Biometrika 61:117–30
    [Google Scholar]
31. Jonsson F, Wolk A, Pedersen N, Lichtenstein P, Terry P et al. 2003. Obesity and hormone-dependent tumors: cohort and co-twin control studies based on the Swedish Twin Registry. Int. J. Cancer 106:4594–99
    [Google Scholar]
32. Jung S. 1999. Rank tests for matched survival data. Lifetime Data Anal. 5:167–79
    [Google Scholar]
33. Kalish L. 1990. Reducing mean squared error in the analysis of pair-matched case-control studies. Biometrics 46:2493–99
    [Google Scholar]
34. Kaplan E, Meier P. 1958. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 53:282457–81
    [Google Scholar]
35. Kendler K, Karkowski L, Prescott C 1999. Causal relationship between stressful life events and the onset of major depression. Am. J. Psychiatry 156:6837–41
    [Google Scholar]
36. Klein J, Moeschberger M. 2003. Survival Analysis: Techniques for Censored and Truncated Data. New York: Springer. , 2nd ed..
    [Google Scholar]
37. Kolk M, Barclay K. 2019. Cognitive ability and fertility among Swedish men born 1951–1967: evidence from military conscription registers. Proc. R. Soc. B 286:20190359
    [Google Scholar]
38. Lampi K, Lehtonen L, Tran P, Suominen A, Lehti V et al. 2012. Risk of autism spectrum disorders in low birth weight and small for gestational age infants. J. Pediatr. 161:5830–36
    [Google Scholar]
39. Lancaster T. 2000. The incidental parameter problem since 1948. J. Econom. 95:2391–413
    [Google Scholar]
40. Land J. 2006. How should we report on perinatal outcome?. Hum. Reprod. 21:102638–39
    [Google Scholar]
41. Lawlor D, Clark H, Smith G, Leon D 2006. Intrauterine growth and intelligence within sibling pairs: findings from the Aberdeen children of the 1950s cohort. Pediatrics 117:5e894–e902
    [Google Scholar]
42. Lawlor D, Mortensen L, Nybo Andersen A. 2011. Mechanisms underlying the associations of maternal age with adverse perinatal outcomes: a sibling study of 264,695 Danish women and their firstborn offspring. Int. J. Epidemiol. 40:51205–14
    [Google Scholar]
43. Levit S. 1935. Twin investigations in the U.S.S.R. J. Personal. 3:3188–93
    [Google Scholar]
44. Little R, Rubin D. 2000. Causal effects in clinical and epidemiological studies via potential outcomes: concepts and analytical approaches. Annu. Rev. Public Health 21:121–45
    [Google Scholar]
45. Lown E, Goldsby R, Mertens A, Greenfield T, Bond J et al. 2008. Alcohol consumption patterns and risk factors among childhood cancer survivors compared to siblings and general population peers. Addiction 103:71139–48
    [Google Scholar]
46. Lundström S, Forsman M, Larsson H, Kerekes N, Serlachius E et al. 2014. Childhood neurodevelopmental disorders and violent criminality: a sibling control study. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 44:112707–16
    [Google Scholar]
47. Maršál K, Persson P, Larsen T, Lilja H, Selbing A, Sultan B 1996. Intrauterine growth curves based on ultrasonically estimated foetal weights. Acta Paediatr. 85:7843–48
    [Google Scholar]
48. Meyer K, Williams P, Hernandez-Diaz S, Cnattingius S. 2004. Smoking and the risk of oral clefts: exploring the impact of study designs. Epidemiology 15:6671–78
    [Google Scholar]
49. Mundlak Y. 1978. Pooling of time-series and cross-section data. Econometrica 46:169–85
    [Google Scholar]
50. Murray C. 2002. IQ and income inequality in a sample of sibling pairs from advantaged family backgrounds. Am. Econ. Rev. 92:2339–43
    [Google Scholar]
51. Neuhaus J, McCulloch C. 2006. Separating between- and within-cluster covariate effects by using conditional and partitioning methods. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 68:5859–72
    [Google Scholar]
52. Nilsen T, Knudsen G, Gervin K, Brandt I, Røysamb E et al. 2013. The Norwegian twin registry from a public health perspective: a research update. Twin Res. Hum. Genet. 16:1285–95
    [Google Scholar]
53. Nosarti C, Reichenberg A, Murray R, Cnattingius S, Lambe M et al. 2012. Preterm birth and psychiatric disorders in young adult life. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 69:6610–17
    [Google Scholar]
54. Pearl J. 1995. Causal diagrams for empirical research. Biometrika 82:4669–88
    [Google Scholar]
