Flexible Models for Complex Data with Applications

Literature Cited

1. Aas K, Czado C, Frigessi A, Bakken H 2009. Pair-copula constructions of multiple dependence. Insur. Math. Econ. 44:182–98
   [Google Scholar]
2. Abe T, Ley C. 2017. A tractable, parsimonious and highly flexible model for cylindrical data, with applications. Econom. Stat. 4:91–104
   [Google Scholar]
3. Abe T, Pewsey A. 2011a. Sine-skewed circular distributions. Stat. Pap. 52:683–707
   [Google Scholar]
4. Abe T, Pewsey A. 2011b. Symmetric circular models through duplication and cosine perturbation. Comp. Stat. Data Anal. 55:3271–82
   [Google Scholar]
5. Adcock C, Azzalini A. 2020. A selective overview of skew-elliptical and related distributions and of their applications. Symmetry 12:118
   [Google Scholar]
6. Ameijeiras-Alonso J, Ley C. 2019. Sine-skewed toroidal distributions and their application in protein bioinformatics. arXiv:1910.13293 [stat.ME]
7. Andrews D, Gnanadesikan R, Warner J 1971. Transformations of multivariate data. Biometrics 27:825–40
   [Google Scholar]
8. Arellano-Valle RB, Genton MG. 2010. Multivariate extended skew-t distributions and related families. Metron 68:201–34
   [Google Scholar]
9. Arnold R, Jupp PE. 2018. Statistics of orientations of symmetrical objects. Applied Directional Statistics: Modern Methods and Case Studies C Ley, T Verdebout 25–44 Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC
   [Google Scholar]
10. Atkinson A. 2020. The Box-Cox transformation: review and extensions. Stat. Sci. In press
    [Google Scholar]
11. Azzalini A. 2017. sn: the skew-normal and related distributions such as the skew-t. R Package version 1.6-2. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=sn
    [Google Scholar]
12. Azzalini A, Capitanio A. 2003. Distributions generated by perturbation of symmetry with emphasis on a multivariate skew t-distribution. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 65:367–89
    [Google Scholar]
13. Azzalini A, Dalla Valle A 1996. The multivariate skew-normal distribution. Biometrika 83:715–26
    [Google Scholar]
14. Azzalini A, Genton MG. 2008. Robust likelihood methods based on the skew-t and related distributions. Int. Stat. Rev. 76:106–29
    [Google Scholar]
15. Babić S, Ley C, Veredas D 2019. Comparison and classification of flexible distributions for multivariate skew and heavy-tailed data. Symmetry 11:101216
    [Google Scholar]
16. Balakrishnan N, Lai CD. 2009. Continuous Bivariate Distributions New York: Springer
17. Batschelet E. 1981. Circular Statistics in Biology London: Academic
18. Bedford T, Cooke RM. 2002. Vines: a new graphical model for dependent random variables. Ann. Stat. 30:1031–68
    [Google Scholar]
19. Bermúdez L, Karlis D, Santolino M 2017. A finite mixture of multiple discrete distributions for modelling heaped count data. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 112:14–23
    [Google Scholar]
20. Böhning D. 1999. Computer-Assisted Analysis of Mixtures and Applications: Meta-Analysis, Disease Mapping, and Others Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC
21. Box GE, Cox DR. 1964. An analysis of transformations. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 26:211–43
    [Google Scholar]
22. Breiman L. 2001. Statistical modeling: the two cultures. Stat. Sci. 6:199–231
    [Google Scholar]
23. Charemza W, Vela CD, Makarova S 2013. Too many skew-normal distributions? The practitioners perspective Discuss. Pap. Econ. 13/07 Univ. Leicester, UK
24. Clayton DG. 1978. A model for association in bivariate life tables and its application in epidemiological studies of familial tendency in chronic disease incidence. Biometrika 65:141–51
    [Google Scholar]
25. Craens D, Ley C. 2018. Invited opinion paper: Analysis of biological and biomedical data with circular statistics. Biostat. Biom. Open Access J. 5:555671
    [Google Scholar]
26. Dominicy Y, Sinner C. 2017. Distributions and composite models for size-type data. Advances in Statistical Methodologies and Their Applications to Real Problems T Hokimoto 159–84 Rijeka, Croatia: InTech
    [Google Scholar]
27. Dryden IL. 2005. Statistical analysis on high-dimensional spheres and shape spaces. Ann. Stat. 33:1643–65
    [Google Scholar]
28. Embrechts P, Hofert M. 2013. Statistical inference for copulas in high dimensions: a simulation study. ASTIN Bull. J. IAA 43:81–95
    [Google Scholar]
29. Everitt B, Hand D. 1981. Finite Mixture Distributions New York: Chapman and Hall
30. Fang HB, Fang KT, Kotz S 2002. The meta-elliptical distributions with given marginals. J. Multivar. Anal. 82:1–16
    [Google Scholar]
31. Field C, Genton MG. 2006. The multivariate g-and-h distribution. Technometrics 48:104–11
    [Google Scholar]
32. Forbes F, Wraith D. 2014. A new family of multivariate heavy-tailed distributions with variable marginal amounts of tailweight: application to robust clustering. Stat. Comput. 24:971–84
    [Google Scholar]
33. Frank MJ 1979. On the simultaneous associativity of F(x, y) and x + y − F(x, y). Aequ. Math. 19:194–226
    [Google Scholar]
34. Fréchet M. 1951. Sur les tableaux de corrélation dont les marges sont données. Ann. Univ. Lyon 3e Sér. Sci. Sect. A 14:53–77
    [Google Scholar]
35. Gatto R, Jammalamadaka SR. 2007. The generalized von Mises distribution. Stat. Methodol. 4:341–53
    [Google Scholar]
36. Gauss CF. 1809. Theoria motus corporum coelestium in sectionibus conicis solem ambientium. Hamburg, Ger: Perthes and Besser
37. Gelfand AE, Banerjee S. 2017. Bayesian modeling and analysis of geostatistical data. Annu. Rev. Stat. Appl. 4:245–66
    [Google Scholar]
38. Genest C, Rivest LP. 1993. Statistical inference procedures for bivariate Archimedean copulas. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 88:1034–43
    [Google Scholar]
39. Genton MG. 2004. Skew-Elliptical Distributions and Their Applications: A Journey Beyond Normality Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC
40. Genton MG, Thompson KR. 2004. Skew-elliptical time series with application to flooding risk. Time Series Analysis and Applications to Geophysical Systems D Brillinger, EA Robinson, FP Schoenberg 169–85 New York: Springer
    [Google Scholar]
41. Ghalanos A, Theussl S. 2015. Rsolnp: general non-linear optimization using augmented Lagrange multiplier method. R Package version 1.16. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=Rsolnp
    [Google Scholar]
42. Gugliani G, Sarkar A, Ley C, Mandal S 2018. New methods to assess wind resources in terms of wind speed, load, power and direction. Renew. Energy 129:168–82
    [Google Scholar]
43. Gumbel EJ. 1960. Bivariate exponential distributions. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 55:698–707
    [Google Scholar]
44. Hallin M, Ley C. 2012. Skew-symmetric distributions and Fisher information—a tale of two densities. Bernoulli 18:747–63
    [Google Scholar]
45. Hamelryck T, Mardia KV, Ferkinghoff-Borg J 2012. Bayesian Methods in Structural Bioinformatics Berlin: Springer
46. Hofert M, Kojadinovic I, Maechler M, Yan J 2017. copula: multivariate dependence with copulas. R Package version 1.0-0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=copula
    [Google Scholar]
47. Hunt E. 2011. Human Intelligence Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
48. Jammalamadaka SR, SenGupta A. 2001. Topics in Circular Statistics Singapore: World Sci.
49. Jangamshetti SH, Rau GV. 2001. Normalized power curves as a tool for identification of optimum wind turbine generator parameters. IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. 16:283–88
    [Google Scholar]
50. Jia L, Li K, Yu J, Guo X, Zhao T 2020. Prediction and analysis of Coronavirus Disease 2019. arXiv:2003.05447 [q-bio.PE]
51. Joe H 1996. Families of m-variate distributions with given margins and m(m − 1)/2 bivariate dependence parameters. Lect. Notes Monogr. Ser. 28:120–41
    [Google Scholar]
52. Joe H. 1997. Multivariate Models and Multivariate Dependence Concepts Berlin: Springer
53. Johnson RA, Wehrly TE. 1978. Some angular-linear distributions and related regression models. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 73:602–6
    [Google Scholar]
54. Jones MC. 2015. On families of distributions with shape parameters (with discussion). Int. Stat. Rev. 83:175–92
    [Google Scholar]
55. Jones MC, Faddy MJ. 2003. A skew extension of the t-distribution, with applications. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 65:159–74
    [Google Scholar]
56. Jones MC, Pewsey A. 2005. A family of symmetric distributions on the circle. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 100:1422–28
    [Google Scholar]
57. Jones MC, Pewsey A. 2009. Sinh-arcsinh distributions. Biometrika 96:761–80
    [Google Scholar]
58. Jones MC, Pewsey A, Kato S 2015. On a class of circulas: copulas for circular distributions. Ann. Inst. Stat. Math. 67:843–62
    [Google Scholar]
59. Kato S, Jones MC. 2010. A family of distributions on the circle with links to, and applications arising from, Möbius transformation. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 105:249–62
    [Google Scholar]
60. Kato S, Jones MC. 2015. A tractable and interpretable four-parameter family of unimodal distributions on the circle. Biometrika 102:181–90
    [Google Scholar]
61. Kato S, Pewsey A. 2015. A Möbius transformation-induced distribution on the torus. Biometrika 102:359–70
    [Google Scholar]
62. Kato S, Shimizu K. 2008. Dependent models for observations which include angular ones. J. Stat. Plan. Infer. 138:3538–49
    [Google Scholar]
63. Kelker D. 1970. Distribution theory of spherical distributions and a location-scale parameter generalization. Sankhyā Indian J. Stat. A 32:419–30
    [Google Scholar]
64. Kleiber C, Kotz S. 2003. Statistical Size Distributions in Economics and Actuarial Sciences New York: Wiley
65. Kotz S, Balakrishnan N, Johnson NL 2004. Continuous Multivariate Distributions: Models and Applications, Vol. 1 New York: Wiley
66. Kowalczyk H. 2013. Inflation fan charts and different dimensions of uncertainty. What if macroeconomic uncertainty is high? Work. Pap. 157 Natl. Bank Pol Warsaw, Pol:.