55. Pearl J. 2009. Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press. , 2nd ed..
    [Google Scholar]
56. Petersen A, Lange T. 2020. What is the causal interpretation of sibling comparison designs?. Epidemiology 31:175–81
    [Google Scholar]
57. Pettersson E, Sjölander A, Almqvist C, Anckarsäter H, D'Onofrio B et al. 2015. Birth weight as an independent predictor of ADHD symptoms: a within-twin pair analysis. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 56:4453–59
    [Google Scholar]
58. Piirtola M, Jelenkovic A, Latvala A, Sund R, Honda C et al. 2018. Association of current and former smoking with body mass index: a study of smoking discordant twin pairs from 21 twin cohorts. PLOS ONE 13:7e0200140
    [Google Scholar]
59. Rosenbaum P. 2015. How to see more in observational studies: some new quasi-experimental devices. Annu. Rev. Stat. Appl. 2:21–48
    [Google Scholar]
60. Rosenbaum P. 2020. Modern algorithms for matching in observational studies. Annu. Rev. Stat. Appl. 7:143–76
    [Google Scholar]
61. Rubin D. 1974. Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. J. Educ. Psychol. 66:5688–701
    [Google Scholar]
62. Seaman S, Pavlou M, Copas A. 2014. Review of methods for handling confounding by cluster and informative cluster size in clustered data. Stat. Med. 33:305371–87
    [Google Scholar]
63. Sjölander A. 2013. Reducing mean squared error in the analysis of binary paired data. Epidemiol. Methods 2:133–47
    [Google Scholar]
64. Sjölander A. 2021. Estimation of marginal causal effects in the presence of confounding by cluster. Biostatistics 22:3598–612
    [Google Scholar]
65. Sjölander A, Frisell T, Kuja-Halkola R, Öberg S, Zetterqvist J. 2016. Carryover effects in sibling comparison designs. Epidemiology 27:6852–58
    [Google Scholar]
66. Sjölander A, Frisell T, Öberg S. 2012a. Causal interpretation of between-within models for twin research. Epidemiol. Methods 1:1217–37
    [Google Scholar]
67. Sjölander A, Johansson A, Lundholm C, Altman D, Almqvist C, Pawitan Y 2012b. Analysis of 1:1 matched cohort studies and twin studies, with binary exposures and binary outcomes. Stat. Sci. 27:3395–411
    [Google Scholar]
68. Sjölander A, Lichtenstein P, Larsson H, Pawitan Y. 2013. Between–within models for survival analysis. Stat. Med. 32:183067–76
    [Google Scholar]
69. Sjölander A, Zetterqvist J. 2017. Confounders, mediators, or colliders. Epidemiology 28:4540–47
    [Google Scholar]
70. Skinner C, D'Arragio J. 2011. Inverse probability weighting for clustered nonresponse. Biometrika 98:4953–66
    [Google Scholar]
71. Skytthe A, Ohm Kyvik K, Vilstrup Holm N, Christensen K 2011. The Danish twin registry. Scand. J. Public Health 39:775–78
    [Google Scholar]
72. Stefanski L, Boos D. 2002. The calculus of M-estimation. Am. Stat. 56:129–38
    [Google Scholar]
73. Sullivan W. 1899. A note on the influence of maternal inebriety on the offspring. J. Mental Sci. 45:190489–503
    [Google Scholar]
74. Wikipedia 2020. Small for gestational age. Wikipedia . https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Small_for_gestational_age&oldid=995728915
75. Zagai U, Lichtenstein P, Pedersen N, Magnusson P. 2019. The Swedish twin registry: content and management as a research infrastructure. Twin Res. Hum. Genet. 22:6672–80
    [Google Scholar]
76. Zetterqvist J, Vansteelandt S, Pawitan Y, Sjölander A. 2016. Doubly robust methods for handling confounding by cluster. Biostatistics 17:2264–76
    [Google Scholar]
77. Zetterqvist J, Vermeulen K, Vansteelandt S, Sjölander A. 2019. Doubly robust conditional logistic regression. Stat. Med. 38:234749–60
    [Google Scholar]