67. Kurowicka D, Joe H. 2010. Dependence Modeling: Vine Copula Handbook Singapore: World Sci.
68. Lagona F. 2019. Correlated cylindrical data. Applied Directional Statistics: Modern Methods and Case Studies C Ley, T Verdebout 45–60 Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC
    [Google Scholar]
69. Lagona F, Picone M, Maruotti A 2015. A Hidden Markov model for the analysis of cylindrical time series. Environmetrics 26:535–44
    [Google Scholar]
70. Lambert P, Vandenhende F. 2002. A copula-based model for multivariate non-normal longitudinal data: analysis of a dose titration safety study on a new antidepressant. Stat. Med. 21:3197–217
    [Google Scholar]
71. Lee C, Famoye F, Alzaatreh A 2013. Methods for generating families of univariate continuous distributions in the recent decades. WIREs Comput. Stat. 5:219–38
    [Google Scholar]
72. Ley C. 2015. Flexible modelling in statistics: past, present and future. J. Soc. Fr. Stat. 156:76–96
    [Google Scholar]
73. Ley C, Paindaveine D. 2010a. Multivariate skewing mechanisms: a unified perspective based on the transformation approach. Stat. Probab. Lett. 80:1685–94
    [Google Scholar]
74. Ley C, Paindaveine D. 2010b. On the singularity of multivariate skew-symmetric models. J. Multivar. Anal. 101:1434–44
    [Google Scholar]
75. Ley C, Van de Wiele T, Van Eetvelde H 2019. Ranking soccer teams on the basis of their current strength: a comparison of maximum likelihood approaches. Stat. Model. 19:55–77
    [Google Scholar]
76. Ley C, Verdebout T. 2017. Modern Directional Statistics Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC
77. Lombardi MJ, Veredas D. 2009. Indirect estimation of elliptical stable distributions. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 53:2309–24
    [Google Scholar]
78. Mardia KV. 1975. Statistics of directional data (with discussion). J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 37:349–93
    [Google Scholar]
79. Mardia KV, Hughes G, Taylor CC, Singh H 2008. A multivariate von Mises distribution with applications to bioinformatics. Can. J. Stat. 36:99–109
    [Google Scholar]
80. Mardia KV, Jupp PE. 2000. Directional Statistics New York: Wiley
81. Mardia KV, Ley C. 2018. Directional distributions. Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online N Balakrishnan, T Colton, B Everitt, W Piegorsch, F Ruggeri, J Teugels 1–13 New York: Wiley
    [Google Scholar]
82. Mardia KV, Patrangenaru V. 2005. Directions and projective shapes. Ann. Stat. 33:1666–99
    [Google Scholar]
83. Mardia KV, Sutton TW. 1975. On the modes of a mixture of two von Mises distributions. Biometrika 62:699–701
    [Google Scholar]
84. Mardia KV, Sutton TW. 1978. A model for cylindrical variables with applications. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 40:229–33
    [Google Scholar]
85. Mardia KV, Taylor CC, Subramaniam GK 2007. Protein bioinformatics and mixtures of bivariate von Mises distributions for angular data. Biometrics 63:505–12
    [Google Scholar]
86. McLachlan GJ, Basford KE. 1988. Mixture Models: Inference and Applications to Clustering New York: M. Dekker
87. McLachlan GJ, Lee SX, Rathnayake SI 2019. Finite mixture models. Annu. Rev. Stat. Appl. 6:355–78
    [Google Scholar]
88. McNeil AJ, Frey R, Embrechts P 2005. Quantitative Risk Management: Concepts, Techniques and Tools, Vol. 3 Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
89. Mengersen KL, Robert C, Titterington M 2011. Mixtures: Estimation and Applications New York: Wiley
90. Mooney JA, Helms PJ, Jolliffe IT 2003. Fitting mixtures of von Mises distributions: a case study involving sudden infant death syndrome. Comp. Stat. Data Anal. 41:505–13
    [Google Scholar]
91. Müller D, Czado C. 2019. Dependence modelling in ultra high dimensions with vine copulas and the Graphical Lasso. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 137:211–32
    [Google Scholar]
92. Nagler T, Bumann C, Czado C 2019. Model selection in sparse high-dimensional vine copula models with an application to portfolio risk. J. Multivar. Anal. 172:180–92
    [Google Scholar]
93. Nagler T, Schepsmeier U, Stoeber J, Brechmann EC, Graeler B, Erhardt T 2020. VineCopula: statistical inference of vine copulas. R Package version 2.4.1. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=VineCopula
    [Google Scholar]
94. Nelsen RB. 2003. Properties and applications of copulas: A brief survey. Proceedings of the First Brazilian Conference on Statistical Modelling in Insurance and Finance J Dhaene, N Kolev, P Morettin 10–28 Sao Paulo: Inst. Math. Stat. Univ. Sao Paulo
    [Google Scholar]
95. Nelsen RB. 2006. An Introduction to Copulas New York: Springer. , 2nd. ed.
96. Paindaveine D. 2012. Elliptical symmetry. Encyclopedia of Environmetrics AH El-Shaarawi, W Piegorsch 802–7 New York: Wiley. , 2nd. ed.
    [Google Scholar]
97. Pewsey A. 2008. The wrapped stable family of distributions as a flexible model for circular data. Comp. Stat. Data Anal. 52:1516–23
    [Google Scholar]
98. Pewsey A, Kato S. 2016. Parametric bootstrap goodness-of-fit testing for Wehrly–Johnson bivariate circular distributions. Stat. Comput. 26:1307–17
    [Google Scholar]
99. Pewsey A, Neuhäuser M, Ruxton GD 2013. Circular Statistics in R Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
100. Ramachandran GN. 1963. Stereochemistry of polypeptide chain configurations. J. Mol. Biol. 7:95–99
     [Google Scholar]
101. Ranalli M, Lagona F, Picone M, Zambianchi E 2018. Segmentation of sea current fields by cylindrical hidden Markov models: a composite likelihood approach. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. C 67:575–98
     [Google Scholar]
102. Scrucca L, Fop M, Murphy TB, Raftery AE 2016. mclust 5: Clustering, classification and density estimation using Gaussian finite mixture models. R J. 8:205–33
     [Google Scholar]
103. Sellers KF, Swift AW, Weems KS 2017. A flexible distribution class for count data. J. Stat. Distrib. Appl. 4:22
     [Google Scholar]
104. Siffer A. 2018. Rfolding: the folding test of unimodality. R Package version 1.0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=Rfolding
     [Google Scholar]
105. Singh H, Hnizdo V, Demchuk E 2002. Probabilistic model for two dependent circular variables. Biometrika 89:719–23
     [Google Scholar]
106. Sklar M 1959. Fonctions de répartition à n dimensions et leurs marges. Publ. Inst. Stat. Univ. Paris 8:229–31
     [Google Scholar]
107. Stigler SM. 1986. The History of Statistics: The Measurement of Uncertainty Before 1900 Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
108. Tibshirani R, Taylor J, Lockhart R, Tibshirani R, Fithian W et al. 2015. Recent advances in post-selection statistical inference Breiman Lecture presented at NIPS 2015, the Twenty-Ninth Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Dec. 7–12 Montreal, Can:.
109. Tukey JW. 1977. Modern techniques in data analysis Presented at the NSF-Sponsored Regional Research Conference, Southern Massachusetts University North Dartmouth, MA:
110. Wang J, Boyer J, Genton MG 2004. A skew-symmetric representation of multivariate distributions. Stat. Sin. 14:1259–70
     [Google Scholar]
111. Wehrly TE, Johnson RA. 1980. Bivariate models for dependence of angular observations and a related Markov process. Biometrika 66:255–56
     [Google Scholar]
112. Wraith D, Forbes F. 2015. Location and scale mixtures of Gaussians with flexible tail behaviour: properties, inference and application to multivariate clustering. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 90:61–73
     [Google Scholar]
113. Wuertz D, Setz T, Chalabi Y 2020. fmultivar: Rmetrics—analysing and modeling multivariate financial return distributions. R Package version 3042.80.1. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=fMultivar
     [Google Scholar]
114. Ye Y. 1987. Interior algorithms for linear, quadratic, and linearly constrained non-linear programming PhD Thesis, Dep. ESS, Stanford University
115. Yeo IK, Johnson RA. 2000. A new family of power transformations to improve normality or symmetry. Biometrika 87:954–59
     [Google Scholar]